CBet Casino Review

The player from Argentina faced repeated delays in withdrawing funds from cbet.gg, with various excuses given including provider issues and platform policies. The player's account was put under review, the withdrawal option was disabled, and they were repeatedly asked to wait 72 hours. Despite initial communication, the player failed to respond to follow-up questions and provide the necessary information. Consequently, the complaint was rejected due to lack of cooperation from the player.

The player from Alabama had deposited $25, won $2025, and attempted to withdraw, but had not been paid. We had requested additional information from the player but did not receive a response. Consequently, the complaint was rejected due to a lack of cooperation from the player.

The player from Argentina had his account locked due to an alleged anomaly just before making a large withdrawal. Customer service was blocked and he could not reach the manager. We determined that the complaint could not be resolved as the casino had a history of not responding to mediation efforts. The complaint was closed as 'unresolved,' which negatively impacted the casino's rating.

The player from Austria deposited €400 with the intention of playing through once in order to withdraw, as per the T&Cs. However, they were informed of a new playthrough requirement of €12400, 31 times more, despite having no active bonuses. The casino's explanation about this policy did not satisfy the player. We investigated the issue but were unable to resolve it due to the casino's consistent lack of response to our mediation attempts, leading to the complaint being closed as 'unresolved'.

The player from Argentina has issues withdrawing money from the casino, receiving an 'Action is blocked' notification. Despite being told the issue had been resolved, the problem persists. The player's account was blocked, stated by the CBET management citing security system anomaly. The player denies any wrongdoing and insists all KYC obligations have been fulfilled.

The player from France, who was fully verified and had made successful withdrawals in the past, had issues with blocked withdrawals. Despite having contacted customer service, he received no response for a week. We had attempted to mediate with the casino, but due to their history of non-cooperation, we were unable to resolve the issue. Consequently, the player's complaint was closed as 'unresolved', which negatively impacted the casino's overall rating. We had advised the player to steer clear of this particular casino.

The player from Argentina had won a significant amount at CBet Casino and was promised a payout after a delay due to site maintenance. However, the casino had accused the player of having a fraudulent account and banned them from playing. We had attempted to assist the player and asked for additional information to further investigate the issue, but the player did not respond to our messages. Consequently, we were unable to proceed with the investigation or provide potential solutions, which led to the rejection of the complaint.

The player from Argentina had reported a sudden deactivation of his casino account without any given reason or prior notice. This issue had led to an inability to withdraw his winnings for a week. The player had stated that he had accumulated his winnings without an active bonus. We were unable to resolve the issue due to the casino's 'No Reaction Policy'. Consequently, the player's complaint had been marked as 'unresolved'.

The player from Argentina had issues with CBET casino. After winning 160,000 Argentine pesos, he tried to withdraw it only to find his account had been permanently closed due to allegations of fraud and anomalies. The casino's support had been unresponsive. The player had focused on live roulette and blackjack games, using deposited money without bonuses. Due to the history of unresponsiveness of this casino, we were forced to close the complaint as 'unresolved'.

The player from Nigeria had trouble with withdrawals at cbet.gg, due to escalating wager requirements that seemed to prevent withdrawal attempts. Initially, the player was told he just needed to wager his deposit, however, after doing so, the requirements had significantly increased. Given the history of unresolved complaints, we were forced to close the case as 'unresolved', affecting the casino's overall rating. We recommended the player file a complaint to the casino's regulator, Gaming Curaçao.

The player from Brazil had complained about the severe inconvenience caused by account operation in CBet Casino. After a series of problematic experiences - including high turnover, delayed withdrawals, and an unexpected account block - the player had challenged the house's management to justify the issues. Despite the player having confirmed full account verification and provided evidence of winnings, we were unable to resolve the complaint due to the casino's lack of cooperation. The casino had a history of ignoring our mediation attempts, forcing us to close the complaint as 'unresolved', which negatively impacted the casino's rating. Our recommendation was to avoid CBet Casino.

The player from Argentina had won a substantial amount of money at the casino. His account had been closed by the casino management due to 'anomalies' and he hadn't been given any further explanation or been able to communicate with them since. The player's account had been fully verified and he had played with real money, mainly on live Roulette and Blackjack. Despite our attempts to mediate, we had to mark the complaint as 'unresolved' due to the casino's non-responsive history. We had made numerous attempts to communicate with the casino, but all had been ignored. This unresolved complaint was going to negatively impact the casino's rating. We had advised caution when dealing with this casino.

The player from Argentina had his account deactivated after he won significant amounts from the casino. He was flagged for alleged anomalies even though his account had been fully verified and everything had been legal. He couldn't create a new account due to a permanent ban, which he believed was unjustified. He confirmed that multiple family members also played at the same casino, using the same IP address but separate accounts. Unfortunately, we were unable to assist the player in resolving this issue due to the casino's lack of cooperation, as was evidenced by multiple unresolved cases. Consequently, the complaint was closed as unresolved, which negatively impacted the casino's overall rating.

The player from Argentina had made two withdrawals from Cbet and subsequently lost access to his account due to an alleged issue with a Google link. Despite having communicated with the casino for 17 days, he had only received responses instructing him to wait. We had attempted to investigate the issue further, but due to the player's lack of response to our inquiries, we were unable to proceed. As a result, the complaint was rejected.

The player from Argentina had deposited and accumulated winnings of $30,000. He had encountered issues when he tried to withdraw $2,500, with the casino failing to address his request. Despite having raised a 'priority' ticket, he had experienced continuous delays from customer service. We had attempted to resolve the issue, but due to a lack of response from the player, we had to reject the case. We had emphasized that the player could have reopened the complaint in the future if he desired.

The player complained about their account being closed. First, the casino had deactivated their ability to withdraw without specifying any reason, and later their account was under investigation. The player was blocked and unable to contact the live chat. There have been no further updates, and the complaint is currently marked unresolved.

The player complained about their withdrawal being canceled without any reason. Additionally, player's funds were not returned to their account. There have been no further updates, and the complaint is currently marked unresolved.

The player from Ontario had his winnings frozen due to technical issues after adjusting his bet amount and being told to only play in the casino and not place bets on sports. He complained about poor technical support and misunderstandings related to the site's operation and rules. After the player provided evidence regarding these issue, we concluded we unfortunately cannot assist in this case, since the casino has a no reaction policy towards our service.

The player from Argentina had his casino account suspended after some winnings. A pending withdrawal of 221 USDT and 31,000 ARS was stuck due to the issue. The casino's customer support had provided a generic message and blocked the player from chat. The player confirmed he had received winnings from this casino before, but couldn't access his withdrawal history due to the account block. We had closed the complaint as 'unresolved' due to the casino's 'No Reaction Policy' and its history of ignoring attempts at mediation.

The player from Italy had experienced a withdrawal delay. He had won 66000 euros, converted them into Bitcoin, and asked to withdraw to his crypto wallet. Despite passing all KYC checks his withdrawal remained pending after 6 days. The player had reported that he only received a single win of 85 euros. However, due to the casino's history of unresolved complaints and its 'No Reaction Policy', we were forced to close the player's complaint as 'unresolved'.

The player from North Rhine-Westphalia had won 5600 Euros and had requested segmented payouts. However, the casino had canceled these payouts and allegedly transferred the funds to an unknown cryptocurrency account. The player had claimed that the casino used the excuse of their account being hacked to justify this action. Despite our request for further details and communication records with the casino, the player did not respond. As a result, we were unable to investigate the matter further and had to reject the complaint.

The player from Argentina had a withdrawal restriction imposed by CBET casino, despite having fulfilled turnover and bonus requirements and successfully completing the KYC process. She mentioned having another account associated with the same IP but under her boyfriend's name; he had previously withdrawn without any issues. Despite her efforts to resolve the issue, the casino had not provided clear reasons for the restriction. The player's winnings were achieved with the help of a bonus. We had recommended the player to seek help from websites that deal with sports betting issues as we lacked the insight to resolve this type of issue. The complaint was rejected due to the nature of the issue being related to sports betting.

The player from Argentina had deposited AR$5,000 and won approximately AR$9,000. However, the casino was then requiring him to reach a pot of over AR$133,000 to withdraw his winnings, despite an initial requirement of AR$20,000 plus AR$2,000 in taxes. His account had been verified and he hadn't used any bonus. The casino's argument was to prevent fraudulent bets. However, we had to close the complaint as 'unresolved' due to the casino's history of non-responsiveness. This negatively impacted the casino's overall rating. Despite our numerous attempts to communicate with the casino, all our efforts had been unsuccessful. We strongly advised the player to avoid this casino.

The player from Brazil requested a withdrawal, but the funds were returned to the casino account due to a bank issue. Despite reassurances from the casino and multiple inquiries, the payout has not been processed. The complaint was closed as 'unresolved' as the casino has more than 15 cases marked “No Reaction Policy”.

The player from Argentina had faced issues with his account verification, which had prevented him from withdrawing his winnings. Despite having reached out to the casino's support team, he had received no updates or account verification ticket after three days. The Complaints Team had extended the response time by seven days and had sought additional information about the documents he had provided. However, due to the player's lack of response to their inquiries, they had been unable to further investigate the matter and had had to reject the complaint.

The player from Argentina was facing issues with withdrawing his winnings from CBet Casino due to a high wagering requirement. Despite having fulfilled the requirement by betting double his deposit amount, the withdrawal process remained problematic. The player had passed the KYC verification and this was his first attempt to withdraw money. We attempted to mediate the situation, however, CBet Casino had a history of non-cooperation and ignored our communication efforts. As a result, we had to close the complaint as 'unresolved', which negatively impacted the casino's rating. We advised the player to avoid CBet Casino due to their uncooperative behavior.

The player from Argentine has an issue withdrawing $1,750,000 via astropay. The transaction was originally in ARS but it was somehow cancelled and allegedly converted into USDT without the player's authorization. The player has contacted the support team but is still awaiting a response.

The player from Argentina had his account blocked after he experienced a glitch in the casino's slot machine. He had registered his account about 6 months prior, had completed all verification processes, and had played slots without using a bonus. His winnings, which were approximately a million, were being withheld due to the account block. Unfortunately, we had to mark his complaint as "unresolved" due to the casino's history of non-responsiveness. Despite our numerous attempts to communicate, the casino had consistently ignored us, which led to a decrease in their overall rating.

The player from Argentina had experienced a refund issue with Cbet, an online casino that reportedly owed him 7,000 USDT. Despite a month of waiting, his account had been cleared without any receipt of funds and he had been left waiting for an email. The player had communicated daily with the casino's support team and alleged contradictions in their responses. After the player provided screenshots and other evidence, the Complaints Team had attempted to contact the casino for clarification. Unfortunately, due to the casino's history of non-responsiveness, the team had been unable to make progress. As a result, the complaint was closed as unresolved, negatively impacting the casino's overall rating.

The player from Chile had issues with Cbet Casino. After winning 1,700,000 Chilean pesos, he had requested a withdrawal, but after two days the withdrawal was rejected and the money was converted into USDT without his consent. This resulted in a temporary account suspension and an investigation was initiated. Despite the player's full cooperation and provision of all necessary verification, the casino had not responded to our attempts to mediate the issue. Due to the casino's history of non-cooperation, we were forced to close the complaint as 'unresolved', which negatively impacted the casino's rating.

The player from Argentina deposited 50,000 pesos, but has been asked to bet 1 million pesos before withdrawal, due to an active bonus. Despite support suggesting the turnover requirement would reset after 24 hours post-bonus, this did not occur. The complaint was closed as unresolved as the casino has no reaction policy.

The player from Argentina had faced a difficult situation with Cbet casino. After winning 5 million Argentine pesos, his withdrawal request had been cancelled, only for him to discover later that his winnings had been converted into USDT and successfully withdrawn without his approval. At that time, his account had been temporarily blocked for investigation. The player insisted he had not requested the cancellation and suspected fraudulent activity. Despite our efforts to mediate, Cbet casino had not responded to our attempts to communicate in the past, forcing us to label this case as 'unresolved', which negatively impacted the casino's overall rating. This had been a common practice for Cbet Casino, which had a history of ignoring our mediation attempts.

The player from Argentina had experienced an account suspension at Cbet casino with his funds frozen. He had made a deposit with a bonus, met the required conditions, and had pending withdrawals totaling 990 USD. Since the casino never responds to complaints, we were forced to close the complaint as 'unresolved'. This affected the casino's overall rating. Unfortunately, this was a common practice for Cbet, which had a history of ignoring complaints. We recommended players to avoid this casino.

The player from Argentina had been unable to withdraw winnings of 30,000 ARS due to receiving a 'This action is Blocked' message. Despite having tried on different devices and browsers, and reaching out to the support team, the issue had remained unresolved. We had attempted to engage with the player to understand the situation better and had extended the response time by 7 days. However, the player did not respond to our inquiries, which led us to reject the complaint due to lack of information.

The player from Belgium was facing difficulties in withdrawing her winnings due to a constant increase in the turnover requirement that the Casino continuously instated, despite already following the initially proposed rule. She sought clarity on the rationale behind this ongoing increase. We requested additional documents from the player to investigate further, but the player failed to respond to our messages within the given time frame. As a result, we were unable to investigate further and had to reject the complaint.

The player from Canada had experienced difficulties withdrawing his funds due to a turnover rule he neither comprehended nor agreed with. Despite his numerous bets that had resulted in a loss, the casino insisted he must wager more before he could withdraw his funds. The Complaints Team had attempted to gather more information about the player's issue, including questions about the bonus he activated, the types of games he played, and his KYC verification status. However, the player failed to respond within the extended time frame, leading to the rejection of his complaint. The team was unable to investigate further due to the lack of response from the player.

The player from Argentina had been experiencing a delay in withdrawal for over a month. Each attempt to contact the casino led to a response that the matter was with the finance department, without further clarification. He confirmed that he had completed the KYC verification but hadn't been able to make any successful withdrawals in the past. The issue was resolved when the player confirmed that he received his withdrawal.

The player from Czech Republic had his account blocked after he tried to withdraw winnings from sports betting. Despite having a verified account and having increased his balance significantly, an anomaly was cited as the reason for the blockage, with no further explanation provided. The player confirmed that his account had been recently registered and verified, and that his winnings were obtained through live betting without the use of any bonuses. However, we were unable to assist due to the issue being related to sports betting, an area outside our then scope of expertise. Consequently, the complaint was rejected.

A player from Argentina reports having difficulties with withdrawal due to unexpected wagering requirements. Despite complying with the stated terms and conditions, the casino added a wager of twice the value of the bonus before withdrawal could be permitted. They suspect the casino of dubious policy implementation. The complaint was closed as unresolved as the casino has no reaction policy.

The player from Argentina had requested a withdrawal three weeks prior but had not received a response from the casino. Despite having made successful withdrawals in the past, passed the KYC verification, and not used a bonus on his account, his current withdrawal request remained unaddressed. We had attempted to mediate the issue with the casino, but due to the casino's history of non-responsiveness, we were forced to close the complaint as 'unresolved'. This negatively impacted the casino's overall rating. Unfortunately, this was a common practice for this particular casino, and we recommended avoiding it in the future.

The player from Argentina had significant issues with a casino. After a win and meeting wager rules, the withdrawal of funds was stalled for days. In addition to the delayed withdrawal, the player's account was blocked due to accusations of fraud, multi-accounting, and multi-IP use, all of which the player denied. They were forced to close the complaint as 'unresolved' due to the casino's lack of reaction, which affected the casino's overall rating. This had been a common practice with this particular casino, and they recommended avoiding it due to its unresponsiveness to complaints. Eventually, it was reported that the casino processed the withdrawal after almost a year, leading to the complaint being marked as 'resolved'.

The player from Argentina had requested a withdrawal more than 2 weeks ago. Unfortunately, he had not received his winnings yet. He had confirmed that he successfully withdrew a large amount before and had passed the KYC verification. No bonus was activated when he accumulated his winnings. Despite our efforts to mediate, the casino did not respond, which led us to close the complaint as 'unresolved'. This was a common practice for this casino, as evidenced by over 15 other cases with the same outcome. We recommended caution when dealing with this casino due to its lack of response to complaints.

The player from Argentina reported that his cbet account had been locked due to alleged 'anomalies'. He was unable to access his account or communicate via chat, leaving a balance of 9000 USDT inaccessible. The Complaints Team attempted to mediate the issue, however, due to the casino's history of non-responsiveness, the complaint was closed as 'unresolved'. This negatively impacted the casino's overall rating.

The player from Argentina had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks before submitting this complaint. The payment hadn't been processed yet. Despite our attempts to mediate, we had to close the complaint as 'unresolved' due to the casino's history of non-responsiveness in over 15 similar cases. This lack of response had negatively impacted the casino's overall rating. Unfortunately, all efforts to communicate with the casino were unsuccessful. We had advised the player to avoid this casino due to its repeated non-cooperation.

The player from Argentina was struggling with increasing withdrawal requirements at CBet. Despite having turned an 8000 ARS deposit into 48000 ARS, the amount needed for withdrawal had increased due to the casino's turnover rules. The player found communication and assistance from the casino's support to be lacking. Despite our team's efforts to contact the casino and mediate the issue, the casino did not respond. Therefore, we marked the complaint as 'unresolved', which could have negatively affected the casino's rating. We advised the player to file a complaint with the gaming authority that regulates the casino - Gaming Curacao.

The player from Canada cannot withdraw $200 CAD from their account as the casino requires them to play $2,005 CAD before enabling withdrawals. The player used two bonuses, both of which they lost and now feels trapped as they cannot retrieve their money, despite having their account verified. The complaint was closed as 'unresolved' as the casino has more than 15 cases marked “No Reaction Policy”.

The player from France had been unable to withdraw his winnings from CBet Casino due to increasing bet requirements. The player, who had had a verified account for several months, had been playing crash game and score bet without using any bonus. However, before the Complaints Team could fully address his issue, the player had lost all his balance. As a result, we had had no other option but to reject the complaint due to the absence of winnings to be withdrawn.

The player from Chile had won 250,000 Chilean pesos at CBet casino, but the website blocked the withdrawal without providing any reason. This issue occurred despite multiple previous successful deposits and withdrawals. The player's last successful withdrawal had been on September 14, 2023, and he had been using bank transfers for transactions. The casino's customer service had asked for a screenshot of the issue, which the player provided, but the problem persisted. Due to the history of unresolved cases and the non-responsiveness of the casino, we had to mark this complaint as unresolved, affecting the casino's overall rating.

The player from Argentina was unable to withdraw her balance of 3500 USDT due to an exceptionally high turnover requirement. This issue persisted even after several interactions with support. He is now unable to access his funds and isn't receiving any response from the casino. It seems to be a common practice of Casino to ignore us completely in our attempts to mediate any kind of issue therefore the complain remains unresolved.

The player from Canada had experienced a delay in receiving her withdrawal of $500 from CBet Casino. Despite several attempts to seek help from the casino's customer service, she had only received $100 credit on CBet, with the remaining $400 still missing. Despite our efforts to mediate the issue by contacting the casino, we had received no response. The complaint had been marked as 'unresolved', which could have potentially affected the casino's rating. We had advised the player to file a complaint with the gaming authority that regulates the casino - Gaming Curacao. However, the complaint was reopened upon the player's request and had eventually been resolved. The player then requested to delete the complaint to avoid creating negative publicity for CBet.

An Argentinian player's account has been blocked after he accumulated $300,000 in winnings and attempted to withdraw $25,000. The casino cited suspicious activity as the reason for blocking the account, but the player claims to have played normally and seeks an explanation and return of his winnings. The complaint was closed as 'unresolved' as the casino has more than 15 cases marked “No Reaction Policy”.

The player from Argentina placed a deposit and won 850,000 Argentine pesos, but his account was banned due to an unspecified 'anomaly' when he tried to withdraw his winnings via Tether (USDT). He had previously withdrawn money successfully. Now, he is seeking a resolution or contact with the casino's legal department. The complaint was closed as unresolved as the casino has no reaction policy.

The player from Chile has had his account blocked by the casino due to reported suspicious activity. Despite attempts to contact the casino, the player has not received any further information or access to his account. Additionally, the player has a pending withdrawal of 30,000 Chilean pesos which has not been processed. The complaint was closed as unresolved as the casino has no reaction policy.

The player from Argentina had faced a withdrawal issue. After depositing 25000Ars and receiving a welcome bonus, the required amount for withdrawal had kept increasing with every slot win, starting from 200,000Ars to 600,000Ars. Despite having contacted customer support, the issue remained unresolved. We had attempted to gather more information from the player to better understand the situation, but received no response. Therefore, the complaint was rejected due to lack of necessary information.

The player from Argentina had their account at Cbet Casino blocked due to alleged cheating with two withdrawals being processed. The player denied any wrongdoing and accused the casino of theft. His account had been fully verified and he had played several games, including 'Sweet Bonanza' and 'Club Tropicana', where he won without using a bonus. After contacting the casino about a delay in his withdrawal, he discovered his account was blocked. Despite our team's efforts to mediate, CBet Casino failed to cooperate or respond, leading to the complaint being closed as 'unresolved', which negatively impacted the casino's rating. We advised the player to contact the Curaçao Gaming Authority for further assistance.

The player from Argentina had hit the max win and initially made successful withdrawals. However, after he deposited 20k and tried to withdraw 23,500 pesos, he encountered issues with his account being blocked and support being non-responsive. He reported that he had registered his account around September 15/16 and had been playing slot machines. Despite his attempts to communicate with the casino, they did not provide any reason for the account block. We had attempted to mediate the issue, inviting the casino to provide evidence and explain the account block, but received no response. We marked the complaint as 'unresolved' due to the lack of cooperation from the casino. We had advised the player to file a complaint with the gaming authority, Gaming Curacao, and offered assistance if needed.

The player from Argentina deposited approximately 300 USDT on CBet.gg and won up to 600,000ARS$. However, upon trying to withdraw, they were told they needed to place bets totaling 1,490,000 ARS$ due to an anti money-laundering rule called 'TurnOver'. The required bet amount, however, inexplicably increased to nearly 2,000,000ARS$ frustrating the player. The complaint was resolved as the player received his payout.

The player from Chile had deposited funds and won, but when he tried to withdraw the winnings, he experienced numerous failed login attempts. Eventually, it was found that the account had been locked without clear reasoning provided by the casino. The player's account had been verified and he had successfully made a previous withdrawal. The casino's customer support had informed the player that his account was banned due to anomalies detected by their security system, but did not provide further details. We had attempted to mediate between the player and the casino, inviting the casino's representative to join the conversation. However, the casino did not respond to the complaint. We had advised the player to file a complaint with the Gaming Curacao Authority, the regulatory body for the casino. The complaint was marked as 'unresolved' due to a lack of cooperation from the casino.

The player from Argentina deposited 90,000 pesos and, after reaching 150,000 pesos, attempted to withdraw his winnings. However, he was informed that he must continue playing up to a certain amount due to concerns about terrorism and money laundering. The complaint was rejected as the player stopped responding.

The player from Argentina had deposited 5,000 Argentine pesos and had doubled it to 10,000 Argentine pesos due to a promotion. After meeting the wagering requirements and accruing 20,000 Argentine pesos in winnings, he had requested a withdrawal on September 24, 2023. However, his account had been suspended and the casino had ceased communication. The player's account had been verified on the day of deposit, but no refund was issued after the suspension. Despite multiple attempts by our team to contact the casino, no response was received. Consequently, we had marked the complaint as 'unresolved', which may have negatively impacted the casino's rating. We had advised the player to file a complaint with the regulating gaming authority, Gaming Curacao, for further assistance.

The player from Chile had his account blocked at Cbet after he made several successful withdrawals. He had a remaining withdrawal of $300,000, which was uncertain due to the closure. The casino had not provided a reason for this action. We attempted to contact the casino multiple times but received no response. Consequently, the issue remained unresolved. We advised the player to file a complaint with the gaming authority that regulates the casino - Gaming Curacao.

The player from Argentina had successfully managed the wagering requirement for withdrawal and built up an account balance of 425,000 ARS, but found their account blocked or erased when they attempted to initiate a withdrawal via Astropay. The player's account had been verified and the winnings were accumulated with real money. The casino had justified the account closure due to the player's 'game strategies' in roulette. We had attempted to mediate the issue, inviting the casino to join the conversation, but received no response. Despite our efforts, the casino had remained uncooperative, leading us to mark the complaint as 'unresolved'. We had advised the player to file a complaint with the gaming authority that regulates the casino - Gaming Curacao.

An Argentinian player's account had been blocked by the casino due to unspecified 'anomalies'. The player had a pending withdrawal and remaining balance in the account. The player was frustrated by the lack of communication from the casino. Despite multiple attempts to contact the casino, we had received no response. As a result, we marked the complaint as 'unresolved', which could have negatively impacted the casino's rating. We had advised the player to file a complaint with the gaming authority that regulates the casino, Gaming Curacao, for further assistance.

The player from Argentina, after having a successful run on the platform, had issues withdrawing his winnings. Despite not using a bonus and wagering three times the amount of their 72,000 ARS deposit, withdrawal was still not possible. The player managed to resolve the issue himself by wagering the amount shown in his account, after which he could withdraw his winnings. We attempted to engage with the casino to understand the situation, but received no response. Due to the lack of cooperation from the casino, we marked the complaint as 'unresolved'. We advised the player to file a complaint with the gaming authority that regulates the casino - Gaming Curacao.

The player from Argentina had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks before submitting this complaint. His money hadn't been received yet. The Complaints Team had advised the player that withdrawal processing could take some time, potentially due to KYC verification or a high volume of withdrawal requests. The team had recommended patience and cooperation with the casino. An extension was given for response but due to the lack of communication from the player, the complaint was rejected. The investigation couldn't have been conducted without the player's input.

The player from Argentina has difficulties withdrawing a significant win. Despite having a verified account, the Astropay withdrawal option no longer appears in the system. The player has contacted support, who claim that Astropay is currently updating. The complaint was resolved as the player received his payout.

A player from Chile faced a delay with his withdrawal of 500,000 Chilean pesos from CBET. While seeking support for this issue, the player unexpectedly found that his account had been blocked, and chat support staff were unable to provide a solution. The complaint was closed as the player stopped responding.

The player from Argentina had had his account blocked by the casino after he won some money, following three deposits. Despite having passed the KYC verification and having provided all necessary documents, the casino had accused him of fraud and had refused to allow him to withdraw his winnings of $40,000 pesos or refund his deposits. The player had claimed that the casino did not provide any evidence of the alleged fraud. We had attempted to investigate the issue, but the player failed to respond to our further inquiries. As a result, the complaint was rejected due to the lack of response from the player.

The player from Argentina had submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings had not been obtained up to that day. The player initially had an issue with a delayed withdrawal, but it was resolved without explanation. A new problem had arisen when the player deposited 280 USD and used a bonus, which he lost immediately. Despite this, the casino's system had required him to bet 1400 USD, an amount significantly higher than his deposit, before he could withdraw his remaining balance of 240 USD. The player had contacted the casino's support team, but received no satisfying solution. The Complaints Team had suggested that the player's issue might have been related to the wagering requirements of the activated bonus. However, the casino did not respond to the team's inquiries, and the complaint was closed as unresolved. The player had been advised to contact the Curaçao Gaming Authority for further assistance.

The player from Argentina was experiencing difficulties with the withdrawal after the casino requested him to wager substantial amounts of money. Despite our efforts to understand the situation and assist him, the player did not respond to our inquiries. As a result, we were unable to further investigate the issue, leading us to reject the complaint.

The player from Argentina had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting his complaint. The payment hadn't been processed at that time. Despite the player's repeated follow-ups, the casino had not transferred his winnings. The Complaints Team had extended the timer by 7 days to allow for further communication. However, due to the player's lack of response, we were unable to proceed with the investigation and had to reject the complaint.

The player from Argentina deposited 5000 ARS into the casino and won, but the withdrawal of the winnings is being denied. The casino is asking the player to wager over 200 thousand ARS before processing the payout.

The player from Argentina has a withdrawal issue on CBet after depositing 5,000 ARS and playing with a bonus. Despite completing all the verification procedures, it requests him to play further (97,522 ARS more) before enabling the withdrawals. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Chile had his casino account blocked after he had placed a deposit, played games, and requested a withdrawal of his winnings. He stated that he had not done anything unusual, except win some money. The player had provided all necessary information and evidence to support his claim. Despite our repeated attempts to contact the casino for clarification and resolution, we received no response. Consequently, we had marked the complaint as 'unresolved', which could have negatively affected the casino's rating. We had advised the player to file a complaint with the gaming authority that regulates the casino - Gaming Curacao.

The player from Argentina had requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, his winnings had not been received yet. Despite our team's attempts to communicate and extend the response time, the player did not respond to our messages or provide further information. As a result, we were unable to investigate the matter further. Consequently, the complaint had been rejected due to lack of player's cooperation.

The player from Argentina has an issue with withdrawal, stating that after receiving a bonus and some winnings, the casino increased their rollover requirement for withdrawal. Despite contacting the support team, they received no assistance in resolving this issue.

The player from Argentina had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting the complaint. His money hadn't been received yet. The Complaints Team had advised patience, as withdrawals could take some time to process, and offered to intervene if the player's account was verified, his game history checked, and his withdrawal approved by the casino, but he still hadn't received his winnings by 14 days since requesting the withdrawal. After some time, the player confirmed he had received his payment, leading us to mark the complaint as resolved.

The player from Chile has submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The player later informed us that she gambled away his balance, and this complaint was rejected.

The player from Argentina had his account blocked after he attempted a withdrawal of 700,000 pesos. The player had played slot machines and roulette over a period of four days. He hadn't utilized any active bonuses and had received no correspondence from the casino regarding the account block. Despite our attempts to mediate the issue with CBet Casino, the casino had not responded. As a result, we had to close the complaint as 'unresolved', which would negatively impact the casino's rating. We had recommended the player to contact the Curacao Gaming Authority for further assistance.

The player from Argentina is unable to withdraw winnings due to a condition requiring him to continue betting. Despite fulfilling the original wagering requirement, the imposed conditions remain, and new ones are enforced. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Ireland signed up, deposited, and played at CBET.GG. Afterward, they discovered that Ireland is listed as a restricted country. Despite the restriction, they were allowed to register, deposit, and play. They are seeking a €500 refund. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

A player from Argentina made four bitcoin withdrawals from the casino platform and each time has noticed that 0.0004 BTC was missing. The player tried contacting the casino, who insisted that the onus is on the player or with the personal wallet the player is using. The casino failed to explain why the fees on the BTC network were significantly less than the amount that goes missing after each transaction. The complaint was closed as the casino has no reaction policy.

The player from Norway had his account blocked by Cbet due to 'suspicious activity regarding play pattern'. He denies any wrongdoing and requests an explanation for the block. His account, which contains a balance of 30,000€, was closed abruptly without refunding over 20,000€ worth of deposits.

The player from Argentina cannot access his account as the casino blocked him without any prior notification. The player stopped responding to our questions and comments, so we had to reject the complaint.

The player from Chile was experiencing difficulties withdrawing his funds and was asked to complete additional wagering. The casino has not responded to the complaint, and it was closed as "unresolved".

After registering from the UK, the player made a deposit and played casually on the site. Initially, the player had no issues with making deposits, however, almost two weeks later, player's usual payment method started to have issues and the casino support said that as the player was from the UK they should close their account and stop playing. The player made a complaint, asking why the casino let register UK players if they were not allowed to play and requested refund of all deposits. Player's account got closed but there was no refund and the casino stopped responding.