The Algorithm and the Org Chart: How Algorithms Can Conflict with Organizational Structures
Authors: 
Melissa A. Valentine, Amanda L. Pratt, Rebecca Hinds, 
Michael S. BernsteinAuthors Info & Claims
Article No.: 364, Pages 1 - 31
Abstract
Algorithms are introducing changes to individuals? jobs, but do algorithms also lead to changes in the structures of organizations themselves? Organizational structures, as often formalized into organization (org) charts, are meant to facilitate coordinated decision-making. Yet our 10-month ethnographic study of a large online retail company reveals why the organizational structures that facilitate effective decision-making by humans may be in tension with the organizational structures that facilitate effective decision-making using algorithms. Our findings show that the human decision-makers needed small, divided-up sets of decisions, and they had previously accomplished this through how they structured individuals' roles and teams in the org chart. In contrast, when data scientists developed a new algorithm and first deployed it within organizational structures meant to support human decision-making, they realized that these small divided-up decision spaces were arbitrarily constraining the algorithm's search space. When not constrained in this manner, the algorithm could identify and recommend better solutions, but those optimal solutions did not always align with the structure of roles and teams in the org chart. This study suggests that as algorithms are integrated into the workplace, organization designs may begin to more explicitly reflect the contours of those algorithms' behaviors.
References
[1]
Howard E. Aldrich. 1972. Technology and Organizational Structure: A Reexamination of the Findings of the Aston Group. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, 1 (March 1972), 26--43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392089
[2]
Callen Anthony. 2021. When Knowledge Work and Analytical Technologies Collide: The Practices and Consequences of Black Boxing Algorithmic Technologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 66, 4 (Dec. 2021), 1173--1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211016755
[3]
Diane E. Bailey and Stephen R. Barley. 2020. Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies. Information and Organization, Vol. 30, 2 (2020), 100286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100286
[4]
Liam J. Bannon and Kjeld Schmidt. 1989. CSCW - Four Characters in Search of a Context. DAIMI Report Series, Vol. 18, 289 (Sept. 1989). https://doi.org/10.7146/dpb.v18i289.6667
[5]
Stephen R. Barley. 1986. Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 31, 1 (March 1986), 78--108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392767
[6]
Stephen R. Barley. 1990. The Alignment of Technology and Structure through Roles and Networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, 1 (1990), 61--103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393551
[7]
Stephen R. Barley. 2020. Work and Technological Change. OUP Oxford.
[8]
Stephen R. Barley, William H. Dutton, Sara Kiesler, Paul Resnick, Robert E. Kraut, and JoAnne Yates. 2004. Does CSCW need organization theory?. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, Chicago Illinois USA, 122--124. https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031628
[9]
Chester I. Barnard. 1968. The Functions of the Executive 30th anniversary ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Originally published in 1938.
[10]
Nicholas Bloom, Luis Garicano, Raffaella Sadun, and John Van Reenen. 2014. The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization. Management Science, Vol. 60, 12 (Dec. 2014), 2859--2885. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2013
[11]
Sarah Brayne and Angèle Christin. 2021. Technologies of Crime Prediction: The Reception of Algorithms in Policing and Criminal Courts. Social Problems, Vol. 68, 3 (Aug. 2021), 608--624. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spaa004
[12]
Taina Bucher. 2018. If...Then. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001
[13]
Zana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2021. To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449287
[14]
Ángel Alexander Cabrera, Adam Perer, and Jason I. Hong. 2023. Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, CSCW1 (April 2023), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579612
[15]
Carrie J. Cai, Samantha Winter, David Steiner, Lauren Wilcox, and Michael Terry. 2019. "Hello AI": Uncovering the Onboarding Needs of Medical Practitioners for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359206
[16]
Shiye Cao and Chien-Ming Huang. 2022. Understanding User Reliance on AI in Assisted Decision-Making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555572
[17]
Lingwei Cheng and Alexandra Chouldechova. 2022. Heterogeneity in Algorithm-Assisted Decision-Making: A Case Study in Child Abuse Hotline Screening. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1--33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555101
[18]
Angele Christin. 2017. Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice. Big Data & Society, Vol. 4, 2 (2017), 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717718855
[19]
Angèle Christin. 2018. Counting Clicks: Quantification and Variation in Web Journalism in the United States and France. Amer. J. Sociology, Vol. 123, 5 (2018), 1382--1415. https://doi.org/10.1086/696137
[20]
Amy C. Edmondson and Stacy E. McManus. 2007. Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, 4 (2007), 1246--1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586086
[21]
Lucca Eloy, Cara Spencer, Emily Doherty, and Leanne Hirshfield. 2023. Capturing the Dynamics of Trust and Team Processes in Human-Human-Agent Teams via Multidimensional Neural Recurrence Analyses. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, CSCW1 (April 2023), 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579598
[22]
Virginia Eubanks. 2017. Automating inequality: how high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor first edition ed.). St. Martin's Press, New York, NY.
[23]
Samer Faraj, Stella Pachidi, and Karla Sayegh. 2018. Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, Vol. 28, 1 (2018), 62--70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005
[24]
Neil Fligstein. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[25]
Asbjørn Ammitzbøll Flügge, Thomas Hildebrandt, and Naja Holten Møller. 2021. Street-Level Algorithms and AI in Bureaucratic Decision-Making: A Caseworker Perspective. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449114
[26]
Asbjørn William Ammitzbøll Flügge, Thomas Hildebrandt, and Naja Holten Møller. 2020. Algorithmic Decision Making in Public Services: A CSCW-Perspective. In Companion of the 2020 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, Sanibel Island Florida USA, 111--114. https://doi.org/10.1145/3323994.3369886
[27]
Riccardo Fogliato, Alexandra Chouldechova, and Zachary Lipton. 2021. The Impact of Algorithmic Risk Assessments on Human Predictions and its Analysis via Crowdsourcing Studies. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479572
[28]
Jay R. Galbraith. 1974. Organization Design: An Information Processing View. Interfaces, Vol. 4, 3 (1974), 28--36. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25059090
[29]
Tarleton Gillespie. 2014. The Relevance of Algorithms. In Media Technologies, Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot (Eds.). The MIT Press, 167--194. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009
[30]
Nina Grgić-Hlača, Christoph Engel, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2019. Human Decision Making with Machine Assistance: An Experiment on Bailing and Jailing. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359280
[31]
Luther Gulick and Lyndall Urwick. 2003. Papers on the Science of Administration 1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203509241 Originally published in 1937.
[32]
Rebecca M. Henderson and Kim B. Clark. 1990. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, 1 (March 1990), 9--30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
[33]
Pamela Hinds and Sara Kiesler. 1995. Communication across Boundaries: Work, Structure, and Use of Communication Technologies in a Large Organization. Organization Science, Vol. 6, 4 (Aug. 1995), 373--393. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.373
[34]
Kenneth Holstein, Maria De-Arteaga, Lakshmi Tumati, and Yanghuidi Cheng. 2023. Toward Supporting Perceptual Complementarity in Human-AI Collaboration via Reflection on Unobservables. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, CSCW1 (April 2023), 1--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579628
[35]
Yoyo Tsung-Yu Hou and Malte F. Jung. 2021. Who is the Expert? Reconciling Algorithm Aversion and Algorithm Appreciation in AI-Supported Decision Making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479864
[36]
Christopher Hutchison. 1994. Patterns of language in organizations: implications for CSCW. In Design Issues in CSCW. Springer, 89--117.
[37]
Katherine C. Kellogg, Melissa A. Valentine, and Angèle Christin. 2020. Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control. Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 14, 1 (2020), 366--410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
[38]
Kalle Kusk and Midas Nouwens. 2022. Platform-Mediated Food Delivery Work: A Review for CSCW. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555645
[39]
Sarah Lebovitz, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, and Natalia Levina. 2022. To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis. Organization Science, Vol. 33, 1 (Jan. 2022), 126--148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1549
[40]
Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Evan Metsky, and Laura Dabbish. 2015. Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Seoul Republic of Korea, 1603--1612. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702548
[41]
Caitlin Lustig and Bonnie Nardi. 2015. Algorithmic Authority: The Case of Bitcoin. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, HI, USA, 743--752. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.95
[42]
Caitlin Lustig, Katie Pine, Bonnie Nardi, Lilly Irani, Min Kyung Lee, Dawn Nafus, and Christian Sandvig. 2016. Algorithmic Authority: the Ethics, Politics, and Economics of Algorithms that Interpret, Decide, and Manage. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 1057--1062. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2886426
[43]
James G. March and Herbert A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.
[44]
Melissa Mazmanian and Christine M. Beckman. 2018. 'Making' Your Numbers: Engendering Organizational Control Through a Ritual of Quantification. Organization Science, Vol. 29, 3 (June 2018), 357--379. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1185
[45]
Henry Mintzberg. 1973. The nature of managerial work. Harper & Row, New York, NY.
[46]
Sauro Mocetti, Marcello Pagnini, and Enrico Sette. 2017. Information Technology and Banking Organization. Journal of Financial Services Research, Vol. 51, 3 (June 2017), 313--338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-016-0244--3
[47]
Lawrence B. Mohr. 1971. Organizational Technology and Organizational Structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 16, 4 (Dec. 1971), 444--459. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391764
[48]
Katelyn Morrison, Donghoon Shin, Kenneth Holstein, and Adam Perer. 2023. Evaluating the Impact of Human Explanation Strategies on Human-AI Visual Decision-Making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, CSCW1 (April 2023), 1--37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579481
[49]
Imani Munyaka, Zahra Ashktorab, Casey Dugan, J. Johnson, and Qian Pan. 2023. Decision Making Strategies and Team Efficacy in Human-AI Teams. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, CSCW1 (April 2023), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579476
[50]
Stella Pachidi, Hans Berends, Samer Faraj, and Marleen Huysman. 2021. Make Way for the Algorithms: Symbolic Actions and Change in a Regime of Knowing. Organization Science, Vol. 32, 1 (Jan. 2021), 18--41. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1377
[51]
Hyanghee Park, Daehwan Ahn, Kartik Hosanagar, and Joonhwan Lee. 2022. Designing Fair AI in Human Resource Management: Understanding Tensions Surrounding Algorithmic Evaluation and Envisioning Stakeholder-Centered Solutions. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517672
[52]
Joon Sung Park, Karrie Karahalios, Niloufar Salehi, and Motahhare Eslami. 2022. Power Dynamics and Value Conflicts in Designing and Maintaining Socio-Technical Algorithmic Processes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CSCW1 (March 2022), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512957
[53]
Sharon K. Parker and Gudela Grote. 2022. Automation, Algorithms, and Beyond: Why Work Design Matters More Than Ever in a Digital World. Applied Psychology, Vol. 71, 4 (Oct. 2022), 1171--1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241
[54]
Roger Penn, Michael Rose, and Jill Rubery (Eds.). 1994. Skill and occupational change. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York.
[55]
Anette C. M. Petersen, Lars Rune Christensen, Richard Harper, and Thomas Hildebrandt. 2021. "We Would Never Write That Down": Classifications of Unemployed and Data Challenges for AI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449176
[56]
Jeffrey Pfeffer and Huseyin Leblebici. 1977. Information Technology and Organizational Structure. Pacific Sociological Review, Vol. 20, 2 (April 1977), 241 -- 261.
[57]
Bogdana Rakova, Jingying Yang, Henriette Cramer, and Rumman Chowdhury. 2021. Where Responsible AI meets Reality: Practitioner Perspectives on Enablers for Shifting Organizational Practices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449081
[58]
Charvi Rastogi, Yunfeng Zhang, Dennis Wei, Kush R. Varshney, Amit Dhurandhar, and Richard Tomsett. 2022. Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CSCW1 (March 2022), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512930
[59]
Daniela Retelny, Sébastien Robaszkiewicz, Alexandra To, Walter S. Lasecki, Jay Patel, Negar Rahmati, Tulsee Doshi, Melissa Valentine, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2014. Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, Honolulu Hawaii USA, 75--85. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647409
[60]
Samantha Robertson, Tonya Nguyen, and Niloufar Salehi. 2021. Modeling Assumptions Clash with the Real World: Transparency, Equity, and Community Challenges for Student Assignment Algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445748
[61]
Devansh Saxena, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Pamela J. Wisniewski, and Shion Guha. 2021. A Framework of High-Stakes Algorithmic Decision-Making for the Public Sector Developed through a Case Study of Child-Welfare. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 1--41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476089
[62]
Beau G. Schelble, Christopher Flathmann, Nathan J. McNeese, Guo Freeman, and Rohit Mallick. 2022. Let's Think Together! Assessing Shared Mental Models, Performance, and Trust in Human-Agent Teams. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, GROUP (Jan. 2022), 1--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492832
[63]
Beau G. Schelble, Christopher Flathmann, Geoff Musick, Nathan J. McNeese, and Guo Freeman. 2022. I See You: Examining the Role of Spatial Information in Human-Agent Teams. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1--27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555099
[64]
Kjeld Schmidt and Liam Bannon. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 1, 1--2 (March 1992), 7--40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752449
[65]
Herbert A. Simon. 1957. Models of man, social and rational. Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. J. Wiley & Sons.
[66]
Herbert A. Simon. 1991. Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning. Organization Science, Vol. 2, 1 (1991), 125--134. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2634943
[67]
Herbert A. Simon. 1997. Administrative Behavior fourth ed.). Free Press, New York, NY. Originally published in 1945.
[68]
Herbert A. Simon. 2019. The Sciences of the Artificial reissue of the third edition with a new introduction ed.). The MIT Press. https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4551/The-Sciences-of-the-Artificial Originally published in 1968.
[69]
Harini Suresh and John Guttag. 2021. A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cycle. In Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization. ACM, -- NY USA, 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3465416.3483305
[70]
James D. Thompson. 2003. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Originally published in 1967.
[71]
Melissa A. Valentine and Rebecca Hinds. 2022. How Algorithms Change Occupational Expertise by Prompting Explicit Articulation and Testing of Experts? Theories. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4246167
[72]
Melissa A. Valentine, Daniela Retelny, Alexandra To, Negar Rahmati, Tulsee Doshi, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2017. Flash Organizations: Crowdsourcing Complex Work by Structuring Crowds As Organizations. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Denver Colorado USA, 3523--3537. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025811
[73]
Steven Peter Vallas. 1990. The Concept of Skill: A Critical Review. Work and Occupations, Vol. 17, 4 (Nov. 1990), 379--398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888490017004001
[74]
Elmira Van Den Broek, Anastasia Sergeeva, and Marleen Huysman Vrije. 2021. When the Machine Meets the Expert: An Ethnography of Developing AI for Hiring. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 45, 3 (Sept. 2021), 1557--1580. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16559
[75]
Helena Vasconcelos, Matthew Jörke, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Tobias Gerstenberg, Michael S. Bernstein, and Ranjay Krishna. 2023. Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, CSCW1 (April 2023), 1--38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579605
[76]
Georg Von Krogh. 2018. Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: New Opportunities for Phenomenon-Based Theorizing. Academy of Management Discoveries, Vol. 4, 4 (Dec. 2018), 404--409. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0084
[77]
Lauren Waardenburg, Marleen Huysman, and Anastasia V. Sergeeva. 2022. In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man Is King: Knowledge Brokerage in the Age of Learning Algorithms. Organization Science, Vol. 33, 1 (Jan. 2022), 59--82. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1544
[78]
Lauren Waardenburg, Anastasia Sergeeva, and Marleen Huysman. 2022. Juggling Street Work and Data Work: An Ethnography of Policing and Reporting Practices. Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2022, 1 (Aug. 2022), 16697. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.215
[79]
Oliver E. Williamson. 1970. Corporate Control and Business Behavior: An inquiry into the effects of organizational form on enterprise behavior. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
[80]
Christine Wolf and Jeanette Blomberg. 2019. Evaluating the Promise of Human-Algorithm Collaborations in Everyday Work Practices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359245
[81]
JoAnne Yates. 1993. Control through communication: the rise of system in American management johns hopkins paperbacks ed.). Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Md. Originally published in 1989.
Index Terms
- The Algorithm and the Org Chart: How Algorithms Can Conflict with Organizational Structures
Recommendations
The Organizational Design of High-Tech Entrepreneurial Ventures
The majority of the theoretical and empirical work in the field of organizational design has focused on large established companies, disregarding entrepreneurial ventures, although the organization of these firms is of paramount importance to their ...
Theoretical Analysis on Relation between Innovation and Organizational Structure
ICEE '12: Proceedings of the 2012 3rd International Conference on E-Business and E-Government - Volume 05Organizational structure is an important factor affecting innovation. Current studies on relation between innovation and organizational structure can been summarized as two kinds of theories: the theory on organization mode of innovation that focuses on ...
Organizational Structure and Firm Innovation in a Retail Chain
Two organizational structures for a retail chain are examined for their effect on the rate of firm innovation. A centralized organization is defined as one in which store practices are mandated from corporate headquarters (HQ) and this results in HQ being ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2024
5177 pages
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 08 November 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW2
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 97Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)97
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)97
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in