“I just embodied you”: Psychological Ownership of Personalized Photorealistic Avatars
Authors: 
Alicia G Cork, Anca Salagean, Laura G. E. Smith, David A Ellis, Adam Joinson, Danaë Stanton FraserAuthors Info & Claims
Article No.: 386, Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
Developing and using personalized photorealistic avatars in research settings poses novel challenges for research ethics procedures. These challenges stem from the highly identifiable nature of avatars, which are imbued with the users’ identities. This study examines how individuals, who have had personalized photorealistic avatars created for participation in multiple research experiments, relate to their avatars when not embodying them. In three focus groups (N=9), we use hypothetical scenarios to explore avatar ownership. Using thematic analysis, we identify three themes that encapsulate individuals’ psychological sense of ownership of and connection to their avatars: i) the desire for control over the avatar, ii) the entangled relationship between user and avatar identities, and iii) feelings towards the avatar. From these themes, we suggest three recommendations for enhancing future ethical procedures, emphasizing transparency, access, control, and consent, and discuss factors limiting the generalizability of our results.
Supplemental Material
MP4 File
Talk Video
- Download
- 55.71 MB
- Transcript
PDF File - Interview Schedule
The file in this folder shows the interview schedule for the paper '?I just embodied you?: Psychological Ownership of Personalized Photorealistic Avatars'
- Download
- 76.20 KB
References
[1]
James B. Avey, Bruce J. Avolio, Craig D. Crossley, and Fred Luthans. 2009. Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior 30, 2 (2009), 173–191.
[2]
Domna Banakou, Parasuram D. Hanumanthu, and Mel Slater. 2016. Virtual embodiment of white people in a black virtual body leads to a sustained reduction in their implicit racial bias. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10 (2016).
[3]
Domna Banakou, Sameer Kishore, and Mel Slater. 2018. Virtually being Einstein results in an improvement in cognitive task performance and a decrease in age bias. Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018).
[4]
BBC. 2023. Actors’ strike ends: Which films will resume production. (November 2023). Retrieved January 22, 2024 from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-67373299
[5]
Elena Bolt, Jasmine T. Ho, Marte Roel Lesur, Alexander Soutschek, Philippe N. Tobler, and Bigna Lenggenhager. 2021. Effects of a virtual gender swap on social and temporal decision-making. Scientific Reports 11, 1 (2021).
[6]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
[7]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic Analysis. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. (2012), 57–71.
[8]
Isabel Fitton, Christopher Clarke, Jeremy Dalton, Michael J Proulx, and Christof Lutteroth. 2023. Dancing with the Avatars: Minimal Avatar Customisation Enhances Learning in a Psychomotor Task. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '23), April 23-28, 2023, Hamburg, Germany. ACM, New York, NY, USA 16 Pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580944
[9]
E. Tory Higgins. 1987. Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 94, 3 (1987), 319–340.
[10]
Konstantina Kilteni, Raphaela Groten, and Mel Slater. 2012. The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 21, 4 (2012), 373–387.
[11]
Konstantina Kilteni, Antonella Maselli, Konrad P. Kording, and Mel Slater. 2015. Over my fake body: Body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 (2015).
[12]
Yao Li and Xinning Gui. 2022. Examining co-owners’ privacy consideration in collaborative photo sharing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 31, 1 (2022), 79–109.
[13]
Michael Madary and Thomas K. Metzinger. 2016. Recommendations for good scientific practice and the consumers of VR-Technology. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3 (2016).
[14]
Lara Maister, Mel Slater, Maria V. Sanchez-Vives, and Manos Tsakiris. 2015. Changing Bodies Changes Minds: Owning another body affects social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19, 1 (2015), 6–12.
[15]
Catherine C. Marshall and Frank M. Shipman. 2011. Social media ownership: using twitter as a window onto current attitudes and beliefs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1081-1090. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979103
[16]
Catherine C. Marshall and Frank M. Shipman. 2011. The ownership and reuse of visual media. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries (JCDL '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1145/1998076.1998108
[17]
Catherine C. Marshall and Frank M. Shipman. 2012. On the institutional archiving of social media. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2232817.2232819
[18]
Catherine C. Marshall and Frank M. Shipman. 2013. Saving, reusing, and remixing web video: using attitudes and practices to reveal social norms. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web (WWW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 885-896. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488465
[19]
Antonella Maselli and Mel Slater. 2013. The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (2013).
[20]
Aske Mottelson 2021. A self-administered virtual reality intervention increases COVID-19 vaccination intention. Vaccine 39, 46 (2021), 6746–6753.
[21]
Aske Mottelson, Andreea Muresan, Kasper Hornbæk, and Guido Makransky. 2023. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of body ownership illusions in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 30, 5 (2023), 1–42.
[22]
Jon L. Pierce, Tatiana Kostova, and Kurt T. Dirks. 2001. Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. The Academy of Management Review 26, 2 (2001), 298.
[23]
Jon L. Pierce, Tatiana Kostova, and Kurt T. Dirks. 2003. The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology 7, 1 (2003), 84–107.
[24]
Jon L. Pierce, Stephen A. Rubenfeld, and Susan Morgan. 1991. Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. The Academy of Management Review 16, 1 (1991), 121.
[25]
Edwina L. Rissland and Kevin D. Ashley. 1986. Hypotheticals as heuristic device. Proceedings of the workshop on Strategic computing natural language - HLT ’86 (1986).
[26]
Anca Salagean, Eleanor Crellin, Martin Parsons, Darren Cosker, and Danaë Stanton Fraser. 2023. Meeting Your Virtual Twin: Effects of Photorealism and Personalization on Embodiment, Self-Identification and Perception of Self-Avatars in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 499, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581182
[27]
Mel Slater 2020. The ethics of realism in virtual and augmented reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 1 (2020).
[28]
Adam Tapal, Ela Oren, Reuven Dar, and Baruch Eitam. 2017. The sense of agency scale: A measure of consciously perceived control over one's mind, body, and the immediate environment. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017).
[29]
Florent Thouvenin, Rolf H. Weber, and Alfred Fr¨uh. 2017. Data ownership: Taking stock and mapping the issues. Frontiers in Data Science (2017), 111–145.
[30]
Thomas Waltemate, Dominik Gall, Daniel Roth, Mario Botsch, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2018. The impact of avatar personalization and immersion on virtual body ownership, presence, and emotional response. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 4 (2018), 1643–1652.
[31]
Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. 1890. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 4, 5 (1890), 193.
[32]
Florian Weidner 2023. A systematic review on the visualization of avatars and agents in AR & VR displayed using head-mounted displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 5 (2023), 2596–2606.
[33]
David White, Amy L. Burton, and Richard I. Kemp. 2015. Not looking yourself: The cost of self‐selecting photographs for identity verification. British Journal of Psychology 107, 2 (2015), 359–373.
[34]
Nick Yee and Jeremy Bailenson. 2007. The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research 33, 3 (2007), 271–290.
[35]
Eduard Zell, Katja Zibrek, and Rachel McDonnell. 2019. Perception of virtual characters. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Courses (SIGGRAPH '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 21, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3305366.3328101
[36]
Katja Zibrek, Sean Martin, and Rachel McDonnell. 2019. Is photorealism important for perception of expressive virtual humans in virtual reality? ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 16, 3, Article 14 (Sept. 2019), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349609
Index Terms
- “I just embodied you”: Psychological Ownership of Personalized Photorealistic Avatars
Recommendations
Miniature Haptics: Experiencing Haptic Feedback through Hand-based and Embodied Avatars
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe present Miniature Haptics, a new approach to providing realistic haptic experiences by applying miniaturized haptic feedback to hand-based, embodied avatars. By shrinking haptics to a much smaller scale, Miniature Haptics enables the exploration of ...
Hybrid avatars: enabling co-presence in multiple realities
Web3D '16: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Web3D TechnologyVirtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies are quickly making their way into people's everyday lives. Typically, these technologies are used separately to create either plain VR or AR applications rather than harnessing the ...
Observing Virtual Avatars: The Impact of Avatars’ Fidelity on Identifying Interactions
Academic Mindtrek '21: Proceedings of the 24th International Academic Mindtrek ConferenceThere are many cases where observing the interactions of a virtual avatar can be useful. However, it is unclear to what extent the avatar fidelity affects bystanders’ performance when observing gestures performed by avatars. We, therefore, conducted an ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2024
4761 pages
ISBN:9798400703317
DOI:10.1145/3613905
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 11 May 2024
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Work in progress
- Research
- Refereed limited
Data Availability
Interview Schedule: The file in this folder shows the interview schedule for the paper '?I just embodied you?: Psychological Ownership of Personalized Photorealistic Avatars'https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651065#3613905.3651065-supplement-1.pdf
Interview Schedule: The file in this folder shows the interview schedule for the paper '?I just embodied you?: Psychological Ownership of Personalized Photorealistic Avatars'https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651065#3613905.3651065-supplement-1.pdf
Funding Sources
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- UK Research and Innovation
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 220Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)220
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29
Reflects downloads up to 28 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format