Cosmology (Physics)

World – Universe Model is based on three primary assumptions:
1) The World is finite and is expanding inside the Universe with speed equal to the electrodynamic constant c. The Universe serves as an unlimited source of energy that continuously enters into the World from the boundary.
2) Medium of the World, consisting of protons, electrons, photons, neutrinos, and dark matter particles, is an active agent in all physical phenomena in the World.
3) Two fundamental parameters in various rational exponents define all macro and micro features of the World: Fine-Structure Constant α, and dimensionless quantity Q.  While α is constant, Q increases with time, and is in fact a measure of the size and the age of the World.
The World – Universe Model explains experimental data accumulated in the field of Cosmology over the last decades: the size and age of the World; critical energy density and the gravitational parameter; temperatures of the cosmic microwave background radiation and black body radiation of cosmic dust; fractal structure of the World and its evolution; observed expansion of the World and cosmological redshift. Additionally, the Model makes predictions pertaining to masses of dark matter particles, photons, axions, and neutrinos; proposes new types of particle interactions (Super Weak and Extremely Weak) and the fundamental physical parameters of the World; gives a new “low density small white dwarf” model of Ball Lightning and dineutrino model of Extreme Ball Lightning based on super weak interaction; explains “Pioneer Anomaly”; and resolves paradoxes like “Matter – Antimatter Asymmetry” and “Faint Young Sun”. The Model proposes to introduce a new fundamental parameter  Q  in the CODATA internationally recommended values for calculating time dependent parameters of the World.

What does this little equation have to do with the LHC?

Key words:    hierarchy of energy, Gordon's Theory of Everything, " smallest something " , Ruby Slipper Conundrum, Gordon Omnipresent Dot, GOD entities, the GOD Equation, the Gordon Model, Gordon Energy States, equi-energy position, primordial photon, parallel planar universe

The discussion of the Theory of EVERYTHING has been continued with a concerted interest on physicality, and in particular, the concept of Dark Matter and consciousness embodiment, making a reference to the advent of Core Manifestation Body Template or concept of Morphogenetic Field. It is elucidated that contrary to the erroneous conjecture of the mainstream science, Dark Matter is not just something that is only simply responsible for gravity. Indeed, it is true that Dark Matter epitomizes what ‘holds’ everything together in physicality. Yet, Dark Matter is not just regular matter that is only indigenous to 3D physicality, nor is “dark” by any means, both in terms of its Light quotient and frequency of vibration. Dark Matter manifests itself as plasma waves that has a spectral density that begins from highly comparatively lower constitution, and thus, high Light quotient and frequency of particulate (as well anti-particulate) vibration, all the way making the fabric of the to the 81st space-time dimension, to that of our Harmonic Universes, as well as forming our consciousness embodiment. Indeed, it is better to altogether dispense with the terminology of “Dark” and replace it with “Stealth” matter. In fact, Dark Matter is the essence or the substance of what emerges from the eternal spirit of the God-SOURCE. And, Dark Matter epitomizes what constitutes and builds the layers of our Lightbody that, in turn, give rise to the formation of our material atomic body. Thus, the Dark Matter body may be viewed as the connection link that exists between the eternal spiritual Light SOURCE body of the Prime Creator and the finite level of our Light source body. The Core Manifestation Body is governed by the Dark Matter Template, the blueprint or the instruction sets that our Eternal Source Particle Atoms and Molecules are built in order to generate the layers of our Eternal Light Body determining our bioenergetics, in turn, giving rise to our morphogenetic field that forms the DNA and RNA structure of our genetics. And, all this entails is the conversion of energy into matter. Dark Matter Template holds a cell that has the instruction set for the Elemental Body that is specific to the matter substance that is connected to a specific Harmonic Universe (e.g., HU1, HU2, HU3, and even HU4), and thus, provides the very means for our very consciousness embodiment. Note that quantum field affects the organization of the
Space-time or ‘dimensions,’ which in turn, determines the structure of the timelines that forms the Nebadon Time Matrix that defines our 4 holographic Harmonic Universes. This is what is commonly referred to as the 12D Grid or Tree of Life, the blueprint matrices of the Time Matrix that make up the layers of the Morphogenetic Fields of the Earth, as a macrocosm, and in turn, us, as the microcosm that determine our Consciousness reality and evolution. This establishes a system of communication that connects and realigns Earth and its planetary Light body structure via certain portals and stargates to the rest of the Cosmos, something that may be described as ‘holographic geography,’ the geometric intelligence that connects all the star systems in our local universe to the surface grid of our planet. Note that any changes in the Dark Matter Template Body (the ‘Rasha Body’), signifies a shift occurring in our physical body and physicality. And, in turn, any change in our orientation in matter, signifies a change in the fabric of space-time dimension to which our consciousness is anchored. Accordingly, a review of our quantum consciousness embodiment structure within the Nebadon Universe that may be classified under the concepts of ‘Soul Aspects,’ ‘Soul Expression,’ ‘Oversoul,’ and ‘Avatar’ matrix that was initially depicted by the ‘Carousel-Wheel of Consciousness’ by the author, is re-articulated, herein. Finally, a brief discussion of the relevance of magnetic energies discharge to the Planetary Dark Matter Body Template and the nature of the subtle energies, as well as Gravity, Black-White Holes, and Wormholes has been presented.

Part I – Spirilla Theory and Cosmology
Stephen Hawking once proclaimed that String Theory may be able to unify the various forces although later he became disillusioned thinking that there may be no Theory of Everything. This very condensed book pulls together the various forces into the Spirilla Theory which supersedes String Theory and introduces the Relativity of Consciousness.

The foundation of the Spirilla Theory is based on the writings of H. P. Blavatsky, A. B. Bailey, and A. Besant. By overlaying the works of Einstein, Bohm, de Broglie, Dirac, Bell and other great scientific minds, on top of the foundation, the unification of the various forces and theories starts to appear; each field of study supplying a part of the puzzle but only a holistic view of ALL endeavors will solve the mystery. The book starts by laying the groundwork through the Introduction, a review of Bell’s Theorem and p-adic mathematics; following this, each major section begins with a quote from the foundational works followed by the quotes from scientific papers demonstrating the current known thinking on the various topics; no attempts are made to edit the works (except with a few exceptions for clarity and/or length) of the various authors and references to the scientists’ works are maintained. Each section is pulled together so that a picture can be seen.
This section;
1. Redefines the atom with the addition of a subquark;
2. Defines the Spirilla Theory which unifies Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity, and explains Quantum Entanglement;
3. Defines new particles;
4. Redefines time and space;
5. Defines and solves the mystery of Black Holes and links the cosmic and quantum black hole through the spirillae;
6. Delves into the mystery of the Macroverse;
7. Outlines the steps in the origins of the universe;
8. Adds an equation to Einstein’s original 1905 paper on relativity which sees the speed of light approaching infinity;
9. Gives the foundation for developing space travel; and, as an appendix,
10. Gives detailed information for the development of a new energy source – Quantum Energy.

Part II - Ontology, Epistemology & Manifestations
Part II is divided into three sections:
1. Ontology and the fundamental concepts of reality which discusses:
a. consciousness and delves into the mystery of human consciousness having cosmic origins;
b. reincarnation and gives the various laws affecting rebirth, with a discussion on the principle of mutation and the perfecting of form;
c. the work of form-building, transmutation of form and the building of a human form.
2. Epistemology which covers a great deal of topics however; for the purposes of NOE the subject is restricted to;
a. evolution including a definition of the Law of Evolution, the cyclic ebb and flow and the rhythmic work of creation, the process of substitution, the evolution of man and the genesis of the pithecoid stocks; and
b. death including the processes of death, two main reasons for cremation and the sequence of events at death.
3. Manifestations of the various religions including:
a. why Christians don’t believe in reincarnation;
b. the coming science of invocation and evocation;
c. Quantum Entanglement Over Time (QEoT) or The Law of Cause and Effect, and The Law of Karma with a discussion on The Golden Rule ; and
d. The New World Religion.

Luke, D., & Spowers, R. (Eds.)(2021). DMT entity encounters: Dialogues on the spirit molecule. Rochester, VT: Park Street Press.

Available on Kindle from 2nd November, with paperback launches on 30th November (USA) and 9th December (UK). there will also be an audiobook version out shortly after...

With contributions from the late Ralph Metzner, Chris Bache, Whitley Strieber, Jefrey Kripal, Angela Voss, Bill Richards, Chris Timmermann, Michael Winkelman, Luis Eduardo Luna, Anton Bilton, Bernard Carr, Daniel Pinchbeck, Dennis McKenna, Ede Frecska, David Luke and many more...


https://www.innertraditions.com/books/dmt-entity-encounters

In this work, we take a short recap of a formal framework of the Eddington-inspired Born–Infeld (EiBI) theory of gravity and derive the point-like Lagrangian for underlying theory based on the use of Noether gauge symmetries (NGS). We study a Hessian matrix and quantify Euler–Lagrange equations of EiBI universe. We discuss the NGS approach for the Eddington-inspired Born–Infeld theory and show that there exists the de Sitter solution in this gravity model.

All UFOs in this world have one source: the Moon, the hatch to the Otherworld that sends them here. // У всех НЛО в мире этом источник один: Луна, люк в шлющий их мир Иной.

Землянину, зрящему поле Луны, дивен плеск иной жизни на этой суровой пустынной планете. Луна, мнится нам – порт миров, с нами дéлящих общий, ей внешний простор, что вселенной зовем мы. Но истина в том, что ЛУНА — ДВЕРЬ В ИНОЕ, портал сутям Неба как Глуби Луны. Из нее, тайной, к нам их поход, жизнь на лунном лице есть РОДНИК ИЗНУТРИ. Люди сей Земли, мы — его капли; Луна, люк Причины — нам Мать, к Миру ключ в мудрой длани. Об этом работа моя.

Thus, the following possibilities:
a) It applies “The absolute Coordinate system and the absolute Time of the Universe”
as in
“Appendant Document 2, from November 16, 2015”
described.
b) This “Absolute Time of the Universe” is set for Earth.
c) A spaceship in the visible universe can observe the fixed time, which is set on earth.
Technical details need not to be described here.

This results in:

A Real Absolute Coordinate System and a real Absolute Time of the Universe

A mathematical expression for the recessional redshift z_rec of astronomical sources of light is derived based on the Universe expansion factor proposed by Silva [1]. Numerical calculations are done by using the following: Hubble constant H0 = 69.32 km s^−1 M pc ^−1 = 0.0709 Gyr ^−1 and the current age of the Universe T0 = 13.772 Gyr [2]. The recessional redshift increases with increasing lookback distances d_lb , initially in a linear manner (z_rec = H0 c d_lb) and then in a positively accelerated way reaching the maximum value of exp(H0 T0/ β) − 1 = 4.377 at d^lb = c T0. The linear part should hold up to the lookback distance of 0.8 M pc. The receding velocities v rec are also expressed in terms of the recessional redshifts z_rec ; they grow up linearly (v_rec = c z_rec) until z_rec = 0.2. Receding velocities above 0.845 Gly/Gyr and recessional redshifts above 1.610 occur in the matter era.

The progress in the field of computers in addition to improving our lives, is also helping to better understand the universe .
Understanding the logic of computing and information is changing the way we look at the universe
from the philosophical point of view and is helping us to better understand the physical laws that form the basis of cosmology .

It is imperative "now" to go beyond our anthropological limits, through an upright mental position, which I have called Conscious Evolutionary Consciousness PaleontoLogicaMente ISOCIC.  It is necessary to get out from under Einstein's skirts and finish the work he courageously started but left unfinished.

As I commented several times, trying to attract the attention of the unconscious to be unconscious, therefore nicknamed inCoScientists, is about time to step forward - evolutionary forward - with respect to Einstein’s “happiest thought”.

What causes the wave formation of the reality / particle duality to collapse is the interference of the same "conscious measurement" which absurdly does not want to take into account itself.  This can be done "simply" by accepting relativity without distinction between inertial and accelerated mass in an "infinitely accelerated" hypersphere of the universe as it is now accepted where any ray has the same number of points before any inertial observer "all about all "consciously conscious instantly entangled" causing "the collapse of the formation of the waves of reality.

Viktor T.Toth on QUORA

What is the simplest and easiest to understand way to explain how mass increases with velocity?

The simplest way: Mass does not increase with velocity.

Seriously. Mass does not increase with velocity.

When you move relative to an object (remember: motion is always relative, so an object moving relative to you or you moving relative to that object mean literally the same thing) that object does not change. It does not even know that you are moving relative to it. However, in your frame of reference, it is that object that moves, and as a result, it has kinetic energy as calculated by you. (For another observer, moving along with the object, the object is at rest and has zero kinetic energy.)

Some authors, especially in the older literature, combined this kinetic energy and the rest mass-energy of the object into a quantity called relativistic mass.

This quantity is meaningless. It differs for different observers moving at different speeds relative to the object. It really has no practical use whatsoever. It only confuses people, rather badly, about relativity theory.


Geoffrey Edwards on QUORA


As velocity increases the mass of the object increases in a linear fashion until infinite energy is required to move an infinite mass. Is time dilation a result of the gravitational field generated by the mass of the object?

No. Mass does not increase. The momentum of an object increases with velocity like this:

p = \gamma*m*v

where p is the usual letter for momentum and \gamma is the relativistic gamma factor. Early on, people noticed that you could absorb the gamma into the m, call it ‘relativistic mass’ (M = gamma*m) and recover the usual Newtonian relation:

p = Mv

As well, this mass had the usual property that if you pushed on the object along the direction of motion with force F you got an acceleration a = F/M. However, this particular analogy probably started to die when people first calculated the acceleration induced by a transverse force and found that it was NOT F/M.

Most analogies about relativity are fundamentally bad ideas because they explicitly break the fundamental basis of relativity, which is that intrinsic velocity, if it exists, cannot be measured. The mass of an object is what we would measure in the frame of reference of an object. It has to be invariant with velocity - a so called ‘scalar’. The orbits of the planets around the sun, for example, cannot depend on the sun’s motion through space (else we could use the orbits to measure the sun’s intrinsic velocity).

Most analogies have limits and are useful only inside those limits. The limit of this particular analogy is to simplify a single question …

If I apply an external force F along the line of motion of an object with velocity v, what is the acceleration?

… and that is it. The mass does not really increase. Because of this, the concept of relativistic mass has been discarded by pretty much everyone because it is invariably applied outside its domain of applicability.

E imperativo “ora” andare oltre i nostri limiti antropologici, tramite una stazione eretta mentale, che ho chiamato coscienza evolutiva cosciente PaleontoLogicaMente ISOCIC. Occorre uscire da sotto le sottane di Einstein e finire il lavoro da lui coraggiosamente iniziato ma lasciato incompiuto.

Come ho più volte commentato cercando di attirare l'attenzione dell'inconscio, essere inconsci, quindi soprannominati inCoScientists, è giunto il momento di fare un passo avanti - in avanti evolutivo - rispetto al "pensiero più felice" di Einstein.

Che fa collassare la formazione d’onda della dualità realtà/particelle è l'interferenza della stessa “misurazione cosciente” che assurdamente non vuole tenere conto di se stessa. Questo può essere fatto "semplicemente" accettando la relatività senza distinzione tra massa inerziale e accelerata in un'ipersfera dell'universo "infinitaMente accelerato" come è ora accettato in cui qualsiasi raggio ha lo stesso numero di punti prima di qualsiasi osservatore inerziale "tutto su tutto" coscientemente cosciente istantaneamente impigliato "  causando” il collasso della formazione delle onde della realtà.

Viktor T.Toth su Quora

Qual è il modo più semplice e facile da capire per spiegare come la massa aumenta con la velocità?

Il modo più semplice: la massa non aumenta con la velocità.

Sul serio.  La massa non aumenta con la velocità.

Quando ti muovi rispetto a un oggetto (ricorda: il movimento è sempre relativo, quindi un oggetto che si muove rispetto a te o tu che ti muovi rispetto a quell'oggetto significa letteralmente la stessa cosa) quell'oggetto non cambia.  Non sa nemmeno che ti stai muovendo rispetto ad esso.  Tuttavia, nel tuo sistema di riferimento, è quell'oggetto che si muove e, di conseguenza, ha energia cinetica calcolata da te.  (Per un altro osservatore, muovendosi insieme all'oggetto, l'oggetto è fermo e ha energia cinetica zero.)

Alcuni autori, specialmente nella letteratura più antica, combinarono questa energia cinetica e l'energia massa a riposo dell'oggetto in una quantità chiamata massa relativistica.


Questa quantità è priva di significato.  Differisce per diversi osservatori che si muovono a velocità diverse rispetto all'oggetto.  Non ha davvero alcuna utilità pratica.  Confonde solo le persone, piuttosto gravemente, sulla teoria della relatività.


Geoffrey Edwards su Quora


All'aumentare della velocità, la massa dell'oggetto aumenta in modo lineare fino a quando è necessaria un'energia infinita per spostare una massa infinita.  La dilatazione del tempo è il risultato del campo gravitazionale generato dalla massa dell'oggetto?

No. La massa non aumenta.  La quantità di moto di un oggetto aumenta con la velocità in questo modo:

p = \gamma*m*v

dove p è la solita lettera per la quantità di moto e \gamma è il fattore gamma relativistico.  All'inizio, le persone hanno notato che potevi assorbire la gamma nella m, chiamarla "massa relativistica" (M = gamma*m) e recuperare la solita relazione newtoniana:

p = Mv

Inoltre, questa massa aveva la solita proprietà che se si spingeva sull'oggetto lungo la direzione del moto con forza F si otteneva un'accelerazione a = F/M.  Tuttavia, questa particolare analogia probabilmente iniziò a scomparire quando le persone calcolarono per la prima volta l'accelerazione indotta da una forza trasversale e scoprirono che NON era F/M.

La maggior parte delle analogie sulla relatività sono fondamentalmente cattive idee perché rompono esplicitamente la base fondamentale della relatività, che è che la velocità intrinseca, se esiste, non può essere misurata.  La massa di un oggetto è ciò che misureremmo nel quadro di riferimento di un oggetto.  Deve essere invariante con la velocità - un cosiddetto "scalare".  Le orbite dei pianeti attorno al sole, ad esempio, non possono dipendere dal movimento del sole nello spazio (altrimenti potremmo usare le orbite per misurare la velocità intrinseca del sole).

La maggior parte delle analogie ha dei limiti e sono utili solo all'interno di quei limiti.  Il limite di questa particolare analogia è semplificare una sola domanda...

Se applico una forza esterna F lungo la linea di movimento di un oggetto con velocità v, qual è l'accelerazione?

... e basta.  La massa non aumenta davvero.  Per questo motivo, il concetto di massa relativistica è stato scartato praticamente da tutti perché è invariabilmente applicato al di fuori del suo dominio di applicabilità.

This technical note describes a simple mathematical-geometrical solution for unifying the four fundamental forces in nature. The fundamental forces of gravitation, electromagnetism, strong force, and the weak force are actually different aspects of the same force. In general, the relationship between the four forces can be described using a form of the equation for Analog Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (Analog-QAM). This equation form is developed utilizing the concept of a “blinking” or discrete physical universe. The approach to develop the solution is described by minimizing the number of available dimensions (zero), which is in contrast to numerous efforts (String theory, M-theory, Quantum gravity) that attempt to maximize the number of  dimensions under consideration. An Electrical Universe (EU) model is presented that provides sufficient conditions for a solution. This mathematical solution should be tested against experimental data to confirm its validity, however it is noted that, “discrete-time” forces will be measured differently than “time-averaged” forces in a laboratory environment.

Confirmation of the theory is suggested through small, discrete-time interval measurements of the gravitational acceleration force and the Electromagnetic Force, where they will be seen to vary continuously, and yet also retain a “time-averaged” value. Each reader must comprehend that our entire universe literally blinks, off and on, more than 1 trillion times every second.

Free or low-cost Author's ebooks on: RLighthouse.com, Amazon.com, Vixra.org, Lulu.com, BarnesandNoble, Google Play, Kobo, Scribd, AngusRobertson, Rakuten.jp, Fnac, Draft2Digital, and other websites.

Another recent paper 'Mach's Principle and its connection with Inertia, Gravitation and Dark Matter' described how dark matter is more likely to be a gravitational effect rather than brought about by a halo of dark particles surrounding spiral galaxies on the assumption that the universe is closed and finite. The paper further explored the connection between Mach's principle and inertia to give a rationale for the operation of gravitation provided that this closed universe is expanding, and mentioned that this would also provide a basis of explanation for the passage of time and also a  possible function for the existence of black holes. The latter two issues were not described but are now covered in this follow up paper.

With reference to Wheeler and Feynman's Absorber theory,  an assumption is made that the rim of the resulting bounded and spherical universe is expanding at light speed which mediates the behaviour of all EM radiation within to duplicate the action of the singular rim. For the latter, time will not exist  at light speed but time will start to increase from zero the further within the sphere. The resulting conclusion is that the passage of time within the universe is governed by and directly related to the rate of its expansion. Speculation is made of the possible function of black holes in their possible capacity for storage of mass/energy to control the rate of expansion of the universe and hence the passing of time.

In 1978 I proposed the biocosmological thesis that the form of life's origin and evolution is a cosmological interactive process defined in the cosmic symmetry-breaking at the origin of the universe. With the passage of time, the pendulum has shifted from the improbability of life as a random molecular accident to an awareness that central biomolecules may be cosmologically abundant products of the clouds forming young stars leading to an RNA-era in which both catalysis and replication emerged from one cosmologically derived molecule RNA. This paper unveils the non-linear quantum foundations of biocosmology as the founding science of life.

Dans la théorie du “réseau cosmologique” qui est présentée dans ce livre, le problème de l’unification des théories physiques et de la recherche d’une Théorie du Tout est traité d’une manière radicalement différente des autres approches de la littérature. Au lieu d’essayer de construire une théorie unifiée en bricolant un assemblage de théories existantes, en les rendant de plus en plus complexes et ésotériques, en ajoutant même d’étranges symétries et des dimensions supplémentaires pour leur “beauté mathématique”, on part exclusivement des concepts classiques les plus fondamentaux de la physique, qui sont l’équation de Newton et les deux premiers principes de la thermodynamique. Et à l’aide de ces principes fondamentaux, et en développant une géométrie originale basée sur les coordonnées d’Euler, on en vient, par un cheminement purement logique et déductif, à suggérer que l’Univers pourrait être un cristal, un réseau cubique tridimensionnel élastique et massif, et que les éléments constitutifs de la Matière Ordinaire pourraient être des singularités topologiques de ce réseau cristallin. Sur la base de ce concept original, on peut développer une description très complète de l’évolution spatio-temporelle de ce réseau cubique solide, que l’on appelle le “réseau cosmologique”, en introduisant dans un espace absolu infini un observateur purement imaginaire appelé le Grand Observateur GO. Si cet observateur est équipé d’un système de référence composé d’un référentiel euclidien absolu orthonormé pour localiser les points du réseau solide et d’une horloge absolue pour mesurer l’évolution temporelle du réseau solide dans l’espace absolu, une description très détaillée de l’évolution spatio-temporelle du réseau peut être élaborée sur la base du système de coordonnées d’Euler. Dans ce système de coordonnées, le Grand Observateur GO peut décrire de manière très détaillée les distorsions (rotations et déformations) et les contorsions (flexion et torsion) du réseau. En introduisant les principes physiques de base de la dynamique newtonienne et des deux principes de la thermodynamique, il est capable de décrire l’évolution spatio-temporelle du réseau cosmologique, en lui attribuant une masse d’inertie par cellules de base et une énergie interne spécifique de distorsion par unité de volume du réseau. Et il peut également introduire des singularités topologiques (dislocations, désinclinaisons et dispirations) sous forme de boucles fermées dans ce réseau cosmologique, en tant qu’éléments constitutifs de la matière ordinaire. Lorsque cette idée originale est développée en détail, il peut être démontré, par un cheminement mathématique purement logique et déductif, que, pour un réseau isotrope élastique satisfaisant à la loi de Newton, avec des hypothèses spécifiques sur ses propriétés élastiques, le comportement de ce réseau et ses singularités topologiques satisfont “toute” la physique actuellement connue, en faisant spontanément ressortir des analogies très fortes et souvent parfaites avec toutes les grandes théories physiques actuelles du macrocosme et du microcosme, telles que les équations de Maxwell, la relativité spéciale, la gravitation newtonienne, la relativité générale, la cosmologie moderne et la physique quantique. Mais cette théorie ne se contente pas de trouver des analogies avec les autres théories de la physique, elle propose également des explications assez originales, nouvelles et simples à de nombreux phénomènes physiques qui sont encore assez obscurs et mal compris à l’heure actuelle par la physique, comme la signification profonde et l’interprétation physique de l’expansion cosmologique, l’électromagnétisme, la relativité spéciale, la relativité générale, la physique quantique et le spin des particules. Il offre également des explications nouvelles et simples de la décohérence quantique (la limite de passage entre un comportement classique et un comportement quantique d’un objet), de l’énergie sombre, de la matière noire, des trous noirs, et de nombreux autres phénomènes. Le développement détaillé de cette théorie conduit également à des idées et des prédictions très innovantes, parmi lesquelles la plus importante est l’apparition de la charge de courbure, qui est une conséquence inévitable du traitement d’un réseau solide et de ses singularités topologiques en coordonnées d’Euler. Ce concept n’apparaît pas du tout dans toutes les théories modernes de la physique, telles que la relativité générale, la physique quantique ou le modèle standard, alors que dans notre théorie, ce concept fournit des explications pour de nombreux points obscurs de ces théories, tels que la force faible, l’asymétrie matière-antimatière, la formation des galaxies, la ségrégation entre matière et antimatière au sein des galaxies, la formation de trous noirs gigantesques au cœur des galaxies, la disparition apparente de l’antimatière dans l’Univers, la formation d’étoiles à neutrons, le concept de matière noire, la nature bosonique ou fermionique des particules, etc. Enfin, l’étude de réseaux présentant des symétries spéciales appelées symétries axiales, symboliquement représentées par des réseaux cubiques 3D “colorés”, nous permet d’identifier une étonnante structure de réseau dont les singularités topologiques bouclées coïncident parfaitement avec la zoologie complexe de toutes les particules élémentaires du Modèle Standard, et qui nous permet également de trouver des explications physiques simples aux forces faibles et fortes du Modèle Standard, y compris les phénomènes de confinement et de liberté asymptotique.

Niniejsza praca zestawia klasycznie rozumiane pojęcie "nicości" i "niebytu" ze współczesną koncepcją z zakresu fizyki i kosmologii, zgodnie z którą Wszechświat mógł powstać z niczego. W pierwszej części pracy przywołane zostają filozoficzne definicje teoretycznie przesądzające o niemożności powstania czegoś z niczego. W kontraście do nich druga część pracy skrótowo przedstawia dokonany przez uznanego fizyka wywód odnoszący się do wspomnianej koncepcji naukowej. Chociaż zagadnienia z za-kresu teorii względności i mechaniki kwantowej nie są zrozumiałe bez należytego przygotowania pojęciowego, autor niniejszej pracy stara się je omówić w sposób przystępny, nie tracąc jednocześnie ich kluczowego znaczenia dla omawianej kwestii. W końcowej części pracy pojawia się propozycja rozdzielenia terminów "nic" i "niebyt" odpowiednio pomiędzy nauki przyrodnicze i filozofię, co jest uzasadnione zarówno intuicjami potocznego ich rozumienia, jak i sposobem posługiwania się nimi przez strony tego sporu o "nic".

La cosmología es una de las ciencias más jóvenes de la naturaleza, aunque sus ideas filosófi-cas sean muy antiguas. El tiempo juega un papel singular en cosmología, que involucra ideas antiguas (el tiempo universal) y muy modernas (el tiempo depende del Sistema de Referencia). Se examina el papel que todas estas ideas juegan en crear la noción de tiempo cosmológico, se intenta aclarar las ambigüedades asociadas con el tiempo en un contexto cosmológico y se examina su relación con las nociones de cambio cosmológico.

This essay lays out a hypothesis – based on pure number and geometry – of how number itself forms a mathematical structure that matches our physical reality. Collectively, these offers of evidence comprise what could be viewed as a few pieces in a multidimensional jigsaw puzzle of a unifying field. Number could be the long-sought essence manifesting as gravity, electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear forces, and matter. Number is the zipper connecting time with space, and itself generates the so-called Imperial foot and mile, which embody what NASA calls 'the spacetime vortex' of our Earth, Moon, Sun and beyond.

The knowledge regarding the biological basis of human behaviour has grown explosively in recent years. We know that feelings and emotions are based on biochemical substances, and we know that our behaviour is largely controlled by neurotransmitters in our brain and limbic system.
It is time to translate the update of the modern life sciences into social interventions. “How to Change our Human Nature” shows that biological intervention, and these methods give more insight into human behaviour and offer new solutions for behavioural problems.

Part 1 discusses how biochemical processes work and how they are the foundation of human behaviour. You see how easily the delicate biochemical balance can be disrupted and can lead to uninhibited behaviour and behavioural problems.
Part 2 examines the possibilities that we have to intervene in behaviour by regulating our biochemical housekeeping: our neurotransmitters and hormones.

Ruud Loeffen was a lecturer at Zuyd University as part of the Social Studies faculty until 2009.

Via decrement of mass of planets, we can send the entire planets to far space orbital allocations. We can convert physical matter into energy, it can either get irradiated to outer space, get transmitted back to Earth's potential energy, get used as a self-propellant, or it can get used in a complex model of these systems; it decreases the mass of the planet. By conversion of the matter to energy, Earth will lose some mass that decreases the gravitational fields for Earth; the formulas of the current research are deduced to control the movements of the planets. Celestial bodies, like any other mechanical systems which follow, and are based on, the physical laws of mechanics and dynamical systems, follow these laws. So since the celestial object “A” exerts the “F” force on the celestial object “B”, the celestial object “B” exerts an interactive force “F” on the celestial object “A” also. All celestial objects exert gravitational influences on each other. Scientists believe, once upon a time, the Sun would be much hotter than what it is today. By that point, this high temperature leads to extinction of the entire existence of life on Earth. When the gravitational force changes, a space particle may either get departed from the other particle or come closer to the other particle.

A quantum mechanical formulation of de Sitter cosmological spacetimes still eludes string theory. In this paper we conjecture a potentially rigorous framework in which the status of de Sitter space is the same as that of a resonance in a scattering process. We conjecture that transition amplitudes between certain states with asymptotically supersymmetric flat vacua contain resonant poles characteristic meta-stable intermediate states. A calculation employing constrained instantons illustrates this idea.

Venus – A Young Earth
© John Ackerman
November 2017
Abstract
Overwhelming physical evidence has been present for thirty-seven years that Venus is a hot new planet, born from an impact on the solid, highly deuterated, methane gas hydrate Jupiter 6,000 years BP. Impacts of large bodies on Jupiter trigger enormous nuclear fusion explosions which eject the full range of atoms in their known relative abundances, forming the terrestrial planets. Due to the great heat of these explosive ejections the atoms are reduced to a plasma comprising electrons, protons and neutrons, from which similar abundances quickly reformed, but with the nuclear decay clocks of radioactive elements reset to zero, producing the primordial isotope ratios of argon and hydrogen found on proto-Venus.
Venus today demonstrates that the heavy elements quickly condensed to form what will become the mantle of a complete terrestrial planet. Its current circular orbit is the result of multiple close encounters with Mars and Earth, raising the Tharsis Bulge and the Himalayas, and on Venus uplifting Aphrodite and Ishtar Terra, which display no volcanic calderas. The interior is completely molten with a thin basalt layer less than two kilometers thick floating on top, evidenced by its lack of rotation. Proto-Venus’ enormous internal heat is manifested by raw incandescent lava, > 2000º C, lying in myriads of cracks in the surface, fleeting views of which by the Pioneer Venus Large Probe Infrared Radiometer produced high intensity erratic signals dismissed as window heater faults.
Up-welling vs down-welling radiation measurements from five independent Pioneer Venus probes all agree that proto-Venus is radiating 20 watts per square meter, 250 times more energy than the Earth. Integral to the cooling process, the primary transfer of heat from the surface to the lower cloud layer is accomplished by the high velocity jetting of sulfur gases from more than one million ‘small domes’ directly to 48 km altitude where S8 crystalizes in three forms comprising the lower cloud layer. This unique, 2 km thick, roiling, mixed-phase stratiform cloud layer is the most ubiquitous atmospheric feature on the planet. Sulfur compounds raining back onto the surface evaporate, controlling the surface temperature.
The massive lower atmosphere, primarily sulfur, SN, and CS, currently mistaken for CO2, capped by the lower cloud layer are the source of the high surface pressure, 92 bars. This layer will settle to the surface of the planet as it cools, adding to the existing mantle. The temperature and pressure immediately above the lower cloud layer are similar to those at the surface of the Earth. The volatile elements currently found above the lower cloud layer represent a tiny fraction of the total produced by the 6,000 year (BP) impact explosion on Jupiter, the remainder of which orbit invisibly in the inner solar system awaiting capture. These will form the lithosphere, crust, oceans, atmosphere, flora and fauna of a new terrestrial planet.
A relatively simple, inexpensive, mission to verify this hypothesis is proposed. Two probes, for redundancy, would be released from an orbiter (or even a flyby), each carrying visible light cameras which would photograph the surface of Venus once they descend below the opaque lower cloud layer and the red haze to ~30 km altitude, where temperature and pressure are not severe. Another camera would be used to photograph microscopic images of
Venus – A Young Earth 2 / 21 J Ackerman
sulfur crystals collected on cool glass plates as the probes fell through the lower cloud layer. The images would be transmitted to the bus and back to the Earth.

One of the greatest challenges in physics is to figure out what happened to the anti-matter from the “big bang”. The hot and dense emergent universe should have been seething with particle-antiparticle pairs in equal amounts. Yet, anti-matter is scarce in our universe. This paper explores an alternate path of thought to explain away the most significant asymmetry in a universe which seems to always favor symmetry. The proposed idea is that existential asymmetries such as Baryon asymmetry are ascribed to the existence of 2 universes spawned simultaneously as a “particle pair”, of which, we can only be physically aware of our own.

It is argued that the components of the superposed wave function of a measuring device, each of which represents a definite measurement result, do not correspond to many worlds, one of which is our world, as assumed by the many-worlds interpretation, because all components of the wave function can be observed in our world by protective measurement, and they all exist in this world.

This paper summarizes how a new approach to the Universe based on the existence of a "crystalline ether", which has recently been detailed in the third versions of two books [1], makes it possible to find a simple, unified and coherent explanation of all the theories of modern physics and of the Universe. The basic concepts of this approach can be summarized as follows: (i) the support of the Universe is a form of "crystalline ether" which consists of a solid and massive lattice, of facecentered cubic structure, with the simplest possible elasticity, and in which matter is represented by the set of topological singularities of this lattice (loops of dislocations, disinclinations and dispirations), and (ii) this lattice exclusively satisfies, in absolute space, the basic classical physical concepts that are Newton's law and the two principles of thermodynamics. With these basic classical concepts alone, we show that it is possible to find all the modern theories of physics, namely that the behaviors of this lattice (the Universe) and its topological singularities (the Matter) satisfy electromagnetism, special relativity, general relativity, gravitation, quantum physics, cosmology and even the standard model of elementary particles.

Lectures in the history of culture and civilization, urban culture, culturology, docu mentation science and cross courses in archaeology and heritage. His studies on the geometry of liquids and stationary waves have led to the elaboration of his own theory-The Universality of SphereVortex Principle and have been published in several editions. , , "As works of art, the drawings of Gabriel Kelemen have an exquisite aesthetic quality. They are beautiful in themselves as language, technique, composition and dynamics. Their symbolism aims the mystical."
Carol David, Professor at the West University of Timisoara, Faculty of Arts and Design.

Applying the Copernicus Constant K  to our expanding Universe we can get many interesting results , the Mach’s principle is embedded in our theory. Two problems of cosmological constant can be resolved naturally. The cosmological constant is determined by kinematics of de Sitter spacetime. 
          Λ  =  3*c^2/R^2 = 3*c^2*K^2/lp^2  = 3*Ho*Ho     
It is wonderful that a connection  between the Holographic Principle and our theory can be made through the Copernicus constant K . By that way we get the N bound number  (number of bits, number of  degrees of  freedom) for our universe as following
1/K^2 = 10^124 / 137.03599914
          = 7.2973525663 * 10^121
The question in the Solvay 23rd conference by
prof. Joseph  Polchinski has got an answer.
Vacuum energy density = 9*K^2 /32π * planck density
Exp(283) = 32π/(9*K^2)
It is wonderful that  the mass of  proton  can be calculated as following
Mass proton  =  (243/32π)^1/6 *g*αs*mp*K^1/3
Where g is nucleon meson  coupling,  αs  is  effective strong interactive  constant,  mp is planck mass.
It means  some properties of elementary particles  are related to global structure of  observable universe.
The discovery of neutrino oscillations has proven that neutrinos have a non-zero mass. We suggest a formulas for neutrino as following
Mass neutrino  =  (243/32π)^1/6 *ge*αw*mp*K^1/3       
By that way  a connection between strong, electromagnetic and weak interactions is found out.
It is interesting that multiplying  masses of proton, pion and electron tells  us how bis is our gravitational boundary universe
hn^2/ (G*proton*pion*electron) =  1,62* R Hubble
=  lp / (243/32π)^1/2 *K*gp*gm*α

A superluminal quantum-vortex model of the electron and the positron is produced from a superluminal double-helix model of the photon during electron-positron pair production. The two oppositely-charged (with Q = ±e sqrt (2/α) = 16.6e) open-helix spin-½ half-photons compose the double-helix photon. These half-photons separate and curl up their separated superluminal single-helical trajectories to form an electrically-charged superluminal closed-helix spin-½ quantum-vortex electron model and a corresponding positron model. The helical radius and the Dirac equation's zitterbewegung angular frequency of the quantum vortex electron and positron models equal the helical radius and zitterbewegung angular frequency of the two spin-½ half-photons, each of energy E = mc^2 , that composed the double-helix photon model of energy E = 2mc^2 from which the electron and positron models were produced. The photon and electron models are also compatible when a photon of energy E > 2mc^2 produces a relativistic electron-positron pair. Implications of the quantum vortex electron model for electron stability are discussed.