Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Week 3 THEORIES OF SOCIOLOGY

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

THEORIES OF

SOCIOLOGY
The Structural-Functionalist Theory/functionalism

The theory tries to explain how the relationships among the parts of society are created
and they inter relate(functional and dysfunctional)

The structural-functionalist theory sees society as a complex system whose parts work
together to promote solidarity and stability

It focuses on consensus, social order, structure and function in society

If all does not go well, the parts of society then must adapt to recapture a new order,
stability, and productivity
NEGATIVE CRITIQUE
This theory was challenged by its main critics, notably those who proposed the
social –conflict theory and symbolic internationalism

The theory was challenged for its emphasis on stability and order while
neglecting conflict and changes which so vital in any society.

Critics also claim that the perspective justifies the status quo and complacency o
the part of society's members.

It sees society in very broad terms, neglecting micro-level


Functionalism does not encourage people to take an active
role in changing their social environment, even when such
change may benefit them.

Instead, functionalism sees active social change as


undesirable because the various parts of society will
compensate naturally for any problems that may arise.
The Social Conflict Theory
This theory is also called Marxism; to indicate that the main idea to the theory
derives from the writings of Karl Marx

This theory sees society in a framework of class conflicts and focuses on the
struggle for scarce resources by different groups in a given society

 Factors such as race, sex, class, and age are linked to social inequality.

It asks such questions as what pulls society apart. How does society change?

.
The theory holds that the most important aspect of social order
is the domination of some group by others, that actual or
potential conflicts

The theory is useful in explaining how the dominant groups use


their power to exploit the less powerful
groups in society
It centered on alienation; which refers to the condition in which the
individual is isolated and divorced from his or her society, work, or the
sense of self.

Marx defined four specific types of alienation.

 Alienation from the product of one’s labor

 Alienation from the process of one’s labor

 Alienation from others

 Alienation from one’s self


NEGATIVE CRITIQUE
Although this theory gained fame in recent decades, it came
under sharp criticism, for its overemphasis on inequality and
division

It neglected the fact of how shared values and interdependence


generate unity among members of society

It is also criticized for its explicit political goals.

It sees society in very broad terms, neglecting micro-level


Symbolic Interactionism
This theory was advanced by such American sociologists as Charles
Horton Cooley (1864-1929)

This perspective views symbols as the basis of social life.

Symbols are things to which we attach meanings. The theory stresses the
analysis of how our behaviours depend on how we define others and
ourselves.

It concentrates on process, rather than structure, and keeps the individual


actor at the centre.

In short, this theory calls attention to the detailed, person-oriented


processes that take place within the larger units of social life
Other contemporary sociological theories:
Feminism
This theory takes as its central theme the place and facts of women’s
underprivileged status and their exploitation in a patriarchally dominated
society.

Feminist sociology focuses on the particular disadvantages, including


oppression and exploitation faced by women in society

Rational Choice Theory: This theory assumes that individuals will operate in
rational way and will seek to benefit themselves in the life choices they make.

Social Exchange Theory


This theory focuses on “the costs and benefits which people obtain in social
interaction, including money, goods, and status.

It is based on the principle that people always act to maximize benefit But to
receive benefits, there must always be an exchange
Public Choice Theory: This theory states that collective organizations such as
political parties act rationally to maximize their own benefits.

It argues that individual differences are best resolved by collective


involvement within organizations.

Structuralism
This theory denies any basis for humans being active, since human
consciousness is no longer seen as the basis of meaning in language.

This was a  systematic movement founded in Germany by Wilhelm


Wundt and mainly identified with  Edward B. Titchener.

Structuralism sought to analyze the adult mind (defined as the sum total of


experience from birth to the present) in terms of the simplest definable
components and then to find the way in which these components fit together
in complex forms.
Structuralism differs from the mainstream traditional theories in
that it rejects objective social facts and a concept of society as an
objective, external entity.

Its basic principle is that the observable is meaningful only in so far as


it can be related to an underlying structure or order

The problem with this theory is that they view societies as static and do
not help very much in explaining variation among societies. The theory
treats culture as a given order and fails to explain the adaptive
dimensions of culture
Post-Structuralism and Post-modernism:

Post –structuralism: focuses on the power of language in


constructing knowledge and identity. The writers in this
field have emphasized the role of language in human life,
how language dictates the thoughts we have, and how it
constructs meanings for us.
Post-Structuralism and Post-modernism:

Post-modernism: The basis of post-modernism was post-


structuralism. Post-modernism is defined as a cultural and
aesthetic phenomenon which mainly rejects order and progress,
objective and universal truth; and supports the need for
recognizing and tolerating different forms of reality.

It tends to celebrate chaos and disorder, diversity and


fragmentation in the modern global society rather than wanting to
achieve order. This theory maintains that there is no ultimate
reason in human life and existence

Postmodernists argue, “Power has become decentralized and


fragmented in contemporary societies“
END

You might also like