Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2470714acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Probing bus stop for insights on transit co-design

Published: 27 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Social computing provides a new way for citizens to engage with their public service. Our research investigates how social computing might support citizens co-design their transit service. We conducted a field study with public transit riders, exploring the issues and controversies that reveal conflicting communities. Our analyses revealed three insights. First, encourage citizens to share what they see as the rationale for current service offerings. Second, encourage citizens to share the consequences of current services and of proposed changes and new designs. Third, focus on producing a shared citizen and service provider understanding of what the goals and mission of the public service should be.

References

[1]
Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjögren, D. and Sundblad, Y. Co-Operative Design: Perspectives on 20 Years with 'the Scandinavian IT Design Model'. In Proc. of NordiCHI, (2000) ACM Press, 22--24.
[2]
Brabham, D. C. Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory, 8, 3 (2009), 242--262.
[3]
Bradwell, P. and Marr, S. Making the Most of Collaboration an International Survey of Public Service Co-Design. DEMOS, in association with PriceWaterhouseCoopers Public Sector Research Centre, London, 2008.
[4]
Chango, M. Challenges to e-government in Africa south of Sahara. In Proc. of the Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (2007).
[5]
Cho, J. S., Chun, S. A. Towards transparent policy decision making process. In Proc. of Digital Government Research Conference, (2011).
[6]
DiSalvo, C. Design and the Construction of Publics. Design Issues, 25, 1 (2009), 48--63.
[7]
Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, A. and Roos, I. Service Portraits in Service Research: A Critical Review. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16, 1 (2005), 107--121.
[8]
Evans-Cowley, J. S. Crowdsourcing the Curriculum: Public Participation in Redesigning a Planning Program. Working Paper, (February 12, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1760525
[9]
Gaver, W. W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Cultural Probes. interactions, 6,1 (1999) 21--29.
[10]
Goldstein, S. M., Johnston, R., Duffy, J. A. and Rao, J. The Service Concept: The Missing Link in Service Design Research? Journal of Operations Management, 20, 2 (2002), 121--134.
[11]
Hirsch, T. Contestational Design: Innovation for political activism. Dissertation. MIT, Dept. of Architecture, Program in Media Arts and Sciences, (2006).
[12]
Holmlid, S. Participative, Co-Operative, Emancipatory: From Participatory Design to Service Design. In Proceedings of Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation, (2009) Oslo School of Architecture and Design.
[13]
Janowski, T., Ojo, A. and Estevez, E. Rapid Development of Electronic Public Services: A Case Study in Electronic Licensing Service. In Proc of Conference on Digital Government Research, (2007) Digital Government Society of North America, 292--293.
[14]
Kaschesky, M., Riedl, R. Top-level decisions through public deliberation on the internet. In Proc. Of the Conference on Digital Government Research, (2009).
[15]
Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J. and Wensveen, S. Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 2011.
[16]
King, S. F. and Brown, P. Fix My Street or Else: Using the Internet to Voice Local Public Service Concerns. In Proc. of Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (2007) ACM Press. 72--80.
[17]
Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M. M. Public online consultation of federal ministries and federal regulatory agencies in Brazil. In Proc. of the Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (2009).
[18]
Ng, I. C. L., Maull, R. S. and Smith, L. Embedding the New Discipline of Service Science. In The Science of Service Systems. H. Demirkan, J. H. Spohrer and V. Krishna (eds). Springer, 2009.
[19]
ParkScan: http://parkscan.org/
[20]
Petrik, K. Participation and e-democracy how to utilize web 2.0 for policy decision-making. In Proc. of the Conference on Digital Government Research, (2009).
[21]
Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, V. Co-Opting Customer Competence. Harvard Business Review, 78, 1 (2000), 79--90.
[22]
Qian, H. Global perspectives on e-governance. In Proc. of the Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (2010).
[23]
Rodrigo, D., Amo, P. A. (2006): Background Document on Public Consultation. OECD, Paris.
[24]
Saad-Sulonen, J. and Cabrera, A. B. Setting up a Public Participation Project Using the Urban Mediator Tool: A Case of Collaboration between Designers and City Planners. In Proc. of NordiCHI, (2008) ACM Press, 539--542.
[25]
Saad-Sulonen, J., Botero, A. and Kuutti, K. A Long-Term Strategy for Designing (in) the Wild: Lessons from the Urban Mediator and Traffic Planning in Helsinki. In Proc. of DIS (2012) ACM Press, 166--175
[26]
Shostack, G. L. How to Design a Service. In European Journal of Marketing 16, 1 (1982), 49--63.
[27]
Strauss, A., Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative, 2nd Ed. SAGE Publications, 1998.
[28]
Tomkins, A. J., PytlikZilllig, L. M., Herian, M. N., Abdel-Monem, T., Hamm, J. A. (2010): Public input for municipal policymaking. In Proc of the Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online.
[29]
US Census Bureau (2010): http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/acsbr09-5.pdf Accessed: September 1, 2012.Winner, L. "Do Artifacts Have Politics?" in The Whale and The Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
[30]
Yoo, D., Zimmerman, J., Steinfeld, A., and Tomasic, A. Understanding the Space for Co-Design in Riders' Interactions with a Transit Service. In Proc of CHI, (2010) ACM Press, 1797--1806.
[31]
Zimmeramn, J., Tomasic, A., Garrod, C., Yoo, D., Hiruncharoenvate, C., Aziz, R., Thiruvengadam, N. R., Huang, Y., and Steinfeld, A. Field Trial of Tiramisu: Crowd-Sourcing Bus Arrival Times to Spur Co-Design. In Proc of CHI, (2011) ACM Press, 1677--1686.
[32]
Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proc. of CHI, (2007) ACM Press, 493--502.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)“The bus is nothing without us”: Making Visible the Labor of Bus Operators amid the Ongoing Push Towards Transit AutomationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642714(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)The Development of Human-Centered Design in Public Transportation: A Literature ReviewHCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems10.1007/978-3-031-60480-5_3(40-62)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
  • (2022)How HCI Adopts Service DesignProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502128(1-14)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Probing bus stop for insights on transit co-design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2013
    3550 pages
    ISBN:9781450318990
    DOI:10.1145/2470654
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 April 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. co-design
    2. contestational design
    3. egovernment
    4. political design
    5. public service
    6. service design
    7. social computing
    8. transit

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 392 of 1,963 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)“The bus is nothing without us”: Making Visible the Labor of Bus Operators amid the Ongoing Push Towards Transit AutomationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642714(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)The Development of Human-Centered Design in Public Transportation: A Literature ReviewHCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems10.1007/978-3-031-60480-5_3(40-62)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
    • (2022)How HCI Adopts Service DesignProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502128(1-14)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Metro Futures 2020: Enabling Participation at Varying Depths and Scales via Digital TechnologyInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2022.210208539:18(3663-3683)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2022
    • (2021)Priorities, Technology, & Power: Co-Designing an Inclusive Transit Agenda in Kampala, UgandaProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445168(1-11)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
    • (2021)How HCI Interprets Service Design: A Systematic Literature ReviewHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202110.1007/978-3-030-85616-8_16(259-280)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2021
    • (2017)How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR’s Rehabilitation Engineering Research CentersJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation10.1186/s12984-017-0321-314:1Online publication date: 6-Nov-2017
    • (2017)City ExplorerProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3027063.3053252(2825-2832)Online publication date: 6-May-2017
    • (2015)Designing with Emerging PublicsProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2702613.2702616(243-246)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2015
    • (2014)Making wellbeingProceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems10.1145/2598510.2600888(755-764)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2014
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media