research-article

Things coming together: learning experiences in a software studio

Authors:

John LeaneyAuthors Info & Claims

ITiCSE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education

Pages 129 - 134

https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2591720

Published: 21 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

We have evidence that the software studio provides learning that genuinely prepares students for professional practice. Learning that entails dealing with complex technical problems and tools. Learning that involves working effectively in groups. Learning that results in the building of students' self-confidence and the conviction that they can successfully deal with the challenges of modern software system development. Learning that allows the accomplishment of the more elusive professional competencies. In order for students to achieve this type of deep learning, they need time to immerse themselves in complex problems within a rich environment -- such as the software studio. The studio also enables each student group to develop and succeed according to their needs, and in different ways. The conclusions above arise from an ethnographic study in an undergraduate software studio prototype with two student groups and their mentors.

References

[1]

J. Armarego and L. Fowler, Orienting students to studio learning, in Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE/AAEE 4th Global Colloquium on Engineering Education. Australasian Association for Engineering Education, 2005.

[2]

J. Biggs and C. Tang, Teaching for Quality Learning at University, Fourth Edition. McGrawHill. 2011.

[3]

C. Bull, J. Whittle and L. Cruickshank, Studios in software engineering education: towards an evaluable model, in Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE13), IEEE, 2013.

Digital Library

[4]

Å Cajander, M Daniels and B von Konsky, Development of professional competencies in engineering education, in Proceedings of the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE, 2011.

Digital Library

[5]

A. Carbone and J. Sheard, A studio-based teaching and learning model in IT: what do first year students think?, in Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2002, pp. 213--217.

Digital Library

[6]

A. Carter and C. Hundhausen, A review of studio-based learning in computer science, Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Computer (JCSC 27), October, 2011.

Digital Library

[7]

K Cennamo, C Brandt, B Scott, S Douglas and M McGrath, Managing the complexity of design problems through studio-based learning, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, vol. 5, Issue 2, 2011.

[8]

M.Daniels, Developing and assessing professional competencies, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 808, 2011.

[9]

M.Daniels and Å. Cajander, Experiences from using constructive controversy in an open-ended group project, in Proceedings of the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE, 2010.

[10]

B. de la Harpe and A. Radloff, Developing graduate attributes for lifelong learning -- how far have we got?, Lifelong Learning Conference, 2008.

[11]

D. M. Fetterman, Ethnography: Step-by-Step. Third ed. Applied social research methods series, Vol. 17. Sage, 2010.

[12]

D. Garlan, D. P. Gluch and J. E. Tomayko, Agents of change: educating software engineering leaders, IEEE Computer, November, 1997.

Digital Library

[13]

O. Hazzan, The reflective practitioner perspective in software engineering education, The Journal of Systems and Software, 63, 2002.

Digital Library

[14]

C. Hundhausen, A. Agrawal, D. Fairbrother and M. Trevisan, Integrating pedagogical code reviews into a CS 1 course: an empirical study, SIGCSE'09, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA, 2009.

Digital Library

[15]

C. Hundhausen, A. Agrawal, D. Fairbrother and M. Trevisan, Does studio-based instruction work in CS 1? An empirical comparison with a traditional approach, SIGCSE '10, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, 2010.

Digital Library

[16]

T. Koppi, P. Ogunbona, J. Armarego, P. Bailes, P. Hyland, T. McGill, F. Naghdy, G. Naghdy, C. Pilgrim and M. Roberts, Addressing ICT curriculum recommendations from surveys of academics, workplace graduates and employers, OLT Final Report. Wollongong: University of Wollongong, 2013.

[17]

L. Suchman. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Digital Library

[18]

S. L. Star. The trojan door: organizations, work and the "open black box". Systems Practice, 5(4), 1992.

[19]

L. Williams, L. Layman, K. M. Slaten, S. B. Berenson and C. Seaman, On the impact of a collaborative pedagogy on African American millennial students in software engineering, in Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07), 2007.

Digital Library

Cited By

Dors Tde Almeida AMussi LBinder FReinehr SMalucelli ARoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey MGama KSiegmund J(2024)Training App Developers in a Software Studio: The Business Nano Challenge ExperienceProceedings of the 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training10.1145/3639474.3640070(82-92)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639474.3640070
Kirk DLuxton-Reilly ATempero E(2023)Evaluating Student Risk Group Mitigation StrategiesIEEE Software10.1109/MS.2023.331046840:6(79-86)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/MS.2023.3310468
Kirk DLuxton-Reilly ATempero E(2022)Risks in Student ProjectsProceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference10.1145/3511861.3511877(143-152)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3511861.3511877
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Things coming together: learning experiences in a software studio
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education

Recommendations

SE2004: Recommendations for Undergraduate Software Engineering Curricula

The recommendations in Software Engineering 2004: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering, form a volume of the larger Computing Curriculum project of the IEEE-CS and ACM. SE2004 evolved from an analysis of ...
Software design studio: a practical example
ICSE '15: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 2

We have been generally successful for transferring software engineering knowledge to industry through various forms of education. However, many challenges in software engineering training remain. A key amongst these is how best to energise software ...
Bringing together undergraduate and postgraduate students in software engineering team project: experiences and lessons
ITiCSE 2018: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Software Engineering education requires exposing students to real-world problems providing a framework to simulate real-world conditions. For this purpose, computer science students usually work in teams with each member undertaking a specific role. In ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ITiCSE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education

June 2014

378 pages

ISBN:9781450328333

DOI:10.1145/2591708

Conference Chairs:
Åsa Cajander
Uppsala University, Sweden
,
Mats Daniels
Uppsala University, Sweden
,
Program Chairs:
Tony Clear
Auckland University of Technology, NZ
,
Arnold Pears
Uppsala University, Sweden

Copyright © 2014 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Bilkent University: Bilkent University
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ITICSE '14

Sponsor:

Bilkent University
SIGCSE

ITICSE '14: Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference 2014

June 21 - 25, 2014

Uppsala, Sweden

Acceptance Rates

ITiCSE '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 164 submissions, 22%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
150
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)6
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 20 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Dors Tde Almeida AMussi LBinder FReinehr SMalucelli ARoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey MGama KSiegmund J(2024)Training App Developers in a Software Studio: The Business Nano Challenge ExperienceProceedings of the 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training10.1145/3639474.3640070(82-92)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639474.3640070
Kirk DLuxton-Reilly ATempero E(2023)Evaluating Student Risk Group Mitigation StrategiesIEEE Software10.1109/MS.2023.331046840:6(79-86)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/MS.2023.3310468
Kirk DLuxton-Reilly ATempero E(2022)Risks in Student ProjectsProceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference10.1145/3511861.3511877(143-152)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3511861.3511877
Kang LJackson SPinch T(2022)The ElectronicistsProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517506(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3517506
Andrade AAlbuquerque RMara Dors TVinicius Binder FMalucelli AReinehr S(2021)Education, Innovation and Software ProductionProceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality10.1145/3493244.3493265(1-10)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3493244.3493265
Kang LJackson S(2021)Tech-Art-TheoryProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34491565:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3449156
Bone DGay VBrookes WTrede FBraun R(2021)Roadshow Presentations for Developing Presentation and Feedback Skills in Studio Based Learning2021 19th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET)10.1109/ITHET50392.2021.9759758(01-11)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET50392.2021.9759758
Cico OJaccheri LNguyen-Duc AZhang H(2021)Exploring the intersection between software industry and Software Engineering education - A systematic mapping of Software Engineering TrendsJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2020.110736172(110736)Online publication date: Feb-2021
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110736
Ott CLiesaputra VLuxton-Reilly ASzabo C(2020)Industry-Focused Projects in an Intense One-Year ICT ProgrammeProceedings of the Twenty-Second Australasian Computing Education Conference10.1145/3373165.3373180(132-141)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3373165.3373180
Trede FBraun RBrookes W(2020)Engineering students’ expectations and perceptions of studio-based learningEuropean Journal of Engineering Education10.1080/03043797.2020.1758630(1-14)Online publication date: 6-May-2020
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1758630
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents