Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2909132.2909269acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Go With the Flow: Effects of Transparency and User Control on Targeted Advertising Using Flow Charts

Published: 07 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Targeted advertising reaches users based on various traits, such as demographics or behaviour. However, users are often reluctant to accept ads. We hypothesise that users are more open to targeted advertising if they can inspect, control and thereby understand the process of ad selection. We conducted a between-subjects study (N=200) to investigate to what extent four key aspects of ads (Quality, Behavioural Intention, Understanding and Attitude) may be affected by transparency and user control using a flow chart. Our results indicate that positive effects of flow charts reported from other domains may also be applicable to advertising: Using flow charts to provide transparency together with user control is found to have more positive effects on domain-specific quality measures than established, text-based approaches and using either of the techniques in isolation. The paper concludes with recommendations for practitioners aiming to improve user response to ads.

References

[1]
About facebook advertising. https://www.facebook.com/about/ads/. Accessed: 2015-10-05.
[2]
Iab internet advertising revenue report. http://www.iab.net/about_the_iab/recent_press_releases/press_release_archive/press_release/pr-061115. Accessed: 2015-09-04.
[3]
The ibm watson personality insights service. https://watson-pi-demo.mybluemix.net/. Accessed: 2015-09-08.
[4]
L. Agarwal, N. Shrivastava, S. Jaiswal, and S. Panjwani. Do not embarrass: Re-examining user concerns for online tracking and advertising. In Proc. SOUPS '13, pages 8:1--8:13. ACM, 2013.
[5]
H. Badenes, M. N. Bengualid, J. Chen, L. Gou, et al. System u: automatically deriving personality traits from social media for people recommendation. In Proc. RecSys '14, pages 373--374. ACM, 2014.
[6]
F. Bakalov, M.-J. Meurs, B. König-Ries, B. Sateli, et al. An approach to controlling user models and personalization effects in recommender systems. In Proc. IUI '13, pages 49--56. ACM, 2013.
[7]
H. Beales. The value of behavioral targeting. Network Advertising Initiative, 2010.
[8]
D. Bogdanov, M. Haro, F. Fuhrmann, A. Xambó, et al. Semantic audio content-based music recommendation and visualization based on user preference examples. Inform. Proc. & Management, 49(1):13--33, 2013.
[9]
S. Bostandjiev, J. O'Donovan, and T. Höllerer. Tasteweights: A visual interactive hybrid recommender system. In Proc. RecSys '15, pages 35--42. ACM, 2012.
[10]
M. Burke, A. Hornof, E. Nilsen, and N. Gorman. High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten. ACM TOCHI, 12(4):423--445, 2005.
[11]
D. E. Campbell and R. T. Wright. Shut-up i don't care: Understanding the role of relevance and interactivity on customer attitudes toward repetitive online advertising. Journal of E-commerce Research, 9(1):62--76, 2008.
[12]
H. Cramer. Effects of ad quality & content-relevance on perceived content quality. In Proc. CHI '15, pages 2231--2234. ACM, 2015.
[13]
L. F. Cranor. Can users control online behavioral advertising effectively? Security & Privacy, IEEE, 10(2):93--96, 2012.
[14]
T. Crews and U. Ziegler. The flowchart interpreter for introductory programming courses. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998. FIE'98. 28th Annual, volume 1, pages 307--312. IEEE, 1998.
[15]
C. A. Eldering. Advertisement selection system supporting discretionary target market characteristics, Apr. 10 2001. US Patent 6,216,129.
[16]
A. Farahat and M. C. Bailey. How effective is targeted advertising? In Proc. WWW '12, pages 111--120. ACM, 2012.
[17]
R. E. Goldsmith, B. A. Lafferty, and S. J. Newell. The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3):43--54, 2000.
[18]
D. G. Goldstein, R. P. McAfee, and S. Suri. The cost of annoying ads. In Proc WWW '13, pages 459--470, 2013.
[19]
J. B. Hirsh, S. K. Kang, and G. V. Bodenhausen. Personalized persuasion tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients' personality traits. Psychological science, 23(6):578--581, 2012.
[20]
S. B. Insights. Us framework and vals types, 2013.
[21]
J. J. Kacen and J. A. Lee. The influence of culture on consumer impulsive buying behavior. Journal of consumer psychology, 12(2):163--176, 2002.
[22]
W. Kamarulzaman and M. S. Nordin. Confirmatory factor analysis on the big 5 personality test inventory. Online Submission, 2012.
[23]
A. Kangasrääsiö, D. Glowacka, and S. Kaski. Improving controllability and predictability of interactive recommendation interfaces for exploratory search. In Proc. IUI '15, pages 247--251. ACM, 2015.
[24]
A. Kardan and M. Hooman. Targeted advertisement in social networks using recommender systems. In Proc. ECDC '13, pages 1--13. IEEE, 2013.
[25]
J. Kennedy, M. Graham, T. Paterson, and A. Law. Visual cleaning of genotype data. In Proc. BioVis '13, pages 105--112. IEEE, 2013.
[26]
A. Kittur, E. H. Chi, and B. Suh. Crowdsourcing user studies with mechanical turk. In Proc. CHI '08, pages 453--456. ACM, 2008.
[27]
P. J. Lavrakas. An evaluation of methods used to assess the effectiveness of advertising on the internet. Interactive Advertising Bureau Research Papers, 2010.
[28]
P. G. Leon, B. Ur, Y. Wang, M. Sleeper, et al. What matters to users?: Factors that affect users' willingness to share information with online advertisers. In Proc SOUPS '13, pages 7:1--7:12. ACM, 2013.
[29]
B. Liu, A. Sheth, U. Weinsberg, J. Chandrashekar, et al. Adreveal: Improving transparency into online targeted advertising. In Proc. HotNets '13, page 12. ACM, 2013.
[30]
M. Malheiros, C. Jennett, S. Patel, S. Brostoff, et al. Too close for comfort: A study of the effectiveness and acceptability of rich-media personalized advertising. In Proc. CHI '12, pages 579--588. ACM, 2012.
[31]
G. S. K. Niazi, J. Siddiqui, B. Alishah, and A. I. Hunjra. Effective advertising and its influence on consumer buying behavior. Information management and business review, 4(3):114--119, 2012.
[32]
K. O'Donnell and H. Cramer. People's perceptions of personalized ads. In Proc. WWW '15 Companion, pages 1293--1298. WWW Steering Committee, 2015.
[33]
J. O'Donovan, B. Smyth, B. Gretarsson, S. Bostandjiev, et al. Peerchooser: Visual interactive recommendation. In Proc. CHI '08, pages 1085--1088. ACM, 2008.
[34]
P. Pu, L. Chen, and R. Hu. A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems. In Proc. RecSys '11, pages 157--164. ACM, 2011.
[35]
M. Richardson, E. Dominowska, and R. Ragno. Predicting clicks: Estimating the click-through rate for new ads. In Proc. ACM'07, pages 521--530. ACM.
[36]
D. Searls. Project vrm. http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/projectvrm/Main_Page/. Accessed: 2015-09-04.
[37]
J. Stávková, L. Stejskal, and Z. Toufarová. Factors influencing consumer behaviour. ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA-PRAHA-, 54(6):276, 2008.
[38]
V. Toubiana, A. Narayanan, D. Boneh, H. Nissenbaum, et al. Adnostic: Privacy preserving targeted advertising. In Proc. NDSS '11, 2010.
[39]
B. Ur, P. G. Leon, L. F. Cranor, R. Shay, et al. Smart, useful, scary, creepy: Perceptions of online behavioral advertising. In Proc. SOUPS '12, pages 4:1--4:15. ACM, 2012.
[40]
K. Van Heel, B. Knegtering, and A. Brombacher. Safety lifecycle management. a flowchart presentation of the iec 61508 overall safety lifecycle model. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 15(6):493--500, 1999.
[41]
K. Verbert, D. Parra, P. Brusilovsky, and E. Duval. Visualizing recommendations to support exploration, transparency and controllability. In Proc. IUI '13, pages 351--362. ACM, 2013.
[42]
W. Wang and I. Benbasat. Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: Effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4):217--246, 2007.
[43]
X. Wu, J. Yan, N. Liu, S. Yan, et al. Probabilistic latent semantic user segmentation for behavioral targeted advertising. In Proc. DDAIA, pages 10--17. ACM, 2009.
[44]
J. Yan, N. Liu, G. Wang, W. Zhang, et al. How much can behavioral targeting help online advertising? In Proc. WWW '09, pages 261--270. ACM, 2009.
[45]
J. H. Yu and B. Cude. "hello, mrs. sarah jones! we recommend this product!"consumers' perceptions about personalized advertising: comparisons across advertisements delivered via three different types of media. International journal of consumer studies, 33(4):503--514, 2009.
[46]
P. W. Yue and R. Anderson. Capturing electronic journals management in a flowchart. The Serials Librarian, 51(3-4):101--118, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Visualization for Recommendation Explainability: A Survey and New PerspectivesACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/367227614:3(1-40)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Enhancing Transparency of Political Micro-targeting on FacebookCode and Conscience10.1007/978-3-031-52082-2_4(47-62)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Justification vs. Transparency: Why and How Visual Explanations in a Scientific Literature Recommender SystemInformation10.3390/info1407040114:7(401)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AVI '16: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
June 2016
400 pages
ISBN:9781450341318
DOI:10.1145/2909132
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 June 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Targeted advertising
  2. ow chart
  3. transparency
  4. user control

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

AVI '16

Acceptance Rates

AVI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 20 of 96 submissions, 21%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 128 of 490 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Visualization for Recommendation Explainability: A Survey and New PerspectivesACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/367227614:3(1-40)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Enhancing Transparency of Political Micro-targeting on FacebookCode and Conscience10.1007/978-3-031-52082-2_4(47-62)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Justification vs. Transparency: Why and How Visual Explanations in a Scientific Literature Recommender SystemInformation10.3390/info1407040114:7(401)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2023
  • (2023)CRS-Que: A User-centric Evaluation Framework for Conversational Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36315342:1(1-34)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2023
  • (2023)An Argumentative Framework for Generating Explainable Group RecommendationsAdjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3563359.3597387(266-274)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Less is Not More: Improving Findability and Actionability of Privacy Controls for Online Behavioral AdvertisingProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580773(1-33)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Interactive Visualizations of Transparent User Models for Self-Actualization: A Human-Centered Design ApproachMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti60600426:6(42)Online publication date: 30-May-2022
  • (2022)A Systematic Review of Interaction Design Strategies for Group Recommendation SystemsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551616:CSCW2(1-51)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Towards a Construction Kit for Visual Recommender SystemsProceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces10.1145/3531073.3534484(1-3)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Explaining User Models with Different Levels of Detail for Transparent Recommendation: A User StudyAdjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3511047.3537685(175-183)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media