Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

On the Range Assignment in Wireless Sensor Networks for Minimizing the Coverage-Connectivity Cost

Published: 10 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

This article deals with reliable and unreliable mobile sensors having identical sensing radius r, communication radius R, provided that rR and initially randomly deployed on the plane by dropping them from an aircraft according to general random process. The sensors have to move from their initial random positions to the final destinations to provide greedy path k1-coverage simultaneously with k2-connectivity. In particular, we are interested in assigning the sensing radius r and communication radius R to minimize the time required and the energy consumption of transportation cost for sensors to provide the desired k1-coverage with k2-connectivity. We prove that for both of these optimization problems, the optimal solution is to assign the sensing radius equal to r = k1||E[S]||/2 and the communication radius R = k2||E[S]||/2, where ||E[S]|| is the characteristic of general random process according to which the sensors are deployed. When r< k1||E[S]||/2 or R< k2||E[S]||/ 2, and sensors are reliable, we discover and explain the sharp increase in the time required and the energy consumption in transportation cost to ensure the desired k1-coverage with k2-connectivity.

References

[1]
A. A. Abbasi, M. Younis, and K. Akkaya. 2009. Movement-assisted connectivity restoration in wireless sensor and actor networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 20, 9 (2009), 1366–1379.
[2]
F. Abbasi, A. Mesbahi, and J. Mohammadpour Velni. 2019. A new voronoi-based blanket coverage control method for moving sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol. 27, 1 (2019), 409–417.
[3]
H. M. Ammari. 2016. 3D-kCov-ComFor: An energy-efficient framework for composite forwarding in three-dimensional duty-cycled k-covered wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 12, 4 (2016).
[4]
H. M. Ammari and S. K. Das. 2009. Critical density for coverage and connectivity in three-dimensional wireless sensor networks using continuum percolation. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 20, 6 (2009), 872–885.
[5]
H. M. Ammari and S. K. Das. 2009. Fault tolerance measures for large-scale wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 4, 1 (2009).
[6]
H. M. Ammari and S. K. Das. 2010. A study of k-coverage and measures of connectivity in 3D wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 59, 2 (2010), 243–257.
[7]
H. M. Ammari and S. K. Das. 2012. Centralized and clustered k-coverage protocols for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 61, 1 (2012), 118–133.
[8]
Ch. Anagnostopoulos, S. Hadjiefthymiades, and K. Kolomvatsos. 2016. Accurate, dynamic, and distributed localization of phenomena for mobile sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 12, 2 (2016).
[9]
B. Bhattacharya, M. Burmester, Y. Hu, E. Kranakis, Q. Shi, and A. Wiese. 2009. Optimal movement of mobile sensors for barrier coverage of a planar region. Theor. Comput. Sci. 410, 52 (2009), 5515–5528.
[10]
A Boukerche and P. Sun. 2018. Connectivity and coverage based protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 80 (2018), 54–69.
[11]
H. Cai, X. Jia, and M. Sha. 2011. Critical sensor density for partial connectivity in large area wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 7, 4 (Feb. 2011).
[12]
J. Czyzowicz, E. Kranakis, D. Krizanc, L. Narayanan, and J. Opatrny. 2020. Optimal online and offline algorithms for robot-assisted restoration of barrier coverage. Discr. Appl. Math. 285 (2020), 650–662.
[13]
S. Dasgupta, G. Mao, and B. Anderson. 2015. A new measure of wireless network connectivity. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 14, 9 (2015), 1765–1779.
[14]
I. Dietrich and F. Dressler. 2009. On the lifetime of wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 5, 1 (2009).
[15]
S. Dobrev, E. Kranakis, D. Krizanc, M. Lafond, J. Maňuch, L. Narayanan, J. Opatrny, S. Shende, and L. Stacho. 2020. Weak coverage of a rectangular barrier. Algorithmica 82 (2020), 721–746.
[16]
B. Doerr. 2018. An elementary analysis of the probability that a binomial random variable exceeds its expectation. Stat. Probab. Lett. 139 (2018), 67–74.
[17]
R. Elhabyan, W. Shi, and M. St-Hilaire. 2019. Coverage protocols for wireless sensor networks: Review and future directions. J. Commun. Netw. 21, 1 (2019), 45–60.
[18]
A. Eslami, M. Nekoui, H. Pishro-Nik, and F. Fekri. 2013. Results on finite wireless sensor networks: Connectivity and coverage. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 9, 4 (Jul. 2013).
[19]
P. Frasca, F. Garin, B. Gerencsér, and Hendrickx J. M.2015. Optimal one-dimensional coverage by unreliable sensors. SIAM J. Contr. Optimiz. 53, 5 (2015), 3120–3140.
[20]
M. Fuchs, L. Kao, and W. Wu. 2020. On binomial and poisson sums arising from the displacement of randomly placed sensors. Taiwan. J. Math. 24, 6 (2020), 1353–1382.
[21]
X. Gao, Z. Chen, F. Wu, and G. Chen. 2017. Energy efficient algorithms for k -sink minimum movement target coverage problem in mobile sensor network. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 25, 6 (2017), 3616–3627.
[22]
X. Gao, J. Fan, F. Wu, and G. Chen. 2018. Approximation algorithms for sweep coverage problem with multiple mobile sensors. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 26, 2 (2018), 990–1003.
[23]
X. Gao, J. Fan, F. Wu, and G. Chen. 2020. Cooperative sweep coverage problem with mobile sensors. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. (2020), 1–1.
[24]
A. Ghosh, A. Chattopadhyay, A. Arora, and A. Kumar. 2017. Measurement based as-you-go deployment of two-connected wireless relay networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 13, 3 (2017).
[25]
A. Ghosh and S. K. Das. 2008. Coverage and connectivity issues in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Perv. Mobile Comput. 4 (2008), 303–334.
[26]
R. Graham, D. Knuth, and O. Patashnik. 1994. Concrete Mathematics A Foundation for Computer Science. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
[27]
H. P. Gupta, S. V. Rao, and T. Venkatesh. 2016. Analysis of stochastic coverage and connectivity in three-dimensional heterogeneous directional wireless sensor networks. Perv. Mobile Comput. 29 (2016), 38–56.
[28]
S. Guruacharya, H. Tabassum, and E. Hossain. 2016. Integral approximations for coverage probability. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. 5, 1 (2016), 24–27.
[29]
J. He and H. Shi. 2012. Constructing sensor barriers with minimum cost in wireless sensor networks. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 72, 12 (2012), 1654–1663.
[30]
P. Hoyingcharoen and W. Teerapabkajorndet. 2019. Expected probabilistic detection and sink connectivity in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens. J. 19, 12 (2019), 4480–4493.
[31]
R. Kan and C. Robotti. 2017. On moments of folded and truncated multivariate normal distributions. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 26, 4 (2017), 930–934.
[32]
R. Kapelko. 2018. On the moment distance of poisson processes. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 47, 24 (2018), 6052–6063.
[33]
R. Kapelko. 2018. On the maximum movement of random sensors for coverage and interference on a line. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking. ACM, 36:1–36:10.
[34]
R. Kapelko. 2018. On the maximum movement to the power of random sensors for coverage and interference. Perv. Mobile Comput. 51 (2018), 174–192.
[35]
R. Kapelko. 2018. On the moments of absolute difference between random processes with application to sensor network. IEEE Sens. Lett. 2, 4 (Dec. 2018), 1–4.
[36]
R. Kapelko. 2019. Asymptotic formula for sum of moment mean deviation for order statistics from uniform distribution. Discr. Math. Algor. Appl. 11 (Apr. 2019), 1–23.
[37]
R. Kapelko. 2020. On the energy in displacement of random sensors for interference and connectivity. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking. ACM, 1–10.
[38]
R. Kapelko and E. Kranakis. 2016. On the displacement for covering a d-dimensional cube with randomly placed sensors. Ad Hoc Netw. 40 (2016), 37–45.
[39]
R. Kapelko and E. Kranakis. 2016. On the displacement for covering a unit interval with randomly placed sensors. Inform. Process. Lett. 116 (2016), 710–717.
[40]
H. Kim, H. Oh, P. Bellavista, and J. Ben-Othman. 2017. Constructing event-driven partial barriers with resilience in wireless mobile sensor networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 82 (2017), 77–92.
[41]
E. Kranakis. 2014. On the event distance of poisson processes with applications to sensors. Discr. Appl. Math. 179 (2014), 152–162.
[42]
S. Kumar, T. H. Lai, and A. Arora. 2007. Barrier coverage with wireless sensors. Wireless Netw. 13, 6 (Dec. 2007), 817–834.
[43]
F. Li, J Luo, S. Xin, and Y. He. 2016. Autonomous deployment of wireless sensor networks for optimal coverage with directional sensing model. Comput. Netw. 108 (2016), 120–132.
[44]
H. Li and H. Zhang. 2020. On the edge-connectivity of an uncertain random graph. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 59126–59134.
[45]
M. Mitzenmacher and E. Upfal. 2005. Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
[46]
S. M. Mohamed, H. S. Hamza, and I. A. Saroit. 2017. Coverage in mobile wireless sensor networks (M-WSN): A survey. Comput. Commun. 110 (2017), 133–150.
[47]
S. M. Ross. 2002. Probability Models for Computer Science. Academic Press.
[48]
A. Saeed, A. Abdelkader, M. Khan, A. Neishaboori, K. A. Harras, and A. Mohamed. 2019. On realistic target coverage by autonomous drones. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 15, 3 (2019).
[49]
A. Saipulla, C. Westphal, B. Liu, and J. Wang. 2009. Barrier coverage of line-based deployed wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’09). IEEE, 127–135.
[50]
S. Sastry, T. Radeva, J. Chen, and J. Welch. 2013. Reliable networks with unreliable sensors. Perv. Mobile Comput. 9, 2 (2013), 311–323.
[51]
S. Shakkottai, R. Srikant, and N. Shroff. 2005. Unreliable sensor grids: coverage, connectivity and diameter. Ad Hoc Netw. 3, 6 (2005), 702–716.
[52]
T. Shi, S. Cheng, J. Li, H. Gao, and Z. Cai. 2019. Dominating sets construction in rf-based battery-free sensor networks with full coverage guarantee. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 15, 4 (2019).
[53]
Ch. Song, L. Liu, G. Feng, Y. Fan, and Sh. Xu. 2020. Coverage control for heterogeneous mobile sensor networks with bounded position measurement errors. Automatica 120 (2020), 109118.
[54]
J. Svante. 1988. Some pairwise independent sequences for which the central limit theorem fails. Stochastics 23, 4 (1988), 439–448.
[55]
J. Tian, X. Liang, and G. Wang. 2016. Deployment and reallocation in mobile survivability-heterogeneous wireless sensor networks for barrier coverage. Ad Hoc Netw. 36 (2016), 321–331.
[56]
N. G. Ushakov. 2011. Some inequalities for absolute moments. Stat. Probab. Lett. 81, 12 (2011), 2011–2015.
[57]
W. Wu, Z. Zhang, W. Lee, and D. Du. 2020. Optimal Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks. Springer, Cham.
[58]
G. Xing, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, Ch. Lu, R. Pless, and Ch. Gill. 2005. Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration for energy conservation in sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 1, 1 (2005), 36–72.
[59]
M. Younis and K. Akkaya. 2008. Strategies and techniques for node placement in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Ad Hoc Netw. 6, 4 (2008), 621–655.
[60]
J. Yu, S. Wan, X. Cheng, and D. Yu. 2017. Coverage contribution area based k -coverage for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. 66, 9 (2017), 8510–8523.
[61]
Ch. Zhou, A. Mazumder, A. Das, K. Basu, N. Matin-Moghaddam, S. Mehrani, and A. Sen. 2019. Relay node placement under budget constraint. Perv. Mobile Comput. 53 (2019), 1–12.
[62]
Z. Zhou, S. R. Das, and H. Gupta. 2009. Variable radii connected sensor cover in sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 5, 1 (Feb. 2009).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Linear Programming Models for the Design of Energy-Efficient IoT Networks With Transmission ConstraintsIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking10.1109/TGCN.2023.33058108:1(391-401)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024) Optimizing -coverage in energy-saving wireless sensor networks based on the Elite Global Growth Optimizer Expert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124878256(124878)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2023)On Wireless Sensor Network Models: A Cross-Layer Systematic ReviewJournal of Sensor and Actuator Networks10.3390/jsan1204005012:4(50)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 17, Issue 4
November 2021
403 pages
ISSN:1550-4859
EISSN:1550-4867
DOI:10.1145/3472298
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Journal Family

Publication History

Published: 10 August 2021
Accepted: 01 March 2021
Revised: 01 October 2020
Received: 01 May 2020
Published in TOSN Volume 17, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Sensors
  2. coverage
  3. random process
  4. time
  5. energy

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • NSF
  • Polish National Science Center (NCN)

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)290
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)36
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Linear Programming Models for the Design of Energy-Efficient IoT Networks With Transmission ConstraintsIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking10.1109/TGCN.2023.33058108:1(391-401)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024) Optimizing -coverage in energy-saving wireless sensor networks based on the Elite Global Growth Optimizer Expert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124878256(124878)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2023)On Wireless Sensor Network Models: A Cross-Layer Systematic ReviewJournal of Sensor and Actuator Networks10.3390/jsan1204005012:4(50)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Distributed Node Deployment Algorithms in Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks: Survey and ChallengesACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/357903419:4(1-26)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Energy-efficient Data Aggregation in Low-power Wireless Networks with Sensors of Discrete Transmission Ranges: A Mathematical Framework for Network DesignIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering10.1109/TNSE.2023.3274693(1-12)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)The Wireless Sensor Network Communication Coverage2023 2nd International Conference on Futuristic Technologies (INCOFT)10.1109/INCOFT60753.2023.10424989(1-7)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Energy-efficient Data Aggregation Schemes for Low-power Distributed Wireless Sensor Networks using Compressed Sensing2023 International Conference on Control, Communication and Computing (ICCC)10.1109/ICCC57789.2023.10165342(1-6)Online publication date: 19-May-2023
  • (2022)Connectivity Analysis of WSN Nodes using Neighborhood Search Technique (WSNNST)International Journal of Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing10.46300/9106.2022.16.12116(993-998)Online publication date: 30-May-2022
  • (2022)Analysis of the Threshold for Energy Consumption in Displacement of Random SensorsSensors10.3390/s2222878922:22(8789)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2022
  • (2022)An Analytical Model of Multi-intrusion Detection for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks Applied in the Monitoring AreaInternational Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control10.2174/221032791266622061012333012:5(369-378)Online publication date: Jun-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media