Sample PID
Sample PID
Sample PID
12/5/14
2014
Practical Implementation of a Construction
Quality Management System (CQMS)
Project Initiation Document
5854165
5984004
5961315
6058700
5971945
5854165
5818868
4067979
page 0 of 32
Coventry University
12/4/2014
12/5/14
Project Name:
Date:
Author:
Owner:
801 Consultations
Client:
Document Number:
Final
Revision History
Revision
Date
Previous
Revision
Date
Changes
Marked
Approvals
This document requires the following approvals. A signed copy should be placed in
the project files.
Name
Signature
Title
Date
of Version
Issue
Chioma
Project Manager
4/10/2014
Final
Nnorukah
Obiukwu
Ikenna
Clinton
Configuration
Manager
4/10/2014
Final
page 1 of 32
12/5/14
Distribution
This document has been distributed to:
Name
Title
Harrop W.
Executive
Date
of Version
Issue
5/10/2014
Final
Acquah-Andoh, E.
Senior Sponsor
5/10/2014
Final
page 2 of 32
Contents
12/5/14
page 3 of 32
12/5/14
Project Definition
Background
The purpose of this project is to develop a white paper for the effective implementation of
a Construction Quality Management System (CQMS) in gas pipeline construction. This
project shall relay a report in simple communicative document, to guidance pipeline
companies and INGAA Foundation members on practical steps to implementing a
Construction Quality Management System (CQMS).
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA), formed in 1990, a foundation that
will enhance the use of natural gas, in a way that it will have a positive impact on the
environment and also give value to the people who use it. The foundation strives to
facilitate a painstaking construction and dependable operation of the North American
natural gas pipeline system, and encourage natural gas infrastructure development
around the world (INGAA 2013).
12/5/14
Project Objectives
The main objectives of this project are to do research and gather information on quality
management system practical procedures, and practices for pipeline construction.
Develop a set of guidelines to help pipeline companies and other stakeholder in the
application of concept quality management system .Publish a CQMS white paper that
helps stakeholders and end users minimize failures ,help improve conformity to company
and industry specifications and, help maintain company compliance to regulations(INGAA
2013).
The completion time for the project is estimated to be 9 months. Estimated start date is
February 10, 2015 and the estimated end date is November 10, 2015. The timescale is
designed to include an extra 20 days. This is in case of any unforeseen delays that might
occur during the project. The Gantt chart in Figure reflects this provision.
The estimated cost for the project is $25,000.This sum is generated from the
combination of transport, communication, printing, photocopying and publishing cost.
These are all cost that will be inquired in the fulfillment of the project. An extra sum of
$5,000 will be put aside as contingency fund and will be utilized when needed. The
remaining funds will be used for consultancy fees.
The benefit of this project is that and with effective implementation of its procedures and
principles written in published CQMS whitepaper, stakeholders, end users, and people
involved in construction management can improve organizational effectiveness, improve
compliance to standards and regulations , and improve documentation(QMS 2014)
page 5 of 32
2014-12-05
Desired outcomes
The INGAA Foundation Inc. requires a satisfactory and exceptional construction
quality management system guideline that will be up to standard and will be easy to
adopt by any companys standards. This project will convey processes and stages to
follow in implementing a good CQMS.
The desired outcomes are:
To help improve management practices and quality issues with regard to
safety measures in pipeline projects in order to prevent future issues.
To provide training procedures for all construction workers and inspectors
To introduce safety guide lines for pipeline construction and create effective
audit and evaluate the effectiveness of safety.
To provide support to end users and stakeholders in establishing and applying
an effective quality management system and corresponding plans and
procedures.
To show the Industrys commitment for continual improvement.
Project scope
The scope of this project is to gather information and data on the best practices for
implementing a quality management system on pipeline construction. We are
required to publish a white paper that would contain only pertinent facts in relation to
QMS and QMS in pipeline construction. This white paper will subsequently be used
by pipeline operators, contractors and suppliers
The scope outline include,
Facilitate , organize , and guide monthly workgroup meetings
Facilitate 2 workshops, and task team presentation of information.
Review and identify key practical examples that show construction actives
and processes to be included in white pater
Review and identify quality management procedures
and processes
contained in other Oil and Gas management systems
Review and identify quality management procedure and processes contained
in Oil and Gas sectors
Review Quality Management System practices in other industries
Review and identify information that is required for the procurement of
construction related services, assemblies, equipment, and materials
Determine the sequences and relationships between QMS processes and
procedures
Determine the criteria and methods that would ensure that the operational
and control stages of these processes and procedures are effective
Write a case study of Alliance Pipeline, an INGAA member company
Provide a soft copy and three hard copies of white paper
Give presentation of white paper to stakeholders
page 6 of 32
2014-12-05
Exclusions
Based on the assumption that this project is on updating a previous version of the
white paper, these exclusion where suggested.
The focus of our study in gathering new information and experiences , and not
on previously gotten data
Constraints
Constraints are the restrictions and limitations that may bind the project during
completion.
The constraints that may be anticipated on this project are as follow:
Ensuring that procedures and practices of CQMS recorded in the white paper
conform or meet ISO 9001 standard .ISO 9001:2008 is a widely accepted
international quality management standard that set out criteria and requirement
for a quality management system(ISO 2014)
Collaborate with task teams and work group to do research and collect
information needed to be put in white paper.
The project should be completed within the estimated time and estimated cost.
The Procedures and processes adhere to government regulations and laws.
The Case study on Alliance Pipeline
Assumptions
These are assumptions that are made in regards to preparing a guide (white paper)
on the practical implementation of a Construction Quality Management System
(CQMS
The Estimated budget for the entire project is $25,000
The Estimated time for the entire project is 9 months
Workgroup meeting will occur the 10th of every month till project completion
Conference calls will occur every 2 weeks and will be used for update reports
Task teams will be divided by areas of expertise, years of experience,
certifications, skills, and positions in their different job
2014-12-05
Service providers
Pipeline operators
Pipeline workers
Interfaces
This section outlines the relationship with other interested parties and stakeholders
with reference to their importance in this project.
Other interested organizations that can be involved are;
The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) Foundation Inc.
they facilitate the efficiency of construction and safety, and also update the procedure
and processes in which the CQMS will follow.
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)-they regulate
the transport system of oil and gas (PHMSA 2014)
Canada National Energy Board- They are in the business of constructing, and
operating pipelines across international and provincial boundaries. They also
construct and operate power lines in both international and inter-provincial regions.
(NEB 2014)
Project Approach
This Project will adopt the Prince2 approach of managing in stages. The scope of this
project will be delivered in segmented stages.
The Project will have six stages
2014-12-05
The stages will only be considered complete on sign off of key deliverable by project
board and, and end stage report will be prepared by the project manager.
Business Case
A developed Construction quality management system incorporates the same
principles and standards of any other industry. All related processes involved in
pipeline construction are further defined, outlined and recorded to prevent the
reworking of the project. Furthermore, the process making changes is documented to
ensure that those changes are well planned, and implemented to maximize
efficiency.
The purpose of this project is to develop a white paper that incorporates best
practice, to implement a proper quality management system on pipeline construction
for all users or stakeholders
The benefit of using QMS does not guarantee a flawless product or services rather it
helps to create a framework to maximizing the delivery of the product. Some of the
benefit includes
Reason for 801 Consultations to undertake project
Helps in relationship building as there is potential to meet key payers and
movers in the pipeline and construction industry
It gives an opportunity to build reputation as a consultancy.
If project is successful, it can attract future projects
Estimated total profit generated is $35,000
Benefits
The Construction quality management white paper will provide assistance to
key stake holders which include pipeline operators, contractors, consultants,
and suppliers in developing and implementing an effective QMS (INGAA
2013).
Other benefits are to help develop and implement corresponding plans and
procedures for construction projects which include the procurement of related
services, assemblies, equipment and materials (INGAA 2013).
page 9 of 32
2014-12-05
Dis-benefits
Stakeholders lack of understanding of the content of whitepaper- Stakeholder
may invest money and resources only to realize that they are unable to grasp
the full meaning of all the processes and requirements (Referenceforbusiness
2014).
Inadequate funds for the establishment of the quality system- implementing
quality management cost money and some stakeholders are unable to afford
those changes (Accounting4management 2014).
Heavy emphasis on documentation
Workers may be resistant to change
No immediate Benefits- Quality management systems may take several years
for any noticeable benefits to be realized (Accounting4management 2014).
Timescale
Expected time of delivery for the project is 10 months starting February 10,
2015
Cost
Activity
Transportation
Communication
Printing and photocopying
Contingency
(Budget Table)
Cost
$10,000
$5,000
$10,000
$5,000
Investment Appraisal
This CQMS white paper will be uploaded in the INGAA website for its members and
stakeholders for free; the stated investment benefits are for those members and
stakeholder
A Survey based on the average North American registered company
states that Continuous Improvement from implementing a management
system a can result in savings up to $117,000 per annum on average
(Glinskas 2014).
page 10 of 32
2014-12-05
Risks
Risk involves in this project include;
Too Much Information
Cost could rise significantly during the course of the project
Failure to meet deadline
Inadequate training
Overdependence
Changes in priorities of senior management
Change in project product specification by Project sponsor/Client
Project Board
Executive
Senior User
Project
Manager
Risk Manager
Quality Manager
Pipeline Integrity
Manager
Communications
Manager
Financial Manager
Configurations
Manager
Role Descriptions
Project Board
The project board has the responsibility for provision of all the resources
required throughout the project (Projects 2014).
Ensure quality control and assurance have achieved through out the project
senior user
Has the responsibility of ensuring user needs are well defined and understood
Has the responsibility for communicating between the project team and the
end user community
Executive
2014-12-05
The project executive has the responsibility to authorize the proposed project
closure made by the project manager
The project executive has the responsibility of arranging project meeting
(PMHUT 2009).
Senior user
Senior User specifies the needs of those who will use the product
Monitors to ensure the solution will meet those needs
Project Manager:
To give a proper over sight of the project to the workforce
Ensure that the project is carried out in accordance to specifications
Coordinate and control all project activities and processes.
Risk Manager
Creating a strategic plan with safety rules that are needed to be followed in
order to avoid danger
Risk assessment; identifying risks and describing them
Planning, designing and implementing risk management process for the
workforce
Pipeline Integrity manager
Has the responsibility for training engineers in pipeline integrity
Move towards regulating and standardizing pipeline integrity (PENSPEN
2014).
Configurations Manager
To managing, tracking and keeping control of all the projects products
Responsible for the safe and secure storage of each project product in a way
that is most appropriate
Control changes to the products ensuring that changes are made only with
the agreement of appropriate named authority(DFP(NI) 2014)
Quality Manager
To ensure project is carried out in accordance to standards
To define quality procedures in conjunction with operating staff
Monitoring performance and review of the entire project
Communication manager
Responsible for informing people in the workforce about changes in carrying
out activities or projects
Send messages across and prepare presentations and memos to share
information
Financial Manager
page 12 of 32
2014-12-05
Responsible for budgeting and allocation of necessary funds for the project.
Preparing accurate financial reports and statements and managing accounts.
Conducting reviews on cost reduction opportunities and minimizing financial
risks.
Giving financial advice to the team in the case of making decisions.
2014-12-05
2014-12-05
2014-12-05
Product S
S1
S3
S2
S1.1
S2.1
S3.1
S3.2
The first row the project products will be referred to as opening row and
named version (S1). When the product has gone through first review by the
project board, it will be authorised making it the baseline. This baseline
version will be become S1.1.
Further changes will be not allowed to S1.1 unless it was authorized using the
Change Control procedures.
Once it has been authorized, the product will be released for Change Control
Review and would be assigned version S2.2. Once this revised product has
been signed off the version would now become S2.3.
These processes are to be repeated for each change control raised.
page 16 of 32
2014-12-05
2014-12-05
5. Overdependence: The effect on the project this may have is that the
consultant is the only qualified person and others may depend a lot on the
expertise of the consultant, adding pressure, creating room for mistakes and
slowing down the project.
6. Changes in priorities of senior management: The effect this may have on
the project is the atmosphere could become more relaxed and deadlines may
not be met at the required time.
7. Change in project product specification by Project sponsor/Client:
INGAA may change the scope of information required to but in white paper
In assessing the risks mentioned Fig 2. Shows a probability impact grid which
determines the severity or likelihood of the risk
PROBABILTY
PROBABILTY
HIGH
1,4
2,7
MEDIUM
LOW
6
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
IMPACT
Once the risks have been identified and assessed, the next stage is monitoring and
controlling those risks.
Risk Control
To monitor and control cost, tolerances must be set for all stages.
We will monitor all flow and means of acquired information. Perhaps change
members of task team if if necessary to cut costs.
In the event that these contingency plans do not work then as a control
measure the project manager should result to contingency funds the company
should have in place.
For inadequate training, ensure staffs that wish to volunteer have prior
knowledge to a certain degree that would be able to contribute to the
completion of the project beforehand. As the project moves forward feedback
from training sessions or training managers that they may have undertaken
beforehand or along the way should be provided and reviews should be done.
Monitoring and control overdependence would need the project manager to
have the work divided according to areas of strength and a weekly review be
page 18 of 32
2014-12-05
done on the progress of the project at the morning brief before the start of the
working day to avoid wasting time.
If any changes in the priorities of senior managements should change it
needs to be announced via an effective means of communication as a means
of control but before that happens those working on the project need to
enable the senior management understand the importance of the project and
keep them updated with its progress.
Project
Manager
Project Team
Information
Owner
Progress
Project
against
time, manager
budget, quality,
risk, and issues
Frequency
Every two months
Method
Presentations,
highlight
report, risk and
issues
log,
plan
Progress,
Project
Weekly
Meetings,
impacts, issues, manager
highlight
and risk
reports,
risk
and issues log
for project
Progress
Project
Weekly until stage Meeting,
manager 4,
then
when emails
required
Fig 1: Communication plan (National Archives, 2005)
2014-12-05
Alliance
Pipeline
Information
Communicate
Experiences,
and
Data
collected
Informations
on operations
and
current
quality
management
strategies
Owner
Project
manager
Frequency
Method
Every
two Meetings
weeks
emails
Project
manager
Meetings
emails
Project Plan
A project plan is defined as a document designed to serve as a guideline when
controlling and executing a project(Techopedia.com, 2014)
This project plan created with the project delivery time of 10months.
Stage 1-Pre-Project stage
The project business case will be completed. It will be the baseline for the
entire project and will guide the project board and manager.
page 20 of 32
2014-12-05
Create task team by diving them using their profile , so that each task team is
made to have individuals from all parts of the construction and pipeline
industry
Work group meetings and update reports schedule will be relayed. All
workgroup sessions will be closely monitored by the 801 consultations
manager
2014-12-05
Send draft copy to INGAA for review and make all suggested corrections.
Confirm with INGAA of the print paper quality and format, and relay
information to the printers
Acceptance record
Project Schedule
A detailed progression of the project is explain in see Gantt Chart Below
Cost Base Line
Project Stage
Cost Type
Amount
Stage 1
Printing, communication
$1000
Stage 2
Stage 3
Transportation,
$5,000
Stage 4
Printing , Communication
$4,000
Stage 5
Printing
and $5,000
photocopying,
communication, other
Stage 6
Printing ,transportation
$5,000
Milestone
Activity
Kick off work Initial Meet and Greet for all participating stakeholders
group
Divide Cross Division of attendee into cross functional task teams. Assign
Functional
research aspects of construction QMS to task teams
Task teams
page 22 of 32
2014-12-05
Workshop 1
Workshop 2
Assemble
Draft
Case Analysis Write Case study on Alliance, inclusive of visiting company to get
of
Alliance first-hand experience of their operations
Pipeline
Submit Paper Submit draft paper to INGAAs chosen key stakeholders for
for Review
review and make any suggested corrections
Presentation
Publish White Print hard copies for submission and soft copies to upload on
Paper
INGAA website
Project Controls
This project will implement the Prince2 theme of control.
Highlight reports for the project board will review progress to date , and
actual and potential problems
Any changes to the project scope defined within this PID will be recorded
and escalated to the project executive and change board
Cost
Quality
Defined
and
monitored through
all stages of the
project in Project
page 23 of 32
Team and Change
Board meetings.
2014-12-05
Tailoring of PRINCE2
Principle
Continued business justification
Definition
Throughout all stage end, and
through project execution, the
business case will checked
as to ensure the remain
viability, attainability of the
project
The business case will be
redefined
frequently
to
Use experienced staff
Manage by stages
Manage Exceptions
Focus on product
page 24 of 32
to
suit
2014-12-05
References
Accounting4management.com, (2014) Total Quality Management (TQM) System
Advantages | Disadvantages, PDCA|Definition|Articles|Example | Accounting Tips
[online] available from
<http://www.accounting4management.com/total_quality_management.htm> [3
December 2014]
Dfpni.gov.uk, (2014) Configuration Management Detail | Configuration Management |
Project Management | Welcome | D F P (N I) [online] available from
<http://www.dfpni.gov.uk/configuration_management_detail> [3 December 2014]
Energyjobline.com, (2014) Project Manager - Pipeline Integrity Management Newcastle Job In United Kingdom, Spencer Ogden Oil & Gas [online] available from
<http://www.energyjobline.com/career/69206/Project-Manager-Pipeline-IntegrityManagement-Newcastle-Newcastle-Upon-Tyne> [3 December 2014]
Episode3.aero, (2014) Quality Management Organization, Roles,
Responsibilities
Episode
3
[online]
available
<http://www.episode3.aero/help/quality-organisation> [3 December 2014]
And
from
page 25 of 32
2014-12-05
National Archives, (2005) Seamless Flow: Management Security PID. UK: National
Archives
Neb-one.gc.ca, (2014) NEB - Who We Are [online] available from <http://www.nebone.gc.ca/bts/whwr/index-eng.html> [2 December 2014]
Phmsa.dot.gov, (2014) PHMSA - About PHMSA
<http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about> [5 December 2014]
[online]
available
from
page 26 of 32
2014-12-05
Meeting Minutes
page 27 of 32
2014-12-05
page 28 of 32
2014-12-05
page 29 of 32
2014-12-05
page 30 of 32
2014-12-05
Gantt chart
page 31 of 32