extended-abstract

Strengthening human autonomy in the era of autonomous technology.: Contemporary perspectives on interaction with ‘autonomous things’

Authors:

Tone Bratteteig,

Diana Saplacan,

Johanne Svanes OskarsenAuthors Info & Claims

NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

Article No.: 137, Pages 1 - 3

https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420097

Published: 26 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The aim of this workshop is to address the role that human autonomy presently receives in HCI research and how “autonomous technologies” might challenge, rather than facilitate human autonomy. We acknowledge a need for new ways of understanding HCI and interaction design as digital technologies develop in the “4th wave”. In this workshop, participants are invited to a discussion where the autonomous human-being—who can act autonomously with autonomous technologies—is emphasized, beyond simple human control to a more flexible, sophisticated, subtle, and sustainable autonomy.

References

[1]

Harrison, Phoebe Sengers, and Deborah Tatar. 2007. The Three Paradigms of HCI. Proc. of Alt.Chi, ACM.

[2]

Susanne Bødker, 2006. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles, Oslo, Norway, Oct., 1–8.

Digital Library

[3]

Susanne Bødker. 2015. Third-Wave HCI, 10 Years Later—Participation and Sharing. Interactions. ACM, 24–31.

[4]

Susanne Bødker. 2016. Rethinking technology on the boundaries of life and work. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 20, Springer, 533-544.

[5]

Emanuel Felipe Duarte and M. Cecilia Calani Baranauskas. 2016. Revisiting the Three HCI Waves: A Preliminary Discussion on Philosophy of Science and Research Paradigms. Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, São Paulo, Brazil, Oct., 1–4.

Digital Library

[6]

Philip Agre. 1997. Computation, and human experience. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

[7]

Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

[8]

Lucy Suchman. 1987. Plans, and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press.

[9]

Lucy Suchman 2007. Agencies in technology design: feminist reconfigurations. Lancaster University.

[10]

Terry Winograd, Ed., Bringing design to software. New York, N.Y.: Reading, Mass: ACM Press; Addison- Wesley, 1996.

[11]

Lars-Erik Janlert and Erik Stolterman 2017. Things that keep us busy: the elements of interaction. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Digital Library

[12]

Christopher Frauenberger. 2019. Entanglement HCI The Next Wave? ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. TOCHI 27 (1): 1–27.

Digital Library

[13]

Umer Farooq and Jonathan Grudin. 2016. Human-computer integration,” Interactions 23 (6): 26–32.

Digital Library

[14]

Florian Floyd Mueller 2020. Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration. Proc. of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1–15.

Digital Library

[15]

Michel Beaudouin-Lafon and Wendy E. Mackay. 2018. Rethinking Interaction: From Instrumental Interaction to Human-Computer Partnerships. Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal QC, Canada, 1–5.

Digital Library

[16]

Ben Shneiderman, Catherine Plaisant, Maxine Cohen, Steven Jacobs, Niklas Elmqvist, and Nicholaos Diakopoulos. 2016. Grand challenges for HCI researchers. Interactions 23 (5): 24–25.

Digital Library

[17]

Susanne Bødker and Morten Kyng. 2018. Participatory Design that Matters—Facing the Big Issues. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25 (1): 4:1–4:31.

Digital Library

[18]

Liam Bannon, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Susanne Bødker. 2018. Introduction: Reimagining Participatory Design—Emerging Voices. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, no. 1, p. 1:1–1:8, Feb. 2018.

Digital Library

[19]

Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, Robert R. Hoffman, David D. Woods, and Matthew Johnson, “The Seven Deadly Myths of ‘Autonomous Systems,’” IEEE Intell. Syst. 28, (3): 54–61.

Digital Library

[20]

Rebekka Soma and Jo Herstad. 2018. Turning Away from an Anthropocentric View on Robotics. Envisioning Robots in Society – Power, Politics, and Public Space: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2018 / TRANSOR 2018, vol. 311, M. Coeckelbergh, J. Loh, and M. Funk, Eds. Wien, Austria: IOS Pres. 53–62.

[21]

Rebekka Soma, Vegard Dønnem Søyseth, Magnus Søyland, and Trenton Schulz. 2018. Facilitating Robots at Home: A Framework for Understanding Robot Facilitation,” Mar. 2018. 1–6: https://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=achi_2018_1_10_20085.

[22]

Johanne Svanes Oskarsen. 2018. Human-supported robot work. Master Thesis, University of Oslo, Department of Informatics, Oslo, Norway.

[23]

Diana Saplacan and Jo Herstad. 2019. An Explorative Study on Motion as Feedback: Using Semi-Autonomous Robots in Domestic Settings. Int. J. Adv. Softw. 12 (1 & 2: 23.

[24]

Diana Saplacan, Jo Herstad, Jim Tørresen, and Zada Pajalic. 2020. Division of Work Tasks between Humans and Robots: An Instrumental Analytical Study from the Home. Multimodal Technol. Interact. J.

[25]

Guri B. Verne. 2020. Adapting to a Robot: Adapting Gardening and the Garden to fit a Robot Lawn Mower. Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 34–42.

Digital Library

[26]

Suhas Govind Joshi. 2017. Designing for Capabilities: A Phenomenological Approach to the Design of Enabling Technologies for Older Adults. PhD dissertation. University of Oslo, Department of Informatics. https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/58738.

[27]

Suhas Govind Joshi and Tone Bratteteig. 2016. Designing for Prolonged Mastery. On involving old people in Participatory Design. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 28 (1). https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/58736.

[28]

Diana Saplacan. 2020. Situated ability: A case from Higher Education on digital learning environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Ch. 19, vol. HCII 2020, M. Antona and C. Stephanidis, Eds. Springer Nature Switzerland: 1–19.

[29]

Diana Saplacan, Jo Herstad, and Trenton Schulz. Forthcoming. Situated Abilities within Universal Design - A Theoretical Exploration: The Case of The Robotic Wood Table. Int J. Adv. Intell. Syst. 13 (3 & 4): 14.

[30]

Diana Saplacan and Jo Herstad. 2019. Understanding robot motion in domestic settings. Proceedings of the 9th Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics. IEEE XPlore, Oslo. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8850695.

[31]

Tone Bratteteig and Guri B. Verne. 2012. Conditions for Autonomy in the Information Society: Disentangling as a public service. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 24 (2). http://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol24/iss2/3

Cited By

Inie NWesth BMuller JLungu M(2023)Challenges and Opportunities of Using Redirection of Activity for Self-Regulation OnlineProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581342(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581342
Cerna KMüller CHunker MHitpass FRandall D(2023)Designing for Self-directed Learning: Co-creating a Demokit with Older AdultsHuman Aspects of IT for the Aged Population10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_1(3-22)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_1

Index Terms

Strengthening human autonomy in the era of autonomous technology.: Contemporary perspectives on interaction with ‘autonomous things’
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Respecting Human Autonomy through Human-Centered AI
NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

AI is becoming more pervasive in our everyday lives and people are increasingly having to relinquish control and decision-making to “smart” systems. Concurrently, people are confronted with a reduced sense of autonomy as a result of being monitored and ...
Innovations in autonomous systems: Challenges and opportunities for human-agent collaboration
CSCW '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion

Autonomous agents are rapidly becoming collaborative partners in addressing diverse industry and social problem domains. With this shift brings a number of challenges and opportunities in understanding and designing for the dynamics involved in human ...
Do I have a say?: Using conversational agents to re-imagine human-machine autonomy
CUI '20: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces

With human-centered AI gaining traction, needs for algorithmic transparency, explainability, empathy and ethical considerations in artificial agents are forming core research issues. However, with intelligent agents getting increasingly independent and ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

October 2020

1177 pages

ISBN:9781450375795

DOI:10.1145/3419249

General Chairs:
David Lamas
Tallinn University, Estonia
,
Hegle Sarapuu
Trinidad Wiseman, Estonia
,
Publications Chairs:
Ilja Šmorgun
Tallinn University, Estonia
,
Gerd Berget
Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway

Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 October 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Extended-abstract
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

NordiCHI '20

NordiCHI '20: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

October 25 - 29, 2020

Tallinn, Estonia

Acceptance Rates

NordiCHI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 89 of 399 submissions, 22%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
179
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)34
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Inie NWesth BMuller JLungu M(2023)Challenges and Opportunities of Using Redirection of Activity for Self-Regulation OnlineProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581342(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581342
Cerna KMüller CHunker MHitpass FRandall D(2023)Designing for Self-directed Learning: Co-creating a Demokit with Older AdultsHuman Aspects of IT for the Aged Population10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_1(3-22)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_1

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents