Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3371382.3380738acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adapting to a Robot: Adapting Gardening and the Garden to fit a Robot Lawn Mower

Published: 01 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Introducing robots into the home changes the work that the homeowners carry out. This paper explores in depth how garden work and the garden change when a robotic lawn mower is introduced. The methodology in this study is autoethnography, which gives access to personal experiences and thoughts. The paper describes how the usual work of manually mowing the lawn is automated and new tasks emerge as the gardeners adapt to the robot mower. A conceptual framework is presented and used to analyse these changes. Some gardening tasks become redundant and new tasks appear, and a new urgency is added to some of the old tasks. In addition, awareness about the robot mower's movements is important to keep it active and avoid damage to the robot and things in the garden. The paper suggests that unwanted changes that become too demanding are important for user acceptance or rejection of robots in the home environment.

References

[1]
Leon Anderson .2006. Analytic Autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35(4), 373--395.
[2]
Lynne Baillie and David Benyon. 2008. Place and Technology in the Home. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 17, Iss. 2--3, 227--256.
[3]
Lisanne Bainbridge. 1983. Ironies of automation, Automatica 19(6): 775--779.
[4]
Tone Bratteteig and Ina Wagner. 2013. Moving healthcare to the home: the work to make homecare work. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2013), 21--25 September 2013, Paphos, Cyprus. Springer, London.
[5]
Elisabeth Cha, Jodi Forlizzi, and Siddharta S. Srinivasa. 2015. Robots in the Home: Qualitative and Quantitative Insights into Kitchen Organization. 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 319--326.
[6]
Ellen Christiansen and Pernille V. K. Andersen. 2013. Digital Living at Home - User Voices about Home Automation and a Home-Keeping Design Discourse. In M. Aanestad and T. Bratteteig (eds): Nordic Contributions in IS Research. SCIS 2013, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 156. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 156: 40--52.
[7]
Mike Crang and Ian Cook. 2007. Doing Ethnographies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
[8]
Julia Fink, Valérie Bauwens, Frédéric Kaplan, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2013. Living with a Vacuum Cleaning Robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 5, Iss. 3, pp. 389--408.
[9]
Jodi Forlizzi and Carl DiSalvo. 2006. Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 258--265.
[10]
Jodi Forlizzi. 2007. How robotic products become social products: an ethnographic study of cleaning in the home. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129--136.
[11]
Stacy Holman Jones, Tony E. Adams, and Carolyn Ellis. 2016. Handbook of Autoethnography, New York: Routledge.
[12]
Husquarna. 2014. Husqvarna AUTOMOWER® 305/308 operator's manual.
[13]
Donald MacKenzie. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.
[14]
Garance Maréchal. 2010. Autoethnography. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos and E. Wiebe (eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 44--45). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
[15]
Myers living version, Qualitative Research in Information Systems, https://www.qual.auckland.ac.nz/
[16]
Caroline Pantofaru, Leila Takayama, Tully Foote, and Bianca Soto. 2012. Exploring the role of robots in home organization. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 327--334.
[17]
Elpida Prasopoulou. 2017. "A half-moon on my skin: a memoir on life with an activity tracker." European Journal of Information Systems 26(3): 287--297.
[18]
Maha Salem, Gabriella Lakatos, Farshid Amirabdollahian, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2015. Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot? Effects of Error, Task Type and Personality on Human-Robot Cooperation and Trust. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 141--148.
[19]
Diana Saplacan and Jo Herstad. 2019. An Explorative Study on Motion as Feedback: Using Semi-Autonomous Robots in Domestic Settings. International Journal On Advances in Software. ISSN 1942--2628. 12(1&2): 68- 90.
[20]
Trenton Schulz, Jim Torresen, and Jo Herstad. 2019. Animation Techniques in Human-Robot Interaction User Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 8, 2, Article 12 (June 2019), 22 pages.
[21]
Trenton Schulz, Patrick Holthaus, Farshid Amirabdollahian, Kheng Lee Koay, Jim Tørresen, and Jo Herstad. 2019. Differences of Human Perceptions of a Robot Moving using Linear or Slow in, Slow out Velocity Profiles When Performing a Cleaning Task. In: 2019 28th International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). The 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2019), New Dehli, India: IEEE
[22]
Alfred Schutz. 1962. Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action. In: Natanson M. (eds) Collected Papers I. Phaenomenologica (Collection Publiée Sous le Patronage des Centres d'Archives-Husserl), vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht.
[23]
Frank M. Shipman III and Catherine C. Marshall. 1999. Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, Emerging Themes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations in Interactive Systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 8, Iss. 4, pp. 333--352.
[24]
Rebekka Soma, Vegard Dønnem Søyseth, Magnus Søyland, and Trenton Schulz. 2018. Facilitating Robots at Home: A Framework for Understanding Robot Facilitation. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI), Rome, Italy, March 25- March 29
[25]
Ja-Young Sung, Rebecca E. Grinter, Henrik I. Christensen, and Lan Guo. 2008. Housewives or technophiles? understanding domestic robot owners. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction (HRI '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 129--136.
[26]
JaYoung Sung, Rebecca E. Grinter, and Henrik I. Christensen. 2010. Domestic Robot Ecology. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 2, Iss. 4, 417--429.
[27]
Guri Verne. 2015. The winners are those who have used the old paper form. On citizens and automated public services. PhD Thesis, Department of Informatics, UiO. Retrieved from http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-50321
[28]
Guri Verne and Tone Bratteteig. 2016. Do-it-yourself services and work-like chores: on civic duties and digital public services. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 20, Iss. 4, 517--532.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enhancing Robot Inclusivity in the Built Environment: A Digital Twin-Assisted Assessment of Design Guideline ComplianceBuildings10.3390/buildings1405119314:5(1193)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2024
  • (2024)A Framework for Auditing Robot-Inclusivity of Indoor Environments Based on Lighting ConditionBuildings10.3390/buildings1404111014:4(1110)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating the Robot Inclusivity of Buildings Based on Surface UnevennessApplied Sciences10.3390/app1417783114:17(7831)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Adapting to a Robot: Adapting Gardening and the Garden to fit a Robot Lawn Mower

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HRI '20: Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
    March 2020
    702 pages
    ISBN:9781450370578
    DOI:10.1145/3371382
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 April 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. adaption
    2. autoethnography
    3. automation
    4. new tasks
    5. robot mower

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    HRI '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)185
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)54
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Enhancing Robot Inclusivity in the Built Environment: A Digital Twin-Assisted Assessment of Design Guideline ComplianceBuildings10.3390/buildings1405119314:5(1193)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2024
    • (2024)A Framework for Auditing Robot-Inclusivity of Indoor Environments Based on Lighting ConditionBuildings10.3390/buildings1404111014:4(1110)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Evaluating the Robot Inclusivity of Buildings Based on Surface UnevennessApplied Sciences10.3390/app1417783114:17(7831)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Digitalization of agriculture for sustainable crop production: a use-case reviewFrontiers in Environmental Science10.3389/fenvs.2024.137519312Online publication date: 25-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Troubleshooting the connected home: Exploring the perspectives of non-initiatorsConvergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies10.1177/13548565241268062Online publication date: 13-Aug-2024
    • (2024)A Taxonomy of Domestic Robot Failure Outcomes: Understanding the impact of failure on trustworthiness of domestic robotsProceedings of the Second International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems10.1145/3686038.3686050(1-14)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Designing Multispecies Worlds for Robots, Cats, and HumansProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642115(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Door-Density-Aware Path PlanningIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.346387612(136880-136888)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2022)Geological Information Capture with Sketches and OntologiesThe Semantic Web: ESWC 2022 Satellite Events10.1007/978-3-031-11609-4_41(275-284)Online publication date: 29-May-2022
    • (2021)Service Robots: A Systematic Literature ReviewElectronics10.3390/electronics1021265810:21(2658)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media