Week 3 THEORIES OF SOCIOLOGY
Week 3 THEORIES OF SOCIOLOGY
Week 3 THEORIES OF SOCIOLOGY
SOCIOLOGY
The Structural-Functionalist Theory/functionalism
The theory tries to explain how the relationships among the parts of society are created
and they inter relate(functional and dysfunctional)
The structural-functionalist theory sees society as a complex system whose parts work
together to promote solidarity and stability
If all does not go well, the parts of society then must adapt to recapture a new order,
stability, and productivity
NEGATIVE CRITIQUE
This theory was challenged by its main critics, notably those who proposed the
social –conflict theory and symbolic internationalism
The theory was challenged for its emphasis on stability and order while
neglecting conflict and changes which so vital in any society.
Critics also claim that the perspective justifies the status quo and complacency o
the part of society's members.
This theory sees society in a framework of class conflicts and focuses on the
struggle for scarce resources by different groups in a given society
Factors such as race, sex, class, and age are linked to social inequality.
It asks such questions as what pulls society apart. How does society change?
.
The theory holds that the most important aspect of social order
is the domination of some group by others, that actual or
potential conflicts
Symbols are things to which we attach meanings. The theory stresses the
analysis of how our behaviours depend on how we define others and
ourselves.
Rational Choice Theory: This theory assumes that individuals will operate in
rational way and will seek to benefit themselves in the life choices they make.
It is based on the principle that people always act to maximize benefit But to
receive benefits, there must always be an exchange
Public Choice Theory: This theory states that collective organizations such as
political parties act rationally to maximize their own benefits.
Structuralism
This theory denies any basis for humans being active, since human
consciousness is no longer seen as the basis of meaning in language.
The problem with this theory is that they view societies as static and do
not help very much in explaining variation among societies. The theory
treats culture as a given order and fails to explain the adaptive
dimensions of culture
Post-Structuralism and Post-modernism: