TheDeviantPro

Bill Thompson didn't voice "minor characters" in Peter Pan, he voiced Mr. Smee, so he deserves to have a place along with the other major actors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.12.79.41 (talk) 08:17, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Why did you revert my post about Asuka winning the 2020 MITB match and becoming RAW champ? This post was originally done by myself and edited for no reason what so ever by someone else so i put it back to the original content. There was NO need for you to revert it back. Please leave it alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23limegreen (talk • contribs) 03:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

You edit was poorly written featured unnecessary capitalisation such as "RAW Women's Championship" and "monday night RAW". Your edit was improved by other editors including myself to make it more readable and then you reverted back to your poorly written edit. Also once you edit wikipedia and then anyone can improve, change or remove any content that you written. You can't own content on wikipedia. TheDeviantPro (talk) 04:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to WrestleMania 33, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. This information is well sourced and meets the verifiability policy. -- Dane ^talk 01:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --JDC808 ♫ 08:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please stop edit warring. Please instead discuss the issue on Talk:Wolf Children. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked. Thanks! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 02:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello there, I noticed you re-nominated the Eian Beron article for speedy deletion. According to Wikipedia rules, an article is either eligible for speedy deletion or it is not. Once an admin makes that decision, you should not add the tag again. If you disagree with a page, you are free to open another deletion discussion. However it's generally frowned upon doing this again so quickly before giving editors the chance to improve the article. I invite you to help me improve the article, however please don't add tags when they are not appropriate. Thank you! JediLuke16 (talk) 13:00, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Per the Template:Video_game_reviews , Eurogamer is very popular and influential, and should be a core part of any reception section. Please refrain from removing this and other sites in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.112.191 (talk) 18:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring on T7. Eurogamer is recommended per the template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.149.110.137 (talk) 05:57, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

You been asked to take it the talk page, you the one is edit warring here. Your edits have be remove by three editors and you yet still keep adding it back. TheDeviantPro (talk) 06:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

You should have reverted my edit on that Rockstar Game as a "Good Faith" edit, because I gave a reason if anybody wanted to revert it back.

Thanks. LTPofficial

Hi, I wanted to say that we know that MITB matches are no disqualification matches but, this is the rule that there should be no Ringside Manager involvement and interferences in this match, James Ellsworth is a male involved in female's match which he should not get involve as he done by climbing a ladder to making her win a match, and this is the no way of winning a match, winner can be consider when a competitor without a manager's interference and involvements climb a ladder and gets a briefcase by his or her ownself not by assisting their ringside assistants. so in this match, no one is winner, no one is disqualified. rematch has been declared for this week's 27th of june 2017 by GM Daniel Bryan. --Broken nutshell (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Like I said Money in the Bank matches have no disqualification, meaning outside interfere can happen. Mangers have gotten involved in Money in the Bank matches before, so this isn't the first time when a manager gotten involved in the match. Also there's no rule that says that a wrestler can't win the match because their manager interfered. The winner is decided when the first participate holds the briefcase unhooked since Ellsworth wasn't a participate and Carmella was the first participate to hold the briefcase unhooked then she was named the winner. Bryan stripped Carmella of the briefcase because how she won the match. TheDeviantPro (talk) 04:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

But Controversy still going around. He is a man who climed. this was womens only. it's okay if it would be men's but this is womens match.Broken nutshell (talk) 16:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please check out the talk page of this WP article. We have someone who is making threats to have the entire page removed. OldSkool01 (talk) 09:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your suggestion TheDeviantPro Haider Irfan (talk) 03:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why don't you understand that Hell in a cell 2017 will be headlined by kevin owens & shane mcmahon Ashwin.lamba (talk) 11:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

So you have a source that support this? Usually we consider the WWE Championship match is the main event unless this changes at the pay-per-view. TheDeviantPro (talk) 11:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

I actually haven't seen read much in that section about the release on other consoles prior to me editing the amendment to the Switch version, however a quick look over the section shows that the exact date was used the beta announcement. I think ideally that we don't really need to list the date that that was announced either, but regardless it's a different beast. I just think saying "In September 2017" looks better and more profesional than giving an exact date. The latter comes off looking like it was just rushed in and kinda seems very close to Proseline to me, which we should try to avoid as much as possible.

I also disagree with you when you say that the multiplayer being included in the download would be a common sense issue: Given that it's an optional download, and is essentially downloadable content, it's not obvious.

I don't really want to get into an edit war over this, especially given that these issues are relatively minor, but I would like us to come to a compromise over this. --Deathawk (talk) 05:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lately you've been removing all traces of the Japanese ports of the games in the Skate franchise, including Skate (video game), Skate It and Skate 3, by removing Famitsu scores and links! You're always acting as if the Japanese ports of games never existed at all! These GameFAQs links are the only proof that the games were ported to Japan, and yet you deny that proof by erasing all Famitsu reviews from American games that were ported to Japan for release! Why? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 17:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Removing Famitsu scores from Japanese ports of American games?. Note that {{Video game reviews}} does not restrict usage of Famitsu. -- ferret (talk) 19:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

I seem to notice that you're attempting to ping users by using @ then their username. Unfortunately, this does not let them know you're getting their attention. To fix this, there's a template you can use to ping others. Try using {{ping}} with the user you want to mention. The full details of how this works is in the template's documentation. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

@TheDeviantPro: I discussed the change on the page’s Talk page. FilmFan’s reasoning was that the Japanese poster should go on the Japanese Wikipedia page.”, even though you can’t post non-free images there. I also told him that many (if not all) of the featured or good anime articles feature the original Japanese poster. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 12:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

As I said on FilmFan talk page that the reason I changed the English to Japanese poster because WP:FILMPOSTER suggests to use the original theatrical poster, which would be the Japanese poster. Most articles of Japanese films on the English wikipedia follow that template guideline therefore the Japanese posters are used instead of the English ones. TheDeviantPro (talk) 13:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

i am not vandalizing wikipedia. The match of Asuka has been confirmed and i just wanted to know how to add a new match. Kindly tell me the procedure Suleiman031 (talk) 11:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Adding a match to the templates of result tables is not appropriate as it change every article that uses that table template. Secondly, there's no match that will feature Asuka that have been confirmed. Just because it says that she will have her main roster debut at TLC doesn't mean that she will be in a match at the PPV, just means she will have appearance at the PPV in some way. TheDeviantPro (talk) 12:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, TheDeviantPro. You have new messages at Talk:Wonder Woman (2017 film).
Message added 04:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Just trying to get some discussion started on the talk page re these recent edits/reverts/hidden comments/deletions/etc. Thought you'd want to know. Thanks. Shearonink (talk) 04:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I have noticed that you use quotes excessively while writing the reception sections of the article South Park: The Fractured But Whole. This is not appropriate and you should consider paraphrasing these quotes. Thanks! AdrianGamer (talk) 12:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wasn't trying to start a fuss, just trying a new idea. It didn't work, so that's that. I'll leave it as is if that's how everyone wants it...no muss, no fuss, no hard feelings. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

removed as irrelevant

how should I add a row in the matches column Suleiman031 (talk) 13:50, 12 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Actually, he is credited as either General Director or Executive Director, so I'd like you to please forgive me for assuming that counts as a director. I have actually looked at the credits before doing so. Also, I don't see him credited as producer on these games either, was this stated somewhere by him? If so, where is the source for that? By looking at the credits, he was the following...

Yakuza 4 - General Director
Yakuza 5 - General Director
Yakuza 0 - Executive Director
Yakuza Kiwami - General Director
Yakuza 6: The Song of Life - Executive Director

So, please do show me that he indeed was even producer on any of these games. Thanks. On Second thought, did the Japanese credits list him as Producer? I’d really like to know.Alaios (talk) 16:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please review Template:Infobox musical artist#instrument. He's mainly known as a singer, everything else is secondary. - FlightTime (open channel) 12:32, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

He's not mainly known as just a singer, he's a multi-instrumentalist. He performs all guitar, keyboards, synthesizers, etc for Nine Inch Nails not just vocals. Template:Infobox musical artist#instrument states "Instruments listed in the infobox should be limited to only those that the artist is primarily known for using" and Reznor is primary known to using vocals, guitar, keyboards and synthesizer in his music not just vocals. TheDeviantPro (talk) 12:44, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hey there.

I had to revert all your edits on the Spyro the Dragon pages.

The reason why is that Sierra Entertainment closed down as a fully-fledged publisher in August of 2004, and VU Games only kept the name as a BRAND, not a publisher. The copyright screens and back covers (depending on the region and console) will list Vivendi Universal Games or Vivendi Games as the publisher instead of Sierra. Luigitehplumber (talk) 00:43, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Sorry for bothering you, but I see you edit Crash-related articles (and e.g. try to fix mistakes with remake/remaster changes). If I am not wrong, the official Crash Bandicoot website (and other official sources) claims the upcoming game’s title as Crash Team Racing Nitro-Fueled (with a hyphen between "Racing" and "Fueled") - source. Shouldn’t we use this form on Wikipedia, too? Thanks for help. Regards, Pinstripelli (talk) 22:35, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NXT TakeOver: Phoenix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hanson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm STATicVapor. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from AEW Double or Nothing. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! StaticVapor message me! 05:54, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to RiceGum does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —DIYeditor (talk) 02:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, would you be able to revert a significant number of edits made by user "XX" on the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Need_for_Speed ? They've made a number of edits, not all of which are "proper" edits IMHO. Since you seem to be one of the folks who mainly look after that article, could you take a look there? Thanks!

MulliganAlpha24 (talk) 01:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

• Done. TheDeviantPro (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi again,

Would you be able to perform another rollback for the NFS article? A user (Neverrainy) came in on May 9th and made a significant number of changes to the article. While some of their rewording was beneficial, the user primarily performed a large amount of disruptive editing (moving main games to spinoffs, deleting spinoffs altogether, tables, etc).

While I understand his willingness to help, he's singlehandedly reclassified multiple mainline titles as spinoffs, without any discussion on the talk page, or regard for sources, other than an arbitrary "belief" on what he considers main or spinoff titles.

Let me know if you have any questions.

MulliganAlpha24 (talk) 01:50, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why did he leave what's going on HassanTheScumbob (talk) 02:02, 19 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Just because certain games are not Japanese doesn’t mean they can’t be published by a Japanese game company in Japan. Dbwasson (talk) 04:13, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Publisher guidelines from Template:Infobox video game is also applied in the article lead. Unless it's the publisher of the developer's or English-language regions. The Japanese or any other region publisher isn't notable for the lead. TheDeviantPro (talk) 06:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Keanu Reeves and Kevin Hart are NOT in Hobbs and Shaw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.152.156.57 (talk) 08:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

My changes were correct on the AEW all out page, as the match graphics clearly say “Winners Advance to ALL OUT for an opportunity at a first round bye in the AEW World Tag Team Championship tournament”, as well as this phrase and the match at All Out being mentioned several times on AEW programming, including Fyter Fest, Fight for the Fallen, and Road To Fight for The Fallen Gw4life729 (talk) 01:33, 14 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

I believe it is appropriate to have it listed on the page, and the reason I believe so is because it does not say "here are the platforms it is on", it just says "The game was released for", and it was indeed released on Steam, that is why I believe it should be on there. I am not trying to start an edit war, or anything like that Qylux (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2019 (UTC)QyluxReply

Like with other video game articles we only list the platforms in lead and never services like Steam as it must reflect the infobox. If we included services in the lead it will become bloated with adding things like Steam, Epic Game Store, PlayStation Store and Xbox Games Store. Like with the other services I mention Steam is a digital distribution storefront not a platform and you can't play the game on any other platforms other than Windows with Steam. Same with the Epic Game Store as you can only play on Windows, PlayStation Store only on PlayStation 4, Xbox Games Store only on Xbox One, ect. So including only Windows, PlayStation 4 and Xbox One for the lead is sufficient enough. TheDeviantPro (talk) 23:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please, don't change the name of the event. Per NJPW, the official name of the event is Wrestle Kingdom in Tokyo Dome. Even if people just say Wrestle Kingdom, it's the WP:OFFICIAL name. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've already gave my reason and it's a valid one. Wrestle Kingdom 14 is the common name as per WP:COMMONNAME, common name usually trumps official name in naming convention. This goes with the other Wrestle Kingdom articles. Your move was a bold one, so I will move the article back again. If you believe we should use the official name then start a move discussion on the talk page rather than make bold moves. Otherwise keep as Wrestle Kingdom 14 as like other Wrestle Kingdom articles. TheDeviantPro (talk) 10:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

I think the worldwide grosses for the SH film might actually be 100.6 million? That's what Box Office Mojo is reporting. Admittedly I don't have a lot of experience interpreting box office numbers, but that's how it reads to me. Do let me know if there's something else I should be looking at. Best, Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 02:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

I uploaded c:File:Talahasse Police Officer with AEW World Championship belt.jpg and I thought that it was normal to insert this photo.--Sismarinho (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

http://www.residentevil2.com/us/about.php

https://www.residentevil.com/re3/us/news/bundle.html

https://www.residentevil.com/3/us/

Here are the official pages from Capcom stating that RE 2 and Re 3 are Re-Imaginings, you cannot get any more official than that. So saying they are remakes would in fact be the incorrect information. If I knew how to cite i would have cited them but i do not use wiki very often and was only fixing incorrect information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.49.120.87 (talk) 03:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

You're not fixing incorrect information, overwhelming sources call them remakes not re-imaginings. Capcom using the word "re-imagining" as a marketing term on their website is not enough of a reason to change it. We must go what majority sources calls them, not just what Capcom calls them. If you still disagree, then discuss on the articles talk page not on my talk page and get consensus to change them but until then they stay as remakes. TheDeviantPro (talk) 01:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I just wanted to drop by because I got a request from Ss112 asking you whether you could update the number-one lists for the Japanese charts from now on? He told me you used to update them for some time and could take over updating them if you have the time to/want to. -- Lk95 18:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please note that BRD applies to you, it does not apply when you're reverting already contested BLP material that is poorly sourced as per this. Please revert yourself or at the very least remove the material sourced to the Forbes piece which is not reliable and I have contested as BRD absolutely does NOT apply to your edits. Praxidicae (talk) 11:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have noticed that you have reverted my edits on the article because you deemed it "unnecessary trivia." It would have been nice if you had sought consensus first. Your "trivia" contains the significance of the games remastered here, shows previous attempts at remasters and gives a brief overview as to why it is a (potential) revival of one of the most significant franchises of its era, as well as containing the last major and independent releases in the franchise. So it is far from trivial. If you compare my section to the one in Final Fantasy VII Remake you will notice it follows a similar structure but contains way less trivia as you call it. If you feel you can improve the section, feel free to do so, but please refrain from undoing my work again.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 12:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

First off, the section you keep adding goes against the Manual of Style and included excessive information. The background subsection in Final Fantasy VII Remake is heavily focus on Remake with a little focus on the original game. Unlike the section you keep adding with have a heavily focus on the original games, the history of the series, the reception of the previous games and other remakes/remaster that were made by different developers, and we already have articles that already covers this information. We can add little background about the original games in development section like in the Final Fantasy VII Remake article but it shouldn't take up an entire section or become the primary focus of the article, the remaster should be the primary focus, nothing else. Finally, you tell me that I the one the consensus but it's YOU who need consensus. Your edits were bold, I reverted and now you need to discuss on talk page, that's how the BRD cycle works not the other way around. TheDeviantPro (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

First of all, you do realize that the guidelines don't forbid articles to have a different sections if necessary, do you? Secondly, if you feel the need to undo other people's work, at least check it properly. The fact that you keep on reverting the "See also" section containing the two previous remakes shows me that you simply abuse the revert tool without giving any actual thought towards other peoples work on the article, and that's not how Wikipedia should work. You could have just moved it to development and shortened it instead of being a dick about this. I will shorten the section and move it to development and hope it is to your liking now.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 11:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi TheDeviantPro,

I noticed this edit from July 20 and the edit summary "Jacob Ports: I'M BACK, THEDEVIANTPRO!!!!!!! YOSHIMITSU'S 2P COSTUME FROM SOUL CALIBUR WAS MEANT TO BE A JOKE!!!!!!". It was reverted right away and the IP has been rangeblocked, but just to be sure I thought I'd share it with you in case you missed it. Kind regards, soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:10, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I did. It's the same user who got blocked several months ago for repeating adding gamecruft to several Need for Speed articles, which I was one the of editors who was reverting their edits. It looks like they got blocked for 1 year for disruptive edits on multiple article. I hope we won't hear from them again. TheDeviantPro (talk) 13:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Alright, I'll try to keep an eye out. Happy editing! soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 14:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

What did i actually do? MkIc (talk) 12:17, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

It is as follows: user 79.101.205.229 had already been warned about continuing to make useless edits in the article List of New Japan Pro-Wrestling personnel and he continued to do so, despite the warnings. Are you going to do something? Because it's already getting boring to deal with this guy. 2804:14C:5B41:8586:BC92:D2DE:2363:FB39 (talk) 15:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

• I'm not a admin, I don't have the power to straight out block him or to protect the article. I've already tried to get the article protected to no avail. So I don't think I can really can do anything other than keep reverting any disrupting edits he makes. TheDeviantPro (talk) 15:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, DeviantPro. As you can see, I had a problem with an user about Matt Taven. An user said we have to come to an agreement, but he doesn't give arguments and didn't answer at one point. You and other user include the content again, but he keeps removing. Since I had a edit warring with him, I think I can't do anything more. Do you have any idea? I would say ANI, but pro wrestling isn't popular between ANI admins. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've made a request to have the article protected due to his edit warring. TheDeviantPro (talk) 16:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

The edit you undid referred to the first celebrity guests in the franchise, not random characters, they should at least be mentioned in a footnote, even if they are only present in certain Asian versions. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 18:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why should they be mentioned? They were, like you said celebrity guests and was only present in the Korean version of the THPS2. They weren't in most versions like the professional skaters or Spider-Man. We don't need to mention every character/guest that were not included in the remaster unless they are worth mentioning like with Spider-Man. TheDeviantPro (talk) 00:50, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

That is not entirely factual. They also feature in various other Asian versions, f.e. the Indonesian one which I happen to own, and I think even in the Australian one. It is only referred to as Korean version as this is the market they were intended for (similar to the Japanese version of THPS3 which is also available in most of Asia). So the footnote could be changed to “several Asian versions“. The group itself is fairly notable, as they were among the top-selling K-Pop groups of their era and, as I explained, the first celebrity entries in the series. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 19:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

They weren't in any Australian release of THPS2, we got the same version that U.S. and UK got. They were only popular in the Korean and some Asian regions, outside those regions they were unknown to the masses. Like I said, unless their exclusion from the remaster is notable; and no I'm not talking about the notability of the group itself; I'm talking about if their exclusion was reported or talked by reliable sources. If not, then I don't think we should included them. There's a few exclusive content from certain versions of THPS2 like levels, secret characters and songs that weren't included in the remaster, mentioning it all will just bloat sections of the article with fancruft and gamecruft. TheDeviantPro (talk) 00:51, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mantr33r (talk) 10:13, 18 January 2021 (UTC) Look, I understand where you're coming from, I DO! But the original Plot is written like absolute trash... It completely glosses over MANY key events and handwaves away 30% of the game in 3 words often. It's not MY fault that the original Plot section is low quality, but I will fix it. And, I told the user MANY MANY times that if he didn't like ONE change I did, that he doesn't undo ALL the changes. Get it?Reply

There are notes in the IWGP Junior Heavyweight title history explaining when the title was defended as a part of the J-Crown. Could there not be something similar for the double title histories? Alternatively, you could get the J-Crown notes removed. Or at least choose the better of the two ways of explaining the dovetailed histories: J-Crown notes say when it began and when it ended; Double title notes just say the title changes were double title matches leaving ambiguity about the successful title defenses. Ping me if you reply. Wanchan2020 (talk) 22:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

God, what a way to act like a total a-hole.

1) The post was made by AN OFFICIAL EA EMPLOYEE if you took a split second to revise it. ALSO FOR F'S SAKE, the same REDDIT post was mentioned in news articles about this situation. 2) The games are now removed from all the stores including Origin and Steam. Good luck using that a citation. There's NO LONGER A "BUY THIS GAME" button on Steam, while many Origin pages return 404 for these games.

Instead of reverting you could MORE RELIABLE SOURCES (which mention the SAME UNRELIABLE REDDIT POST) for F's sake. Oh, god.

Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 09:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

It's not my job to find reliable sources for you, if I find the source you provided questionable and I have every right to revert your edits. The burden is on you to provide reliable sources not me. Also it would help that in your first edits that you explained that it came from a EA employer in the edit summaries rather then writing "FML". TheDeviantPro (talk) 10:07, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please don't accuse me of edit warring when I have initiated a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling and pinged you in said discussion. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

You reverted Donnowin1, going against the manual of style and you then went against WP:BRD by removing them from articles before getting a consensus on a discussion on project's talk page, you just started. Even if it not edit warring (which I apologise), you're going against Wikipedia guidelines. TheDeviantPro (talk) 07:37, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm honestly baffled that people only started caring about that tiny detail of the WP/PW MOS this year to the point that I wasn't even aware it was included on it. I could (and probably will) argue that there was an WP:IMPLIEDCONSENSUS already to not include it. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 07:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fred Rosser Karl Fredricks Tom Lawlor Lio Rush Chris Bey Clark Connors and TJP should be removed from heavyweight and junior heavyweight division and added to strong roster also remove photo of Tom Lawlor from NJPW champions and add it to strong roster 103.203.144.83 (talk) 06:44, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

A-ha played on both dates. Please revert your edit. https://a-ha-live.com/ending-on-a-high-note-farewell-tour-2010/ Mortyman (talk) 01:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please check the table again, they were already in the right place before your edit. Artists that performed in Tokyo on the 7th and in Osaka on the 8th are placed in the left column, artists that performed in Osaka on the 7th and in Tokyo on the 8th are in the right. Your edit make it look like A-ha played in Tokyo and Osaka twice on both days, which didn't happen. So, I won't revert my edit because your edit is not correct. TheDeviantPro (talk) 02:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Just wanted to say thanks for pointing out WP:GAMECRUFT, I somehow missed it in the first edit you did completely but it's really useful. I'll need to make note and pop into Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince / Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix and remove them from there too some time because that's what I based it on as being standard practice. DavefaceFMS (talk) 10:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 in professional wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBD. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NJPW New Years Golden Series, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NJPW New Years Golden Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi - you may be interested in the WT:WikiProject Songs#Cover_songs_that_should_be_split discussion - would appreciate your thoughts. -- DarylKayes (talk) 07:56, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't want to get into an edit war, but I am pretty sure this is the wrong call. It was recognized as an official single for 15 years prior to your (at first) unexplained change to a promotional single in July. Granted, while neither claim is clearly sourced, the burden of proving it was promotional should be on you in light of a long-standing...consensus, of sorts. And you haven't offered any citation. (Not a written one like Wikipedia defines one as, mind you, I just mean the way it's been before the change.) May I have an explanation? I think it should be reverted back to a single, but I'll hear this out. dannymusiceditor ^oops 03:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Both Dookie and Green Day discography articles have She as a radio-only/promotional single, which I changed this article to be in line with those articles. Also how it was "recognized" as an official single when no sources have been provided for the claim and there have been no discussion to determined it's status. Skimming though the edit history, since the article's creation there has been no clear consensus saying "She" was a official single, even at times it was stated that She was a radio-only/promotional single. So saying "It was recognized as an official single for 15 years" is a reach because it wasn't. You're making this sound like I changed some sort of long lasting consensus (according to you), when in reality I didn't because there was no discussion or consensus in any form that says She is a official single. TheDeviantPro (talk) 03:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for bringing the discography to my attention. There's some good thought in making the two consistent. It wasn't like that for a long time, though - it got changed in this September 2021 diff to a promo single by Happyomen, who doesn't appear to be consistently active, though I welcome them to prove me wrong. I want to know what led to that choice - what are we drawing that conclusion from after it had been labeled a single for many years? There's not any discussion of it on the talk page, and the edit summary "promo singles" doesn't really tell me anything. As for why it isn't present on the album, I see that you removed it - while it's definitely valid to remove "singles" from the box on the basis of them being promos, that circles back to the point of I'm not sure this is one. I'm not saying there was a written consensus, I just think it's dubious to change something that's been one way that long when there's not proof to change it, either. It was obviously released in some way aside from the album, but which way isn't clear, and I think we should fall back on a previous, more general choice in such a case. dannymusiceditor ^oops 05:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Addendum: being "radio only" per Dookie was not verified by the source supporting the text. dannymusiceditor ^oops 05:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

If you think that She should be named as an a official single, then go ahead and change it. I don't mind. TheDeviantPro (talk) 23:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @DannyMusicEditor and @TheDeviantPro. Sorry I've been dormant lately. Here are a few quick links that identify "She" as a promo only release: [[1]], [[2]], and [[3]]. Happyomen (talk) 18:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Discogs isn't a reliable source because the info on the website is user edited. TheDeviantPro (talk) 23:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I know this conversation stopped a while ago, but am working on improving Dookie as a whole right now in an effort to repair its FA status it undeservedly holds, and thought there was something worth noting and clarifying somewhere for interested parties. Sometimes Discogs can be usable as proof of visual facts, and this supports the notion "She" was a promo - in the images shown of the disc, something I initially overlooked was that on the disc, in Spanish, it reads "Prohibido su venta", or "Its sale is prohibited". The English message "Not for sale" is usually appended to promo singles, so there's our answer. dannymusiceditor ^oops 06:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I wanted to quickly say thanks for your correction with this edit. I was updating the credits for a number of games and had come across several where someone credited as a co-director was listed, which typically should not be included. Upon reviewing the Tomb raider credits again, it's obvious that the two are credited that way since they both served as game directors, not that they were co-directors for another primary game director.

Super long-winded way of saying "I goofed", and I appreciate you catching it! Sock (tock talk) 12:34, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2023 in professional wrestling

added a link pointing to TBD

G1 Climax

added a link pointing to TBD

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Do not revert GTA articles pretending you own them based on personal views. Just because you feel something is unnessary doesn't make them so, you might seek WP:RfC. either ways for now I am busy and can't get involved in WP:EW but you4r behavior of boldy reverting anyone's edit even when they are supported by WP:RS and WP:V is disturbing and needs WP:ANI review. Maybe when I am free I can look into the matter, right now i just reverted if you want to go WP:EW then fine do it, you do have a history of aggressive editing but i will bring it up when I am free. Just because you feel something is unnessary doesn't make them so, and NEVER act like an artcicle owner and give others the chance to include materials supported by WP:RS. Anyway i will be busy the next few days, if someone gives a WP:Third Opinion I will be fine with it, but your personal views alone and bold reverts can't dictate anything! Dilbaggg (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

TheDeviantPro was doing the right thing. They did not portray any kind of WP:OWNERSHIP, you just made some unnecessary edits and were rightly reverted. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 18:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

None of your edits were back up by any reliable sources, so don't try and claim that. Secondly I barely revert edits which are backed up by actual reliable sources. I do admit that I get bit aggressive but only at editors who repeatedly refuse adhere to guidelines, manual of style, making unsourced changes or adding unreliable sources. Also don't act like you're a saint on here because by looking at your talk page history, I have notice that you have a history of going on a hissy fit with other editors over your own edits. TheDeviantPro (talk) 23:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey TheDeviantPro,

Hope everything is well your side of the world. Concerning your talk page, I'd be more than willing to keep reverting that pesky IP hopping anonymous editor from northern Italy who goes by/went by MySuperBelt85, but maybe you'd like to take some action. WP:UTPROT would make sense to me, at least for some time. If this or another measure is not to your liking, if they pop up in my watch list I'll be sure to revert them again. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 22:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey TheDeviantPro, did you see my message? I just reverted your Italian friend once more. I'd like to know what you'd like to see done. Nothing is also an option of course. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 15:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I did and I'm trying to ignore his trolling efforts on my talk page but it's getting annoying, I would like to get my talk page protected but I not sure how to do it since I never requested my talk page to protected before. TheDeviantPro (talk) 00:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Looks like someone have already protected my talk page, so no action is needed for now. TheDeviantPro (talk) 00:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

You'll have to thank Isabelle Belato for that. Isabelle, with TheDeviantPro's permission, would you mind bumping the edit protection up to indefinite? The pesky troll now has reached out to me and they made it clear they have every intention of continuing their abuse. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 15:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I've upped the protection to 1 year. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 15:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The New Beginning in Nagoya (2024), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Singles match.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, TheDeviantPro. You have new messages at Talk:The Reytons.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

(I would have mentioned you in the original post, but it seems you're the only logged-in editor besides myself and I didn't want to seem like I was calling you out specifically, so I'm just posting Talkback for everyone.) Greatpopcorn (talk) 17:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi!

So I've been looking at a known vandal from the edits they made in Silent Hill f. It looks like Kammajom (will not mention) blanked out their user talk page in attempt to evade a warn. I know logs exist, though I wonder what you, or another admin, would do about this?

Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 00:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Grand Theft Auto VI. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GSK (talk • edits) 16:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't like the carnage you did in the RAGE and Midtown Madness 2 titles. If you ask the technically knowledgeable people on the Midtown Club discord server, they will honestly tell you that the first title using this game engine was Midtown Madness 2. People on this Discord server have reverse-engineered the game code and are still producing various mods. So I'm sorry but Midtown Madness 2 is the foundation of modern RAGE games and that information should be included in the MM2 title. Also, all the changes I made regarding RAGE are sourced. Since Rockstar is a secretive company, I could not find any technical documentation. You can also find this information if you research on GTAForums. RAGE didn't emerge from nothing overnight. It developed over time and AGE was its basis. They just rebranded it and added an R to the beginning. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 11:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry but Discord, GTAFourms and the majority of sources that you added to Rockstar Advanced Game Engine article are not reliable in any way. Also the article already states that it's based on AGE, but does not mean it's necessary the same engine. Secondly, your edits on Midtown Madness 2, added excessive details which bloated the article. TheDeviantPro (talk) 11:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

If I could cite those places as a source, I could, so I said research and find out the truth. Don't be egoistic and prevent people from accessing correct information. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 12:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Start a debate on the talk page and let members decide whether the title should include AGE-related information. You cannot make such a change on your own. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 12:54, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Additionally, considering the technical development it has opened up, we can count RAGE as one of the legacies of Midtown Midness 2. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 12:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

You should have done this in first place, especially after I reverted your bold edits as per WP:BRD. Also calling me egoistic for telling you to provide reliable sources as per Wikipedia guidelines, sounds like a personal attack. TheDeviantPro (talk) 13:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The sources I share are extremely reliable. One of them is a direct Credits section, the other is a website that covers titles developed with the game engine and contains a lot of technical content, and the other one is a source that contains file extensions that refer to the name Angel. You cannot call these sources not reliable. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 13:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes I can as per WP:VG/RS, the only source that was reliable was the Polygon article. TheDeviantPro (talk) 13:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, but you can't limit reliable sources to just gaming magazines. Apart from these, there may be places that contain accurate information. The criterion for their reliability cannot be your individual judgments. If you do this, you will prevent people from accessing the correct information and act egoistically, just to chase the individual contribution score. Let a moderator or other members decide this, not you. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 13:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

This conversation is over. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 13:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply