Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Design Report of A Go Kart Vehicle

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

DESIGN REPORT OF A GO KART VEHICLE

SHAIK HIMAM SAHEB1 GOVARDHANA REDDY 2 Md. HAMEED3


123
Assistant professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Guru Nanak Institute of Technology, Hyderabad. himam.mech@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
This paper concentrates on explaining the design and engineering aspects of making a Go Kart for student karting
championship 2015. This report explains objectives, assumptions and calculations made in designing a Go Kart.The teams
primary objective is to design a safe and functional vehicle based on rigid and torsion free frame. The design is chosen such
that the Kart is easy to fabricate in every possible aspect.

INTRODUCTION
We approached our design by considering all
possible alternatives for a system and modeling them in
CAD software SOLIDWORKS and subjected to analysis
using ANSYS based on analysis result, the model was
modified and retested and a final design was fixed. The
design process of the vehicle is based on various
engineering aspects depending upon
Safety and Ergonomics
Market Availability
Cost of the Components
Safe Engineering Practices
With this we had view of our Kart. We set up some
parameters of our work and team has been divided into
core groups.
Design
Engine and Transmission
Steering
Brakes and wheels
Business and Management

Weld ability
Availability
Properties Of IS1161 Seamless Tube
Properties

Metric

Ultimate tensile strength

415Mpa

Yield tensile strength

310Mpa

Poissons ratio

0.3

DIMENSIONAL SPECIFICATIONS
Round tube of dimension = 25.4mm OD
Thickness

= 2mm

LITERATURE REVIEW
Being a new team we required a clear idea of
basic requirements, parameters and design of Go Kart. We
made a detailed study on Go Kart and visited Runway9,
Hyderabad a Famous Go Karting Spot. We gained more
knowledge during our field study and our basic doubts on
dgn were cleared.

DESIGN OF KART
The following design methodology was used during
design:
Requirements
Design calculations and Analysis
Considerations
Testing
Acceptance

JUSTIFICATION
Round hollow tubes are light in weight

MATERIAL SELECTION
IS1161 is selected for the chassis because of the following
reasons

Machinability

FABRICATION PROCESSES

Lathe Work, Cutting, Drilling, Milling, Shaping ,


Grinding, Polishing, Finishing, Welding

Front Impact Analysis


Using the gross weight of the vehicle is 160kg
The impact Force was calculated based on G-load of 5

Load applied: 2500N


Maximum stress: 125.86Mpa
Displacement: 6mm
Factor of safety: 2.4
Load applied: 5000 N
Maximum stress induced: 171.8 Mpa
Displacement: 1.9mm
Factor of safety: 2.2

Wheel Hub Analysis


The following are the considerations took for the design of
wheel hub for 25.4 mm shaft:
Material: Mild Steel
Braking torque: 975N-m
Load: 1500N

Side Impact Analysis

Maximum stress : 182Mpa


Yield strength: 221Mpa
Factor of safety: 1.21

Disc Hub Analysis


The following are the considerations took for the design of
wheel hub for 25.4 mm shaft:
Material: Mild Steel
Braking torque: 975N-m
Load: 1500N
Load applied: 3500N
Maximum stress induced: 121.1Mpa
Displacement: 1.14mm
Factor of safety: 2.5

Rear Impact Analysis

Disc Hub Analysis (Cont..)

Isometric View of the vehicle


Maximum stress: 140Mpa
Yield strength: 221Mpa
Factor of safety: 1.57

VEHICLE DRAWING AND DIMENSIONING

Rear View of the vehicle

Isometric view of the vehicle

Side View of the vehicle

Front View of the vehicle

Top view of vehicle

DIFFERENT VIEWS OF THE VEHICLE


Top View of the vehicle

DESIGN PARAMETERS

CHASSIS

Seamless tube

WHEELBASE

1066.8 mm

turns with a small input and being more precise at the


same time. We also attain a perspective turning radius of
2.37meter.
COMPONENTS

OVERALL
LENGTH OF
VEHICLE

TRACK WIDTH

IS 1161

1778 mm

14 inch x 0.5 inch

914.4 mm

Front

1066.8 mm

Rear

TYPE OF
ENGINE

3.5HP 127cc
engine

STEERING

Mechanical
linkage

DIMENSIONS

Tie Rod
3 inch x 1.5 inch x 11mm
King-Pin
3.5 inch x 2.5 inch x 0.5 inch

10*4.5*5

Bracket
front

WHEELS AND
TYRES

11*7.1*5

rear

BRAKES

Hydraulic disc
brake

Rear

TRANSMISSIO
N

Centrifugal clutch

MASS OF THE
VEHICLE
GROUND
CLEARANCE

1 inch x 2 inch x 10 mm
Pit-man arm
10 mm
Bolt

Steering shaft
87.8kg

approx.

2 Inch

from bottom most


part

STEERING SYSTEM
Mechanical arrangement is planned to be used
this type of steering system was selected because of its
simple working mechanism and a steering ratio of 1:1 so
to simple we have used mechanical type linkage.

10 inch
Steering wheel

According to the Ackermann geometry the front


tyres will rotate about the mean point as a result the entire
force will act on the outer front tyre on a corner. Thus the
cornering traction will be primarily governed by the outer
tyre.
We have chosen the mechanical linkage because it
is cheap, light in weight and easy to manufacture.

CONSIDERATIONS
SELECTION

Our steering geometry is having 99% Ackerman


and also gives 60degree lock to lock turn of steering wheel
which is very suitable for the race track as it allows quick

20 inch x 1 inch

FOR

STEERING

Amount of steering wheel travelling is


decreased

It is simple and cheap

GEOMETRY

VALUES

Caster Angle

12 degrees

Camber Angle

0 degrees

King pin Inclination

10 degrees

Combined Angle

10 degrees

Toe-in

5 mm

Scrub Radius

9 mm

Minimum Turning Radius

1.12 m

Maximum Turning Radius

2.59m

CALCULATIONS
Inner lock angle () = (total steering wheel rotation * 360)
/ steering ratio = 40 degrees
Outer lock angle()= cot cot = w / l = 25.57degrees
Ackerman angle calculation: Tan = (sin sin ) / (cos
+ cos 2) = 32.46 degrees
Ackerman inside angle: = tan -1 (WB / (WB / tan
TW)) = 13.36 degrees
Ackerman percentage: %Ackerman = ((inside angle outside angle) / (Inside 100% Ackerman)) * 100% =
99.97%
Turning Radius(R max) Calculation

No.

diameter in
mm

mm

Pulsar 150

240

Pulsar 220

230

Apache RTR 180

200

Reasons for selection for apache RTR 180 disc

Thickness (6mm) is not too high

Outer diameter is 200mm which is in


accordance with our required design

We have used floating type calliper in our design and


finalised Apache RTR 180 calliper

BRAKE FLUIDS
We have decided to use DOT 3 Brake fluid
Economical
Easily available
Compatible

WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION
Gross weight of the kart
Front: Rear

=
=

160kgs
2:3

Type

Specification

Rear disc

OD 200 mm

Master
cylinder Dia.

10 mm

Caliper piston
diameter

25.4 mm

Brake Pedal
Lever ratio

4:1

Stopping
distance

2.237 m

R min = length of wheel base / tan = 1.12 m


R max 2= [R min + Wheel track width] 2 +Length of wheel
base 2] = 2.59 m

BRAKING SYSTEM
The braking system has to provide enough
braking force to completely lock the wheels at the end of a
specified acceleration run, it also proved to be cost
effective. The braking system was designed by determining
parameters necessary to produce a given deceleration, and
comparing to the deceleration that a known braking
system would produce.
Considerations for braking system selection:
Discs, calipers and master cylinders which were
used for considering suitable vehicle after market survey

CALCULATIONS
Sr.

Disc

Outer

Thickness in

1.Gross weight of the vehicle

v2 u2 = 2*a*ds (v=0,u=12.5m/s)

W = weight of the vehicle (with load conditions) in kgs


* 9.81= 160*9.81=1569.6N

Stopping Distance =2.2370meters

2. Brake line pressure :


p = force on the brakes / area of master cylinders
(as pedal ratio is 4:1)
( Assume the normal force applied on the pedal: 350n)
= pedal ratio *force on the pedal / area of master cylinder

ENGINE AND TRANSMISSION


The engine in deployed in our Kart is BRIGGS
and STRATTON 3.5HP 127 CC it has 14kg weight with
single cylinder.

ENGINE SPECIFICATIONS

= 4*350/(/4)*(0.01)2
= 17.8343Mpa

Configuration

Value

Engine Technology

single cylinder , 4stroke,air cooled ,


OHV(Over Head Valve)

Maximum Power

3.5 HP@3600 R.P.M

Gross Torque

7.5 N-M@2600 R.P.M

Bore*Stroke

62mm*42mm

Displacement

127cc

Dry Weight

14 Kg

Fuel Capacity

1.8L

Length

261mm

Width

347mm

Height

326mm

3.Clamping force (CF):


Cf= brake line pressure *(area of caliper piston*2)
= 17.8343*( ( / 4 ) * (25.4 * 10-3 ) 2 * 2 )
= 18064.6825N
4. rotating force:
RF = CF* number of caliper pistons * coefficient friction
of brake pads
=18064.4334*0.3*2
=10838.6825N
5. braking torque (tn) = rotating force* effective disc
radius
=10838.6825*0.09
=975.48 N-m

Assuming transmission efficiency =

80%

(torque available at the two tires of the rear shaft)

Gross weight of the Kart

160kgs

6. braking force=(braking torque /tire radius)*0.8

number of teeth on CVT output

=6982.6677*0.8

number of teeth on rear shaft sprocket=36

=5586.0820N

Ratio

=54

=0.66:1

7.deceralation:
f=-ma(-ve sign indicates force in opposite
direction)
SPEED
(RPM)

CVT RATIO

SPROCKET
RATIO

FINAL
RATIO

=-34.913m/s

1850

16

0.66

10.56

8. stopping distance:

2750

10

0.66

6.6

a=-B.f/m=5586.0820/160

3600

6.4

0.66

4.224

CALCULATIONS
Speed
= (circumference of the wheel *
rear shaft rpm) / (60*1000) m/s
=
(60*1000)

*11*25.4*852.27

)/

= 12.468 m/s
= 44.86 km/hr.
Drive torque

= engine torque * reduction *


efficiency
=7.5*16*0.66*0.8 = 63.36 Nm

Drive force

= drive torque/radius of wheel


= 63.36*1000/5.5*25.4 =

453.54 N
Acceleration

SPECIFICATIONS

VALUES

KNEE ANGLE

150 DEGREES

ELBOW ANGLE

95 DEGREES

= Drive Force/mass
= 453.54/160= 2.83 /s2

ELECTRICALS
BODY WORKS
External appearance of the vehicle depends upon
bodyworks. It is an important part of the vehicle design. It
also dominates sale and marketing of the vehicle.
We have selected fiber on the basis of market survey
because of its

light weight

good electrical insulator

SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS


Safety is the most important concern for our Gokart. Bumper is provided for safety. In addition fire
extinguishers and kill switches will also be used in case of
emergency. Ergonomics are designed perfectly for the
comfort of the driver.

12V DC Battery will be used to power all the


electrical components.
CONCLUSION:
The design and construction for GO-KART DESIGN
CHALLENGE 2015 has become more challenging due to
the increased participation. Our team is participating for
the first time in this event so a detailed study of various
automotive systems is taken as our approach. Thus this
report provides a clear insight in design and analysis of
our vehicle
The making of this report has helped us in
learning of various software. We want to give a vote of
Thank you in this regard as GKDC competition has given
as this opportunity to learn many things which will also
help us in leading a bright future.

REFERENCES
1. TUNE TO WIN -Carroll Smith
2. Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics - Thomas a
Gillespie
3. Automobile Engineering Kirpal Singh
4. Wikipedia
5. Google Search engine
6. Jeyanthi Rebecca, L., Dhanalakshmi, V.,
Sharmila, S., Effect of the extract of Ulva sp on

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

pathogenic microorganisms, Journal of Chemical


and Pharmaceutical Research, v-4, i-11, pp-48754878, 2012.
Sharmila, S., Jeyanthi Rebecca, L., GC-MS
Analysis of esters of fatty acid present in biodiesel
produced from Cladophora vagabunda, Journal of
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, v-4, i11, pp-4883-4887, 2012.
Anbuselvi, S., Rebecca, J., A comparative study
on the biodegradation of coir waste by three
different species of Marine cyanobacteria, Journal
of Applied Sciences Research, v-5, i-12, pp-23692374, 2009.
Arunachalam, A.R., Bringing out the effective
learning process by analyzing of E-learning
methodologies, Indian Journal of Science and
Technology, v-7, i-, pp-41-43, 2014.
Sharmila, S., Jeyanthi Rebecca, J., A
comparative study on the degradation of leather
industry effluent by Marine algae, International
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and
Research, v-25, i-2, pp-46-50, 2014.
Anbuselvi, V.S., Isolation and characterization of
polythene degrading bacteria from polythene
dumped garbage, International Journal of
Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research,
v-25, i-2, pp-205-206, 2014.
Sharmila, S., Rebecca Jeyanthi, L., Saduzzaman,
M., Biodegradation of tannery effluent using
Prosopis juliflora, International Journal of
ChemTech Research, v-5, i-5, pp-2186-2192,
2013.
Jaleel, I., Saikumar, P., Devak, P.R., Effect of Hb
% on cognitive skills in UG medical students,
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, v-7,
i-7, pp-1325-1327, 2013.
Hanirex, D.K., Kaliyamurthie, K.P., Mining
frequent itemsets using genetic algorithm, Middle
- East Journal of Scientific Research, v-19, i-6,
pp-807-810, 2014.
Jeyanthi Rebecca, L., Sharmila, S., Das, M.P.,
Seshiah, C., Extraction and purification of
carotenoids from vegetables, Journal of Chemical
and Pharmaceutical Research, v-6, i-4, pp-594598, 2014.
Prem Jeya Kumar, M., Gopalakrishnan, K.,
Srinivasan, V., Anbazhagan, R., Sundeep Aanan,
J., PC modeling and simulation of car suspension
system, Indian Journal of Science and
Technology, v-6, i-SUPPL5, pp-4629-4632, 2013.
Meenakshi, C.M., Kumar, A., Priyadarshi, A.,
Dash, D.K., Krishna, H., Analysis of spur gear
using finite element analysis, Middle - East
Journal of Scientific Research, v-12, i-12, pp1672-1674, 2012.
Sachithanandam, P., Meikandaan, T.P., Srividya,
T., Steel framed multi storey residential building
analysis and design, International Journal of
Applied Engineering Research, v-9, i-22, pp5527-5529, 2014.

19. Automotive Mechanics-William H Crouse

You might also like