Barasat Basirhat Road
Barasat Basirhat Road
Barasat Basirhat Road
ON
WIDENING & STRENGTHENING OF BARASAT
BASIRHAT ROAD (FROM 20+000 KMP TO 40+000
KMP) IN THE DISTRICT OF NORTH 24 PARGANAS
PREPARED BY
OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER
BARASAT DIVISION
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
GOVT. OF WEST BENGAL
BARASAAT P.W.D.
DIVISION
BARASAT
BASIRHAT
BASIRHAAT
BARASAT
BERACHAMPA
(KMP)
20.0
0
22.4
0
30.0
0
33.1
5
38.0
0
(KMP)
Administrative Approval
No.
Date of Completion
End of DLP
11.03.2015
10.03.2016
18.03.2014
17.03.2017
No.
22.40
27.40
33.00
36.00
40.00
Ongoing
Expected Completion
time 31/08/2016
Ongoing
Expected Completion
time 31/08/2016
Ongoing
Expected Completion
time 31/08/2016
1.0 m
Earthe
n
Should
er
iageway
3.5 m carr
3.5 m car
riageway
1.5m
paved
Should
er
1.5m
paved
Should
er
1.0 m
Earthe
n
Should
er
1
Roadway Width 12 m
depth) has been proposed for 5050 meters length (Total length
proposed for both sides)
Satellite view of
the Project Stretch
40.00 KM
Project Length
20.00 KM
Starting
Point:
Termination
point:
22o41'27.72'' N
88o40'18.53 E
22o40'2.58'' N
88o5111.78E
ALIGNMENT CURRECTION:
Proposed Radius
SL.
NO
FROM
TO
1
2
3
4
5
6
21+070
21+110
22+015
22+400
22+470
23+270
21+090
21+155
22+120
22+440
22+570
23+360
(m)
130
60
230
230
230
180
Extra width
Speed
(m.)
(KM/Hr.)
0.00
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
60
40
80
80
80
70
ALIGNMENT CURRECTION:
CHAINAGE
Proposed Radius
SL.
Extra width
Speed
(m.)
(KM/Hr.)
NO
FROM
TO
26+295
26+310
230
0.60
80
26+550
26+610
230
0.60
80
26+690
26+760
140
0.60
60
10
27+260
27+290
230
0.60
80
11
27+400
27+480
230
0.60
80
12
31+660
31+715
80
0.60
45
13
31+780
31+830
60
0.60
40
14
31+890
31+910
230
0.60
80
15
33+030
33+040
230
0.60
80
16
33+090
33+140
230
0.60
80
17
33+260
33+275
230
0.60
80
18
33+345
33+390
80
0.60
45
19
33+470
33+540
60
0.60
40
20
33+785
33+800
230
0.60
80
(m)
ALIGNMENT CURRECTION:
CHAINAGE
Proposed Radius
SL.
Extra width
Speed
(m.)
(KM/Hr.)
NO
FROM
TO
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33+885
33+395
34+095
34+630
34+790
35+795
35+860
36+180
36+375
38+620
39+520
39+555
33+905
34+405
34+105
34+640
34+810
35+805
35+870
36+190
36+385
38+630
39+530
39+575
230
230
230
230
230
230
230
230
230
230
230
230
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
33
39+630
39+650
230
0.60
80
(m)
ALIGNMENT CURRECTION:
ALIGNMENT CURRECTION:
restriction.
The chainage of such stretches and their corresponding speeds
have been furnished below:
CD SRUCTURES:
PRESENT SITUATION
APPRISAL & PROPOSAL
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
Cross Drainage structure is a vital infrastructure element of a road
network.
Maintaining
serviceability
of
CD
Structures
and
consequently retaining their level of reliability during their lifetime
therefore
deserves
high
priority
from
techno-economic
considerations. During preliminary reconnaissance survey and
Detailed Corridor Survey the inventory & condition of the existing
Cross Drainage structures were evaluated.
The existing CD structures are in poor condition and are present in
insufficient numbers. Therefore, alongwith retention, reconstruction
existing Cross Drainage structures, new C.D. structures for balancing
in the form of Double barrel (2 X 1.0 m NP-4) H.P. Culverts have
also been considered during preparation of this proposal and the
same has been put to estimate accordingly.
SH:
SH: 0.00
0.00 KMP
KMP
40.00
40.00
KMP)
KMP)
MDR:
MDR: 40.00
40.00 KMP
KMP
46.40
46.40
STRIP PLAN INDICATING EXISTING CROSS-DRAINAGE
STRUCTURES
KMP)
KMP)
24 KM
20 KM
Ch.
Ch. 22+735
22+735
m
m
H.P.
Culvert
H.P. Culvert
Dia
Dia 0.9
0.9 m
mX
X
1
1
Width
Width 10.00
10.00
m
m
27 KM
24 KM
Ch.
Ch. 22+220
22+220 m
m
Box
Culvert
Box Culvert
Span
Span 2.75
2.75 m
m
Width
9.7
m
Width 9.7 m
Ch.
24+165
Ch. 24+165
m
m
H.P.
H.P. Culvert
Culvert
Dia
Dia 0.9
0.9 m
mX
X
2
2
Width
Width 7.4
7.4 m
m
Ch.
Ch. 24+810
24+810
m
m
Slab
Slab Culvert
Culvert
Span
Span 2.5
2.5 m
m
Width
9.7
Width 9.7 m
m
Ch.
24+820
Ch. 24+820
m
m
Box
Culvert
Box Culvert
Span
Span 3.4
3.4 m
m
Width
7.4
Width 7.4 m
m
Ch.
Ch. 25+185
25+185
m
m
Slab
Slab Culvert
Culvert
Span
Span 2.1
2.1 m
m
Width
9.3
Width 9.3 m
m
Ch.
Ch. 26+390
26+390
m
m
Slab
Culvert
Slab Culvert
Span
Span 2.1
2.1 m
m
Width
Width 11.00
11.00
m
m
SH:
SH: 0.00
0.00 KMP
KMP
40.00
40.00
KMP)
KMP)
MDR:
MDR: 40.00
40.00 KMP
KMP
46.40
46.40
STRIP PLAN INDICATING EXISTING CROSS-DRAINAGE
STRUCTURES
KMP)
KMP)
Ch.
Ch. 28+290
28+290
m
m
H.P.
Culvert
H.P. Culvert
Dia
Dia 0.9
0.9 m
mX
X
2
2
Width
Width 10.00
10.00
m
m
33 KM
Ch.
Ch. 31+075
31+075
m
m
Slab
Culvert
Slab Culvert
Span
Span 4.5
4.5 m
m
Width
Width 10.4
10.4
m
m
Ch.
Ch. 33+440
33+440
m
m
Slab
Culvert
Slab Culvert
Span
Span 2.5
2.5 m
m
Width
9.9
Width 9.9 m
m
Ch.
33+730
Ch. 33+730
m
m
Slab
Culvert
Slab Culvert
Span
Span 2.5
2.5 m
m
Width
10.50
Width 10.50
m
m
Ch.
Ch. 28+425
28+425
m
m
H.P.
Culvert
H.P. Culvert
Dia
Dia 0.9
0.9 m
mX
X
2
2
Width
Width 10.00
10.00
m
m
Ch.
Ch. 28+610
28+610
m
m
Slab
Culvert
Slab Culvert
Span
Span 2.4
2.4 m
m
Width
Width 9.9
9.9 m
m
Ch.
Ch. 32+250
32+250
m
m
H.P.
H.P. Culvert
Culvert
Dia
Dia 0.9
0.9 m
mX
X
2
2
Width
Width 10.2
10.2
m
m
Ch.
Ch. 29+610
29+610
m
m
Single
Single Span
Span
Bridge
Bridge
Length
Length 25.0
25.0
m
m
Width
Width 10.00
10.00
m
m
36 KM
Ch.
Ch. 27+750
27+750
m
m
Slab
Culvert
Slab Culvert
Span
Span 2.4
2.4 m
m
Width
Width 9.5
9.5 m
m
30 KM
Ch.
Ch. 27+735
27+735
m
m
Slab
Culvert
Slab Culvert
Span
Span 3.0
3.0 m
m
Width
Width 10.00
10.00
m
m
33 KM
30 KM
27 KM
In good Condition.
Extension Proposed
Repairing and
Extension Proposed
SH:
SH: 0.00
0.00 KMP
KMP
40.00
40.00
KMP)
KMP)
MDR:
MDR: 40.00
40.00 KMP
KMP
46.40
46.40
STRIP PLAN INDICATING EXISTING CROSS-DRAINAGE
STRUCTURES
KMP)
KMP)
39 KM
36 KM
40 KM
39 KM
Ch.
36+275
Ch. 36+275
m
m
Slab
Slab Culvert
Culvert
Span
Span 3.2
3.2 m
m
Width
9.5
Width 9.5 m
m
Ch.
Ch. 39+780
39+780
m
m
H.P.
Culvert
H.P. Culvert
Dia
Dia 0.9
0.9 m
mX
X
2
2
Width
Width 9.5
9.5 m
m
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
EXISTING
Sl. No.
Chainage
Type of
Culvert
Overall
Width
(m)
PROPOSED
Span
Recommendation
(m)
22+220
Box Culvert
9.70
2.75
22+735
H.P.CULVERT
7.7
0.9 X 1
24+165
H.P.CULVERT
7.30
0.9 X 2
24+810
Slab Culvert
9.70
2.50
Type of
Culvert
In good Condition.
Extension Proposed
Choked and tilted
Replacement Proposed
Choked and tilted
Replacement Proposed
In good Condition.
Extension Proposed
Overall
Width
(m)
Box Culvert
14.50
H.P.CULVERT
(0.9 X 2)
12.50.
H.P.CULVERT
(0.9 X 2)
12.50.
Slab Culvert
14.50
Slab Culvert
12.50
24+820
Slab Culvert
7.40
3.40
Replacement Proposed
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
EXISTING
Sl. No.
Chainage
Type of
Culvert
Overall
Width
(m)
PROPOSED
Span
Recommendation
(m)
25+185
Slab Culvert
9.30
2.10
26+390
Slab Culvert
11.00
2.10
27+735
Slab Culvert
10.00
3.00
10
27+750
Slab Culvert
9.50
2.40
11
28+290
H.P.CULVERT
10.00
0.9 X 2
Culvert
In good Condition.
Extension Proposed
28+425
H.P.CULVERT
10.00
0.9 X 2
Overall
Width
(m)
Slab Culvert
14.0
Slab Culvert
14.0
Slab Culvert
12.50
H.P.CULVERT
(0.9 X 2)
15.0
H.P.CULVERT
(0.9 X 2)
15.0
In good Condition.
Retention Proposed
In good Condition.
Extension Proposed
Chocked and Tilted.
Replacement Proposed
In good Condition.
Extension Proposed
In good Condition.
12
Type of
Extension Proposed
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
EXISTING
Sl. No.
Chainage
Type of
Culvert
Overall
Width
(m)
PROPOSED
Span
Recommendation
(m)
13
28+610
Slab Culvert
9.90
2.40
14
28+685
Box Culvert
9.70
2.60
15
29+610
Bridge
10.00
25.00
160
31+075
Box Culvert
10.40
4.50
17
32+250
H.P.CULVERT
10.20
0.9 X 2
Type of
Culvert
In good Condition.
Extension Proposed
Chocked and Tilted.
Replacement Proposed
Overall
Width
(m)
Slab Culvert
14.50
Box Culvert
12.5
H.P.CULVERT
(0.9 X 2)
12.50
Slab Culvert
14.0
In good Condition.
Retention Proposed
In good Condition.
Retention Proposed
Chocked and Tilted.
Replacement Proposed
In good Condition.
18
33+440
Slab Culvert
9.90
2.50
Extension Proposed
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
EXISTING
Sl. No.
Chainage
Type of
Culvert
Overall
Width
(m)
PROPOSED
Span
Recommendation
(m)
13
33+730
Slab Culvert
10.50
2.50
14
36+275
Slab Culvert
9.50
3.20
15
39+780
H.P.CULVERT
9.51
3.07
Type of
Culvert
Overall
Width
(m)
In good Condition.
Reenion Proposed
In good Condition.
Extension Proposed
Chocked and Tilted.
Replacement Proposed
Slab Culvert
14.50
H.P.CULVERT
(0.9 X 2)
12.50
EXISTING CORRIDOR
APPRISAL
PRESENT CORRIDOR
APPRECIATION
ROAD INVENTORY:
The alignment map so produced after survey typically exhibit the key existing
Road inventory as follows
SL
.
NO
.
INVENTOR
Carriagewa
y Details
ON
FEATURES
Existing
DESCRIPTI
Shoulder
Details
Nature Of
Terrain
Carriageway
Width:
Lane type:
Carriageway
width:
Shoulder
Type:
Status of
Earthen
Shoulder:
Terrain
category
DETAILS
Uniform
Intermediate
5.5 m
Hard Shoulder
Plain
PRESENT CORRIDOR
APPRECIATION
ROAD INVENTORY:
SL
.
NO
.
INVENTOR
DESCRIPTI
ON
FEATURES
Embankme
nt Height
Heights
Varying
Heights
range:
Height at
Culverts
5
Railway
Crossing
Cross6
drainage
DETAILS
Yes/ No:
Bridge
1.Major
2. Minor
Structures
. Culverts
1.5 - 2m.
No
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
21.00
KMP
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
5.5
None
None
Exist
Exist
Exist
20.45 km
3.15
21.60 km
2.89
22.30 km
3.03
23.60 km
2.98
24.50 km
2.89
25.60 km
2.92
26.50 km
3.10
27.50 km
2.84
28.70 km
2.95
29.40 km
3.05
30.60 km
3.10
31.50 km
3.00
CHAINAGE
(KMP)
32.30 km
2.86
33.60 km
2.95
34.40 km
3.20
35.50 km
3.10
36.40 km
2.85
37.60 km
3.10
38.90 km
3.05
The 90th Percentile CBR was 3.11% and the Design CBR in this case is
considered as 3.1%.
Sub base
Mostly brickbats or
Base coarse
Mostly WBM or
Bituminous Course
Top Bituminous layer
Though
Jhama
of thickness varying
stretches)
from 75 mm to 350
PC & SC at some
stretches
silver
sand of varying
varying
thickness
from
of
thickness
varying thickness
mm
150 mm to 200
250mm at different
from 100 mm to
chainages
mm
chainages
250mm
been
found at different
chainages
150mm
of
to
has
from
Metals
at
different
Wearing course
Mostly SDBC
at
different chainages
Another sandwiched
bituminous layer of
varying thickness from
25 mm to 250 mm at
depth of 250mm to 540
mm
from Existing
20
25
30
35
KMP
KMP
KMP
KMP
to
to
to
to
25
30
35
40
KMP
KMP
KMP
KMP
:
:
:
:
540
450
450
450
mm
mm
mm
mm
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
EXISTING SURFACE DRAINAGE
FACILITIES
There are longitudinal drains (lined) present on piecemeal basis on
the following chainages:
CHAINAGE
SL.
DIRECTIO LENGTH
REMARKS
FROM
TO
NO
N
(m.)
Partly choked and
1
21+850 23+310
L.H.S
1460.00
reconstruction is
recommended
Partly choked and
22+120 22+215
R.H.S
95.00
reconstruction is
recommended
Partly choked and
3
4
5
6
7
22+675 22+765
22+765
23+370
24+825
25+310
23+230
23+700
25+050
25+615
R.H.S
L.H.S
L.H.S
L.H.S
L.H.S
90.00
reconstruction is
465.00
330.00
225.00
305.00
recommended
Functioning
Functioning
Functioning
Functioning
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
EXISTING SURFACE DRAINAGE
FACILITIES
SL.
NO
CHAINAGE
FROM
TO
DIRECTIO LENGTH
N
(m.)
REMARKS
Choked, damaged and
26+270 26+510
L.H.S
240.00
reconstruction is
recommended
26+565 26+605
L.H.S
40.00
Functioning
10
26+635 26+815
R.H.S
180.00
Functioning
11
26+750 26+850
L.H.S
100.00
Functioning
12
28+650 28+820
L.H.S
170.00
Functioning
13
29+060 29+100
L.H.S
40.00
Functioning
Partly choked and
14
15
16
31+260 31+300
31+385 31+420
31+700 31+840
L.H.S
L.H.S
L.H.S
40.00
reconstruction is
35.00
140.00
recommended
Functioning
Functioning
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
EXISTING SURFACE DRAINAGE
FACILITIES
SL.
NO
CHAINAGE
FROM
TO
DIRECTIO LENGTH
N
(m.)
REMARKS
17
32+175 32+230
L.H.S
55.00
Functioning
18
32+250 32+300
R.H.S
50.00
Functioning
19
32+330 32+460
L.H.S
130.00
Functioning
20
32+370 32+385
R.H.S
15.00
Functioning
21
32+820 32+960
R.H.S
140.00
Functioning
Partly choked and
22
33+485 33+565
L.H.S
80.00
reconstruction is
recommended
Total length of such drain is 4425 meters which is duly insufficient.
But the drain so observed is damaged or has lost drainage properties
at stretches due to sediment or lack of suitable outlet. At these
stretches, reconstruction is recommended, also other home-stead,
market areas are identified and construction of new Surface Drain
with built-over-footpath has been suggested.
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
PRESENCE OF WATERBODIES
Protective works are carried out to stabilize the shoulders and
embankment particularly in areas where water bodies are located
adjacent to the embankment. Guard wall in the form of gravity wall
list for protective works to be carried out, chainage wise have been
attached below:
CHAINAGE
SL.
LENGTH
DIRECTION
FROM
TO
NO
(m).
1
22+730
22+740
L.H.S
10
22+930
22+950
R.H.S
20
23+110
23+135
R.H.S
25
23+255
23+270
R.H.S
15
23+480
23+515
R.H.S
35
23+540
23+575
R.H.S
35
23+880
23+905
R.H.S
25
25+050
25+065
L.H.S
15
25+270
25+310
L.H.S
40
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
PRESENCE OF WATERBODIES
SL.
CHAINAGE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NO
FROM
TO
10
25+680
25+690
L.H.S
10
11
26+500
26+530
BOTH SIDE
60
12
26+545
26+565
L.H.S
20
13
26+640
26+680
R.H.S
40
14
32+120
32+150
L.H.S
30
15
32+130
32+140
R.H.S
10
16
32+515
32+575
L.H.S
60
17
32+695
32+720
L.H.S
25
18
32+970
32+995
L.H.S
25
19
33+000
33+050
R.H.S
50
20
33+140
33+175
L.H.S
35
(m).
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
PRESENCE OF WATERBODIES
SL.
CHAINAGE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NO
FROM
TO
21
33+830
33+850
L.H.S
20
22
35+270
35+290
R.H.S
20
23
35+775
35+800
R.H.S
25
24
35+915
35+980
R.H.S
65
25
37+270
37+290
L.H.S
20
26
38+125
38+140
L.H.S
15
27
38+400
38+410
L.H.S
10
(m).
TRAFFIC SURVEY
DETAILED INVESTIGATION
For design of following investigations were carried out.
1. 24 x 7 CTVC at Gopalpur More (KMP 33+200)
2. Axle load survey to incorporate overloading factor (for VDF
determination) into design
3. Open traverse survey with total station.
4. Geotechnical investigation for the project stretch of 20.00 KMs.
5. The existing composition study.
6. A detail reconnaissance survey
7. ROW details collected from the DL&LRO office
24 X 7 CTVC FINDINGS :TRAFFIC SURVEY :At the time of traffic count, the avg. daily traffic is found to be
14160 in nos.
avg. commercial vehicle per day (CVPD) is 1171 in nos.
PCU (Private car Unit) per day is
13140 in nos.
Average Directional split for fast Moving vehicle is
49:51
Average Directional split for slow Moving vehicle is
50:50
AXLE LOAD FINDING :-
11.3
(for
10.9
(for
3. MSA determination :
SL.
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
VALUE
Nos.
1171
Years
Years
15
11.3
.5
Findings
3. MSA determination :
A = P x (1 + r ) ^ n
A=
No. of commercial vehicles per day at the end of "n" years during
project
P=
r=
Annual growth
rate
=5%
n=
Nos. of years
=2 years
Therefor
1171 x (1 +
e,
A = 5/100)^2
1291.03
3. MSA determination :
Ns =
365 x A x ((1+r)^t-1) x F x L / r
A =
r =
t =
F =
L =
= 5%
= 15 yrs
= 11.3
= 0.5
Ns
= 57451230.8
(say)
Therefore , Ns
5.75E+07
57.46
MSA
PAVEMENT DESIGN
57.46 MSA
Total
Pavement
Thickness
(mm)
3.10%
805.4914
Pavement Composition
Bituminous Coarse
Granular
Base
Wearing
Binder
Coarse
Coarse
Coarse
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
41.49
137.33
250
Granular
Sub-base
Coarse
(mm)
375
40
140
250
175
200
150
Also
consolidated
capping
layer
of
thickness
150mm
PROPOSED CROSS-SECION:
i) Carriageway Width
Determination:
The Level of Service (LOS) for Rural highway is LOS B (page - 8
I) cl. 6.1 of IRC: - 64:1990)
II)
III)
IV) The Traffic Growth rate is 5% (page - 6 cl. 4.2.2 of IRC: - 37:2012)
V)
P x (1 + r ) ^ n
Annual growth
r=
rate
5%
pcu/da
15000 y
'B' DSV
(Page - 12, Table - 5, of IRC 64:1990)
Also, minimum 1.5 m wide paved shoulder increases the capacity by
15%, therefore the service volume for 2 lane wih paved shoulder
road is 15000+15% of 15000 = 17250.
Again, the design service volume of 2 lane divided carriageway is
3500 pcu / day
(Page - 13, Cl. 11.1, of IRC 64:1990)
Considering the volume of traffic at the end of the design life 30117
pcu
the required Carriageway Type is 4 Lane Divided carriageway.
But due to constraint of road land width it is recommended to go
for 2 lane with paved shoulder configuration at present.
12.00
73:1980)
iii) Cross - slope
determination
(IRC - 73:
I) For carriageway
II) For earth
1980)
(IRC -
2.0 %
73:1980)
3.0 %
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
AREA NEEDING SPECIAL TREATMENT:
Depending upon the existing road condition, soil investigation report, existing
Composition study, stretches of the project road need to be rebuilt & therefore
considered for resectioning in this Detailed Project Report. A chainage-wise
details of the proposed resectioning have been presented in the following table:
CHAINAGE
REASON FOR
SL.
NO
FROM
TO
22+800
23+700
REBUILDING
(m)
Low Embankment
LENGTH
(m.)
1000.0
Resectioning
proposed for
repeated failure due
23+700
24+400
700.00
to two nos. of
sandwiched
bituminous layers
34+000
34+900
Low Embankment
900.00
36+300
37+100
Low Embankment
800.00
SAFETY MEASURES
MAJOR INTERSECTIONS:
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
21+835
22+535
LHS
BADURIA
23+475
RHS
GOBIALI TO KANKRA
26+065
RHS
CHAKLA
26+260
LHS
GOBRA
28+430
LHS
BANAPARA
29+720
LHS
ARBERIA
31+815
RHS
MALOTIPUR
33+515
RHS
HAROA
10
35+640
LHS
BADURIA
VILLAGE on RHS
BERACHAMPA MARKET
Berachampa marke
SWARUPNAGAR
MATIA BAZAR
MATIA BAZAR
BENKI MORE
KHOLAPOTA BAZAR
MAJOR INTERSECTIONS:
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
CH: 22+535
CH: 21+835
MAJOR INTERSECTIONS:
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
CH:
23+475
CH:
26+065
CH: 26+260
&
CH: 28+430
MAJOR INTERSECTIONS:
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
CH.
CH.
CH.
CH.
29+720
31.815
33+515
35.640
MINOR INTERSECTIONS:
However,
some
minor
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
intersections
with
brick-pavement/concrete
road
or
bituminous roads with low to very low traffic and pedestrian movement were also
identified all along the road. they were characterized as minor intersections and
they were also recommended for further development but to a limited extent.
The following is the list of minor intersection to be proposed under improvement
SL.
CHAINAGE
TYPE
DIRECTION
CONNECTIVITY
NO
1
21+300
LHS
VILLAGE
26+210
RHS
VILLAGE
26+585
RHS
BEGAMPUR
27+670
RHS
PARA
27+805
LHS
PANIGOBRA
28+560
LHS
DHANNYAGURIA
28+980
LHS
DHANNYAGURIA
29+140
LHS
DHANNYAGURIA
30+070
LHS
TARAGUNIA
10
32+490
LHS
SANGBERIA
11
33+750
LHS
DHANNYAGURIA
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
SL.
CHAINAGE
TYPE
DIRECTION
12
34+205
LHS
RAHARHATI
13
35+150
RHS
MOYNALI
14
36+540
LHS
KANTHALTALA GHAT
15
37+245
LHS
SRIRAMPUR
16
38+170
LHS
HARISHPUR
17
38+440
LHS
HARISHPUR
18
38+770
RHS
BHABANIPUR
19
38+920
RHS
BHABANIPUR
20
39+025
RHS
BHABANIPUR
21
39+165
RHS
BHABANIPUR
22
39+510
RHS
VILLAGE
23
39+655
RHS
VILLAGE
24
39+720
RHS
VILLAGE
25
39+795
LHS
VILLAGE
NO
CONNECTIVITY
MINOR INTERSECTIONS:
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
The following is the minor intersection improvement plan as developed for this
road
Additional Area
MEDIAN Area
MEDIAN length
(sqm.)
(sqm.)
(m)
36.319
39.0344
32.3901
SALIENT FEATURES
PROPOSED SURFACE DRAINSAPPRECIATION
WITH BUILT OVER FOOTPATH
R.C.C. covered drain drain with BUILT OVER FOOTPATH AND SIDE
RAILING has been proposed to drain out the surface water easily & to
safe guard the road surface from water logging as well as RESTRICT
THE ENTRY OF PEDESTRIANS IN THE MAIN CARRIAGEWAY. The
chainage wise length of proposed surface drain has been tabulated
below:
SL.
NO
1
2
3
4
6
7
CHAINAGE
FROM
TO
21+27
21+50
0
26+13
0
26+47
0
26+15
0
26+44
0
29+29
0
29+43
0
31+75
0
32+09
0
31+80
0
32+10
0
33+53
0
33+77
ADJACENT BUILT UP
LENGTH
AREA
(m.)
DIRECTION
BADURIA MORE
460.00
Both Side
SWARUPNAGAR
340.00
R.H.S
SWARUPNAGAR
290.00
L.H.S
DHANYAKURIA
280.00
Both Side
BENKI MORE
340.00
L.H.S
BENKI MORE
300.00
R.H.S
SALIENT FEATURES
PROPOSED SURFACE DRAINSAPPRECIATION
WITH BUILT OVER FOOTPATH
SL.
NO
11
12
13
14
CHAINAGE
ADJACENT BUILT UP
LENGTH
AREA
(m.)
FROM
TO
37+25
37+70
RAGHUNATHPUR
0
37+15
0
37+27
MORE
RAGHUNATHPUR
0
37+30
0
37+70
MORE
RAGHUNATHPUR
0
38+02
0
38+12
MORE
450.00
R.H.S
120.00
L.H.S
400.00
L.H.S
BHABANIPUR MORE
200.00
Both Side
BHABANIPUR MORE
600.00
Both Side
39+70
40+00
DIRECTION
SALIENT FEATURES
PROPOSED SURFACE DRAINSAPPRECIATION
WITH BUILT OVER FOOTPATH
CROSS SECTIONS
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
In addition adequate numbers of
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
Road signage
Road marking
Road delineator
Road stud
Raised pavement Marker (CATs EYE)
Hazard Marker at CD locations
2 Nos. of GANTR mount Overhead Signage
Direction and Place Identification Signages have been
incorporated in the estimate.
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
Berachampa
Swarupnagar
Kholapota
Benki
Metia
Dhanyakuria
Gopalpur and
Bhabanipur
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
SALIENT FEATURES
APPRECIATION
COST ESTIMATE:
MATERIAL SPECIFICATION
Coarse Aggregate
LEAD
31 KMs
Barasat
Railway
Stack-yard
Locally Available
Locally Available
Cement
(OPC 33/43/53 Grade)
VG - 40 Bitumen
SOURCE
173 KMs
72 KMs
(MS Type)
Penetration Grade Bitumen
72 KMs
55 KMs
Locally Available
Haldia IOCL Refinery
Dhulagarh
Dhulagarh
Reinforcement Steel
(Fe 415 /Fe 500 /Fe 500D , conforms to
Kolkata
IS: 1786)
MORT&H Empanelled
Expansion Joint
Carried Earth
Suppliers
Land
Arranged
Lead: 4 KMs
Contractor
by
COST ESTIMATE
The aggregate considered is Pakur stone material, rates of which are
noted in Vol-III, (Roads & Bridges Works), PW (WB) SOR (rates upto 6 th
Corrigenda were taken)
So far soil for earth work is concerned, the borrow area will be finalized
only after obtaining satisfactory test results in accordance MORT&H
specification.
Plenty of bricks, sand and cement suppliers are available along side of the
corridor.
COST ABSTRACT:
Sl.
No.
Cost
(in Rupees Lakhs)
Description of Items
185.39
4601.25
318.44
811.66
A
b.
Cost of Guard-wall
Cost of Bullah Piling
760 metres
400 meters
133.68
17.15
c.
12800 Nos.
1.92
3485.7
268.84
152.75
327.86
COST ABSTRACT:
Sl.
No.
Cost
(in Rupees Lakhs)
Description of Items
Cost of 2 X 1 M HP Culvert
8 Nos.
1 Nos.
C
D
10
Cost of Horticulture
12 Nos.
1Nos.
16 Nos.
5050 meters
50.2
22.78
196.24
58.64
58.97
927.49
135.21
11273.55
11161.94
334.86
COST ABSTRACT:
Sl.
No.
Description of Items
Cost
55.81
111.62
281.84
11946.06
701.02
144.78
170.23
298.65
13260.74
13260.74
(In Words: Rupees One Thirty Two Crores Sixty Seven Lakhs Seventy Four Thousand only)
Cost Head
Total Cost
(in Rupees Lakhs)
Cost/KM
(in Rupees Lakhs)
8541.16
427.06
152.75
7.64
Cost of CD Structures
327.86
16.40
927.49
46.37
1130.10
56.51
Cos of Horticulture
135.21
6.76
1016.03
50.80
13260.74
663.04
THANK YOU