article

A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model

Authors:

William R. King,

Jun HeAuthors Info & Claims

Information and Management, Volume 43, Issue 6

Pages 740 - 755

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003

Published: 01 September 2006 Publication History

Abstract

A statistical meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model (TAM) as applied in various fields was conducted using 88 published studies that provided sufficient data to be credible. The results show TAM to be a valid and robust model that has been widely used, but which potentially has wider applicability. A moderator analysis involving user types and usage types was performed to investigate conditions under which TAM may have different effects. The study confirmed the value of using students as surrogates for professionals in some TAM studies, and perhaps more generally. It also revealed the power of meta-analysis as a rigorous alternative to qualitative and narrative literature review methods.

References

[1]

{1} I. Adamson, I. Shine, Extending the new technology acceptance model to measure the end user information systems satisfaction in a mandatory environment: a bank's treasure, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15(4), 2003, pp. 441-455.

[2]

{2} R. Agarwal, J. Prasad, Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences 30(2), 1999, pp. 361-391.

[3]

{3} K. Amoako-Gyampah, A.F. Salam, An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment, Information & Management 41(6), 2004, pp. 731-745.

Digital Library

[4]

{4} D.J. Barker, P. Van Schaik, D.S. Simpson, W.A. Corbett, Evaluating a spoken dialogue system for recording clinical observations during an endoscopic examination, Medical Informatics and The Internet in Medicine 28(2), 2003, pp. 85-97.

[5]

{5} S.C. Chan, M.T. Lu, Understanding internet banking adoption and use behavior: a Hong Kong perspective, Journal of Global Information Management 12(3), 2003, pp. 21-43.

[6]

{6} P.Y.K. Chau, An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model, Journal of Management Information Systems 13(2), 1996, pp. 185-204.

Digital Library

[7]

{7} P.Y.K. Chau, P.J.H. Hu, Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories, Information & Management 39(4), 2002, pp. 297-311.

Digital Library

[8]

{8} P.Y.K. Chau, V.S.K. Lai, An empirical investigation of the determinants of user acceptance of internet banking, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 13(2), 2003, pp. 123-145.

[9]

{9} L.D. Chen, M.L. Gillenson, D.L. Sherrell, Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective, Information & Management 39(8), 2002, pp. 705-719.

Digital Library

[10]

{10} J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, second ed., Academic, New York, 1988.

[11]

{11} J. Cohen, A power primer, Psychological Bulletin 112(1), 1992, pp. 155-159.

[12]

{12} S. Dasgupta, M. Granger, N. McGarry, User acceptance of E-collaboration technology: an extension of the technology acceptance model, Group Decision and Negotiation 11 (2), 2002, pp. 87-100.

[13]

{13} F.D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly 13(3), 1989, pp. 318-340.

Digital Library

[14]

{14} F.D. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi, P.R. Warshwa, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science 35(8), 1989, pp. 982-1003.

Digital Library

[15]

{15} F.D. Davis, V. Venkatesh, A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45(1), 1996, pp. 19-45.

Digital Library

[16]

{16} F.D. Davis, V. Venkatesh, Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51(1), 2004, pp. 31-46.

[17]

{17} X. Deng, W.J. Doll, A.R. Hendrickson, J.A. Scazzero, A multigroup analysis of structural invariance: an illustration using the technology acceptance model, Information & Management 42(5), 2005, pp. 745-759.

Digital Library

[18]

{18} S. Devaraj, M. Fan, R. Kohli, Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: validating E-Commerce metrics, Information Systems Research 13(3), 2002, pp. 316-333.

Digital Library

[19]

{19} C.A. Di Benedetto, R.J. Calantone, C. Zhang, International technology transfer--model and exploratory study in the People's Republic of China, International Marketing Review 20(4), 2003, pp. 446-462.

[20]

{20} M.T. Dishaw, D.M. Strong, Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs, Information & Management 36(1), 1999, pp. 9-21.

[21]

{21} D. Eden, T. Aviv, From the editors: replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ's publication policy, Academy of Management Journal 45(5), 2002, pp. 841-846.

[22]

{22} M.S. Featherman, P.A. Pavlou, Predicting E-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(4), 2003, pp. 451-474.

Digital Library

[23]

{23} A.P. Field, Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods, Psychological Methods 6(2), 2001, pp. 161-180.

[24]

{24} A.P. Field, The problem in using fixed-effects models of meta-analysis on real-world data, Understanding Statistics 2(2), 2003, p. 105.

[25]

{25} M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, California, 1975.

[26]

{26} D. Gefen, What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness, Journal of Management Information Systems 21(1), 2004, pp. 263-288.

Digital Library

[27]

{27} D. Gefen, E. Karahanna, D.W. Straub, Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50(3), 2003, pp. 307-321.

[28]

{28} D. Gefen, M. Keil, The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: an extension of the technology acceptance model, Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 29(2), 1998, pp. 35-49.

Digital Library

[29]

{29} D. Gefen, D.W. Straub, Managing user trust in B2C E-services, E-Service Journal 22(3), 2003, pp. 7-24.

[30]

{30} L. Gentry, R. Calantone, A comparison of three models to explain Shop-Bot use on the web, Psychology & Marketing 19(11), 2002, pp. 945-956.

[31]

{31} G.V. Glass, Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research, Educational Researcher 5, 1976, pp. 3-8.

[32]

{32} E.E. Grandon, J.M. Pearson, Electronic commerce adoption: an empirical study of small and medium US businesses, Information & Management 42(1), 2004, pp. 197-216.

Digital Library

[33]

{33} B.C. Hardgrave, F.D. Davis, C.K. Riemenschneider, Investigating determinants of software developers' intentions to follow methodologies, Journal of Management Information Systems 20(1), 2003, pp. 123-151.

Digital Library

[34]

{34} L.V. Hedges, I. Olkin, Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis, Academic Press, 1985.

[35]

{35} R. Henderson, M.J. Divett, Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(3), 2003, pp. 383-395.

Digital Library

[36]

{36} R. Henderson, D. Rickwood, P. Roberts, The Beta test of an electronic supermarket, Interacting With Computers 10(4), 1998, pp. 385-399.

[37]

{37} W.Y. Hong, J.Y.L. Thong, W.M. Wong, K.Y. Tam, Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics, Journal of Management Information Systems 18(3), 2001, pp. 97-124.

Digital Library

[38]

{38} R.P. Horton, T. Buck, P.E. Waterson, C.W. Clegg, Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model, Journal of Information Technology 16(4), 2001, pp. 237-249.

[39]

{39} A. Howard, Rapid application development: rough and dirty or value-for-money engineering? Communications of the ACM 45(10), 2002, pp. 27-30.

Digital Library

[40]

{40} C.L. Hsu, H.P. Lu, Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience Information & Management 41(7), 2004, pp. 853-868.

[41]

{41} P.J. Hu, P.Y.K. Chau, O.R.L. Sheng, K.Y. Tam, Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology, Journal of Management Information Systems 16(2), 1999, pp. 91-112.

Digital Library

[42]

{42} L.J. Huang, M.T. Lu, B.K. Wong, The impact of power distance on Email acceptance: evidence from the PRC, Journal of Computer Information Systems 44(1), 2003, pp. 93-101.

[43]

{43} J.E. Hunter, F.L. Schmidt, Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.

[44]

{44} M. Igbaria, T. Guimaraes, G.B. Davis, Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model, Journal of Management Information Systems 11(4), 1995, pp. 87-114.

Digital Library

[45]

{45} M. Igbaria, N. Zinatelli, P. Cragg, A.L.M. Cavaye, Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model, MIS Quarterly 21(3), 1997, pp. 279-305.

Digital Library

[46]

{46} C.M. Jackson, S. Chow, R.A. Leitch, Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system, Decision Sciences 28(2), 1997, pp. 357-389.

[47]

{47} E. Karahanna, M. Limayem, E-mail and V-mail usage: generalizing across technologies, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 10(1), 2000, pp. 49-66.

[48]

{48} E. Karahanna, D.W. Straub, The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use, Information & Management 35(4), 1999, pp. 237-250.

Digital Library

[49]

{49} W.R. King, D.I. Cleland, Manager analyst teamwork in management information systems, Business Horizons 14(2), 1971, p. 59.

[50]

{50} W.R. King, J. He, Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research, Communications of the AIS 16, October 2005, pp. 665-686, Article 32.

[51]

{51} T. Klaus, T. Gyires, H.J. Wen, The use of web-based information systems for non-work activities: an empirical study, Human Systems Management 22(3), 2003, pp. 105-114.

[52]

{52} M. Kleijnen, M. Wetzels, K. De Ruyter, Consumer acceptance of wireless finance, Journal of Financial Services Marketing 8(3), 2004, pp. 206-217.

[53]

{53} M. Koufaris, Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior, Information Systems Research 13(2), 2002, pp. 205-223.

Digital Library

[54]

{54} A.L. Lederer, D.J. Maupin, M.P. Sena, Y.L. Zhuang, The technology acceptance model in the world wide web, Decision Support Systems 29(3), 2000, pp. 269-282.

Digital Library

[55]

{55} P. Legris, J. Ingham, P. Collerette, Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model Information & Management 40(3), 2003, pp. 191-204.

[56]

{56} D.H. Li, J. Day, H. Lou, G. Coombs, The effect of affiliation motivation on the intention to use groupware in an MBA program, Journal of Computer Information Systems 44(3), 2004, pp. 1-8.

[57]

{57} S.S. Liaw, Understanding user perceptions of world-wide web environments, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18(2), 2002, pp. 137-148.

[58]

{58} J. Lim, A conceptual framework on the adoption of negotiation support systems, Information and Software Technology 45(8), 2003, pp. 469-477.

[59]

{59} F.H. Lin, J.H. Wu, An empirical study of end-user computing acceptance factors in small and medium enterprises in Taiwan: analyzed by structural equation modeling, Journal of Computer Information Systems 44(4), 2004, pp. 98-108.

[60]

{60} J.C.C. Lin, H.P. Lu, Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a web site, International Journal of Information Management 20(3), 2000, pp. 197-208.

Digital Library

[61]

{61} H.P. Lu, H.J. Yu, S.S.K. Lu, The effects of cognitive style and model type on DSS acceptance: an empirical study, European Journal of Operational Research 131(3), 2001, pp. 649-663.

[62]

{62} H.C. Lucas, V. Spitler, Technology use and performance: a field study of broker workstations, Decision Sciences 30(2), 1999, pp. 291-311.

[63]

{63} H.C. Lucas, V. Spitler, Implementation in a World of workstations and networks, Information & Management 38(2), 2000, pp. 119-128.

Digital Library

[64]

{64} Q. Ma, L. Liu, The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 16(1), 2004, pp. 59-72.

[65]

{65} K. Mathieson, Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior, Information Systems Research 2(3), 1991, pp. 173-191.

Digital Library

[66]

{66} D. McCloskey, Evaluating electronic commerce acceptance with the technology acceptance model, Journal of Computer Information Systems 44(2), 2003, pp. 49-57.

[67]

{67} J.W. Moon, Y.G. Kim, Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context, Information & Management 38(4), 2001, pp. 217-230.

Digital Library

[68]

{68} M.G. Morris, A. Dillon, How user perceptions influence software use, IEEE Software 14(4), 1997, pp. 58-65.

Digital Library

[69]

{69} S. Oh, J. Ang, B. Kim, Adoption of broadband internet in Korea: the role of experience in building attitudes, Journal of Information Technology 18(4), 2003, pp. 267-280.

[70]

{70} C.S. Ong, J.Y. Lai, Y.S. Wang, Factors affecting Engineers' acceptance of asynchronous E-Learning systems in high-tech companies, Information & Management 41(6), 2004, pp. 795-804.

Digital Library

[71]

{71} H.G. Osburn, J. Callender, A note on the sampling variance of the mean uncorrected correlation in meta-analysis and validity generalization, Journal of Applied Psychology 77(2), 1992, pp. 115-122.

[72]

{72} P.A. Pavlou, Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7(3), 2003, pp. 101-134.

Digital Library

[73]

{73} L.A. Phillips, R. Calantone, International technology adoption: behavior structure, demand certainty and culture, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 9(2), 1994, pp. 16-28.

[74]

{74} C.R. Plouffe, J.S. Hulland, M. Vandenbosch, Research Report: richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions-understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system, Information Systems Research 12(2), 2001, pp. 208-222.

Digital Library

[75]

{75} A. Rai, S.S. Lang, R.B. Welker, Assessing the validity of Is success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis, Information Systems Research 13(1), 2002, pp. 50-69.

Digital Library

[76]

{76} C.K. Rimenschneider, B.C. Hardgrave, Explaining software development tool use with the technology acceptance model, Journal of Computer Information Systems 41(4), 2001, pp. 1-8.

[77]

{77} C.K. Riemenschneider, B.C. Hardgrave, F.D. Davis, Explaining software developer acceptance of methodologies: a comparison of five theoretical models, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(12), 2002, pp. 1135-1145.

Digital Library

[78]

{78} C.K. Riemenschneider, D.A. Harrison, P.P. Mykytyn, Understanding IT adoption decisions in small business: integrating current theories, Information & Management 40(4), 2003, pp. 269-285.

Digital Library

[79]

{79} R. Rosenthal, Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research, Rev. ed., Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1991.

[80]

{80} R. Rosenthal, M.R. DiMatteo, Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews, Annual Review of Psychology 52(1), 2001, pp. 59-82.

[81]

{81} F.L. Schmidt, J.E. Hunter, Comparison of three meta-analysis methods revisited: an analysis of Johnson, Mullen and Salas, Journal of Applied Psychology 84(1), 1999, pp. 144-148.

[82]

{82} R.L. Schnltz, D.P. Slevin, The implementation profile, Interfaces 13(1), 1983, pp. 87-92.

[83]

{83} H.M. Selim, An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites, Computers & Education 40(4), 2003, pp. 343-360.

Digital Library

[84]

{84} A.H. Seyal, G.G.M. Pijpers, Senior Government executives' use of the internet: a Bruneian scenario, Behavior & Information Technology 23(3), 2004, pp. 197-210.

[85]

{85} H.P. Shih, Extended technology acceptance model of internet utilization behavior, Information & Management 41(6), 2004, pp. 719-729.

Digital Library

[86]

{86} M.R. Stafford, B. Stern, Consumer bidding behavior on internet auction sites, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7(1), 2002, pp. 135-150.

Digital Library

[87]

{87} L. Stoel, K.H. Lee, Modeling the effect of experience on student acceptance of web-based courseware, Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 13(5), 2003, pp. 364-374.

[88]

{88} D. Straub, M. Keil, W. Brenner, Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study, Information & Management 33(1), 1997, pp. 1-11.

Digital Library

[89]

{89} D. Straub, M. Limayem, E. Karahannaevaristo, Measuring system usage--implications for IS theory testing, Management Science 41(8), 1995, pp. 1328-1342.

Digital Library

[90]

{90} B. Szajna, Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model, Management Science 42(1), 1996, pp. 85-92.

[91]

{91} S. Taylor, P. Todd, Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience, MIS Quarterly 19(4), 1995, pp. 561-570.

Digital Library

[92]

{92} S. Taylor, P. Todd, Understanding information technology usage--a test of competing models, Information Systems Research 6(2), 1995, pp. 144-176.

Digital Library

[93]

{93} H.H. Teo, H.C. Chan, K.K. Wei, Z.J. Zhang, Evaluating information accessibility and community adaptivity features for sustaining virtual learning communities, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(5), 2003, pp. 671-697.

Digital Library

[94]

{94} J.Y.L. Thong, W.Y. Hong, K.Y. Tam, Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57(3), 2002, pp. 215-242.

Digital Library

[95]

{95} A.M. Townsend, S.M. Demarie, A.R. Hendrickson, Desktop video conferencing in virtual workgroups: anticipation, system evaluation and performance, Information Systems Journal 11(3), 2001, pp. 213-227.

[96]

{96} D. Tudhope, P. Beynon-Davis, H. Mackay, Prototyping Praxis: constructing computer systems and building belief, Human-Computer Interaction 15(4), 2000, pp. 353-384.

Digital Library

[97]

{97} H. van der Heijden, Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic Portal in the Netherlands, Information & Management 40(6), 2003, pp. 541-549.

Digital Library

[98]

{98} P. Van Schaik, J.A. Bettany-Saltikov, J.G. Warren, Clinical acceptance of a low-cost portable system for postural assessment, Behaviour & Information Technology 21(1), 2002, pp. 47-57.

[99]

{99} V. Venkatesh, Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation, MIS Quarterly 23(2), 1999, pp. 239-260.

Digital Library

[100]

{100} V. Venkatesh, Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model, Information Systems Research 11(4), 2000, pp. 342-365.

Digital Library

[101]

{101} V. Venkatesh, F.D. Davis, A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test, Decision Sciences 27(3), 1996, pp. 451-481.

[102]

{102} V. Venkatesh, F.D. Davis, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Management Science 46(2), 2000, pp. 186-204.

Digital Library

[103]

{103} V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior MIS Quarterly 24(1), 2000, pp. 115-139.

[104]

{104} V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, F.D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly 27(3), 2003, pp. 425-478.

Digital Library

[105]

{105} L.R. Vijayasarathy, Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model, Information & Management 41(6), 2004, pp. 747-762.

Digital Library

[106]

{106} Y.S. Wang, The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: an empirical study, Government Information Quarterly 20(4), 2003, pp. 333-352.

[107]

{107} Y.S. Wang, Y.M. Wang, H.H. Lin, T.I. Tang, Determinants of user acceptance of internet banking: an empirical study, International Journal of Service Industry Management 14(5), 2003, pp. 501-519.

[108]

{108} F.M. Wolf, Meta-analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1986.

[109]

{109} H.D. Yang, Y. Yoo, It's All About Attitude: Revisiting the Technology Acceptance Model, Decision Support Systems 38(1), 2004, pp. 19-31.

Digital Library

[110]

{110} M.Y. Yi, Y.J. Hwang, Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(4), 2003, pp. 431-449.

Digital Library

Cited By

Lang FRiegel L(2025)Acceptance of online customer channels for damage claims in GermanyInformation Technology and Management10.1007/s10799-023-00404-z26:1(101-116)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10799-023-00404-z
Metzger ALaufer JFeit FPohl K(2024)A User Study on Explainable Online Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive SystemsACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems10.1145/366600519:3(1-44)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3666005
Auger CBoisvert AJobin KMichaud F(2024)Perception of the usefulness of socially assistive robots for adherence to home-based rehabilitation exercises for persons with chronic neurological conditionsProceedings of the 17th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3652037.3663930(515-522)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3652037.3663930
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model

Recommendations

A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects

We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of previous research on the technology acceptance model (TAM) in an attempt to make well-grounded statements on the role of subjective norm. Furthermore, we compared TAM results by taking into account moderating ...
A meta-analysis of the role of environmentbased voluntariness in information technology acceptance

The technology acceptance model (TAM) asserts that ease of use and usefulness are two primary determinants of behavioral intention and usage. A parallel research stream emphasizes voluntariness, a key social influence and contextual variable, as a ...
Factors affecting consumer stickiness to continue using mobile applications

According to a recent survey, more than half of all such apps are rarely been downloaded. This study thus examines consumer stickiness to continue to use mobile apps, using the post-acceptance model of information system continuance and technology ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information and Management

Information and Management Volume 43, Issue 6

September 2006

97 pages

ISSN:0378-7206

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 September 2006

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

285
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Lang FRiegel L(2025)Acceptance of online customer channels for damage claims in GermanyInformation Technology and Management10.1007/s10799-023-00404-z26:1(101-116)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10799-023-00404-z
Metzger ALaufer JFeit FPohl K(2024)A User Study on Explainable Online Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive SystemsACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems10.1145/366600519:3(1-44)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3666005
Auger CBoisvert AJobin KMichaud F(2024)Perception of the usefulness of socially assistive robots for adherence to home-based rehabilitation exercises for persons with chronic neurological conditionsProceedings of the 17th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3652037.3663930(515-522)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3652037.3663930
Kloft AWelsch RKosch TVilla S(2024)"AI enhances our performance, I have no doubt this one will do the same": The Placebo effect is robust to negative descriptions of AIProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642633(1-24)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642633
Ye XJo WAli ABhatti SEsterwood CKassie HRobert LGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Autonomy Acceptance Model (AAM): The Role of Autonomy and Risk in Security Robot AcceptanceProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3635005(840-849)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3635005
Winter MPryss R(2024)The effects of modular process models on gaze patterns - A follow-up investigation about modularization in process model literacyExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121176237:PAOnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121176
Hoong YRezania D(2024)Navigating Cybersecurity GovernanceComputers and Security10.1016/j.cose.2024.103852142:COnline publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.cose.2024.103852
Sara GTodde GPinna DCaria M(2024)Investigating the intention to use augmented reality technologies in agricultureComputers and Electronics in Agriculture10.1016/j.compag.2024.109252224:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109252
Leschanowsky ARech SPopp BBäckström T(2024)Evaluating privacy, security, and trust perceptions in conversational AIComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108344159:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108344
Haruyama MHidaka K(2024)What influences users to provide explicit feedback? A case of food delivery recommendersUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-023-09385-834:3(753-796)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11257-023-09385-8
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents