Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Automatic RTL Test Generation from SystemC TLM Specifications

Published: 01 July 2012 Publication History

Abstract

SystemC transaction-level modeling (TLM) is widely used to enable early exploration for both hardware and software designs. It can reduce the overall design and validation effort of complex system-on-chip (SOC) architectures. However, due to lack of automated techniques coupled with limited reuse of validation efforts between abstraction levels, SOC validation is becoming a major bottleneck. This article presents a novel top-down methodology for automatically generating register transfer-level (RTL) tests from SystemC TLM specifications. It makes two important contributions: i) it proposes a method that can automatically generate TLM tests using various coverage metrics, and (ii) it develops a test refinement specification for automatically converting TLM tests to RTL tests in order to reduce overall validation effort. We have developed a tool which incorporates these activities to enable automated RTL test generation from SystemC TLM specifications. Case studies using a router example and a 64-bit Alpha AXP pipelined processor demonstrate that our approach can achieve intended functional coverage of the RTL designs, as well as capture various functional errors and inconsistencies between specifications and implementations.

References

[1]
Abdi, S. and Gajski, D. 2005. A formalism for functionality preserving system level transformations. In Proceedings of the Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASPDAC). 139--144.
[2]
Abrar, S. and Thimmapuram, A. 2010. Functional refinement: A generic methodology for managing ESL abstractions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on VLSI Design (VLSID). 122--127.
[3]
Ammann, P., Black, P., and Majurski, W. 1998. Using model checking to generate tests from specifications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods (ICFEM). 46--54.
[4]
Ara, K. and Suzuki, K. 2003. A proposal for transaction-level verification with component wrapper language. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference: Designers’ Forum. 20082.
[5]
Beyer, D., Chlipala, A., Henzinger, T., Jhala, R., and Majumdar, R. 2004. Generating tests from counterexamples. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). 326--335.
[6]
Bombieri, N., Fummi, F., and Pravadelli, G. 2006. On the evaluation of transactor-based verification for reusing TLM assertions and testbenches at RTL. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation, and Test in Europe Conference (DATE). 1--6.
[7]
Bombieri, N., Fummi, F., and Pravadelli, G. 2007. Incremental ABV for functional validation of TL-to-RTL design refinement. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference (DATE). 882--887.
[8]
Bombieri, N., Fummi, F., Pravadelli, G., and Marques-Silva, J. 2007. Towards equivalence checking between TLM and RTL models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Co-Design (MEMOCODE). 113--122.
[9]
Bruce, A., Hashmi, M., Nightingale, A., Beavis, S., Romdhane, N., and Lennard, C. 2006. Maintaining consistency between SystemC and RTL system designs. In Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference (DAC). 85--89.
[10]
Cai, L. and Gajski, D. 2003. Transaction level modeling: An overview. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS). 19--24.
[11]
Chen, M. and Mishra, P. 2010. Functional test generation using efficient property clustering and learning techniques. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 29, 3, 396--404.
[12]
Chen, M. and Mishra, P. 2011. Decision ordering based property decomposition for functional test generation. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference (DATE). 167--172.
[13]
Chen, M. and Mishra, P. 2011. Property learning techniques for efficient generation of directed tests. IEEE Trans. Comput. 60, 6, 852--864.
[14]
Chen, M., Mishra, P., and Kalita, D. 2007. Towards RTL test generation from SystemC TLM specifications. In Proceedings of the International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT). 91--96.
[15]
Chen, M., Qin, X., and Mishra, P. 2010. Efficient decision ordering techniques for SAT-based test generation. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference (DATE). 490--495.
[16]
Fedeli, A., Fummi, F., and Pravadelli, G. 2007. Properties incompleteness evaluation by functional verification. IEEE Trans. Comput. 56, 4, 528--544.
[17]
Ferrandi, F., Fummi, F., Gerli, L., and Sciuto, D. 1999. Symbolic functional vector generation for VHDL specifications. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference (DATE). 442--446.
[18]
Fin, A., Fummi, F., Poncino, M., and Pravadelli, G. 2003. A SystemC-based framework for properties incompleteness evaluation. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Microprocessor Test and Verification (MTV). 89--94.
[19]
Ghenassia, F. 2005. Transaction Level Modeling with SystemC. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
[20]
Habibi, A. and Tahar, S. 2004. Partial order reduction for scalable testing of SystemC TLM designs. In Proceedings of the International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT). 19--22.
[21]
Habibi, A. and Tahar, S. 2006. Design and verification of SystemC transaction-level models. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. 14, 1, 57--68.
[22]
Jensen, K. 1997. A brief introduction to coloured Petri nets. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS). 203--208.
[23]
Jindal, R. and Jain, K. 2003. Verification of transaction-level SystemC models using RTL testbenches. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Co-Design (MEMOCODE). 199--203.
[24]
Karlsson, D., Eles, P., and Peng, Z. 2006. Formal verification of SystemC designs using a Petri-net based representation. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation, and Test in Europe Conference (DATE). 1228--1233.
[25]
Koo, H. and Mishra, P. 2009. Functional test generation using design and property decomposition techniques. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 8, 4.
[26]
Kroening, D. and Sharygina, N. 2005. Formal verification of SystemC by automatic hardware/software partitioning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Co-Design (MEMOCODE). 101--110.
[27]
Kupferman, O. and Vardi, M. 1999. Vacuity detection in temporal model checking. In Proceedings of the Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods Conference (CHARME). 82--96.
[28]
Lahbib, Y., Kamdem, R., Benalycherif, M., and Tourki, R. 2005. An automatic ABV methodology enabling PSL assertions across SLD flow for SoCs modeled in SystemC. Comput. Electr. Engi. 31, 4, 282--302.
[29]
Larsen, K., Pettersson, P., and Wang, Y. 1997. UPPAAL in a nutshell. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transfer 1, 1--2, 134--152.
[30]
Mishra, P. and Dutt, N. 2008. Specification-driven directed test generation for validation of pipelined processors. ACM Trans. Des. Autom. Electr. Syst. 13, 3, 1--36.
[31]
Moy, M., Maraninchi, F., and Maillet-Contoz, L. 2005. Lussy: A toolbox for the analysis of systems-on-a-chip at the transactional level. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design. 26--35.
[32]
Rose, A., Swan, S., Pierce, J., and Fernandez, J. M. 2005. Transaction level modeling with SystemC. http://systemc.org.
[33]
Strichman, O. 2001. Pruning techniques for the SAT-based bounded model checking problem. In Proceedings of the Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods Conference (CHARME). 58--70.
[34]
Wang, Z. and Ye, Y. 2005. The improvement for transaction level verification functional coverage. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). 5850--5853.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Incremental Concolic Testing of Register-Transfer Level DesignsACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems10.1145/365562129:3(1-23)Online publication date: 3-May-2024
  • (2023)Directed Test Generation for Hardware Validation: A SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/363804656:5(1-36)Online publication date: 19-Dec-2023
  • (2022)A Survey on Assertion-based Hardware VerificationACM Computing Surveys10.1145/351057854:11s(1-33)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems  Volume 11, Issue 2
July 2012
342 pages
ISSN:1539-9087
EISSN:1558-3465
DOI:10.1145/2220336
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Journal Family

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2012
Accepted: 01 March 2011
Revised: 01 December 2010
Received: 01 August 2009
Published in TECS Volume 11, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Transaction-level modeling
  2. model checking
  3. test generation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Incremental Concolic Testing of Register-Transfer Level DesignsACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems10.1145/365562129:3(1-23)Online publication date: 3-May-2024
  • (2023)Directed Test Generation for Hardware Validation: A SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/363804656:5(1-36)Online publication date: 19-Dec-2023
  • (2022)A Survey on Assertion-based Hardware VerificationACM Computing Surveys10.1145/351057854:11s(1-33)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2022
  • (2022)RemembERR: Leveraging Microprocessor Errata for Design Testing and ValidationProceedings of the 55th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture10.1109/MICRO56248.2022.00081(1126-1143)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022
  • (2021)Directed Test Generation for Activation of Security Assertions in RTL ModelsACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems10.1145/344129726:4(1-28)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Equivalent Faults under Launch-on-Shift (LOS) Tests with Equal Primary Input VectorsACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems10.1145/344001326:4(1-15)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2021
  • (2021)ExperienceJournal of Data and Information Quality10.1145/343930713:1(1-16)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2021
  • (2021)A Map Inference Approach Using Signal Processing from Crowd-sourced GPS DataACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/34317857:2(1-23)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2021
  • (2021)ExperienceJournal of Data and Information Quality10.1145/342815513:1(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Solving Linear Programs in the Current Matrix Multiplication TimeJournal of the ACM10.1145/342430568:1(1-39)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media