Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

3D-kCov-ComFor: An Energy-Efficient Framework for Composite Forwarding in Three-Dimensional Duty-Cycled k-Covered Wireless Sensor Networks

Published: 15 November 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Most existing work on coverage, connectivity, and geographic forwarding considers a two-dimensional (2D) space, where the sensors are deployed in a 2D field. However, there are several cases where the 2D assumption is not valid for the design of those types of wireless sensor networks (WSNs), such as underwater sensor deployment and sensors deployed on the trees of different heights in a forest. In this article, we investigate the problem of k-coverage in three-dimensional (3D) WSNs, where each point in a 3D field is covered by at least k sensors simultaneously. Moreover, it is commonly assumed in most of the work on the problem of geographic forwarding in WSNs that all the sensors are always on (or active) during the network operational lifetime, and, particularly, during data forwarding. However, this type of design is neither practical nor efficient for the sensors whose energy is crucial and limited. Therefore, we consider geographic forwarding in 3D duty-cycled k-covered WSNs, where the sensors can switch between on and off states (i.e., duty-cycled sensors) to save energy. First, we provide a rigorous analysis of the k-coverage problem in 3D WSNs using Helly's Theorem and the Reuleaux tetrahedron model, and compute the sensor spatial density to k-cover a 3D field. Second, based on this analysis, we compute a lower bound and an upper bound on the number of overlapping Reuleaux tetrahedra that are necessary to fill a 3D convex shape, such as the sensing sphere of a sensor. Third, using these results, we present a localized (i.e., based on local information of one-hop neighbors), pseudo-distributed (i.e., not fully distributed) protocol to achieve k-coverage of a 3D field with a reduced number of active sensors, while ensuring connectivity between them. Fourth, we discuss our composite geographic forwarding protocol for 3D duty-cycled k-covered WSNs using a combination of deterministic and opportunistic schemes to forward sensed data towards the sink. We will study the problem of 3D space filling (or space covering) in the context of the above-mentioned problems in 3D WSNs. Fifth, we relax two widely used assumptions, namely sensor homogeneity and sensing range convexity, to generalize our k-coverage protocol in 3D space. Last, we show several simulation results of our framework for joint k-coverage and composite geographic forwarding in 3D duty-cycled WSNs, called 3D-kCov-ComFor. We found a close-to-perfect match between our theoretical and simulation results.

References

[1]
I. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia. 2005. Underwater acoustic sensor networks: Research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks 3, 257--279.
[2]
S. Alam and Z. Haas. 2006. Coverage and connectivity in three-dimensional networks. In Proc. ACM MobiCom. 346--357.
[3]
H. M. Ammari. 2011. On the problem of k-coverage in 3D wireless sensor networks: A Reuleaux tetrahedron-based approach. In Proc. ISSNIP. 389--394.
[4]
H. M. Ammari and S. K. Das. 2012. Centralized and clustered k-coverage protocols for wireless sensor networks, IEEE TC 61, 1, 118--133.
[5]
H. M. Ammari and S. K. Das. 2010. A study of k-coverage and measures of connectivity in three-dimensional wireless sensor networks. IEEE TC 59, 2, 243--257.
[6]
H. M. Ammari and S. K. Das. 2009. Critical density for coverage and connectivity in three-dimensional wireless sensor networks using percolation theory. IEEE TPDS 20, 6, 872--885.
[7]
H. M. Ammari and S. K. Das. 2008. Joint k-coverage and hybrid forwarding in duty-cycled three-dimensional wireless sensor networks. In Proc. IEEE SECON. 170--178.
[8]
P. Balister, B. Bollobas, A. Sarkar, and S. Kumar. 2007. Reliable density estimates for achieving coverage and connectivity in thin strips of finite length. In Proc. ACM MobiCom. 75--86.
[9]
S. Biswas and R. Morris. 2005. ExOR: Opportunistic multi-hop routing for wireless networks. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM. 133--143.
[10]
B. Bollobás. 2006. The Art of Mathematics: Coffee Time in Memphis. Cambridge University Press.
[11]
J. Conway and S. Torquato. 2006. Tiling, packing, and covering with tetrahedra. PNAS 103, 28, 10612--10617.
[12]
S. Durocher, D. Kirkpatrick, and L. Narayanan. 2010. On routing with guaranteed delivery in three-dimensional ad hoc wireless networks. Wireless Networks, 16, 1, 227--235.
[13]
R. Flury and R. Wattenhofer. 2008. Randomized 3D geographic routing. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM. 834--842.
[14]
M. Goldberg. 1974. Three infinite families of tetrahedra space-fillers. Journal of Combinatorial Theory 16, 3, 348--354.
[15]
C. Huang, Y. Tseng, and H. Wu. 2007. Distributed protocols for ensuring both coverage and connectivity of a wireless sensor network. ACM TOSN 3, 1, 1--24.
[16]
X. Ji and H. Zha. 2004. Sensor positioning in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks using multidimensional scaling. In Proc. IEEE Infocom. 2652--2661.
[17]
G. Kao, T. Fevens, and J. Opatrny. 2005. Position-based routing on 3-D geometric graphs in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proc. CCCG.
[18]
S. Kumar, T. H. Lai, and J. Balogh. 2004. On k-coverage in a mostly sleeping sensor network. In Proc. ACM MobiCom, 144--158.
[19]
S. S. Lam and C. Qian. 2011. Geographic routing in d-dimensional spaces with guaranteed delivery and low stretch. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS. 257--268.
[20]
L. Liu and H. Ma. 2012. On coverage of wireless sensor networks for rolling terrains. IEEE TPDS 23, 1, 118--125.
[21]
W. J. Liu and K. T. Feng. 2009. Three-dimensional greedy anti-void routing for wireless sensor networks. IEEE TWireless 8, 12, 5796--5800.
[22]
MathWorld. 2016a. Reuleaux Tetrahedron. Retrieved from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ReuleauxTetrahedron.html.
[23]
MathWorld. 2016b. Reuleaux Triangle. Retrieved from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ReuleauxTriangle.html.
[24]
S. Nath and P. B. Gibbons. 2007. Communicating via fireflies: Geographic routing on duty-cycled sensors. In Proc. IPSN. 440--449.
[25]
S. Poduri, S. Pattem, B. Krishnamachari, and G. S. Sukhatme. 2006. Sensor network configuration and the curse of dimensionality. In Proc. IEEE EmNets.
[26]
D. Pompili, T. Melodia, and I. F. Akyildiz. 2009. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional deployment analysis for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 7, 4, 778--790.
[27]
D. Pompili and T. Melodia. 2005. Three-dimensional routing in underwater acoustic sensor networks. In Proc. PE-WASUN, 214--221.
[28]
V. Ravelomanana. 2004. Extremal properties of three-dimensional sensor networks with applications. IEEE TMC, 3, 3, 246--247.
[29]
T. El Salti and N. Nasser. 2008. Routing in three dimensional wireless sensor networks. In Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, 1--6.
[30]
D. M. Y. Sommerville. 1923. Space-filling tetrahedra in Euclidean space. In Proc. Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 41, 49--57.
[31]
H. Steinhaus. 1999. Mathematical Snapshots, Dover Publications.
[32]
M. T. Sun, K. Sakai, B. R. Hamilton, W. S. Ku, and X. Ma. 2011. G-STAR: Geometric STAteless Routing for 3-D wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 9, 341--354.
[33]
P. Wan and C. Yi. 2006. Coverage by randomly deployed wireless sensor networks. IEEE TIT, 52, 6, 2658--2669.
[34]
Y. Wang, C. W. Yi, M. Huang, and F. Li. 2013. Three dimensional greedy routing in large scale random wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 11, 4, 1331--1344.
[35]
D. Wells. 1991. The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry. Penguin Books, 1<sup>st</sup> Edition, 1991.
[36]
I. O. Wilhelm. 2008. Packing triangles on a sphere. www.math.uchicago.edu/&sim;may/VIGRE/VIGRE2008/REUPapers/Wilhelm.pdf.
[37]
S. Xia, X. Yin, H. Wu, M. Jin, and X. D. Gu. 2011. Deterministic greedy routing with guaranteed delivery in 3D wireless sensor networks. In Proc. ACM MobiHoc.
[38]
P. Xie, J. H. Cui, and L. Lao. 2006. VBF: Vector-based forwarding protocol for underwater sensor networks. In Proc. IFIP-TC6 Networking, 1216--1221.
[39]
P. Xie, Z. Zhou, Z. Peng, J. H. Cui, and Z. Shi. 2009. Void avoidance in three-dimensional mobile underwater sensor networks. In Proc. WASA, LNCS 5682, 305--314.
[40]
F. Ye, G. Zhong, J. Cheng, S. Lu, and L. Zhang. 2003. PEAS: A robust energy conserving protocol for long-lived sensor networks. In Proc. ICDCS.
[41]
W. Yu, L. Yingjian, and G. Zhongwen. 2012. Three-dimensional ocean sensor networks. J. Ocean Univ. China, 11, 4, 436--450.
[42]
C. Zhang, X. Bai, J. Teng, D. Xuan, and W. Jia. 2010. Constructing low-connectivity and full-coverage three dimensional sensor networks. IEEE JSAC, 28, 7, 984--993.
[43]
J. Zhao and R. Govindan. 2003. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proc. ACM SenSys, 1--13.
[44]
J. Zhou, Y. Chen, B. Leong, and P. Sundar. 2010. Practical 3D geographic routing for wireless sensor networks. In Proc. ACM SenSys, 337--350.
[45]
G. Zhou, T. He, S. Krishnamurthy, and J. Stankovic. 2004. Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks. In Proc. MobiSys. 125--138.
[46]
M. Zorzi and R. Rao. 2003. Geographic random forwarding (GeRaF) for ad hoc and sensor networks: Multihop performance. IEEE TMC 2, 4, 337--348.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Study of Node Distribution and Density Optimization in Mobile Sensor Network 3D SpaceWireless Communications & Mobile Computing10.1155/2021/69788122021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2021)On the Range Assignment in Wireless Sensor Networks for Minimizing the Coverage-Connectivity CostACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/345740817:4(1-48)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2021
  • (2019)An Enhanced Virtual Force Algorithm for Diverse k-Coverage Deployment of 3D Underwater Wireless Sensor NetworksSensors10.3390/s1916349619:16(3496)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. 3D-kCov-ComFor: An Energy-Efficient Framework for Composite Forwarding in Three-Dimensional Duty-Cycled k-Covered Wireless Sensor Networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
        ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 12, Issue 4
        November 2016
        309 pages
        ISSN:1550-4859
        EISSN:1550-4867
        DOI:10.1145/2994619
        • Editor:
        • Chenyang Lu
        Issue’s Table of Contents
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Journal Family

        Publication History

        Published: 15 November 2016
        Accepted: 01 September 2015
        Revised: 01 August 2015
        Received: 01 October 2014
        Published in TOSN Volume 12, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. k-coverage
        2. Helly’s theorem
        3. Reuleaux tetrahedron.
        4. Three-dimensional wireless sensor networks
        5. composite forwarding
        6. connectivity
        7. sensor duty-cycling
        8. space filling (space covering)

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

        Funding Sources

        • US National Science Foundation (NSF)

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2021)Study of Node Distribution and Density Optimization in Mobile Sensor Network 3D SpaceWireless Communications & Mobile Computing10.1155/2021/69788122021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
        • (2021)On the Range Assignment in Wireless Sensor Networks for Minimizing the Coverage-Connectivity CostACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/345740817:4(1-48)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2021
        • (2019)An Enhanced Virtual Force Algorithm for Diverse k-Coverage Deployment of 3D Underwater Wireless Sensor NetworksSensors10.3390/s1916349619:16(3496)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2019
        • (2019)A Survey on Deployment and Coverage Strategies in Three-Dimensional Wireless Sensor NetworksProceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications10.1145/3316615.3316716(544-549)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2019
        • (2018)Application Deployment Strategies for Spatial Isolation on Many-Core AcceleratorsACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/316838317:2(1-31)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2018
        • (2018)Loop-Oriented Pointer Analysis for Automatic SIMD VectorizationACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/316836417:2(1-31)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2018
        • (2018)Efficient and Reliable Error Detection Architectures of Hash-Counter-Hash Tweakable Enciphering SchemesACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/315917317:2(1-19)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2018
        • (2018)Memory-Constrained Vectorization and Scheduling of Dataflow Graphs for Hybrid CPU-GPU PlatformsACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/315766917:2(1-25)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2018
        • (2018)Attitude Fusion of Inertial and Magnetic Sensor under Different Magnetic Filed DistortionsACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/315766817:2(1-22)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2018
        • (2018)ShaVe-ICEACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/315766717:2(1-25)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2018
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Login options

        Full Access

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media