Value Tensions in OpenStreetMap: Openness, Membership, and Policy in Online Communities
Article No.: 380, Pages 1 - 25
Abstract
The social life and long-term trajectories of online peer production communities are shaped and animated in part by value tensions that arise when distributed, heterogeneous participants are brought together into collaboration. This study of OpenStreetMap (OSM) draws upon values-based approaches to investigate how peer production communities enact their values and navigate tensions between them. We examine how conflicts within the community over the rise of corporate participation in OSM provided a stage for the articulation and enactment of community values, shedding light on the broader dynamics and trajectory of the platform and its participants. The contributions of this work include reflections on how increasing corporate participation in OSM intersects with discourses about the emancipatory potential of emerging mapping technologies, insights into the challenges of scaling membership in peer production communities, and exploring the role of values in understanding the social life and governance of online communities.
Supplemental Material
ZIP File
The supplementary materials contains the qualitative codebook used within the study. The codebook shows initial codes, descriptions, and the final values created through the research process.
- Download
- 81.15 KB
References
[1]
Pär J Ågerfalk and Brian Fitzgerald. 2008. Outsourcing to an unknown workforce: Exploring opensourcing as a global sourcing strategy. MIS quarterly (2008), 385--409.
[2]
Jennings Anderson. 2021. Jennings Anderson's Diary | A 2021 Update on Paid Editing in OpenStreetMap | OpenStreetMap -- openstreetmap.org. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jennings%20Anderson/diary/396271.
[3]
Jennings Anderson, Dipto Sarkar, and Leysia Palen. 2019. Corporate editors in the evolving landscape of OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, Vol. 8, 5 (2019), 232.
[4]
Ofer Arazy, Wayne Morgan, and Raymond Patterson. 2006. Wisdom of the crowds: Decentralized knowledge construction in Wikipedia. In 16th Annual Workshop on Information Technologies & Systems (WITS) Paper.
[5]
Ofer Arazy, Oded Nov, Raymond Patterson, and Lisa Yeo. 2011. Information quality in Wikipedia: The effects of group composition and task conflict. Journal of management information systems (2011), 71--98.
[6]
Michael J Baker, Franccoise Détienne, and Flore Barcellini. 2017. Argumentation and conflict management in online epistemic communities: a narrative approach to Wikipedia debates. Interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional contexts (2017), 141--157.
[7]
Andrea Ballatore and Peter Mooney. 2015. Conceptualising the geographic world: the dimensions of negotiation in crowdsourced cartography. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 29, 12 (2015), 2310--2327.
[8]
Chiara Bassetti, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Peter Lyle, Maurizio Teli, Stefano De Paoli, and Antonella De Angeli. 2019. Co-designing for common values: creating hybrid spaces to nurture autonomous cooperation. CoDesign, Vol. 15, 3 (2019), 256--271.
[9]
Michael Batty. 2019. A map is not the territory, or is it?, 599--602 pages.
[10]
Eric PS Baumer, Jenna Burrell, Morgan G Ames, Jed R Brubaker, and Paul Dourish. 2015. On the importance and implications of studying technology non-use. interactions, Vol. 22, 2 (2015), 52--56.
[11]
Michel Bauwens and Vasilis Niaros. 2017. Value in the commons economy: Developments in open and contributory value accounting. Heinrich Böll Stiftung, P2P Foundation (2017).
[12]
Yochai Benkler and Helen Nissenbaum. 2006. Commons-based peer production and virtue. Journal of political philosophy, Vol. 14, 4 (2006).
[13]
Benjamin J Birkinbine. 2015. Conflict in the commons: Towards a political economy of corporate involvement in free and open source software. The Political Economy of Communication, Vol. 2, 2 (2015).
[14]
Christian Bittner. 2017. OpenStreetMap in Israel and Palestine--?Game changer?or reproducer of contested cartographies? Political Geography, Vol. 57 (2017), 34--48.
[15]
Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign, Vol. 8, 2--3 (2012), 127--144.
[16]
Geoffrey C Bowker. 1994. Science on the run: Information management and industrial geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920--1940. MIT press.
[17]
Geoffrey C Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press.
[18]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, Vol. 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
[19]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, Vol. 11, 4 (2019), 589--597.
[20]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology, Vol. 18, 3 (2021), 328--352.
[21]
Nama Raj Budhathoki. 2010. Participants' motivations to contribute geographic information in an online community. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
[22]
Nama R Budhathoki and Caroline Haythornthwaite. 2013. Motivation for open collaboration: Crowd and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 57, 5 (2013), 548--575.
[23]
Brian Butler, Elisabeth Joyce, and Jacqueline Pike. 2008. Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1101--1110.
[24]
Valentina Carraro. 2021. Jerusalem Online: Critical Cartography for the Digital Age. Springer Nature.
[25]
Steve Chilton. 2009. Crowdsourcing is radically changing the geodata landscape: case study of OpenStreetMap. In Proceedings of the UK 24th international cartography conference, Vol. 6.
[26]
Youjin Choe, Martin Tomko, and Mohsen Kalantari. 2023. Assessing Mapper Conflict in OpenStreetMap Using the Delphi Survey Method. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--17.
[27]
Jeremy W Crampton. 2001. Maps as social constructions: power, communication and visualization. Progress in human Geography, Vol. 25, 2 (2001), 235--252.
[28]
Jeremy W Crampton and Jonh Krygier. 2018. An introduction to critical cartography. (2018).
[29]
Sherae L Daniel, Likoebe M Maruping, Marcelo Cataldo, and Jim Herbsleb. 2018. The impact of ideology misfit on open source software communities and companies. MIS quarterly, Vol. 42, 4 (2018), 1069--A10.
[30]
Maitraye Das, Brent Hecht, and Darren Gergle. 2019. The gendered geography of contributions to OpenStreetMap: Complexities in self-focus bias. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[31]
Digital Democracy. 2017. Seikopai digital participative mapping -- vimeo.com. https://vimeo.com/175900565.
[32]
Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Adversarial design as inquiry and practice. (2012).
[33]
Joseph Donia and James A Shaw. 2021. Ethics and values in design: A structured review and theoretical critique. Science and engineering ethics, Vol. 27, 5 (2021), 57.
[34]
Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT press.
[35]
Pelle Ehn. 1988. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Ph.,D. Dissertation. Arbetslivscentrum.
[36]
Anna Filippova and Hichang Cho. 2016. The effects and antecedents of conflict in free and open source software development. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conf. on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 705--716.
[37]
Brian Fitzgerald. 2006. The transformation of open source software. MIS quarterly (2006), 587--598.
[38]
Mary Flanagan, Daniel C Howe, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2008. Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. na.
[39]
Andrea Forte, Vanesa Larco, and Amy Bruckman. 2009. Decentralization in Wikipedia governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 26, 1 (2009), 49--72.
[40]
Christopher Frauenberger, Marcus Foth, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2018. On scale, dialectics, and affect: Pathways for proliferating participatory design. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conf.: Full Papers-Vol. 1. 1--13.
[41]
Batya Friedman. 1996. Value-sensitive design. interactions, Vol. 3, 6 (1996), 16--23.
[42]
Batya Friedman and David G Hendry. 2019. Value sensitive design: Shaping technology with moral imagination. Mit Press.
[43]
Batya Friedman, Peter Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2002. Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. University of Washington technical report, Vol. 2, 8 (2002), 1--8.
[44]
Batya Friedman, Nancy Levenson, Ben Shneiderman, Lucy Suchman, and Terry Winograd. 1994. Beyond accuracy, reliability, and efficiency: criteria for a good computer system. In Conf. Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 195--198.
[45]
Batya Friedman and Helen Nissenbaum. 1996. Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on information systems (TOIS), Vol. 14, 3 (1996), 330--347.
[46]
Lars Fuglsang and Rolf Rønning. 2015. On innovation patterns and value-tensions in public services. The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 35, 9 (2015), 467--482.
[47]
Juan Mateos Garcia, W Edward Steinmueller, et al. 2003. The open source way of working: A new paradigm for the division of labour in software development'sPRU.
[48]
Bill Gaver and Heather Martin. 2000. Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 209--216.
[49]
William W Gaver, John Bowers, Andrew Boucher, Hans Gellerson, Sarah Pennington, Albrecht Schmidt, Anthony Steed, Nicholas Villars, and Brendan Walker. 2004. The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 885--900.
[50]
R Stuart Geiger and Aaron Halfaker. 2017. Operationalizing conflict and cooperation between automated software agents in wikipedia: A replication and expansion of'even good bots fight'. Proceedings of the ACM on HCI, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--33.
[51]
R Stuart Geiger, Dorothy Howard, and Lilly Irani. 2021. The labor of maintaining and scaling free and open-source software projects. Proceedings of the ACM on HCI, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--28.
[52]
Joe Gerlach. 2010. Vernacular mapping, and the ethics of what comes next., 165--168 pages.
[53]
Matt Germonprez, Julie E Kendall, Kenneth E Kendall, Lars Mathiassen, Brett Young, and Brian Warner. 2017. A theory of responsive design: A field study of corporate engagement with open source communities. Information Systems Research, Vol. 28, 1 (2017), 64--83.
[54]
Matt Germonprez, Georg JP Link, Kevin Lumbard, and Sean Goggins. 2018. Eight observations and 24 research questions about open source projects: illuminating new realities. Proceedings of the ACM on HCI, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--22.
[55]
Michael F Goodchild. 2007. Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. International journal of spatial data infrastructures research, Vol. 2, 2 (2007), 24--32.
[56]
Anja Guzzi, Alberto Bacchelli, Michele Lanza, Martin Pinzger, and Arie Van Deursen. 2013. Communication in open source software development mailing lists. In 2013 10th Working Conf. on Mining Software Repositories (MSR). IEEE, 277--286.
[57]
Muki Haklay, Alex Singleton, and Chris Parker. 2008. Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography compass, Vol. 2, 6 (2008), 2011--2039.
[58]
HOT. [n.,d.]. Open Mapping Hubs -- hotosm.org. https://www.hotosm.org/hubs/ .
[59]
Lara Houston, Steven J Jackson, Daniela K Rosner, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Meg Young, and Laewoo Kang. 2016. Values in repair. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1403--1414.
[60]
Andrew Hudson-Smith, Andrew Crooks, Maurizio Gibin, Richard Milton, and Michael Batty. 2009. NeoGeography and Web 2.0: concepts, tools and applications. Journal of Location Based Services, Vol. 3, 2 (2009), 118--145.
[61]
Ole Sejer Iversen, Kim Halskov, and Tuck W Leong. 2012. Values-led participatory design. CoDesign, Vol. 8, 2--3 (2012), 87--103.
[62]
Steven J Jackson, Tarleton Gillespie, and Sandy Payette. 2014. The policy knot: Re-integrating policy, practice and design in CSCW studies of social computing. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 588--602.
[63]
Nassim JafariNaimi, Lisa Nathan, and Ian Hargraves. 2015. Values as hypotheses: design, inquiry, and the service of values. Design issues, Vol. 31, 4 (2015), 91--104.
[64]
Ruba Jaljolie, Talia Dror, David N Siriba, and Sagi Dalyot. 2023. Evaluating current ethical values of OpenStreetMap using value sensitive design. Geo-Spatial Information Science, Vol. 26, 3 (2023), 362--378.
[65]
Brent Jesiek. 2003. Democratizing software: Open source, the hacker ethic, and beyond. First Monday (2003).
[66]
Peter A Johnson. 2017. Models of direct editing of government spatial data: challenges and constraints to the acceptance of contributed data. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Vol. 44, 2 (2017), 128--138.
[67]
Aniket Kittur and Robert E Kraut. 2008. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 37--46.
[68]
Alfred Korzybski. 1931. A non-Aristotelian system and its necessity for rigour in mathematics and physics.
[69]
Stacey Kuznetsov. 2006. Motivations of contributors to Wikipedia. ACM SIGCAS computers and society, Vol. 36, 2 (2006), 1--es.
[70]
Christopher A Le Dantec, Erika Shehan Poole, and Susan P Wyche. 2009. Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1141--1150.
[71]
Yu-Wei Lin. 2011. A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, Vol. 17, 1 (2011), 53--71.
[72]
Thomas Lodato and Carl DiSalvo. 2018. Institutional constraints: the forms and limits of participatory design in the public realm. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conf.: Full Papers-Vol. 1. 1--12.
[73]
Amanda Menking and Ingrid Erickson. 2015. The heart work of Wikipedia: Gendered, emotional labor in the world's largest online encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 207--210.
[74]
Jessica K Miller, Batya Friedman, Gavin Jancke, and Brian Gill. 2007. Value tensions in design: the value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation's groupware system. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conf. on Supporting Group Work. 281--290.
[75]
Peta Mitchell, Marcus Foth, and Irina Anastasiu. 2021. Geographies of locative apps. In Routledge Handbook of Media Geographies. Routledge, 183--195.
[76]
Peta Mitchell, Marcus Foth, and Markus Rittenbruch. 2023. Digital geographies and the location economy: Towards a transdisciplinary research agenda. A research agenda for digital geographies (2023), 19.
[77]
Peter Mooney, Marco Minghini, et al. 2017. A review of OpenStreetMap data. Mapping and the citizen sensor (2017).
[78]
Mayo Fuster Morell, Jorge L Salcedo, and Marco Berlinguer. 2016. Debate about the concept of value in Commons-Based Peer Production. In Internet Science: Third International Conf., INSCI 2016, Florence, Italy, September 12--14, 2016, Proceedings 3. Springer, 27--41.
[79]
Brahm Norwich. 2014. Recognising value tensions that underlie problems in inclusive education. Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 44, 4 (2014), 495--510.
[80]
Siobhán O'Mahony and Beth A Bechky. 2008. Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative science quarterly, Vol. 53, 3 (2008), 422--459.
[81]
Mathieu O'Neil, Christian Pentzold, and Sophie Toupin. 2021. The handbook of peer production. John Wiley & Sons.
[82]
OpenStreetMap. 2017. Board/Minutes/2017-06--20 - OpenStreetMap Foundation -- wiki.osmfoundation.org. https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board/Minutes/2017-06--20##Corporate_editing_policy_survey.
[83]
OpenStreetMap. 2017. Data Working Group/Results of Organised Editing Survey 2017 - OpenStreetMap Foundation -- wiki.osmfoundation.org. https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group/Results_of_Organised_Editing_Survey_2017.
[84]
OpenStreetMap. 2018. Organised Editing Guidelines - OpenStreetMap Foundation -- wiki.osmfoundation.org. https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.
[85]
OpenStreetMap. 2021. Facebook AI-Assisted Road Tracing - OpenStreetMap Wiki -- wiki.openstreetmap.org. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing&oldid=2115828.
[86]
OpenStreetMap. 2022. Armchair mapping - OpenStreetMap Wiki -- wiki.openstreetmap.org. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Armchair_mapping.
[87]
OpenStreetMap. 2022. Automated Edits code of conduct - OpenStreetMap Wiki -- wiki.openstreetmap.org. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct&oldid=2317711.
[88]
OpenStreetMap. 2022. Rapid - OpenStreetMap Wiki -- wiki.openstreetmap.org. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RapiD&oldid=2328201.
[89]
OpenStreetMap. 2023. Contribute map data - OpenStreetMap Wiki -- wiki.openstreetmap.org. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contribute_map_data.
[90]
OpenStreetMap. n.d a. The osmf-talk Archives -- lists.openstreetmap.org. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/.
[91]
OpenStreetMap. n.d b. The talk Archives -- lists.openstreetmap.org. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/.
[92]
Mathieu O'Neil. 2011. Wikipedia and authority. Lovnik and Tkacz, supra, at, Vol. 309 (2011).
[93]
Leysia Palen, Robert Soden, T Jennings Anderson, and Mario Barrenechea. 2015. Success & scale in a data-producing organization: The socio-technical evolution of OpenStreetMap in response to humanitarian events. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 4113--4122.
[94]
Greg Perkins. 1999. Culture clash and the road to world domination. IEEE software, Vol. 16, 1 (1999), 80--84.
[95]
Stephane Roche, Eliane Propeck-Zimmermann, and Boris Mericskay. 2013. GeoWeb and crisis management: Issues and perspectives of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, Vol. 78 (2013), 21--40.
[96]
Dipto Sarkar and Jennings T Anderson. 2022. Corporate editors in OpenStreetMap: Investigating co-editing patterns. Transactions in GIS, Vol. 26, 4 (2022), 1879--1897.
[97]
Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph'Jofish' Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility. 49--58.
[98]
Toshikazu Seto and Yuichiro Nishimura. 2016. Crisis mapping project and counter-mapping by neo-geographers. Japan after, Vol. 3, 11 (2016), 288--303.
[99]
Renée E Sieber and Mordechai Haklay. 2015. The epistemology (s) of volunteered geographic information: a critique. Geo: Geography and Environment, Vol. 2, 2 (2015), 122--136.
[100]
C Estelle Smith, Bowen Yu, Anjali Srivastava, Aaron Halfaker, Loren Terveen, and Haiyi Zhu. 2020. Keeping community in the loop: Understanding wikipedia stakeholder values for machine learning-based systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[101]
Robert Soden and Leysia Palen. 2014. From crowdsourced mapping to community mapping: The post-earthquake work of OpenStreetMap Haiti. In COOP 2014-Proceedings of the 11th International Conf. on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 27--30 May 2014, Nice (France). Springer, 311--326.
[102]
Robert Soden, Austin Toombs, and Michaelanne Thomas. 2024. Evaluating Interpretive Research in HCI. Interactions (2024).
[103]
Patricia Solís, Jennings Anderson, and Sushil Rajagopalan. 2021. Open geospatial tools for humanitarian data creation, analysis, and learning through the global lens of YouthMappers. Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol. 23 (2021), 599--625.
[104]
Susan Leigh Star. 1990. Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. The Sociological Review, Vol. 38, 1_suppl (1990), 26--56.
[105]
Susan Leigh Star and James R Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology,translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social studies of science, Vol. 19, 3 (1989), 387--420.
[106]
Susan Leigh Star and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information systems Research, Vol. 7, 1 (1996), 111--134.
[107]
Monica Stephens. 2013. Gender and the GeoWeb: divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information. GeoJournal, Vol. 78 (2013), 981--996.
[108]
Lucy Suchman. 1993. Participatory design: Principles and practices. Chapter Forward.
[109]
Nathaniel Tkacz. 2010. Wikipedia and the politics of mass collaboration. PLATFORM: journal of media and communication, Vol. 2, 2 (2010), 40--53.
[110]
Veniamin Veselovsky, Dipto Sarkar, Jennings Anderson, and Robert Soden. 2022. An Automated Approach to Identifying Corporate Editing. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conf. on Web and Social Media, Vol. 16. 1052--1063.
[111]
Richmond Y Wong. 2021. Tactics of Soft Resistance in User Experience Professionals' Values Work. Proceedings of the ACM on HCI, Vol. 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--28.
Index Terms
- Value Tensions in OpenStreetMap: Openness, Membership, and Policy in Online Communities
Recommendations
A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making
Exploring ProdusageBased on a case study on the OpenStreetMap community, this paper provides a contextual and embodied understanding of the user-led, user-participatory and user-generated produsage phenomenon. It employs Grounded Theory, Social Worlds Theory, and ...
The impact of membership overlap on the survival of online communities
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIf the people belong to multiple online communities, their joint membership can influence the survival of each of the communities to which they belong. Communities with many joint memberships may struggle to get enough of their members' time and ...
'Custodian of online communities': how moderator mutual support in communities help fight hate and harassment online
SOUPS '24: Proceedings of the Twentieth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and SecurityVolunteer moderators play a crucial role in safeguarding online communities, actively combating hate, harassment, and inappropriate content while enforcing community standards. Prior studies have examined moderation tools and practices, moderation ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2024
5177 pages
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 08 November 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW2
Check for updates
Badges
Honorable Mention
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 140Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)140
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in