October 122016 A 2 Aagenda
October 122016 A 2 Aagenda
October 122016 A 2 Aagenda
INSTRUCTIONS:
1) Schedule 30 minutes at an upcoming STT meeting (ideally within the next two weeks) to
analyze the Site Visit Scorecard.
2) Before the meeting, each STT member should take 10 minutes to review the Scorecard
using the Site Visit Scorecard Reflection document (see p.2).
3) STT members bring their filled-out copies of the Site Visit Scorecard Reflection to the STT
meeting. This will be the implementation data for the meeting. Use the What Do You See?
What Do You Make of It? protocol (see pp.3-4) to discuss key takeaways from the
Summary and plan action items for STT and schoolwide improvement.
4) In the meeting, fill out the STT Site Visit Glows/Grows Form (a self-reflection on the Site
Visit). A note-taking template is included (see p.5) for your teams use during the
conversation.
Time: 60 minutes
Location: Office
Conference Room
Meeting Objectives:
Reflect on most recent Site Visit and accompanying Scorecard
Identify strengths and opportunities for improvement
Action plan based on data analysis to determine next steps for STT and schoolwide improvement
Meeting preparation:
Resources:
Topic
3 min
Getting
Started
12 min
Data
What do you see? (4 min): Each person takes 30 seconds to share their observations.
What do you make of it? (6 min): Each person shares a conclusion they have drawn from the
data.
10 min
Action
Identify the glows and grows the team would like to capture for Data Use, Collaboration, and
Instruction. Submit these with the STT Site Visit Glows/Grows Form.
What action steps do we need to commit to in order to capitalize on the feedback we received
2
from the Site Visit? Individuals reaffirm action steps they will take to support STT and schoolwide
improvement.
Action Item
Metacognition
Question Poster
Key questions
the school
Person Responsible
Open-Ended
Status
Team Leaders
placed around
Handing out
Admin
of
the
Planning
Scheduled for Oct 26 11-3
(lunch provided)
5 min
Reflection
Individually, answer the questions on the next page and discuss individual responses as a group.
Then, commit to improvements for next meeting.
Reflection
Yes
Did we commit to specific action steps that are clearly understood by all?
Was our collective time more efective than if we had worked as individuals?
Somewhat
No
Mistalyn: Instruction was our lowest area of both the Survey and Observation Results.
Clarification of data questions needs to happen
5
Conclusions:
Kristy: The teachers are working hard to implement some of the strategies from metacognition.
Marianne: Mental Model - What will it look like in diferent classrooms. Mental model needs to be clear, right now it is
not.
Liesl: Instruction - teachers were provided strategies. What are the strategies? What is the mental model for
implementation in question?
John: Concentrate on the instruction of the EBIS.
Kimberly: I dont know if teachers are really doing metacognition - believes there are low levels of understanding.
Angie: Instruction - short amount of time - not enough evidence displayed in our classrooms of what we are working on
for metacognition - snapshot of what is happening in our classrooms during observation.
Machelle: Whole board of Metacognition in classroom - Observation was only 15 minutes - observers wanted to see
what would happen in the class after they left - strong in data but need to be careful what the data shows or proves.
Collaboration
Instruction
Glow
Angie: amazing staying low on the
ladder of inference
Cris - we have the data
Grow
Mistalyn: clarifying the questions for
surveys
Action Plans:
Taking Implementation Rubric for Metacognition and pull down for each subject.
Chunk by teacher, students, and classroom.
Mental Model needs to be intrinsic - teachers need time to process
Make the Action Plan less confusing and complex.
Taking a half day to help start working on the Implementation Rubric for teachers on October 27, 2016.