COP14NR Indonesia e

NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION
OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS
National Reports to be submitted to the 14th Meeting

of the Conference of the Contracting Parties,
Wuhan, China, 2021
The purpose of this Microsoft Word form is to help Contracting Parties to

collect data for the National Report. However, the data collected through
this form must be transferred to the online national reporting system at
https://reports.ramsar.org, or the Word form must be sent by email to
nationalreports@ramsar.org, by 21 January 2021 for the official submission
of the National Report. If you have any questions or problems, please
contact the Ramsar Secretariat for advice (nationalreports@ramsar.org).
Please note that for Contracting Parties wishing to provide information in the
online reporting system on national targets (optional Section 4 of the
National Report Format or on the Word form), the deadline is
24 January 2020.
Ramsar COP14 National Report Format (NRF)
Background information
1. The COP14 National Report Format (NRF) has been approved by the Standing Committee at its
57th meeting (SC57) for the Ramsar Convention’s Contracting Parties to complete as their
national reporting to the 14th meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties of the
Convention.
2. The NRF is being issued by the Secretariat in 2019 to facilitate Contracting Parties’
implementation planning and preparations for completing the Report. The deadline for
submission of national targets is 24 January 2020 and the deadline for submission of completed
National Reports is 21 January 2021 (final dates will be updated once the dates for COP14 are
agreed).
3. This COP14 NRF closely follows that used for COP13, to permit continuity of reporting and
analysis of implementation progress by ensuring that indicator questions are as far as possible
consistent with previous NRFs (and especially the COP13 NRF). It is also structured in terms of
the Goals and Strategies of the 2016-2024 Ramsar Strategic Plan adopted at COP12 through
Resolution XII.2.
4. This COP14 NRF includes 90 indicator questions. In addition, Section 4 is provided as an

optional annex in order to facilitate the task of preparing the Party’s national targets and
actions for the implementation of each of the Targets of the Strategic Plan 2016-2024 in
accordance with Resolution XII.2.
5. As was the case for previous NRFs, the COP14 NRF includes an optional section (Section 5) to
permit a Contracting Party to provide additional information on indicators relevant to each
individual Wetland of International Importance (Ramsar Site) within its territory.
6. Note that, for the purposes of this national reporting to the Ramsar Convention, the scope of
the term “wetland” is that of the Convention text, i.e. all inland wetlands (including lakes and
rivers), all nearshore coastal wetlands (including tidal marshes, mangroves and coral reefs) and
human-made wetlands (e.g. rice paddy and reservoirs), even if a national definition of
“wetland” may differ from that adopted by the Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention.
The purposes and uses of national reporting to the Conference of the Contracting Parties
7. National Reports from Contracting Parties are official documents of the Convention and are
made publicly available on the Convention’s website.
8. There are seven main purposes for the Convention’s National Reports. These are:
i) to provide data and information on how, and to what extent, the Convention is being
implemented;
ii) to provide tools for countries for their national planning;
iii) to capture lessons and experience to help Parties plan future action;
iv) to identify emerging issues and implementation challenges faced by Parties that may
require further attention from the Conference of the Parties;
v) to provide a means for Parties to account for their commitments under the Convention;
2
vi) to provide each Party with a tool to help it assess and monitor its progress in implementing
the Convention, and to plan its future priorities; and
vii) to provide an opportunity for Parties to draw attention to their achievements during the
triennium.
9. The data and information provided by Parties in their National Reports have another valuable
purpose as well, since a number of the indicators in the National Reports on Parties’
implementation provide key sources of information for the analysis and assessment of the
“ecological outcome-oriented indicators of effectiveness of the implementation of the
Convention”.
10. To facilitate the analysis and subsequent use of the data and information provided by
Contracting Parties in their National Reports, the Ramsar Secretariat holds in a database all the
information it has received and verified. As for COP13, the COP14 reports will be in an online
national reporting system.
11. The Convention’s National Reports are used in a number of ways. These include:
i) providing an opportunity to compile and analyze information that contracting parties can
use to inform their national planning and programming;
ii) providing the basis for reporting by the Secretariat to each meeting of the Conference of
the Parties on the global, national and regional implementation, and the progress in
implementation, of the Convention. This is provided to Parties at the COP as a series of
Information Papers, including:
 the Report of the Secretary General on the implementation of the Convention at the
global level; and
 the Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 (b), (c), and (d) concerning
the List of Wetlands of International Importance);
iii) providing information on specific implementation issues in support of the provision of

advice and decisions by Parties at the COP;
iv) providing the source data for time-series assessments of progress on specific aspects in the
implementation of the Convention included in other Convention products. An example is
the summary of progress since COP3 (Regina, 1997) in the development of National
Wetland Policies, included as Table 1 in Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 2 (4th edition, 2010);
and
v) providing information for reporting to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) on the
national implementation of the CBD/Ramsar Joint Work Plan and the Ramsar Convention’s
lead implementation role on wetlands for the CBD. In particular, the Ramsar Secretariat
and STRP used the COP10 NRF indicators extensively in 2009 to prepare contributions to
the in-depth review of the CBD programme of work on the biological diversity of inland
water ecosystems for consideration by CBD SBSTTA14 and COP10 during 2010 (see
UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/3). Similar use of COP13 NRF indicators is anticipated for the CBD’s
post-2020 global biodiversity framework.
3
The structure of the COP14 National Report Format
12. The COP14 National Report Format (NRF) is in five sections:
Section 1 provides the institutional information about the Administrative Authority and
National Focal Points for the national implementation of the Convention.
Section 2 is a ‘free-text’ section in which the Party is invited to provide a summary of various
aspects of national implementation progress and recommendations for the future.
Section 3 provides the 90 implementation indicator questions, grouped under each Convention
implementation Goals and Targets in the Strategic Plan 2016-2024, and with an optional ‘free-
text’ section under each indicator question in which the Contracting Party may, if it wishes, add
further information on national implementation of that activity.
Section 4 is an optional annex to allow any Contracting Party that has developed national
targets to provide information on the targets and actions for the implementation of each of the
targets of the Strategic Plan 2016-2024.
In line with Resolution XII.2, which encourages Contracting Parties “to develop and submit to
the Secretariat on or before December 2016, and according to their national priorities,
capabilities and resources, their own quantifiable and time-bound national and regional targets
in line with the targets set in the Strategic Plan”, all Parties are encouraged to consider using
this comprehensive national planning tool as soon as possible, in order to identify the areas of
highest priority for action and the relevant national targets and actions for each target.
The planning of national targets offers, for each of them, the possibility of indicating the
national priority for that area of activity as well as the level of resourcing available, or that could
be made available during the triennium, for its implementation. In addition, there are specific
boxes to indicate the National Targets for implementation by 2021 and the planned national
activities that are designed to deliver these targets.
Ramsar Strategic Plan 2016-2024 shows the synergies between CBD Aichi Biodiversity Targets
and Ramsar Targets. Therefore, the NRF provide an opportunity that Contracting Parties
indicate as appropriate how the actions they undertake for the implementation of the Ramsar
Convention contribute to achievement of the Aichi Targets according to paragraph 51 of
Resolution XII.3.
Section 5 is an optional annex to allow any Contracting Party that so wishes to provide
additional information regarding any or all of its Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar
Sites).
General guidance for completing and submitting the COP14 National Report Format
Important – please read this guidance section before starting to complete the National Report
format
13. All Sections of the COP14 NRF should be completed in one of the Convention’s official
languages (English, French, Spanish).
4
14. The deadline for submission of the completed NRF is January 21st 2021. It will not be possible
to include information from National Reports received after that date in the analysis and
reporting on Convention implementation to COP14.
15. The deadline for submission of national targets is by 24 January 2020.
16. All fields with a pale yellow background must be filled in.
Fields with a pale green background are free-text fields in which to provide
additional information, if the Contracting Party so wishes. Although providing information
in these fields is optional, Contracting Parties are encouraged to provide such additional
information wherever possible and relevant, as it helps us understand Parties’ progress and
activity more fully, to prepare the best possible global and regional implementation reports
to COP.
17. To help Contracting Parties refer to relevant information they provided in their National Report
to COP13, for each appropriate indicator a cross-reference is provided to the equivalent
indicator(s) in the COP13 NRF or previous NRF, shown thus: {x.x.x}
18. For follow up and where appropriate, a cross-reference is also provided to the relevant Key
Result Area (KRA) relating to Contracting Parties implementation in the Strategic Plan 2009-
2015.
19. Only Strategic Plan 2016-2024 Targets for which there are implementation actions for
Contracting Parties are included in this reporting format. Those targets of the Strategic Plan that
do not refer directly to Parties are omitted in the National Report Format as the information is
provided through the Ramsar Sites Data Base or the Work Plan of the Scientific and Technical
Review Panel (e.g. targets 6 and 14).
20. The Format is created as a form in Microsoft Word to collect the data. You will be able to enter
replies and information in the yellow or green boxes.
For each of the ‘indicator questions’ in Section 3, a legend of answer options is provided. These
vary between indicators, depending on the question, but are generally of the form: ‘A - Yes’, ‘B -
No’, ‘C - Partially’, ‘D - In progress’. This is necessary so that statistical comparisons can be made
of the replies. Please indicate the relevant letter (A, B etc.) in the yellow field.
For each indicator question you can choose only one answer. If you wish to provide further
information or clarification, do so in the green additional information box below the relevant
indicator question. Please be as concise as possible (maximum of 500 words in each free-text
box).
21. In Section 4 (Optional) for each target the planning of national targets section looks as follows
(in the example of Target 8 on inventory):
Planning of National Targets

Priority of the target: A= High; B= Medium; C= Low; D= Not relevant; E= No
answer
Resourcing: A= Good; B= Adequate; C= Limiting; D= Severely
limiting; E= No answer
5
National Targets (Text [Example text] To have comprehensive inventory of all wetlands by
Answer): 2021
Planned Activities [Example text] To update the existing inventory so as to cover all the
(Text Answer): national territory, and to incorporate relevant information about
wetlands, including digital information, when possible
Outcomes achieved by 2021 [Example text] A comprehensive inventory of all wetlands
and how they contribute to
achievement of the Aichi
Targets and Sustainable
Development Goals
Note: this field has to be

completed when the full
report is submitted in
January 2021
The input has to be made only in the yellow boxes. For PRIORITY and RESOURCING, the coded
answers are given in the right part of the table (always in italics). The answer chosen should be
typed inside the yellow box at the left side of the coded options. TARGETS and PLANNED
ACTIVITIES are text boxes; here, Contracting Parties are invited to provide more detailed
information in the respective box on their National Targets for achievement in implementation
by 2021 and the planned national activities that are designed to deliver these targets.
Please note that only ONE coded option –the one that better represents the situation in the
Contracting Party– should be chosen. Blanks will be coded in COP14 National Reports
Database as “No answer”.
22. The NRF should ideally be completed by the principal compiler in consultation with relevant
colleagues in their agency and others within the government and, as appropriate, with NGOs
and other stakeholders who might have fuller knowledge of aspects of the Party’s overall
implementation of the Convention. The principal compiler can save the document at any point
and return to it later to continue or to amend answers. Compilers should refer back to the
National Report submitted for COP13 to ensure the continuity and consistency of information
provided. In the online system there is an option to allow consultation with others.
23. After each session, remember to save the file. A recommended filename structure is:
COP14NRF [Country] [date], for example: COP14NRFSpain13January 2021.doc
24. After the NRF has been completed using the word version (offline), please enter the data in the
NR online system at this link: https://reports.ramsar.org or send it by email
(nationalreports@ramsar.org) by January 21st 2021. If you have any questions or problems,
please contact the Ramsar Secretariat for advice at (nationalreports@ramsar.org).
25. The completed NRF must be accompanied by a letter that can be uploaded in the online
system or send by email (nationalreports@ramsar.org) in the name of the Head of
Administrative Authority, confirming that this is the Contracting Party’s official submission of
its COP14 National Report.
If you have any questions or problems, please contact the Ramsar Secretariat for advice
(nationalreports@ramsar.org).
6
National Report to Ramsar COP14
Section 1: Institutional information

Important note: the responses below will be considered by the Ramsar Secretariat as the
definitive list of your focal points, and will be used to update the information it holds. The
Secretariat’s current information about your focal points is available at
https://www.ramsar.org/search?f%5B0%5D=type%3Aperson#search-contacts.
Name of Contracting Party:INDONESIA
Designated Ramsar Administrative Authority

Directorate General of Ecosystem and Natural Resources
Name of Administrative Authority: Conservation, The Indonesian Ministry of Environment
and Forestry
Mr. Wiratno
Head of Administrative Authority -
(Director General of Ecosystem and Natural Resources
name and title:
Conservation)
Ministry of Environment and Forestry
Manggala Wanabhakti building, Block I, 8th Floor,
Mailing address:
Jl. Gatot Subroto
Jakarta Pusat, Post Code 10270
Telephone/Fax: +6221-5730315/ +6225734818
Email:tu_setditjen_phka@yahoo.com;
ditbpee.djksdae@gmail.com
Designated National Focal Point for Ramsar Convention Matters
Mr. Asep Sugiharta
Name and title:
(Director of Essential Ecosystem Management)
Ministry of Environment and Forestry
Mailing address: Manggala Wanabhakti Building, Block VII, 14th Floor,
Jl. Gatot Subroto, Jakarta Pusat, Post code 10270
Telephone/Fax: Telp/ fax : +62215746336
asepsugiharta@gmail.com, febry.iskandar@gmail.com,
Email:
geneva@mission-indonesia.org
Designated National Focal Point for Matters Relating to The Scientific and Technical Review
Panel (STRP)
Ms. Sulastri
Name and title:
(Senior researcher on limnology studies)
Name of organisation: Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI)
Pusat Penelitian Limnologi LIPI
Mailing address: Jl. Raya Bogor, Cibinong, Bogor, Jawa Barat 16911,
Indonesia
Telephone/Fax: +6285711741450
Email: sulastri@limnologi. Lipi.go.id
Designated Government National Focal Point for Matters Relating to The Programme on
Communication, Education, Participation and Awareness (CEPA)
Ms. Indra Exploitasia
Name and title:
(Director of Biodiversity Conservation)
7
Directorate of Biodiversity Conservation, Ministry of
Name of organisation:
Environment and Forestry
Ministry of Environment and Forestry,
Manggala Wanabhakti Building, Block VII, 7th Floor
Mailing address:
Jl. Gatot Subroto Street
Jakarta Pusat Post code 10270
Email: dit.kkh@gmail.com
Designated Non-Government National Focal Point for Matters Relating to The Programme on
Communication, Education, Participation and Awareness (CEPA)
Ms. Yus Rusila Noor
Name and title:
(Head of Programmes, Wetlands International Indonesia)
Yayasan Lahan Basah (YLBA)/Wetlands International
Name of organisation:
Indonesia
Jl. Bango No.11, RT.06/RW.04, Tanah Sareal, Kec. Tanah
Mailing address:
Sereal, Kota Bogor, Jawa Barat 16161
Email: noor@wetlands.or.id
8
Section 2: General summary of national implementation progress and
challenges
In your country, in the past triennium (i.e., since COP13 reporting):
A. What have been the five most successful aspects of implementation of the Convention?
1) The establishment of “Essential Ecosystem Areas” (defined as Wetlands Areas out of
conservation area with High Conservation Value, Mangrove Areas and Karst Areas),
covering a total area of 597,890.62 Ha.
2) The issuance of a Ministerial Decree on the establishment of Strategic Coordination Team
on the Wetlands Management to Fulfill the Implementation of Sustainable Development
Goals dan Low Carbon Development (Ministerial Decree of National Development
Planning/ Head of National Development Planning Agency No. KEP.89/M.PPN/HK/10/2020.
3) Successfully built 7 water reservoirs, rehabilitated River Catchment Areas and improved
number of water springs within 15 priority River Catchment Areas, as mandated in the
National Mid-term Development Planning for the 2015 – 2019 period.
4) Improving the sustainable mangrove management by integrating mangrove rehabilitation
projects into the country’ post-Covid-19 economic recovery policy (Pemulihan Ekonomi
Nasional/PEN).
5) Increasing number and intensity of education and awareness-raising activities on the
importance of wetland conservation, among others through the celebration of World
Wetlands Day. In 2020, for example, WWD celebrations were held in several provinces
across Indonesia, including Aceh Province, South Tapanuli (North Sumatra Province),
Pekanbaru (Riau Province), Ogan Komering Ilir (South Sumatra Province), East Lampung
(Lampung Province), Serang (Banten Province), Klaten and Demak (Central Java Province),
Sikka, Flores (East Nusa Tenggara Province), Pulang Pisau (Central Kalimantan Province),
and Gorontalo (Gorontalo Province)
B. What have been the five greatest difficulties in implementing the Convention?
1) Coordinate policies and actions on wetland management among different stakeholders
2) Preparing and updating the National Wetlands Inventory, including wetland mapping (such as
the determination of the high conservation value areas and karst mapping)
3) Difference in stakeholders’ understanding regarding wetlands definition and types. For
example, limited understanding on karst criteria prevents a common understanding on high
conservation value areas
4) Due to the current Covid-19 pandemic condition, several activities and coordination efforts in
the field have been significantly hampered.
5) Lack of resources (human resources, funds, etc.) necessary to restore wetlands
C. What are the five priorities for future implementation of the Convention?
1) Increasing the social economy standard of community living around wetland areas
9
2) Active community engagement in wetland conservation and restoration, and support local
wisdom/community culture in wetland management
3) Synergizing wetland management programs and activities among stakeholders (central
government, local government, private sector, academics, NGOs, communities)
4) Mainstreaming wetland conservation in development planning of local governments
5) Increasing the effectiveness of the management of essential ecosystem areas
D. Do you (AA) have any recommendations concerning priorities for implementation assistance
and requirements for such assistance from the Ramsar Secretariat?
1) To speed up the acceptance of new Ramsar Sites proposed by the Republic of Indonesia
2) Capacity building for Ramsar site managers
3) Knowledge exchange visits/share learning to other Ramsar Sites within Ramsar's contracting
parties
4) Scholarships for wetland managers
5) International workshop on wetlands management
6) International workshop on local community wisdom on Wetland Management
7) Regular webinars with experts and practitioners on wetlands (technical and management)
issues
8) Mailing lists of wetlands managers, experts and other stakeholders
E. Do you (AA) have any recommendations concerning implementation assistance from the
Convention’s International Organisation Partners (IOPs)? (including ongoing partnerships and
partnerships to develop)
IOPs should be more pro-active in supporting Contracting Parties in developing wetlands'
management plan, community development program, natural resources inventory and
monitoring and advocation, as well as capacity building. Regarding national target under the
Convention, it should be noted that wetland management in one country is often carried out
by different authorities. Therefore, the Convention needs to provide guidance and assistance
on how national target should be implemented in complex inter-agencies coordination
context.
F. How can national implementation of the Ramsar Convention be better linked with
implementation of other multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), especially those in the
‘biodiversity cluster’ (Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Convention on Migratory Species
(CMS), Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), World Heritage
Convention (WHC), and United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) and the
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)?
10
The Ramsar Convention should explore possible area of cooperation, mobilize resources and
carry out joint research on issues where wetland conservation has strong relations with other
issues under other Conventions. Meeting, sharing experience and workshops involving
different Conventions, including among National Focal Points, are essential to ensure close
cooperation between the Ramsar Convention and other bio-diversity Conventions.
G. How is the Ramsar Convention linked with the implementation of water policy/strategy and
other strategies in the country (e.g., on sustainable development, energy, extractive industries,
poverty reduction, sanitation, food security, biodiversity) and how this could be improved?
 Regarding the water policy and strategy, it is important to also include the land subsidence
issue. The land subsidence in coastal areas have strong connection with wetland
degradation, particularly in coastal wetlands.
 In relation to the lake management, the sustainable lake management
is integrated to the country’s Regional Spatial Planning and National Mid-Term
Development Planning, in addition to the related strategic planning. Indonesia believes that
the sustainable lake management should be more mainstreamed in the Ramsar
Convention, including through a resolution discussed and adopted in COP 14.
 Indonesia initiated and facilitated collaborative management on lake management, such as
the establishment of Malili Lake Management Forum (Forum Peduli Kompleks Danau
Malili), engaging multi-stakeholders, including government, community, civil societies,
researcher, experts, knowledge institutes and private sector, aimed to protect, conserve
and sustainable use of the lake.
 Indonesia develops the inventory of important lakes in Wallacea region as “Key Biodiversity
Area” by using single-site endemic. Globally threatened freshwater species as trigger
species have been conducted and been acknowledged by stakeholders
H. According to paragraph 21 of Resolution XIII.18 on Gender and wetlands, please provide a short
description about the balance between men and women participating in wetland-related
decisions, programmes and research
 The Indonesia Government has set general policies on the mainstreaming of gender-
balance on country’s development program, which has to also be applied on the
management of wetlands
 The national development strategy includes a gender perspective to achieve a more
equitable development for all Indonesian citizens, both men and women. Indicators: 1)
Gender Development Index (IPG) 2) Gender Empowerment Index (IDG)
 By 2025, it is targeted that the quality of life for women will be improved, followed by an
increase in gender equality in all areas of development
 Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. P.13 of 2017 concerning Guidelines
for Gender Mainstreaming in the Environment and Forestry Sector
I. Do you (AA) have any other general comments on the implementation of the Convention?
We are believing on the importance of the mainstreaming of Ramsar’s principles on the
management of wetlands in every sectors
J. Please list the names of the organisations which have been consulted on or have contributed to
the information provided in this report:
1. Indonesia Institute of Science (LIPI)
11
2. Ministry of Environment and Forestry (KLHK)
3. Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKP)
4. Ministry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency
(KemenPPN/ Bappenas)
5. Peatlands Restoration Agency (BRG)
6. Coordinating Ministry on Maritime and Investment (KemenkoMarves)
7. Ministry of Agriculture (Kementan)
8. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (KemenESDM)
9. Ministry of Health (Kemenkes)
10. Ministry of Women and Children Empowerment (KemenPemberdayaan Perempuan dan
Anak)
11. Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing (KemenPUPR)
12. Ministry of Internal Affairs (Kemendagri)
13. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Kemenlu)
14. Yayasan Lahan Basah (Wetlands International Indonesia)
15. Burung Indonesia
12
Section 3: Indicator questions and further implementation information
Goal 1. Addressing the drivers of wetland loss and degradation

[Reference to Sustainable Development Goals 1, 2, 6, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15]
Target 1. Wetland benefits are featured in national/ local policy strategies and plans relating to key
sectors such as water, energy, mining, agriculture, tourism, urban development, infrastructure,
industry, forestry, aquaculture, fisheries at the national and local level.
[Reference to Aichi Target 2]
1.1 Have wetland conservation and the identification of wetlands benefits been integrated into
sustainable approaches to the following national strategies and planning processes,
including: {1.3.2} {1.3.3} KRA 1.3.i
A=Yes; B=No; C=Partially; D=Planned; X= Unknown; Y= Not Relevant
a) National Policy or strategy for wetland management: A=Yes
b) Poverty eradication strategies: A=Yes
c) Water resource management and water efficiency plans: A=Yes
d) Coastal and marine resource management plans: A=Yes
e) Integrated Coastal Zone Management Plan: A=Yes
f) National forest programmes: A=Yes
g) National policies or measures on agriculture: A=Yes
h) National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans drawn up under the CBD: A=Yes
i) National policies on energy and mining: A=Yes
j) National policies on tourism: A=Yes
k) National policies on urban development: A=Yes
l) National policies on infrastructure: A=Yes
m) National policies on industry: A=Yes
n) National policies on aquaculture and fisheries {1.3.3} KRA 1.3.i: A=Yes
o) National plans of actions (NPAs) for pollution control and management: A=Yes
p) National policies on wastewater management and water quality: A=Yes
1.1 Additional information:
Target 2. Water use respects wetland ecosystem needs for them to fulfil their functions and provide
services at the appropriate scale inter alia at the basin level or along a coastal zone.
[Reference to Aichi Targets 7 and 8], [Sustainable Development Goal 6, Indicator 6.3.1]
2.1 Has the quantity and quality of water available to, and required
A=Yes
by, wetlands been assessed to support the implementation of the
Guidelines for the allocation and management of water for A=Yes; B=No;
maintaining the ecological functions of wetlands (Resolution C=Partially;
VIII.1, VIII.2) ? 1.24. D=Planned
13
A=Yes;
1) Government policy on land and water conservation (Law 37/2014 on Land and Water
Conservation)
2) Draft Presidential Regulation on the Restoration of National Priority Lakes, coordinated by
Bappenas (direction and strategy of the restoration of region’s lakes)
3) Government Regulation No.38 of 2011 concerning Rivers
4) Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing No.28 of 2015 stipulating river
and lake boundaries
5) Presidential Regulation No. 59/2019 concerning control over the conversion of paddy fields
A=Yes
2.2 Have assessments of environmental flow been undertaken in
A=Yes; B=No;
relation to mitigation of impacts on the ecological character of
C=Partially;
wetlands (Action r3.4.iv)
D=Planned
1) Law 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management
2) Regulation of The Minister of Environment and Forestry Republic of Indonesia No: P.38 /
MENLHK / SETJEN / KUM. 1/7/2019 concerning Types of Business Plans and / or Activities
That Must Have Analysis of Environmental Impact
2.3 What, if any, initiatives have been taken to improve the A=Yes
sustainability of water use (or allocation of water resources) in A=Yes; B=No;
the context of ecosystem requirements across major river basins C=Partially;
(Resolutions VIII.1 and XII.12 )? (Action 3.4.6.) D=Planned; O= No
Change; X= Unknown
A=Yes
1) Law 32/2009 on The Protection and Management of Environment

2) Government Regulation No.37/2012 on River Catchment Management
A=Yes
2.4 Have projects that promote and demonstrate good practice in
A=Yes; B=No;
water allocation and management for maintaining the ecological
C=Partially;
functions of wetlands been developed (Action r3.4.ix. )
D=Planned
 Promotion of Paludiculture practices on peatlands, through the establishment of Indonesian

Paludiculture Forum (PaludiFor)
 Ministerial Decree PermenLHK No.8/2020 on the assignment of part of the government
responsibility on environment sector (peatlands restoration in 2020) to 7 Governors.
14
2.5 Percentage of households linked to sewage system ? 75 %
SDG 6 Target 6.3.1.
Percentage of households in urban and rural Area by province and final disposal of feces is 75%
in 2020
75%
E=# percent;
2.6 What is the percentage of sewerage coverage in the country? F= Less than # percent;
SDG 6 Target 6.3.1. G= More Than # percent;
X= Unknown;
Y= Not Relevant
Based on the Semester I 2020 Population Data, the total population of Indonesia as of 30 June
was 268,583,016 people.
E= 81.37 percent
E=# percent;
2.7 What is the percentage of users of septic tank/pit latrine if
F=Less Than # percent;
relevant to your country? SDG 6 Target 6.3.1.
G= More Than # percent;
X= Unknown;
Y= Not Relevant
Percentage of household in urban and rural area by province and final disposal of feces use septic
tank is 81.37%
A= Yes
2.8 Does the country use constructed wetlands/ponds as A= Yes, B= No; C=
wastewater treatment technology? Partially, D=Planned X=
SDG 6 Target 6.3.1. Unknown; Y= Not
Relevant
As n example, The Integrated Tourism Development Centre Lagoon (30 Ha), Bali, is an integrated
wastewater treatment system to accommodate and treat all waste from tourism and hotel
activities in the Nusa Dua tourism area, Bali. On this wastewater treatment process, recycled
water is produced and is classified as Irrigation Water, which is used for watering hotel gardens,
golf and all park areas in the Nusa Dua Tourism Area. In this lagoon area, the fish population has
developed and become a good habitat for no less than 77 bird species. The area is listed as
important place for birds and other animals observation.
E= 125
15
E= # plants;
2.9 Number of waste water treatment plants (or volume F= Less than #;
treated exist at national level)? G=More than #;
SDG 6 Target 6.3.1. X= Unknown;
Y= Not Relevant
In 2015-2019, the government through the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing
(KemenPUPR) has built at least 125 units of Wastewater Treatment Plants (IPAL), 163 units of
Sewage Treatment Plants (IPLT), and 176 units of Final Disposal Sites (TPA).
In the application, however, not all facilities that have been built are optimally used. This can be
seen from the percentage level of the use of these facilities.
C
A=Good; B=Not
2.10 How is the functional status of the wastewater treatment Functioning;
plants? If relevant to your country C=Functioning;
SDG 6 Target 6.3.1. Q=Obsolete; X=
Unknown; Y= Not
Relevant
The data shows that only 32.7% and 10.5% of the Wastewater Treatment Plants (IPAL) and Sewage
Treatment Plants (IPLT) are optimally used, the rest are damaged or are not optimally used. For
the Final Disposal Sites (TPA) itself, more than 90% of its use is still open dumping. This again
indicates that the construction of facilities alone cannot solve the problems of waste and
sanitation, but the role of the community and local government in their operation will greatly
contribute
C
A=Good; B=Not
2.11 The percentage of decentralized wastewater treatment Functioning
technology, including constructed wetlands/ponds is? C=Functioning;
SDG 6 Target 6.3.1. Q=Obsolete; X=
Unknown; Y= Not
Relevant
Partially functioning
unknown
2.12 Number of wastewater reuse systems (or volume re-used) and
purpose? SDG 6 Target 6.3.1.

Not relevant
16
R, S, T
R=Agriculture;
2.13 What is the purpose of the wastewater reuse system if S=Landscape;
relevant to your country ? SDG 6 Target 6.3.1. T=Industrial; U=Drinking;
X= Unknown; Y=Not
Relevant
2.13 Additional information: Please indicate if the wastewater reuse system is for free or taxed
or add any additional information.
A=Yes
2.14 Does your country use a wastewater treatment process that
utilizes wetlands as a natural filter while preserving the A=Yes; B=No;
wetland ecosystem? X= Unknown;
2.14 Additional information: If Yes, please provide an example
The ITDC Lagoon (30 Ha) is an integrated wastewater treatment system to accommodate and treat
all waste from tourism and hotel activities in the Nusa Dua tourism area, Bali. On this wastewater
treatment process, recycled water is produced and is classified as irrigation water, which is used
for watering hotel gardens, golf and all park areas in the Nusa Dua Tourism Area. In this lagoon
area, the fish population has developed and become a good habitat for no less than 77 bird
species. The area is listed as important place for birds and other animals observation.
Target 3. Public and private sectors have increased their efforts to apply guidelines and good practices
for the wise use of water and wetlands. {1.10}
[Reference to Aichi Targets 3, 4, 7 and 8]
3.1 Is the private sector encouraged to apply the Ramsar wise use C=Partially
principle and guidance (Ramsar handbooks for the wise use of
A=Yes; B=No;
wetlands) in its activities and investments concerning wetlands?
C=Partially;
{1.10.1} KRA 1.10.i
D=Planned
3.2 Has the private sector undertaken activities or actions for the A=Yes; B=No; C=
conservation, wise use and management of? {1.10.2} KRA 1.10.ii: Partially; D=Planned;
X= Unknown; Y= Not
Relevant
a) Ramsar Sites a) A=Yes
b) Wetlands in general b) A=Yes
17
1) Berbak – Sembilang National Park collaboration with Sinar Mas Group

2) Various private sectors (e.g. Danone) has collaborated on the celebration of World
Wetlands Day
3) Various private companies (e.g. Wings group Indonesia) provides donations to increase
access to the availability of water and sanitation facilities
4) Several companies, including state owned energy company (PT Pertamina), provided
support on the management of mangrove areas
5) CSR on wetlands e.g restoration ecosystem concession on wetlands, collaboration on
ecosystem rehabilitation in protected areas
6) Restoration Ecosystem concession (for private sector) on wetlands
7) Collaboration on ecosystem rehabilitation in protected areas
3.3 Have actions been taken to implement incentive measures which A=Yes
encourage the conservation and wise use of wetlands? {1.11.1} A=Yes; B=No; C=
KRA 1.11.i Partially; D=Planned
18
PROPER is an assessment of a company's environmental management performance that requires

measurable indicators. The Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Indonesia has
implemented this initiative aimed on the increasing of the engagement of companies in
environmental management as well as having a stimulant effect in complying with environmental
regulations and adding value to the maintenance of natural resources, energy conservation and
community development.
In 2020, the PROPER Gold (Beyond Compliance) award was awarded to 32 large companies
engaged in all fields
Yayasan Lahan Basah – Wetlands International Indonesia working in collaboration with various
Ministries and local government in the implementation of financial support mechanism for local
communities linked with restoration and other conservation measures, called Bio-Rights. We
provided a conditional loan, without collateral and interest, to local community groups aimed on
the development of community livelihood. In return, as part of the condition, local community
obliged to participate on the coastal restoration program, including development of village policy
to support the restoration program. Joint monitoring and evaluation program conducted
regularly to measure the level of success of community engagement. At the end of the program,
whenever the level of success reaches an agreed percentage, then the loan is converted into
grant. On the other hand, if failed to reach the agreed percentage, the community group has to
pay the loan proportionately. In almost all cases, community groups are able to achieve the
agreed percentage of result. This mechanism will allows communities to get sustainable
livelihood, and at the same time benefit from the restored ecosystem and ecosystem services.
Facilitating the development of village resources management agreement (Kesepakatan

Pelestarian Alam Desa) tools as principle reference to both livelihood practices and village
development plan in community-based mangrove conservation approach.
Community-based mangrove conservation approach are being implemented in KEE Kao, North
Maluku, through several activities such as conducted biodiversity assessment, participatory
mapping, building capacity in biodiversity, livelihood and habitat management, and facilitating
collaborative management with related local stakeholders
Regulation of Minister of Environment and Forestry No. P3/2016 regarding Kalpataru Award
Regulation of Minister of Environment and Forestry No. P48/2016 regarding Program kampung
iklim
A=Yes
3.4 Have actions been taken to remove perverse incentive measures
which discourage conservation and wise use of wetlands? {1.11.2} A=Yes; B=No;
KRA 1.11.i D=Planned; Z=Not
Applicable
19
Peatland moratorium – Presidential Instruction 5/2019 concerning the termination of new

permits in primary peatland and peat forest
Issuance of an instrument on licensing the disposal of liquid waste into the sea by Ministry of
Environment and Forestry
Target 4. Invasive alien species and pathways of introduction and expansion are identified and
prioritized, priority invasive alien species are controlled or eradicated, and management responses are
prepared and implemented to prevent their introduction and establishment.
{Reference to Aichi Target 9]
A=Yes
4.1 Does your country have a national inventory of invasive alien
species that currently or potentially impact the ecological A=Yes; B=No;
character of wetlands? {1.9.1} KRA 1.9.i C=Partially;
D=Planned
1) Indonesia has released a Ministerial Regulation (Minister of Environment and Forestry)

94/2016 on Invasive Species
2) Regulation of DG KSDAE No. P.4/KSDAE/Set/KSA.2/11/2019 concerning Procedures for
Risk Analysis of Invasive Plant Species on protected area
3) Law No. 21 of 2019 concerning Animal, Fish and Plant Quarantine
A=Yes
4.2 Have national policies or guidelines on invasive species control
and management been established or reviewed for wetlands? A=Yes; B=No;
{1.9.2} KRA 1.9.iii C=Partially;
D=Planned
National strategy and direction of action plan for the management of invasive foreign species in
Indonesia, 2015
20
4.3 Has your country successfully controlled through management A=Yes; B=No;
actions invasive species of high risk to wetland ecosystems? X= Unknown
4.3. Additional information: (If ‘Yes’, please provide examples, including the species name and
the successful management actions)
A=Yes;
Examples of species successfully controlled were Eichornia crassipes at Rawa Pening, Central
Java and Salvinia molesta at Ranu Pani, Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park
The Government issued a Regulation of The Minister of Forestry of The Republic of Indonesia No:
P.48 / Menhut-II / 2014 about Procedures for Implementing Ecosystem Restoration in Natural
Protected Areas. Ecosystem restoration is declared successful if the area has been covered by
more than 80% of forest plant vegetation and there are no invasive exotic species.
4.4 Are there invasive species of high risk to wetland ecosystems that
A=Yes; B=No;
have not been successfully controlled through management
X= Unknown
actions?
4.4 Additional information: (If ‘Yes’, please provide examples, including the species name and
the challenges to management)
A=Yes;
In Tanjung Puting National Park (Ramsar Site) there are invasive species such as Eceng gondok
(Eichhornia crassipes), acacia mangium, galam ( Melaleuca Leucadendron).
Handling related to IAS has not become a priority for area management because so far it is
considered not disturbing. Acacia mangium, which is located on the border between oil palm
plantations and national parks, is currently considered disturbing, because the acacia seeds are
carried by the wind and grow in the national park area. The current budget focuses on priority
activities such as handling forest and land fires
C=Partially
A=Yes; B=No;
4.5 Have the effectiveness of wetland invasive alien species control C=Partially;
programmes been assessed? D=Planned;
X=Unknown; Y=Not
Relevant
The Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MoEF) and Indonesian Institute of Sciences conducts
an IAS counter measures assessment program
The Ministry of Environment and Forestry has included the IAS management program in the 2020-
2024 KSDAE RPJMN (National Medium Term Development Plan) so that every year there will be
IAS handling activities in several selected conservation areas.
21
Goal 2. Effectively conserving and managing the Ramsar Site network
[Reference to Sustainable Development Goals 6, 11, 13, 14, 15]
Target 5. The ecological character of Ramsar Sites is maintained or restored through effective, planning
and integrated management {2.1.}
[Reference to Aichi Targets 6,11, 12]
A=Yes
5.1 Have a national strategy and priorities been established for the
further designation of Ramsar Sites, using the Strategic A=Yes; B=No;
Framework for the Ramsar List? {2.1.1} KRA 2.1.i C=Partially;
D=Planned
A national strategy for further designation of Ramsar Sites has been developed with a special
focus on providing technical guidance in determining the location as a new Ramsar site
5.2 Are the Ramsar Sites Information Service and its tools being A=Yes
used in national identification of further Ramsar Sites to A=Yes; B=No;
designate? {2.2.1} KRA 2.2.ii D=Planned
The use of RSIS and its tools have been consistently used by Indonesia, based on the Regulation
of the Director General of PHKA No. SK.151 / IV / Set-3/2007 concerning Guidelines for the
Identification and Inventory of Wetland Essential Ecosystems
E= 7
E= # sites; F=Less than
5.3 How many Ramsar Sites have a formal management plan?
# sites; G=More than
{2.4.1} KRA 2.4.i
# sites; X=Unknown;
Y=Not Relevant
E= 7
5.4 Of the Ramsar Sites with a formal management plan, for how E= # sites; F=Less than
many of these is the plan being implemented ? # sites; G=More than
{2.4.2} KRA 2.4.i # sites; X= Unknown;
Y=Not Relevant
5.5 Of the Ramsar sites without a formal management plan, for how Y=Not Relevant
many is there effective management planning currently being E= # sites; F=Less than
implemented through other relevant means e.g. through # sites; G=More than
existing actions for appropriate wetland management? {2.4.3} # sites; X= Unknown;
KRA 2.4.i Y=Not Relevant
5.3 – 5.5 Additional information:
All Ramsar Sites in Indonesia have developed and implemented formal management plans, in line
with the national policies on wetland protection
22
5.6 Have all Ramsar sites been assessed regarding the effectiveness A=Yes
of their management (i.e. sites with either a formal
management plan) or management via other relevant means A=Yes; B=No;
where they exist e.g through existing actions for appropriate C=Partially;
wetland management ? {1.6.2} KRA 1.6.ii D=Planned
The effectiveness of Ramsar Sites has been assessed regularly using the Management
Effectiveness Tracking Tool
Y=Not Relevant
E= # sites; F=Less than
5.7 How many Ramsar Sites have a cross-sectoral management
# sites; G=More than
committee? {2.4.4} {2.4.6} KRA 2.4.iv
# sites; X=Unknown,
Y=Not Relevant;
5.7 Additional information (If at least 1 site, please give the name and official number of the site
or sites):
All Ramsar Sites in Indonesia are currently under the management of the Directorate General of
Ecosystem and Natural Resources Conservation of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. A
cross sectoral committee is not available yet, but is possible if a Ramsar Site is outside the
conservation area
Target 7. Sites that are at risk of change of ecological character have threats addressed {2.6.}.
[Reference to Aichi Targets 5, 7, 11, 12]
7.1 Are mechanisms in place for the Administrative Authority to be A=Yes

informed of negative human-induced changes or likely changes in
A=Yes; B=No;
the ecological character of Ramsar Sites, pursuant to Article 3.2?
C=Some Sites;
{2.6.1} KRA 2.6.i
D=Planned
7.1 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Some sites’, please summarise the mechanism or
mechanisms established):
Indonesia has Government Regulation No.28 of 2011 junto Government Regulation No.108 / 2015
concerning Management of Nature Reserves and Nature Conservation which lays frameworks and
mechanisms for Administrative Authority to be informed of negative changes in the ecological
character of Ramsar Sites.
23
A=Yes
7.2 Have all cases of negative human-induced change or likely change A=Yes; B=No;
in the ecological character of Ramsar Sites been reported to the C=Some Cases;
Ramsar Secretariat, pursuant to Article 3.2? {2.6.2} KRA 2.6.i O=No Negative
Change
7.2 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Some cases’, please indicate for which Ramsar Sites the
Administrative Authority has made Article 3.2 reports to the Secretariat, and for which sites such
reports of change or likely change have not yet been made):
Indonesia has reported changes in the ecological charcter of Ramsar to a Ramsar Advisory
Mission who visited the Berbak National Park in 2017
7.3 If applicable, have actions been taken to address the issues for Z=Not Applicable
which Ramsar Sites have been listed on the Montreux Record, such A=Yes; B=No; Z=Not
as requesting a Ramsar Advisory Mission? {2.6.3} KRA 2.6.ii Applicable
7.3 Additional information (If ‘Yes’, please indicate the actions taken):
Goal 3. Wisely using all wetlands

[Reference to Sustainable Development Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]
Target 8. National wetland inventories have been either initiated, completed or updated and
disseminated and used for promoting the conservation and effective management of all wetlands
{1.1.1} KRA 1.1.i
C= In Progress
8.1 Does your country have a complete National Wetland Inventory? A=Yes; B=No; C=In
{1.1.1} KRA 1.1.i Progress;
D=Planned
 Inventories of sea grass and coral reef has been conducted in 2017 and is being updated.
 Indonesia has developed a One Map Policy, which is a policy aimed at standardizing and
unifying spatial data across the Indonesian archipelago, creating a base map and making spatial
data free and accessible. The Policy includes the development of maps based on the inventory
of mangrove, peatlands and lakes.
24
D=Planned
A=Yes; B=No; C=In
Progress; C1=
8.2 Has your country updated a National Wetland Inventory in the last
Partially;
decade?
D=Planned; X=
Unknown; Y=Not
Relevant
 Mangrove coverage was updated in 2019; Coral reef and Sea grass in 2017
 Several regulation concerning the inventory of wetlands are as follows:
o Government Regulation (PP) 71/2016 on national scale inventory
o Ministerial Regulation (KLHK) 29/2017 on the establishment of Peat Forest Areas (KHG)
o Ministerial Decree on Peat Ecosystem Function as a mandate of PP 71/2016, including
procedure on preparation and protection of peat ecosystem, and the DG Regulation on
restoration (Target 8)
o Minsiterial Decree on standard criteria on coral reef damage
o Ministerial Decree (KLHK) 47 on the Guidance for the measurement of coral reef
condition
o Director General Regulation (PPKL) on Guidance of coral reef and seag grass inventory
and monitoring. This guidance could be used on the identification and recovery of coral
reef and sea grass
A=Yes
8.3 Is wetland inventory data and information maintained? {1.1.2} KRA A=Yes; B=No;
1.1.ii C=Partially;
D=Planned
Wetland data which are continuously maintained and updated are on mangrove, coral reef and
sea grass
A=Yes
8.4 Is wetland inventory data and information made accessible to all A=Yes; B=No;
stakeholders? {1.1.2} KRA 1.1.ii C=Partially;
D=Planned
Especially mangrove, coral reef and sea grass
25
N=Status
Deteriorated;
8.5 Has the condition* of wetlands in your country, overall, changed
O=No Change;
during the last triennium? {1.1.3}
P=Status
a) Ramsar Sites
Improved
b) wetlands generally
a) N=Status
Please describe on the sources of the information on which your
Deteriorated
answer is based in the green free- text box below. If there is a
and P=Status
difference between inland and coastal wetland situations, please
Improved
describe. If you are able to, please describe the principal driver(s) of
the change(s).
b) N =Status
* ‘Condition’ corresponds to ecological character, as defined by the
Deteriorated
Convention
and P=Status
Improved
8.5 Additional information on a) and/or b):
Changes in wetlands condition reported by stakeholders
26
8.6 Based upon the National Wetland Inventory if available please X= Unknown
provide a figure in square kilometres for the extent of
wetlands (according to the Ramsar definition) for the year
2020 and provide the relevant disaggregated information in E= # Km 2 ;; G=More
the box below. This Information will also be used to report on than # Km 2; X=
SDG 6, Target 6.6, Indicator 6.6.1, for which the Ramsar Unknown
Convention is a co-custodian.
8.6
According to the Ramsar definition and classification of wetlands, the disaggregated information
on wetland extent is as follows:
Area by type of wetland Total area by

category of
wetland
Marine/Coastal Coral Reefs: Mangrove : Sea grass :
25178.58 km2 or 33112.07km² 1506.93 km2 59,797.59 km2
2,517,858 ha 3,311,207.45 ha 150,693.16 ha 5,979,758.61 ha
(2017) (2019) (2017)
Inland e.g Permanent e.g Non-forested e.g Permanent
freshwater peatlands (includes freshwater lakes:
marshes/swamps: shrub or open bogs, xx Km2
xx Km2 swamps, fens):
xx Km2
Human-made area of rice fields 74,639.48 km2
7,463,948 hectares
74639.48 km2
(2019)
Total 134,437.07 km2
Date of the inventory:
Reference or link:
The Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / National Land Agency (ATR / BPN) released the
raw area of rice fields in Indonesia in 2019 of 7.46 million hectares or to be precise 7,463,948 hectares.
Note:
The minimum information that should be provided is the total area of wetlands for each of the
three major categories; “marine/coastal”, “inland” and “human-made”.
If the data on inventories are partial or not complete, use the information that is available.
Guidance on information on national wetland extent, to be provided in Target 8 “National

Wetlands Inventory” of the National Report Form can be consulted at:
https://www.ramsar.org/document/guidance-on-information-on-national-wetland-extent
27
Additional information: If the information is available please indicate the % of change in the
extent of wetlands over the last three years. Please note: For the % of change in the extent of
wetlands, if the period of data covers more than three years, provide the available information,
and indicate the period of the change.
8.7 Please indicate your needs (in terms of technical, financial or governance challenges) to
develop, update or complete a National Wetland Inventory
- Capacity building
- Knowledge exchange
- Centralized data base system (e.g. one map policy on data base)
Target 9. The wise use of wetlands is strengthened through integrated resource management at the
appropriate scale, inter alia, within a river basin or along a coastal zone {1.3.}.
[Reference to Aichi Targets 4, 6, 7].
9.1 Is a Wetland Policy (or equivalent instrument) that promotes the A=Yes
wise use of wetlands in place? {1.3.1} KRA 1.3.i
A=Yes; B=No; C=In
(If ‘Yes’, please give the title and date of the policy in the green
Preparation;
text box)
D=Planned
Indonesia already has various regulations related to the wise use of wetlands at both the national
and sub-national levels
A=Yes
9.2 Have any amendments to existing legislation been made to reflect
A=Yes; B=No; C=In
Ramsar commitments? {1.3.5}{1.3.6}
Progress; D=Planned
Changes to regulations due to state needs, including those related to Ramsar commitments, for
example regulations related to water resource conservation that were revoked by the
Constitutional Court
9.3 Are wetlands treated as natural water infrastructure integral to A=Yes

water resource management at the scale of river basins? {1.7.1} A=Yes; B=No;
{1.7.2} KRA 1.7.ii D=Planned
28
1) Government Regulation No.37/2012 regarding river basin management.
2) Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation No.105/ MenLHK/Setjen/Kum/I/2018
regarding procedures for implementing incentives for forest and land rehabilitation
(including rehabilitation at riverbanks)
9.4 Have Communication, Education, Participation and Awareness A=Yes

(CEPA) expertise and tools been incorporated into catchment/river
basin planning and management (see Resolution X.19)? A=Yes; B=No;
{1.7.2}{1.7.3} D=Planned
A=Yes
9.5 Has your country established policies or guidelines for enhancing
the role of wetlands in mitigating or adapting to climate change? A=Yes; B=No;
{1.7.3} {1.7.5} KRA 1.7.iii C=Partially;
D=Planned
Through Regulation of Director General of Climate Change No. P.4/PPI/SET/Kum.I/II/2009 on the

Identification of Ecosystem-based Climate Change Adpatation
A=Yes
9.6 Has your country formulated plans or projects to sustain and
enhance the role of wetlands in supporting and maintaining viable A=Yes; B=No;
farming systems? {1.7.4} {1.7.6} KRA 1.7.v C=Partially;
D=Planned
Through Regulation of The President of The Republic of Indonesia No. 59 Year 2019 regarding
Changes of Rice Field Function Control
9.7 Has research to inform wetland policies and plans been A=Yes; B=No;
undertaken in your country on: D=Planned
a) agriculture-wetland interactions
b) climate change a) A=Yes
c) valuation of ecoystem services b) A=Yes
{1.6.1} KRA 1.6.i c) A=Yes
Various studies have been done on the valuation of ecosystem services from mangroves, peat,
karst, coral reef, sea grass
29
A=Yes
9.8 Has your country submitted a request for Wetland City A=Yes; B=No;
Accreditation of the Ramsar Convention, Resolution XII.10 ? C=Partially;
D=Planned
9.8 Additional information: (If ‘Yes’, please indicate How many request have been submitted):
A=Yes
Indonesia has been submitted applications of two cities for Wetland City Accreditation : (a)
Surabaya City and (b) Tanjung Jabung Timur District
D=Planned
9.9 Has your country made efforts to conserve small wetlands in line A=Yes; B=No;
with Resolution XIII. 21? C=Partially;
D=Planned
9.9 Additional information: (If ‘Yes’, please indicate what actions have been implemented):
The government is currently formulating a regulation regarding ecosystem essential management,

which includes the small wetlands
Target 10. The traditional knowledge innovations and practices of indigenous peoples and local
communities relevant for the wise use of wetlands and their customary use of wetland resources, are
documented, respected, subject to national legislation and relevant international obligations and fully
integrated and reflected in the implementation of the Convention with a full and effective participation
of indigenous and local communities at all relevant levels.
A=Yes
10.1 Have case studies, participation in projects or successful
A=Yes; B=No; C=In
experiences on cultural aspects of wetlands been compiled.
Preparation;
Resolution VIII.19 and Resolution IX.21? (Action 6.1.6)
D=Planned
10.1 Additional information: (If yes please indicate the case studies or projects documenting
information and experiences concerning culture and wetlands).
Various projects on wetland management have taken into account cultural aspects. For example,
in wetlands management in Haruku Island, Buani Island, Bali, Lombok, Buton and Banten, local
wisdoms such as “sasi,” “awig-awig” and “lubukban” are highly regarded. Local communities
participate in wetland conservation through traditional and ritual activities.
30
10.2 Have the guidelines for establishing and strengthening local a) A=Yes
communities’ and indigenous people’s participation in the
management of wetlands been used or applied such as b) A=Yes
a) stakeholders, including local communities and indigenous people

are represented on National Ramsar Committees or similar bodies
b) involvement and assistance of indigenous people’s and A=Yes; B=No; C=In
community-based groups, wetland education centres and non- Preparation;
governmental organizations with the necessary expertise to D=Planned
facilitate the establishment of participatory approaches;
(Resolution VII. 8) (Action 6.1.5)

10.2 Additional information: (If the answer is “yes” please indicate the use or aplication of the
guidelines)
The govrnment has issued a Management Plan for National Priority Lakes. The document stated
that local knowledge has been adopted, including how to engage communities in lake
management, as well as appointing local government as coordinator and implementer in the field
A=Yes
10.3 Traditional knowledge and management practices relevant for the
wise use of wetlands have been documented and their A=Yes; B=No; C=In
application encouraged (Action 6.1.2 ) Preparation;
D=Planned
Traditional knowledge and management practices relevant for the wise use of wetlands have
been documented in Maluku and Jambi provinces by an NGO “Burung Indonesia.” Similar
activities are carried out by Yayasan Lahan Basah (Wetlands International Indonesia) in Banten
and Central Java Provinces.
Target 11. Wetland functions, services and benefits are widely demonstrated, documented and
disseminated. {1.4.}
A=Yes
A=Yes; B=No; C=In
11.1 Have ecosystem benefits/services provided by wetlands been Preparation;
researched in your country, recorded in documents like State of the C1=Partially;
Environment reporting, and the results promoted? {1.4.1} KRA 1.4.ii D=Planned; X=
Unknown; Y=Not
Relevant
11.1 Additional information: (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Partially’, please indicate, how many wetlands and their
names):
Strategic Environmental Assessment as a key document in the preparation of the country’s

Regional Medium Term Development Plan (RPJMD)
31
A=Yes
11.2 Have wetland programmes or projects that contribute to poverty A=Yes; B=No;
alleviation objectives or food and water security plans been C=Partially;
implemented? {1.4.2} KRA 1.4.i D=Planned; X=
Unknown; Y=Not
Relevant
Various Community base projects include issues on poverty alleviation
A=Yes
11.3 Have socio-economic values of wetlands been included in the
management planning for Ramsar Sites and other wetlands? A=Yes; B=No;
{1.4.3}{1.4.4} KRA 1.4.iii C=Partially;
D=Planned
11.3 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Partially’, please indicate, if known, how many Ramsar
Sites and their names):
Projects implemented by YLBA (Wetlands International Indonesia), Burung Indonesia and the
Management of Ramsar sites have included socio economic values issue in their activities
11.4 Have cultural values of wetlands been included in the A=Yes

management planning for Ramsar Sites and other wetlands
including traditional knowledge for the effective management of
sites (Resolution VIII.19)? {1.4.3}{1.4.4} KRA 1.4.iii A=Yes; B=No;
C=Partially;
D=Planned
11.4 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Partially’, please indicate, if known, how many Ramsar
Sites and their names):
Cultural values have been implemented in Maluku and Jambi provinces by an NGO “Burung
Indonesia.” Similar activities are carried out by Yayasan Lahan Basah (Wetlands International
Indonesia) in Banten and Central Java Provinces.
Target 12. Restoration is in progress in degraded wetlands, with priority to wetlands that are relevant
for biodiversity conservation, disaster risk reduction, livelihoods and/or climate change mitigation and
adaptation. {1.8.}
[Reference to Aichi Targets 14 and 15].
A=Yes
12.1 Have priority sites for wetland restoration been identified? {1.8.1} A=Yes; B=No; C=
KRA 1.8.i Partially; D=Planned;
X=Unknown; Y=Not
Relevant
32
1) Accelerating peat ecosystem recovery and restoration activities, namely peat

hydrological restoration (support target 1)
2) Presidential Instruction 5/2019 regarding the termination of new permits and primary
peatland forest (support target 1)
3) In some areas such as Riau, socialization has also been carried out and applied practical
techniques for sustainable of tropical peatlands. This including the development of
sustainable cultivation of native peat plants without drainage, better known as
paludiculture (support target 3).
4) Implementation of the restoration plan in 7 provinces based on indicative peat
restoration maps. Degraded peat area maps are overlaid with burned areas, peatland
forest areas and peatland ecosystem maps, canal network data and ex-burnt areas.
5) Restoration interventions are carried out in non-concession areas, because state funds
(APBN ) are not allocated for concession areas. Restoration by the Peatland Restoration
Agency are only done in other usage areas (support target 7)
A=Yes
12.2 Have wetland restoration/rehabilitation programmes, plans or A=Yes; B=No; C=
projects been effectively implemented? {1.8.2} KRA 1.8.i Partially; D=Planned;
X=Unknown; Y=Not
Relevant
12.2 Additional information: (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Partially’, please indicate, if available the extent of
wetlands restored ):
Rehabilitation and restoration in wetland areas are carried out inside and outside conservation
areas, among others through:
 Restoration of peatlands in 7 provinces based on indicative peat restoration maps. Degraded
peat area maps are overlaid with burnt areas, peat and peatland ecosystem maps, canal
network data and burn marks,
 Acceleration of peat ecosystem restoration and restoration activities, namely peat
hydrological restoration,
 Implementation of Presidential instruction No.5 regarding the termination of new permits
and primary peatland forest
 Education and awareness-raising activities in applying practical techniques for sustainable
management of tropical peatlands have been carried out, for example the development of
sustainable cultivation of native peat plants without drainage which is better known as
paludiculture
 Rehabilitation of coastal areas by Yayasan Lahan Basah (Wetlands International Indonesia) in
Banten Province.
A=Yes; B=No; C=
12.3 Have the Guidelines for Global Action on Peatlands and on
Partially; D=Planned;
Peatlands, climate change and wise use (Resolutions VIII.1 and
X=Unknown; Y=Not
XII.11) been implemented including?
Relevant
a) Knowledge of global resources
A=Yes
b) Education and public awareness on peatlands
A=Yes
33
c) Policy and legislative instruments
A=Yes
d) Wise use of peatlands
A=Yes
e) Research networks, regional centres of expertise, and institutional
capacity A=Yes
34
f) International cooperation
A=Yes
g) Implementation and support
A=Yes
35
12.3 Additional information: (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Partially’, please indicate, the progress in
implementation:
The Ministry of Environment and Forestry in 2012 issued Guidelines for the implementation of a
national greenhouse gas inventory
a) Knowledge of global resources

 The government carried out LiDAR mapping scale 1:2.5000 in 8 Peat Hydrological Units
(PMU) spread across 5 provinces (Riau, Jambi, South Sumatra, West Kalimantan and
Central Kalimantan Provinces) to obtain more detailed data and information on peatland
physical conditions, land cover, topographical conditions, and hydro topography which
can then be used in implementing peat restoration plans.
 Peatland mapping scale 1:50.000 based on national standard for peatland mapping
in Indonesia in 106 Peat Hydrological Units (PMU) spread across 7 provinces (Riau, Jambi,
South Sumatra, West Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan, South Kalimantan, and Papua
Provinces) to develop peat restoration plans.
 The Peatland Restoration Agency (BRG) develops the Peatland Restoration Information
Monitoring System (PRIMS) in collaboration with Agency for the Assessment and
Application of Technology (BPPT), Meteorological, Climatological, and Geophysical
Agency (BMKG), The Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), FAO, UNDP, UNOPS, World
Resources Institute (WRI) Indonesia, and Kemitraan Partnership. PRIMS is a spatial-data-
based online platform that provides up-to-date information on the condition of peatland
and progress of peatland restoration activities (planning and implementation, indicators
of peat degradation, and impact of restoration activities on the BRG peat restoration
target area) conducted by BRG and partners. Through https://prims.brg.go.id,
stakeholders (national and sub-national governments, community, academics,
researchers, partner, etc.) can monitor the progress of peat restoration in 7 provinces in
Indonesia.
 The development of the Peatland Water Monitoring System (SIPALAGA,
https://sipalaga.brg.go.id ) to monitor peat moisture in real time (collaboration with BPPT
and the University of Hokkaido), as well as monitoring of humidity through remote
sensing technology with the System for Earth Observation Data Access, Processing &
Analysis for Monitoring platform (SEPAL) in collaboration with FAO. Data sources of
SIPALAG comes from 154 ground water level stations spreads out in 7 provinces.
b) Education and public awareness on peatlands

• Up to 2020, provided assistance on 640 villages (1.428.445 hectares) through Peat Care
Village Program (as part of revitalization of community livelihood approaches) including
socialization on peat-friendly management spread out in 7 provinces of peat restoration
target areas.
• Conducted Peat Farmers Field School (SLPG) involving 1,455 cadres to promotes land
management without burning (PLTB) activities across 7 provinces.
• Collaborated with religious leaders and religious organizations (Indonesian Ulema
Council, Agricultural Development Institute of Nahdlatul Ulama, the the Central Executive
Board of Muhammadiyah, and the Indonesian Churches Alliance (PGI) to promotes
environmental (especially peatland) conservation. This program involves 548 Islamic
religious cadres and 130 priests in 7 provinces.
d) Wise use of peatlands

• Peat restoration is carried out through three approaches, namely:
36
- rewetting to increase peat moisture (implemented by building canal blocking, canal
backfilling, and deep wells) in outside the concession area with rewetting affected area
around 835,288 hectares
- Revegetation to increase land cover and provide organic material forming tropical peat.
It covers total area of 1,709.35 hectares.
- Provides 1,214 packages for revitalization of community livelihood based on land-based,
water resources and fisheries, and environmental services activities.
This three-approach involve 2,295 community groups in 714 villages (with a total of
29,644 community members, with the assumption of 4 people per family, there are
around 118,576 people indirectly receive benefit from this restoration program).
• In collaboration with university experts and ministerial R&D agencies, BRG supervises the
construction of 538,430 ha of peat wetting in concession area in 5 provinces (involving
347 participants, direct visits to 46 companies, follow-up visits to 13 companies, and
technical guidance to 134 companies).
• Promotes paludiculture, including building pilot project in Riau and Jambi Provinces.
e) Research networks, regional centers of expertise, and institutional capacity

 BRG conducted research and development in collaboration with sub-national,
national, and international researchers to support implementation of three
approaches of peatland restoration (rewetting, revegetation, and revitalization of
community livelihood). Finding of the researches can be find in https://kms-
troper.brg.go.id/ (in Bahasa).
 BRG collaborates with some foreign institutions set capacity building programs to
enhance skills and knowledge of BRG’s employee and Sub-National Peatland
Restoration Team in peatland restoration.
 BRG also provided field assistance for international students (University of
Queensland) who conducted community engagement and transdisciplinary learning
in peatland.
f) International cooperation
 BRG received financial support from Norwegian Government to implement
restoration activities, such as for some target of mapping, planning, community
engagement, and back-office support activities. This support carried out by UNDP,
UNOPS, FAO, World Bank, WRI lndonesia, and Kemitraan Partnership (a local
institution).
 BRG also cooperate with JICA, GIZ, UKCCU, USAID, GGGl, Wetland International
Indonesia, WWF Indonesia, etc to implement peatland restoration.
 Peatland restoration activity contribute to support international commitment, such
as:
a. Sustainable Development Goal, especially:
- Institutions Support food security through community livelihood revitalization
programs (in accordance with SDGs Goal 2 - No Hunger, especially promoting
sustainable agriculture).
- Minimizing forest and peatland fires that causes negative impact on public
health (in accordance with SDGs Goal 3 - Healthy and Prosperous Life).
- Strengthening villages through Peat Care Villages (DPG), including in villages
on the outer islands (in accordance with SDGs Goal 16 - Promoting peaceful
and inclusive societies for sustainable development, providing access to
37
justice for all and building effective, accountable, institutions and inclusive at
all levels).
b. UNFCCC: reducing GHG emissions and achieve NDCs (also in accordance with
SDGs Goal 13 - Addressing Climate Change).
c. Convention on Biological Diversity / CBD: Supporting habitat improvement for
biodiversity conservation at sites designated under the Ramsar Convention
(wetlands), namely on the east coast of Sumatra (TN Berbak, TN Sembilang),
TN Tanjung Puting, and TN Wasur. This is in line with SDGs Goal 15 - Inland
Ecosystems, in particular supporting sustainable forest management, stopping
and rehabilitating land degradation, and supporting stopping the extinction of
biodiversity.
Target 13. Enhanced sustainability of key sectors such as water, energy, mining, agriculture, tourism,
urban development, infrastructure, industry, forestry, aquaculture and fisheries when they affect
wetlands, contributing to biodiversity conservation and human livelihoods.
A=Yes
13.1 Are Strategic Environmental Assessment practices applied when
reviewing policies, programmes and plans that may impact upon A=Yes; B=No;
wetlands? {1.3.3} {1.3.4} KRA 1.3.ii C=Partially;
D=Planned
Indonesia has Regulation of The Minister of Environment and Forestry Republic of Indonesia No.
P.38 / MENLHK / SETJEN / KUM. 1/7/2019 concerning Types of Business Plans and / or Activities
That Must Have Analysis of Environmental Impact
13.2 Are Environmental Impact Assessments made for any

development projects (such as new buildings, new roads, A=Yes
extractive industry) from key sectors such as water, energy,
mining, agriculture, tourism, urban development, infrastructure, A=Yes; B=No;
industry, forestry, aquaculture and fisheries that may affect C=Some Cases
wetlands? {1.3.4} {1.3.5} KRA 1.3.iii
Yes, Environmental impact assessments are made for any development project with reference to
Regulation of The Minister of Environment and Forestry Republic of Indonesia No: P.38 / MENLHK
/ SETJEN / KUM. 1/7/2019 concerning Types of Business Plans and / or Activities That Must Have
Analysis of Environmental Impact
Goal 4. Enhancing implementation

38
Target 15. Ramsar Regional Initiatives with the active involvement and support of the Parties in each
region are reinforced and developed into effective tools to assist in the full implementation of the
Convention. {3.2.}
15.1 Have you (AA) been involved in the development and A=Yes
implementation of a Regional Initiative under the framework of the
A=Yes; B=No;
Convention? {3.2.1} KRA 3.2.i
D=Planned
15.1 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Planned’, please indicate the regional initiative(s) and the
collaborating countries of each initiative):
Activities organized by RRCEA, EAAFP, ACB, International Tropical Peatlands Center,

International Coral Reef Initiative, Coral Triangle Initiative
15.2 Has your country supported or participated in the development of A=Yes

other regional (i.e., covering more than one country) wetland A=Yes; B=No;
training and research centres? {3.2.2} D=Planned
15.2 Additional information (If ‘Yes’, please indicate the name(s) of the centre(s):
International Tropical Peatlands Center, International Coral Reef Initiative, Coral Triangle
Initiative
Target 16. Wetlands conservation and wise use are mainstreamed through communication, capacity
development, education, participation and awareness {4.1}.
16.1 Has an action plan (or plans) for wetland CEPA been established? A=Yes; B=No; C=In
{4.1.1} KRA 4.1.i Progress;
D=Planned
a) At the national level
b) Sub-national level a) A=Yes
c) Catchment/basin level b) A=Yes
d) Local/site level c) A=Yes
(Even if no CEPA plans have been developed, if broad CEPA d) A=Yes
objectives for CEPA actions have been established, please indicate
this in the Additional information section below)
16.1 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ or ‘In progress’ to one or more of the four questions above,
for each please describe the mechanism, who is responsible and identify if it has involved CEPA
NFPs):
The action plan that is made is not just a Ramsar framework
39
E= # centres; F=Less
than #; G=More
16.2 How many centres (visitor centres, interpretation centres,
than #;
education centres) have been established? {4.1.2} KRA 4.1.ii
X=Unknown; y=Not
a) at Ramsar Sites
Relevant;
b) at other wetlands
a) E = 7 centres
b) G=More than 10
16.2 Additional information (If centres are part of national or international networks, please
describe the networks):
Several Mangrove Information Centers have been developed and worked properly, including:
 Kariangan Mangrove Forest Center is located in Graha Indah, Batu Ampar Village, West
Balikpapan Sub-District, Balikpapan City, East Kalimantan Province. The Kariangan Mangrove
Center forest area covers an area of 150 hectares, covering the northern part of Balikpapan
Bay which extends from west to east. Further north, the swampy area disappeared and there
was hard ground,
 Mangrove Information Center (MIC) or Mangrove Forest Conservation Tourism Area in Bali is
located in the Suwung Kauh area, Denpasar, Bali. This forest area reaches 1373.5 hectares and
is equipped with a 2 km long wooden bridge to walk in it,
 Villages communities in Demak District developed village-based mangrove center for education
and tourism purposes,
 There are several mangrove centers built in several locations both in conservation areas and
outside conservation areas, in the future Indonesia intends to make mangrove centers on a
larger scale.
16.3 Does the Contracting Party: A=Yes; B=No;

a) promote stakeholder participation in decision-making on wetland C=Partially;
planning and management D=Planned
b) specifically involve local stakeholders in the selection of new a) A=Yes
Ramsar Sites and in Ramsar Site management? b) A=Yes
{4.1.3} KRA 4.1.iii
16.3 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Partially’, please provide information about the ways in
which stakeholders are involved):
Each Ramsar Sites has a wetland management planning program that involves the community and
local government
40
B=No
A=Yes; B=No; C=
16.4 Do you have an operational cross-sectoral National Partially;
Ramsar/Wetlands Committee? {4.1.6} KRA 4.3.v D=Planned;
X=Unknown; Y=Not
Relevant
16.4 Additional information (If ‘Yes’, indicate a) its membership; b) number of meetings since
COP13; and c) what responsibilities the Committee has):
A=Yes
A=Yes; B=No; C=
16.5 Do you have an operational cross-sectoral body equivalent to a Partially;
National Ramsar/Wetlands Committee? {4.1.6} KRA 4.3.v D=Planned;
X=Unknown; Y=Not
Relevant
16.5 Additional information (If ‘Yes’, indicate a) its membership; b) number of meetings since
COP13; and c) what responsibilities the Committee has):
In 2020, Indonesia established a Strategic Coordination Team Wetland Management for The
Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals and Development of Low Carbon, in accordance
with Decree of the Minister of National Development Planning No. KEP.89/M.PPN/HK/10/2020
16.6 Are other communication mechanisms (apart from a national A=Yes; B=No;
committee) in place to share Ramsar implementation guidelines C=Partially;
and other information between the Administrative Authority and: D=Planned
a) Ramsar Site managers
b) other MEA national focal points a) A=Yes
c) other ministries, departments and agencies b) A=Yes
{4.1.7} KRA 4.1.vi c) A=Yes
16.6 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Partially’, please describe what mechanisms are in place):
Coordination meeting, national report preparation, pre-cop meeting)
Aadministrative Authority organizes the Annual Technical Supervision Meeting to coordinate

national implementation of Ramsar Convention among the central government, Technical
Implementation Unit at Ramsar Sites and local areas, and other ministries/agencies.
16.7 Have Ramsar-branded World Wetlands Day activities (whether on 2 A=Yes

February or at another time of year), either government and NGO-
led or both, been carried out in the country since COP13? {4.1.8} A=Yes; B=No
The World Wetlands Day has been celebrated each year in Indonesia.
41
16.8 Have campaigns, programmes, and projects (other than for World
Wetlands Day-related activities) been carried out since COP13 to A=Yes
raise awareness of the importance of wetlands to people and
wildlife and the ecosystem benefits/services provided by wetlands? A=Yes; B=No;
{4.1.9} D=Planned
16.8 Additional information (If these and other CEPA activities have been undertaken by other
organizations, please indicate this):
 Celebration of World Water Day,
 National Nature Conservation Day,
 International Mangrove Day,
 National Day of Trees and Animal
 Love for Puspa and Animals,
 National Planting Day
 World Migratory Bird Day
Target 17. Financial and other resources for effectively implementing the fourth Ramsar Strategic Plan
2016 – 2024 from all sources are made available. {4.2.}
17.1 A=Yes
a) Have Ramsar contributions been paid in full for 2018, 2019 and 2020? A=Yes; B=No; Z=Not
{4.2.1} KRA 4.2.i Applicable
b) If ‘No’ in 17.1 a), please clarify what plan is in place to ensure future prompt payment:
2018 and 2019 have been paid. Payment for 2020 is delayed due to the budget cut following
fiscal austerities because of the Covid-19 pandemic.
17.2 Has any additional financial support been provided through A=Yes
voluntary contributions to non-core funded Convention activities?
{4.2.2} KRA 4.2.i A=Yes; B=No
17.2 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ please state the amounts, and for which activities):
In addition to the regular budget allocated by the government for Convention-related activities,
the government also provides small grants dedicated to support research, public education and
small project in Ramsar Sites and various wetland sites. The amount of these small grants varies
from one year to another, depends on the government’s budget availability.
17.3 [For Contracting Parties with a development assistance agency

Z=Not Applicable
only (‘donor countries’)]: Has the agency provided funding to
support wetland conservation and management in other A=Yes; B=No; Z=Not
countries? {3.3.1} KRA 3.3.i Applicable
17.3 Additional information (If ‘Yes’, please indicate the countries supported since COP12):
42
Z=Not Applicable
17.4 [For Contracting Parties with a development assistance agency A=Yes; B=No; C=
only (‘donor countries’)]: Have environmental safeguards and Partially; X=
assessments been included in development proposals proposed Unknown; Y=Not
by the agency? {3.3.2} KRA 3.3.ii Relevant; Z=Not
Applicable
17.5 [For Contracting Parties that have received development A=Yes

assistance only (‘recipient countries’)]: Has funding support been
received from development assistance agencies specifically for in- A=Yes; B=No; Z=Not
country wetland conservation and management? {3.3.3} Applicable
17.5 Additional information (If ‘Yes’, please indicate from which countries/agencies since
COP12):
e.g UNDP Tiger, KFW Forest VI
B=No
17.6 Has any financial support been provided by your country to the
A=Yes; B=No; Z=Not
implementation of the Strategic Plan?
Applicable
17.6 Additional information (If “Yes” please state the amounts, and for which activities):
Target 18. International cooperation is strengthened at all levels {3.1}
A=Yes
18.1 Are the national focal points of other MEAs invited to participate
in the National Ramsar/Wetland Committee? {3.1.1} {3.1.2} KRAs A=Yes; B=No;
3.1.i & 3.1.iv C=Partially;
D=Planned
The National Wetlands committee consists of representatives from various Ministries / Agencies
43
18.2 Are mechanisms in place at the national level for collaboration A=Yes
between the Ramsar Administrative Authority and the focal points A=Yes; B=No;
of UN and other global and regional bodies and agencies (e.g. C=Partially;
UNEP, UNDP, WHO, FAO, UNECE, ITTO)? {3.1.2} {3.1.3} KRA 3.1.iv D=Planned
The mechanism takes the form of meetings at the national wetlands committee and other
related working groups
18.3 Has your country received assistance from one or more UN and A=Yes
other global and regional bodies and agencies (e.g. UNEP, UNDP,
WHO, FAO, UNECE, ITTO) or the Convention’s IOPs in its A=Yes; B=No;
implementation of the Convention? {4.4.1} KRA 4.4.ii. C=Partially;
The IOPs are: BirdLife International, the International Water D=Planned; X=
Management Institute (IWMI), IUCN (International Union for Unknown; Y=Not
Conservation of Nature), Wetlands International, WWF and Relevant
Wildfowl & Wetland Trust (WWT).
18.3 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ please name the agency (es) or IOP (s) and the type of
assistance received):
e.g UNDP Tiger
A=Yes
18.4 Have networks, including twinning arrangements, been
established, nationally or internationally, for knowledge sharing A=Yes; B=No;
and training for wetlands that share common features? {3.4.1} C=Partially;
D=Planned
18.4 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Partially’, please indicate the networks and wetlands
involved):
1) Delegations from the Philippines, Kenya and Timor Leste, visited the location of Building
with Nature Project in Demak.
2) visit of representatives of the Environment Agencies Abu Dhabi (EAD) and the UAE
Ministry of Climate Change and Environment to the Karangsong Mangrove Forest in
Indramayu
3) Denmark delegation visits the Hutan Harapan
A=Yes
18.5 Has information about your country’s wetlands and/or Ramsar
Sites and their status been made public (e.g., through publications A=Yes; B=No;
or a website)? {3.4.2} KRA 3.4.iv C=Partially;
D=Planned
44
A=Yes
18.6 Have all transboundary wetland systems been identified? {3.5.1} A=Yes; B=No;
KRA 3.5.i D=Planned; Z=Not
Applicable
Heart of Borneo, Wasur Tonda
A=Yes
18.7 Is effective cooperative management in place for shared wetland A=Yes; B=No;
systems (for example, in shared river basins and coastal zones)? C=Partially;
{3.5.2} KRA 3.5.ii D=Planned; Y=Not
Relevant
18.7 Additional information (If ‘Yes’ or ‘Partially’, please indicate for which wetland systems such
management is in place):
merging the management of two national parks, namely Berbak and Sembilang national park
A=Yes
18.8 Does your country participate in regional networks or initiatives for A=Yes; B=No;
wetland-dependent migratory species? {3.5.3} KRA 3.5.iii D=Planned; Z=Not
Applicable
Indonesia has been actively engaged on the East Asian Austrlasian Flyway Partnership. The
Partnership itself establihed in Bogor, Indonesia, 2006. A National Partnership on Migratory Birds
and Their Habitat established under the Decree of DG KSDAE, and need to be renewed in 2021
Target 19. Capacity building for implementation of the Convention and the 4th Ramsar Strategic Plan
2016 – 2024 is enhanced.
[Reference to Aichi Targets 1 and 17]
A=Yes
19.1 Has an assessment of national and local training needs for the
implementation of the Convention been made? {4.1.4} KRAs 4.1.iv A=Yes; B=No;
& 4.1.viii C=Partially;
D=Planned
Conduct technical guidance regarding the Proposal of a new Ramsar Site
45
A=Yes
19.2 Are wetland conservation and wise-use issues included in formal
education programmes?. A=Yes; B=No;
C=Partially;
D=Planned
19.2 Additional information: If you answer yes to the above please provide information on which
mechanisms and materials:
The wetlands management has been included on local education curricula in Indramayu, West
Java Province and East Kalimantan Province
a) E = 3 times
opportunities
19.3 How many opportunities for wetland site manager training have b) X = Unknown
been provided since COP13? {4.1.5} KRA 4.1.iv E=# opportunities;
a) at Ramsar Sites F=Less than #; G=
b) at other wetlands (Bimtek/Technical supervision Bali) More than #; X=
Unknown; Y=Not
Relevant
19.3 Additional information (including whether the Ramsar Wise Use Handbooks were used in
the training):
 The 10th Regional Training Workshop for Wetland Managers in East, Southeast and South Asia
Asia in Suncheon Bay International Wetland Center, Suncheon City, Republic of Korea, 7 – 11
May 2018 attended by Deputy Director of Wetlands Conservation dan Biodiversity Park (Mr.
Margo Utomo) and Staff (Mr. Rangga Agung Prabowo).
 The 11th Regional Training Workshop for Wetland Managers in East, Southeast and South Asia,
18 – 22 March 2019, Suncheon City, Republic of Korea, represented by Head of Jakarta Natural
Resources Conservation Office.
 Conduct technical guidance on how to prepare new Ramsar site document proposals
in Bali 2020
A=Yes
19.4 Have you (AA) used your previous Ramsar National Reports in A=Yes; B=No;
monitoring implementation of the Convention? {4.3.1} KRA 4.3.ii D=Planned; Z=Not
Applicable
19.4 Additional information (If ‘Yes’, please indicate how the Reports have been used for
monitoring):
Previous reports are used as a reference in the preparation of the next national reports
46
Section 4. Optional annex to allow any Contracting Party that has developed
national targets to provide information on those
Goal 1. Addressing the drivers of wetland loss and degradation

[Reference to Sustainable Development Goals 1, 2, 6, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15]
Target 1. Wetland benefits are featured in national/ local policy strategies and plans relating to key
sectors such as water, energy, mining, agriculture, tourism, urban development, infrastructure, industry,
forestry, aquaculture, fisheries at the national and local level.

Priority of the target: A= High A= High; B= Medium; C= Low; D= Not relevant; E= No
answer
Resourcing: C= Limiting A= Good; B= Adequate; C= Limiting; D= Severely
National Targets (Text A number of Indonesia government policies related to wetlands were
Answer): issued between 2013 and 2016, among others:
1) Government Regulations for the Protection and Management of
Peatland Ecosystems (PP No71/2014) and then revised under PP
57/2016.
2) Government Regulation on Swamp (PP No 73/2013)
3) President Instruction on Moratorium on Granting of New Licenses
and Improvement of Natural Primary Forest and Peatland
Governance (INPRES No 8/2015),
4) Ministrial Decree of Agriculture/MoA No14/2009 on Guidelines
on using peatlands for oil palm cultivation.
5) Decree of the deputy for the coordination of natural resources
and services, the coordinating ministry for the maritime sector
No. 05/DII/MARITIM/II/2019 regarding the formation of a work
team for the preparation of a road map for mitigation and
adaptation of land subsidence in the coastal lowlands in 2019
6) Decree of The Minister of National Development Planning / Head
of The National Development Planning Agency No.
KEP.89/M.PPN/HK/10/2020 Concerning Establishment of a
Strategic Coordination Team Wetland Management for The
Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals and
Development of Low Carbon
Planned Activities  Review the existing policies and regulations related to

(Text Answer): wetlands conservation and management
 Implement restoration plans in 7 provinces based on
indicative peat restoration maps.
 Implement labor-intensive national economic recovery
projects for mangrove with a total planting target of 15,000
hectares
 Implementation of the Lake Saving Movement program
(GERMADAN)
47
Outcomes achieved by
1) Land subsidence in the coastal lowlands is controlled so as to
2021 and how they
guarantee the protection, preservation and utilization of the
contribute to achievement
coastal ecosystem as a life support system
of the Aichi Targets and
Sustainable Development 2) Restoration of mangrove ecosystem for environmental
Goals conservation as well as economic opportunity for coastal
communities
Note: this field has to be 3) Establishing guidelines for the private sector in peat conservation
completed when the full efforts in the concession area, namely by referring to the Peat
report is submitted in Hydrological Unit Map and FEG (Peat Ecosystem Function)
January 2021
4) Preparing priority action plan for lake restoration
Additional information:
Target 2. Water use respects wetland ecosystem needs for them to fulfil their functions and provide
services at the appropriate scale inter alia at the basin level or along a coastal zone.
{Reference to Aichi Targets 7 and 8], [Sustainable Development Goal 6, Indicator 6.3.1]

answer
National Targets (Text  Saving the priority lakes
Answer):  National food security
Planned Activities  Determine the carrying capacity of water resources

(Text Answer):  Implementation of food estate development by the Ministry of
Agriculture, in an area of 1000 ha
 Application of practices for sustainable management of tropical
peatlands, including the development of sustainable cultivation of
native peat plants without drainage (paludiculture)
Outcomes achieved by  Availability of clean water

2021 and how they  Food security
contribute to achievement  Improvement of local economy for communities living around
of the Aichi Targets and wetland areas
Sustainable Development
Goals

January 2021
48
Target 3. Public and private sectors have increased their efforts to apply guidelines and good practices
for the wise use of water and wetlands. {1.10}.
[Reference to Aichi Targets 3, 4, 7 and 8]

answer
National Targets (Text Public and private sectors have increased their efforts to apply
Answer): guidelines and good practices for the wise use of water and wetlands.
For example, the program of PSBL3 which regulate the engagement of
private sector on the control and conservation of water resources
Planned Activities Law on the Creation of Work (UU Cipta Kerja) has been signed on
(Text Answer): 2nd November 2020. The law includes environmental aspects which
should be followed up with subsidiary laws.
Outcomes achieved by Biodiversity within the concession is protected

2021 and how they
Goals

January 2021
Target 4. Invasive alien species and pathways of introduction and expansion are identified and
prioritized, priority invasive alien species are controlled or eradicated, and management responses are
prepared and implemented to prevent their introduction and establishment.

Priority of the target: B= A= High; B= Medium; C= Low; D= Not relevant; E= No
Medium answer
National Targets (Text management and control of foreign invasive species in Indonesia in a
Answer): systematic and integrated manner
The Ministry of Environment and Forestry has included the IAS

management program in the 2020-2024 KSDAE RPJMN (National
Medium Term Development Plan) so that every year there will be IAS
handling activities in several selected conservation areas.
49
Planned Activities Controlling IAS expansion to achieve ecological balance of wetlands
(Text Answer): through :
1) Implementation of National Strategy and Direction of Action
Plan for Management of Invasive Foreign Species in
Indonesia, 2015
2) Indonesia has issued a Ministerial Regulation (Minister of
Environment and Forestry) 94/2016 on Invasive Species
3) Regulation of DG KSDAE No. P.4/KSDAE/Set/KSA.2/11/2019
concerning Procedures for Risk Analysis of Invasive Plant
Species on protected area
4) Conducting IAS risk analysis in selected UPTs that have
conservation area problems, including wetlands with IAS;
5) Construction and development of the IAS data base
6) Multistakeholder coordination, communication and
collaboration
Outcomes achieved by The protection of biodiversity from the threat of Invasive alien
2021 and how they species
Goals

January 2021
Goal 2. Effectively conserving and managing the Ramsar Site network

[Reference to Sustainable Development Goals 6,11,13,14, 15]
Target 5. The ecological character of Ramsar Sites is maintained or restored through effective, planning
and integrated management {2.1.}.
[Reference to Aichi Target 6,11, 12]

answer
National Targets (Text By 2024, improve effectiveness management on Ramsar Site
Answer):
Planned Activities  Implement The Strategic Plan Directorate General Conservation of
(Text Answer): Natural Resources and Ecosystems In 2020-2024
 Protection on Ramsar site activities (e.g involve local community
surrounding ramsar site on security and patrol activity , boundary
50
socialization)
 Biodiversity preservation (eg. Rehabilitation/ restoration, species
identification and inventory, enrichment in Ramsar site)
 Sustainable tourism utilization (improve capacity building for local
community in tourism activity).
Outcomes achieved by  Ramsar site status and functionality established

2021 and how they  Providing access to traditional uses to the community at
contribute to achievement conservation areas through conservation partnerships are
of the Aichi Targets and increasingly open
Sustainable Development  The handling of opened areas in conservation areas
Goals  Conservation areas whose management effectiveness should be
improved
January 2021
Target 7. Sites that are at risk of change of ecological character have threats addressed {2.6.}.

answer
National Targets (Text Reference to Aichi Targets 5, 7, 11, 12
Answer):
Planned Activities  Implement the Strategic Plan of Directorate General Conservation
(Text Answer): of Natural Resources and Ecosystems for 2020-2024
Outcomes achieved by The increasing number of entities that sustainably use, protect and
2021 and how they preserve endangered species and genetic diversity
of the Aichi Targets and This target is expected to be achieved by the end of 2024.
Goals

January 2021
51
Goal 3. Wisely Using All Wetlands
Target 8. National wetland inventories have been either initiated, completed or updated and
disseminated and used for promoting the conservation and effective management of all wetlands
{1.1.1} KRA 1.1.i.
[Reference to Aichi Targets 12, 14, 18, 19].

answer
National Targets (Text  Medium Term Development Plan IV 2020-2024
Answer):  Regulation Of The Director General Conservation Of Natural
Resources And Ecosystems Number: P.6 / Ksdae / Set.3 /
Ren.0 / 9/2020 About Strategic Plan Of The Directorate
General Conservation Of Natural Resources And Ecosystems
In 2020-2024
Planned Activities  Reactivating of national Wetlands Committee
(Text Answer):  Improving national and sub national working group related to
wetlands
Outcomes achieved by The area is inventoried and performance by value biodiversity

2021 and how they participatory in outside the Conservation Area (Million Hectares)
of the Aichi Targets and This target is expected to be achieved by the end of 2024.
Goals

January 2021
Target 9. The wise use of wetlands is strengthened through integrated resource management at the
appropriate scale, inter alia, within a river basin or along a coastal zone {1.3.}.
[Reference to Aichi Targets 4, 6, 7].

answer
National Targets (Text Synchronization of all activities on coastal zone management
Answer):
52
Planned Activities Implement are :
(Text Answer):  Medium Term Development Plan IV 2020-2024
 Regulation Of The Director General Conservation Of Natural
Resources And Ecosystems Number: P.6 / Ksdae / Set.3 / Ren.0
/ 9/2020 About Strategic Plan Of The Directorate General
Conservation Of Natural Resources And Ecosystems In 2020-
2024
Outcomes achieved by Wise use of wetlands is integrated at the appropriate scale
2021 and how they
Goals

January 2021
Target 10. The traditional knowledge innovations and practices of indigenous peoples and local
communities relevant for the wise use of wetlands and their customary use of wetland resources, are
documented, respected, subject to national legislation and relevant international obligations and fully
integrated and reflected in the implementation of the Convention with a full and effective participation
of indigenous and local communities at all relevant levels.
[Reference to Aichi Target 18].

answer
National Targets (Text  Involve the traditional knowledge in development wetlands
Answer): conservation policy
 Refer to Regulation Of The Director General Conservation Of
Natural Resources And Ecosystems Number: P.6 / Ksdae / Set.3
/ Ren.0 / 9/2020 About Strategic Plan Of The Directorate
General Conservation Of Natural Resources And Ecosystems In
2020-2024
Planned Activities  Compile documentation/research results that have been made
(Text Answer): by Ministries/Agencies, NGOs, knowledge centers and other
institutions related to traditional knowledge or local wisdom in
wetland conservation
 Identify local wisdom that is relevant or can be integrated into
national regulations / policies
 Encourage the implementation of the practice / policy in national
regulations / policies
53
Outcomes achieved by Management of conservation forest areas in the traditional zone is
2021 and how they achieved through partnership
Goals

January 2021
Target 11. Wetland functions, services and benefits are widely demonstrated, documented and
disseminated. {1.4.}.
[Reference to Aichi Targets 1, 2, 13, 14].

answer
National Targets (Text  By 2018, studies of the wetlands disaster prone areas (focusing
Answer): on Peatland and mangrove) are undertaken.
• Medium Term Development Plan IV 2020-2024
• Regulation Of The Director General Conservation Of Natural
Resources And Ecosystems Number: P.6 / Ksdae / Set.3 / Ren.0 /
9/2020 About Strategic Plan Of The Directorate General
Conservation Of Natural Resources And Ecosystems In 2020-
2024
Planned Activities  Mapping of peatland areas overlaid with canals,
(Text Answer): hotspots/haze/fires (prioritize on 7 provinces; South Sumatera,
Jambi, Riau, South Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, East Kalimantan
and Papua)
 Implement the Strategic Plan Of The Directorate General
Conservation Of Natural Resources And Ecosystems In 2020-2024
Outcomes achieved by  Fulfilment of water needs for the surrounding community

2021 and how they conservation area for daily needs and the amount of energy that
contribute to achievement is absorbed in the framework of exploiting water utilization in the
of the Aichi Targets and area conservation.
Sustainable Development  Outcomes from energy utilization activities This water is the
Goals amount of Kwh produced increases

January 2021
54
Target 12. Restoration is in progress in degraded wetlands, with priority to wetlands that are relevant
for biodiversity conservation, disaster risk reduction, livelihoods and/or climate change mitigation and
adaptation. {1.8.}.

Priority of the target : A= High A= High; B= Medium; C= Low; D= Not relevant; E= No
answer
National Targets (Text In 2024, six hundred thousand (600,000) hectares of mangroves will
Answer): be restored
Planned Activities  Identify priorities and implementation for wetland restoration
(Text Answer): projects, in close coordination with the National Peatland
Restoration Agency (BRG).
 Restoration of degraded coastal areas is carried out by Wetlands
International in collaboration with Ministry of Public work and
Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fishery.
 Carrying out mangrove rehabilitation program as a national priority
policy
 Compiling a mangrove rehabilitation roadmap covering an area of
600 hectares for 4 years
 Establishing the National Peatland and Mangrove Restoration
Agency
Outcomes achieved by 150.000 hectare of peatland and mangrove will be restored
2021 and how they
Goals

January 2021
Target 13. Enhanced sustainability of key sectors such as water, energy, mining, agriculture, tourism,
urban development, infrastructure, industry, forestry, aquaculture and fisheries when they affect
wetlands, contributing to biodiversity conservation and human livelihoods.
55
answer
National Targets (Text  Medium Term Development Plan IV 2020-2024
Answer):  Regulation Of The Director General Conservation Of Natural
Resources And Ecosystems Number: P.6 / Ksdae / Set.3 / Ren.0 /
9/2020 About Strategic Plan Of The Directorate General
Conservation Of Natural Resources And Ecosystems In 2020-2024
Planned Activities  Ensure wetlands conservation into the revised of Law regarding
(Text Answer): water resource management
 Ensure wetlands conservation include on regulation regarding
conservation ecosystem and nature
Outcomes achieved by The wise use management of wetlands is integrated in all sectors
2021 and how they
Goals

January 2021
Goal 4. Enhancing implementation

Target 15. Ramsar Regional Initiatives with the active involvement and support of the Parties in each
region are reinforced and developed into effective tools to assist in the full implementation of the
Convention. {3.2.}

Priority of the target: B= A= High; B= Medium; C= Low; D= Not relevant; E= No
Medium answer
Resourcing: E= No A= Good; B= Adequate; C= Limiting; D= Severely
answer limiting; E= No answer
National Targets (Text
Answer):
Planned Activities Knowledge sharing
(Text Answer):
Outcomes achieved by Continuously provide technical supervision to all Technical
2021 and how they Implementation Units accross the country
56
Goals

January 2021
Target 16. Wetlands conservation and wise use are mainstreamed through communication, capacity
development, education, participation and awareness {4.1}.

answer
National Targets (Text
Answer):
Planned Activities  Awareness materials related to Peatland Management best
(Text Answer): practice will be produced
 Guidebook/manual for sylvo-fishery (brackish water ponds
integrated with mangrove trees) in degraded coastal areas will be
developed
 Implement actions, including annual celebration of World
Wetlands Day
2021 and how they Celebration of World Wetlands Day and other related celebrations
contribute to achievement (such as World Water Day), including the distribution of awareness
of the Aichi Targets and and communication materials, with the aim of increasing public
Sustainable Development awareness on the importance of sustainable use of wetlands.
Goals

January 2021
Target 17. Financial and other resources for effectively implementing the fourth Ramsar Strategic Plan
2016 – 2024 from all sources are made available. {4.2.}.
[Reference to Aichi Target 20].
57
answer
National Targets (Text a) The Indonesian government (MoEF and BRG) supports and
Answer): allocates budget for peatland and mangrove restoration as part of
its commitment in reducing GHG emission of 29% by 2030
b) Apart from government funding, resources are also provided by
international donors (eg. MCA/MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE
ACCOUNT, IUCN’s mangrove for the future. Building with nature
funded by IKI-Germany, Sustainable water fund of Netherland,
partners for resilience project funded by the Netherland Red
Cross
Planned Activities  Identify priority areas for peatland and mangrove restoration
(Text Answer):  Lobby and advocacy on integrating Risk and Management of
lowland wetlands areas (Peatland and mangrove)
 Develop and the research proposal and others activities related to
the implementation of planning activities on wetland to the centre
and local government, to develop international research
collaboration in the study of tropical inland waters with South East
Asia, Europe countries and Japan.
2021 and how they Continuing wetland restoration program, especially peatland and
contribute to achievement mangrove
Goals

January 2021
Target 18. International cooperation is strengthened at all levels {3.1}

answer
National Targets (Text  Regular meetings occur between Indonesian Ramsar National Focal
Answer): Points and other biodiversity and wetlands-related
 Jointly Organizing Asian Water Bird census
 Jointly organizing WWD with International NGOs, Research

Agencies, Foreign Embassies in Indonesia
58
 Continue to participate in the East-Asian Australasian Flyway
Partnership, including nomination of a new Flyway site
Planned Activities
(Text Answer):
Outcomes achieved by Continuing Asian Waterbird Census and participation on
2021 and how they international (online & offline) meetings
Goals

January 2021
Target 19. Capacity building for implementation of the Convention and the 4th Ramsar
Strategic Plan 2016 – 2024 is enhanced.

answer
National Targets (Text Training courses, workshops and seminars are delivered on wetland
Answer): management, restoration and monitoring.
Planned Activities  NGOs, universities, research organizations and wetland centers
(Text Answer): deliver formal and informal training courses and workshops to local
NGOs, students, agency staff, wetland managers, community
volunteers, and others.
 To develop accurate and useful databases, particularly for tropical
inland water systems, exchange scientific knowledge, increase
human resources capacity, share research facilities through JSPS,
IPH, APCE and research collaboration with South East Asia, Europe
countries and Japan.
 Adding module regarding wetlands conservation into training and
education curriculum.
2021 and how they The increasing ability of Ramsar Sites managers
Goals

59
January 2021
60
Section 5: Optional annex to enable Contracting Parties to provide additional
voluntary information on designated Wetlands of International Importance
(Ramsar Sites)
Guidance for filling in this section
1. Contracting Parties can opt to provide additional information specific to any or all of their
designated Ramsar Sites.
2. The only indicator questions included in this section are those from Section 3 of the COP14 NRF
which directly concern Ramsar Sites.
3. In some cases, to make them meaningful in the context of reporting on each Ramsar Site
separately, some of these indicator questions and/or their answer options have been adjusted
from their formulation in Section 3 of the COP14 NRF.
4. Please include information on only one site in each row. In the appropriate columns please add
the name and official site number (from the Ramsar Sites Information Service).
5. For each ‘indicator question’, please select one answer from the legend.
6. A final column of this Annex is provided as a ‘free text’ box for the inclusion of any additional
information concerning the Ramsar Site.
61
Name of Contracting Party: INDONESIA
List of indicator questions:
5.6 Has the Ramsar Site been assessed regarding the effectiveness of its management (i.e. sites
with either a formal management plan) or management via other relevant means where
they exist e.g through existing actions for appropriate wetland management ?
5.7 Has a cross-sectoral site management committee been established for the site?
11.1 Has an assessment been made of the ecosystem benefits/services provided by the Ramsar
Site?
11.3 Have socio-economic values of wetlands been included in the management planning for the
Ramsar Site?
11.4 Have cultural values of wetlands been included in the management planning for the Ramsar
Site including traditional knowledge for the effective management of sites (Resolution
VIII.19?
16.3a Is stakeholder participation in decision-making promoted, especially with local stakeholder

involvement in the management of the Ramsar Site?
16.6a Have communication mechanisms been established to share information between the
Ramsar Administrative Authority and the Ramsar Site manager(s)?
62
Ramsar Ramsar 5.6 5.7 11.1 11.3 11.4 16.3a 16.6a Any additional
Site Site        comments/infor
number name mation about
the site
2192 Tanjung A – Yes B=No A-Yes, A – Yes Yes A-Yes, A-Yes,
Puting
Nationa the namely through namely by namely by although it is
l Park assessment is the METT preparing a opening a not done as a
carried out (Management forum as a space business space whole with
using the Effectiveness for socio- for traditional local
METT Tracking Tool) economic communities in stakeholder
(Management assessment. management of carrying on local involvement
Effectiveness Where this traditional wisdom to utilize (local
Tracking Tool) evaluation is communities in natural government).
assessment carried out to the national park resources Because
tool in order to see to what zoning system, through fishing several
monitor the extent namely in the businesses in the decisions in
level of management traditional zone. traditional zone. sustainable
effectiveness has been carried In addition, to management
of national out. From the establish remain under
park evaluated relationships in the authority
management. elements will the form of of the central
provide output cooperation government.
in the form of agreements with However, the
products and traditional implementatio
services communities in n of
(output) and the managing coordination
impact business space in and
(outcome) of an effort to consultation
the planning increase welfare. to run a
carried out the management
assessment. system that is
synergized
among all
the site
stakeholders is
always carried
out.
1945 Sembila A – Yes B=No A – Yes A – Yes A – Yes A – Yes A-Yes,

ng
Nationa
l Park
1944 Rawa A – Yes B=No A – Yes A – Yes A – Yes A – Yes A-Yes,
Aopa
Nationa
l Park
1987 Rambut A – Yes A – Yes A – Yes A – Yes A – Yes Burung

Island
B=No A-Yes,
Indonesia and
Wildlife Yayasan lahan
Reserve An evaluation The socio- The cultural The other mechanism for
The Forestry Basah
has been done economic value of stakeholder communication sharing
Office of (Wetlands
on the valuation has wetlands has might between AA and Site
Jakarta International
environment been included also been engage on Management are
(BKSDA) as Indonesia)
service on the included on the the provision conducted through the
the manager organized
provided by the management management of input SIDAK online sites of DG
of the annual
Reserve as a planning of SM of Ramsar site, (through KSDAE.
conservatio waterbird
Ramsar site Pulau Rambut including the FGD,
n area census as part
local coordination
including of the Asian
knowledge on ), but the
the Pulau
the effective decision
64
the site
Rambut management making is Waterbird
Wildlife of the site. merely the Census
Sanctuary responsible
has of the
conducted Management
an annual
managemen
t
effectivenes
s
assessment
of the
conservatio
n area. The
year 2020
has been
assessed
regarding its
managemen
t
effectivenes.
The results
of the METT
assessment
on the Pulau
Rambut
Wildlife
Refuge as
the Ramsar
65
the site
site were
73%. The
assessment
was also
carried out
in other
areas,
namely TWA
Angke
Kapuk 82%,
Muara
Angke
Wildlife
Reserve 73%
and CA
Bokor Island
70%.
667 Danau A – Yes B=No A – Yes A – Yes A – Yes A – Yes A-Yes,
Sentaru
m
Nationa
l Park
554 Berbak A – Yes B=No A – Yes A – Yes A – Yes A – Yes A-Yes,
Nationa
l Park
1624 Wasur D= Planned B=No C=Partially A=Yes A=Yes A=Yes A=Yes There are 4 large
Nationa tribes: Kanume,
l Park Marind, Marory
Men-
Gey, and Yei-
66
the site
Nan, who stay a
nd live in Wasur
NP.
All the tribes insi
de the park still f
ollow the traditio
ns passed down
by their ancesto
r. Daily, their liv
es revolve aroun
d collecting sago
, planting, hunti
ng, and fishing
within an area c
alled a “Dusun”.
They go to a Dus
un not only to co
llect food but als
o to fulfill their s
piritual needs in
visiting the land
of their ancestor
s. Traditional pe
ople manage th
eir resources by
customary law. T
here are traditio
nal rules of utiliz
ing natural reso
urces such as hu
nting season & h
arvesting area n
67
the site
amed “Sasi”. Sa
si is traditional
wisdom where th
e local people cl
ose apart of the
area from all utili
zing activity for
certain periods u
ntil resources re
covered. Other t
raditional people
customs are sac
red area, mytho
s, season calend
ar, and fire man
agement
 A=Yes; B=No; D=Planned

 A=Yes; B=No; C=Partially; D=Planned
 A=Yes; B=No; C=Partially; Z=No Management Plan
68

COP14NR Indonesia e

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

COP14NR Indonesia e

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

COP14NR Indonesia e

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION

OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS

National Reports to be submitted to the 14th Meeting

The purpose of this Microsoft Word form is to help Contracting Parties to

4. This COP14 NRF includes 90 indicator questions. In addition, Section 4 is provided as an

iii) providing information on specific implementation issues in support of the provision of

12. The COP14 National Report Format (NRF) is in five sections:

15. The deadline for submission of national targets is by 24 January 2020.

Planning of National Targets

Note: this field has to be

Section 1: Institutional information

Name of Contracting Party:INDONESIA

Designated Ramsar Administrative Authority

Goal 1. Addressing the drivers of wetland loss and degradation

1) Law 32/2009 on The Protection and Management of Environment

 Promotion of Paludiculture practices on peatlands, through the establishment of Indonesian

2.12 Additional information:

2.14 Additional information: If Yes, please provide an example

1) Berbak – Sembilang National Park collaboration with Sinar Mas Group

PROPER is an assessment of a company's environmental management performance that requires

Facilitating the development of village resources management agreement (Kesepakatan

Peatland moratorium – Presidential Instruction 5/2019 concerning the termination of new

1) Indonesia has released a Ministerial Regulation (Minister of Environment and Forestry)

7.1 Are mechanisms in place for the Administrative Authority to be A=Yes

Goal 3. Wisely using all wetlands

Especially mangrove, coral reef and sea grass

Changes in wetlands condition reported by stakeholders

Area by type of wetland Total area by

Guidance on information on national wetland extent, to be provided in Target 8 “National

9.3 Are wetlands treated as natural water infrastructure integral to A=Yes

9.4 Have Communication, Education, Participation and Awareness A=Yes

Through Regulation of Director General of Climate Change No. P.4/PPI/SET/Kum.I/II/2009 on the

The government is currently formulating a regulation regarding ecosystem essential management,

a) stakeholders, including local communities and indigenous people

(Resolution VII. 8) (Action 6.1.5)

Strategic Environmental Assessment as a key document in the preparation of the country’s

Various Community base projects include issues on poverty alleviation

11.4 Have cultural values of wetlands been included in the A=Yes

1) Accelerating peat ecosystem recovery and restoration activities, namely peat

a) Knowledge of global resources

b) Education and public awareness on peatlands

d) Wise use of peatlands

e) Research networks, regional centers of expertise, and institutional capacity

13.2 Are Environmental Impact Assessments made for any

Goal 4. Enhancing implementation

Activities organized by RRCEA, EAAFP, ACB, International Tropical Peatlands Center,

15.2 Has your country supported or participated in the development of A=Yes

The action plan that is made is not just a Ramsar framework

16.3 Does the Contracting Party: A=Yes; B=No;

Aadministrative Authority organizes the Annual Technical Supervision Meeting to coordinate

16.7 Have Ramsar-branded World Wetlands Day activities (whether on 2 A=Yes

17.3 [For Contracting Parties with a development assistance agency

17.5 [For Contracting Parties that have received development A=Yes

e.g UNDP Tiger, KFW Forest VI

Target 18. International cooperation is strengthened at all levels {3.1}

e.g UNDP Tiger

Heart of Borneo, Wasur Tonda

Conduct technical guidance regarding the Proposal of a new Ramsar Site