はてなキーワード: JOURNEYとは
First dates can be exciting and nerve-wracking all at once. You’re meeting someone new, learning about their interests, and trying to figure out if there’s chemistry between you. And then there’s flirting, that delicate dance of showing someone you’re interested without being too forward or awkward.
Flirting doesn’t have to be a high-pressure situation. In fact, it can be the most fun part of getting to know someone. Whether you're meeting someone on MixerDates or any other platform, the most important thing is to be genuine, stay calm, and let the connection develop naturally.
If you’ve ever found yourself wondering how to flirt on a first date without feeling uncomfortable, you’re not alone. Everyone has their awkward moments, but the more you understand the art of flirting, the easier it becomes. In this article, we’ll break down how to flirt in a way that feels natural, exciting, and authentic to who you are. So, let's dive in and learn how to make the most of your first date experience—without overthinking it.
When it comes to flirting, confidence is key. But what does it really mean to be confident on a first date? Confidence doesn’t mean you need to be perfect, or even outgoing—it simply means being comfortable in your own skin and showing up as your authentic self.
Have you ever noticed how people are drawn to those who radiate self-assurance? It’s not about bragging or dominating the conversation—it’s about presenting yourself with ease. If you feel good about yourself, it will naturally show. A great smile, good posture, and eye contact can go a long way in making a good first impression.
For instance, think about the last time someone walked into a room and immediately caught your attention—not because they were the most attractive person in the room, but because of their energy. They were confident, they were present, and they made you feel at ease. That’s the kind of confidence you want to project on your date.
When you're confident, you're not worried about saying the perfect thing. Instead, you focus on enjoying the moment, making the other person feel comfortable, and letting the connection happen naturally. That’s the magic of confidence—it allows you to be present, fun, and, most importantly, yourself.
Let’s face it—no one wants to feel like they’re being “worked” or put through a game. That’s why subtlety is such a powerful tool when it comes to flirting. It's all about showing interest without being over-the-top or too obvious.
Flirting doesn’t always mean complimenting someone non-stop or using cheesy pickup lines. In fact, the most successful flirting is the kind that happens behind the scenes—subtle, playful, and lighthearted. Think about the little moments, like a teasing comment about how they always order the same thing at a restaurant or the way you laugh at a silly joke they make.
The key is to find a balance. A simple smile or a playful comment can convey interest without being too much. For example, if your date tells you they love hiking but they tend to get lost easily, you could say something like, “So, you’re telling me you need a personal guide? I could get behind that!” It’s lighthearted, humorous, and most importantly, it keeps the conversation fun without putting too much pressure on the situation.
By keeping it subtle, you allow your date to feel at ease. It takes the pressure off them to be perfect and allows both of you to enjoy the interaction more naturally. Flirting doesn’t need to be a performance—it’s about creating an environment where both of you can feel comfortable and authentic.
Now, let’s talk about something incredibly important in the flirting game: active listening. When we’re on a date, we often get caught up in thinking about what to say next, how we’re coming across, or if we’re being interesting enough. But the best way to make an impression? Truly listening to your date.
Active listening means you’re fully engaged in the conversation, giving your date your full attention and responding thoughtfully. It’s about showing that you care about what they’re saying and that you’re genuinely interested in getting to know them better. When you listen actively, you’re also giving them space to open up, and that can create an immediate connection.
For example, if your date mentions they recently traveled to Japan, instead of simply saying, “That’s cool!” you could follow up with something like, “What was the most memorable experience you had there?” This shows that you’re not just hearing their words but are genuinely curious and invested in their experiences. It’s a great way to build rapport and let them know you’re not just there to impress them—you’re there to connect.
While your words are important, body language often speaks louder than anything you can say. Whether you realize it or not, your body is constantly communicating how you feel. How you sit, stand, and move tells your date whether you’re relaxed, engaged, or distracted.
Small gestures can go a long way in flirting. A light touch on the arm, a subtle lean in when they’re speaking, or maintaining good eye contact—all these body language cues help signal your interest. And the great thing is, when done naturally, these cues can be just as effective as words.
For example, if you’re sitting at a café on your date and you lean in slightly when they’re sharing a funny story, you’re not just showing that you’re interested—you’re inviting them into your space. It’s an invitation to connect further. And when they respond by leaning in too, that’s when the magic happens—the unspoken connection that tells you both that there’s potential for more.
Flirting through body language doesn’t mean making grand gestures or being overly touchy. It’s about being present and showing that you’re engaged with your date in a subtle, but meaningful way.
It’s easy to get caught up in overthinking how to flirt or trying to figure out if your date is into you. But here’s a secret—when you let go of the pressure and allow yourself to have fun, everything flows much more naturally. Flirting on a first date doesn’t need to feel like a test or an assignment. It’s supposed to be a fun, lighthearted experience that sets the stage for more great dates ahead.
When was the last time you had a genuinely fun date? Was it when you were trying too hard to impress, or when you were both laughing, chatting, and enjoying each other's company? Flirting becomes effortless when you're present, enjoying the moment, and letting the connection grow naturally.
Sometimes, it's the small moments—like sharing a laugh or swapping embarrassing stories—that make a first date truly special. When you focus on having fun, you create an environment where both of you can relax, flirt, and let the chemistry grow. That’s the secret to a great date.
One of the best things about using a platform like MixerDates is that it takes the guesswork out of the equation. By connecting with someone who already shares your interests and values, you’ve got a head start on making a real connection. No more swiping through countless profiles hoping for a spark—on MixerDates, you already know there’s something in common.
When you’re already on the same page with your date, flirting comes more easily. There’s less of that awkward, “Are we even on the same wavelength?” feeling, and more of the fun, “Wow, we really click!” vibe. Whether you’re talking about favorite hobbies, movies, or life goals, the conversation flows naturally, making the flirting feel effortless.
If you're looking for a place to meet like-minded people and build genuine connections, MixerDates is the perfect platform. It's a great place to find someone who appreciates you for who you are and who you can naturally flirt with, without the stress.
Flirting on a first date is all about confidence, connection, and fun. When you let go of the pressure and focus on enjoying the experience, the chemistry will naturally follow. Remember, the best way to flirt is by being yourself—let your personality shine through, listen with intention, and embrace the moment.
And if you’re ready to meet someone new, who’s just as interested in making a connection as you are, MixerDates is the perfect place to start. So go ahead, take the leap, and see where it leads. Who knows? Your next great connection might be just a click away.
Sign up for MixerDates today and start your journey to exciting first dates and meaningful connections!
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
NCSOFTから「Journey of Monarch - 君主の道ってゲームが出たでー遊んでくれやでー」ってメールが来たから
一応どんなもんか公式開いてみたんすわ
なーんも分からん、とにかく公式は一見AAAタイトルと見紛う映像美でトレーラーを流してくる
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drX4s3RO92A
中身は一切伝わってこないのが潔いくらいPV詐欺ゲー感を醸し出してる
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkJznn04-NQ
リネージュの後継作で一応MMOらしいんだが、見下ろし型の放置RPGだな
自軍の数キャラと相手のボスで棒立ち殴り合いをする放置バトルを繰り返すだけに見える
はー、フォトリアル調ってのはゴミを一見まともなもんに見せかけるのに本当便利だな
日本人でやる人おらんやろ…いや韓国人も欧米人もまずやらんかな
もはやリネージュシリーズのファンにすら唾吐くような出来といっても過言
NCSOFT大丈夫なのか
ライバルだったNEXONはブルーアーカイブやらThe First Descendantやら時代に即したヒット作を出せているのに
JOURNEYは曲が良いのはもちろんだけど、色んなフェードアウトのパターンがあるのでいくつか紹介。
Don't Stop Believin'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k8craCGpgs
JOURNEYで一番有名のなこの曲はサビが一番ラストに来るという構成で、そのサビを繰り返しながらにフェードアウト。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEpFf2towVU
この曲は逆にサビから始まってサビでフェードアウトという構成。
Be Good to Yourself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhsRulRxCas
JOURNEYのリーダーと言えば名ギタリストのニール・ショーンということで、特にロックチューンはギターソロでフェードアウトしていくパターンも。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EX-_WkUxyLU
バラードでラストに泣きのギターをかき鳴らしながらフェードアウトするパターンもあり、ギターソロをもっと聞かせてほしいというところでフェードアウト。
Stone in Love
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fKOzeUBIMI
これはニール・ショーンがギターソロを聞かせつつ、スティーブ・ペリーがサビの一節のコーラスで入れつつフェードアウト。
Wheel in the Sky
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dag_t8W-71w
このアルバムで脱退したドラマーのエインズレー・ダンバーのカッコいいプレイをフィーチャーして、まだまだ曲が続きそうなところでフェードアウト。
Why Can't This Night Go On Forever
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9vuGWjAIzQ
スティーブ・ペリーの熱唱、ニール・ショーンの泣きのギターソロで盛り上がった後、ジョナサン・ケインの印象的なピアノがリフレインしつつフェードアウト。
ちなみにこんなに色んなパターンのフェードアウト曲を作ったJOURNEYだけど、90年代以降のアルバムではフェードアウトで終わる曲がかなり少なくなるので、音楽にも流行り廃りはあるなと思いました。
ここでいう「そのまま」とは、例えば「呪術廻戦」→「Jujutsu Kaisen」といったものを指す。
日本語タイトル | 英語タイトル | 所感 |
名探偵コナン | Case Closed | 全然ピンとこない |
覚悟のススメ | Apocalypse Zero | 全然ピンとこない |
こちら葛飾区亀有公園前派出所 | KochiKame: Tokyo Beat Cops | 下町要素どこいった |
鬼滅の刃 | Demon Slayer:Kimetsu no Yaiba | 鬼滅感どこいった |
侵略!イカ娘 | Squid Girl | 侵略要素どこいった |
行け!稲中卓球部 | The Ping Pong Club | 稲中要素どこいった |
Re:ゼロから始める異世界生活 | Re:Zero -Starting Life in Another World | 日本語版副題どこいった |
五等分の花嫁 | The Quintessential Quintuplets | 花嫁要素どこいった、だが響きは良い |
古見さんは、コミュ症です。 | Komi Can't Communicate | なんか響きが良い |
ヤンキー君とメガネちゃん | Flunk Punk Rumble | なんか響きが良い |
地獄先生ぬ〜べ〜 | Hell Teacher: Jigoku Sensei Nube | なんか響きが良い |
食戟のソーマ | Food Wars!: Shokugeki no Soma | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
北斗の拳 | Fist of the North Star | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
浦安鉄筋家族 | Super Radical Gag Family | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
私がモテないのはどう考えてもお前らが悪い! | No Matter How I Look at It, It's You Guys' Fault I'm Not Popular! | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
銀魂 | Gintama | これだとジンタマではないのか |
ゲゲゲの鬼太郎 | GeGeGe no Kitarō | これだとじぇじぇじぇではないのか |
魔法先生ネギま! | Negima! Magister Negi Magi | ギはどこから出てきた |
魔入りました!入間くん | Welcome to Demon School! Iruma-kun | 英訳不可能なのでしゃあない |
・Re:ゼロから始める異世界生活について、ロゴに記載の英語タイトルは「Re:Life in a different world from zero」に対し、英語タイトルは「Starting Life in Another World」と結構違う。
・葬送のフリーレンの英題「『Frieren: Beyond Journey's End」は、旅の終わりと仲間の喪失の意味がかかっていて良いと思った。
・るろうに剣心の英題「Samurai X」は知っていたのだが、調べた範囲ではどうもアニメのタイトルのようであるので入れてない。
https://uo.com/ultima-online-new-legacy/
MMORPG の元祖にして最高峰 Ultima Online に27年目にして新ルールセットの新シャード New Legacy が 2024/10/15 にリリースされたのに日本ではいっさい話題になってなくて悲しい。
ClassicUO というサードパーティークライアントが公式認定され、WebAssembly でなんと Web ブラウザだけで UO 2D が動く。
3DクライアントのようなコンテナやUOAにあったような便利機能が標準搭載。
そんなことより人がいっぱいのブリタニアを懐かしの音楽とともに駆け巡るのがすごい楽しい。
残念ながら New Legacy シャードがあるのがアメリカなのでラグがひどく、言語も英語のみ。 UO がでた当時アメリカのシャードしかなかった頃 Catskills でラグでバウンスしながら、拙い英語で遊んでいた時代を思い出す。まだ始まったばかりなので新ルールセットがどんなものなのか、今後のシナリオもみんな手探り。PK はないのかな?PvP はあるらしい。
1. プログラムの夢 - Wataru's Dream of Code
2. ループの迷宮 - Labyrinth of Loops
3. 変数の秘密 - Secrets of the Variables
4. 条件分岐の試練 - Trials of the If-Else
5. デバッグの夜明け - Dawn of Debugging
6. サブルーチンの冒険 - Adventures in Subroutines
7. レガシーコードの呪い - Curse of the Legacy Code
8. リファクタリングの旅 - Journey of Refactoring
9. アルゴリズムの競演 - Symphony of Algorithms
10. クラウドの彼方に - Beyond the Clouds
In today’s competitive academic landscape, producing high-quality essays is crucial for success, particularly in business studies. Business essay writers specialize in crafting compelling and well-researched papers that meet the rigorous standards of academic institutions. These professionals possess a deep understanding of various business concepts, including marketing, finance, management, and entrepreneurship, enabling them to deliver tailored content that aligns with specific course requirements.
One of the primary advantages of hiring a business essay writer is their expertise in research and analysis. They can sift through vast amounts of information, extracting relevant data and presenting it in a coherent and engaging manner. This not only saves students valuable time but also enhances the overall quality of their work, resulting in better grades.
Moreover, business essay writers are adept at adhering to various citation styles, ensuring that your work is plagiarism-free and properly referenced. This is essential in academia, where originality and credibility are paramount.
In addition to helping students meet deadlines, these writers can also provide valuable insights and feedback, allowing students to learn and improve their writing skills. Whether you need help with a complex case study or a persuasive argumentative essay, a business essay writer can be a valuable resource in your academic journey.
Investing in a professional writing service not only alleviates stress but also enhances your understanding of business principles, ultimately contributing to your educational and career success. Don’t hesitate to seek out expert assistance to elevate your academic performance in the business field.
Visit us:- https://studyprofy.com/business-essay-writing-service/
ポケットモンスター赤緑のソロプレイに注目が集まっているRiJだが、もう一つの見所が、今何が起こっていて、何が超絶技巧なのかを視聴者に教えてくれる解説である。
現在、YouTubeに上がっているものの中から、「クリアまで1時間以内」「解説が面白さを引き立てている」という視点でピックアップした。
なお、これからアップされるものの中でも、紹介したいもの(例えば、「wallprime」など)があるので、できれば追記したい。
(トラバの助言を受けて、YouTubeからtwitchのリンクに変更した。コメントから当時の臨場感が伝わってくると思う。一方、YouTubeの方は走者さんや解説さんがコメントを書いていることもあるし、視聴者もコメントを残せるので、こちらも見てほしい)
(追記:速報版の6つに、ラストまでの4つを加えて完成。リンクとして張れるのは9本までのようなので、1本は頭を削った)
RITE
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2221332904
走者兼解説。
フレーム単位で9段階のジャンプを使い分け、精密な十字キー操作を行いながら、淡々と各面のポイントを述べていく解説がクール。
Lonely Mountains: Downhill
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2221428977
キャラが死ぬたびに、こらえきれずに吹き出す解説さんにつられ、会場も爆笑につぐ爆笑。
人が死んでんねんで!
SkateBIRD
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2222178941
解説さんがいなければ、プレイの意味が全く分からなかったゲーム。
序盤の「モンチ、モンチモンチモンチスクリームモンチモンチモンチ!!」はぜひ聞いてほしい。
ソロモンの鍵
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2222216364
超絶テクニックを「うまいー」「はいうまいー」「うまいねー」と妙なテンションで流すのがシュール。
「次の面は癒やし」からの仕事猫案件、グダるけれど、グダった後のトークも面白い。
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2222276074
一方で、すぐにダウンするためコンボを決めさせてくれない敵に「勝手に倒れてどうするんだ!RTAだぞお前!」と説教したりとやりたい放題。
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2223151102
時に無茶ぶりをし、時に圧をかけるのもたまらない。
「世界記録って、速いですからね」は今大会で1、2を争う名言。
(追記)
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2223819722
走者兼解説。ギリギリのシチュエーションを率直に言語化してくれるので、自分がプレイしているような気分になる。
「(天井から石が降ってきて)あっヤバ(瞬間に生存ルートを見つけて)くない…。ヤバくないですよ」と強がるのも面白い。
wallprime
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2223820910
壁に表示された4桁までの数字を、ひたすら素因数分解していくゲーム。
走者の頭はどうかしているとしか思えない超速「素数パンチ」に加え、
解説さんの「どうやって素因数分解をしているのか…ですが、基本は覚えます(7割は覚えている)」との発言が加わり、
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2223897031
プレイ時間のうち3分の2ぐらいは、ただ待つだけなのだが、そこを解説に定評あるワイズさんが、
ゲームプレイや、ゲーム周りの情報だけでなく、人間批評、社会批評も含めて解説していく。
tps://www.twitch.tv/videos/2224602471
正確にレゴブロックを組み上げていく走者と、それに合わせてよどみなくストーリーを展開していく解説さんのタッグ。
RTAと知らなければ、Eテレの番組かな?と思うほどの完成度。
さて、最後になるが、実は当初(大会が終了する前)、10本を紹介するつもりであり、10本目はスーパーマリオ64目隠しプレイで締めるつもりでいた。
走者のBubziaさんは、昨年夏のRiJに目隠しゼルダBotWの目隠しプレイを披露し、目隠しときメモとともに社会(の一部)を震撼させたので、覚えている方も多いだろう。
スーパーマリオ64でも、RiJ 2021 Winterで目隠し・スター70枚というレギュレーションを走りきっており、解説はそのときと同じ宇佐見まさむねさん。
Bubziaさんにとって、とても納得のいくプレイではないことは明らかであり、おすすめに挙げることは躊躇せざるを得なかった。
しかし、宇佐見さんの、走者の操作だけでなく心情とも完全に同期し、Bubziaさんが失敗した場面で、各トライアルの何が失敗の要因かを正確に言語化した解説は、
個人的にはある種の美しさを感じた。
おすすめはできないが、一度見てほしいとも思う。
ホロEN一期生として、衝撃的なデビューを果たしたラッパー。キャラは死神。
カリオペがデビューした2020年当時は、今から振り返るとまだVTuberの創世記と言っていいんじゃないかと思います。
実際に服役してた個人勢の「懲役太郎」さんとかエッジの効いたVTuberはいたんですが所詮アングラで、「死神」というキャラ設定でデビューしたホロEN一期生が、デビュー配信でいきなりプロレベル(に聞こえた)のオリジナルラップ曲をリリースした衝撃はものすごく大きかった気がする。
ラップのリリックを含む作詞と、イラストも描ける多才な人。日本語もかなりうまくなった気がする。
ホロEN三期生「Advent」所属。キャラは「音の魔神」。ホロも期を重ねて、世界観がややコアになってきた気がする。
EN三期はデビュー後たったの2ヶ月でJP7期相当(7期ではない)の「ReGLOSS」がデビューしたこともあり、ホロには珍しいデビュー続きとなってしまい、その点でやや不遇感があるかも。
EN三期ともなると色々なホロメンの中でデビューしただけあり、ネリッサは一聴して歌がものすごく上手いと思います。
喋りは英語なのでちょっとしかわかりませんが、歌全振り系のおもしろお姉さんっぽいw
VTuberの事務所はにじさんじとホロライブの圧倒的な二強で、他はすべて相当な差で後塵を拝していると思われます。
その中では歌に絞ることで比較的上位にいた?と思われるRe:ACT所属のV。
(現在ではぶいすぽっ!とかのが勢いあると思う)
「歌手志望の子を騙して連れてきたんじゃないか?」(ド失礼)と思ってしまうくらいいい曲歌います。
作詞作曲が出来て歌えるということで、シンガーソングライターに近いと思われます。
地道に数年頑張ってて、たまーに見てる。
最近…でもないけどホロライブの「Blue Journey」という音楽プロジェクトに「あの日の僕らへ」という楽曲を提供した(作詞作曲)。
深遠なミニマリストの箴言を英語で検索し、以下の10個を選びました:
1. 「Less is more.」 - 物を少なくすることで、その価値が増す。
2. 「Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.」- シンプルさこそが最高の洗練である。
3. 「The secret of happiness, you see, is not found in seeking more, but in developing the capacity to enjoy less.」 - 幸せの秘訣は、より多くを求めるのではなく、より少ないものを楽しむ能力を育てることにある。
4. 「It is not the man who has too little, but the man who craves more, that is poor.」 - 貧しいのは、物が少ない人ではなく、より多くを欲しがる人である。
5. 「The ability to simplify means to eliminate the unnecessary so that the necessary may speak.」 - シンプルにする能力とは、必要なものが語れるように不必要なものを排除することである。
6. 「Have nothing in your houses that you do not know to be useful or believe to be beautiful.」 - 自分の家には、役立つと知っているか、美しいと信じているものだけを持つべきである。
7. 「He who knows he has enough is rich.」 - 自分が十分に持っていると知っている人こそが富んでいる。
8. 「Simplicity is making the journey of this life with just baggage enough.」 - シンプルさとは、この人生の旅をちょうど十分な荷物で進むことである。
9. 「The more you have, the more you are occupied. The less you have, the more free you are.」 - 持っているものが多ければ多いほど、忙しくなる。持っているものが少なければ少ないほど、自由になる。
10. 「The simplest things are often the truest.」 - 最もシンプルなものほど、よく真実を表している。
ここ1年で初めてはてなブックマーク日毎の総合人気エントリ入りしたドメインからのホットエントリ、ブクマ数順トップ30
ブクマ数 | タイトル | ドメイン |
---|---|---|
1900 | なんとなく使っていませんか? 括弧の種類と使い分け|モリサワ note編集部 | note.morisawa.co.jp |
1309 | 波 2024年4月号 おつむの良い子は長居しない 第12回/高嶋政伸 | www.shinchosha.co.jp |
1241 | 電車の中で座るための戦略とアクションプラン|みずほリサーチ&テクノロジーズ | www.mizuho-rt.co.jp |
1061 | 無印良品のランドセルの思い出 - プロムナード | promenade.hatenablog.jp |
1011 | 謙虚なリーダーのもとで心理的安全性が高まりメンバーが本領発揮しやすくなる―職場においてリーダーの謙虚さと心理的安全性が果たす役割― | 東京大学 先端科学技術研究センター | www.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp |
986 | いらすと本舗 | irasutofree.com |
921 | 電通、人間の消費行動に強く影響する「11の欲望」最新版を発表 | AdverTimes.(アドタイ) by 宣伝会議 | www.advertimes.com |
918 | 訃報|集英社『週刊少年ジャンプ』公式サイト | www.shonenjump.com |
808 | 日本の賃金が上がらない理由(大企業の中の人目線で) - konanタワリーマンブログ | konantower.hatenablog.com |
730 | はじめに | ちいさな Web ブラウザを作ってみよう | browserbook.shift-js.info |
680 | あなたが教わってるそのCSSテクニックはもう古い | TAKLOG | www.tak-dcxi.com |
664 | 個人開発を7年以上続けて分かった技術選択のコツ | blog.craftz.dog |
648 | お知らせ 閉店・廃業します。 | 新宿 curry草枕 | currykusa.com |
638 | さすがの一言に尽きる!全登山者が求めていた“神アイテム”はモンベルにあった | YAMA HACK[ヤマハック] | yamahack.com |
618 | 高木浩光@自宅の日記 - Claude 3に例の「読了目安2時間」記事を解説させてみた | takagi-hiromitsu.jp |
590 | とほほさんの「お茶・紅茶入門」の内容を検証する(主に中国茶部分) – あるきちのお茶・旅行日記 | arukichi.teamedia.jp |
582 | 【翻訳】テスト駆動開発の定義 - t-wadaのブログ | t-wada.hatenablog.jp |
543 | 冬の電気自動車の遠出は本当に厳しい。航続距離も減るし、とにかく充電スピードが落ちます - 勝間和代が徹底的にマニアックな話をアップするブログ | katsumakazuyo.hatenablog.com |
540 | トーチweb 創作文芸サークル「キャロット通信」の崩壊 【創作文芸サークル「キャロット通信」の崩壊】 | to-ti.in |
539 | ワイヤレスイヤホンの価格帯別選び方 - ARTIFACT@はてブロ | kanose.hateblo.jp |
536 | 「会議で話されている内容と、ソースコードが全然違う」〜イオン発の“新ネットスーパー”リリース直前の1年間を語る|イオンネクストCTOインタビュー |AEON TECH HUB | engineer-recuruiting.aeon.info |
532 | 27歳年収420万非モテ男がマッチングアプリ始めた結果がヤバすぎる - 人生万事こじらせるべからず | www.gorannosponsor.net |
525 | Python滅ぼす協会に入会したい | dev.thanaism.com |
514 | はてなのアプリ専用マンガビューワを集英社が採用。2,700万ダウンロードを超える「少年ジャンプ+」に提供開始 - プレスリリース - 株式会社はてな | hatena.co.jp |
485 | 【無料】台湾で収録された自然環境音ライブラリ、99Sounds「Nature Sounds」無償配布開始! | Computer Music Japan | computermusic.jp |
476 | 美しいもの・美しいもの | comic-medu.com |
451 | ゲームを途中でやめた理由、ご意見&対策集 - SmokingWOLF - Ci-en(シエン) | ci-en.dlsite.com |
447 | 【シェフ考案】チキン南蛮の作り方。衣はザクザク、肉はジューシー! 甘酢、タルタルレシピも必見です | 三越伊勢丹の食メディア | FOODIE(フーディー) | mi-journey.jp |
439 | 業務スーパーのラグジュアリッチコーヒーはなぜ美味い?珈琲まめ工房を質問攻め - 福岡のフリーライター・大塚たくま.com | www.otsuka-takuma.com |
429 | 文字組版の教室 note版|モリサワ note編集部 | note.morisawa.co.jp |
もう分断を煽るのはやめませんか
現在混乱を招いている要因は、おそらく以下の二つ
AI利用に向けて改正されたとされる著作権法30条の4は AIならなんでも許されるというわけではない。以下のように条件がついている。
著作物は,次に掲げる場合その他の当該著作物に表現された思想又は感情を自ら享受し又は他人に享受させることを目的としない場合には,その必要と認められる限度において,いずれの方法によるかを問わず,利用することができる。ただし,当該著作物の種類及び用途並びに当該利用の態様に照らし著作権者の利益を不当に害することとなる場合は,この限りでない。
この辺りの解釈について紛糾している様子。
同30条の 4 は平成30年当時、事業者や研究者によるAI利用を想定していた。現在では一般市民にAIが広く普及し状況が変わってきたことから、同条の適応範囲について再整理を図るという趣旨で公開されたのが「AIと著作権に関する考え方について(素案)」
そして素案に対するパブリックコメントを募集した、というのが現在の流れ。
たぶん、CLIPのこと。テキストと画像の翻訳を行う。犬の画像を見て「犬」と識別することができる。
ネット上のあらゆる画像とテキストを学習することで作られた。OpenAIによって公開。画像生成だけではなくいろんなところに使われている。
画像生成AIはテキストエンコーダ(CLIP)と画像生成器の組み合わせでできている。stable diffusion等は拡散モデルを使っている。
1. イラストを用意する
学習を繰り返しノイズを増やしていくと最後はただのノイズから画像を出力する 連想ゲーム絵師が誕生する。連想ゲーム絵師は連想しかできないので自分が描いたものが何かわからない。犬を描いてといっても車を描いてくる。なので CLIPが誘導したりダメ出ししたりする。
どこかのイラストサイトかデータベースを使っているはず。「著作権的に安全な〜」みたいな触れ込みのやつはどこかのデータベースを購入して使っているんだと思う。
Pixivの主張は別におかしくない。このあたりは「AIと著作権に関する考え方について(素案)p7」(エ)において解説されている。"robot.txt"への記述によりAI学習を行うクローラーのアクセスを制限しているにも関わらず、勝手に学習に使うことは「データベースの著作物の潜在的販路を阻害する行為」として著作権違反になる(Pixivが将来的に本当に販売するかどうかは置いておく)
追加学習(LoRA)のこと。
既存のモデルに数枚のイラストを追加学習させることで絵柄を模倣(ファインチューニング)する。
特定の絵師さんのイラストを勝手に使う者がいるようでトラブルになっている。
絵柄に著作権はない。学習の際に行われる複製が著作権侵害にあたるかどうかが争点になっている。
著作権法30条の4 より
この辺りは「AIと著作権に関する考え方について(素案)」及びパブコメの返答に現状の解釈が示されているので興味のある方はどうぞ。
(p6. 特定のクリエイターの著作物のみを用いてファインチューニングを行う場合〜を参照)
※ここははっきりとは断定していないので自分で読んだ方が良いと思う。
(私の読解:)
程度問題ぽい。よくある画風なら問題にならないけれどはっきりと特定絵師さんとわかる感じだとダメそうですね
(私の読解終わり)
別にプロフィールなんて「トイレから出たら手を洗ってください」でも「フォローする際には五体投地してください」でも好きに書いてよいだろう。
それが法律に記されているかどうかは関係ない。ただのお願いだ。
「AI学習禁止」と書くなと騒いでいる人は何を考えているのかよくわからん。
「AIと著作権に関する考え方について(素案)」にも再三出てくるがAI学習を技術的に回避することは禁止していない。30条の4は権利の制限であって、イラストを差し出せという強制ではない。
見ればわかりますが個人よりも一般企業による意見が多く、返答とあわせてとても読み応えのあるものです。
このファイルを読んで個人の頭の悪そうな意見だけ抜粋してくるのは非常に違和感があります。
基本的に移植版であるが、新規イベントなどもある完全版と言える。
全ての始まり。
真3のときより短いスパンで出しているが、追加ディスクだけのバージョンも出すことで無印版を買ったユーザーも完全版から始めるユーザーもWin-Winの関係に。
なぜこの対応を今でもできないのかと言われる。
オリジナルから丸4年経ってることと、据置機から携帯機ということもあって移植リメイクというイメージが強い。
前作より期間は空いたが、まあ出るだろうなという感じ。
DLCが当たり前の時代なのに完全版を出す。PS3版を出さなかったことで叩かれる。
P5と同じく3年ほど空けての完全版。
これの問題は完全版ではなく、1の時点で続編があることを公表しなかったことだろう。
よく間違われるが続編である。
🎮 Want to learn about Cloud Architectures by playing a game?
AWS has newly launched "AWS Card Clash" - a 3D virtual card game that helps learners gain knowledge of cloud architectures and solution design.
You can choose one of three provided paths - Cloud Practitioner, Solutions Architect and Serverless Developer to get started with your cloud learning journey.
Challenge others in this strategic turn-based game to create the most optimal architecture design and win points.
Along with the architecture diagrams, understand how different services interact with each other in the solution.
🔗 Check out AWS Card Clash here : https://lnkd.in/g2hU5p8R
--
📥 Join my community of 8,000+ cloud learners by subscribing to the Cloudbites newsletter: https://www.cloudbites.ai/
♻️ Found this helpful? Feel free to repost & share with your network.
#cloud #cloudcomputing #aws #cardclash
As a student navigating the complexities of engineering coursework, I found myself grappling with Simulink assignments and think who will help me to complete my Simulink assignment that seemed to be from another dimension. The intricacies of Simulink, a powerful simulation and modeling tool, left me feeling overwhelmed and lost. That's when I stumbled upon a game-changer – Simulink Assignment Help from https://www.matlabassignmentexperts.com/simulink-assignment-help.html. In this testimonial blog, I want to share my transformative experience with their services, detailing how they not only helped me conquer Simulink challenges but also enhanced my overall understanding of this intricate subject.
Discovering the Simulink Assignment Help Lifeline
My journey with MatlabAssignmentExperts.com began when I was at a crossroads with my Simulink assignments. The complexities of the software, coupled with the pressure of academic deadlines, had me seeking a reliable source of assistance. A quick online search led me to their website, and the promising testimonials from fellow students who had successfully navigated Simulink assignments with their help convinced me to give it a shot.
From the very first paragraph of our interaction, it was evident that MatlabAssignmentExperts.com was different. The Simulink Assignment Help they offered was not just a transaction; it was a collaborative effort to ensure I not only completed my assignments but also understood the underlying concepts.
The Expert Guidance that Made a Difference
One of the standout features of MatlabAssignmentExperts.com is their team of experts. The individuals assigned to help me with my Simulink assignments were not just knowledgeable but also passionate about the subject. Their commitment to providing comprehensive assistance was evident in the personalized approach they took towards my assignments.
The experts patiently walked me through each step of the Simulink modeling process, explaining the rationale behind every decision. This hands-on learning experience was invaluable, as it not only resulted in impeccably solved assignments but also enhanced my proficiency in using Simulink for future projects.
Tailored Solutions for Varied Simulink Topics
Simulink is a vast field with applications in numerous engineering disciplines. What impressed me most about MatlabAssignmentExperts.com was their ability to cater to a wide array of Simulink topics. Whether it was control systems, signal processing, or model-based design, their experts exhibited a depth of knowledge that extended beyond mere problem-solving.
The assignments I brought to them were met with a comprehensive understanding of the underlying principles, leading to solutions that were not only correct but also insightful. This versatility instilled confidence in me, knowing that regardless of the Simulink topic, MatlabAssignmentExperts.com had the expertise to guide me through.
Timely Assistance in the Nick of Time
Academic deadlines are the sword of Damocles for every student. MatlabAssignmentExperts.com understands this reality and takes pride in delivering solutions within the stipulated time frames. My Simulink assignments, often accompanied by tight deadlines, were met with a prompt and efficient response from their team.
The timely assistance not only saved me from the stress of last-minute submissions but also allowed me to review the solutions thoroughly. This attention to deadlines showcased MatlabAssignmentExperts.com's commitment to the success of their clients and solidified my trust in their services.
Affordable Excellence – Breaking the Myth
The affordability of Simulink Assignment Help from MatlabAssignmentExperts.com pleasantly surprised me. There is a common misconception that quality assistance comes at a hefty price. However, this platform shattered that myth by offering top-notch services at reasonable rates.
As a student with budget constraints, the cost-effectiveness of their services allowed me to access expert guidance without burning a hole in my pocket. This accessibility to quality assistance further solidified my belief that MatlabAssignmentExperts.com is not just a service provider but a partner in academic success.
A Learning Journey, Not Just a Service
What sets MatlabAssignmentExperts.com apart is their commitment to fostering a learning experience. Simulink Assignment Help wasn't just about getting the correct answers; it was about understanding the "why" behind each step. The insights gained from their experts went beyond the immediate requirements of my assignments and translated into a broader comprehension of Simulink.
MatlabAssignmentExperts.com transformed my perception of Simulink from an intimidating subject to a tool I could wield with confidence. Their approach was not to merely complete assignments but to empower students to tackle similar challenges independently.
Conclusion – A Grateful Student's Reflection
In conclusion, my journey with Simulink Assignment Help from MatlabAssignmentExperts.com has been nothing short of transformative. From the first perplexing assignment to mastering the nuances of Simulink, their expert guidance has been the cornerstone of my academic success.
If you find yourself navigating the intricate world of Simulink assignments, I wholeheartedly recommend MatlabAssignmentExperts.com. They go beyond being a service provider – they are mentors, guides, and partners in your academic journey. With their assistance, you not only overcome immediate challenges but also equip yourself with the knowledge and skills to excel in your engineering endeavors. Trust me; your academic success with Simulink is just a click away!
As a student navigating the complexities of engineering coursework, I found myself grappling with Simulink assignments and think who will help me to complete my Simulink assignment that seemed to be from another dimension. The intricacies of Simulink, a powerful simulation and modeling tool, left me feeling overwhelmed and lost. That's when I stumbled upon a game-changer – Simulink Assignment Help from https://www.matlabassignmentexperts.com/simulink-assignment-help.html. In this testimonial blog, I want to share my transformative experience with their services, detailing how they not only helped me conquer Simulink challenges but also enhanced my overall understanding of this intricate subject.
Discovering the Simulink Assignment Help Lifeline
My journey with MatlabAssignmentExperts.com began when I was at a crossroads with my Simulink assignments. The complexities of the software, coupled with the pressure of academic deadlines, had me seeking a reliable source of assistance. A quick online search led me to their website, and the promising testimonials from fellow students who had successfully navigated Simulink assignments with their help convinced me to give it a shot.
From the very first paragraph of our interaction, it was evident that MatlabAssignmentExperts.com was different. The Simulink Assignment Help they offered was not just a transaction; it was a collaborative effort to ensure I not only completed my assignments but also understood the underlying concepts.
The Expert Guidance that Made a Difference
One of the standout features of MatlabAssignmentExperts.com is their team of experts. The individuals assigned to help me with my Simulink assignments were not just knowledgeable but also passionate about the subject. Their commitment to providing comprehensive assistance was evident in the personalized approach they took towards my assignments.
The experts patiently walked me through each step of the Simulink modeling process, explaining the rationale behind every decision. This hands-on learning experience was invaluable, as it not only resulted in impeccably solved assignments but also enhanced my proficiency in using Simulink for future projects.
Tailored Solutions for Varied Simulink Topics
Simulink is a vast field with applications in numerous engineering disciplines. What impressed me most about MatlabAssignmentExperts.com was their ability to cater to a wide array of Simulink topics. Whether it was control systems, signal processing, or model-based design, their experts exhibited a depth of knowledge that extended beyond mere problem-solving.
The assignments I brought to them were met with a comprehensive understanding of the underlying principles, leading to solutions that were not only correct but also insightful. This versatility instilled confidence in me, knowing that regardless of the Simulink topic, MatlabAssignmentExperts.com had the expertise to guide me through.
Timely Assistance in the Nick of Time
Academic deadlines are the sword of Damocles for every student. MatlabAssignmentExperts.com understands this reality and takes pride in delivering solutions within the stipulated time frames. My Simulink assignments, often accompanied by tight deadlines, were met with a prompt and efficient response from their team.
The timely assistance not only saved me from the stress of last-minute submissions but also allowed me to review the solutions thoroughly. This attention to deadlines showcased MatlabAssignmentExperts.com's commitment to the success of their clients and solidified my trust in their services.
Affordable Excellence – Breaking the Myth
The affordability of Simulink Assignment Help from MatlabAssignmentExperts.com pleasantly surprised me. There is a common misconception that quality assistance comes at a hefty price. However, this platform shattered that myth by offering top-notch services at reasonable rates.
As a student with budget constraints, the cost-effectiveness of their services allowed me to access expert guidance without burning a hole in my pocket. This accessibility to quality assistance further solidified my belief that MatlabAssignmentExperts.com is not just a service provider but a partner in academic success.
A Learning Journey, Not Just a Service
What sets MatlabAssignmentExperts.com apart is their commitment to fostering a learning experience. Simulink Assignment Help wasn't just about getting the correct answers; it was about understanding the "why" behind each step. The insights gained from their experts went beyond the immediate requirements of my assignments and translated into a broader comprehension of Simulink.
MatlabAssignmentExperts.com transformed my perception of Simulink from an intimidating subject to a tool I could wield with confidence. Their approach was not to merely complete assignments but to empower students to tackle similar challenges independently.
Conclusion – A Grateful Student's Reflection
In conclusion, my journey with Simulink Assignment Help from MatlabAssignmentExperts.com has been nothing short of transformative. From the first perplexing assignment to mastering the nuances of Simulink, their expert guidance has been the cornerstone of my academic success.
If you find yourself navigating the intricate world of Simulink assignments, I wholeheartedly recommend MatlabAssignmentExperts.com. They go beyond being a service provider – they are mentors, guides, and partners in your academic journey. With their assistance, you not only overcome immediate challenges but also equip yourself with the knowledge and skills to excel in your engineering endeavors. Trust me; your academic success with Simulink is just a click away!