Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2740908.2742003acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

People's Perceptions of Personalized Ads

Published: 18 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Advertising is key to the business model of many online services. Personalization aims to make ads more relevant for users and more effective for advertisers. However, relatively few studies into user attitudes towards personalized ads are available. We present a San Francisco Bay Area survey (N=296) and in-depth interviews (N=24) with teens and adults. People are divided and often either (strongly) agreed or disagreed about utility or invasiveness of personalized ads and associated data collection. Mobile ads were reported to be less relevant than those on desktop. Participants explained ad personalization based on their personal previous behaviors and guesses about demographic targeting. We describe both metrics improvements as well as opportunities for improving online advertising by focusing on positive ad interactions reported by our participants, such as personalization focused not just on product categories but specific brands and styles, awareness of life events, and situations in which ads were useful or even inspirational.

References

[1]
Agarwal, L., Shrivastava, N., Jaiswal, S., Panjwani, S. Do Not Embarrass: Re-Examining User Concerns for Online Tracking and Advertising, Proc. SOUPS 2013.
[2]
boyd, d. and Marwick, Alice E., Social Privacy in Networked Publics: Teens' Attitudes, Practices, and Strategies (2011). Proc.A Decade inInternet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internetand Society.
[3]
Cramer, H., Evers, V., Van Someren, M., Wielinga, B. (2009) Awareness, Training and Trust in Interaction with Adaptive Spam Filters, Proc. CHI'09.
[4]
De Sa, M., Navalpakkam, V., & Churchill, E. (2013). Mobile advertising: evaluating the effects of animation, user and content relevance. Proc. CHI'13, 2487--2496.
[5]
Goldstein, P. and McAfee, S. (2013) The Cost of Annoying Ads, Proc. WWW'13, 459--470.
[6]
Kelly, L., Kerr, G.,Drennan, J. (2010). Avoidance of advertising in social networking sites: The teenage perspective. J. Interactive Advertising, 10(2), 16--27.
[7]
Leon, P.G., Ur, B. Wang, Y., Sleeper, M., Balebako, R. Shay, R. Bauer, L., Christodorescu, M. Cranor, L.F. What Matters to Users' Factors thatAffect Users' Willingness to Share Information with Online Advertisers, Proc. SOUPS'13.
[8]
Leon, P., Ur, B, Shay, R, Wang, Y., Balebako, R. Cranor. L. Why Johnny can't opt-out, a usability evaluation of tools to limit online behavioral advertising, Proc. CHI'12, 589--598.
[9]
Paskevich, M., Dorai-Raj, S., Kellar, M., Zikgmond, D. Empowering online advertisements by empowering viewers with the right to choose, J. of Advertising Research, Dec, 2012.
[10]
Madden, M., Lenhart, A.,Cortesi,S., Gasser, U. Duggan, M., Smith,A. and Beaton, M. Teens, Social Media, and Privacy, Pew Research CenterReport, May 2013.
[11]
Malheiros, M., Jennett, C., Patel, S., Broffstoff, S., Sasse, M. A. (2012). Too close for comfort: a study of the effectiveness and acceptability of rich-media personalized advertising. Proc. CHI'12 579--588.
[12]
McDonald, A., Cranor, L.F. Americans' Attitudes About Internet Behavioral Advertising Practices, Proc. WPES'10.
[13]
Odom, W. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. (2011). Teenagers and Their Virtual Possessions: Design Opportunities and Issues. Proc. CHI'11, 1491--1500.
[14]
Rohrer, C., & Boyd, J. (2004). The rise of intrusive online advertising and the response of user experience research'04, 1085--1086.
[15]
Ur, B., Leon, P. G., Cranor, L. F., Shay, R., & Wang, Y. (2012). Smart, useful, scary, creepy: perceptions of online behavioral advertising. Proc. SOUPS'12.
[16]
White, T., Zahay, D., Thorbjornsen, H., Shavitt, S. (2008) Getting too personal: reactions to highlypersonalized email solicitations. Marketing Letters, 19 (1), 39--50.
[17]
Yan, J., Liu,N., Wang,G., Zhang, W. Jiang,Y. and Chen, Z. How much can behavioral targeting help online advertising?, Proc. WWW'09, 261--270.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Perspectives of Young Digital Natives on Digital Marketing: Exploring Annoyance and Effectiveness with Eye-Tracking AnalysisFuture Internet10.3390/fi1604012516:4(125)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Teaching Middle Schoolers about the Privacy Threats of Tracking and Pervasive Personalization: A Classroom Intervention Using Design-Based ResearchProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642460(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Online Ads Annoyance Factors: A Survey of Computer Science StudentsOnline Advertising [Working Title]10.5772/intechopen.110169Online publication date: 23-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. People's Perceptions of Personalized Ads

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '15 Companion: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web
    May 2015
    1602 pages
    ISBN:9781450334730
    DOI:10.1145/2740908

    Sponsors

    • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 May 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. advertising
    2. personalization

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WWW '15
    Sponsor:
    • IW3C2

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)129
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Perspectives of Young Digital Natives on Digital Marketing: Exploring Annoyance and Effectiveness with Eye-Tracking AnalysisFuture Internet10.3390/fi1604012516:4(125)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Teaching Middle Schoolers about the Privacy Threats of Tracking and Pervasive Personalization: A Classroom Intervention Using Design-Based ResearchProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642460(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)Online Ads Annoyance Factors: A Survey of Computer Science StudentsOnline Advertising [Working Title]10.5772/intechopen.110169Online publication date: 23-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Defining "broken"Proceedings of the 32nd USENIX Conference on Security Symposium10.5555/3620237.3620440(3619-3636)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
    • (2022)Examining the effects of Facebook’s personalized advertisements on brand loveJournal of Marketing Theory and Practice10.1080/10696679.2022.209663732:1(61-80)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
    • (2021)Deciding on personalized adsProceedings of the Seventeenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3563572.3563602(573-595)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2021
    • (2021)Exploring Email-Prompted Information NeedsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34798615:CSCW2(1-33)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
    • (2021)AdverTiming Matters: Examining User Ad Consumption for Effective Ad Allocations on Social MediaProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445394(1-18)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
    • (2021)MulUBA: multi-level visual analytics of user behaviors for improving online shopping advertisingJournal of Visualization10.1007/s12650-021-00771-1Online publication date: 22-Aug-2021
    • (2020)TargetingVis: visual exploration and analysis of targeted advertising dataJournal of Visualization10.1007/s12650-020-00671-wOnline publication date: 10-Jul-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media