THPSfan

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tony Hawk's Underground, you may be blocked from editing. If you believe that the information presented in the article is incorrect, please provide a source for the information you are adding/changing. This is not optional. Sirocco745 (talk) 08:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I was on the development team. I know my edits are 100% accurate. I’m not sure why they are being reverted. THPSfan (talk) 09:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

When making any edits on Wikipedia, but particularly to sections concerning living people, you must always source your edits. You hadn't given any reason for your changes via the edit summary, nor had you tried to communicate the reason for your edits when they were reverted. A quick tip for when stuff gets reverted on Wikipedia: don't just mentally ask yourself "why did that happen?" when you can just as easily ask the person responsible for the revert.

In any case, there are a few reasons as to why I reverted your edits. As explained above, the first reason is the information didn't have a source for it. Second, you're a new account. I know that all editors deserve to be treated with good faith, but when you have a username such as THPSfan as well, it immediately leads other users (such as myself) to think you have a conflict of interest. To quote from the first sentence of the policy: "Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships."

Thirdly, TheDeviantPro made an attempt to tell you why your edits were being reverted here. What they said was "This is not accurate as some of them are not even leads on the game, which we only include the leads. Also D'Amato is a Associate Producer which we also not include as per template documentation". You ignored this and proceeded to continue your reverting spree.

Don't get me wrong, any contribution made in good faith to keep Wikipedia factually correct and neutral is appreciated. However, there are policies and rules in place to be followed. Maybe a Level 3 Warning was a bit too far of a jump, but I made that decision based on the limited evidence available to me. Sirocco745 (talk) 09:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. TheDeviantPro (talk) 09:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:14, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply