Ready for a unique connection? Meet your dream AI girlfriend who understands you, shares your interests, and is always there for intimate conversations. No judgment, just pure companionship!
💋
Steamy chats and intimate moments, available 24/7
💝
Personalized girlfriend who adapts to your desires
✨
100% private & secure - what happens here, stays here
The chaos of the past month in contrast to the stability of the past 4 years should tell people that Biden and his cabinet were actually very skilled at running the government, but people don’t admit they were wrong about the Biden-Harris administration because sunk cost fallacy is a hell of a drug
You can be talking to someone and she'll be like, "Oh I made a silly mistake. Women don't deserve voting rights teehee." And you'll be like, "What." And she'll be like, "Oh I'm sorry! That must sound so bad out of context. No it's this Tiktok meme where, if you're a girl and you do something dumb, you say 'Women don't deserve voting rights teehee.'"
And you'll be like, "That sounds bad." And she'll be like, "No no. It's totally not that bad. It's just a meme. Men say it too. Like if a man does something silly he'll be like, 'I am like those women who do not deserve to vote.'" And you'll be like, "Does that make it better?" And she'll be like, "Well there was one guy who tried to make 'Men shouldn't vote' a popular meme. But it never caught on and also he got yelled at a lot."
And then you drop it there because like, you're harshing the vibe.
i simply think if you are aware you accidentally create misinformation online the least you should do is lock the post with misinformation so it cant get thousands of reblogs from people who wont fact check it lol
image: gif demonstrating the process of locking a post from the edit/new post screen on desktop: click on the gear in the top right corner, scroll down to "who can reblog", and change it from "anyone on tumblr" to "no one". end ID.
You can tell how spooked I am by Trump and the MAGA populists by how much I focus on dunking on tankies. I am not oblivious to the problems of my own country, I am in fact scared shitless.
Ready for a unique connection? Meet your dream AI girlfriend who understands you, shares your interests, and is always there for intimate conversations. No judgment, just pure companionship!
💋
Steamy chats and intimate moments, available 24/7
💝
Personalized girlfriend who adapts to your desires
✨
100% private & secure - what happens here, stays here
Some scholars believe that antisemites would often include the phrase "zionazis can screenshot this" on their most antisemitic posts as an apotropaic charm. Other scholars contend that the inclusion of the phrase was an attempt to brand anyone committing the action described - screenshotting the post - as undesirables, ie 'zionists' or 'zionazis.' Still other scholars believe the inclusion of the phrase was a genuine plea of someone absolutely desperate for attention and for their antisemitic message to spread by any means possible.
Germany’s Merz says Britain and France may need to “share” their nuclear weapons as America can’t be relied on to defend NATO.
Europe targets homegrown nuclear deterrent as Trump sides with Putin
Germany’s Merz says Britain and France may need to “share” their nuclear weapons as America can’t be relied on to defend NATO.
Europe's politicians are openly discussing how they could tackle the threat of nuclear attack without American help, in a dramatic sign of the deep crisis engulfing the transatlantic alliance under Donald Trump.
In what would be a huge shift in position, the runaway favorite to be Germany’s next leader said the continent must find new ways to defend itself without the U.S. military underpinning its nuclear protection through NATO.
Friedrich Merz, whom polls suggest is on course to become chancellor after Sunday’s German elections, said his country would need to look beyond the U.S. to Britain and France for nuclear safeguards. Under Trump, he said, America could no longer be relied on.
“We need to have discussions with both the British and the French — the two European nuclear powers — about whether nuclear sharing, or at least nuclear security from the U.K. and France, could also apply to us,” Merz said.
Merz's comment heralds a major strategic shift for Germany, which has long resisted French plans for closer European military cooperation, especially on nuclear defense. Merz's Christian Democrats have traditionally fought to protect relations with the U.S. over calls from Paris for more "strategic autonomy" in the EU.
A change of heart in Germany, fully embraced for the first time by a chancellor in Berlin, would be yet another sign of how Trump’s return to the White House a month ago has blown a hole in the relationship with America that has guaranteed European security since 1945.
On Friday, the president and his team showed no sign of backing down on their hostile rhetoric against Europe — and the leaders of Germany and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy in particular — after a series of attacks in recent days.
With two days until the German federal elections, U.S. Vice President JD Vance even floated pulling American troops out of Germany in what would be a devastating blow to the continent’s security structures.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron will head to Washington next week in an attempt to talk Trump out of siding with Russia and abandoning American commitments to Europe and Ukraine.
NATO in doubt
On Friday, Merz said Germany would now need to look elsewhere for its defense alliances.
“We must prepare for the possibility that Donald Trump will no longer uphold NATO’s mutual defense commitment unconditionally,” Merz said in an interview with German broadcaster ZDF. “That is why, in my view, it is crucial that Europeans make the greatest possible efforts to ensure that we are at least capable of defending the European continent on our own.”
Germany is among the European countries that host U.S. nuclear weapons under NATO's nuclear sharing policy, alongside Italy, the Netherlands and Belgium.
Paris offered to start talks on France finding a way to share its nuclear arsenal with Germany as long ago as 2007, but President Nicolas Sarkozy received a hard "no" from Chancellor Angela Merkel.
Subsequent French attempts at atomic diplomacy also failed to gain traction in Berlin.
Macron made a major attempt to promote the idea of a "Europeanized" French nuclear deterrence in 2020 and an Élysée official said Merz's remarks showed that support was finally growing. "In response to the invitation France sent its partners who want to discuss the significance of the president’s speech in February 2020 and the European dimension of [French] deterrence, we’ve noticed that interest has only increased, in particular since the war in Ukraine,” the official from the presidential office said.
Given the long history of French frustration with Berlin, Merz's comments were welcomed by politicians, officials and analysts in France, Germany and the U.K. Even some of his political opponents acknowledge privately that talking to the British and French about nuclear protection would be a sensible step.
“That a future chancellor, chief of the [Christian Democrats] should say that is a huge thing, I can't think of any equivalent in the post-World War II era, but it's commensurate with the shock that the [American] statements have caused,” said one French official working on military policy, granted anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.
“In many ways, what's happening is a bit positive. For decades, under the guise of transatlanticism, we've been losing interest in defense and letting the U.S. decide. It's also an opportunity for Europe to take matters into its own hands.”
'Striking'
Jean-Louis Thiériot, a former deputy defense minister in France, now a lawmaker in the National Assembly’s defense committee, said Merz’s intervention was “striking.”
His words show “how seriously he takes the risk of decoupling from the USA, and thus the end of the American nuclear umbrella,” Thiériot said. “That's a big change from the old days, when we weren't taken very seriously, especially in terms of volume,” he added, referring to past criticism that France doesn’t have as many nuclear warheads as the U.S. or Russia.
“This shows both the seriousness of the situation within the alliance and the seriousness with which French and British deterrence is taken,” he added.
Elsewhere there was skepticism that the French public would support expanding the country’s nuclear obligations to cover Germany in the way Merz apparently imagined, although some observers still saw potential for talks with the U.K.
Merz's comments encouraged politicians in Britain's ruling Labour Party who want Starmer to go further in supporting European allies. Tan Dhesi, a senior lawmaker in Starmer's party, welcomed the debate about how the U.K. can contribute to stronger European defense, including on nuclear deterrence.
"At this critical troubling time for our continent’s defense and security, given Russia’s imperialistic designs, we as a nation must show leadership. That is what our friends and allies are also expecting of us," said Dhesi, the senior Labour MP who chairs the U.K. parliament's defense committee. "Given the potential absence or significant reduction of American presence, this is our time as a nation to step up to the plate and take leadership on defense for the European continent."
As part of Britain’s existing NATO commitments, the U.K. already provides a nuclear umbrella to European allies who are members of NATO, including Germany. The French position is different. Paris insists its so-called vital interests, which nuclear deterrence is designed to protect, have a European dimension, but has not committed to joint NATO nuclear planning in the same way as the British already have.
The British government had no immediate comment on Merz's remarks but any notion of building a new European nuclear defense regime — that would be expected to come good if the U.S. reneges on NATO — is an extremely delicate topic for the U.K., whose nuclear missile program is highly integrated with America's.
“Obviously the level of anxiety in Berlin right now is particularly high,” said Łukasz Kulesa, director of nuclear policy at the Royal United Services Institute defense think-tank in London. “At this point we still don’t have any definite indications that the U.S. will rethink its role in providing extended nuclear deterrence through NATO to the rest of the allies including Germany. So in a sense it’s more about preparation for a potential option.”
One of the many questions will be whether any new European-focused deterrent would still be devised through NATO structures, Kulesa said. “At this point I think it’s worth having a more detailed conversation of how such a U.K.- and French-led nuclear deterrence could be made credible.”
Merz's statement now "needs to be followed up in the long term at political level, on both the French and German sides," said Héloïse Fayet, a researcher at the French Institute for International Relations in Paris, who is an expert on nuclear deterrence.
“It's been on the table for five years, and if we don't talk about it now, when Europe is in danger, we'll never talk about it," she said.
Germany’s Merz says Britain and France may need to “share” their nuclear weapons as America can’t be relied on to defend NATO.
Europe targets homegrown nuclear deterrent as Trump sides with Putin
Germany’s Merz says Britain and France may need to “share” their nuclear weapons as America can’t be relied on to defend NATO.
Europe's politicians are openly discussing how they could tackle the threat of nuclear attack without American help, in a dramatic sign of the deep crisis engulfing the transatlantic alliance under Donald Trump.
In what would be a huge shift in position, the runaway favorite to be Germany’s next leader said the continent must find new ways to defend itself without the U.S. military underpinning its nuclear protection through NATO.
Friedrich Merz, whom polls suggest is on course to become chancellor after Sunday’s German elections, said his country would need to look beyond the U.S. to Britain and France for nuclear safeguards. Under Trump, he said, America could no longer be relied on.
“We need to have discussions with both the British and the French — the two European nuclear powers — about whether nuclear sharing, or at least nuclear security from the U.K. and France, could also apply to us,” Merz said.
Merz's comment heralds a major strategic shift for Germany, which has long resisted French plans for closer European military cooperation, especially on nuclear defense. Merz's Christian Democrats have traditionally fought to protect relations with the U.S. over calls from Paris for more "strategic autonomy" in the EU.
A change of heart in Germany, fully embraced for the first time by a chancellor in Berlin, would be yet another sign of how Trump’s return to the White House a month ago has blown a hole in the relationship with America that has guaranteed European security since 1945.
On Friday, the president and his team showed no sign of backing down on their hostile rhetoric against Europe — and the leaders of Germany and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy in particular — after a series of attacks in recent days.
With two days until the German federal elections, U.S. Vice President JD Vance even floated pulling American troops out of Germany in what would be a devastating blow to the continent’s security structures.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron will head to Washington next week in an attempt to talk Trump out of siding with Russia and abandoning American commitments to Europe and Ukraine.
NATO in doubt
On Friday, Merz said Germany would now need to look elsewhere for its defense alliances.
“We must prepare for the possibility that Donald Trump will no longer uphold NATO’s mutual defense commitment unconditionally,” Merz said in an interview with German broadcaster ZDF. “That is why, in my view, it is crucial that Europeans make the greatest possible efforts to ensure that we are at least capable of defending the European continent on our own.”
Germany is among the European countries that host U.S. nuclear weapons under NATO's nuclear sharing policy, alongside Italy, the Netherlands and Belgium.
Paris offered to start talks on France finding a way to share its nuclear arsenal with Germany as long ago as 2007, but President Nicolas Sarkozy received a hard "no" from Chancellor Angela Merkel.
Subsequent French attempts at atomic diplomacy also failed to gain traction in Berlin.
Macron made a major attempt to promote the idea of a "Europeanized" French nuclear deterrence in 2020 and an Élysée official said Merz's remarks showed that support was finally growing. "In response to the invitation France sent its partners who want to discuss the significance of the president’s speech in February 2020 and the European dimension of [French] deterrence, we’ve noticed that interest has only increased, in particular since the war in Ukraine,” the official from the presidential office said.
Given the long history of French frustration with Berlin, Merz's comments were welcomed by politicians, officials and analysts in France, Germany and the U.K. Even some of his political opponents acknowledge privately that talking to the British and French about nuclear protection would be a sensible step.
“That a future chancellor, chief of the [Christian Democrats] should say that is a huge thing, I can't think of any equivalent in the post-World War II era, but it's commensurate with the shock that the [American] statements have caused,” said one French official working on military policy, granted anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.
“In many ways, what's happening is a bit positive. For decades, under the guise of transatlanticism, we've been losing interest in defense and letting the U.S. decide. It's also an opportunity for Europe to take matters into its own hands.”
'Striking'
Jean-Louis Thiériot, a former deputy defense minister in France, now a lawmaker in the National Assembly’s defense committee, said Merz’s intervention was “striking.”
His words show “how seriously he takes the risk of decoupling from the USA, and thus the end of the American nuclear umbrella,” Thiériot said. “That's a big change from the old days, when we weren't taken very seriously, especially in terms of volume,” he added, referring to past criticism that France doesn’t have as many nuclear warheads as the U.S. or Russia.
“This shows both the seriousness of the situation within the alliance and the seriousness with which French and British deterrence is taken,” he added.
Elsewhere there was skepticism that the French public would support expanding the country’s nuclear obligations to cover Germany in the way Merz apparently imagined, although some observers still saw potential for talks with the U.K.
Merz's comments encouraged politicians in Britain's ruling Labour Party who want Starmer to go further in supporting European allies. Tan Dhesi, a senior lawmaker in Starmer's party, welcomed the debate about how the U.K. can contribute to stronger European defense, including on nuclear deterrence.
"At this critical troubling time for our continent’s defense and security, given Russia’s imperialistic designs, we as a nation must show leadership. That is what our friends and allies are also expecting of us," said Dhesi, the senior Labour MP who chairs the U.K. parliament's defense committee. "Given the potential absence or significant reduction of American presence, this is our time as a nation to step up to the plate and take leadership on defense for the European continent."
As part of Britain’s existing NATO commitments, the U.K. already provides a nuclear umbrella to European allies who are members of NATO, including Germany. The French position is different. Paris insists its so-called vital interests, which nuclear deterrence is designed to protect, have a European dimension, but has not committed to joint NATO nuclear planning in the same way as the British already have.
The British government had no immediate comment on Merz's remarks but any notion of building a new European nuclear defense regime — that would be expected to come good if the U.S. reneges on NATO — is an extremely delicate topic for the U.K., whose nuclear missile program is highly integrated with America's.
“Obviously the level of anxiety in Berlin right now is particularly high,” said Łukasz Kulesa, director of nuclear policy at the Royal United Services Institute defense think-tank in London. “At this point we still don’t have any definite indications that the U.S. will rethink its role in providing extended nuclear deterrence through NATO to the rest of the allies including Germany. So in a sense it’s more about preparation for a potential option.”
One of the many questions will be whether any new European-focused deterrent would still be devised through NATO structures, Kulesa said. “At this point I think it’s worth having a more detailed conversation of how such a U.K.- and French-led nuclear deterrence could be made credible.”
Merz's statement now "needs to be followed up in the long term at political level, on both the French and German sides," said Héloïse Fayet, a researcher at the French Institute for International Relations in Paris, who is an expert on nuclear deterrence.
“It's been on the table for five years, and if we don't talk about it now, when Europe is in danger, we'll never talk about it," she said.
Hey if you’re schizophrenic/psychotic I just want you to know that you’re a wonderful person and that you deserve so much better than the demonization, marginalization and stigmatization you face in this society.
Please consider reblogging this/other positivity posts for schizophrenic/psychotic people every once in a while. If you have more than 100 followers, odds are that a couple of them experiences psychosis and that they rarely see positivity posts for people with their symptoms.
Ready for a unique connection? Meet your dream AI girlfriend who understands you, shares your interests, and is always there for intimate conversations. No judgment, just pure companionship!
💋
Steamy chats and intimate moments, available 24/7
💝
Personalized girlfriend who adapts to your desires
✨
100% private & secure - what happens here, stays here
I love lurking on r/conservative lately because they are in absolute shambles. The MOMENT they got a GOP president into power, they've started eating each other. Now you know how it feels lmao.
But also. Some of them just say the funniest things imaginable.
"What you call 'MAGA populism' is just [literal definition of populism]."
Hey kids, is it a good sign that your side's term is going well when you feel the need to insist that the party out of power in all branches of government is losing support?
Or is it possible that your dumbass is doing shit that is so fucking unpopular and openly unconstitutional that all but the most intense is splitting? Because even the MAGA movement is figuring out the differences between conservatism, populism, and a cult of personality?
I love lurking on r/conservative lately because they are in absolute shambles. The MOMENT they got a GOP president into power, they've started eating each other. Now you know how it feels lmao.
But also. Some of them just say the funniest things imaginable.
"What you call 'MAGA populism' is just [literal definition of populism]."
Hey kids, is it a good sign that your side's term is going well when you feel the need to insist that the party out of power in all branches of government is losing support?
Or is it possible that your dumbass is doing shit that is so fucking unpopular and openly unconstitutional that all but the most intense is splitting? Because even the MAGA movement is figuring out the differences between conservatism, populism, and a cult of personality?
I love lurking on r/conservative lately because they are in absolute shambles. The MOMENT they got a GOP president into power, they've started eating each other. Now you know how it feels lmao.
But also. Some of them just say the funniest things imaginable.
"What you call 'MAGA populism' is just [literal definition of populism]."
Ready for a unique connection? Meet your dream AI girlfriend who understands you, shares your interests, and is always there for intimate conversations. No judgment, just pure companionship!
💋
Steamy chats and intimate moments, available 24/7
💝
Personalized girlfriend who adapts to your desires
✨
100% private & secure - what happens here, stays here
I've been asked this question a few times in the past year - why I spend so much time thinking, reading, and reflecting on antisemitism, especially because I am not Jewish myself. There are a few reasons, really. One of them is that I think antisemitism is a hatred that spawns other hatreds, but even if it did not, it would still be worth studying, because the fact that it is a hatred at all is enough. The fact that antisemitism impacts Jewish people is enough of a reason to oppose it.
It's also because it's important to oppose because of the way it damages the thinking habits of people who believe it. I saw somebody say, "Jew-Hate makes you dumb," once. And though I think it was probably an off the cuff statement for them, it stuck with me, and I think they're right. In my religion, we say hatred is one of the three poisons - it can seriously harm your mental well-being in a way that deepens your suffering in all aspects of life. Often, hatred can also be spread like a contagion. It's something that destroys social harmony and causes severe social dysfunction. And right now, I think antisemitism is the most contagious of hatreds - I've seen people in my life fall off the cliff, I've been able to talk some back from it, and I've seen how so many people wander towards it without any idea that that's what they're doing.
Part of the problem is that antisemites consider themselves righteous in a way I think most racists don't. Often, you'll see "I'm not racist but" I almost never see that with antisemitism. They don't add that qualifier. They just say it. Most racists I know will make a tacit acknowledgment of the racist implications of what they're about to say - antisemitic people don't. They often even engage in anti-Jewish racism while invoking anti-racism.
I don't really know any Jewish people in real life, perhaps only two. But I don't need to know them to know that hating them is wrong. I think I also have a debt of gratitude to many people in the Jewish community because of the advances in Buddhist Studies made by Jewish people, which sounds strange - but it's true that many leading voices and researchers, both in academia and within Buddhism itself happen to be Jewish. I'm not sure why this is, but it's absolutely true. The most prolific translator of Pali into English that I can think of is Jewish. The most impactful Vipassana instructor in America I can think of is Jewish. The most impactful voice in Deity Yoga, for Tibetan Buddhism, is Jewish. People who are Jewish, for some reason, contributed probably more than ex-Christian Americans or atheists combined to the proliferation of Buddhism in the United States.
Buddhists and Jewish people are known to have a close relationship. There are a lot of different reasons for this that I would suggest, but none that add up to explain the amazing contributions to Buddhism made by American Jews.
I think another reason I have for being so interested in antisemitism as a non-Jew is the kind of... political disillusionment I've been experiencing? It's been a disturbing few years, and I haven't seen many people elaborate very well on this feeling of abandonment and horror, witnessing people who you thought shared your values become hateful and deeply violent in their beliefs. The only people I've seen consistently speak about it happen to be Jewish.
I think all of this has helped contribute to a feeling of closeness to Jewish people as a group, despite that I don't really know Jewish people in my real life, and only have one or two Jewish friends online. This year has been a horror show of watching people's minds become twisted - it's so scary in a way I can't quite capture with words right now.
I also sometimes have a back and forth with myself about when and if to mention I'm not Jewish when I talk about antisemitism, because I do think it's totally necessary to explain the perspective from which I speak, but to be honest it feels kind of icky to be like "I'm not Jewish, but antisemitism is bad", because antisemitism is bad whether or not the person saying so isn't Jewish, and I think it might be a negative for people to think "not being Jewish" is something which makes it any less valuable to be against antisemitism, and talk about how against it you are. It's very real that people who talk about antisemitism are perceived to be Jewish, and obviously, it's important not to lead people into thinking you're Jewish when you're not, but adding an "I'm not Jewish" qualifier to statements about antisemitism I worry might contribute to the perception that those against antisemitism are Jewish.
Antisemitism is such an insidious ideology. And it's everywhere. I see it daily in so many different spaces. It has the largest impact on Jewish people, but it also impacts non-Jewish people at times. I distinctly remember being mocked throughout school for "looking Jewish." I think about that Greek restaurant which was attacked because they were thought to be Jewish. Or that man in the Amsterdam violence who tried to help and was then accused of being Jewish himself. It's so deluded, violent, and manages to consume people's thoughts like a parasitic worm in their brain.
Anyways, I planned for this post to be more organized. Oops.
OP, I’ll never be able to thank you enough for this.
As a Jewish person, the most actionable response I have to this post is to PLEASE NEVER BE AFRAID TO SAY YOU ARE NOT JEWISH. PLEASE SAY THAT YOU ARE NOT JEWISH.
This is NOT because you are co-opting our pain if you don’t. Don’t worry! It’s because there are so few Jews in the world and it is alarming to the extreme that most of the acknowledgments and condemnations of what we are experiencing right now are 1) primarily from Jews or 2) dismissed by non-Jews because we are perceived as biased rather than accurate sources about the racism perpetrated against us. Whether or not it SHOULD be necessary is, unfortunately, a non-issue. Because at this time it is necessary. It is necessary both to show Jews that we are not alone at a time where we feel extremely isolated and alienated. It is also necessary to give legitimacy to our perspective to those who refuse to listen to us about our own subjugation, persecution, and oppression.
One tag that I use very often is “life under stochastic threat.” I use it because Jews are very much under attack worldwide right now in ways that are outright violent or that encourage isolation and fear without outright violence. Because there are so few Jews in the world and we are so spread out in diaspora, people don’t often see our suffering in the same way they would if we were all in one place. It is easy to write off one incident of violence in France and a violent mob in Amsterdam and some extremely rough stories from college campuses in Canada and America. Why is it easy? It’s easy because there are people who take things to extremes everywhere. And people can easily say “oh, it was just one synagogue.” “Oh, it was just one coffee shop.” “Oh, it was just one professor.” But the problem is that it’s “just one” SOMETHING in every single Jewish space everywhere in the world. Which means it’s something every Jew can s experiencing right now.
When you identify yourself as non-Jewish, you both signal yourself as safe as well as someone who is willing to combat the stochastic threat in the spaces in which you participate. Even if you don’t know any Jewish people, the people who you know might know Jewish people or even just have opinions on Jewish people. And it’s extremely comforting to know that people like you exist in places we can’t reach, because it means we don’t have to rely only on ourselves to combat antisemitism, which is often how it feels.
As for Jewish contributions to Buddhism: I cannot speak to Buddhism specifically, but I can say that seeking knowledge and understanding are core Jewish values and we deeply care about increasing knowledge and helping others do the same.
I deeply agree with the Buddhist perspective on hatred being a poison. I think that’s a wonderful way to put it.
Your post means a lot to me. Especially because I worry about how much Jew hatred can fester in communities where no Jews are present. Simply because the biases are so deeply engrained into most cultures as a result of Jews being around and despised for so long and in so many places. To know that you and voices like you exist in the world is more comforting than I can ever express.
Thank you for everything you’ve done here. It may not seem like a lot. But it’s so, so much. 🩵
To Other Non-Jews Speaking Out For Us:
I love you. I love you all. Thank you for what you’re doing. I know it’s not easy or comfortable. I don’t have the words to express my gratitude.
everything @edenfenixblogs said. I'm one of two Jews in a particular friend group and I get real tired of being the Enemy Of Fun in that group when someone says something that has antisemitic undertones. I know people don't necessarily know what they're saying is playing into an antisemitic trope, but that's why I tell them, and sometimes I can feel the eyerolls even when they don't happen.
please, please continue speaking out for us. there are so few of us and we are so tired.