Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Exploring energy-performance-quality tradeoffs for scientific workflows with in-situ data analyses

Published: 01 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Power and energy are critical concerns for high performance computing systems from multiple perspectives, including cost, reliability/resilience and sustainability. At the same time, data locality and the cost of data movement have become dominating concerns in scientific workflows. One potential solution for reducing data movement costs is to use a data analysis pipeline based on in-situ data analysis.However, the energy-performance-quality tradeoffs impact of current optimizations and their overheads can be very hard to assess and understand at the application level.In this paper, we focus on exploring performance and power/energy tradeoffs of different data movement strategies and how to balance these tradeoffs with quality of solution and data speculation. Our experimental evaluation provides an empirical evaluation of different system and application configurations that give insights into the energy-performance-quality tradeoffs space for in-situ data-intensive application workflows. The key contribution of this work is a better understanding of the interactions between different computation, data movement, energy, and quality-of-result optimizations from a power-performance perspective, and a basis for modeling and exploiting these interactions.

References

[1]
Andersen DG, Franklin J, Kaminsky M, Phanishayee A, Tan L, Vasudevan V (2009) Fawn: a fast array of wimpy nodes. In: SIGOPS symposium on operating systems principles, pp 1---14
[2]
Avron H, Gupta A (2012) Managing data-movement for effective shared-memory parallelization of out-of-core sparse solvers. In: 2012 International conference for high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis (SC), pp 1---11
[3]
Balakrishnan S, Sohi GS (2006) Program demultiplexing: data-flow based speculative parallelization of methods in sequential programs. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual international symposium on computer architecture, ISCA '06, pp 302---313
[4]
Baskaran MM, Bondhugula U, Krishnamoorthy S, Ramanujam J, Rountev A, Sadayappan P (2008) Automatic data movement and computation mapping for multi-level parallel architectures with explicitly managed memories. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGPLAN symposium on principles and practice of parallel programming, PPoPP '08, pp 1---10
[5]
Bennett JC, Abbasi H, Bremer PT, Grout R et al (2012) Combining in-situ and in-transit processing to enable extreme-scale scientific analysis. In: International conference on high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis (SC), pp 49:1---49:9
[6]
Caulfield AM, Grupp LM, Swanson S (2009). Gordon: using flash memory to build fast, power-efficient clusters for data-intensive applications. In: International conference on architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, pp 217---228
[7]
Chen JH, Choudhary A, de Supinski B, DeVries M et al (2009) Terascale direct numerical simulations of turbulent combustion using s3d. Comput Sci Discov 2:1---31
[8]
Cockcroft AN (2007) Millicomputing: the coolest computers and the flashiest storage. In: International computer measurement group conference, pp 407---414
[9]
Dathathri R, Reddy C, Ramashekar T, Bondhugula U (2013) Generating efficient data movement code for heterogeneous architectures with distributed-memory. In: 2013 22nd International Conference on parallel architectures and compilation techniques (PACT), pp 375---386
[10]
Diamos G, Yalamanchili S (2010) Speculative execution on multi-GPU systems. In: 2010 IEEE international symposium on parallel distributed processing (IPDPS), pp 1---12
[11]
Dong X, Wu X, Xie Y, Chen Y, Li H (2011) Stacking MRAM atop microprocessors: an architecture-level evaluation. IET Comput Digit Tech 5(3):213---220
[12]
Donofrio D, Oliker L, Shalf J, Wehner MF, Rowen C, Krueger J, Kamil S, Mohiyuddin M (2009) Energy-efficient computing for extreme-scale science. Computer 42(11):62---71
[13]
Durillo J, Nae V, Prodan R (2013) Multi-objective workflow scheduling: an analysis of the energy efficiency and makespan tradeoff. In: 2013 13th IEEE/ACM international symposium on cluster, cloud and grid computing (CCGrid), pp 203---210
[14]
Gamell M, Rodero I, Parashar M, Bennett J et al (2013) Exploring power behaviors and tradeoffs of in-situ data analytics. In: International conference on high performance computing networking, storage and analysis (SC). Denver, CO, pp 1---12
[15]
Gamell M, Rodero I, Parashar M, Poole S (2013) Exploring energy and performance behaviors of data-intensive scientific workflows on systems with deep memory hierarchies. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on high performance computing (HiPC), pp 1---10
[16]
Hammond L, Willey M, Olukotun K (1998) Data speculation support for a chip multiprocessor. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, ASPLOS VIII, pp 58---69
[17]
Kestor G, Gioiosa R, Kerbyson D, Hoisie A (2013) Quantifying the energy cost of data movement in scientific applications. In: 2013 IEEE international symposium on workload characterization (IISWC), pp 56---65
[18]
Krueger J, Donofrio D, Shalf J, Mohiyuddin M, Williams S, Oliker L, Pfreund FJ (2011) Hardware/software co-design for energy-efficient seismic modeling. In: Proceedings of 2011 international conference for high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis (SC'11), pp 73:1---73:12
[19]
Li D, De Supinski B, Schulz M, Cameron K, Nikolopoulos D (2010) Hybrid MPI/openMP power-aware computing. In: 2010 IEEE International Symposium on parallel distributed processing (IPDPS), pp 1---12
[20]
Li D, Nikolopoulos D, Cameron K, De Supinski B, Schulz M (2010) Power-aware MPI task aggregation prediction for high-end computing systems. In: 2010 IEEE international symposium on parallel distributed processing (IPDPS), pp 1---12
[21]
Li D, Vetter JS, Marin G, McCurdy C, Cira C, Liu Z, Yu W (2012) Identifying opportunities for byte-addressable non-volatile memory in extreme-scale scientific applications. In: International parallel and distributed processing symposium, pp 945---956
[22]
Lim K, Ranganathan P, Chang J, Patel C, Mudge T, Reinhardt S (2008) Understanding and designing new server architectures for emerging warehouse-computing environments. In: Annual international symposium on computer architecture, pp 315---326
[23]
Lively C, Wu X, Taylor V, Moore S, Chang HC, Cameron K (2011) Energy and performance characteristics of different parallel implementations of scientific applications on multicore systems. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 25(3):342---350
[24]
Nightingale EB, Chen PM, Flinn J (2006) Speculative execution in a distributed file system. ACM Trans Comput Syst 24(4):361---392
[25]
Perrone M, Liu LK, Lu L, Magerlein K, Kim C, Fedulova I, Semenikhin A (2012) Reducing data movement costs: scalable seismic imaging on blue gene. In: 2012 IEEE 26th international parallel distributed processing symposium (IPDPS), pp 320---329
[26]
Rivoire S, Shah MA, Ranganathan P, Kozyrakis C (2007) Joulesort: a balanced energy-efficiency benchmark. In: SIGMOD international conference on management of data, pp 365---376
[27]
Rodero I, Chandra S, Parashar M, Muralidhar R, Seshadri H, Poole S (2010) Investigating the potential of application-centric aggressive power management for HPC workloads. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on high performance computing (HiPC). Goa, India, pp 1---10
[28]
Rountree B, Lownenthal DK, de Supinski BR, Schulz M, Freeh VW, Bletsch T (2009) Adagio: making DVS practical for complex hpc applications. In: International conference on supercomputing, pp 460---469
[29]
Tian C, Feng M, Nagarajan V, Gupta R (2008) Copy or discard execution model for speculative parallelization on multicores. In: Proceedings of the 41st annual IEEE/ACM international symposium on microarchitecture, MICRO 41, pp 330---341
[30]
Yan Y, Zhao J, Guo Y, Sarkar V (2010) Hierarchical place trees: a portable abstraction for task parallelism and data movement. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on languages and compilers for parallel computing. LCPC'09. Springer, Berlin, pp 172---187
[31]
Yoon DH, Gonzalez T, Ranganathan P, Schreiber RS (2012) Exploring latency-power tradeoffs in deep nonvolatile memory hierarchies. In: Conference on computing frontiers, pp 95---102

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Workflow Roofline Model for End-to-End Workflow Performance AnalysisProceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage, and Analysis10.1109/SC41406.2024.00071(1-15)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computer Science - Research and Development
Computer Science - Research and Development  Volume 30, Issue 2
May 2015
118 pages

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2015

Author Tags

  1. Data speculation
  2. Data staging
  3. In-situ data analysis
  4. Power/performance tradeoffs

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Workflow Roofline Model for End-to-End Workflow Performance AnalysisProceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage, and Analysis10.1109/SC41406.2024.00071(1-15)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2024

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media