research-article

Increasing Pedestrian Safety Using External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles for Signalling Hazards

Authors:

Enrico RukzioAuthors Info & Claims

MobileHCI '21: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction

Article No.: 20, Pages 1 - 10

https://doi.org/10.1145/3447526.3472024

Published: 27 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Pedestrians are very vulnerable road users. Autonomous vehicles driving on the street are expected to reduce the risks for pedestrians. However, traffic will include manually driven vehicles for the next decades; therefore, the risk remains and can even increase due to pedestrians’ overreliance on technology. Thus, we propose to use autonomous vehicles parked at the side of the road to continually survey its surroundings and to issue warnings to pedestrians in potentially risky situations. Findings of a Virtual Reality (N=20) study show that participants preferred the communication on the vehicle compared to a communication on the sidewalk, that the visualization grabbed participants’ attention, and that overall crossing time was not significantly affected. This concept highlights the potential autonomous vehicles could have in making traffic safer, even while being parked.

References

[1]

Sander Ackermans, Debargha Dey, Peter Ruijten, Raymond H. Cuijpers, and Bastian Pfleging. 2020. The Effects of Explicit Intention Communication, Conspicuous Sensors, and Pedestrian Attitude in Interactions with Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (Chi ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376197

Digital Library

[2]

International Energy Agency. 2020. Global EV Outlook 2020. OECD Publishing, Paris, France. 276 pages. https://doi.org/10.1787/d394399e-en

[3]

AutoUI2020. 2020. International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. https://www.auto-ui.org/20/. [Online; accessed October 2020].

[4]

Bbc. 2017. Pavement lights guide ’smartphone zombies’. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-38992653. [Online; accessed 12-JUNE-2020].

[5]

Ashley Colley, Jonna Häkkilä, Meri-Tuulia Forsman, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2018. Car Exterior Surface Displays: Exploration in a Real-World Context. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Munich, Germany) (PerDis ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205880

Digital Library

[6]

Ashley Colley, Jonna Häkkilä, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2017. A Design Space for External Displays on Cars. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct(Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131760

Digital Library

[7]

Mark Colley, Stefanos Can Mytilineos, Marcel Walch, Jan Gugenheimer, and Enrico Rukzio. 2020. Evaluating Highly Automated Trucks as Signaling Lights. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(AutomotiveUI ’20). Acm, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410647

Digital Library

[8]

Mark Colley and Rukzio Rukzio. 2020. A Design Space for External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(AutomotiveUI ’20). Acm, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410646

Digital Library

[9]

Mark Colley, Marcel Walch, Jan Gugenheimer, Ali Askari, and Enrico Rukzio. 2020. Towards Inclusive External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles for Pedestrians with Vision Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (Chi ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376472

Digital Library

[10]

Mark Colley, Marcel Walch, Jan Gugenheimer, Ali Askari, and Enrico Rukzio. 2020. Towards Inclusive External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles for Pedestrians with Vision Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14.

Digital Library

[11]

Mark Colley, Marcel Walch, and Rukzio Rukzio. 2020. Unveiling the Lack of Scalability in Research on External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, Hawaii USA) (Chi ’20). Acm, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382865

Digital Library

[12]

NASA Ames Research Center Color Usage Research Lab. Year unknown. BLINKING, FLASHING, AND TEMPORAL RESPONSE. https://colorusage.arc.nasa.gov/flashing.php. [Online; accessed 28-MARCH-2021].

[13]

European Commission. 2018. Road Safety in the European Union – Trends, statistics and main challenges. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/vademecum_2018.pdf. https://doi.org/10.2832/060333 [Online; accessed: 12-FEBRUARY-2020].

[14]

Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). 2019. Verkehr Verkehrsunfälle 2018. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Verkehrsunfaelle/Publikationen/Downloads-Verkehrsunfaelle/verkehrsunfaelle-jahr-2080700187004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. [Online; accessed 12-SETEMBER-2020].

[15]

Debargha Dey, Azra Habibovic, Bastian Pfleging, Marieke Martens, and Jacques Terken. 2020. Color and Animation Preferences for a Light Band eHMI in Interactions between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13.

Digital Library

[16]

Debargha Dey, Kai Holländer, Melanie Berger, Berry Eggen, Marieke Martens, Bastian Pfleging, and Jacques Terken. 2020. Distance-Dependent EHMIs for the Interaction Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Virtual Event, DC, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410642

Digital Library

[17]

Debargha Dey, Kai Holländer, Melanie Berger, Berry Eggen, Marieke Martens, Bastian Pfleging, and Jacques Terken. 2020. Distance-Dependent EHMIs for the Interaction Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Virtual Event, DC, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410642

Digital Library

[18]

Stefanie M. Faas, Andrea C. Kao, and Martin Baumann. 2020. A Longitudinal Video Study on Communicating Status and Intent for Self-Driving Vehicle – Pedestrian Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (Chi ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376484

Digital Library

[19]

Daniel J Fagnant and Kara Kockelman. 2015. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 77 (2015), 167–181.

[20]

Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, and Albert-Georg Lang. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods 41, 4 (2009), 1149–1160.

[21]

Association for Safe International Road Traffic. 2020. Road Safety Facts. https://www.asirt.org/safe-travel/road-safety-facts/. [Online; accessed 12-SETEMBER-2020].

[22]

National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2009. Not-in-Traffic Surveillance 2007 - Children Traffic Safety Facts Crash Stats. Report No. DOT HS 811 116). https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/811116. [Online; accessed 12-SETEMBER-2020].

[23]

National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2018. Non-traffic surveillance: fatality and injury statistics in nontraffic crashes in 2015 (Traffic Safety Facts Crash Stats. Report No. DOT HS 812 515). https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812515. [Online; accessed 12-SETEMBER-2020].

[24]

National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2018. Pedestrians: 2016 data. (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 493).https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812493. [Online; accessed 12-SETEMBER-2020].

[25]

National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2019. 2018 fatal motor vehicle crashes: Overview. (Traffic Safety Facts Research Note. Report No. DOT HS 812 826). https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812826. [Online; accessed 12-SETEMBER-2020].

[26]

European Commission Directorate General for Transport. 2018. Traffic Safety Basic Facts on Pedestrians. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/statistics/dacota/bfs20xx_pedestrians.pdf. [Online; accessed: 05-JULY-2020].

[27]

Tanja Fuest, Lenja Sorokin, Hanna Bellem, and Klaus Bengler. 2018. Taxonomy of Traffic Situations for the Interaction between Automated Vehicles and Human Road Users. In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, Neville A Stanton (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 708–719.

[28]

David C. Funder and Daniel J. Ozer. 2019. Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2, 2(2019), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202

[29]

Google. 2020. Google Scholar Top Publications. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=de&vq=eng_humancomputerinteraction. [Online; accessed October 2020].

[30]

Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 139–183.

[31]

Kai Holländer, Ashley Colley, Christian Mai, Jonna Häkkilä, Florian Alt, and Bastian Pfleging. 2019. Investigating the Influence of External Car Displays on Pedestrians’ Crossing Behavior in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11.

Digital Library

[32]

Kai Holländer, Mark Colley, Enrico Rukzio, and Andreas Butz. 2021. A Taxonomy of Vulnerable Road Users for HCI Based On A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 158, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445480

Digital Library

[33]

Kai Holländer, Andy Krüger, and Andreas Butz. 2020. Save the Smombies: App-Assisted Street Crossing. In 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Oldenburg, Germany) (MobileHCI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379503.3403547

Digital Library

[34]

Kai Holländer, Philipp Wintersberger, and Andreas Butz. 2019. Overtrust in External Cues of Automated Vehicles: An Experimental Investigation. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344528

Digital Library

[35]

Ming Hou, Karthik Mahadevan, Sowmya Somanath, Ehud Sharlin, and Lora Oehlberg. 2020. Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interaction: Peril and Promise. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (Chi ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376884

Digital Library

[36]

Ahmed Hussein, Fernando Garcia, Jose Maria Armingol, and Cristina Olaverri-Monreal. 2016. P2V and V2P communication for pedestrian warning on the basis of autonomous vehicles. In 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). Ieee, Ieee, New York, NY, USA, 2034–2039.

Digital Library

[37]

T. Hwang, J. P. Jeong, and E. Lee. 2014. SANA: Safety-Aware Navigation App for pedestrian protection in vehicular networks. In 2014 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 947–953.

[38]

Shubham Jain, Carlo Borgiattino, Yanzhi Ren, Marco Gruteser, and Yingying Chen. 2014. On the Limits of Positioning-Based Pedestrian Risk Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Mobile Augmented Reality and Robotic Technology-Based Systems (Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, USA) (Mars ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2609829.2609834

Digital Library

[39]

Jaymantri. 2015. Picture of a street. https://images.pexels.com/photos/2647/cars-vehicles-street-parking.jpg. [Online; accessed: 05-FEBRUARY-2021].

[40]

Satish Jeyachandran. 2020. Introducing the 5th-generation Waymo Driver: Informed by experience, designed for scale, engineered to tackle more environments. https://blog.waymo.com/2020/03/introducing-5th-generation-waymo-driver.html. [Online; accessed 12-SETEMBER-2020].

[41]

Jiun-Yin Jian, Ann M Bisantz, and Colin G Drury. 2000. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4, 1 (2000), 53–71.

[42]

Young Woo Kim, Jae Hyun Han, Yong Gu Ji, and Seul Chan Lee. 2020. Exploring the Effectiveness of External Human-Machine Interfaces on Pedestrians and Drivers. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 65–68.

[43]

Moritz Körber. 2019. Theoretical Considerations and Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Trust in Automation. In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), Sebastiano Bagnara, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino, Thomas Alexander, and Yushi Fujita(Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 13–30.

[44]

Fred Lambert. 2016. Elon Musk explains Tesla Autopilot’s new capacity to see ahead of the car in front of you. https://electrek.co/2016/09/11/elon-musk-autopilot-update-can-now-sees-ahead-of-the-car-in-front-of-you/. [Online; accessed 08-OCTOBER-2020].

[45]

Mirjam Lanzer, Franziska Babel, Fei Yan, Bihan Zhang, Fang You, Jianmin Wang, and Martin Baumann. 2020. Designing Communication Strategies of Autonomous Vehicles with Pedestrians: An Intercultural Study. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 122–131.

[46]

Yee Mun Lee, Ruth Madigan, Jorge Garcia, Andrew Tomlinson, Albert Solernou, Richard Romano, Gustav Markkula, Natasha Merat, and Jim Uttley. 2019. Understanding the Messages Conveyed by Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 134–143.

Digital Library

[47]

CGactive LLC. 2012. Type N Walk. http://www.type-n-walk.com/. [Online; accessed 12-JUNE-2020].

[48]

Andreas Löcken, Carmen Golling, and Andreas Riener. 2019. How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians? A Comparative Analysis of Interaction Concepts in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344544

Digital Library

[49]

Andreas Löcken, Carmen Golling, and Andreas Riener. 2019. How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians? A Comparative Analysis of Interaction Concepts in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, Utrecht, Netherlands, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344544

Digital Library

[50]

Haiko Lüpsen. 2020. R-Funktionen zur Varianzanalyse. http://www.uni-koeln.de/~luepsen/R/. [Online; accessed 25-SEPTEMBER-2020].

[51]

Karthik Mahadevan, Sowmya Somanath, and Ehud Sharlin. 2018. Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (Chi ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174003

Digital Library

[52]

Steffen Maurer, Rainer Erbach, Issam Kraiem, Susanne Kuhnert, Petra Grimm, and Enrico Rukzio. 2018. Designing a Guardian Angel: Giving an Automated Vehicle the Possibility to Override Its Driver. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239078

Digital Library

[53]

Adam Millard-Ball. 2018. Pedestrians, autonomous vehicles, and cities. Journal of planning education and research 38, 1 (2018), 6–12.

[54]

MobileHCI2020. 2020. Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. https://mobilehci.acm.org/2020/. [Online; accessed October 2020].

[55]

Dylan Moore, Rebecca Currano, and David Sirkin. 2020. Sound Decisions: How Synthetic Motor Sounds Improve Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interactions. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 94–103.

Digital Library

[56]

Dylan Moore, Rebecca Currano, G. Ella Strack, and David Sirkin. 2019. The Case for Implicit External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3345320

Digital Library

[57]

Trung Thanh Nguyen, Kai Holländer, Marius Hoggenmueller, Callum Parker, and Martin Tomitsch. 2019. Designing for Projection-Based Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344543

Digital Library

[58]

Pixabay. 2020. Simplified Pixabay License. https://pixabay.com/service/license/. [Online; accessed 10-FEBRUARY-2020].

[59]

Michael Rettenmaier, Moritz Pietsch, Jonas Schmidtler, and Klaus Bengler. 2019. Passing through the Bottleneck-The Potential of External Human-Machine Interfaces. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). Ieee, Ieee, New York, NY, USA, 1687–1692.

Digital Library

[60]

Richard Retting. 2019. Pedestrian Traffic Fatalities by State: 2018 Preliminary data. https://www.ghsa.org/sites/default/files/2019-02/FINAL_Pedestrians19.pdf.

[61]

Robert Rosenthal, Harris Cooper, and L Hedges. 1994. Parametric measures of effect size. The handbook of research synthesis 621, 2 (1994), 231–244.

[62]

Shadan Sadeghian, Marc Hassenzahl, and Kai Eckoldt. 2020. An Exploration of Prosocial Aspects of Communication Cues between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Virtual Event, DC, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410657

Digital Library

[63]

Andreas Sieß, Kathleen Hübel, Daniel Hepperle, Andreas Dronov, Christian Hufnagel, Julia Aktun, and Matthias Wölfel. 2015. Hybrid City Lighting-Improving Pedestrians’ Safety through Proactive Street Lighting. In 2015 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW). Ieee, New York, NY, USA, 46–49.

Digital Library

[64]

Laerd statistics. 2016. Mixed ANOVA using SPSS Statistics. https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/mixed-anova-using-spss-statistics.php. [Online; Accessed: 12-SEPTEMBER-2019].

[65]

Richard M Taylor. 2017. Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In Situational awareness. Routledge, Abingdon, UK, 111–128.

[66]

Unity Technologies. 2019. Unity. Unity Technologies. https://unity.com/

[67]

Photographer unknown. 2013. Picture of a parking deck. https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2013/11/28/09/57/parking-219767_960_720.jpg. [Online; accessed: 05-FEBRUARY-2021].

[68]

Tamara von Sawitzky, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Löcken, Anna-Katharina Frison, and Andreas Riener. 2020. Augmentation Concepts with HUDs for Cyclists to Improve Road Safety in Shared Spaces. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9.

Digital Library

[69]

Tianyu Wang, Giuseppe Cardone, Antonio Corradi, Lorenzo Torresani, and Andrew T. Campbell. 2012. WalkSafe: A Pedestrian Safety App for Mobile Phone Users Who Walk and Talk While Crossing Roads. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems & Applications (San Diego, California) (HotMobile ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2162081.2162089

Digital Library

[70]

Vizible Zone. 2020. Viziblezone - Protecting Vulnerable Road Users. https://www.vizible.zone/. [Online; accessed 12-JUNE-2020].

Cited By

Jun SChung HKim SLee Y(2024)Child Pedestrians’ Perception of External Car Display: Effects of Communication Style and Visualization Type on Trust and Perceived SafetyArchives of Design Research10.15187/adr.2024.02.37.1.737:1(7-25)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2024.02.37.1.7
Stampf ASasalovici MMeinhardt LColley MGiss MRukzio E(2024)Move, Connect, Interact: Introducing a Design Space for Cross-Traffic InteractionProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785808:3(1-40)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678580
Dey DSenan THengeveld BColley MHabibovic AJu W(2024)Multi-Modal eHMIs: The Relative Impact of Light and Sound in AV-Pedestrian InteractionProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642031(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642031
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

A Design Space for External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles
AutomotiveUI '20: 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

Autonomous vehicles are on the verge of entering the mass market. Communication between these vehicles with vulnerable road users could increase safety and ease their introduction by helping to understand the vehicle’s intention. Numerous communication ...
Unveiling the Lack of Scalability in Research on External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles
CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

The traffic system is a complex network with numerous individuals (e.g., drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians) and vehicles involved. Road systems vary in various aspects such as the number of lanes, right of way, and configuration. With the emergence of ...
A new standard for accident simulations for self-driving vehicles: Can we use Waymo’s results from accident simulations?
Abstract
Recent simulations by Scanlon et al. showed seemingly spectacular results for the Waymo self-driving vehicle in simulations of real accident situations. In this paper, it is argued that the selection criteria for accident situations must be ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

MobileHCI '21: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction

September 2021

637 pages

ISBN:9781450383288

DOI:10.1145/3447526

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 September 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

MobileHCI '21

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

MobileHCI '21: 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction

September 27 - October 1, 2021

Toulouse & Virtual, France

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
473
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)84
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Jun SChung HKim SLee Y(2024)Child Pedestrians’ Perception of External Car Display: Effects of Communication Style and Visualization Type on Trust and Perceived SafetyArchives of Design Research10.15187/adr.2024.02.37.1.737:1(7-25)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2024.02.37.1.7
Stampf ASasalovici MMeinhardt LColley MGiss MRukzio E(2024)Move, Connect, Interact: Introducing a Design Space for Cross-Traffic InteractionProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785808:3(1-40)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678580
Dey DSenan THengeveld BColley MHabibovic AJu W(2024)Multi-Modal eHMIs: The Relative Impact of Light and Sound in AV-Pedestrian InteractionProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642031(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642031
Wang YWijenayake SHoggenmüller MHespanhol LWorrall STomitsch M(2023)My Eyes Speak: Improving Perceived Sociability of Autonomous Vehicles in Shared Spaces Through Emotional Robotic EyesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042617:MHCI(1-30)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3604261
Colley MBritten JRukzio E(2023)Scalability in External Communication of Automated VehiclesProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35962487:2(1-26)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3596248
Colley MLi SSamson BSogemeier D(2023)What if Automated Vehicles Became AUTONOMOUS? A Critical PerspectiveAdjunct Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3581961.3609854(352-355)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3581961.3609854
Winkelmann SBüttner MDeivasihamani Dvon Hoffmann AFlohr F(2023)Using Node-RED as a Low-Code Approach to Model Interaction Logic of Machine-Learning-Supported eHMIs for the Virtual Driving Simulator CarlaAdjunct Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3581961.3609844(323-326)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3581961.3609844
Wu RChen H(2023)The Effect of Visual and Auditory Modality Mismatching between Distraction and Warning on Pedestrian Street Crossing Behavior2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00121(1045-1054)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00121
Colley MFabian TRukzio E(2022)Investigating the Effects of External Communication and Automation Behavior on Manual Drivers at IntersectionsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35467116:MHCI(1-16)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3546711
Jansen PColley MRukzio E(2022)A Design Space for Human Sensor and Actuator Focused In-Vehicle Interaction Based on a Systematic Literature ReviewProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35346176:2(1-51)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3534617
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents