Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Older Adults' Collaborative Learning Dynamics When Exploring Feature-Rich Software

Published: 26 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Collaborative learning has been suggested as a promising approach to help older adults learn new technology, however, its effectiveness has been understudied in the context of feature-rich applications. We conducted an observational study with the aim of identifying aspects of collaborative learning, including characteristics of collaborative partners, that impact older adults' exploratory learning behaviour in feature-rich software. We recruited 22 participants (6 younger adults and 16 older adults) who formed 5 same-age and 6 mixed-age dyads. These dyads worked together remotely to explore a feature-rich application, which was new to them. We classified dyadic interactions into four different collaboration dynamics characterized by distinct attributes. We discovered that effective communication and the ability to navigate the software independently enabled a successful collaboration dynamic that empowered learners. We showed that trust between partners enabled effective communication and we observed that the existing relationship between partners strongly impacted their communication patterns. The more complicated study tasks required participants to validate the correctness of their work and this validation was particularly difficult for some novice older adults who did not benefit from transfer learning and struggled with navigation issues.

Supplemental Material

ZIP File
Paper title: Older Adults' Collaborative Learning Dynamics When Exploring Feature-Rich Software The Supplemental Materials (one PDF file) include: - Appendix A: Pre-study Questionnaire - Appendix B: Task in Contextual Orientation session, interactive build mode - Appendix C: Post-stuyd questionnaire - Appendix D: Interview Questions - Appendix E: Task set 1-3 in design tasks session - Appendix F: Participants' level of tech comfort (pre-study questionnaire) - Appendix G: Codes of open coding, dyadic interaction

References

[1]
Thomas A. Arcury, Joanne C. Sandberg, Kathryn P. Melius, Sara A. Quandt, Xiaoyan Leng, Celine Latulipe, David P. Miller, D. Alden Smith, and Alain G. Bertoni. 2020. Older Adult Internet Use and eHealth Literacy. Journal of Applied Gerontology 39, 2 (February 2020), 141--150.
[2]
Yvonne Barnard, Mike D. Bradley, Frances Hodgson, and Ashley D. Lloyd. 2013. Learning to use new technologies by older adults: Perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Comput Human Behav 29, 4 (July 2013), 1715--1724.
[3]
Hannah Barrie, Tara la Rose, Brian Detlor, Heidi Julien, and Alexander Serenko. 2021. ?Because I'm Old": The Role of Ageism in Older Adults' Experiences of Digital Literacy Training in Public Libraries. J Technol Hum Serv 39, 4 (2021), 379--404.
[4]
Barbara Baschiera and Willem de Meyer. 2016. Support of active ageing through P2P learning. Journal of Education Culture and Society 7, 1 (2016), 180--192.
[5]
Jacob T. Biehl, Rosta Farzan, and Yingfan Zhou. 2022. Can Anybody Help Me?: Using Community Help Desk Call Records to Examine the Impact of Digital Divides During a Global Pandemic. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Association for Computing Machinery.
[6]
Walter R. Boot, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, Joseph Sharit, Wendy A. Rogers, Arthur D. Fisk, Tracy Mitzner, Chin Chin Lee, and Sankaran Nair. 2015. Computer Proficiency Questionnaire: Assessing Low and High Computer Proficient Seniors. Gerontologist 55, 3 (June 2015), 404--411.
[7]
Ur?a Bratun and Joca Zurc. 2022. The motives of people who delay retirement: An occupational perspective. Scand J Occup Ther 29, 6 (August 2022), 482--494.
[8]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
[9]
Tim Broady, Amy Chan, and Peter Caputi. 2010. Comparison of older and younger adults' attitudes towards and abilities with computers: Implications for training and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 41, 3 (2010), 473--485.
[10]
Andrea Bunt, Patrick Dubois, Ben Lafreniere, Michael A. Terry, and David T. Cormack. 2014. TaggedComments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4037--4046.
[11]
Parmit K. Chilana, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2011. Modern software product support processes and the usage of multimedia formats. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2011), 3093--3102.
[12]
Parmit K. Chilana, Nathaniel Hudson, Srinjita Bhaduri, Prashant Shashikumar, and Shaun Kane. 2018. Supporting remote real-time expert help: Opportunities and challenges for novice 3d modelers. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, VL/HCC, IEEE Computer Society, 157--166.
[13]
Parmit K. Chilana, Amy J. Ko, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2012. LemonAid. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1549--1558.
[14]
Eun Young Choi, Youngsun Kim, Edson Chipalo, and Hee Yun Lee. 2020. Does Perceived Ageism Widen the Digital Divide? And Does It Vary by Gender? Gerontologist 60, 7 (September 2020), 1213--1223.
[15]
Puay Hoe Chua, Younbo Jung, May O. Lwin, and Yin Leng Theng. 2013. Let's play together: Effects of video-game play on intergenerational perceptions among youth and elderly participants. Comput Human Behav 29, 6 (2013), 2303--2311.
[16]
Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2012. Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (April 2012).
[17]
Andy Crabtree, Jacki O'Neill, Peter Tolmie, Stefania Castellani, Tommaso Colombino, and Antonietta Grasso. 2006. The practical indispensability of articulation work to immediate and remote help-giving. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, 219--228.
[18]
Catherine J. Crompton, Maria K. Wolters, and Sarah E. MacPherson. 2022. Learning with friends and strangers: partner familiarity does not improve collaborative learning performance in younger and older adults. Memory 30, 5 (May 2022), 636--649.
[19]
Yibo Dai, George Karalis, Saba Kawas, and Christopher Olsen. 2015. Tipper: Contextual tooltips that provide seniors with clear, reliable help for web tasks. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Association for Computing Machinery, 1773--1778.
[20]
Jennifer Dickman Portz, ; Christine Fruhauf, ; Sheana Bull, Rebecca S Boxer, David B Bekelman, Alejandra Casillas, ; Kathy Gleason, and Elizabeth A Bayliss. ?Call a Teenager? That's What I Do!"-Grandchildren Help Older Adults Use New Technologies: Qualitative Study.
[21]
Pierre Dillenbourg. Chapter 1 (Introduction) What do you mean by ?collaborative learning"? Cellulo for Stroke Rehabilitation View project CoReader View project Pierre Dillenbourg École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne What do you mean by ?collaborative learning"? Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240632230
[22]
Volodymyr Dziubak, Patrick Dubois, Andrea Bunt, and Michael Terry. 2016. Switter. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1209--1220.
[23]
Volodymyr Dziubak, Ben Lafreniere, Tovi Grossman, Andrea Bunt, and George Fitzmaurice. 2018. Maestro: Designing a system for real-time orchestration of 3D modeling workshops. In UIST 2018 - Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 287--298.
[24]
Jessica Francis, Travis Kadylak, Taj W. Makki, R. v. Rikard, and Shelia R. Cotten. 2018. Catalyst to Connection: When Technical Difficulties Lead to Social Support for Older Adults. American Behavioral Scientist 62, 9 (August 2018), 1167--1185.
[25]
C. Ailie Fraser, Mira Dontcheva, Holger Winnemöller, Sheryl Ehrlich, and Scott Klemmer. 2016. DiscoverySpace: Suggesting actions in complex software. DIS 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Fuse (June 2016), 1221--1232.
[26]
Shannon Freeman, Hannah R. Marston, Janna Olynick, Charles Musselwhite, Cory Kulczycki, Rebecca Genoe, and Beibei Xiong. 2020. Intergenerational Effects on the Impacts of Technology Use in Later Life: Insights from an International, Multi-Site Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, Vol. 17, Page 5711 17, 16 (August 2020), 5711.
[27]
Christian Geppert, Yvan Guillemette, Hermes Morgavi, and David Turner. Labour supply of older people in advance economies: the impact of changes to statutory retirement ages.
[28]
Emmanouil Giannisakis, Jessalyn Alvina, Andrea Bunt, Parmit Chilana, and Joanna McGrenere. 2022. Promoting Feature Awareness by Leveraging Collaborators' Usage Habits in Collaborative Editors. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW (March 2022), 955--965.
[29]
Tovi Grossman, George Fitzmaurice, and Ramtin Attar. 2009. A survey of software learnability: Metrics, methodologies and guidelines. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2009), 649--658.
[30]
Amanda Hunsaker, Minh Hao Nguyen, Jaelle Fuchs, Teodora Djukaric, Larissa Hugentobler, and Eszter Hargittai. 2019. ?He Explained It to Me and I Also Did It Myself": How Older Adults Get Support with Their Technology Uses. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119887866 5, (December 2019), 1--13.
[31]
Amanda Hunsaker, Minh Hao Nguyen, Jaelle Fuchs, Gökçe Karaoglu, Teodora Djukaric, and Eszter Hargittai. 2020. Unsung helpers: older adults as a source of digital media support for their peers. Communication Review 23, 4 (2020), 309--330.
[32]
Nikhita Joshi, Justin Matejka, Fraser Anderson, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2020. MicroMentor: Peer-to-Peer Software Help Sessions in Three Minutes or Less. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (April 2020).
[33]
Kimia Kiani, Parmit K. Chilana, Andrea Bunt, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2020. ?I Would Just Ask Someone": Learning Feature-Rich Design Software in the Modern Workplace. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, VL/HCC 2020-August, (August 2020).
[34]
Hanna Köttl, Vera Gallistl, Rebekka Rohner, and Liat Ayalon. 2021. ?But at the age of 85? Forget it!": Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. J Aging Stud 59, (2021), 100971.
[35]
Teresa de la Hera, Eugène Loos, Monique Simons, and Joleen Blom. 2017. Benefits and factors influencing the design of intergenerational digital games: A systematic literature review. Societies 7, 3 (September 2017).
[36]
Ben Lafreniere and Tovi Grossman. 2018. Blocks-to-CAD: A cross-application bridge from minecraft to 3D modeling. UIST 2018 - Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (October 2018), 637--648.
[37]
Ben Lafreniere, Tovi Grossman, Justin Matejka, and George Fitzmaurice. 2014. Investigating the feasibility of extracting tool demonstrations from in-situ video content. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2014), 4007--4016.
[38]
Benjamin Lafreniere, Andrea Bunt, and Michael Terry. 2014. Task-centric interfaces for feature - Rich software. Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 2014 (December 2014), 49--58.
[39]
Benjamin Lafreniere, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2013. Community enhanced tutorials. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1779--1788.
[40]
Wei Li, Tovi Grossman, Justin Matejka, and George Fitzmaurice. 2011. TwitApp: In-product micro-blogging for design sharing. UIST'11 - Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2011), 185--194.
[41]
Dara L. LoBuono, Skye N. Leedahl, and Elycia Maiocco. 2019. Older adults learning technology in an intergenerational program: Qualitative analysis of areas of technology requested for assistance. Gerontechnology 18, 2 (2019), 97--107.
[42]
Qi Ma, Alan H.S. Chan, and Pei Lee Teh. 2020. Bridging the digital divide for older adults via observational training: Effects of model identity from a generational perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12, 11 (2020), 1--24.
[43]
Shareen Mahmud, Jessalyn Alvina, Parmit K. Chilana, Andrea Bunt, and Joanna McGrenere. 2020. Learning Through Exploration: How Children, Adults, and Older Adults Interact with a New Feature-Rich Application. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Association for Computing Machinery.
[44]
Will Marler and Eszter Hargittai. 2022. Division of digital labor: Partner support for technology use among older adults. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068437 (January 2022).
[45]
Justin Matejka, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2011. IP-QAT: In-product questions, answers & tips. UIST'11 - Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2011), 175--184.
[46]
Justin Matejka, Wei Li, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2009. CommunityCommands: Command Recommendations for Software Applications. Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (2009).
[47]
Joanna McGrenere, Ronald M. Baecker, and Kellogg S. Booth. 2007. A field evaluation of an adaptable two-interface design for feature-rich software. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 14, 1 (May 2007).
[48]
Joanna Mcgrenere and Gale Moore. 2000. Are We All In the Same ?Bloat"?
[49]
Tamir Mendel. 2019. Social Help: Developing Methods to Support Older Adults in Mobile Privacy and Security. Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (2019).
[50]
Martin Mihajlov, Mark Springett, and Effie Lai Chong Law. 2019. Learning to drag: The effects of social interactions in touch gestures learnability for older adults. In ISS 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 205--215.
[51]
Pablo Morales, Melissa E. Moss, and Ulrich Mayr. 2022. Age Differences in the Recovery From Interruptions. Psychol Aging 37, 7 (September 2022), 816--826.
[52]
Emerson Murphy-Hill, Da Young Lee, Gail C. Murphy, and Joanna McGrenere. 2015. How Do Users Discover New Tools in Software Development and Beyond? Comput Support Coop Work 24, 5 (October 2015), 389--422.
[53]
Behnaz Norouzi, Marianne Kinnula, and Netta Iivari. 2021. Making sense of 3d modelling and 3d printing activities of young people a nexus analytic inquiry. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Association for Computing Machinery.
[54]
Carolyn Pang, Zhiqin Collin Wang, and Joanna McGrenere. 2021. Technology adoption and learning preferences for older adults: Evolving perceptions, ongoing challenges, and emerging design opportunities. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Association for Computing Machinery.
[55]
Patrick Pilipiec, Wim Groot, and Milena Pavlova. 2021. The Effect of an Increase of the Retirement Age on the Health, Well-Being, and Labor Force Participation of Older Workers: a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Population Ageing 14, 271--315.
[56]
Erika Shehan Poole, Marshini Chetty, Tom Morgan, Rebecca E Grinter, and W Keith Edwards. 2009. Computer Help at Home: Methods and Motivations for Informal Technical Support. (2009).
[57]
Alex Quinn, Ben Bederson, Elizabeth Bonsignore, and Allison Druin. 2009. StoryKit: Designing a Mobile Application for Story Creation By Children And Older Adults. (2009), 1--10.
[58]
Vidya Ramesh, Charlie Hsu, Maneesh Agrawala, and Björn Hartmann. 2011. ShowMeHow: Translating user interface instructions between similar applications. UIST'11 - Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2011), 127--134.
[59]
Karen Renaud and Judy van Biljon. 2008. Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: A qualitative study. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 338, September 2014 (2008), 210--219.
[60]
Mitchel Resnick and Ben Shneiderman. 2005. Design Principles for Tools to Support Creative Thinking.
[61]
Mark Rice, Wah Pheow Tan, Jeremy Ong, Lih Jie Yau, Marcus Wan, and Jamie Ng. 2013. The dynamics of younger and older adult's paired behavior when playing an interactive silhouette game. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2013), 1081--1090.
[62]
John Rieman. 1996. A Field Study of Exploratory Learning Strategies.
[63]
Anthony V. Robins Sally A. Fincher. 2020. The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research.
[64]
Sergio Sayago, Paula Forbes, and Josep Blat. 2013. Older People Becoming Successful ICT Learners Over Time: Challenges and Strategies Through an Ethnographical Lens. Educ Gerontol 39, 7 (July 2013), 527--544.
[65]
Neil Selwyn, Stephen Gorard, John Furlong, and Louise Madden. 2003. Older adults' use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing Soc 23, 5 (September 2003), 561--582.
[66]
Vandana Singh, Michael B. Twidale, and Dinesh Rathi. 2006. Open source technical support: A look at peer help-giving. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[67]
M. Springett, M. Mihajlov, E. Brzovska, M. Orozel, V. Elsner, S. Oppl, C. Stary, S. Keith, and J. Richardson. 2022. An analysis of social interaction between novice older adults when learning gesture-based skills through simple digital games. Univers Access Inf Soc 21, 3 (August 2022), 639--655.
[68]
Tiina Tambaum. 2017. Teenaged Internet tutors' use of scaffolding with older learners. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education 23, 1 (May 2017), 97--118.
[69]
Xinru Tang, Xin Tong, Yuling Sun, Bowen Zhang, Zimi Liu, and Zhicong Lu. 2022. ''I Never Imagined Grandma Could Do So Well with Technology'': Evolving Roles of Younger Family Members in Older Adults' Technology Learning and Use; ''I Never Imagined Grandma Could Do So Well with Technology'': Evolving Roles of Younger Family Members in Older Adults' Technology Learning and Use. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact 6, CSCW2 (2022), 478.
[70]
Hsin Yi Sandy Tsai, R. V. Rikard, Shelia R. Cotten, and Ruth Shillair. 2019. Senior technology exploration, learning, and acceptance (STELA) model: from exploration to use--a longitudinal randomized controlled trial. Educ Gerontol 45, 12 (December 2019), 728--743.
[71]
Jui Che Tu and Yu Hsien Chiang. 2016. The Influence of Design Strategy of Peer Learning on 3-D Software Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 12, 5 (March 2016), 1263--1271.
[72]
Michael B. Twidale. 2005. Over the shoulder learning: Supporting brief informal learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 14, 6 (November 2005), 505--547.
[73]
Nicole Wagner, Khaled Hassanein, and Milena Head. 2010. Computer use by older adults: A multi-disciplinary review. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 870--882.
[74]
Bo Xie. 2007. Information technology education for older adults as a continuing peer-learning process: A Chinese case study. Educ Gerontol 33, 5 (2007), 429--450.
[75]
Liming Zhang, Paul Ayres, and KaKin Chan. 2011. Examining different types of collaborative learning in a complex computer-based environment: A cognitive load approach. Comput Human Behav 27, 1 (January 2011), 94--98.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Diversity Challenges in Recruiting for Human-Centered Explainable AI Studies2024 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00067(429-431)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024

Index Terms

  1. Older Adults' Collaborative Learning Dynamics When Exploring Feature-Rich Software

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
    CSCW
    April 2024
    6294 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3661497
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 April 2024
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. collaboration
    2. collaboration dynamics
    3. exploratory learning
    4. feature-rich software
    5. older adults

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)81
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Diversity Challenges in Recruiting for Human-Centered Explainable AI Studies2024 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00067(429-431)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media