Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Showing posts with label Development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Development. Show all posts

Saturday, July 15, 2017

[Ornithology • 2017] Distinct Developmental Pathways Underlie Independent Losses of Flight in Ratites


Greater Rhea (Rhea americana) in the Brazilian Pantanal.
Faux and Field provide developmental support for the surprising hypothesis that rheas, as well as other ratites including ostriches and emus, have evolved flightlessness and large size independently.
photo: Daniel J. Field

Abstract

Recent phylogenetic studies question the monophyly of ratites (large, flightless birds incorporating ostriches, rheas, kiwis, emus and cassowaries), suggesting their paraphyly with respect to flying tinamous (Tinamidae). Flightlessness and large body size have thus likely evolved repeatedly among ratites, and separately in ostriches (Struthio) and emus (Dromaius). Here, we test this hypothesis with data from wing developmental trajectories in ostriches, emus, tinamous and chickens. We find the rate of ostrich embryonic wing growth falls within the range of variation exhibited by flying taxa (tinamous and chickens), but that of emus is extremely slow. These results indicate flightlessness was acquired by different developmental mechanisms in the ancestors of ostriches (peramorphosis) and the emu–cassowary clade (paedomorphosis), and corroborate the hypothesis that flight loss has evolved repeatedly among ratites.

KEYWORDS: ratites, flightlessness, evo devo, embryology, Palaeognathae, heterochrony


Cynthia Faux and Daniel J. Field. 2017. Distinct Developmental Pathways Underlie Independent Losses of Flight in Ratites. Biology Letters.  DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0234

  The face you make after seeing #BiologyLetters new cover... (photo from @daniel_j_field) via @RSocPublishing


Wednesday, November 16, 2016

[Herpetology • 2016] Larval External Morphology and Development in Feihyla kajau (Dring,1983) (Anura: Rhacophoridae)




Abstract

 The external morphology and development of the tadpoles of Feihyla kajau (Dring, 1983) from Kubah National Park, Sarawak, East Malaysia (Borneo), are described. The species produce small clutches of 7–10 (mean 8.60 ± SE 0.51) eggs within a mass of jelly-like substance that is stuck to leaves near standing bodies of water, such as stagnant pools and swamps. The tadpoles reach 26.7 mm in total length, their body shapes subglobose to ovoid in dorsal view; eyes positioned dorsolaterally; spiracle sinistral; oral disk anteroventral; marginal papillation of oral disk with broad gap on upper lip and no gap on lower lip; oral disk marginal papillae arranged in single row; labial ridges with uniserial keratodont rows; and Labial Tooth Row Formula 4(2–4)/3. Morphological changes during development are documented according to the staging table of Gosner (1960). Development was recorded from Stage 26 until Stage 42. Time taken to reach Stage 42 was 110 days. It is shown that developmental time and stages have a pronounced nonlinear relationship; stages are only ordinal. Ex situ conditions required to raise the tadpoles of the species are described, which include water temperature, food and condition of growing provided.

Key words. Tadpole, growth, description, staging, metamorphosis, Feihyla kajau, Malaysia, Borneo


Indraneil Das, Hairi Hedeir, Yong Min Pui, Stefan T. Hertwigand Alexander Haas. 2016. Larval External Morphology and Development in Feihyla kajau (Dring,1983) (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae). RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY. 64: 319–328.

Thursday, March 13, 2014

[Botany • 2013] Developmental Origins of the World’s largest flowers, Rafflesiaceae


Pictured is a flower of the plant Rafflesia, which produces the world's largest flowers at up to one meter in diameter. These parasitic plants, found in Southeast Asia, attract carrion fly pollinators with an odor similar to rotting flesh. Lachezar A. Nikolov et al. examined the morphological differences between Rafflesia and its close relative Sapria, both members of the Rafflesiaceae family. The two genera both enclose their reproductive organs within a diaphragm, yet the structures of the diaphragms are markedly different. The findings suggest that the two genera developed their respective floral structures independently, via two different developmental pathways.
photo: Jeremy Holden | doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310356110

Abstract
Rafflesiaceae, which produce the world’s largest flowers, have captivated the attention of biologists for nearly two centuries. Despite their fame, however, the developmental nature of the floral organs in these giants has remained a mystery. Most members of the family have a large floral chamber defined by a diaphragm. The diaphragm encloses the reproductive organs where pollination by carrion flies occurs. In lieu of a functional genetic system to investigate floral development in these highly specialized holoparasites, we used comparative studies of structure, development, and gene-expression patterns to investigate the homology of their floral organs. Our results surprisingly demonstrate that the otherwise similar floral chambers in two Rafflesiaceae subclades, Rafflesia and Sapria, are constructed very differently. In Rafflesia, the diaphragm is derived from the petal whorl. In contrast, in Sapria it is derived from elaboration of a unique ring structure located between the perianth and the stamen whorl, which, although developed to varying degrees among the genera, appears to be a synapomorphy of the Rafflesiaceae. Thus, the characteristic features that define the floral chamber in these closely related genera are not homologous. These differences refute the prevailing hypothesis that similarities between Sapria and Rafflesia are ancestral in the family. Instead, our data indicate that Rafflesia-like and Sapria-like floral chambers represent two distinct derivations of this morphology. The developmental repatterning we identified in Rafflesia, in particular, may have provided architectural reinforcement, which permitted the explosive growth in floral diameter that has arisen secondarily within this subclade.

Keywords: ABC model, comparative gene expression, evo-devo, gigantism, parasitic plants

Fig. 1. Gross morphology, longitudinal sections,
and accepted phylogenetic relationships of Rafflesiaceae.
Rafflesia (A) and Sapria (C) exhibit floral chambers, defined by a diaphragm, where the central reproductive column resides. The central column of Rhizanthes (B) is exposed because no floral chamber is formed.
(Scale bars, ∼2 cm.) Photos: (A) D. Boufford, (B) C.C.D., (C) L.A.N.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310356110

Significance

Rafflesiaceae produce the world’s largest flowers, but the developmental nature of their floral organs has remained a mystery. Most members of the family have a large floral chamber, which encloses their reproductive organs. We used comparative studies of development and gene-expression patterns to investigate the homology of their floral organs. Our results demonstrate that the similar floral chambers in two Rafflesiaceae subclades are constructed very differently. Thus, the characteristic features that define the floral chamber in these closely related clades are not homologous. Instead, these data indicate that similar floral chambers represent two distinct derivations of this morphology, which may have contributed to the explosive growth in floral diameter that arose secondarily within one subclade, Rafflesia.


Lachezar A. Nikolov, Peter K. Endress, M. Sugumaran, Sawitree Sasirat, Suyanee Vessabutr, Elena M. Kramer, and Charles C. Davis. 2013. Developmental Origins of the World’s largest flowers, Rafflesiaceae. PNAS. 110(46); 18578–18583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310356110

Saturday, November 9, 2013

[Crustacea • 2013] A Crab with Three Eyes, Two Rostra, and a Dorsal Antenna-like Structure | malformed freshwater crab Amarinus lacustris from New Zealand



Highlights
• We describe a crab with three eyes, two rostra, and a dorsal antenna-like structure.
• An inspection of internal features revealed a brain with enlarged protocerebrum.
• The putative causes for this kind of malformation are discussed.
• A scenario combining a conjoined twin with a regeneration event seems most likely.

Abstract
We describe a malformed specimen of the freshwater crab Amarinus lacustris from New Zealand. With three eyes in a horizontal row, two rostra, and a dorsal antenna-like structure, the pattern of malformation of this animal is unique and has not been described before. A careful inspection and description of external and internal structures, in particular the central nervous system, were carried out. These revealed, in addition to the external abnormalities, a retarded brain with a hypertrophied and backwards bent protocerebrum connected with all three eyes and putatively with the dorsal antenna-like structure. Based on these data, a variety of hypotheses about the causes for this kind of malformation are discussed. A scenario combining a conjoined twin (Duplicitas anterior) based on the duplication of the embryonic anterior head lobes and a regeneration event leading to the replacement of an eye by an antenna shows the best fit to the observed patterns.

Keywords: Crustacea Decapoda; Siamese twins; regeneration; brain; development


Gerhard Scholtz, Peter K.L. Ng and Stephen Moore. 2013. A Crab with Three Eyes, Two Rostra, and a Dorsal Antenna-like Structure. Arthropod Structure & Development. 

Blinky the crab has three eyes

Saturday, May 4, 2013

[Testudology • 2013] The draft genomes of soft-shell turtle and green sea turtle yield insights into the development and evolution of the turtle-specific body plan | Turtle genome analysis sheds light on turtle ancestry and shell evolution


Turtle and chicken body plan during development 


The unique anatomical features of turtles have raised unanswered questions about the origin of their unique body plan. We generated and analyzed draft genomes of the soft-shell turtle (Pelodiscus sinensis) and the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas); our results indicated the close relationship of the turtles to the bird-crocodilian lineage, from which they split ~267.9–248.3 million years ago (Upper Permian to Triassic). We also found extensive expansion of olfactory receptor genes in these turtles. Embryonic gene expression analysis identified an hourglass-like divergence of turtle and chicken embryogenesis, with maximal conservation around the vertebrate phylotypic period, rather than at later stages that show the amniote-common pattern. Wnt5a expression was found in the growth zone of the dorsal shell, supporting the possible co-option of limb-associated Wnt signaling in the acquisition of this turtle-specific novelty. Our results suggest that turtle evolution was accompanied by an unexpectedly conservative vertebrate phylotypic period, followed by turtle-specific repatterning of development to yield the novel structure of the shell.


Zhuo Wang, Juan Pascual-Anaya, Amonida Zadissa, Wenqi Li, Yoshihito Niimura, Zhiyong Huang, Chunyi Li, Simon White, Zhiqiang Xiong, Dongming Fang, Bo Wang, Yao Ming, Yan Chen, Yuan Zheng, Shigehiro Kuraku, Miguel Pignatelli, Javier Herrero, Kathryn Beal, Masafumi Nozawa, Qiye Li, Juan Wang, Hongyan Zhang, Lili Yu, Shuji Shigenobu, Junyi Wang, Jiannan Liu, Paul Flicek, Steve Searle, Jun Wang, Shigeru Kuratani, Ye Yin, Bronwen Aken, Guojie Zhang & Naoki Irie. 2013. The draft genomes of soft-shell turtle and green sea turtle yield insights into the development and evolution of the turtle-specific body plan. Nature Genetics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.2615

Turtle genome analysis sheds light on turtle ancestry and shell evolution