Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Evaluating Student Risk Group Mitigation Strategies

Published: 05 September 2023 Publication History

Abstract

We analyzed reports from three courses based on an existing risk framework for academic projects. Our contribution is a set of insights that we will apply in the creation of a risk mitigation resource for students.

References

[1]
T. Ahtee and T. Poranen, “Risks in students’ software projects,” in Proc. 22nd Conf. Softw. Eng. Educ. Training (CSEET’09), New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2009, pp. 154–157.
[2]
C. Anslow and F. Maurer, “An experience report at teaching a group based agile software development project course,” in Proc. 46th ACM Techn. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ. (Kansas City, MO, USA) (SIGCSE), New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015, pp. 500–505.
[3]
J. Khakurel and J. Porras, “The effect of real-world capstone project in an acquisition of soft skills among software engineering students,” in Proc. IEEE 32nd Conf. Softw. Eng. Educ. Training (CSEE&T), 2020, pp. 1–9.
[4]
D. Kirk, A. Luxton - Reilly, and E. Tempero, “Risks in student projects,” in Proc. Australas. Comput. Educ. Conf. (Virtual Event, Australia) (ACE), New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2022, pp. 143–152.
[5]
Ø. Nytrø, A. Nguyen-Duc, H. Trætteberg, M. Lorås, and B. Amin Farschian, “Unreined students or not: Modes of freedom in a project-based software engineering course,” in Proc. IEEE 32nd Conf. Softw. Eng. Educ. Training (CSEE&T), 2020, pp. 1–10.
[6]
C. Ott and V. Liesaputra, “Industry-focused projects in an intense one-year ICT programme,” in Proc. 22nd Australas. Comput. Educ. Conf. (ACE), Melbourne, Australia: Australian Computer Society, 2020, pp. 132–141.
[7]
J. Prior, A. Connor, and J. Leaney, “Things coming together: Learning experiences in a software studio,” in Proc. Conf. Innov. Technol. Comput. Sci. Educ. (Uppsala, Sweden) (ITiCSE), New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 129–134.
[8]
M. Shepperd, “Group project work from the outset: An in-depth teaching experience report,” in Proc. 24th IEEE-CS Conf. Softw. Eng. Educ. Training (CSEE&T), 2011, pp. 361–370.
[9]
A. Sixsmith and A. Litchfield, “Improving the learning of graduate attributes in the curriculum: A case-study in IT management,” in Proc. 12th Australas. Conf. Comput. Educ., Brisbane, Australia: Australian Computer Society, 2010, vol. 103, pp. 155–164.
[10]
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Newtown Square, PA, USA: Project Management Inst., 2017.
[11]
S. Buehring, “Prince2® vs the Pmbok® guide: A comparison,” Knowledge Train, London, U.K., 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.knowledgetrain.co.uk/project-management/pmi/prince2-and-pmbok-guide-comparison
[12]
SWEBOK v3.0: Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge,” IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.computer.org/education/bodies-of-knowledge/software-engineering
[13]
D. P. Gluch, “A construct for describing software development risks,” Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Tech. Rep., 1994.
[14]
S. Koolmanojwong and B. Boehm, “A look at software engineering risks in a team project course,” in Proc. 26th Int. Conf. Softw. Eng. Educ. Training (CSEET), 2013, pp. 21–30.
[15]
S. Mann and L. Smith, “Software engineering class eating its own tail,” in Proc. 9th Australas. Conf. Comput. Educ. (ACE), Australian Computer Society, AUS, 2007, vol. 66, pp. 115–123.
[16]
J.-G. Schneider, P. W. Eklund, K. Lee, F. Chen, A. Cain, and M. Abdelrazek, “Adopting industry agile practices in large-scale capstone education,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE 42nd Int. Conf. Softw. Eng., Softw. Eng. Educ. Training (ICSE-SEET), New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020, pp. 119–129.
[17]
D. Kirk, A. Luxton - Reilly, and E. Tempero, “Refining a risk framework for student group projects,” in Proc. 22nd Koli Calling Int. Conf. Comput. Educ. Res. (Koli, Finland), New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2022, p. 11.
[18]
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.
[19]
M. Williams and T. Moser, “The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research,” Int. Manage. Rev., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 2019.
[20]
Systems and Software Engineering – Lifecycle Processes – Risk Management, IEEE Standards ISO/IEC/IEEE 16085:2021.

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating Student Risk Group Mitigation Strategies
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image IEEE Software
      IEEE Software  Volume 40, Issue 6
      Nov.-Dec. 2023
      141 pages

      Publisher

      IEEE Computer Society Press

      Washington, DC, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 05 September 2023

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 0
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 20 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media