Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3366423.3380118acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Facebook Ads as a Demographic Tool to Measure the Urban-Rural Divide

Published: 20 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In the global move toward urbanization, making sure the people remaining in rural areas are not left behind in terms of development and policy considerations is a priority for governments worldwide. However, it is increasingly challenging to track important statistics concerning this sparse, geographically dispersed population, resulting in a lack of reliable, up-to-date data. In this study, we examine the usefulness of the Facebook Advertising platform, which offers a digital “census” of over two billions of its users, in measuring potential rural-urban inequalities. We focus on Italy, a country where about 30% of the population lives in rural areas. First, we show that the population statistics that Facebook produces suffer from instability across time and incomplete coverage of sparsely populated municipalities. To overcome such limitation, we propose an alternative methodology for estimating Facebook Ads audiences that nearly triples the coverage of the rural municipalities from 19% to 55% and makes feasible fine-grained sub-population analysis. Using official national census data, we evaluate our approach and confirm known significant urban-rural divides in terms of educational attainment and income. Extending the analysis to Facebook-specific user “interests” and behaviors, we provide further insights on the divide, for instance, finding that rural areas show a higher interest in gambling. Notably, we find that the most predictive features of income in rural areas differ from those for urban centres, suggesting researchers need to consider a broader range of attributes when examining rural wellbeing. The findings of this study illustrate the necessity of improving existing tools and methodologies to include under-represented populations in digital demographic studies – the failure to do so could result in misleading observations, conclusions, and most importantly, policies.

References

[1]
Natalia Adler, Ciro Cattuto, Kyriaki Kalimeri, Daniela Paolotti, Michele Tizzoni, Stefaan Verhulst, Elad Yom-Tov, and Andrew Young. 2019. How search engine data enhance the understanding of determinants of suicide in India and inform prevention: observational study. Journal of medical internet research 21, 1 (2019), e10179.
[2]
Diego Alburez-Gutierrez, Emilio Zagheni, Samin Aref, SoÞa Gil-Clavel, Andre Grow, and Daniela V Negraia. 2019. Demography in the Digital Era: New Data Sources for Population Research. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/24jp7
[3]
Matheus Araujo, Yelena Mejova, Ingmar Weber, and Fabricio Benevenuto. 2017. Using Facebook ads audiences for global lifestyle disease surveillance: Promises and limitations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference. ACM, 253–257.
[4]
Anna Baranowska-Rataj, Kieron Barclay, and Martin Kolk. 2017. The effect of number of siblings on adult mortality: Evidence from Swedish registers for cohorts born between 1938 and 1972. Population Studies 71, 1 (2017), 43–63.
[5]
Kieron J Barclay and Martin Kolk. 2017. The long-term cognitive and socioeconomic consequences of birth intervals: A within-family sibling comparison using Swedish register data. Demography 54, 2 (2017), 459–484.
[6]
Mariano G Beiró, André Panisson, Michele Tizzoni, and Ciro Cattuto. 2016. Predicting human mobility through the assimilation of social media traces into mobility models. EPJ Data Science 5, 1 (2016), 30.
[7]
Luís MA Bettencourt. 2013. The origins of scaling in cities. science 340, 6139 (2013), 1438–1441.
[8]
Luís MA Bettencourt, José Lobo, Dirk Helbing, Christian Kühnert, and Geoffrey B West. 2007. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 104, 17(2007), 7301–7306.
[9]
Honor Bixby, James Bentham, Bin Zhou, Mariachiara Di Cesare, Christopher J Paciorek, NCD Risk Factor Collaboration, 2019. Rising rural body-mass index is the main driver of the global obesity epidemic. Nature569(2019), 260–264.
[10]
Andrea Bonanomi, Alessandro Rosina, Ciro Cattuto, and Kyriaki Kalimeri. 2017. Understanding Youth Unemployment in Italy via Social Media Data. In 28th IUSSP international population conference.
[11]
José González Cabañas, Ángel Cuevas, and Rubén Cuevas. 2018. Facebook use of sensitive data for advertising in Europe. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05030(2018).
[12]
Lisa Carter-Harris, Rebecca Bartlett Ellis, Adam Warrick, and Susan Rawl. 2016. Beyond traditional newspaper advertisement: leveraging Facebook-targeted advertisement to recruit long-term smokers for research. Journal of medical Internet research 18, 6 (2016), e117.
[13]
Nina Cesare, Hedwig Lee, Tyler McCormick, Emma Spiro, and Emilio Zagheni. 2018. Promises and pitfalls of using digital traces for demographic research. Demography 55, 5 (2018), 1979–1999.
[14]
Benjamin Sage Crosier, Rachel Marie Brian, and Dror Ben-Zeev. 2016. Using Facebook to reach people who experience auditory hallucinations. Journal of medical Internet research 18, 6 (2016), e160.
[15]
Yves-Alexandre De Montjoye, Laura Radaelli, Vivek Kumar Singh, 2015. Unique in the shopping mall: On the reidentifiability of credit card metadata. Science 347, 6221 (2015), 536–539.
[16]
Jules Depersin and Marc Barthelemy. 2018. From global scaling to the dynamics of individual cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 10(2018), 2317–2322.
[17]
Paul DiMaggio, Eszter Hargittai, 2001. From the ‘digital divide’to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton: Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University 4, 1 (2001), 4–2.
[18]
Antoine Dubois, Emilio Zagheni, Kiran Garimella, and Ingmar Weber. 2018. Studying migrant assimilation through facebook interests. In International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer, 51–60.
[19]
Masoomali Fatehkia, Ridhi Kashyap, and Ingmar Weber. 2018. Using Facebook ad data to track the global digital gender gap. World Development 107(2018), 189–209.
[20]
Masoomali Fatehkia, Dan O’Brien, and Ingmar Weber. 2019. Correlated impulses: Using Facebook interests to improve predictions of crime rates in urban areas. PLOS ONE 14, 2 (2019), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211350
[21]
David Garcia, Yonas Mitike Kassa, Angel Cuevas, Manuel Cebrian, Esteban Moro, Iyad Rahwan, and Ruben Cuevas. 2018. Analyzing gender inequality through large-scale Facebook advertising data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 27(2018), 6958–6963.
[22]
Sofia Gil-Clavel and Emilio Zagheni. 2019. Demographic Differentials in Facebook Usage Around the World. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 13(01). AAAI, 647–650.
[23]
Kyriaki Kalimeri, Mariano G Beiró, Matteo Delfino, Robert Raleigh, and Ciro Cattuto. 2019. Predicting demographics, moral foundations, and human values from digital behaviours. Computers in Human Behavior 92 (2019), 428–445.
[24]
Kyriaki Kalimeri, Mariano G Beiró, Alessandra Urbinati, Andrea Bonanomi, Alessandro Rosina, and Ciro Cattuto. 2019. Human Values and Attitudes towards Vaccination in Social Media. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 248–254.
[25]
Joshua D Kent and Henry T Capello Jr. 2013. Spatial patterns and demographic indicators of effective social media content during theHorsethief Canyon fire of 2012. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 40, 2 (2013), 78–89.
[26]
Marc Keuschnigg, Selcan Mutgan, and Peter Hedström. 2019. Urban scaling and the regional divide. Science advances 5, 1 (2019), eaav0042.
[27]
Steph Larsen. 2011. Welcome to the food deserts of rural America. https://grist.org/article/2011-01-21-welcome-to-the-food-deserts-of-rural-america/.
[28]
Arch G Mainous and Francis P Kohrs. 1995. A comparison of health status between rural and urban adults. Journal of Community Health 20, 5 (1995), 423–431.
[29]
Yelena Mejova, Harsh Rajiv Gandhi, Tejas Jivanbhai Rafaliya, Mayank Rameshbhai Sitapara, Ridhi Kashyap, and Ingmar Weber. 2018. Measuring Subnational Digital Gender Inequality in India through Gender Gaps in Facebook Use. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies. ACM, 43.
[30]
Yelena Mejova and Kyriaki Kalimeri. 2019. Effect of Values and Technology Use on Exercise: Implications for Personalized Behavior Change Interventions. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, 36–45.
[31]
Yelena Mejova, Ingmar Weber, and Luis Fernandez-Luque. 2018. Online health monitoring using Facebook advertisement audience estimates in the United States: Evaluation study. JMIR public health and surveillance 4, 1 (2018), e30.
[32]
S Murdock and DA Swanson. 2008. Applied demography in the twenty-first century.
[33]
Steve H. Murdock, Michael Cline, and Mary Zey. 2012. Challenges in the Analysis of Rural Populations in the United States. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_2
[34]
Somen Nandi, Saigopal Thota, Avishek Nag, Sw Divyasukhananda, Partha Goswami, Ashwin Aravindakshan, Raymond Rodriguez, and Biswanath Mukherjee. 2016. Computing for rural empowerment: enabled by last-mile telecommunications. IEEE Communications Magazine 54, 6 (2016), 102–109.
[35]
OECD. 2018. OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance 2018. 168 pages. https://doi.org/10.1787/reg_cit_glance-2018-en
[36]
OECD. 2018. Rural 3.0 A framework for rural develppment. Technical Report. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/Rural-3.0-Policy-Note.pdf
[37]
Alexandra Olteanu, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Emre Kiciman. 2019. Social data: Biases, methodological pitfalls, and ethical boundaries. Frontiers in Big Data 2(2019), 13.
[38]
Steffen Pötzschke and Michael Braun. 2017. Migrant sampling using facebook advertisements: A case study of polish migrants in four European countries. Social Science Computer Review 35, 5 (2017), 633–653.
[39]
Francesco Rampazzo, Emilio Zagheni, Ingmar Weber, Maria Rita Testa, and Francesco Billari. 2018. Mater certa est, pater numquam: What can Facebook Advertising Data Tell Us about Male Fertility Rates?. In Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
[40]
Jonathan Rigg, Anthony Bebbington, Katherine V Gough, Deborah F Bryceson, Jytte Agergaard, Niels Fold, and Cecilia Tacoli. 2009. The World Development Report 2009’reshapes economic geography’: geographical reflections. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34, 2(2009), 128–136.
[41]
Kevin M Roessger, Arie Greenleaf, and Chad Hoggan. 2017. Using data collection apps and single-case designs to research transformative learning in adults. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education 23, 2 (2017), 206–225.
[42]
Derek Ruths and Jürgen Pfeffer. 2014. Social media for large studies of behavior. Science 346, 6213 (2014), 1063–1064.
[43]
David E Sahn and David C Stifel. 2003. Urban–rural inequality in living standards in Africa. Journal of African Economies 12, 4 (2003), 564–597.
[44]
Nandita Saikia, Abhishek Singh, Domantas Jasilionis, and Prof Faujdar Ram. 2013. Explaining the rural-urban gap in infant mortality in India. Demographic Research 29(2013), 473–506.
[45]
Matthew J Salganik. 2019. Bit by bit: social research in the digital age. Princeton University Press.
[46]
Indira Sen, Fabian Floeck, Katrin Weller, Bernd Weiss, and Claudia Wagner. 2019. A Total Error Framework for Digital Traces of Humans. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.08228(2019).
[47]
Terry Sicular, Yue Ximing, Björn Gustafsson, and Li Shi. 2007. The urban–rural income gap and inequality in China. Review of Income and Wealth 53, 1 (2007), 93–126.
[48]
Elizaveta Sivak and Ivan Smirnov. 2019. Parents mention sons more often than daughters on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 6 (2019), 2039–2041. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804996116 arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/content/116/6/2039.full.pdf
[49]
S Spyratos, M Vespe, F Natale, I Weber, E Zagheni, and M Rango. 2018. Migration Data using Social Media. JRC Science Hub (2018).
[50]
G Thorvaldsen. [n.d.]. Handbook of international historical microdata for population research.
[51]
Zeynep Tufekci. 2014. Big questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
[52]
Jelte M Wicherts, Coosje LS Veldkamp, Hilde EM Augusteijn, Marjan Bakker, Robbie Van Aert, and Marcel ALM Van Assen. 2016. Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in psychology 7 (2016), 1832.
[53]
Dilek Yildiz, Joanna Munson, Agnese Vitali, Ramine Tinati, Jennifer Holland, 2017. Using Twitter data for demographic research. Demographic Research 37(2017), 1477–1514.
[54]
Alwyn Young. 2013. Inequality, the urban-rural gap, and migration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 128, 4 (2013), 1727–1785.
[55]
Emilio Zagheni, Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella, Ingmar Weber, 2014. Inferring international and internal migration patterns from twitter data. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 439–444.
[56]
Emilio Zagheni and Ingmar Weber. 2015. Demographic research with non-representative internet data. International Journal of Manpower 36, 1 (2015), 13–25.
[57]
Emilio Zagheni, Ingmar Weber, Krishna Gummadi, 2017. Leveraging Facebook’s advertising platform to monitor stocks of migrants. Population and Development Review 43, 4 (2017), 721–734.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)THE OPPORTUNITIES, LIMITATIONS, AND CHALLENGES IN USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES FOR HUMANITARIAN WORK AND DEVELOPMENTAdvances in Complex Systems10.1142/S021952592440002227:03Online publication date: 3-May-2024
  • (2023)Strengths and limitations of relative wealth indices derived from big data in IndonesiaFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2023.10541566Online publication date: 21-Feb-2023
  • (2022)Mapping urban socioeconomic inequalities in developing countries through Facebook advertising dataFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2022.10063525Online publication date: 21-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Facebook Ads as a Demographic Tool to Measure the Urban-Rural Divide
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WWW '20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020
        April 2020
        3143 pages
        ISBN:9781450370233
        DOI:10.1145/3366423
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 20 April 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. digital demography
        2. online advertising
        3. social networks
        4. urban-rural divide

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        WWW '20
        Sponsor:
        WWW '20: The Web Conference 2020
        April 20 - 24, 2020
        Taipei, Taiwan

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)79
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
        Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)THE OPPORTUNITIES, LIMITATIONS, AND CHALLENGES IN USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES FOR HUMANITARIAN WORK AND DEVELOPMENTAdvances in Complex Systems10.1142/S021952592440002227:03Online publication date: 3-May-2024
        • (2023)Strengths and limitations of relative wealth indices derived from big data in IndonesiaFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2023.10541566Online publication date: 21-Feb-2023
        • (2022)Mapping urban socioeconomic inequalities in developing countries through Facebook advertising dataFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2022.10063525Online publication date: 21-Nov-2022
        • (2022)Analysis of Demographic Characteristics Based on E-Demography DataDemography and social economy10.15407/dse2022.01.0381(38-54)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2022
        • (2022)Is Facebook’s Advertising Data Accurate Enough for Use in Social Science Research? Insights from a Cross-National Online SurveyJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society10.1111/rssa.12948185:Supplement_2(S343-S363)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2022
        • (2022)Fairness in vulnerable attribute prediction on social mediaData Mining and Knowledge Discovery10.1007/s10618-022-00855-y36:6(2194-2213)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2022
        • (2021)The Gender Gap in Preferences: Evidence from 45,397 Facebook InterestsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.3958638Online publication date: 2021
        • (2021)Using Facebook Ads Data to Assess Gender Balance in STEM: Evidence from BrazilCompanion Proceedings of the Web Conference 202110.1145/3442442.3453456(145-153)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2021
        • (2021)Comparative analysis of demographic potential of rural territories of the central black earthE3S Web of Conferences10.1051/e3sconf/202131108009311(08009)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2021
        • (2021)Spatiotemporal prediction of COVID-19 cases using inter- and intra-county proxies of human interactionsNature Communications10.1038/s41467-021-26742-612:1Online publication date: 8-Nov-2021
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media