The Problem of The Stative
The Problem of The Stative
The Problem of The Stative
This view of the stative was not supported by any special analysis and
formed on the grounds of mere surface analogies and outer correlations. The later
semantic and functional study of statives (their inner properties, historical
productivity, systemic description) showed that statives, though forming a unified
set of words, do not constitute a separate lexemic class existing in language on
exactly the same footing as the noun, the verb, the adjective, the adverb. It should
be looked upon as a subclass within the general class of adjectives since statives
are not directly opposed to the notional parts of speech taken together, but are quite
particularly opposed to the rest of adjectives.
Therefore the general subcategorisation of the class of adjectives is effected
on the two levels:
1) on the upper level the class is divided into the subclass of stative
adjectives and common adjectives;
2) on the lower level the common adjectives fall into qualitative and relative.
Be quiet!
In addition, according to the rules of English syntax, dynamic adjectives
can be inserted into a be + -ingstructure, e.g.
She is being careful.
The doctor was being rude.
Are they being quiet?
Stative adjectives
Stative adjectives denote relatively permanent states, e.g. white, tall,
rotund. Because these states are fairly fixed, they typically cannot be
controlled. Hence, they cannot usually be used in imperative structures,
e.g.
* Be white!
* Dont be tall!
* Be rotund!
Additionally, unlike dynamic adjectives, they cannot be used in be +
-ing structures, e.g.
* She is being white.
* The doctor was being tall.
* Are they being rotund?
Whereas the majority of lexical verbs are dynamic, the majority of
adjectives are stative.