Unpacking Task Management Tools, Values, and Worker Dynamics
Article No.: 13, Pages 1 - 16
Abstract
As the complexity of daily tasks grows, knowledge workers experience challenges in managing tasks and risk skipping over some. Fortunately, various task management tools have become available, ranging from traditional tools, such as sticky notes, to complex project management software. In this exploratory study, we aim to understand the landscape of task management tools that knowledge workers use and identify the value they seek from such tools. In addition, we investigate how such value relates to workers’ personality traits and job characteristics. For this purpose, we conducted a series of formative studies and an online survey (N = 248) to evaluate the perceived importance of various attributes of task-management tools, followed by an exploratory factor analysis to identify the latent structure within that. This process revealed six underlying dimensions for task management tools: communicability, structure, portability, adaptability, physicality, and visualizability. Applying regression analysis, we found connections between latent dimensions and both personality traits and job characteristics. Our findings inform the design of future task management tools with guidance on choosing features and functionality that will meet the needs of their target populations.
References
[1]
Richelle Adams and Erik Blair. 2019. Impact of Time Management Behaviors on Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Performance. SAGE Open 9 (01 2019), 215824401882450. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018824506
[2]
Yoana Ahmetoglu, Duncan P. Brumby, and Anna L. Cox. 2021. To Plan or Not to Plan? A Mixed-Methods Diary Study Examining When, How and Why Knowledge Work Planning is Inaccurate. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW3, Article 222 (jan 2021), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432921
[3]
Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2 (1991), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Theories of Cognitive Self-Regulation.
[4]
David Allen. 2003. Getting Things Done. The Art of Stress-Free Productivity. Penguin. http://www.davidco.com/ ISBN-10: 0142000280 ISBN-13: 978-0142000281.
[5]
M. S. BARTLETT. 1951. The effect of standardization on a χ 2 approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika 38, 3-4 (12 1951), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.337
[6]
Nuran Bayram and Mine Aydemir. 2017. Decision-making styles and personality traits. International Journal of Recent Advances in Organizational Behaviour and Decision Sciences 3, 1 (2017), 905–915.
[7]
David Beard, Murugappan Palaniappan, Alan Humm, David Banks, Anil Nair, and Yen-Ping Shan. 1990. A Visual Calendar for Scheduling Group Meetings.279–290. https://doi.org/10.1145/99332.99361
[8]
Victoria Bellotti, Brinda Dalal, Nathaniel Good, Peter Flynn, Daniel Bobrow, and Nicolas Ducheneaut. 2004. What a to-do: studies of task management towards the design of a personal task list manager. Proceedings of CHI, Vienna, Austria 24–29, 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985785
[9]
Victoria Bellotti, Brinda Dalal, Nathaniel Good, Peter Flynn, Daniel Bobrow, and Nicolas Ducheneaut. 2004. What a to-do: studies of task management towards the design of a personal task list manager. Proceedings of CHI, Vienna, Austria 24–29, 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985785
[10]
Victoria Bellotti, Nicolas Ducheneaut, Mark Howard, and Ian Smith. 2003. Taking Email to Task: The Design and Evaluation of a Task Management Centered Email Tool. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642672
[11]
Frank Bentley, Konrad Tollmar, Peter Stephenson, Laura Levy, Brian Jones, Scott Robertson, Ed Price, Richard Catrambone, and Jeff Wilson. 2013. Health Mashups: Presenting Statistical Patterns between Wellbeing Data and Context in Natural Language to Promote Behavior Change. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20 (11 2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2503823
[12]
Ann Blandford and Thomas Green. 2001. Group and Individual Time Management Tools: What You Get is Not What You Need. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5 (12 2001), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000020
[13]
Godfred Boateng, Torsten Neilands, Edward Frongillo, Hugo Melgar-Quiñonez, and Sera Young. 2018. Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in Public Health 6 (06 2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
[14]
Bruce Britton and Abraham Tesser. 1991. Effects of Time-Management Practices on College Grades. Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (09 1991), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.405
[15]
Ryder Carroll. 2018. The bullet journal method: Track the past, order the present, design the future. Penguin.
[16]
Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie Kientz. 2014. Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (04 2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557372
[17]
Brigitte Claessens, Wendelien Eerde, Christel Rutte, and Robert Roe. 2010. Things to Do Today...: A Daily Diary Study on Task Completion at Work. Applied Psychology 59 (04 2010), 273 – 295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00390.x
[18]
Kenneth Conley and James Carpenter. 2007. Towel: Towards an Intelligent To-Do List. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Interaction Challenges for Intelligent Assistants. 26–32.
[19]
Paul T. Costa and Robert R. McCrae. 1992. Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences 13, 6 (1992), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
[20]
AB Costello and JW Osborne. 2005. Best pr Best practices in explor actices in exploratory factor analysis: Four or analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval 10 (2005), 1–10.
[21]
Mary Czerwinski, Eric Horvitz, and Susan Wilhite. 2004. A Diary Study of Task Switching and Interruptions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna, Austria) (CHI ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985715
[22]
Thomas H Davenport. 2005. Thinking for a living: how to get better performances and results from knowledge workers. Harvard Business Press.
[23]
Boele De Raad. 2000. The big five personality factors: the psycholexical approach to personality.Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
[24]
Colin DeYoung. 2015. Openness/intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration.369–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/14343-017
[25]
Ed Diener, Ed Sandvik, William Pavot, and Frank Fujita. 1992. Extraversion and subjective well-being in a U.S. National probability sample. Journal of Research in Personality 26 (09 1992), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(92)90039-7
[26]
Christine DiStefano, Min Zhu, and Diana Mindrila. 2009. Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation 14, 1 (2009), 20.
[27]
Anton N. Dragunov, Thomas G. Dietterich, Kevin Johnsrude, Matthew McLaughlin, Lida Li, and Jonathan L. Herlocker. 2005. TaskTracer: A Desktop Environment to Support Multi-Tasking Knowledge Workers. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (San Diego, California, USA) (IUI ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/1040830.1040855
[28]
Attar Fatima and Ouadi Khadija. 2023. Adaptation and Validation of the Big Five Inventory-2-Short Form in a Sample of Moroccan Young Adults. 3 (03 2023), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/V03I3Y2023-08
[29]
Eamonn Ferguson and Tom Cox. 1993. Exploratory factor analysis: A users’ guide. International journal of selection and assessment 1, 2 (1993), 84–94.
[30]
David Gallardo-Pujol, Victor Rouco, Anna Cortijos Bernabeu, Luis Oceja, Christopher Soto, and Oliver John. 2022. Factor Structure, Gender Invariance, Measurement Properties, and Short Forms of the Spanish Adaptation of the Big Five Inventory-2. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development 3 (07 2022). https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000020
[31]
Lewis R Goldberg. 1993. The structure of phenotypic personality traits.American psychologist 48, 1 (1993), 26.
[32]
Jonathan Grudin. 1994. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Commun. ACM 37, 1 (jan 1994), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1145/175222.175230
[33]
J. Hackman and Greg Oldham. 1975. Development of Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology 60, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546
[34]
J Richard Hackman and Greg R Oldham. 1974. The Job Diagnostic Survey: An instrument for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation of job redesign projects. (1974).
[35]
Mona Haraty and Joanna McGrenere. 2016. Designing for advanced personalization in personal task management. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901805
[36]
Mona Haraty, Joanna McGrenere, and Charlotte Tang. 2016. How personal task management differs across individuals. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 88 (2016), 13–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.11.006
[37]
Donna Harrington. 2009. Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford university press.
[38]
Sandra Hart and L. Stavenland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol 52, 139–. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
[39]
Sandra G Hart. 2006. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 50. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 904–908.
[40]
Robin Henson. 2001. Understanding Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: A Conceptual Primer on Coefficient Alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 34 (10 2001), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069034
[41]
Briana Horwitz, Gloria Luong, and Susan Charles. 2008. Neuroticism and Extraversion Share Genetic and Environmental Effects with Negative and Positive Mood Spillover in a Nationally Representative Sample. Personality and individual differences 45 (12 2008), 636–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.003
[42]
Donghan Hu and Sang Won Lee. 2020. ScreenTrack: Using a Visual History of a Computer Screen to Retrieve Documents and Web Pages. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376753
[43]
Donghan Hu and Sang Won Lee. 2022. Scrapbook: Screenshot-Based Bookmarks for Effective Digital Resource Curation across Applications. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526113.3545678
[44]
Ann Huang, Pascal Knierim, Francesco Chiossi, Lewis L Chuang, and Robin Welsch. 2022. Proxemics for Human-Agent Interaction in Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA,USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 421, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517593
[45]
Shamsi T. Iqbal and Eric Horvitz. 2007. Disruption and Recovery of Computing Tasks: Field Study, Analysis, and Directions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240730
[46]
Joshua Jackson, Tim Bogg, Kate Walton, Peter Harms, and Brent Roberts. 2010. What Do Conscientious People Do? Development and Validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness (BIC). Journal of research in personality 44 (08 2010), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.06.005
[47]
Lauri Jensen-Campbell and William Graziano. 2001. Agreeableness as a Moderator of Interpersonal Conflict. Journal of personality 69 (05 2001), 323–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00148
[48]
Oliver P John. 1991. The big five inventory—versions 4a and 54. (No Title) (1991).
[49]
Oliver P John, Laura P Naumann, and Christopher J Soto. 2008. Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. (2008).
[50]
Oliver P John, Sanjay Srivastava, 1999. The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. (1999).
[51]
Megan K Johnson, Wade C Rowatt, and Leo Petrini. 2011. A new trait on the market: Honesty–Humility as a unique predictor of job performance ratings. Personality and Individual differences 50, 6 (2011), 857–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.011
[52]
E Ásgeir Juliusson, Niklas Karlsson, and Tommy Gärling. 2005. Weighing the past and the future in decision making. European journal of cognitive psychology 17, 4 (2005), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440440000159
[53]
Amirrudin Kamsin, Ann Blandford, and Anna L Cox. 2012. Personal task management: my tools fall apart when I’m very busy! In CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1369–1374. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212457
[54]
Matthew Kay, Eun Kyoung Choe, Jesse Shepherd, Benjamin Greenstein, Nathaniel Watson, Sunny Consolvo, and Julie A Kientz. 2012. Lullaby: a capture & access system for understanding the sleep environment. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on ubiquitous computing. 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370253
[55]
Hugh Kearns and Maria Gardiner. 2007. Is it time well spent? The relationship between time management behaviours, perceived effectiveness and work-related morale and distress in a university context. High Education Research & Development 26, 2 (2007), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701310839
[56]
Bastian Kordyaka, Samuli Laato, Katharina Jahn, Juho Hamari, and Bjoern Niehaves. 2023. The Cycle of Toxicity: Exploring Relationships between Personality and Player Roles in Toxic Behavior in Multiplayer Online Battle Arena Games. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, CHI PLAY, Article 397 (oct 2023), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3611043
[57]
Jon A Krosnick, Allyson L Holbrook, Matthew K Berent, Richard T Carson, W Michael Hanemann, Raymond J Kopp, Robert Cameron Mitchell, Stanley Presser, Paul A Ruud, V Kerry Smith, 2002. The impact of" no opinion" response options on data quality: non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice?Public Opinion Quarterly 66, 3 (2002), 371–403.
[58]
Heejin Lee. 2003. Your time and my time: a temporal approach to groupware calendar systems. Information & Management 40, 3 (2003), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00140-9
[59]
Youngduk Lee, Christopher M Berry, and Erik Gonzalez-Mulé. 2019. The importance of being humble: A meta-analysis and incremental validity analysis of the relationship between honesty-humility and job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology 104, 12 (2019), 1535. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000421
[60]
James J Lin, Lena Mamykina, Silvia Lindtner, Gregory Delajoux, and Henry B Strub. 2006. Fish’n’Steps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In International conference on ubiquitous computing. Springer, 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/11853565_16
[61]
John R Lund and Jason Wiese. 2021. Less is more: exploring support for time management planning. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462133
[62]
Lena Mamykina, Elizabeth Mynatt, Patricia Davidson, and Daniel Greenblatt. 2008. MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357131
[63]
Gloria Mark, Mary Czerwinski, and Shamsi T Iqbal. 2018. Effects of individual differences in blocking workplace distractions. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173666
[64]
Gloria Mark, Shamsi T Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, Paul Johns, and Akane Sano. 2016. Neurotics can’t focus: An in situ study of online multitasking in the workplace. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1739–1744. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858202
[65]
Robert R McCrae. 2009. The five-factor model of personality traits: Consensus and controversy. The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (2009), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596544.012
[66]
Robert R McCrae and Paul T Costa Jr. 2008. The five-factor theory of personality. (2008).
[67]
J Murray McNiel and William Fleeson. 2006. The causal effects of extraversion on positive affect and neuroticism on negative affect: Manipulating state extraversion and state neuroticism in an experimental approach. Journal of Research in Personality 40, 5 (2006), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.05.003
[68]
Chris Parnin and Spencer Rugaber. 2011. Resumption strategies for interrupted programming tasks. Software Quality Journal 19 (2011), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2009.5090030
[69]
Stephen J Payne. 1993. Understanding calendar use. Human-Computer Interaction 8, 2 (1993), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0802_1
[70]
Robert A Power and Michael Pluess. 2015. Heritability estimates of the Big Five personality traits based on common genetic variants. Translational psychiatry 5, 7 (2015), e604–e604. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.96
[71]
Beatrice Rammstedt, Clemens M Lechner, and Daniel Danner. 2020. Short forms do not fall short. European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2020).
[72]
Darrell Rigby. 2001. Management Tools and Techniques: A Survey. California Management Review 43 (12 2001), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166079
[73]
Peter Samuels. 2017. Advice on exploratory factor analysis. (2017).
[74]
Richard P Schuler, Sukeshini A Grandhi, Julia M Mayer, Stephen T Ricken, and Quentin Jones. 2014. The doing of doing stuff: understanding the coordination of social group-activities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557388
[75]
Gavin R Slemp and Dianne A Vella-Brodrick. 2013. The Job Crafting Questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting.International Journal of wellbeing 3, 2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v3i2.1
[76]
Mark Snyder and William Ickes. 1985. Personality and social behavior. Handbook of social psychology 2, 3 (1985), 883–947.
[77]
Christopher J Soto and Oliver P John. 2017. The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.Journal of personality and social psychology 113, 1 (2017), 117. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
[78]
Christopher J Soto and Oliver P John. 2017. Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality 68 (2017), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004
[79]
Keith S Taber. 2018. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education 48 (2018), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
[80]
Gabriela N Tonietto, Selin A Malkoc, and Stephen M Nowlis. 2019. When an hour feels shorter: Future boundary tasks alter consumption by contracting time. Journal of Consumer Research 45, 5 (2019), 1085–1102. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy043
[81]
Joe Tullio, Jeremy Goecks, Elizabeth Mynatt, and David Nguyen. 2002. Augmenting shared personal calendars. 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/571985.571988
[82]
Sarah Theres Völkel, Ramona Schoedel, Lale Kaya, and Sven Mayer. 2022. User Perceptions of Extraversion in Chatbots after Repeated Use. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA,USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 253, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502058
[83]
Sarah Völkel, Daniel Buschek, Jelena Pranjic, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2019. Understanding Emoji Interpretation through User Personality and Message Context. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338286.3340114
[84]
Marley Watkins. 2018. Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology 44 (04 2018), 009579841877180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807
[85]
Steve Whittaker, Victoria Bellotti, and Jacek Gwizdka. 2006. Email in Personal Information Management. Commun. ACM 49 (01 2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1107458.1107494
[86]
Jason Wiese, John R. Lund, and Kazi Sinthia Kabir. 2023. Adding Domain-Specific Features to a Text-Editor to Support Diverse, Real-World Approaches to Time Management Planning. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 856, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581536
[87]
Alex C. Williams, Shamsi Iqbal, Julia Kiseleva, and Ryen W. White. 2023. Managing Tasks across the Work–Life Boundary: Opportunities, Challenges, and Directions. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 30, 3, Article 48 (jun 2023), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582429
Index Terms
- Unpacking Task Management Tools, Values, and Worker Dynamics
Recommendations
Work Fragmentation, Task Management Practices and Productivity in Individual Knowledge Work
Engineering Psychology and Cognitive ErgonomicsAbstractThe study examined the nature of task management practices, their prevalence and relations to experiences of work fragmentation and productivity among Finnish state governmental organization employees, all of them knowledge workers. In the ...
Understanding Personal Productivity: How Knowledge Workers Define, Evaluate, and Reflect on Their Productivity
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsProductivity tracking tools often determine productivity based on the time interacting with work-related applications. To deconstruct productivity's diverse and nebulous nature, we investigate how knowledge workers conceptualize personal productivity ...
Relational roots of IT worker organizational commitment
SIGMIS CPR '09: Proceedings of the special interest group on management information system's 47th annual conference on Computer personnel researchThis paper builds a model showing how people relationships affect job satisfaction and organizational commitment in IT workers. The relationship predictors are trust in management and perceived harmonious teamwork. The effects of these predictors are ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2024
297 pages
ISBN:9798400710179
DOI:10.1145/3663384
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 25 June 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CHIWORK 2024
CHIWORK 2024: Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work
June 25 - 27, 2024
Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 539Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)539
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)263
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatGet Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in