Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3058555.3058559acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Active learning for Web accessibility evaluation

Published: 02 April 2017 Publication History

Abstract

To evaluate the accessibility level of a website, we need to obtain the accessibility evaluation results of the pages in this website. Due to the massive number of pages in a website and possible involvement of human inspection for conformance checking, directly evaluating all the pages is prohibitively expensive. In practice, we usually select a representative sample for accessibility evaluation of the whole site. This makes the evaluation results heavily dependent on the pages selected. Undersampling may lead to a large bias in evaluation. But oversampling will incur high evaluation expense. To address this issue, this paper proposes a semi-supervised machine learning method, called active-prediction, to obtain the accessibility evaluation results for all pages in a site. Active-prediction casts the website accessibility evaluation into a prediction problem by building learning models for each checkpoint in evaluation and consequently avoids the expensive cost in human inspection. To achieve a higher prediction accuracy with only a small number of training data, active-prediction exploits active learning techniques to select the most informative pages to train the models. Experimental results show that the active-prediction could achieve a high accuracy on predicting the accessibility results and better reflect the accessibility level of the websites than the existing methods.

References

[1]
Abou-Zahra, S., 2008. Web accessibility evaluation. Web Accessibility. Springer, p. 17--18.
[2]
Aurenhammer F. 1991. A survey of a fundamental geometric data structure {J}, 23(3).
[3]
Brajnik, G. A comparative test of Web accessibility evaluation methods. In Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, pages 113--120. ACM, 2008.
[4]
Brajnik, G., Lomuscio, R., 2007. SAMBA: a semi-automatic method for measuring barriers of accessibility. Proc. 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, p. 43--50.
[5]
Brajnik, G., Mulas, A., Pitton, C., 2007. Effects of sampling methods on Web accessibility evaluations. Proc. 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Comput-ers and Accessibility, p. 59--66.
[6]
Barghout, L. 2015. Spatial-Taxon Information Granules as Used in Iterative Fuzzy-Decision-Making for Image Segmentation {J}. 10:285--318.
[7]
Cai D, He X., 2011. Manifold Adaptive Experimental Design for Text Categorization {J}. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering, 24(4):707--719.
[8]
Caldwell, B., Cooper, M., Guarino Reid, L., Vanderheiden, G., 2008. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. W3C Accessibility Initiative. <http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/> (accessed November 2016).
[9]
Cohn, D.A., Ghahramani, Z., and Jordan, M.I. 1996. Active Learning with Statistical Models, J. Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 4, pp. 129--145.
[10]
Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., Jacobs, I., Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Accessibility Initiative. <http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/> (accessed November 2016).
[11]
Davis, J.J. 2002. Disenfranchising the disabled: the inaccessibility of Internet-based health information, Journal of Health Communication, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 355--67.
[12]
Flowers, C.P., Bray, M. and Algozzine, R.F. 1999. Accessibility of special education program home pages, Journal of Special Education Technology, Vol. 14, pp. 21--6.
[13]
Fernandes, N., Lopes, R. and Carriço, L. On Web accessibility evaluation environments. In W4A '11: Proceedings of the 2011 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A).
[14]
Harper, S., Moon, A. A., Vigo, M., Brajnik, G., & Yesilada, Y. 2015. DOM block clustering for enhanced sampling and evaluation. The, Web for All Conference (pp. 1--10).
[15]
Hackett, S., Parmanto, B. 2009. Homepage not enough when evaluating Web website accessibility, Internet Research, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 78--87.
[16]
Hanson, V.L., Richards, J.T., 2013. Progress on website accessibility. ACM Transactions on the Web, 7(1).
[17]
Henzinger, M.R., Heydon, A., Mitzenmacher, M., et al., 2000. On near-uniform URL sampling. Computer Networks, 33(1):295--308.
[18]
Joachims, T. 1998. Text categorization with support vector machines. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning, Springer-Verlrtg.
[19]
Klein, D., Myhill, W., Hansen, L., Asby, G., Michaelson, S. and Blanck, P. 2003. Electronic doors to education: study of high school website accessibility in Iowa, Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 27--49.
[20]
King, M., Thatcher, J., Bronstad, P., and Easton, R. 2005. Managing usability for people with disabilities in a large Web presence. IBM Systems Journal, 44(3):519--535.
[21]
Lazar, J. and Greenidge, K.-D. 2006. One year older, but not necessarily wiser: an evaluation of homepage accessibility problems over time, Universal Access in the Information Society, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 285--91.
[22]
Lazar, J., Beere, P., Greenidge, K. and Nagappa, Y. 2003. Web accessibility in the Mid-Atlantic United States: a study of 50 home pages, Universal Access in the Information Society Journal, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 331--41.
[23]
Lewis, D., and Gale, W. 1994. A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 3--12. ACM/Springer, 1994.
[24]
Loiacono, E.T. and McCoy, S. 2006, website accessibility: a cross-sector comparison, Universal Access in the Information Society, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 393--9.
[25]
Lindenbaum, M., Markovitch, S., and Rusakov, D. 2004. Selective Sampling for Nearest Neighbor Classifiers, Machine Learning, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 125--152.
[26]
Melville, P., Mooney, R.J. 2004. Diverse Ensembles for Active Learning, Proc. 21st Int'l Conf. Machine learning.
[27]
Marincu, C., McMullin, B., 2004. A comparative assessment of Web accessibility and technical standards conformance in four EU states.
[28]
Web Accessibility Benchmarking Cluster: D-WAB4 unified Web evaluation methodology (UWEM 1.0), 2006. http://www.wabcluster.org/uwem1/.
[29]
N. Ulltveit-Moe, M. Snaprud, A. Nietzio, M. G. Olsen, and C. Thomsen. Early Results from Automatic Accessibility Benchmarking of Public European Web websites from the EIAO
[30]
Nielsen, J. 2000. Designing Web Usability, New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
[31]
Papageorgiou, C., Oren, M., and Poggio, T. 1998. A general framework for object detection. In Proceedings of the International Conforence on Computer Vision.
[32]
Park, C. S., Choi, J. H., Nah, S. P., & Jang, W. 2008. Automatic modulation recognition of digital signals using wavelet features and SVM., 1, 387--390.
[33]
Roy N., McCallum, A. 2001.Toward Optimal Active Learning through Sampling Estimation of Error Reduction, Proc. 18th Int'l Conf. Machine Learning, pp. 441--448.
[34]
Settles, B. 2010. Active learning literature survey. University of Wisconsin-madison, 39(2), 127--131.
[35]
Seung, H.S., Opper, M., and Sompolinsky H. 1992. Query by Committee, Proc. Fifth Ann. Workshop Computational Learning Theory, pp. 287--294.
[36]
Scheffer, T., Decomain, C., and Wrobel, S. 2001. Active hidden Markov models for information extraction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis (CAIDA), pages 309--318. Springer-Verlag.
[37]
Sindhwani, V., Niyogi, P., and Belkin, M. 2005. Beyond the point cloud:from transductive to semi-supervised learning. In Proc. 2005 Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML'05).
[38]
Sullivan, T. and Matson, R. 2000. Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the Web's most popular websites. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Universal Usability, pp. 139--144
[39]
Seung, H.S., Opper, M., and Sompolinsky, H. 1992. Query by committee. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 287--294.
[40]
Settles B, Craven M, Ray S. 2007. Multiple-Instance Active Learning {C} Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, December: 1289--1296.
[41]
Settles B, Craven M. 2008. An analysis of active learning strategies for sequence labeling tasks{C} Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics: 1070--1079.
[42]
Sullivan, T., Matson, R., 2000. Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the Web's most popular websites. Proc. ACM Conference on Universal Usability, p. 139--144.
[43]
Tong, S. and Chang, E. 2001. Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 107--118.
[44]
Velleman, E., Velasco, C., Snaprud, M., et al., 2006. D-wab4 Unified Web Evaluation Methodology (UWEM 1.0). Technical Report, WAB Cluster.
[45]
Vigo, M., Arrue, M., Brajnik, G., Lomuscio, R. and Abascal, J. Quantitative metrics for measuring Web accessibility. In W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A) (Banff, Canada). ACM Press, 99--107
[46]
Vigo, M. and Harper, S. Evaluating Accessibility-in-Use. In W4A '13: Proceedings of the 2013 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A).
[47]
Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0, W3C Working Group Note 10 July 2014, http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-EM/
[48]
Yu, K., Bi, J., and Tresp, V. 2006. Active learning via transductive experimental design. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, Pittsburgh, PA.
[49]
Yu, H. 2002. Web accessibility and the law: recommendations for implementation, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 408--19.
[50]
Zhang, L., Chen, C., Bu, J., & Cai, D. 2011. Active learning based on locally linear reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 33(10), 2026--2038.
[51]
Zhang, M., Wang, C., Bu, J., Yu, Z., Lu, Y., Zhang, R., Chen, C. 2015. A sampling method based on URL clustering for fast Web accessibility evaluation, Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, Vol. 16 No.6, pp. 449--456.
[52]
Zhang, M., Wang, C., Bu, J., Yu, Z., Lu, Y., Zhang, R., Chen, C. 2015. An optimal sampling method for Web accessibility quantitative metric, Proceedings of the 12th Web for All Conference, Florence, Italy, 2015, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1--4.
[53]
Zeng, X. Evaluation of Enhancement of Web Content Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, 2004.
[54]
Zhu, X. 2005. Semi-Supervised Learning with Graphs. PhD thesis, Carnegie MellonUniversity.
[55]
Zhu, X., Lafferty, J., Ghahramani, Z. 2003. Combining Active Learning and Semi-Supervised Learning Using Gaussian Fields and Harmonic Functions, Proc. Int'l Conf. Machine Learning Workshop Continuum from Labeled to Unlabeled Data in Machine Learning and Data Mining, pp. 58--65.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Dynamic detection of accessibility smellsUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-023-01043-5Online publication date: 22-Sep-2023
  • (2022)An Initial Exploration of Tweets Associated With Web AccessibilityInternational Journal of Art, Culture, Design, and Technology10.4018/IJACDT.31284811:1(1-22)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Distilling Holistic Knowledge with Graph Neural Networks2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01022(10367-10376)Online publication date: Oct-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
W4A '17: Proceedings of the 14th International Web for All Conference
April 2017
191 pages
ISBN:9781450349000
DOI:10.1145/3058555
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 April 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Active learning
  2. Quality Assessment
  3. Web accessibility evaluation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
  • National High Technology Research and Development Program of China
  • National Science Foundation of China

Conference

W4A '17
W4A '17: Web For All 2017 - The Future of Accessible Work
April 2 - 4, 2017
Western Australia, Perth, Australia

Acceptance Rates

W4A '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 22 of 33 submissions, 67%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 171 of 371 submissions, 46%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Dynamic detection of accessibility smellsUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-023-01043-5Online publication date: 22-Sep-2023
  • (2022)An Initial Exploration of Tweets Associated With Web AccessibilityInternational Journal of Art, Culture, Design, and Technology10.4018/IJACDT.31284811:1(1-22)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Distilling Holistic Knowledge with Graph Neural Networks2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01022(10367-10376)Online publication date: Oct-2021
  • (2020)A Multi-site Collaborative Sampling for Web Accessibility EvaluationComputers Helping People with Special Needs10.1007/978-3-030-58796-3_39(329-335)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2020
  • (2019)Challenges of automatically evaluating rich internet applications accessibilityProceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication10.1145/3328020.3353950(1-6)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2019
  • (2018)Using Semi-supervised Group Sparse Regression to Improve Web Accessibility EvaluationComputers Helping People with Special Needs10.1007/978-3-319-94277-3_10(52-56)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media