The Report September 2017 Issue 81
The Report September 2017 Issue 81
The Report September 2017 Issue 81
Issue 81
SEPTEMBER 2017
The Magazine of the International Institute of Marine Surveying
Contents
04 • Editor’s Letter
05 • The President’s 28 30
Column
06 • IIMS Organisation
AND Structure
07 • Marine News
14 • Member News 52 • revolutionary re-use
21 • IIMS 2017 London of polyester boats
Conference Report 58 • Ship Versus Ship
27 • the perils of Collision Claims
undertaking
valuations
21 64 • Teignbridge Propellers
International Ltd and
28 • The new ISO 19030 ETI working on £3m
standard explained high-efficiency
propulsion technology
FEATURE
Offshore Wind and
52 demonstration project
Chief Executive Officer: Mr Mike Schwarz President: Mr Adam Brancher (FIIMS) Vice President: Capt Zarir Irani (FIIMS)
Deputy Vice President: Mr Geoff Waddington (FIIMS) Immediate Past President: Capt Bertrand Apperry (FIIMS)
Mrs Tania Bernice....... Certifying Authority Administrator Mrs Cam Robertson.... Membership Secretary
Head Office Team
Miss Cathryn Ward..... Education, Training & Events Co-ordinator Mr Craig Williams...... Graphic Designer
Miss Elly Bryant.......... Accounts Support Administrator Mr Dave Parsons........ Administrative, Services and Social Media Co-ordinator
Mrs Hilary Excell......... Marine Surveying Academy Business Manager Mrs Sam Owen........... Administration Co-ordinator
Tel: +44 (0) 23 9238 5223 | Email: info@iims.org.uk | IIMS, Murrills House, 48 East Street, Portchester, Hampshire, PO16 9XS, UK | www.iims.org.uk
© The International Institute of Marine Surveying 2017 - The Institute and authors accept no responsibility for any opinions, statements or errors made in any article, feature or letter published in this Magazine.
Regional Directors
Mr Pervez Kaikobad, India Eng. Dimitris Spanos, Eastern Mediterranean
Capt K U R Khan, Pakistan Mick Dyer, Australia Branch Chairman
Mr Monday Ogadina, West Africa Capt Irawan Alwi, Indonesia
Capt Andrew Korek, Canada Mr Zennon Cheng, China
Past Presidents Capt Zillur Bhuiyan FIIMS, Bangladesh
1991 - 1993 Capt William MacDonald
1991 - 1995 Capt David Linacre
1995 - 1996 Capt David Linacre/Capt Andrew Cross Other
1996 - 1997 Capt David Linacre Honorary Fellows
1997 - 2000 Eur Ing Jeffrey Casciani-Wood Mr Peter Morgan
2000 - 2003 Eur Ing Ian Biles Capt Barry Thompson
2003 - 2005 Capt Christopher Spencer Capt Christopher Spencer
2005 - 2007 Capt Ian Wilkins Capt Peter Lambert
2007 - 2010 Capt Allen Brink Capt Satish Anand
2010 - 2012 Mr Peter Morgan Eur Ing Jeffrey Casciani-Wood
2012 - 2014 Capt Satish Anand Capt Bertrand Apperry
2014 - 2016 Capt Bertrand Apperry
In-Country
Representatives
Mr J Renn, USA
Capt G Villasenor, Mexico
Mr J Bru, Panama Other Fellows
Mr G Jugo, Venezuela Mr Derek Levy
Mr P Taylor, Trinidad Mr Martin Pittilo
Capt Eugene Curry, Ireland Mr Peter Broad
Capt F Habibi, Morocco Mr Tony Fernandez
Mr M Zukowski, Germany Mr Milind Tambe
Capt P Oyono, Cameroon Mr Anthony Protopapadakis
Mr A Gnecco, Italy Capt Muhammad Alam
Capt R Lanfranco, Malta Mr Parimal Bhattacharyya
Dr S Favro, Croatia Mr Anthony McGrail
Mr J Rowles, Turkey Capt Reuben Lanfranco
Mr P Ch Lagoussis, East Africa Mr Gerry Grecoussis
Mr R Rozar, Reunion & Mauritius Mr Kay Wrede
Mr P Broad, South Korea
Mr Luc Verley, Singapore
Honorary Members Mr Hans van Bodegraven Mr Parthasarathy Sridharan Capt Matthew Greenen Ms Dee Davison
Mr Hugo DuPlessis Dr Paula Giliker Mr Brian Williamson Capt Gopalkrishna Khanna Cdr Terry Lilley
Capt Syed Khalid Humail Capt Ian Wilkins Capt Jens Andersen Mr Ian Nicolson Capt M P Karanjia
Mr Jorge Sanidos Capt J.C. Anand Mr John Guy Capt Rodger MacDonald Mr Uday Moorthi
Dr David Lawrence Mr Anthony Beck Capt David Linacre Capt William MacDonald Mr Ian Biles
Dr Satish Agnihotri Capt Andrew Cross Capt Jean Paul Le Coz Ms Evie Kinane
Rescuers located the uninflated liferaft and beside it found the skipper and one crewman unresponsive and face
down in the water, despite wearing approved abandonment lifejackets.
The MAIB investigation included salvaging the wreck to determine the cause of flooding, inspection and testing
of the liferaft, lifejacket trials and testing, and a review of the search and rescue response. The Maritime and
Coastguard Agency has since taken action to enhance its guidance in respect of liferaft servicing requirements.
The circumstances of this accident, and subsequent trials and testing undertaken, have raised concerns about
the effectiveness of the lifejackets worn by Louisa’s skipper and crew. Recommendations have been made to
Louisa’s owners regarding vessel maintenance, safety equipment servicing and risk assessments, and to the
liferaft servicing company and its sub-contractor in respect of work processes.
The UK’s Maritime & Coastguard Agency (MCA) is modernising the way the UK Ship Register operates with a number
of new initiatives being rolled out as the Agency is also addressing the issue of a shortfall in surveyors on its books.
The suggestion that the MCA could become a GovCo – a privately held state-owned company that is subject to
government oversight but with greater commercial freedom – was argued as currently unnecessary, especially
as the transition would take between three and five years, while Brexit will continue to parliamentary schedule
until at least 2019.
ENaval architect Greg Marshall predicts the technology for 3D printed yachts and superyachts could be available
by 2030. Entire superyachts and their interiors could be created by 3D printers, using more efficient materials for
stronger and more affordable designs.
3D printing’s benefits include fewer parts, less labour, less stock, and less lead time. Furthermore, with the
help of enhanced materials such as titanium, 3D printing creates drastically less waste compared to current
construction technologies.
During a presentation at the 2017 Superyacht Design Symposium, Marshall said “Additive manufacturing
is changing the playing field. In the very near future, we will be using it to build superior yachts that have
significant material reductions and much smaller carbon footprints”.
He continued, “Typically in a shipyard, you see about 15 to 20 percent raw material wastage. With 3D printing, it’s
around 2 percent, so it’s a huge savings in material, a huge savings in labour.”
Beneteau announces details about the new generation of Oceanis sailing yachts
The furling mast, self-tailing jib and all the halyards and sheets on the standard model are brought back to a single
winch at each of the helm stations. The vessel is also fitted with Dock & Go technology to simplify manoeuvring.
Constitution is expected to continue post-docking restoration work before re-opening to the public in early
September. While she is ordinarily at the pier at the USS Constitution Museum in Boston, her commanding officer,
Cmdr. Robert Gerosa, says that at some point she will be seen under way under her own power once more.
The world’s first fully electric air Record-breaking heavy lift five years in
supported vessel picks up the award preparation but just ten seconds
to execute
BB Green, the world’s first fully electric air
supported vessel by Green City Ferries has been
awarded the ‘electric and hybrid propulsion system
of the year’ at the Electric & Hybrid Marine World
Expo Conference 2017 in the Netherlands.
On 3 August 2017, the new Recreational Craft Regulations 2017 finally joined the statute book and became law after
much deliberation. This legislation is more generally known as the RCD, or Recreational Craft Directive (2013/53/EU)
and this version updates and repeals the earlier 2004 regulations.
The 2017 regulations follow the requirements of the RCD, while also setting out the UK market surveillance
responsibilities. This essentially relates to what trading standards can and will do to ensure compliance. Their powers
to impose penalties on companies found in breach of the regulations are immense and could result in products
being taken off the market, fines imposed and even imprisonment in some cases.
The RCD sets out minimum technical, safety and environmental standards for the trade of boats, personal watercraft,
marine engines and components in Europe. It covers boats between 2.5 metres and 24 metres. It ensures their
suitability for sale and use in Europe.
Some of the key changes to essential requirements include: Annex I.A.5.1.6. – Deletion of mandatory tank ventilation for all tanks
applicable only to petrol fuel tank spaces
Annex I.A.2.3. Protection from falling overboard and means of re-
boarding – means of re-boarding shall be accessible to, Annex I.A.5.3. Electrical system – changes addressing electric propulsion
or deployable by a person in the water unaided.
Annex I.A.5.5. Gas system – appliance requirement of flame failure
Annex I.A.2.4 Visibility from the main steering position now applicable deleted (covered by gas appliance directive)
to all craft (changed to include sailing vessels)
Annex I.5.8. – Water protection – holding tank / treatment
Annex I.A.3.3. Buoyancy and flotation/3.8 Escape – new wording system requirement
introducing stability assessment for multihulls
Annex I.B – New engine emission limits – alignment with EPA 2010/
Annex I.A.5.1.6. – Kill cord requirement for tiller steered OB engines CARB including test cycles and test fuels
Measure metal thickness through coatings and GRP with one gauge!
The New Multigauge 5650 Surveyor Thickness Gauge has
been designed specifically for ship and small craft surveyors. NEW
The user has a choice of Multiple Echo, Echo to Echo or Single
Echo to cover all requirements when inspecting steel or GRP
vessels. The gauge automatically switches modes and settings
depending on the type of probe fitted.
“What a marine surveyor needs to know about...” include the titles: Marine Surveying - An Introduction | Imaging Techniques
Small Craft Metal Hulls and Ultrasonics | Working In Enclosed Spaces | Surveying Wood Craft | Small Craft, Ship and Boat-Building Terminology
Yacht and Small Craft Report Writing | Knowledge Management | Dynamicaly Positioned Vessels | Business Management Skills
Small Craft and Superyacht Valuations | Small Craft Engine Surveys | Surveying Metal Craft
In the field of knowledge management, the concept • Capture the Knowledge: Capture what is being
of tacit knowledge refers to a knowledge which presented using notes, diagrams and multimedia.
cannot be fully codified (written down or encoded).
Therefore, an individual cannot acquire tacit • Synthesize and Formalise the Knowledge: Share
knowledge simply by reading printed matter or and discuss the knowledge and ideas collected
Googling, you need to be exposed to the experiences with colleagues and filter out what’s most useful.
and wisdom of the subject matter expert.
• Capture and share: Have a plan for how you will
With tacit knowledge, people are often not aware internalise the useful ideas, insights, statistics and
of the knowledge they possess or how it can case studies and share these with your colleagues
be valuable to others. Effective transfer of tacit and clients. Specific learnings can be saved in
knowledge generally requires personal contact, your personal knowledge base.
interaction and trust. This kind of knowledge can
only be revealed through practice in a particular The IIMS enables knowledge sharing through
context (transmitted through social networking) or seminars, conferences and YouTube video sessions
by sharing ideas and experiences through seminars, which are all sources of the most valuable from
conferences and video presentations. To some of knowledge (tacit knowledge). IIMS members
extent it is “captured” when the knowledge holder should take advantage these rich offerings to build
joins a network or a community of practice. knowledge, skill and capability.
Vice President, Capt Zarir Irani and Allen Brink stepped in for IIMS
CEO, Mike Schwarz, to receive the award.
News has reached IIMS headquarters that IIMS member, Engr. Emeraku Ijioma, who is also
Chairman of the Institute’s Nigeria Branch, has been inducted as a Fellow of the Nigerian
Academy of Engineering on 6th July, 2017. He is the first Naval Architect/Marine Engineer in
Nigeria to be inducted into the Academy. Admittance is by invitation based on the recognition
of an individual’s professional contributions and achievements. It is heart-warming that it came
to a member of the IIMS family. We salute you for your achievements Engr. Emeraku Ijioma.
Paul Bournas, Managing Director of CCS says, “Jan has so much passion for paint and superyachts. He is a
professional in heart and soul. He is a great consultant with a huge knowledge of paint and defects.”
Jan officially retires in April 2018 when it’s time for other things, especially spending time with his family.
IIMS has just released three new handy guides for sale on the subject of insurance damage surveys. The series
of ‘What a marine surveyor needs to know about’ now boasts sixteen titles in total following the launch of these
new handy guides, all of which have been written by the doyen of marine surveyors, Capt Barry Thompson.
Although there is a common theme running through the series of the handy guides, each is bespoke
for different parts of the sector. But as Barry Thompson himself says, “If a surveyor receives a request to
carry out an insurance claim survey, its purpose is still fundamentally the same as with most surveys – to
investigate and provide the facts relating to the incident and then report his findings. In his enquiries he
uses his knowledge and experience to consider the facts and evaluate them to assist in establishing the
cause and to determine the best means of minimising the loss.”
The three handy guides are priced at £20 each plus post and packing and are available directly from the IIMS web
site. For details of how to purchase one or more of these guides, or other titles in the ‘What a marine surveyor
needs to know about’ series, click here: https://www.iims.org.uk/education/buy-iims-handy-guides/
IIMS Certifying Authority autumn training and notes to enable a WB2 form to be
day tackles workboat coding completed on the second day
12.45 Lunch break
The IIMS Certifying Authority has put together 13.45 Regroup to continue coding survey – groups
what promises to be an informative and valuable to switch between Mike and Fraser at an
two day programme on 20/21 November 2017. The appropriate time
programme is relevant to coding surveyors who 16.30 Close for the day
currently survey workboats, but is equally likely to 19.00 Group dinner for those who want to join at a
appeal to those wanting more knowledge in this local venue
crucial and growing area. This event is a mix of hands
on surveying coupled with classroom based training Tuesday 21 November
with informative presentations to conclude day two. Classroom based training will take place at Dartside
Quay, unless numbers are beyond OTSs capacity, in
IIMS is especially grateful to Mike Proudlove MIIMS which case a nearby venue will be booked for the
(and his colleagues), who have agreed to host this second day.
special workboat themed training event at his place
of work, Offshore Turbine Services Ltd (OTS). The 09.00 Work in small groups (depending on
OTS yard is located at 3 Maypool Building, Dartside numbers) to compile the WB2 form
Quay, Galmpton, Nr Brixham TQ5 0GD. OTS operates followed by coming together as one
a fleet of fast, versatile vessels that transport group to go through the completed
technicians, cargo and fuel to offshore work sites forms, highlighting areas of disagreement,
and installations. Their Integrated Management followed by discussion and agreement
System ensures quality, safety and the protection of 12.45 Lunch
the environment in all that they do. OTS is ISO 9001 13.45 Continuation of WB2 form work
and ISM Code accredited. 15.00 Speaker 1: SAN 75 – Dangerous Goods
and Fuel Transfer
Mike and his team have arranged to have one of 15.45 Speaker 2: Hydraulic pumps and crane
their fast crew transfer vessels from their fleet out of installation. Crane inspection and related
water in readiness, so that delegates can undertake stability.
a mock coding survey, before completing the WB2 16.30 Close
form required to gain MCA code compliance on day
two. Mike and Fraser Noble will host and monitor The cost of attendance for both days in person is
the two working groups on the first day. £190 to include lunch on both days. Dinner and
accommodation is at own cost. The second day
The agenda, which is subject to change, is as follows: only will be available to view online at a cost of £95
via zoom online conferencing. 5 CPD points are
Monday 20 November awarded to those who attend and 3 points for those
10.00 Meet up at Dartside Quay for initial briefing who join online.
10.15 Split into two groups (depending on
numbers) to start the coding survey on the To reserve your place either Tania Bernice at ca@
vessel compiling the necessary information iims.org.uk or call her on + 44 (0) 23 9238 5223.
Launched in February 2017, the IIMS Continuing Professional Development (CPD) App has just notched up its 1,000th
claim for points from members. Over 300 individuals have used the CPD App since its inception with more than 100
IIMS members having now accrued their required 10 points for the year.
But as IIMS Chief Executive Officer, Mike Schwarz, says, “We still have work to do to engage with the hundreds of
members who have yet to try the CPD App and to claim their points. With technology constantly changing and new
skills being required, it is vitally important that IIMS members continue to keep themselves current in the market place.
The CPD App helps to do that.”
The innovative CPD App was developed by IIMS member, Capt Ruchin Dayal of eDot Solutions, and his Goa based
programming colleagues. There are versions for the iOS, Android and web based platforms. The App is quick and
easy to use, praised by many members who have used it to date it for its effectiveness and simplicity. Aesthetic
modifications and new functions were added to Version 2, which was released in June.
At the recent London Conference Dinner, Michelle Fernandes and Richard Fernandes, the key architects and
programmers on this innovative project were recognised by IIMS Chief Executive Officer, when he presented a framed
certificate to each of them.
The IIMS Management Board spent some time earlier this year considering how to
reward those members who successfully complete and acquire their 10 points for
this calendar year to keep their Continuing Professional Development up to date.
Remember, the system changed back in January from a three-year cycle to a one
year calendar cycle. Points are now claimed by using the CPD App either in iOS,
Android or web based versions.
The reward is the addition of a special CPD Compliant roundel, which will be applied to
the IIMS web page listings of those members who qualify with effect from January 2018.
You have until 31 March 2018 to claim your points for this year via the App to qualify.
Mike Schwarz
Commander
Graham Hockley
First to speak in the Tuke Common Room was Capt Zarir Irani, who had stepped up to fill this speaker
slot at short notice. His topic this time? “Facts not Assumptions” – an independent surveyor’s report,
the content of which proved to be self-explanatory and was well delivered.
Mike Proudlove gave a powerful and authoritative presentation on the subject of the challenges
faced when surveying one of the latest generations of wind farm fast crew transfer vessels. These
complex vessels demand careful inspection and Mike gave a detailed insight into how to approach it.
Mike Proudlove
Peter Solvang, an
accredited eCMID
vessel inspector and
something of a specialist
in dynamic positioning,
gave a comprehensive
introduction to another
specialised area of
the marine surveying
profession. He introduced
the different types of DP
vessels to delegates and
with clarity told them
the sort of questions that
should be asked and
what to look for when
surveying a vessel fitted
with a DP system.
the perils of
undertaking valuations
As most of you will be aware, 15 months passed by and the When the surveyor argued this
it’s standard practice to owner of the vessel, for which they point, citing that the insurance
issue valuations either as had paid £34k, decided to follow company had agreed that there was
standalone documents or as the surveyor’s recommendation no basis for a claim he was informed
part of a survey report. and have the boat shot blasted that it was in fact the valuation that
and painted. After extensive shot had been the issue despite having
We have long been under the blasting, it was discovered that been just the surveyor’s “opinion”.
impression that if we as a surveyor the vessel had more significant
issue a letter of opinion that pitting than was first thought. As a result of this revelation the
we are protected from claims The owner initiated a claim surveyor contacted a barrister to
as a result of discrepancies or against the surveyor for negligent find out if this was correct and,
unseen circumstances. However, misstatement. The surveyor in indeed, why so. The barrister’s
it would appear that this belief is question immediately notified response was as follows, “A person
misplaced and this will have far his own insurance company and or business can be sued in respect
reaching consequences among the sent them a copy of the report. of the provision of any professional
surveying profession. After detailed inspection it was services as the surveyor would
decided that the surveyor had have owed a duty of care to the
Allow me to explain the situation. adequately covered himself in his client. There is no immunity when
report, having noted the pitting providing valuations subject to the
A survey was carried out on a and included sufficient caveats to surveyor’s terms of business.”
narrowboat, during which some protect himself. Further to this, it
pitting was noted and subsequently was confirmed by the yard that Obviously, this response means
reported on and that the base there had been so many coats of that the surveyor’s insurance would
plate was very rough and it was paint on the hull that it would have indeed have to settle the difference
nigh on impossible to ascertain its been impossible for the surveyor in the values less the surveyor’s
condition; but it was also stated to ascertain the extent of pitting deductible. This is something that all
that the surveyor could not see the beneath them. surveyors should be made aware of.
whole surface of the boat unless
it had been shot blasted (standard The insurance company’s surveyor
caveat) as there may, or may not then inspected the vessel and
have been further pitting behind decided that a value of £10k was
the coatings. It was recommended now appropriate due to the current
that the vessel be shot blasted and condition of the hull and that it
the hull checked within 18 months. would be in the surveyor’s interest
The purchaser was happy with the to settle the claim as quickly as
survey report and agreed to pay possible to prevent a build of costs.
GBP £34k (an asking price of GBP
£37k was believed to have been
quoted) on the basis of the opinion
given by the surveyor. BY Elliott Berry MIIMS
James
On a daily basis, the offshore wind
sector can operate a wide range
of differing vessels, jack ups and
barges across its operations. This
activity takes place during the
Fisher
initial installation and continues
with power generation over the
life cycle of the individual wind
farm. This life cycle is around 5
years from planning to installation
offshore followed by a further 20
to 25 years from installation for
power generation before the final
decommissioning. Each area of
the offshore wind farm life cycle
operation has its unique marine
and logistical requirements
supported by a wide range of
associated vessel types and
supporting technologies. These
offshore vessels have many and
various technical complexities. In
most cases within the wind sector
they have had to be developed to
address specific marine challenges
and are therefore at the forefront
of new technologies within the
sector. Marine vessels have also
required greater development to
Photo reproduced with kind permission of James Fisher & Sons UK (Marine Services Worldwide) address larger and greater numbers
of wind turbines being installed
NearNear
hits 62
hits%62 % Transfer by vessel
Transfer 43 %43 %
by vessel
Hazards 15 % Maritime operations 31 %
First aid
First7aid
%7 % Vessel mobilisation
Vessel 3%3%
mobilisation
Near hits 62 % Transfer by vessel 43 %
Medical tr eatment
Medical injuries
tr eatment 8 %8 %
injuries Vessel operation
Vessel 23 %23 %
operation
First aid 7 % Vessel mobilisation 3 %
Restricted workwork
Restricted days days
2% 2%
Medical tr eatment injuries 8 % Vessel operation 23 %
Marine operations
Marine – incident
operations consequence
– incident consequence Marine operations
Marine - work
operations process
- work breakdown
process breakdown
150 Marine
150
operations – incident consequence Marine operations - work process breakdown
Ke y Ke y
150
150 150 Ay
Ke Access ladders
A Access ladders
Ke y Ke y
150 B
A Administration
Access
B ladders
Administration
120 120 Ke y
A AccessAccess
ladders
B A Administration
C Boatlanding
ladders
C Boatlanding
120 A Access ladders
B Administration
D B Boatlanding
C CarAdministration
D parkCar park
120 120 B Administration
120 C D Boatlanding
E C Car Boatlanding
park
Excavations
E and civil
Excavations andworks
civil works
90 90 C E Boatlanding
Excavations and civil works
90 D F Car park
D Foundation
F CarFoundation
park externalexternal
D F Car park
Foundation external
E GExcavations
E Harbour, and civil
GExcavations
quay
Harbour, andworks
and civil works
pontoons
90 E G Excavations and civil quay
worksand pontoons
Harbour, quay and pontoons
90 90 FF HHFoundation
Hub and
Foundation blades
external
HFoundation
F Hub andHub and blades
blades
external external
60 60 60
G I Harbour,
Nacelle
I Harbour,
G Nacelle Nacelle
quay and
quaypontoons
and pontoons
G I Harbour, quay and pontoons
H JJ Hub
Hub Office
Jand
H Office
andHub Office
blades
and blades
blades
60 60 60 KK Other
Other
K Other
30 I Nacelle
Nacelle
I Nacelle
30 30 LL Staircase
Staircase
Staircase
JJ OfficeL
Office
M J
StorageOffice
K MOther
Storage
M Storage
K N Other
K Substation
Other work and cable areas
30 Substation
NStaircase work and
N Substation workcable
and areas
cable areas
30 30 0 L
0 0 L O Staircase
L Transition piece area
Staircase
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S Transition
M POStorage piece piece
O Transition area area
A AB BC CD DE EF FG GH HI IJ JK KL LM MN NO OP PQ QR RS Turbine tower
SM Storage
M Turbine
P Storage
N QPSubstation tower
Turbine
work andtower
Turbine/substation cable areas
outside
0 N QSubstation work work
QSubstation
N Turbine/substationand cable areas areas
and cable
outside
Turbine/substation outside
O R Transition
Vessels piece
– largearea
(>24 m)
0 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S
O Transition
Vessels– piece
R Transition
O Vessels
P SRTurbine tower– large
Vessels
small –area
piecem)area
(>24
(<24largem)
(>24 m)
A AB BC CD DE EF FG GH HI IJ JK KL LM MN NO OP PQ QR RS S
PQ STurbine/substation
Turbine
P Vesselstower
S Turbine tower
– small
Vessels (<24
smallm)
–outside (<24 m)
MarineKey
operations – incident area breakdown
Q
R Turbine/substation
Vessels – large (>24 m)outside
Q Turbine/substation outside
Marine operations
Marine – incident
operations areaarea
– incident breakdown
breakdown
Key Key Data and charts reproduced with kind permission
R
of The
Vessels
R
Energy Institute,
– large– large
Vessels (>24 m)
(>24 m)
London. UK.
to continue. It was agreed that the other agencies and organisations. has returned to the process of
number of notified incidents across It was accepted that an overview identifying specific vessel types
the wind sector was detrimental of all these activities was necessary in appendices and identifying the
to all stakeholders and very to assess that the appropriate additional verifications required on
undesirable for all concerned. standards continued to be met and that vessel type. This is a welcome
achieved. This was also required development and can only enhance
by many insurers of these offshore the quality of the IMCA inspection
The Role of Marine inspection – ventures, quite often as part of process long term. It was also
Vessel vetting process the marine warranty process, to recognized that there were a
confirm that vessels continued to number of much smaller vessels
Marine operations and the be operated safely and effectively. or workboats as they are more
offshore logistical functions commonly referred. The CMID
were recognised as holding a This verification or “vetting” inspection document was intended
critical role within this company’s process is certainly not new and more for larger vessels and contains
offshore wind farm operations. It not a unique innovation of the many requirements not needed by
was already well understood that wind sector. The process has been the smaller vessels. The provision
early intervention with proper well developed in the oil and gas of the Marine Inspection for Small
and thorough vessel inspection Industry mainly through IMCA Workboats (MISW – IMCA M189)
assisted the identification of (International Maritime Contractors document last issued in June 2016
potential causes of incidents and Association). This process was at revision 3 was developed to
allowed corrective and preventative completed using the standard address this very important area of
measures to be applied at an early inspection document Common offshore marine operations.
stage. Vessels operating in the Marine Inspection Document
offshore sector already received (CMID- IMCA M 149) which has Within this company both
all certification and inspections evolved over a number of years inspection documents were
required by classification societies and is now at Issue 10 released generally completed but were
and Flag states as well as various in July 2016. This latest version not fully utilised; however, the
Photo reproduced with kind permission of Aluminium Boats Ltd. E. Cowes. Isle of Wight UK & Sue Stevens Media, Ashurst UK
develop internally with recognition internally that as a result of the new Accredited Vessel Inspector’s (AVIs).
that there were concerns across technology and vessel innovations These inspectors are expected to
the sector that there was no formal the inspectors would need to demonstrate their knowledge,
approval requirement for the become more specialised for experience and competency to
selected IMCA vessel inspectors. specific vessel types. an independent approval body to
This company carefully identified An approval system developed achieve the accreditation to complete
who would complete these a few years ago and operated by IMCA inspections on specific vessel
inspections on our behalf, but the Oil Contractors International types. The International Institute
commonly inspectors would be Maritime Forum (OCIMF) created of Marine Surveying (IIMS) was
provided under the umbrella of the Offshore Vessels inspection approached to oversee and manage
a reputable offshore consultancy document (OVID). The system the approval process and following
with a clear demonstrable ensured a quality process with submission of the above information
inspection track record. inspectors approved to a common combined with some inspection
standard and trained to complete training, now approve Accredited
IMCA understood the system was the inspection to a specific set of Vessel Inspectors (AVIs). Accreditation
working, but also realised that it criteria. This process was at the is given for the specific vessel types
was necessary to ensure that the time available only to oil companies considered competent and the
vessel inspectors were approved to who had initially extended a inspector is subsequently issued with
maintain the respect and integrity concern regarding standards of a unique number which is used on all
of the IMCA inspection process. An inspectors and the approval process inspection documents completed.
inspector, having demonstrated in the offshore sectors.
capability and also suitable This is a significant step and
knowledge and experience, could improvement in quality as Vattenfall
be approved to undertake the IMCA and AVI’s – as a company can now clearly
inspection. A more formal Inspector Accredited Vessel Inspectors see who is an approved inspector
assessment process was required and what vessels types can be
and was identified as desirable by Over the last few years IMCA has inspected. The step change to a
various groups across the offshore engaged fully in a similar process measurable standard for inspectors
energy sector. It was also identified with the creation of a new group of is recognised as an approach to
Further information
IMCA rebranded CMID to eCMID in mid 2017. At the time of writing, around 300 vessel inspectors have
become accredited through the scheme. Anyone who believes they have the right skills and competency
to become accredited as a vessel inspector/auditor, or who simply wants to have more knowledge
about the AVI scheme and how it operates is encouraged to look at the eCMID web site to
www.ecmidvesselinspectors.com for further details and information.
Master P
However, while exciting new
vessel types have emerged which
are dedicated to building and
maintaining wind farms, there
are also many more conventional
dredgers, tugs, workboats,
multi-cats, barges and even RIBs
involved in the construction
and maintenance of offshore
wind farms. The sheer number of
operators, vessels and vessel types
involved in the industry provides
opportunities for surveyors from all
Photo courtesy of Offshore Turbine Services types of backgrounds.
Cardinal P
six industrial personnel. The new
HS-OSC Code is an extension of the
Special Purpose Ships Code2 and
was written with the wind farm
industry firmly in mind.
Admiral P
With small vessels operating a long
way from their home port, some
intermediate surveys are inevitably
undertaken by local surveyors
3
Common Marine Inspection Document.
IMCA M 189 is applicable for crew transfer
vessels and other vessels under 24 metres.
to metal surfaces (Steel 4.5 N/ Wencon 1020/1030 White and as a repair/rebuild solution, with a
sq.mm. 652 psi) and a quick curing Blue Coatings with Hardness very strong bond, for example to
repair that can be massaged into Shore D 80, Tensile Strength steel of 30.80 N/sq.mm. (4,466 psi),
place by hand, excellent for the 12.9 N/sq.mm (1,870 psi) and it is therefore extremely effective
sealing and filling of leaks or cracks. Compressive strength 2,199N/ when rebuilding extensively
sq.mm. (318,855 psi). These two- damaged areas that need non-
The versatile 1010 Cream Repair, component, double-coat, solvent- conductive protection, resistant to
Hardness Shore D 75 DIN 53505, free coatings protect against 300ºC, from bi-metallic corrosion,
Tensile strength 14.3 N/sq.mm. erosion/corrosion, cavitation and abrasion, erosion/corrosion and
[2,073 psi] has strong adhesion to bi-metallic corrosion on surfaces cavitation due to a very hard,
metals, for example Steel adhesion in oil, water and salt water tanks, smooth, non-porous finish, with
14.40 N/sq.mm. [2,088 psi], and is pump housings, salt-water filter Compressive strength 2,799 N/
an excellent non-porous erosion/ housings, valves and cooler-end sq.mm. (405,855 psi).
corrosion resistant repair solution for covers as a few examples. They are
worn, corroded, or cracked; tanks, practical and cost effective due to The versatile 1017/1018 Ceramic
pump housings, shafts, flange faces, the excellent coverage rate of 1kg Coatings with Hardness Shore D
roller bearing seats, hydraulic rams per sq.m. at 600 microns. 81, Tensile Strength 25.4 N/sq.mm
and many more examples. Excellent (3,683 psi), are available in Brown
for rebuilding threaded metalwork The Wencon 1016 Ceramic and Green and offer a protective
with Modulus of Elasticity 1,689 N/ Cream Repair with Shore D coating Temperature resistant to
sq.mm. (24,490 psi). Hardness : 80 (DIN 53505), is an 320ºC. Ceramic Coatings have a
excellent solvent-free rebuild very strong bond [Adhesion to
Cream Repair is machinable and paste, with Abrasion Resistance steel is 28.90 N/sq.mm. (4,190 psi)]
heat resistant to 250ºC, as are (Taber wear test) 25.6 (ISO 7784-1) and is very tough, Compressive
the standard protective products that allows protection when used Strength 3,030 N/sq.mm. (439,350
We offer our full-service delivery in UK, Europe and Far East through
our extensive Consultancy network:
• Marine Project Management
• Newbuilds, Ship Repair, Conversions
• Plan Approval
• Vendor Selection and Auditing
• Specification review and advice
• Site Team selection and recruitment
• Condition surveys
• Pre-purchase surveys
• Expert witness
• HSE and Risk Management
• Specialist marine training courses
The
The Report
Report •• September 2017 •• Issue
September 2017 81 | 49
Issue 81
Does this really happen, I hear you rescue procedure. It is my belief, solution will present itself and all
say, the answer is yes, how else that to date, the problem of will be well in the end. Alas, we live
can tanks be inspected/surveyed submerged or semi-submerged in the real world, and it is a true
whilst the ship is in ballast. rescue from enclosed spaces has adage that if we fail to prepare
not yet been addressed. This adequately for such situations
Regrettably, commercial diving, is probably because there is no in advance then we have to be
by its very nature is extremely perceived solution to the problem prepared to fail. Except in these
hazardous and presents its own and it’s best to leave things situations failing to prepare could
unique set of circumstances, alone, put to one side, and in any have a catastrophic outcome and
especially when considering how case, should the occasion ever end with divers losing their lives.
to undertake a safe entry and arise where rescue is required, a
In formulas 1 and 2 the volume fractions of the components are used, indicated with the symbol ‘v’.
250
200
Bending strength (MPa)
150
50
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
For the production of the camp sheeting profiles a combination of sawn strips and shredded flakes was used as reinforcing
elements. In total 80 profiles of 3.5 meter length were made using vacuum-assisted infusion under foil using steel moulds.
At the Beatrix lock-gate in Almere, The Netherlands the 80 profiles were used References
to install a camp sheeting. The placement process, vibrating the profiles into
the soil with a hammer block was experienced by the crane operator to be as [1] Update on Recycling
easy as with the traditional profiles made of tropical hard wood. ACMA Global Composite Recycling Workshop
Paris, March 7, 2016.
[5] S. Halliwell
Fibre Reinforced Polymers in Construction:
Durability
BRE Report IP10/03, September 2003
ISBN 1 86081 635 5
products and building products. After his study and promotion on composite mechanics at the Technical University
in Delft he worked at PPG Fiber Glass Industries as manager of the application laboratory. After this, he directed the
wood building product department at SHR Wood Research and worked as R&D manager on wood-polymer composites
at Tech-Wood. Since 2005 he is Technical Director of Poly Products in Werkendam. In this company various composite
products are developed, produced and installed for which Albert has the technical responsibility. One of the successes
has been de CSC-certification of the Cargoshell composite container for which he has been the project leader.
Moreover, Albert was chairman of the Dutch composites association CompositesNL for eight years. Since 2015 Albert
has become associate professor on composites at the University of Applied Sciences Windesheim, The Netherlands.
Early
engagement
with insurers,
legal
representation,
technical
survey experts,
and crew The likely total time for all repairs often include costs relating to
to the containership is 30 days. repairs that did not arise from the
are vital By contrast, it is determined that
collision. Any contemporaneous
expert evidence that shows the
components the chemical tanker can be repaired
quickly, in as little as two days.
actual damage resulting from
this incident alone may prove to
in the Assuming that the chemical tanker
be a valuable tool for ultimately
reducing the opponent’s claim.
belongs to our client, here are
management some of the considerations to
which we attach the greatest
The surveyor may also be
instructed to conduct a separate
of collision importance. They are presented
in no particular order.
“speed and angle of blow” survey,
which will attempt to provide
cases. SURVEYS
preliminary answers on the course
and velocity of both vessels in
the moments before impact.
In the aftermath of this Again, such data is not intended
significant collision, hull insurers to decide on issues of liability,
will want to appoint a surveyor. but will be an aide in the discussion
Predominantly, the surveyor’s process between both sides.
role will be to assess the damage
Ideally, the surveyor should
to our client’s vessel, advise on
maintain contact with the
options for repair, and report on
containership owners and seek
the facts leading to the collision.
an invitation to any repairs they
The surveyor would not be expected
carry out. Again, this is to ensure
to offer an opinion as to which
that the repair costs (which form
vessel is more or less liable,
part of the opponent claim)
or to speculate on the causes of the
relate solely to the collision.
collision, particularly when such
commentary would be unsupported There is no obligation on the
by evidence at such an early stage. opponent to allow anyone access
to their vessel; however, more often
The surveyor may also be called
than not, ship-owners and their
upon to perform a “without
insurer interests will
prejudice” survey on the
co-operate in an effort to maintain
containership. This will provide
professional and amicable
an insight into the damages
discourse with one another.
sustained by the collision
“opponents”. It is an unfortunate
fact that opponent claims can
But the figure should at least have a And, for every action which our LIMITATION
sense of realistic endeavour about client takes in securing their
it and reflect the likely full amount losses, the same reaction can In our example, we can see that
of our client’s damages, plus an be expected from the owners of the losses of the containership are
appropriate margin for error. the containership. They too will likely to be quite large. As such,
It should be remembered that want to ensure they have the there may be an opportunity for
a letter of security is simply protection of security and that our client to limit their liability
a mechanism by which the it is in a form and of financial under the applicable Convention
opponent insurers can demonstrate standing acceptable to opponents. of Limitation of Liability for
future payment of properly
Generally speaking, hull insurers Maritime Claims.
proven losses up to an agreed
sum, and is not a promise to pay for marine collision liabilities A successful limitation action
a fixed sum without question. are not under an obligation to effectively caps the maximum
provide security. More often than amount that a valid entity, such
The lawyer should advise the client not they will assist the client, as a ship-owner, ship manager,
whether the offer of security from but, again, much will depend on or charterer and their insurers
the containership interests is fit for who the hull insurers are and will have to pay to an opponent
purpose. Among other things, they what the insurance policy says. following a collision. The ability
will need to consider the following:
to limit is dependent on several
• Is the guarantee provider
JURISDICTION criteria, including:
financially secure?
A competent maritime lawyer • The type of vessel.
• Is the security correctly should also advise the client on
• The vessel’s tonnage.
worded and conforms to issues of jurisdiction. At the time
known standards? when parties in a collision are • The type of claim.
agreeing on the form of security
• Is the quantum of guarantee to exchange with one another, As one might expect, this is a
sufficient to meet the they should also be determining hugely complicated area and
assured’s global losses which jurisdiction will apply in the one which we could devote an
arising from the collision? event that they cannot ultimately entire adviser to. Suffice to say
resolve the claims between them that, if this is a valid avenue
If it does not bear scrutiny, amicably and the matter must of enquiry, we would expect
the lawyer may recommend proceed to trial or arbitration. lawyers to offer advice on
that security should be obtained
the feasibility of instituting a
in an alternative form, such as
limitation fund as part of their
a bank or cash guarantee.
overall suite of guidance.
The information contained herein is based on sources we believe reliable and should be understood to be general risk management and insurance
information only. The information is not intended to be taken as advice with respect to any individual situation and cannot be relied upon as such.
In the United Kingdom, Marsh Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Marsh Ltd, trading as Marsh Ireland is authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK and is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland for conduct
of business rules.
Copyright © 2017 Marsh Ltd. All rights reserved. GRAPHICS NO. 17-0636
In the photograph above, a small sample on the actual pile to be for both TML and MC tests, these
stockpile was formed against a loaded, within 10 days before represent the stockpile as a whole.
glass plate in our laboratory; it was loading. Due to the inhomogeneity, But different parts of the stockpile
built using a well mixed stream of these two separate samples will could be quite different in size, and
salt (white particles mostly 2-3mm have different size gradings, and loaded into different holds. It’s not
diameter) and mung beans (brown potentially very different behaviour, uncommon to find cargo liquefies
material about 6mm diameter). But so the measured TML can relate in only one hold and is secure in the
as the stockpile forms, the larger to material with a very different others – which may be partly due
particles roll more readily down the behaviour from the MC sample. to this.
rough surface of the heap, so they The limited data we have been
finish up at the bottom and outside, able to get on the variation in The need for awareness
whereas the fine particles do not both values measured through and quantification of
roll so well, hence accumulating a stockpile, has shown changes heterogeneity
more in the middle. Most real much bigger than specified “safety This matter of bulk heterogeneity,
materials have a wider size range margin” between MC and FMP. sampling errors and the meaning
than these two materials, so it is Basically the value of any such of data from samples, has long
obvious that most real stockpiles sample, and any comfort drawn been of great importance to us at
will be highly segregated internally. on it in relation to the safety of the The Wolfson Centre because we
There are special methods for ship and crew, may in many cases do a lot of work in cargo quality.
building stockpiles in a way that be simply an illusion. However, there seems to have been
minimises the separation, but we no consideration of what it means
have never seen this done at a port. The only way to get a truly for the IMO protocol for group A
representative sample of a stockpile cargoes. When the sampling error
Taking a sample from a large pile is to sample the stream that it is bigger than the specified margin
segregated like this, is impossible. is built from, over its full width, of safety, which it has been in
Even if you try to dig into it, you many times through the entire cases we have analysed, safety is
can’t go in far enough to get to the stacking operation, preferably with seriously compromised.
centre; and it is the centre where a mechanical sampler. In a few
the material is finest, often wettest, industries this is done routinely For raw ores like nickel ore, the
and therefore most dangerous from (the guide “Recommended Best danger of large sampling errors is
a liquefaction perspective. Take a Practices for the Sampling of Dry worse because the material is more
sample from the outside and it will Bulk Fertilizer Shipments” by the likely to vary from different parts
be coarser, more free draining and International Fertilizer Industry of the pit, and has a wider range
therefore usually drier. Also bear Association is a good guide to of sizes and moisture contents;
in mind that according to the IMO proper procedure) but for ores and whereas for processed materials
protocol, the TML is determined coals this is almost never done due (even separated fine iron ore) there
from a Flow Moisture Point (FMP) to the cost, time and difficulty. is a degree of “standardising” that
test on a sample and is valid for 6 goes on in processing the cargo,
months for the same cargo flow, Also, it must be recognised that so the FMP will vary less. However
whereas the MC is taken from a even if true samples are obtained both the MC and FMP will still
s – “ If I we r e K ing”:
eyor ’s th o u g h t
Sur v
r v e y in g is ju s t the thing
Now su w ondering;
ts a fe ll o w
Which ge r y lo ts about
r s w o r
And sur veyo w it h o u t clout.
e y a r e
The fact that th ly I w ere King!
k If o n
Some thin “
o a n y thing!
c o u ld d
Then no one s a y I’m wrong
e g r ie f o r
To cause m e b e e n stung.”
c r y I’ v
To claim or ll y isn’t fair
u g h t: “ It r e a
He tho a ll y d o es care.”
when h e r e
To judge him
AA Eeyore
“.. if in a sphere where a person The Contract – Its Importance – If you wish to apply a clause you
is so placed that others could when is it formed? have to have had it incorporated
reasonably rely on his judgement Importance of incorporation into a contract before acceptance
or on his skill or on his ability – too late if put in the report – but
to make careful enquiry, such If you are going to undertake a don’t fall foul of misunderstanding
person takes it on himself to give condition survey and a valuation the difference between a contractual
information or advice to, or allow survey, check and ensure your clause and a caveat in a report:
his information or advice to be contract with your client covers
passed on to another person who, (states) both activities – condition Example in a contract:
as he knows or should know, will surveys and valuations – you may
place reliance on it, then a duty of have two contracts with your client. • The Surveyor will not be
care will arise” responsible for any losses
A valuation survey contract may arising from a change in market
So this is the starting point of duty contain the following clauses: value due to geographical
of care. This statement applies location of the Vessel.
to all professionals, surveyors, • A clause to restrict your total
architects, engineers, lawyers etc. potential loss arising from Example of a caveat in a report:
– it is not exclusive to surveyors – providing a valuation
so as lawyers we are taught, • Limiting liability by removing • This valuation is based on
amongst other things: responsibility of change in the value of the Vessel at
value because of a change in the location it was valued
• never to give opinion as a a vessel’s location for this report and at no
favour – don’t do favours • Limiting or restricting liability other geographical location.
• stay professional because of market forces You should be aware that
• where applicable use • Excluding liability or loss geographical location may
necessary caveats arising from title problems affect the sale value of a vessel.
Matrix Insurance Services Ltd and the authors of this presentation do not accept any liability for any errors or omissions in this article. The article is
for general information only and is not intended to constitute legal or insurance advice and should not be treated as a substitute for such advice.
At the heart of this new fuel system is the self-pressurised RK Injector which utilises the pressure from the
piston compression in the combustion chamber to power the injector and to provide a much more efficient fuel
spray into the combustion chamber. The diesel fuel is injected in about 180 tiny droplets under a pressure of
more than 5,000 bar.
Switzerland based RK Lab AG is developing this self-pressurising diesel fuel injector that the company said
has the potential to reduce engine emissions dramatically. The RK Injector is a direct replacement for current
common rail diesel fuel injection systems and offers a significant reduction in cost, weight, and both NOx and
particulate emissions, the company said. It is also claimed to offer 15% or greater fuel efficiency improvement.
“As a self-pressurising diesel fuel injector, the RK Injector receives its initial compression from the piston
compression in the combustion chamber. The RK Injector multiplies this initial combustion chamber pressure
within the injector and forces the diesel fuel into the combustion chamber at significantly higher pressure through
up to 180 tiny holes in the injector,” a spokesperson for the company commented.
Innovative joystick
piloting system
Evinrude has launched a new joystick
piloting system designed for boats
equipped with two Evinrude E-TEC G2
150 to 300 HP engines. The iDock joystick
piloting system promises to be a game-
changer for the boating masses by
revolutionising low speed manoeuvring.
“And by using technology that is already built into the engine, it is significantly more affordable than any other
joystick system on the market.”
Available on boats with twin Evinrude E-TEC G2 150 to 300 HP engines, iDock is the newest addition to the
Evinrude Intelligent Piloting System, a suite of Evinrude E-TEC G2 engine features which aim to make a more boat
easy and intuitive to operate.
The DI13M range utilises selective catalytic reduction (SCR) to help achieve its low
emissions. The technology is developed by Scania in-house and ensures minimum
emissions of NOx. AdBlue, a urea-based solution, is injected into the exhaust system
to convert toxic nitrogen oxides into water and harmless nitrogen gas. The engine is
available in a selection of power output steps from 257kW (350hp) to 405kW (550hp).
“When used for propulsion, the engine continues our industry-leading tradition of
delivering optimum fuel efficiency without compromising performance,” said David
Bamber, general manager, Scania Engines.
New
underwater
mountable
thruster by
Schottel
Rolls-Royce and Svitzer demonstrate Schottel has further
expanded its portfolio
the world’s first remotely operated with the addition of a new
underwater mountable
commercial vessel thruster designed for offshore
vessels, rigs, cable laying
Rolls-Royce and global towage operator Svitzer have successfully vessels, offshore construction
demonstrated the world’s first remotely operated commercial vessel and crane ships. The 5.5 MW
in Copenhagen harbour, Denmark. The companies have also signed SRP 800 U rudder propeller
an agreement to continue their cooperation to test remote and can be installed afloat and is
autonomous operations for vessels, such as autonomous navigation, ideal for vessels that cannot
situational awareness, remote control centre and communication. be docked easily due to their
size or area of operation.
Earlier this year, one of Svitzer´s tugs, the 28m long Svitzer Hermod,
safely conducted a number of remotely controlled manoeuvres, RR Schottel has further
informed. From the quay side in Copenhagen harbour the vessel’s expanded its portfolio
captain, stationed at the vessel’s remote base at Svitzer headquarters, with the addition of a new
berthed the vessel alongside the quay, undocked, turned 360°, and underwater mountable
piloted it to the Svitzer HQ, before docking again. thruster designed for offshore
vessels, rigs, cable laying
See full article: http://bit.ly/2tt1sih vessels, offshore construction
and crane ships. The 5.5 MW
SRP 800 U rudder propeller
can be installed afloat and is
ideal for vessels that cannot
be docked easily due to their
Energy efficient propulsor size or area of operation.
“As a result of customer
launched by Steerprop requests, Schottel decided
to further develop the
Finland based Steerprop has launched a CRP ECO LM robust, well-proven rudder
propulsor featuring permanent magnet technology propeller technology in the
from The Switch to offer greater energy efficiency power range up to 5.5 MW,”
throughout its speed range. The lightweight propulsor said Roland Schwandt, sales
utilises a vertical PM motor, allowing it to sit inside a director tug and offshore
vessel hull. The motor is placed on top of the thruster, energy, Schottel.
which aims to make the unit compact and increase
efficiency without compromising on hydrodynamics. See - www.schottel.de
“When reaction time is measured in seconds, you need immediate information to make a proper response,”
said Jeff Robbins, CEO of Vesper Marine.
If a collision alarm is triggered, users can see the bearing and distance of a vessel that is a collision risk, allowing them
to change course or contact the other vessel. With anchor watch, users tap their smartwatch to mark the precise
location when the anchor is dropped, as well as monitor if the anchor is dragging.
Vesper Marine’s app works with any brand of man overboard device and when a MOB situation is encountered,
it triggers a dedicated audible alarm. The user is simultaneously alerted on their smartwatch with continuously
updated bearing and range to the person in the water.
The deckWatch app is available for all watches with the Android Wear 2 OS.
Meaco’s DD8L Zambezi dehumidifier is designed and developed to address many of the problems boat owners
face – to reduce the level of humidity in the air and help keep boats and their contents dry, designed to function
consistently well at all temperatures.
“Every day we have people who call us to say that they are suffering from mould or musty smells and want
protection over winter,” explained Meaco’s director, Chris Michael.
Features include a daily run timer to turn the dehumidifier on and off at particular times, so taking advantage of
off-peak electricity hours.
For details visit: http://bit.ly/2fj07sh Key areas of development have been the inflation
system, pack contents and canister construction.
Magnetic patches measuring 3500mm x 200mm are being fixed to the underwater surface of the floating turbine
spar where they will experience the same degree of biological growth as the main hull. At intervals of around
four months, the patches can be simply peeled-off and returned to the laboratory where the composition and
extent of any growth can be measured.
For details visit: http://bit.ly/2xdJvJx
Ian Nicolson
it your career of
choice, or something
that just happened?
A. I was supposed
to go into the Royal
HonMIIMS
Navy and passed
the exam and the
interview. Then it
was discovered that
I was short-sighted.
So I decided to build
ships, if I could not
sink them. I was
apprenticed to a
famous designer/
surveyor, Fred Parker.
To see how easy it is to acquire points, you can view the CPD points table here:
https://www.iims.org.uk/membership/continuing-professional-development/
PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY
INSURANCE YOU CAN RELY ON
IIMS Insurance Scheme – est. 2005
Designed for ship and small craft surveyors on a worldwide basis.
15% INTRODUCTORY
DISCOUNT FOR
NEW SUBSCRIBERS
+44(0)1255 831111
info@winterandcomarine.com
www.winterandcomarine.com
I N SU R A N CE FOR T H E M A R I N E I N D U S T RY
Winter & Co (Marine) Ltd is authorised and regulated by The Financial Conduct Authority