Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Managing Supply Chain Demand Variability with Scheduled Ordering Policies

Published: 01 June 1999 Publication History

Abstract

This paper studies supply chain demand variability in a model with one supplier and Nretailers that face stochastic demand. Retailers implement scheduled ordering policies: Orders occur at fixed intervals and are equal to some multiple of a fixed batch size. A method is presented that exactly evaluates costs. Previous research demonstrates that the supplier's demand variance declines as the retailers' order intervals are balanced, i.e., the same number of retailers order each period. This research shows that the supplier's demand variance will generally decline as the retailers' order interval is lengthened or as their batch size is increased. Lower supplier demand variance can certainly lead to lower inventory at the supplier. This paper finds that reducing supplier demand variance with scheduled ordering policies can also lower total supply chain costs.

References

[1]
Agrawal, N., S. A. Smith. 1994. Estimating negative binomial demand for retail inventory management with lost sales. Naval Res. Logistics 43 839-861.
[2]
Aviv, Y., A. Federgruen. 1998. The operational benefits of information sharing and vendor managed inventory (VMI) programs. Working Paper, Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
[3]
Axsater, S. 1993. Exact and approximate evaluation of batch-ordering policies for two-level inventory systems. Oper. Res. 41 777-785.
[4]
Cachon, G. 1995. Exact evaluation of batch-ordering policies in two-echelon supply chains with periodic review. Working Paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC.
[5]
Cachon, G., M. Fisher. 1997. Campbell soup's continuous product replenishment program: evaluation and enhanced decision rules. Production and Oper. Management 6 266-276.
[6]
Cachon, G., M. Lariviere. 1996. Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance. Forthcoming in Management Sci.
[7]
Chen, F., J. Ryan, D. Simchi-Levi. 1997. The impact of exponential smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect. Working Paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
[8]
Chen, F., R. Samroengraja. 1996. A staggered ordering policy for one-warehouse multi-retailer systems. Forthcoming in Oper. Res.
[9]
Chen, F., Y.-S. Zheng. 1997. One-warehouse multi-retailer systems with centralized stock information. Oper. Res. 45 275-287.
[10]
Cohen, M., M. Baganha. 1998. The stabilizing effect of inventory in supply chains. Oper. Res. 46 S72-S83.
[11]
Deuermeyer, B. L., L. B. Schwarz. 1981. A model for the analysis of system service level in warehouse-retailer distribution systems: the identical retailer case. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences 16 163-193.
[12]
Drezner, Z., J. Ryan, D. Simchi-Levi. 1996. Quantifying the bullwhip effect: the impact of forecasting, leadtime and information. Working Paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
[13]
Eppen, G., L. Schrage. 1981. Centralized ordering policies in a multi-warehouse system with lead times and random demands. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences 16 51-67.
[14]
Federgruen, A., P. Zipkin. 1984. Computational issues in an infinite-horizon, multiechelon inventory model. Oper. Res. 32 818-836.
[15]
Graves, S. 1996. A multiechelon inventory model with fixed replenishment intervals. Management Sci. 42 1-18.
[16]
Hart, C. 1995. Internal guarantee. Harvard Bus. Rev. Jan-Feb. 64-71.
[17]
Jackson, P. L. 1988. Stock allocation in a two-echelon distribution system or 'What to do until your ship comes in'. Management Sci. 34 880-895.
[18]
Jackson, P. L., J. A. Muckstadt. 1989. Risk pooling in a two-period, two-echelon inventory stocking and allocation problem. Naval Res. Logistics 36 1-26.
[19]
Lee, H., C. Billington. 1992. Managing supply chain inventory: pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Management Rev. 33 65-73.
[20]
Lee, H., P. Padmanabhan, S. Whang. 1997. Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43 546-558.
[21]
Lee, H., K. C. So, C. Tang. 1996. Supply chain re-engineering through information sharing and replenishment coordination. Working Paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
[22]
Maxwell, W., J. Muckstadt. 1985. Establishing consistent and realistic reorder intervals in production-distribution systems. Oper. Res. 33 1316-1341.
[23]
McGavin, E., L. Schwarz, J. Ward. 1993. Two-interval inventory allocation policies in a one-warehouse N-identical retailer distribution system. Management Sci. 39 1092-1107.
[24]
Nahmias, S., S. A. Smith. 1994. Optimizing inventory levels in a two echelon retailer system with partial lost sales. Management Sci. 40 582-596.
[25]
Roundy, R. 1985. 98%-effective integer ratio lot-sizing for one-warehouse multi-retailer systems. Management Sci. 31 1416-1430.
[26]
Shapiro, R., J. Byrnes. 1992. Intercompany operating ties: unlocking the value in channel restructuring. Working Paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.
[27]
Svoronos, A., P. Zipkin. 1988. Estimating the performance of multilevel inventory systems. Oper. Res. 36 57-72.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Management Science
Management Science  Volume 45, Issue 6
June 1999
134 pages

Publisher

INFORMS

Linthicum, MD, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 1999

Author Tags

  1. bullwhip effect
  2. multi-echelon inventory
  3. supply chain management

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Variations of the Bullwhip Effect Across Foreign SubsidiariesManufacturing & Service Operations Management10.1287/msom.2022.113725:1(1-18)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2022)An Operations Approach for Reducing Glycemic VariabilityManufacturing & Service Operations Management10.1287/msom.2022.108924:3(1474-1493)Online publication date: 1-May-2022
  • (2017)Measuring the Bullwhip EffectManufacturing & Service Operations Management10.1287/msom.2016.059019:1(36-51)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
  • (2015)Optimizing Reorder Intervals for Two-Echelon Distribution Systems with Stochastic DemandOperations Research10.5555/3215696.321571463:2(458-475)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2015
  • (2015)Optimizing Reorder Intervals for Two-Echelon Distribution Systems with Stochastic DemandOperations Research10.5555/3215679.321569563:2(458-475)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2015
  • (2015)Optimizing Reorder Intervals for Two-Echelon Distribution Systems with Stochastic DemandOperations Research10.5555/3215661.321567762:2(458-475)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2015
  • (2015)Optimizing Reorder Intervals for Two-Echelon Distribution Systems with Stochastic DemandOperations Research10.1287/opre.2015.134763:2(458-475)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2015
  • (2012)Bullwhip Effect Measurement and Its ImplicationsOperations Research10.1287/opre.1120.107460:4(771-784)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012
  • (2010)Optimal and Heuristic Echelon (r, nQ, T) Policies in Serial Inventory Systems with Fixed CostsOperations Research10.1287/opre.1090.073458:2(414-427)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2010
  • (2010)A Power-of-Two Ordering Policy for One-Warehouse Multiretailer Systems with Stochastic DemandOperations Research10.1287/opre.1090.070758:2(492-502)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2010
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media