Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1243441.1243465acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Quantitative metrics for measuring web accessibility

Published: 07 May 2007 Publication History

Abstract

This paper raises the need for quantitative accessibility measurement and proposes three different application scenarios where quantitative accessibility metrics are useful: Quality Assurance within Web Engineering, Information Retrieval and accessibility monitoring. We propose a quantitative metric which is automatically calculated from reports of automatic evaluation tools. In order to prove the reliability of the metric, 15 websites (1363 web pages) are measured based on results yielded by 2 evaluation tools: EvalAccess and LIFT. Statistical analysis of results shows that the metric is dependent on the evaluation tool. However, Spearman's test produces high correlation between results of different tools. Therefore, we conclude that the metric is reliable for ranking purposes in Information Retrieval and accessibility monitoring scenarios and can also be partially applied in a Web Engineering scenario.

References

[1]
Abascal, J., Arrue, M., Fajardo, I., Garay, N., and Tomás, J. Use of Guidelines to automatically verify web accessibility. International Journal on Universal Access in the Information Society (UAIS) 3(1), 71--79, 2004, Springer.
[2]
Arrue, M., Vigo, M., and Abascal, J. Quantitative Metrics for Web Accessibility Evaluation. In Proceedings of ICWE 2005 Workshop on Web Metrics and Measurement. University of Wollongong School of IT and Computer Science.
[3]
Brajnik, G. Comparing accessibility evaluation tools: a method for tool effectiveness. Universal Access in the Information Society (UAIS) 3(3-4), 252-263, 2004, Springer.
[4]
Bühler, C., Heck, H., Perlick, O., Nietzio, A., and Ullveit-Moe, N. Interpreting Results from Large Scale Automatic Evaluation of Web Accessibility. In K. Miesenberger et. al (Eds.). Computers Helping People with Special Needs 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4061. Springer, 184--191.
[5]
Google Accessible Search. Available at http://labs.google.com/accessible/
[6]
Hackett, S., Parmanto, B., and Zeng, X. Accessibility of Internet websites through time. In Proceedings of 6th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility 2004, pp. 32--39.
[7]
Ivory, M., Yu, S., and Gronemyer, K. Search result exploration: a preliminary study of blind and sighted users' decision making and performance. CHI Extended Abstracts 2004, pp. 1453--1456.
[8]
Mich, L., Franch, and M. Gaio, L. Evaluating and Designing the Quality of Web Sites. IEEE MultiMedia 10(1), 34--43, 2003.
[9]
Olsina, L. and Rossi, G. Measuring Web Application Quality with WebQEM. IEEE Multimedia 9(4), 20--29, 2002.
[10]
Snaprud, M. H., Ulltveit-Moe, N., Pillai, A. B., and Olsen M. G. A Proposed Architecture for Large Scale Web Accessibility Assessment. In K. Miesenberger et al. (Eds.). Computers Helping People with Special Needs 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4061, pp. 234--241, Springer.
[11]
Sullivan, T. and Matson, R. Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the Web's most popular sites. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Universal Usability 2000, pp. 139--144.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Breaking the News Barrier: Towards Understanding News Consumption Practices among BVI Individuals in IndiaProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675608(1-11)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Large-scale study of web accessibility metricsUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-022-00956-x23:1(411-434)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
  • (2022)A Systematic Review of Web Accessibility MetricsApp and Website Accessibility Developments and Compliance Strategies10.4018/978-1-7998-7848-3.ch004(77-108)Online publication date: 2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A)
May 2007
179 pages
ISBN:1595935908
DOI:10.1145/1243441
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 May 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. automatic evaluation
  2. measurement
  3. metrics
  4. quality assurance
  5. web accessibility

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

W4A '07 Paper Acceptance Rate 11 of 27 submissions, 41%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 171 of 371 submissions, 46%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)70
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Breaking the News Barrier: Towards Understanding News Consumption Practices among BVI Individuals in IndiaProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675608(1-11)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Large-scale study of web accessibility metricsUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-022-00956-x23:1(411-434)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
  • (2022)A Systematic Review of Web Accessibility MetricsApp and Website Accessibility Developments and Compliance Strategies10.4018/978-1-7998-7848-3.ch004(77-108)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)Accessible and Inclusive Cyber Security: A Nuanced and Complex ChallengeSN Computer Science10.1007/s42979-022-01239-13:5Online publication date: 22-Jun-2022
  • (2021)Accessibility Compliance for E-Government WebsitesResearch Anthology on Digital Transformation, Organizational Change, and the Impact of Remote Work10.4018/978-1-7998-7297-9.ch019(354-373)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Diversity of Web accessibility in tourism: Evidence based on a literature reviewTechnology and Disability10.3233/TAD-21034133:4(253-272)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2021
  • (2021)User Experience and Trustworthiness Measurement: Challenges in the Context of e-Commerce ApplicationsProceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2021, Volume 110.1007/978-3-030-89906-6_13(173-192)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2021
  • (2020)Towards an evaluation method of how accessible serious games are to older adults2020 IEEE 8th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH)10.1109/SeGAH49190.2020.9201655(1-8)Online publication date: Aug-2020
  • (2019)Accessibility Compliance for E-Government WebsitesInternational Journal of Electronic Government Research10.4018/IJEGR.201904010115:2(1-18)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019
  • (2019)An Identity Model for Providing Inclusive Services and ApplicationsApplied Sciences10.3390/app91838139:18(3813)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media