General Theory of Relativity

In the theory of General Relativity, it introduces the innovative concept of spacetime intrinsically related to the density of matter.
In the past century, there has been an exemplary computing progression to complement theory, confirming the validity and opening up the door to new horizons of science and new scientific awareness: relativistic space-time correlations and the physics of space-time-matter interactions.
Relativity conceptually described these phenomena perfect in a manner but poses some concerns on theory physical dynamics.
The study performed attempts a survey through the Einstein's relativistic
correlation theory, which can describe how matter curves space -time, but do not solve the physical dynamics of how space-time interacts with matter.

We will first develop Einstein field equation with cosmological constant using Riemannian geometry.
Now I considered that cosmological constant is associated with the vacuum energy density of particle physics model. Using Euclidean quantum gravity of path integral formalism and use of Robertson Walker metric(RW) I calculate the contribution of matter density to the fluctuating metric. This method rather leads to the observed cosmological constant without any need of fine tuning in the gravity and the particle physics model. this straightforward approach is very much useful and it is justified for all points of view.

Dans la théorie du “réseau cosmologique” qui est présentée dans ce livre, le problème de l’unification des théories physiques et de la recherche d’une Théorie du Tout est traité d’une manière radicalement différente des autres approches de la littérature. Au lieu d’essayer de construire une théorie unifiée en bricolant un assemblage de théories existantes, en les rendant de plus en plus complexes et ésotériques, en ajoutant même d’étranges symétries et des dimensions supplémentaires pour leur “beauté mathématique”, on part exclusivement des concepts classiques les plus fondamentaux de la physique, qui sont l’équation de Newton et les deux premiers principes de la thermodynamique. Et à l’aide de ces principes fondamentaux, et en développant une géométrie originale basée sur les coordonnées d’Euler, on en vient, par un cheminement purement logique et déductif, à suggérer que l’Univers pourrait être un cristal, un réseau cubique tridimensionnel élastique et massif, et que les éléments constitutifs de la Matière Ordinaire pourraient être des singularités topologiques de ce réseau cristallin. Sur la base de ce concept original, on peut développer une description très complète de l’évolution spatio-temporelle de ce réseau cubique solide, que l’on appelle le “réseau cosmologique”, en introduisant dans un espace absolu infini un observateur purement imaginaire appelé le Grand Observateur GO. Si cet observateur est équipé d’un système de référence composé d’un référentiel euclidien absolu orthonormé pour localiser les points du réseau solide et d’une horloge absolue pour mesurer l’évolution temporelle du réseau solide dans l’espace absolu, une description très détaillée de l’évolution spatio-temporelle du réseau peut être élaborée sur la base du système de coordonnées d’Euler. Dans ce système de coordonnées, le Grand Observateur GO peut décrire de manière très détaillée les distorsions (rotations et déformations) et les contorsions (flexion et torsion) du réseau. En introduisant les principes physiques de base de la dynamique newtonienne et des deux principes de la thermodynamique, il est capable de décrire l’évolution spatio-temporelle du réseau cosmologique, en lui attribuant une masse d’inertie par cellules de base et une énergie interne spécifique de distorsion par unité de volume du réseau. Et il peut également introduire des singularités topologiques (dislocations, désinclinaisons et dispirations) sous forme de boucles fermées dans ce réseau cosmologique, en tant qu’éléments constitutifs de la matière ordinaire. Lorsque cette idée originale est développée en détail, il peut être démontré, par un cheminement mathématique purement logique et déductif, que, pour un réseau isotrope élastique satisfaisant à la loi de Newton, avec des hypothèses spécifiques sur ses propriétés élastiques, le comportement de ce réseau et ses singularités topologiques satisfont “toute” la physique actuellement connue, en faisant spontanément ressortir des analogies très fortes et souvent parfaites avec toutes les grandes théories physiques actuelles du macrocosme et du microcosme, telles que les équations de Maxwell, la relativité spéciale, la gravitation newtonienne, la relativité générale, la cosmologie moderne et la physique quantique. Mais cette théorie ne se contente pas de trouver des analogies avec les autres théories de la physique, elle propose également des explications assez originales, nouvelles et simples à de nombreux phénomènes physiques qui sont encore assez obscurs et mal compris à l’heure actuelle par la physique, comme la signification profonde et l’interprétation physique de l’expansion cosmologique, l’électromagnétisme, la relativité spéciale, la relativité générale, la physique quantique et le spin des particules. Il offre également des explications nouvelles et simples de la décohérence quantique (la limite de passage entre un comportement classique et un comportement quantique d’un objet), de l’énergie sombre, de la matière noire, des trous noirs, et de nombreux autres phénomènes. Le développement détaillé de cette théorie conduit également à des idées et des prédictions très innovantes, parmi lesquelles la plus importante est l’apparition de la charge de courbure, qui est une conséquence inévitable du traitement d’un réseau solide et de ses singularités topologiques en coordonnées d’Euler. Ce concept n’apparaît pas du tout dans toutes les théories modernes de la physique, telles que la relativité générale, la physique quantique ou le modèle standard, alors que dans notre théorie, ce concept fournit des explications pour de nombreux points obscurs de ces théories, tels que la force faible, l’asymétrie matière-antimatière, la formation des galaxies, la ségrégation entre matière et antimatière au sein des galaxies, la formation de trous noirs gigantesques au cœur des galaxies, la disparition apparente de l’antimatière dans l’Univers, la formation d’étoiles à neutrons, le concept de matière noire, la nature bosonique ou fermionique des particules, etc. Enfin, l’étude de réseaux présentant des symétries spéciales appelées symétries axiales, symboliquement représentées par des réseaux cubiques 3D “colorés”, nous permet d’identifier une étonnante structure de réseau dont les singularités topologiques bouclées coïncident parfaitement avec la zoologie complexe de toutes les particules élémentaires du Modèle Standard, et qui nous permet également de trouver des explications physiques simples aux forces faibles et fortes du Modèle Standard, y compris les phénomènes de confinement et de liberté asymptotique.

The writers investigate the possibility of an atomistic theory of matter and electricity which, while excluding singularities of the field, makes use of no other variables than the g μν of the general relativity theory and the ϕ μ of the Maxwell theory. By the consideration of a simple ...

We will define the mass of an electron in the context of Weinberg's empirical formula that relates the mass of a pion to fundamental physical constants, namely the gravitational and Planck constants, the speed of light in vacuum and the Hubble constant. After redefining the Weinberg formula to apply for electrons instead of pions we will add density parameters, used in modern Cosmology, to the Hubble constant in an attempt to persevere the universality of free fall which is one of the corner stones of General Relativity. Universality of free fall is not violated if fundamental physical constants do not vary with time which will be demonstrated in the aforementioned empirical formula for the electron mass and thus, subsequently the proton-to-electron mass ratio, the fine structure constant as well as for the gravitational constant.

In this paper we will illustrate how to constrain unavoidable Kähler corrections for N = 1 supergravity (SUGRA) inflation from the recent Planck data. We will show that the non-renormalizable Kähler operators will induce in general non-minimal kinetic term for the inflaton field, and two types of SUGRA corrections in the potential — the Hubbleinduced mass (cH), and the Hubble-induced A-term (aH) correction. The entire SUGRA inflationary framework can now be constrained from (i) the speed of sound, cs, and (ii) from the upper bound on the tensor to scalar ratio, r⋆. We will illustrate this by considering a heavy scalar degree of freedom at a scale, Ms, and a light inflationary field which is responsible for a slow-roll inflation. We will compute the corrections to the kinetic term and the potential for the light field explicitly. As an example, we will consider a visible sector inflationary model of inflation where inflation occurs at the point of inflection, which can match the dens...

This paper summarizes how a new approach to the Universe based on the existence of a "crystalline ether", which has recently been detailed in the third versions of two books [1], makes it possible to find a simple, unified and coherent explanation of all the theories of modern physics and of the Universe. The basic concepts of this approach can be summarized as follows: (i) the support of the Universe is a form of "crystalline ether" which consists of a solid and massive lattice, of facecentered cubic structure, with the simplest possible elasticity, and in which matter is represented by the set of topological singularities of this lattice (loops of dislocations, disinclinations and dispirations), and (ii) this lattice exclusively satisfies, in absolute space, the basic classical physical concepts that are Newton's law and the two principles of thermodynamics. With these basic classical concepts alone, we show that it is possible to find all the modern theories of physics, namely that the behaviors of this lattice (the Universe) and its topological singularities (the Matter) satisfy electromagnetism, special relativity, general relativity, gravitation, quantum physics, cosmology and even the standard model of elementary particles.

Based upon the idea of vacuum quanta, the paper proposes a model for the action of the gravitational force. This hypothesis offers a mechanistic theory of the local curvature of space-time and it leads to an explanation of the expansion of the universe.

Around 1936, Einstein wrote to his close friend Max Born telling him that, together with Nathan Rosen, he had arrived at the interesting result that gravitational waves did not exist, though they had been assumed a certainty to the first approximation. He finally had found a mistake in his 1936 paper with Rosen and believed that gravitational waves do exist. However, in 1938, Einstein again obtained the result that there could be no gravitational waves!

The case is made that the Hilbert or "textbook Schwarzschild" solution is an excellent choice for the most misunderstood exact solution in theoretical physics. This is based on the manner in which the solution is obtained, the underlying mathematical properties that surround the solution, the behavior of the solution in terms of relevant variables, the physical significance of the solution, and the misguided analyses that tried to turn a solution of the time dependent spherically symmetric vacuum field equations into a soluton of the time independent equations.

The Energy Problem (EP) in General Relativity (GR) is analyzed in the context of GR’s inconsistencies. EP is classified according to its local and global aspects. The local aspects of the EP include noncovariance of the energy-momentum pseudotensor (EMPT) of the gravitational field, non-uniqueness of the EMPT, asymmetry of EMPT and vanishing metric energy-momentum tensor. The global aspect of the EP relates to the lack of integral conservation laws due to the general difficulties in defining invariant integrals of tensors in non-Euclidean space. These difficulties are related to the lack of a precise definition of a reference frame in the GR. A reference frame is defined here as a differential manifold with an Affine connection. The resulting unique decomposition of the Levi-Civita connection into its Affine and nonmetric parts allows for a covariant definition of the gravitational energy-momentum tensor. It is pointed out that the invariance of the Lagrangian (or action functional) is a necessary but not sufficient condition to secure the covariance of the Lagrange-Euler field theory. A rigorous definition of the Lagrange Field Structure (LFS) on differential manifolds is proposed. A covariant generalization of the first Noether theorem for LFS is obtained. Different approaches to the EP are discussed.

In this research, I will try to give a simple, more general understanding of how gravity works. To do that, we will go in a journey to see what the old (Newtonian) and the new (Einstein) picture of gravity
is. And to season that, we will finish by introducing quantum Gravity. I will begin by defining the Kepler's laws for planetary motion, which Depending on it Newton created his theory for gravity, and we finish the section by Newtons gravity failure. Then I will start our discussion for Einstein's picture of gravity (general relativity), and cover rather some important topics, such as; Equivalence principle, Space-Time geometry, Einstein Field Equation...Etc., and I will finish the section by Einstein's answer to Newtonian failure. Finally I will give a very simple introduction to Quantum Gravity, and mainly discuss the some of the problems that phases the theory to be perfect.

Special Relativity Theory (SRT) has two postulates, one stating that the laws of physics are the same for all observers, and the other stating that the speed of light is the constant 186,000 miles per second, regardless of any reference frames. As a result of these postulates, SRT renders predictions such as: 1) No object can travel faster than 186,000 miles per second (the speed of light itself); 2) On approaching the speed of light, a moving object contracts in length in the direction of motion, while 3) a clock traveling with the object slows down; 4) The mass of an object multiplied by the square of the speed of light gives energy ( E mc2 ); i.e., mass could be converted to energy and vice versa; 5) Observers do not agree on the simultaneity of events - two events that are simultaneous for one observer might not be simultaneous for another.

There are evident inconsistencies among these predictions. There is also a philosophical problem relating to the nature of reality. Could there be more than one reality in Nature; that is, can reality be subjective, and only a matter of interpretation? This paper explores the evident inconsistencies and the philosophical problem by developing arguments and providing numerical examples.

In our previous article in reference [1], we were able to reformulate Maxwell's equations in a simplified and microscopic form. This article on the other hand is a follow-up of the aforementioned article but in this case it is shown that gravity may have electromagnetic origins, using as basis this reformulated Maxwell's equations. As a matter of fact, it is suggested in this article that thorough experimental investigations with neutrons could help us really understand gravity fundamentally. This however is based on the fact that a certain property of neutrons was calculated in this article using the assumption of the electromagnetic origins of gravity and this calculated value seems to correspond with the data that was obtained from an experiment performed some time ago (over 50 years ago) by Shull et al-see the article in reference [2]. Also, the rotation curve of galaxies, especially the spiral ones is revisited and it's shown that the assumption of the electromagnetic origins of gravity can explain it. This paper may also be handy to those who seek a unified/single theoretical framework for all fundamental forces.

Dans cette brève communication, nous résumons comment une nouvelle approche de l’Univers, qui a été récemment exposée en détail dans deux livres, permet de trouver une explication simple, unifiée et cohérente de l’ensemble des théories de la physique moderne.
Les concepts de base de cette approche peuvent se résumer simplement de la manière suivante: (i) le support de l’Univers est une forme d’«éther» qui consiste en un réseau solide et massif, avec une élasticité la plus simple possible, et dans lequel la matière est représentée par l'ensemble des singularités topologiques de ce réseau (boucles de dislocations, de disclinaisons et de dispirations), et (ii) ce réseau satisfait exclusivement, dans l'espace absolu, les concepts physiques classiques de base que sont la loi de Newton et les deux principes de la thermodynamique.
Avec ces seuls concepts de base tout-à-fait classiques, on retrouve toutes les théories modernes de la physique, à savoir que les comportements de ce réseau (l’Univers) et de ses singularités topologiques (la Matière) satisfont à l’électromagnétisme, la relativité spéciale, la relativité générale, la gravitation, la physique quantique, la cosmologie et même le modèle standard des particules élémentaires.

Since the end of the 18th century scientists have pondered over, what is today, one of the most exotic and mysterious objects in the universe. The mathematical definition of a black hole is a direct consequence of Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, which predicts a theoretical singularity with infinite density. There have been many studies over the years that look to correcting the uncertainties within the current black hole model, however there has been no major theoretical or mathematical breakthrough that develops our knowledge of what a black hole truly is. This study presents an alternative structure to the current understanding of a black hole by applying the underlying principles of the Time Compression Theory. The new structure eliminates the presence of a singularity and results in an extremely dense mass, named the 'black sphere'. Infalling and distant observers are introduced which shows that the processes of spaghettification and compressional redshift are equivalent to today's understanding, and evidence of time dragging and ripples in time replace the notions of frame dragging and gravitational waves. The Time Compression Theory is an innovative concept, whose applications have the possibility to change the global perception of black holes. Future studies will use this structure to describe spiral galaxies and dark matter, and the same principles can be used within quantum mechanics - providing evidence for the first unified theory.

Note: It is highly recommended that readers have an understanding of the basic principles of the Time Compression Theory given in [1], before progressing.

All alleged black hole solutions pertain to a universe that is spatially infinite, is eternal, contains only one mass, is not expanding, and is asymptotically flat or asymptotically curved. But the alleged big bang cosmology pertains to a universe that is spatially finite (one case) or spatially infinite (two different cases), is of finite age, contains radiation and many masses including multiple black holes (some of which are primordial), is expanding, and is not asymptotically anything. Thus the black hole and the big bang contradict one another – they are mutually exclusive. The black hole is almost universally claimed to be predicted by General Relativity. It is surprisingly easy to prove that this is not true. Similarly it is very often claimed that Newton’s theory of gravitation also predicts the black hole, but this too is very easily proven to be erroneous. Despite numerous claims for discovery of black holes in their millions, nobody has ever actually found one.  In addition it is not very difficult to prove that General Relativity violates the usual conservation of energy and momentum, with only a little use of mathematics. The simple proofs also demonstrate that all ‘singularity theorems’ related to General Relativity are invalid. Fundamentally there are contradictions contained in the very physical principles of General Relativity, combined with invalid mathematics, which render the theory untenable. It is the object of this paper to provide the proofs without the complicated mathematics usually associated with the subject.

The Dynamic Universe theory is a holistic description of the observable physical reality. Like the Copernican revolution, the DU creates a system perspective allowing straightforward mathematics and a conceivable cosmological picture of the universe — and gives precise predictions to observables without dark energy or other artificial parameters. It is a unifying theory converting spacetime in variable coordinates into dynamic space in absolute coordinates. The Dynamic Universe theory relies on an overall zero-energy balance in space and the conservation of the total energy in interactions in space. Instead of the relativity of an object to the observer, relativity in DU space means relativity of local to the whole — relativity appears a measure of the locally available share of the total energy in space.

In a recent comment published in EJP [1], we have derived the relationship between coordinate acceleration and coordinate speed for the case of radial motion in Schwarzschild coordinates by using the Euler-Lagrange formalism. The Euler-Lagrange formalism has the advantage that it circumvents the tedious calculations of the Christoffel symbols and it is more intuitive, in the present note we show how to derive the equations of motion for the more complicated case of test probes orbiting not only Schwarzschild black holes but also charged, rotating ones. We show how to extend the study to the more complicated case of rotating black holes that is, to the space-time described by Kerr and Kerr-Newman metrics. The note is intended for graduate students and for the instructors who teach GR.

A description of new particles for space and time. While the chronon is a superluminal, acoustic fracton, the space particle is a ten dimensional, superliminal, acoustic phonon of deva life. Space is analogous to an ocean of water without a lattice structure in and of itself. Like the photon, the space phonon experiences squeezed coherent states. The phase-squeezed state is what permits ‘universes within universes’ or multiverse. The apparent space-time curvature, as noted by Einstein’s equations, is actually the movement of the chronon fracton lattice.

A complete theoretical and mathematical description of how electric fields change due to relative motion that includes an in-depth analysis of relativistic electric fields and the methods to effect motion.

This new description is based on James Maxwell's original bi-quaternion that includes descriptions and examples of how to use these electric field differences to create an all new propellant-less spacecraft propulsion device.

Thomas Kuhn defined the characteristics of scientific revolutions based to a large extent upon his knowledge of the first and second Scientific Revolutions. He concluded that scientific revolutions are the result of crises faced by previous theoretical paradigms. However, he missed some important clues of how revolutions develop. Instead of emphasizing the crises, historians should look at the major trends in scientific and human thought prior to the revolutions. By doing so, they could actually gain a better understanding of how scientific revolutions emerge during the normal course of scientific evolution and progress. Instead of defining revolutions by the crises that precede them, revolutions actually emerge from the successes of previous theoretical attempts while each revolution contains the seeds for the next revolution that follows. These seeds eventually grow into the crises that trigger revolutions. Under these circumstances, it can be shown that the space-time revolution of relativity theory was never completed, thus laying the foundations for the next revolution in science. Knowing this, we can consider the possibility that we have already entered a pre-revolutionary period for the Third Scientific Revolution.

Time is a simple word, though it remains truly the most mysterious and vicious phenomena where every living and non-living ones are its victim. This antediluvian force of nature shows no mercy as it moves along every path, every corner sniffing over its wounded and marks victory over one after another. Time mystifies us with the maze of moments and wraps up in the illusion that it would last forever. Indeed, some gets time and some even gets the time of their lives but as one stares at the clock know for sure that time is creeping in onto her/his territory. And with the fractured youth and battered adolescent, one finds her/himself feeble against the ultimate ambush of time as it calmly introduces the being to the prime truth of all. Tirelessly, we chase the days as we make it to the journey of life as we know it. The fixture of sunrise and sunset detonates the moments, and all familiarity seems like occasions held seconds ago. There is no escape. The mystic hands of the clock never greet one at the same spot twice.

But, what if we could actually travel back in time and into the future? There has always been a great deal of interest in time-travel. It has been the center of many science fictions. And frankly, who wouldn't want to travel through time and aspire to a part of this surreal experience?  Through time travel and consequently with the aid of time machine, one can explore the different periods of time, both in the context of past as well as of the future and in that way, one can somewhat overlook the existent that is traditionally allocated to him/her.

The idea of time travel has fascinated human beings for quite some time and from scientists to writers to artists, everybody alike fancied the idea of time travel, pondered about going back to the past as well as take a journey into the future and ultimately unlock and master the mysteries of time itself. And, this book timely tells the story of the spectacular journey of the phenomena now known as Time Travel.

This essay uncovers to what extent the foundational principles of physics
have endured since The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence through
contemporary developments in Relativity and Quantum mechanics (QM).
Clarke’s arguments reflect Newton’s experiments, which proved
differences between absolute and relative motion. Leibniz’s focus on
relations and events foreshadows Einstein’s concepts of spacetime, which
does not exist on its own, and simultaneity, which is observer dependent.
Though spacetime is curved in the General Theory of Relativity (GR),
unlike the homogenous and symmetric space assumed by the two 18thcentury
philosophers, it is the curvature that facilitates the bodily
movements that Leibniz knew were not produced via force from a distance.
Ultimately, I show that Leibniz’s relationism and Principle of Sufficient
Reason, both pivotal in debating Clarke, will be instrumental in guiding the
unification of GR with QM, which models networks of particles
probabilistically — improving our understanding of the origins and
trajectory of our universe.

This is a follow up from the Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström Black Hole Quasinormal Modes paper, where the energy released by different types of black holes was analysed. In this paper the physical properties of these black holes, along with more complexed versions, will be looked at on a mathematical and theoretical footing by using different coordinate systems such as the Kruskal Coordinates, and the Penrose diagram will be used to discuss the geometry of each spacetime solutions to the Einstein field equations. How wormholes are formed, uniqueness and the No Hair theorem will also be given in the process and related to physical possibilities in nature. 2

This book is a comprehensive presentation of the main topics of contemporary Theoretical Physics : the Geometry of the Universe and Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Mechanics and momentum, Force Fields and gravitation, Nuclear Particles and Nuclear Fields, Stable systems, discontinuous processes and Bosons. Starting from the concepts of Physics it shows how the representations introduced in the last 70 years such as  spinors and gauge fields can be used to build a consistent Theoretical and Unified Theoretical Physics, encompassing all the known phenomenon, from elementary particles to stars systems, without the need for exotic interpretations, such as additional dimensions or particles. The book introduces new mathematical tools, which are documented in a substantial appendix.

The first two attempts to derive a unified field theory as an extension to general relativity were made by Weyl and Kaluza. The main idea was to develop a geometrical model whereby both gravity and electromagnetism emerged naturally from the same curved space-time continuum. Over the years, each of these attempts has engendered one of the main groupings of classical (non-quantum) unified field theories. Weyl sought to alter the geometry of the continuum while maintaining the number of dimensions at four. Kaluza sought to maintain the geometry of the continuum, but account for electromagnetism by altering the number of dimensions to five. It is generally believed that Kaluza’s was the first five-dimensional model of material reality and that it was largely ignored by the scientific community except for Klein’s attempt to use the model as a basis for quantizing relativity, but the model does have a separate history independent of Klein’s modification.  The mere assumption of a five-dimensional space-time structure can take two basic forms, both of which are not as independent of the other as one would expect or hope. First of all, the five-dimensional space-time may be used as a mathematical formalism alone, which has no more meaning than to allow for the extra variables needed to incorporate the electromagnetic field into a single space-time structure. In this manner, the fifth dimension is assumed to have no physical meaning. It was this form that Kaluza’s theory assumed so Kaluza’s original model merely duplicated Maxwell’s electromagnetic model without adding any new physics. In the second type of these theories, the fifth dimension is given an actual physical reality. It is a basic necessity of this type of theory to explain why the fifth dimension seems to be beyond the natural experience of human perception.

In this article, we derive the gravitational time dilation factor in a new manner, which allows us to identify the mathematical cause of Schwarzschild radius, to give a theoretical way to avoid it and to compute properties of black hole. General relativity effects are computed as simple as in special relativity. Observability of black hole is discussed.

Work in progress explaining the flight of the Tic Tac UFO Close Encounter with US Navy Nimitz Battle Group off the coast of San Diego for two weeks in November of 2004. The apparent accelerations of ~ 6,000g and shape shifting are smoking gun evidence of extremely low power warp drive with time-travel-to past capability in a meta-material fuselage controlled by a conscious AI post-quantum "computer." This technology renders all our weapons impotent and obsolete if they decide to attack. US Space Force must have this technology.

V6 is updated to include approximate Green's function integral equation for the low -power warp field induced by the electromagnetic fields in the double hull. More math typos corrected. Discussion of time-frequency analysis generalized to 4D for spatially inhomogenous dynamic warp field generated in the fuselage leading to Moscow physicist Mikhail Altaisky's use of scale-dependent wavelet transforms in quantum field theory, turbulence, neural net machine learning AI et-al.

Having found several erroneities, chimerae, lacunae, malaphors and their sequalae, or (at least generally considered) 'sub-literate' comments and notations in the work of renowned SuperPhysicist Albert Einstein, I have concluded that it is incumbent upon me as a sentient witness, thereof, that I convey and expose the flaws of Mr. Einstein's mildly eccentric ideas to those who are willing to listen and learn.