Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Reliable and Energy-Efficient Downward Packet Delivery in Asymmetric Transmission Power-Based Networks

Published: 22 September 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In low-power wireless networks, maintaining multihop connectivity is considered effective in constructing communication routes between individual nodes to a gateway. Since sensor networks are typically used for data collection, multihop routing protocols are designed to find routes optimal in upward directions. As sensor networks become widely applied to diverse applications, efficient downward traffic delivery also becomes important. To achieve this, we consider an asymmetric transmission power-based network (APN), where a power-supplied gateway uses high-power radios to cover the entire network via single-hop transmission, whereas common nodes use low-power transmissions. For effective APN operations, we propose a single-hop downlink protocol (SHDP) that consists of direct downlink transmission, local acknowledgment, neighbor forwarding, and contention resolution among the destination’s neighbors. We evaluate SHDP through mathematical analysis, simulations, and testbed experiments. Our proposal outperforms other competitive multihop routing protocols. Specifically, SHDP shows high packet delivery performance and lowers the duty cycle greatly while reducing the packet transmission overhead by >50%.

References

[1]
E. Ancillotti, R. Bruno, and M. Conti. 2013. The role of the RPL routing protocol for smart grid communications. IEEE Communications Magazine 51, 1 (Jan. 2013), 75--83. 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6400442
[2]
E. Ancillotti, R. Bruno, and M. Conti. 2014. Reliable data delivery with the IETF routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 10, 3 (Aug. 2014), 1864--1877.
[3]
Aruba Networks. 2012. Technology advances in retail: Improving margins using wireless networks. Available at: http://www.arubanetworks.com/pdf/technology/whitepapers/wp_Retail_advances.pdf. (2012).
[4]
M. Buevich, D. Schnitzer, T. Escalada, A. Jacquiau-Chamski, and A. Rowe. 2014. Fine-grained remote monitoring, control and pre-paid electrical service in rural microgrids. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’14). 1--11.
[5]
M. Ceriotti, M. Corra, L. D’Orazio, R. Doriguzzi, D. Facchin, S. T. Guna, G. P. Jesi, R. Lo Cigno, L. Mottola, A. L. Murphy, M. Pescalli, G. P. Picco, D. Pregnolato, and C. Torghele. 2011. Is there light at the ends of the tunnel? Wireless sensor networks for adaptive lighting in road tunnels. In 2011 10th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’11). 187--198.
[6]
Y. Chen and A. Terzis. 2011. On the implications of the log-normal path loss model: An efficient method to deploy and move sensor motes. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'11). 26--39.
[7]
Y.-J. Choi, S. Park, and S. Bahk. 2006. Multichannel random access in OFDMA wireless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 24, 3 (Mar. 2006), 603--613. 10.1109/JSAC.2005.862422
[8]
Cisco. 2015. Connected grid networks for smart grid - field area network. http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/energy/field_area_network.html. (2015).
[9]
T. Clausen, U. Herberg, and M. Philipp. 2011. A critical evaluation of the IPv6 routing protocol for low power and lossy networks (RPL). In 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob’11). 365--372.
[10]
Federal Communications Commission. 1993. FCC power regulation. Available at: http://transition.fcc.gov/ Bureaus/Engineering Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet63/oet63rev.pdf. (1993).
[11]
J. Fink, A. Ribeiro, and V. Kumar. 2012. Robust control for mobility and wireless communication in cyber physical systems with application to robot teams. Proceedings of the IEEE 100, 1 (Jan. 2012), 164--178.
[12]
S. Ganesh and R. Amutha. 2013. Efficient and secure routing protocol for wireless sensor networks through SNR based dynamic clustering mechanisms. Journal of Communications and Networks 15, 4 (Aug. 2013), 422--429.
[13]
O. Gnawali, R. Fonseca, K. Jamieson, and P. Levis. 2008. CTP: Robust and efficient collection through control and data plane integration. Stanford Information Networks Group Technical Report SING-08-02. (2008).
[14]
IEEE Std 802.11-2009 2009. IEEE Standard for Information Technology-- Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-- Specific Requirements-- Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 5: Enhancements for Higher Throughput. (Oct 2009).
[15]
IEEE Std 802.15.4-2003 2003. Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs). Available at http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG4.html. (May 2003).
[16]
H.-S. Kim. 2013. SHDP simulator. Available at: http://netlab.snu.ac.kr/∼hskim. (2013).
[17]
H.-S. Kim, Y.-J. Choi, and S. Bahk. 2014. Elimination of multi-hop transmission form downlink in low power and lossy networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Communications (ICC'14).
[18]
H.-S. Kim, H. Im, M.-S. Lee, J. Paek, and S. Bahk. 2015a. A measurement study of TCP over RPL in low-power and lossy networks. Journal of Communications and Networks 17, 6 (Dec. 2015), 647--655.
[19]
H.-S. Kim, J. Paek, and S. Bahk. 2015b. QU-RPL: Queue utilization based RPL for load balancing in large scale industrial applications. In IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON’15).
[20]
J.-G. Ko, S. Dawson-Haggerty, O. Gnawali, D. Culler, and A. Terzis. 2011. Evaluating the performance of RPL and 6LoWPAN in TinyOS. In Workshop on Extending the Internet to Low Power and Lossy Networks (IP+SN’11).
[21]
J. Ko, J. Jeong, J. Park, J. A. Jun, O. Gnawali, and J. Paek. 2015. DualMOP-RPL: Supporting multiple modes of downward routing in a single RPL network. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 11, 2, Article 39 (2015), 20 pages.
[22]
J.-G. Ko, J.-H. Lim, Y. Chen, R. Musaloiu-E., A. Terzis, G. Masson, T. Gao, W. Destler, L. Selavo, and R. Dutton. 2010. MEDiSN: Medical emergency detection in sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS), Special Issue on Wireless Health Systems (2010).
[23]
J.-G. Ko, A. Terzis, S. Dawson-Haggerty, D. E. Culler, J. W. Hui, and P. Levis. 2011. Connecting low-power and lossy networks to the Internet. IEEE Communications Magazine 49, 4 (Apr. 2011), 96--101.
[24]
O. Landsiedel, E. Ghadimi, S. Duquennoy, and M. Johansson. 2012. Low power, low delay: Opportunistic routing meets duty cycling. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'12). 185--196.
[25]
N. Li and J. C. Hou. 2004. Topology control in heterogeneous wireless networks: problems and solutions. In 23rd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM’04), Vol. 1. 243.
[26]
P. Li and Y. Fang. 2012. On the throughput capacity of heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 11, 12 (Dec. 2012), 2073--2086.
[27]
S. Lin, J. Zhang, G. Zhou, L. Gu, J. A. Stankovic, and T. He. 2006. ATPC: Adaptive transmission power control for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’06). ACM, New York, NY, 223--236. 10.1145/1182807.1182830
[28]
K. Lorincz, D. J. Malan, T. R. F. Fulford-Jones, A. Nawoj, A. Clavel, V. Shnayder, G. Mainland, M. Welsh, and S. Moulton. 2004. Sensor networks for emergency response: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3, 4 (Oct. 2004), 16--23.
[29]
M. Marot, B. Kusy, G. Simon, and A. Ledeczi. 2004. The flooding time synchronization protocol. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’04). 39--49.
[30]
MAXFOR Technology. 2014. WSN communication module, MTM-CM3300MSP. Available at: http://www.maxfor.co.kr/datasheet/MAXFOR_Digital_Brochure.pdf. (2014).
[31]
G. Montenegro, N. Kushalnagar, J. Hui, and D. Culler. 2007. Transmission of IPv6 packets over IEEE 802.15.4 networks. RFC 4944 (Sept. 2007).
[32]
D. Moss and P. Levis. 2008. BoX-MACs: Exploiting Physical and Link Layer Boundaries in Low-Power Networking. Technical Report SING-08-00. Stanford Information Networks Group.
[33]
Moteiv Corporation. 2006. Tmote Sky Datasheet. http://www.moteiv.com/products/docs/tmote-sky-datasheet. pdf. (2006).
[34]
W. Pak, K.-T. Cho, J. Lee, and S. Bahk. 2008. W-MAC: Supporting ultra low duty cycle in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM'08). 1--5.
[35]
D. Puccinelli, S. Giordano, M. Zuniga, and P. J. Marrón. 2012. Broadcast-free collection protocol. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'12). 29--42.
[36]
K. Srinivasan, P. Dutta, A. Tavakoli, and P. Levis. 2010. An empirical study of low-power wireless. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networking 6, 2, Article 16 (March 2010), 49 pages. 10.1145/1689239.1689246
[37]
Texas Instruments. 2006. 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee-ready RF transceiver. Available at: http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cc2420.pdf. (2006).
[38]
Texas Instruments. 2006. MSP430 Ultra-low-power microcontrollers. (2006).
[39]
F. Wang and J. Liu. 2009. Duty-cycle-aware broadcast in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM'09). 468--476.
[40]
G. Werner-Allen, K. Lorincz, J. Johnson, J. Lees, and M. Welsh. 2006. Fidelity and yield in a volcano monitoring sensor network. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI’06). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, 381--396. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1298455.1298491
[41]
T. Winter, P. Thubert, A. Brandt, J. Hui, R. Kelsey, P. Levis, K. Pister, R. Struik, J. P. Vasseur, and R. Alexander. 2012. RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. RFC 6550 (2012).
[42]
K. S. Yildirim and A. Kantarci. 2014. Time synchronization based on slow-flooding in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 25, 1 (Jan. 2014), 244--253.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Reliable and Energy-Efficient Downward Packet Delivery in Asymmetric Transmission Power-Based Networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
    ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 12, Issue 4
    November 2016
    309 pages
    ISSN:1550-4859
    EISSN:1550-4867
    DOI:10.1145/2994619
    • Editor:
    • Chenyang Lu
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Journal Family

    Publication History

    Published: 22 September 2016
    Accepted: 01 August 2016
    Revised: 01 October 2015
    Received: 01 October 2014
    Published in TOSN Volume 12, Issue 4

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Low power and lossy network
    2. RPL
    3. asymmetric power network
    4. downward packet delivery
    5. energy efficiency
    6. wireless sensor network

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    • Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
    • Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)
    • Republic of Korea
    • ICT R&D program of MSIP/IITP
    • Ministry of Health & Welfare
    • Ministry of Education
    • Korea government (MSIP)
    • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)ODM-RPL: Optimized Dual MOP RPL2021 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC)10.1109/ISCC53001.2021.9631422(1-6)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2021
    • (2020)PC-RPLACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/337202616:2(1-32)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2020
    • (2020)Know when to listenComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2019.12.023150:C(672-686)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2020
    • (2019)No way back? An SDN protocol for directed IoT networks2019 15th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS)10.23919/WONS.2019.8795491(1-8)Online publication date: Jan-2019
    • (2018)ORGMA: Reliable opportunistic routing with gradient forwarding for MANETsComputer Networks10.1016/j.comnet.2017.12.001131(52-64)Online publication date: Feb-2018
    • (2017)ORPL-DT: Opportunistic Routing for Diverse Traffic in Multihop IoT NetworksGLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference10.1109/GLOCOM.2017.8253953(1-6)Online publication date: Dec-2017
    • (2017)Challenging the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL): A SurveyIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2017.275161719:4(2502-2525)Online publication date: Dec-2018
    • (2017)DT-RPLComputer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking10.1016/j.comnet.2017.07.001126:C(150-161)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2017

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media