LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE, DEPUTY CHEIF, OFFICE OF SUPERVISION SERVICES OF LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE SERVICES August 7, 2017
LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE, DEPUTY CHEIF, OFFICE OF SUPERVISION SERVICES OF LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE SERVICES August 7, 2017
LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE, DEPUTY CHEIF, OFFICE OF SUPERVISION SERVICES OF LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE SERVICES August 7, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-327-1566
AUGUST 7, 2017
Again, it is with regret that I must correct you, your staff, regarding the
attempted EXTORTION OF MY MONIES. I HAD MANY ISSUES WITH YOUR OFFICE OVER
THE YEARS FOR SIMILAR EXTORTION TACTICS. The following is from my letter to Ms.
Pfurisch, CLERK OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS of August 7,
2017:
Ms. Pfurisch, this is the second NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT that
your office refused to send up to the SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. I filed this
NOTICE OF APPEAL on June 26, 2017. Last OCTOBER I sent you another NOTICE OF
APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT complete with a $75.00 MONEY ORDER and In Forma
Pauperis Application for CASE NO. Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016. I NEVER
RECIEVED ANY CORRESPONDENCE FROM YOUR OFFICE OR FROM SUPERIOR COURT.
YOU JUST FLAT OUT EXTORTED THE $75.00 MONEY ORDER AND OBSTRUCTED MY RIGHT
TO APPEAL - TWICE!
Hempfield Township v. Hapchuck 153 Pa. Comwlth. 173620 A. 2d. 668 (1993) Pro
Se Brief failed to comply with Pa. Rules of Appellate Procedure, but the failure to
comply did not substantially impede the Courts ability to review the issues
presented and therefore considered the merits of the case.
Pa. R. App. P. Rule 552, 561 Indigent 16.2 In Forma Pauperis, Griffen v. Illinois,
351 U.S. 12, 76 S. Ct. 585, 100 L. Ed. 891 (1956) states Indigent has right to free
Trial Transcript for Appeal of Right.
In Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District, the courts interpreted due
process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due process means.
Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F 2d.
644) have concluded the following: Even the probability of unfairness can result in
a defendant being deprived of his due process rights.
The first issue to address is that of the Plaintiffs right to due process, as
prescribed by law. In Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District, the
courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what
due process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v.
Coyler (1978, 524 F 2d. 644) have concluded the following: Even the probability of
unfairness can result in a defendant being deprived of his due process rights.
CIVIL RIGHTS
1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying
purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of
constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of
serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for
purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local
government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const.
Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed.
Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
CIVIL CONSPIRACY
Rico 263 42 1985 (2) Persons Involved In Litigation To Be Free From
Conspiracy In the case of United States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal
responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the following:
In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under
Pennsylvania Law, a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree
orcombine with lawful intent to do an unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act
by unlawful means, with proof of malice with intent to injure the person, his/her
property and or business. In the case of United States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d.
338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the following:
Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in
an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core
conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which involves
different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan.
1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying
purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of
constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of
serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for
purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local
government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const.
Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed.
Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Respectfully,
_______________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-327-1566
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud
within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the
truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public
corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications
are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County
and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture
from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTS
DOCUMENT DIVIDER
NOTICE: The Judicial Conduct Board has no authority to change a Judges decisions or rulings. Our jurisdiction extends only to
conduct that violates the Code of Judicial Conduct or the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges, which
may be found at our website at www.jcbpa.org.
Your Information:
Name: Stan J. Caterbone
Case Information: (If misconduct allegations relate to Court Proceedings.) Case Has Been Appealed
I certify that I have read the information concerning the Judicial Conduct Boards function, jurisdiction, and
procedures included in the accompanying brochure. I further swear (or affirm) that the above information is true
and accurate. The statements in this complaint are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. 4904 (relating
to unsworn falsification to authorities).
Please use this page to explain your complaint, providing as much detail as possible.
Attach additional pages if needed.
Please note, it is not required that you present your grievance to the Board in person. Personal interviews are not required and are
not usually necessary for our preliminary review, investigation, and understanding of grievances. If we need further information
relative to your grievances, you will be contacted by phone or letter and arrangements will be made for an interview if deemed
necessary.
1. On October 28, 2016 I, Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, mailed a NOTICE OF APEAL TO SUPERIOR
COURT via USPS Priority Mail Tracking No. 9405 5036 9930 0417 6700 86 to the CLERK OF
COURT of LANCASTER COUNTY. The tracking delivery confirmation reads Your item has been
delivered and is available at a PO Box at 8:28 am on October 31, 2016 in LANCASTER,
PA 17608. In it contained the NOTICE, an In Forma Pauperis Application, and a Money
Order for $75.00 from PNC Bank on Duke Street, across the street from the Lancaster
County Courthouse, No. 00677971.
2. On December 7, 2016 I, Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se did an audit of Pennsylvania MDA Superior
Court cases and found no docket number for the filed appeal. A call was made to the
Prothonotary at Superior Court and the clerk also did an audit and confirmed there was no docket
number for the filed appeal.
3. On December 8 and December 9 I, Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, made repeated calls to the
Lancaster County Clerk of Court with no answer. I also requested the clerk at Superior Court to
inquirer, however they instructed me to make the calls.
4. This is not an isolated case, as you are aware. I have had many problems in the past with the
Clerk of Courts, in fact Ryan Aument, former Clerk of Courts, had to enlist the services of Mr.
Frankhouser, Attorney from Underhill and Brubaker, to defend against similar complaints. You
have copies of the correspondence in other case numbers.
5. This act amounts to extortion and theft by deception of the $75.00 of real monies.
6. This act amounts to a Civil Rights Violation of Obstruction of Justice for not granting me my
Constitutional Right To Appeal.
7. SEE THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR YOUR REVIEW.
Revised: 06/01/2009
JUDICIALTO
LETTER CONDUCT
BRETT I. BOARD
COLE COMPLAINT Page
Page
No.2 11
of 37
of 59 Friday
MondayDecember
August 9,
7, 2016
2017
Appellate Courts Docket Sheets https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/Appellate.aspx
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which
can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act (18 Pa.C.S. Section 9101 et seq.) may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
The webpage you are viewing is operated and maintained by Pennsylvania's Unified Judicial System as a source of public information. The webpage
is not affiliated with any search system for public records provided by private organizations for which fees may be incurred. The ability to search for
and review information contained in these web docket sheets is a free public service.
Select a Docket Sheet Search Type from the dropdown (default search type is by Docket Number)
Search Type:
Enter the desired search criteria and click Search (available search criteria changes based upon the type selected above)
* Court Name:
and any combination of
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Attorney First Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed: through
JUDICIALTO
LETTER CONDUCT
BRETT I. BOARD
COLE COMPLAINT Page
Page
No.3 12
of 37
of 59 Friday
MondayDecember
August 9,
7, 2016
2017
1 of 1 12/7/2016 5:15 AM
Appellate Courts Docket Sheets https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/Appellate.aspx
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which
can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act (18 Pa.C.S. Section 9101 et seq.) may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
The webpage you are viewing is operated and maintained by Pennsylvania's Unified Judicial System as a source of public information. The webpage
is not affiliated with any search system for public records provided by private organizations for which fees may be incurred. The ability to search for
and review information contained in these web docket sheets is a free public service.
Select a Docket Sheet Search Type from the dropdown (default search type is by Docket Number)
Search Type:
Enter the desired search criteria and click Search (available search criteria changes based upon the type selected above)
* Court Name:
and any combination of
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Attorney First Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed: through
No Records Found
JUDICIALTO
LETTER CONDUCT
BRETT I. BOARD
COLE COMPLAINT Page
Page
No.4 13
of 37
of 59 Friday
MondayDecember
August 9,
7, 2016
2017
1 of 1 12/7/2016 5:16 AM
Appellate Courts Docket Sheets https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/Appellate.aspx
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which
can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act (18 Pa.C.S. Section 9101 et seq.) may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
The webpage you are viewing is operated and maintained by Pennsylvania's Unified Judicial System as a source of public information. The webpage
is not affiliated with any search system for public records provided by private organizations for which fees may be incurred. The ability to search for
and review information contained in these web docket sheets is a free public service.
Select a Docket Sheet Search Type from the dropdown (default search type is by Docket Number)
Search Type:
Enter the desired search criteria and click Search (available search criteria changes based upon the type selected above)
* Court Name:
and any combination of
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Attorney First Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed: through
JUDICIALTO
LETTER CONDUCT
BRETT I. BOARD
COLE COMPLAINT Page
Page
No.5 14
of 37
of 59 Friday
MondayDecember
August 9,
7, 2016
2017
1 of 1 12/7/2016 5:17 AM
Appellate Courts Docket Sheets https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/Appellate.aspx
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which
can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act (18 Pa.C.S. Section 9101 et seq.) may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
The webpage you are viewing is operated and maintained by Pennsylvania's Unified Judicial System as a source of public information. The webpage
is not affiliated with any search system for public records provided by private organizations for which fees may be incurred. The ability to search for
and review information contained in these web docket sheets is a free public service.
Select a Docket Sheet Search Type from the dropdown (default search type is by Docket Number)
Search Type:
Enter the desired search criteria and click Search (available search criteria changes based upon the type selected above)
* Court Name:
and any combination of
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Attorney First Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed: through
JUDICIALTO
LETTER CONDUCT
BRETT I. BOARD
COLE COMPLAINT Page
Page
No.6 15
of 37
of 59 Friday
MondayDecember
August 9,
7, 2016
2017
1 of 1 12/7/2016 5:17 AM
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
Stanley J. Caterbone :
APPELLANT : CASE NO. Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
:
:
AND NOW, on this 28th day of October, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, appearing pro se,
do hereby file this NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA as per the
ORDER of October 5, 2016 and do file the attached APPLICATION FOR IN FORMA
PAUPERIS. Attached is also a Money Order for the $75.00 filing fee as per your previous
instructions.
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT I. COLE NOTICE OF APPEAL
Page
Page
No.1 16
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT I. COLE NOTICE OF APPEAL
Page
Page
No.2 17
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT I. COLE NOTICE OF APPEAL
Page
Page
No.3 18
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT I. COLE NOTICE OF APPEAL
Page
Page
No.4 19
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT I. COLE NOTICE OF APPEAL
Page
Page
No.5 20
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
If the Court would consider the leqal circumstances surrounding my Whistleblowing activities and
the Federal False Claims Act filing of the APPELLANT as it relates to the past 28 years and the
myriad of violations of the Lancaster County District Attorney. The APPELLANT wil argue that it is
wholly unfair and unconstitutional not to grant the APPELLANT In Forma Pauperis Status. The
APPELLANT has filed ample evidence of a pattern and relentless cycle of earning and accumulating
capital and assets, as well building substantial worth through his business interests, only to have
it all extorted through an elaborate civil and criminal scheme to defruad. Therefore any
attempt to subject the APPELLANT to more court related fees is only a continuation of
that same said fraud.
Consideration should be given to Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District,
where the courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due
process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F
2d. 644) have concluded the following: Even the probability of unfairness can result in a
defendant being deprived of his due process rights. The focus of these claims are recorded in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 05-2288 and 06-4650. In
addition the Petioner is the MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambrerrt Case and recently filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment, 04-2559, which was recently appealed to the Third Circuit Court
of Appeals. The preceding cases have been preserved by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in
case no. 07-4474, see attached.
The prosecutorial misconduct the the APPELLANT has been subject to has violated his
constitutional rights, but more importantly the abuse or process has prevented the APPELLANT
from completing a wealth of claims in both state and federal Courts. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and
18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting
constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide
for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are
ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from
federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5,
15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
A case can be made for a RICO violation as defined in the case of United States v. Holck,
389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the
following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an
indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which
attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing
acts in furtherance of an overall plan. This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to
cover-up my International Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT I. COLE NOTICE OF APPEAL
Page
Page
No.6 21
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
The attached 29 False Arrests, which under Pennsylvania Law, constitute a conspiracy that
may be proved by circumstantial evidence that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant
an inference that the unlawful combination has been in front of facts formed for the purpose
charged. See Walcker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the following
was supported: Arrestees allegations that the township (Conestoga) and its police officers were
acting in concert and conspiracy and with the purpose of violating arrestees constitutional rights
by subjecting him to unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two
(2) or more officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5 th, 2006 and August
4th, 2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody. The preceding
pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.
In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law,
a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to
do an unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice
with intent to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United
States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple
conspiracies by the following: Governments, without committing variance between single
conspiracy charges in an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at
continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which
involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. 1983 Civil
Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the
scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations
to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations
when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to
strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241,
242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982,
1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT I. COLE NOTICE OF APPEAL
Page
Page
No.7 22
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
1References
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT I. COLE NOTICE OF APPEAL
Page
Page
No.8 23
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS Rights
OF CIVIL Violation and
CONSPIRACY TOJudicial
COMMITMisconduct
EXTORTION
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
Public
PUBLIC
Case Corruption
LETTER
No.CORRUPTION- Clerk
I.- Clerk
of Courts
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT COLE of Courts
& Prothonot
NOTICE& Prothonot
Prothonotary
OF APPEAL Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
No.20
918
18
24
ofof
of
of128
23
of85
89
59 Monday
FridayAugust
Monday October 21,
17,
7, 28,
20172016
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OFCivil
Rights
Civil
CIVILRights
Violation
Rights Violation
CONSPIRACY and
and
TOJudicial
JudicialMisconduct
COMMIT Misconduct
EXTORTION
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY
DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET
Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Page 1 of 5
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned: Date Filed: 07/07/2016 Initiation Date: 07/07/2016
OTN: LOTN: Originating Docket No: MJ-02301-TR-0000861-2016
Initial Issuing Authority: Scott E. Albert Final Issuing Authority: Scott E. Albert
Arresting Agency: East Hempfield Twp Police Dept Arresting Officer: Keen, Christopher Michael
Complaint/Incident #: E 0007452-4
Case Local Number Type(s) Case Local Number(s)
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status: Closed Status Date Processing Status Complaint Date: 05/10/2016
10/05/2016 Sentenced/Penalty Imposed
10/05/2016 Awaiting Sentencing
07/07/2016 Awaiting Original Papers
07/07/2016 Awaiting Summary Appeal Trial
DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Date Of Birth: 07/15/1958 City/State/Zip: Lancaster, PA 17603
Alias Name
Caterbone, Stanley Jay
Caterbone, Stanley Joseph
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type Name
Defendant Caterbone, Stanley J.
CHARGES
Seq. Orig Seq. Grade Statute Statute Description Offense Dt. OTN
1 1 S 75 3322 Vehicle Turning Left 05/09/2016
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event Disposition Date Final Disposition
Sequence/Description Offense Disposition Grade Section
Sentencing Judge Sentence Date Credit For Time Served
Sentence/Diversion Program Type Incarceration/Diversionary Period Start Date
Sentence Conditions
Guilty
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
PUBLIC
Public
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Case
LETTER
No. only
TObeBRETT
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTIONprovided
CORRUPTION by
- ClerkI.- the
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 -Pennsylvania
Clerk
- of
Clerk
COLE Judge
Clerk
Courts State
ofofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&Courts
NOTICE Police.
Totaro
Prothonot
OF Moreover
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
APPEAL an
Page
P employer
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
age No. 11
12
15
313
10 13who
of
of
25of
of
ofdoes
61
69
82
of128
2383
85
8959not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
MondayHistory
Friday
Monday Record 15,
October
October
August
October 14,
16,
17,
7, 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28,
20172016
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OFCivil
Rights
Civil
CIVILRights
Violation
Rights Violation
CONSPIRACY and
and
TOJudicial
JudicialMisconduct
COMMIT Misconduct
EXTORTION
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY
DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET
Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Page 2 of 5
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event Disposition Date Final Disposition
Sequence/Description Offense Disposition Grade Section
Sentencing Judge Sentence Date Credit For Time Served
Sentence/Diversion Program Type Incarceration/Diversionary Period Start Date
Sentence Conditions
Summary Appeal Trial 10/05/2016 Final Disposition
1 / Vehicle Turning Left Guilty S 75 3322
Totaro, Donald R. 10/05/2016
No Further Penalty
ENTRIES
Sequence Number CP Filed Date Document Date Filed By
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
PUBLIC
Public
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Case
LETTER
No. only
TObeBRETT
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTIONprovided
CORRUPTION by
- ClerkI.- the
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 -Pennsylvania
Clerk
- of
Clerk
COLE Judge
Clerk
Courts State
ofofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&Courts
NOTICE Police.
Totaro
Prothonot
OF Moreover
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
APPEAL an
Page
P employer
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
age No. 12
13
16
414
11 14who
of
of
26of
of
ofdoes
61
69
82
of128
2383
85
8959not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
MondayHistory
Friday
Monday Record 15,
October
October
August
October 14,
16,
17,
7, 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28,
20172016
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OFCivil
Rights
Civil
CIVILRights
Violation
Rights Violation
CONSPIRACY and
and
TOJudicial
JudicialMisconduct
COMMIT Misconduct
EXTORTION
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY
DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET
Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Page 3 of 5
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone
ENTRIES
Sequence Number CP Filed Date Document Date Filed By
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
PUBLIC
Public
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Case
LETTER
No. only
TObeBRETT
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTIONprovided
CORRUPTION by
- ClerkI.- the
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 -Pennsylvania
Clerk
- of
Clerk
COLE Judge
Clerk
Courts State
ofofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&Courts
NOTICE Police.
Totaro
Prothonot
OF Moreover
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
APPEAL an
Page
P employer
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
age No. 13
14
17
515
12 15who
of
of
27of
of
ofdoes
61
69
82
of128
2383
85
8959not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
MondayHistory
Friday
Monday Record 15,
October
October
August
October 14,
16,
17,
7, 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28,
20172016
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OFCivil
Rights
Civil
CIVILRights
Violation
Rights Violation
CONSPIRACY and
and
TOJudicial
JudicialMisconduct
COMMIT Misconduct
EXTORTION
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY
DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET
Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Page 4 of 5
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone
CASE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Last Payment Date: Total of Last Payment:
Caterbone, Stanley J. Assessment Payments Adjustments Non Monetary Total
Defendant Payments
Costs/Fees
ATJ $4.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4.00
CAT/MCARE/General Fund $45.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $45.00
CJES $2.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.25
Clerk Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211 $27.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $27.50
(Lancaster)
Clerk of Court Auto Fee-Costs $5.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5.00
6593AAB1211 (Lan)
Commonwealth Cost - HB627 (Act 167 $8.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8.55
of 1992)
County Court Cost (Act 204 of 1976) $21.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $21.40
DA Administration Fee - $25.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $25.00
6421AB130019021 (Lan)
DA Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211 $10.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10.00
(Lancaster)
Emergency Medical Services (Act 45 of $10.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10.00
1985)
JCPS $21.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $21.25
Judicial Computer Project $8.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8.00
Sheriff Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211 $2.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.00
(Lancaster)
State Court Costs (Act 204 of 1976) $8.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8.55
Hearing Costs $8.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8.00
Prosecution Cost - 6411AB1211 $6.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6.68
(Lancaster)
Fines
Title 75, Motor Vehicle (Motor License $12.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12.50
Fund)
Title 75, Motor Vehicle (Motor License $12.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12.50
Fund)
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
PUBLIC
Public
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Case
LETTER
No. only
TObeBRETT
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTIONprovided
CORRUPTION by
- ClerkI.- the
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 -Pennsylvania
Clerk
- of
Clerk
COLE Judge
Clerk
Courts State
ofofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&Courts
NOTICE Police.
Totaro
Prothonot
OF Moreover
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
APPEAL an
Page
P employer
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
age No. 14
15
18
616
13 16who
of
of
28of
of
ofdoes
61
69
82
of128
2383
85
8959not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
MondayHistory
Friday
Monday Record 15,
October
October
August
October 14,
16,
17,
7, 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28,
20172016
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OFCivil
Rights
Civil
CIVILRights
Violation
Rights Violation
CONSPIRACY and
and
TOJudicial
JudicialMisconduct
COMMIT Misconduct
EXTORTION
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY
DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET
Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Page 5 of 5
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone
** - Indicates assessment is subrogated
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
PUBLIC
Public
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Case
LETTER
No. only
TObeBRETT
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTIONprovided
CORRUPTION by
- ClerkI.- the
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 -Pennsylvania
Clerk
- of
Clerk
COLE Judge
Clerk
Courts State
ofofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&Courts
NOTICE Police.
Totaro
Prothonot
OF Moreover
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
APPEAL an
Page
P employer
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
age No. 15
16
19
717
14 17who
of
of
29of
of
ofdoes
61
69
82
of128
2383
85
8959not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
MondayHistory
Friday
Monday Record 15,
October
October
August
October 14,
16,
17,
7, 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28,
20172016
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS Rights
OF CIVIL Violation and
CONSPIRACY TOJudicial
COMMITMisconduct
EXTORTION
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
Public
PUBLIC
Case Corruption
LETTER
No.CORRUPTION- Clerk
I.- Clerk
of Courts
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT COLE of Courts
& Prothonot
NOTICE& Prothonot
OF APPEAL Page
Page
Page
P age 23
No.21
15 of
30of
of 128
of
2389
59 FridayAugust
Monday October 21,
7, 28,
20172016
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS Rights
OF CIVIL Violation and
CONSPIRACY TOJudicial
COMMITMisconduct
EXTORTION
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
Public
PUBLIC
Case Corruption
LETTER
No.CORRUPTION- Clerk
I.- Clerk
of Courts
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT COLE of Courts
& Prothonot
NOTICE& Prothonot
OF APPEAL Page
Page
Page
P age 24
No.22
16 of
31of
of 128
of
2389
59 FridayAugust
Monday October 21,
7, 28,
20172016
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS Rights
OF CIVIL Violation and
CONSPIRACY TOJudicial
COMMITMisconduct
EXTORTION
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
Public
PUBLIC
Case Corruption
LETTER
No.CORRUPTION- Clerk
I.- Clerk
of Courts
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT COLE of Courts
& Prothonot
NOTICE& Prothonot
OF APPEAL Page
Page
Page
P age 25
No.23
17 of
32of
of 128
of
2389
59 FridayAugust
Monday October 21,
7, 28,
20172016
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS Rights
OF CIVIL Violation and
CONSPIRACY TOJudicial
COMMITMisconduct
EXTORTION
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
Public
PUBLIC
Case Corruption
LETTER
No.CORRUPTION- Clerk
I.- Clerk
of Courts
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT COLE of Courts
& Prothonot
NOTICE& Prothonot
OF APPEAL Page
Page
Page
P age 22
No.20
18 of
33of
of 128
of
2389
59 FridayAugust
Monday October 21,
7, 28,
20172016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 CivilCivil
Rights
Civil Rights
Violation
Rights Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
Lancaster
July 7, 2016
XXXXXXXXXX October 28, 2016
LETTER
IN FORMA TOPAUPERIS
BRETT I. COLE
APPLICATION Page No.134
Page ofof5 59 Monday
Friday August28,
October 7, 2016
2017
PUBLIC
Public
INPUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
FORMACORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
PAUPERIS MDJ
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
APPLICATIONofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page57
36
44
66
58
60
64of
1 of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89 Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
October 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28, 2016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 CivilCivil
Rights
Civil Rights
Violation
Rights Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
Lancaster
LETTER
IN FORMA TOPAUPERIS
BRETT I. COLE
APPLICATION Page No.235
Page ofof5 59 Monday
Friday August28,
October 7, 2016
2017
PUBLIC
Public
INPUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
FORMACORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
PAUPERIS MDJ
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
APPLICATIONofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page58
37
45
67
59
61
65of
2 of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89 Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
October 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28, 2016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 CivilCivil
Rights
Civil Rights
Violation
Rights Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
LETTER
IN FORMA TOPAUPERIS
BRETT I. COLE
APPLICATION Page No.336
Page ofof5 59 Monday
Friday August28,
October 7, 2016
2017
PUBLIC
Public
INPUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
FORMACORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
PAUPERIS MDJ
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
APPLICATIONofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page59
38
46
68
60
62
66of
3 of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89 Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
October 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28, 2016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 CivilCivil
Rights
Civil Rights
Violation
Rights Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
REPOSESSED
LETTER
IN FORMA TOPAUPERIS
BRETT I. COLE
APPLICATION Page No.437
Page ofof5 59 Monday
Friday August28,
October 7, 2016
2017
PUBLIC
Public
INPUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
FORMACORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
PAUPERIS MDJ
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
APPLICATIONofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page60
39
47
69
61
63
67of
4 of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89 Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
October 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28, 2016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 CivilCivil
Rights
Civil Rights
Violation
Rights Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
XXXXXXXXX
LETTER
IN FORMA TOPAUPERIS
BRETT I. COLE
APPLICATION Page No.538
Page ofof5 59 Monday
Friday August28,
October 7, 2016
2017
PUBLIC
Public
INPUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
FORMACORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
PAUPERIS MDJ
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
APPLICATIONofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page61
40
48
70
62
64
68of
5 of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89 Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
October 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28, 2016
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
DOCUMENT DIVIDER
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200
MARCH 21, 2017
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud
within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the
truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public
corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications
are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County
and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture
from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
4. History of the Internet - DARPA and Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group
March 12, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341681178/History-of-the-Internet-
DARPA-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-and-Advanced-Media-Group-March-12-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340996107/Stan-J-Caterbone-LETTER-to-Matthew-H-
Haverstick-re-MARTIN-v-Reese-CI-17-04626-March-5-2017
11. STAN J. CATERBONE NEW CASE IN U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT IN EASTERN
DISTRICT CASE No. 17-867 CATERBONE v. NSA, et.al., PRELIMINARY INJUCTION
FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF https://www.scribd.com/document/340923402/STAN-J-
CATERBONE-NEW-CASE-Case-No-17-cv-00867-EGS-Preliminary-Injunction-for-
EMERGENCY-RELIEF-in-U-S-EASTERN-District-of-Pennsylvania-March-4-20
19. STAN J. CATERBONE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CASE No.
CI-08-13373 PREACIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS MASON PFLUMM et.al., February
25, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/340354387/Lancaster-County-Court-Case-
No-08-CI-13373-re-PRAECIPE-TO-ADD-DEFENDANTS-February-25-2017
1. ERIC COHEN AND ROBERT BERUBE, Federal Public Defender for Esteban Santiago, Ft.
Lauderdale Shooter, INVOICE AND FEE SCHEDULE January 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337072519/ERIC-COHEN-Federal-Public-
Defender-for-Esteban-Santiago-Ft-Lauderdale-Shooter-INVOICE-AND-FEE-
SCHEDULE-January-20-2017
5. Video: Media Blacks Out Edward Snowdens Talk On COINTELPRO & History Of Mass
Surveillance
http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-media-blacks-out-edward-snowdens-talk-
on-cointelpro-history-of-mass-surveillance/224222/
6. Letters: Snowden deserves pardon by John and Bonnie Raines, Philadelphia of the
Citizens Commission to Investigate the FBI in 1971
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20170119_Letters__Snowden_deserves_pa
rdon.html
9. That time the CIA was convinced a self-proclaimed psychic had paranormal abilities
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/01/19/that-time-
the-cia-was-convinced-a-self-proclaimed-psychic-had-paranormal-abilities/?
postshare=8421484844095309&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.b487b6ae00e7
10. Obama's most enduring legacy may be the establishment of the modern US
surveillance state
http://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-most-enduring-legacy-the-modern-us-
surveillance-state-2017-1
11. The Extortion of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pa by COINTELPRO PROGRAMS
January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336832214/The-Extortion-of-220-Stone-Hill-
Road-Conestoga-Pa-by-COINTELPRO-PROGRAMS-January-17-2017
12. AMG LEGAL SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE Mastered on April 16, 1991 at Commadore Inc.,
January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787897/AMG-LEGAL-SYSTEMS-
PROTOTYPE-Mastered-on-April-16-1991-at-Commadore-Inc-January-17-2017
13. Stan J. Caterbone, Controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., 1993 to 1998 January 17,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787739/Stan-J-Caterbone-Controller-of-
Pflumm-Contractors-Inc-1993-to-1998-January-17-2017
14. Sam Lombardo and Raolph Mazzochi Charlotte Street Proposal by Advanced Media
Group and Stan J. Caterbone January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787416/Sam-Lombardo-and-Raolph-Mazzochi-
Charlotte-Street-Proposal-by-Advanced-Media-Group-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-
17-2017
16. 1999 Excelsior Place Business Plan by Stan J. Caterbone January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336719627/1999-Excelsior-Place-Business-Plan-
by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-2017
17. Stan J. Caterbone AIM MUTUAL FUNDS Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336738750/Stan-J-Caterbone-AIM-MUTUAL-
FUNDS-Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-January-16-2017
18. Pro Financial Group Brochure and Eastern Regional Free Agent Camp by Stan J.
Caterbone January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336704842/Pro-Financial-Group-Brochure-and-
Eastern-Regional-Free-Agent-Camp-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-2017
19. STAN J. CATERBONE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP JOINT VENTURE WITH DALE HIGH
January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637179/56-STAN-J-CATERBONE-ADVANCED-
MEDIA-GROUP-JOINT-VENTURE-WITH-DALE-HIGH-January-15-2017
21. 1987 JOINT VENTURE - Tony Bongiovi, Power Station Studios, and Flatbush Films
with Stan J. Caterbone January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637176/55-1987-JOINT-VENTURE-Tony-
Bongiovi-Power-Station-Studios-and-Flatbush-Films-with-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-
15-2017
22. STAN J. CATERBONE'S Financial Management Group, Ltd., Anti-Trust Litigation File
of October 17, 2015
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637173/57-STAN-J-CATERBONE-S-Financial-
Management-Group-Ltd-Anti-Trust-Litigation-File-of-October-17-2015
24. Letter REQUEST for COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to
President Obama, November 15, 2016
25. Stan J. Caterbone and Conflicts With the Trump Administration - Monday November
14, 2016 | False Claims Act | Military
26. STAN J. CATERBONE and the DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE Documents and Evidence of
Conspiracy to .... Saturday November 12, 2016
27. Feds Probe Fulton Bank and 3 Other Subsidiary Banks of Fulton Financial With Stan
J. Caterbone Civil Actions and Mind Control Research of Monday November 9, 2016 |
29. Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Cointelpro Used to Obstruct Justice
Monday November 28, 2016 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | Central Intelligence
Agency
30. VITALLY IMPORTANT - LETTER and DOCUMENT to Cappello & Noel, LLP of Santa
Barbara, CA Friday November 25, 2016
32. Pro Se Legal Representation In The United States | Motion In United States Law
33. Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray Says There is Room for Improvement in Police
34. Communication - CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Bureau, et.al., November 22,
2016 | Central Intelligence Agency
35. Chapter 12 - ROHYPNOL AND SATELLITE and Chapter 11 - NEIGHBORS FROM HELL,
from Satellite Terrorism in America, by Dr. John Hall Copyright 2009
37. JIM GUERIN, FOUNDER OF ISC, FAREWELL LETTER OF 1989 December 26, 2016 |
Justice | Government
38. CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON Candidate for JUDGESHIP and His 1987 EFFORT FOR MY
GUARDIANSHIP Friday December 16, 2016
39. ANOTHER LANCASTER COVER-UP THE SALE OF THE MASONIC HALL IN THE CITY OF
LANCASTER, by The Advanced Media Group, December 15, 2016 | Fraternal Service
Organizations
41. My Friend and Colleague Soleilmavis Liu of China a Victim of Mind Control Living in
China Who Started Peacepink- August 28, 2016
42. TD Ameritrade TRADEKEEPER PROFIT-LOSS FOR 2004 TRADES and 2017 FULTON
STOCK January 9, 2017
43. POLICE INCIDENT REPORTS OF PHYSICAL ASSAULTS FOR STAN J. CATERBONE 2005
TO 2016 January 6, 2017
44. Judiciaries
48. Torture
49. Stan J. Caterbone on Twitter: "I'm reading FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL
INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence... on @Scribd! https://t.co/T3D9nIYvMt
#ReadMore"
50. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 re PRAECIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS
COMEY AND TRUMP REMOVE OBAMA January 23, 2017
51. INVOICE AND Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Pro Se Billings Invoice
Wednesday November 30, 2016
52. Kathy Harrison (KATHLEEN HARRISON NAMED IN SAVAGE SUIT v. Dave Brown)
Email Re Bi Polar March 10, 2005
54. LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Cases No. CI-17-00210 and CI-17-
00206 BOWMAN and SAVAGE v. BROWN, et.al.,
55. REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE and AMICUS BRIEF January 25, 2017.pdf | Amicus
Curiae | National Security Agency
56. Family of Karlie Hall files suit against Millersville University, others; calls death
preventable January 25, 2017 | Law Reference | Government
57. Stan J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Filled in Forms January 27, 2017
58. U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT ISSUANCE LETTER FOR NEW CASE NO. 17-10615-ref To
Judge Fehling Friday January 27, 2017
59. Stan J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 17-10615 Judge Fehling Filed On
January 27, 2017 - CASE FILE | Plea | Defamation
60. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 EXHIBIT re THE DONALD TRUMP
PRESIDENCY and STAN J. CATERBONE as of January 28, 2017 - electronically filed |
Federal Bureau Of Investigation | Nasa
61. ACCIDENT REPORT NO. 1701-029468 LANCASTER CITY POLICE OFFICER REPPERT
SATURDAY JANUARY 28, 2017
62. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 PRAECIPE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
January 29, 2017 - FILED ELECTRONICALLY January 29, 2017
64. 16-cv-2513 Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief in Middle District NOTICE
OF APPEAL TO USCA THIRD CIRCUIT January 26, 2017 | Defamation
66. Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se, U.S.C.A. Third Circuit BRIEF STATEMENT OF JUDICIAL
MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY of February 1, 2017
69. Jeremy Scahill on Donald Trump and the Military-Industrial Complex - Truthdig
In an interview with acTVism, the investigative journalist also discusses the
70. significance of the Ramstein Air Base in Germany. - 2017/02/02
71. Pennsylvania State Police Liquor Control Enforcement Formal Complaint AGAINST
DOWNTOWN LANCASTER BARS, August 12, 2016 | Lawsuit | United States Courts Of
Appeals
73. Torture LAW and the United States - Wikipedia by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP, February 4, 2017
74. CI-16-08472 DOCKET SHEET February 3, 2017 and Torture LAW and the United
States - Wikipedia by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, February 4,
2017
75. LIP News - CORRUPTION IN THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND LNP -
February 4, 2017
78. 16-Cv-2513 Preliminary Injunction for EMERGENCY RELIEF in Middle District ORDER
by JUDGE KANE TRANSFER to EASTERN DISTRICT PHIL January 31, 2017
82. Third Circuit Senior Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, who is President Donald
Trump’s older sister, decided this week to go inactive on the bench, relinquishing
her staff and chambers despite being scheduled to hear cases this year.
83. STAN J. CATERBONE June 18, 2008 US District Court Case 08-02982 CATERBONE v.
Lancaster City Police Bureau, et.al., CASE FILE | Complaint