9/2/24, 2:10 PM ircep.gov.in/IRPSM/WorkParticularsDivision.jsp?

workid=0211000269&callforothers=Y&fromfwdscreens=Y

Work Particulars :
53 - Passenger Amenities
Plan Head Priority Rank :
(Type:?)
Short
Sealdah Division - Improvement of suburban stations on North, main & South sections
Description
Description Improvement of suburban stations over Sealdah Division

Sub Head -- Classification : Unclassified

Cost Outlay Cost
Allocation Department
(in Rs. Thousands) (in Rs. Thousands) (in Rs. Thousands)
DF1 269600 0 Cost Civil 7407300
Estimates Abstract Cost
Break-Up
RRSK 540867 0 Electrical (G) 742900
Signal 1572200

Division Sealdah State WEST BENGAL Station/Section Sealdah (SDAH)

Budget Year 2024-2025 Out of Turn No Vetted Cost

Other than Safety
Gauge Route Class Nature of Work
Related
Rail Type Sleeper Type Quantity
ROR(%) Feasibility
Site Plan
CRRM
Required? :
Vetting Status Shortlisting Status with cost with remarks:
DRM Priority Work Tag

Opted for expedite execution of work by initiator of proposal: -

DRM's Personal Certificate Status: - DRM Priority Works Tag: -

Gati-Shakti Tag

Proposal marked under "Gati-Shakti Tag": -

As per decision taken in the meeting held in the GM’s chamber in the presence of Addl. Member (Budget) and other PHODs it
was decided to make a kproposal for imp. Of Sub.Stations of West Bengal area. Therefore, a tentative prop. Was sent to AM
(Budget) and details were discussed on 22.6.10. During the discussion he has suggested certain issues to be incorporated in
the prop and a complete prop should be sent to Rly. Bd duly vetted by finance.
Justification Accordingly the prop for imp of 165 Sub stations have been prepared over SDAH Divn. Incl. the cost of Civil, Elect (G), S&T.
The total cost of the prop comes to Rs 972.24 crores.
The abstract cost is based on the latest LARs over SDAH Divn. It is certified that only those works have been included as
required for improvement of Sub. Station. It is certified that works undertaken for imp. Of Adarsh Stations etc. have been left
out of the kpresent scope of work. There will not be duplication of works.
1) Similar prop of HWH Divn initiated with the details of work completed, works in progress against each stn. Of work. The
details of work already sanctioned at each stn has not been furnished. However, S.DEN/c/SDAJ vide note 17B/CB/PWP/10-11
duly approved by DRM/SDAH dt. 5.7.10 has certified that works undertaken for imp of Adarsha Stn etc have been left out
from the present scope of work and there will not be duplication of works. It is presumed that above certification are based on
a thorough review of all works completed, in progress and sanctioned but not yet started. Presumptions should be confirmed
to avoid duplication. 2) In HWH Divn. Cost of imp. Considered at the average rate of Rs 4.21 crores /stn. (Rs 409 crores for 97
stations) while in SDAH divn. Average cost of imp. Considered at the rate of Rs 5.89 crores per stn. (972 crores for 165 stns)
which is 40% higher than the average cost of HWH Divn. Such higher cost should be supported by detailed justification. 3) As
per p. E-1, 62 nos. Of escalators proposed at 25 stns for Rs 63.61 cr. With variable cost at different stations while summary of
the cost includes provision of escalator for 17 stations for Rs 42.10 cr. Without referring to the no. of such escalator as well as
the stations to be provided with above faculty. Detailed justification should be furnished for such provision with ref. To
availability of FOB, under-pass etc. 4) Cost of removal of encroachment considered at the rate of Rs 5,000/- per shop. Basis of
estimation of unit rate, qty. i.e. no. of shop as well as the scope of work considered needs to be detailed. 5) In spite of specific
Finance
item-wise provision, cost estimate prepared with misc. Cost for lakhs of rupees against each stn which needs to be justified
Remarks
referring to the scope of work considered under the item. 6) Elect. Cost considered at the rate 15% of the Civil Engg. Cost
without any basis or break up. Break up of cost with basis of estimation needs to be enclosed. 7) Considerable amount
proposed for provision of water supply against each stn without referring to the present availability of the system. Cost of each
water booth considered at the rate of Rs 1.5 lakhs per booth. 8) Reasonability of the cost estimation needs to be ensured. 9)
Provn. Of widening of existing platforms needs to be justified with ref. To the requirement as well as available space for such
widening against each station. 10) As per the diagram as well as cost estt. Track drain considered against each station without
referring to present availability. Generally, Track drains are considered against Track Renewal Works and should not come
under passenger amenity work. It needs to be ensured that there is no duplication of work 11) On test checking variation in
unit rates noticed against similar items. Cost of PF surfacing considered at Agarpara Stn @ Rs 3500 /sqm but at Akaipur
considered @ Rs 1500 /sqm; cost of FOB considered @ Rs 2.20 lakhs per mtr. At Barasat and @ Rs 1.04 lakhs per metre at
Burnpur. Such variation in rate may be reviewed and variation should be suitably justified. 12) As it is a Passenger amenity
work, it needs to be approved by CCM. PCE’s approval as well as GM’s kind approval should also be obtained. The proposal
requires the sanction of Rly. Bd.
1) Noted 2) Noted and detailed justification will be supported by the average rate of cost per station, during the sanction of
detailed estimates stage after the sanction of work 3) Noted and all the observations will be complied during detailed estt.
stage, after sanction of the work. 4) The rate has been assumed as per prevailed market rates and the quantities assumed as
per site survey and scope of work 5) Noted and will be complied during the sanction of detailed estimates after sanction of the
Administrative
work. 6) Noted. As this is the abstract cost, all the observations will be complied during sanction of detailed estimate. 7) The
Remarks
provision has been spelt lout as per the site survey and availability basis and the rates assumed for water booth as per the
prevalent market rates. 8) Noted. Will be complied during the stage for sanction of Detailed estimates. 9) Noted. Will be
complied during the stage for sanction of Detailed estimates. 10) Noted and the observation will be ensured. 11) The rate as
identified for PF Surface, FOB etc. Are examined and found justified. 12) Will be complied.

Files
Attached:
S.No. Subject FileName File Type
1 Summary of suburban package P-46(590).jpg Detailed Scope

2 Summary of suburban package P-47(591).jpg Detailed Scope

3 Summary of suburban package P-48(592).jpg Detailed Scope
4 Summary of suburban package P-50(594).jpg Detailed Scope

5 Summary of suburban package P-49(593).jpg Detailed Scope

Download all Attachments

View Other Attachments

Noting View Full Screen

https://ircep.gov.in/IRPSM/WorkParticularsDivision.jsp?workid=0211000269&callforothers=Y&fromfwdscreens=Y 1/2
9/2/24, 2:10 PM ircep.gov.in/IRPSM/WorkParticularsDivision.jsp?workid=0211000269&callforothers=Y&fromfwdscreens=Y

https://ircep.gov.in/IRPSM/WorkParticularsDivision.jsp?workid=0211000269&callforothers=Y&fromfwdscreens=Y 2/2