Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3490149.3501310acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Glaze Epochs: Understanding Lifelong Material Relationships within Ceramics Studios

Published: 13 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The “material turn” in HCI has placed a renewed focus on informing design from the relationships found in material-based interactions. While several ethnographic works provide insight into how practitioners converse with materials, it is less understood how these conversations transform into a skilled practitioner’s relationship with a material. We examine the material practice of glazing that gives ceramics its decorative and functional characteristics and involves fusing mixtures of silica, alumina, and flux onto a clay body through kiln firing. This practice evolves over decades developing from multiple trajectories including theoretical foundations, systematic experimentation, and happy accidents. This work describes virtual site visits with six expert ceramicists and documents how material knowledge is externalized in practice, teaching, and the studio environment. We synthesize our findings into a framework to inform the design of material interactions that moves beyond discrete and momentary material encounters towards lifelong material epochs.

References

[1]
Derek Au. 2020. glazy.org. https://glazy.org/
[2]
Bahareh Barati, Elisa Giaccardi, and Elvin Karana. 2018. The making of performativity in designing [with] smart material composites. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.
[3]
Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt. 1999. Contextual design. Interactions 6, 1 (Jan. 1999), 32–42.
[4]
Amy Cheatle and Steven J Jackson. 2015. Digital entanglements: craft, computation and collaboration in fine art furniture production. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 958–968.
[5]
Ricky Chen, Mychajlo Demko, Daragh Byrne, and Marti Louw. 2021. Probing Documentation Practices: Reflecting on Students’ Conceptions, Values, and Experiences with Documentation in Creative Inquiry. In Creativity and Cognition(C&C ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3465391
[6]
Victoria Clarke and Virginia Braun. 2014. Thematic analysis. In Encyclopedia of critical psychology. Springer, 1947–1952.
[7]
Laura Devendorf, Abigail De Kosnik, Kate Mattingly, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2016. Probing the potential of post-anthropocentric 3D printing. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on designing interactive systems. 170–181.
[8]
Kristin N. Dew and Daniela K. Rosner. 2018. Lessons from the Woodshop: Cultivating Design with Living Materials. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174159
[9]
Nir Dick, Naama Glauber, Adi Yehezkeli, Moran Mizrahi, Shani Reches, Maiayn Ben-Yona, Anna Carmi, and Amit Zoran. 2018. Design with Minimal Intervention: Drawing with Light and Cracks. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1107–1120. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196814
[10]
Shreyosi Endow and Cesar Torres. 2021. “I’m Better Off on My Own”: Understanding How a Tutorial’s Medium Affects Physical Skill Development. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021(Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1313–1323. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462066
[11]
Gerhard Fischer, Elisa Giaccardi, Hal Eden, Masanori Sugimoto, and Yunwen Ye. 2005. Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International journal of human-computer studies 63, 4-5 (2005), 482–512.
[12]
William W Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 233–240.
[13]
Geoffrey Gowlland. 2015. Unpacking craft skills: What can images reveal about the embodied experience of craft?Visual Anthropology 28, 4 (2015), 286–297.
[14]
Camilla Groth, Maarit Mäkelä, and Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen. 2015. Tactile augmentation: A multimethod for capturing experiential knowledge. Craft Research 6, 1 (2015), 57–81.
[15]
Tom Gunning. 2004. PLENARY SESSION II. Digital Aestethics. What’s the Point of an Index? or, Faking Photographs. Nordicom Review 25, 1-2 (2004), 39–49.
[16]
Linda Hirsch, Beat Rossmy, and Andreas Butz. 2021. Shaping Concrete for Interaction. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 1–11.
[17]
Tim Ingold. 2013. Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge.
[18]
James C Kaufman and Ronald A Beghetto. 2009. Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of general psychology 13, 1 (2009), 1–12.
[19]
Irni Eliana Khairuddin, Corina Sas, and Chris Speed. 2019. BlocKit: A Physical Kit for Materializing and Designing for Blockchain Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1449–1462.
[20]
Stacey Kuznetsov and Eric Paulos. 2010. Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: extending boundaries. 295–304.
[21]
Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 1999. Legitimate peripheral participation. Learners, learning and assessment, London: The Open University (1999), 83–89.
[22]
Jessica Lingel. 2016. The Poetics of Socio-Technical Space: Evaluating the Internet of Things Through Craft. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 815–826.
[23]
Yilin Elaine Liu, Michael Nitsche, and Benjamin N. Sugar. 2019. Reflection on Tacit Knowledge - Effect of Providing EMG Visualization on Reflections on Throwing Clay. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition(C&C ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3326576
[24]
Nolwenn Maudet, Ghita Jalal, Philip Tchernavskij, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, and Wendy E Mackay. 2017. Beyond Grids: Interactive Graphical Substrates to Structure Digital Layout. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5053–5064.
[25]
David R Millen. 2000. Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. 280–286.
[26]
Martin Murer. 2018. Making Things Apart: Gaining Material Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 497–509.
[27]
Michael Nitsche and Anna Weisling. 2019. When is it not Craft? Materiality and Mediation when Craft and Computing Meet. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Tempe, Arizona, USA) (TEI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 683–689.
[28]
Minna Pakanen, Kasper Heiselberg, Troy Robert Nachtigall, Marie Broe, and Peter Gall Krogh. 2021. Crafting a Leather Self-tracking Device for Pollen Allergies. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 1–15.
[29]
Andrew Quitmeyer and Hannah Perner-Wilson. 2015. Wearable studio practice: design considerations for digital crafting in harsh environments. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers(UbiComp/ISWC’15 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2807926
[30]
TM Race and S Makri. 2016. Introducing Serendipity. In Accidental Information Discovery. Elsevier, 1–13.
[31]
Erica Robles and Mikael Wiberg. 2010. Texturing the ”Material Turn” in Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) (TEI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709911
[32]
Daniela K. Rosner. 2012. The material practices of collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145375
[33]
Daniela K Rosner, Miwa Ikemiya, and Tim Regan. 2015. Resisting Alignment: Code and Clay. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stanford, California, USA) (TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 181–188.
[34]
Hidekazu Saegusa, Thomas Tran, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2016. Mimetic Machines: Collaborative Interventions in Digital Fabrication with Arc. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6008–6013. http://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858475
[35]
Kim Salazar. [n.d.]. Contextual Inquiry: Inspire Design by Observing and Interviewing Users in Their Context. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/contextual-inquiry/
[36]
Richard Sennett. 2008. The craftsman. Yale University Press.
[37]
Toyohiko Sugiyama. 2014. Construction of a glaze database. Key Eng. Mater. 608 (April 2014), 37–40.
[38]
Cesar Torres and Eric Paulos. 2015. MetaMorphe: Designing expressive 3D models for digital fabrication. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 73–82.
[39]
Cesar Torres, Sarah Sterman, Molly Nicholas, Richard Lin, Eric Pai, and Eric Paulos. 2018. Guardians of Practice: A Contextual Inquiry of Failure-Mitigation Strategies within Creative Practices. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1259–1267.
[40]
Cesar Armando Torres. 2019. Hybrid Aesthetics: Bridging Material Practices and Digital Fabrication through Computational Crafting Proxies. Ph.D. Dissertation. UC Berkeley.
[41]
Cristen Torrey, David W. McDonald, Bill N. Schilit, and Sara Bly. 2007. How-To pages: Informal systems of expertise sharing. In ECSCW 2007, Liam J. Bannon, Ina Wagner, Carl Gutwin, Richard H. R. Harper, and Kjeld Schmidt (Eds.). Springer, London, 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-031-5_21
[42]
Vasiliki Tsaknaki. 2017. Making Preciousness: Interaction Design through Studio Crafts. Ph.D. Dissertation. KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
[43]
Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Ylva Fernaeus, and Mischa Schaub. 2014. Leather as a material for crafting interactive and physical artifacts. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. 5–14.
[44]
Anna Vallgårda and Ylva Fernaeus. 2015. Interaction design as a bricolage practice. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. 173–180.
[45]
Anna Vallgårda and Johan Redström. 2007. Computational composites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 513–522.
[46]
Mikael Wiberg, Hiroshi Ishii, Paul Dourish, Anna Vallgårda, Tobie Kerridge, Petra Sundström, Daniela Rosner, and Mark Rolston. 2013. Materiality matters—experience materials. Interactions 20, 2 (March 2013), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/2427076.2427087
[47]
Nicola Wood. 2008. The new journeyman: The role of an expert learner in eliciting and transmitting skilled knowledge. (2008).
[48]
Nicola Wood, Chris Rust, and Grace Horne. 2009. A tacit understanding: The designer’s role in capturing and passing on the skilled knowledge of master craftsmen. International Journal of Design 3, 3 (2009).
[49]
Clement Zheng and Michael Nitsche. 2017. Combining Practices in Craft and Design. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3024973
[50]
Amit Zoran and Leah Buechley. 2012. Hybrid Reassemblage: An Exploration of Craft, Digital Fabrication and Artifact Uniqueness. Leonardo 46, 1 (Oct. 2012), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00477 Publisher: MIT Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Makers, Crafters, Tinkerers: How Identities and Biographies Come into BeingAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685455(1-3)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Shared, Shaped, and Stolen: Tracing Sites of Knowledge Transfer across Creative Communities of PracticeProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656199(638-650)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Shape Cast: Automating 3D Design for Plaster Molds in Ceramic Slip CastingExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651020(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Glaze Epochs: Understanding Lifelong Material Relationships within Ceramics Studios
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    TEI '22: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
    February 2022
    758 pages
    ISBN:9781450391474
    DOI:10.1145/3490149
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 13 February 2022

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Creativity Support Tools
    2. Design
    3. Materiality

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    TEI '22
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

    Upcoming Conference

    TEI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)447
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)116
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Makers, Crafters, Tinkerers: How Identities and Biographies Come into BeingAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685455(1-3)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Shared, Shaped, and Stolen: Tracing Sites of Knowledge Transfer across Creative Communities of PracticeProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656199(638-650)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Shape Cast: Automating 3D Design for Plaster Molds in Ceramic Slip CastingExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651020(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)WeaveSlicer: Expanding the Range of Printable Geometries in ClayProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642622(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Shape-Changing Clay-Dough: Taking a Material-Oriented Approach to 3D Printing Ceramic FormsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642246(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Learning from Hybrid Craft: Investigating and Reflecting on Innovating and Enlivening Traditional Craft through Literature ReviewProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642205(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Clothing suggestions based on comfort extracted from physiological and emotional parametersInternational Journal of Clothing Science and Technology10.1108/IJCST-10-2022-0141Online publication date: 4-Jul-2024
    • (2023)Beyond the Artifact: Power as a Lens for Creativity Support ToolsProceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3586183.3606831(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Understanding Version Control as Material Interaction with QuickposeProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581394(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Playing with DIRT: Building the Framework for a Comprehensive Materials DatabaseEarth and Space 202210.1061/9780784484470.077(920-934)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media