Plasma Etching Introduction
Plasma Etching Introduction
Plasma Etching Introduction
Incoming
Deposition Lithography Etch Strip Clean Deposition
Wafer
Residue/
Photoresist Particle
Post Litho
Post Pattern
Transfer
Etch Steps
• SOG Open
• SOC Open
• Partial via in
oxide/low-k
• SOC Strip
• Trench etch
Sample Requirements
• Shrink PR CD by 15nm
• Trench depth = ½ via
depth
• Within wafer
uniformity < 2 nm for
trench depth and line
CDs
► Etch rate/Throughput
► Critical dimensions
►A plasma generates reactive species which are not available in a bottle and
“delivers” them to the substrate of interest
► Electrons are the main current-carriers because they are light and mobile
► Energy transfer between light electrons and gas molecules they collide with is
inefficient and electrons can attain a high average energy (thousands of
degrees above the gas temperature)
► Initially
within the system, electrons rapidly move throughout the chamber
and are lost to the walls, as opposed to the slower and heavier ions
► Ultimately, this forms a region of net positive charge known as the sheath
►A plasma generates reactive species which are not available in a bottle and
delivers them to the substrate
► Ionmotion is random in the central glow, but when a positive ion drifts to the
sheath boundary, it is accelerated toward the wall/wafer surface
►Elastic collision:
▪When the internal energies of the two colliding particles do
not change
—The energy exchange is restricted to kinetic energy
▪The sum of the kinetic energies is conserved
►Inelastic collision:
▪When the internal energies of the two colliding particles do
change
—The sum of the kinetic energy is not conserved
Ionization: e- + Ar Ar + + 2 e- e-
inelastic
n + e-
collision
e-
Dissociation: e- + AB A + B + e-
Electron attachment:
Resonance capture (e- + SF6 SF6- ).
Dissociative attachment (e- + SF6 F + SF5- ).
►Ionization
e- + CF4 CF4+ + 2 e-
e-
inelastic
e- CF4 CF4+
collision
e-
►Dissociation
e- + CF4 CF3 + F + e-
inelastic
e- CF4 CF3
collision
e-
This is the mechanism for generation of free radicals which are the
reactive agents in the plasma
Lam Research Corp. 21
Excitation processes in the plasma
►Excitation
► Atoms and molecules in their ground states can be excited (by collisions or
radiation ) to higher energy bound states
► Most bound states can emit a photon and return to a lower energy or ground
state
▪ e- + Ar Ar* + e- Ar + e- + ħw
Ar*
ħw
ħw is the photon energy
Arf
▪ Here
Ar
►Excitation
► Thelight emitted by a plasma can provide both a qualitative and
quantitative analysis of the plasma
► Optical
emissions from the plasma are useful for plasma diagnostics
and endpointing etch recipes
Ar = 801 +/- 4nm Endpoint Detection
CN = 390 +/- 5 nm
CO = 520 +/- 5nm = 520 nm
► However, certain metastable states are longer lived (up to a few sec) which is
long enough for a collision to occur before it eventually decays
▪ Penning Dissociation:
Ar* excited state + AB A + B (where ediss < 11.6eV).
Dissociation Ionization
Cross Section;
# Electrons
Electron Energy
ions ni near RT
► Vbias
is negative with respect to the
plasma potential, Vp Bulk Plasma, Vp
100V
► The potential drop across the sheath at 85V
Floating, Vf
the powered electrode is the sum of Ground, V0
0V
the plasma potential and the self-bias
▪ Vsh = Vp + IVbiasI -250V
Powered Electrode, Vbias
► The powered electrode will be
bombarded with much higher energy
ions than that of a grounded or floating
wall
► Inactuality, the plasma (e.g., sheath potentials) are oscillating at the applied
RF frequency
Average
0.015 At 5 mTorr, ie. Plasma Potential Vp
“collisionless”
0.010
Flux
Ion IED
0.005
0.000
0 20 40 60 80 100
DC bias potential Vbias
IonIonEnergy
Energy (eV)
(eV)
► Lower frequency
produces broader
distribution and
higher mean 400W 2MHz
energy (w/ 800W 60MHz)
400W 27MHz
400W 60MHz
400W 100MHz
► Higher
frequencies
produce narrower 400W 2 MHz / 800W 60MHz
distribution and
Ion flux
0W 2MHz
27MHz power:
200W
400W
800W
Flux 51)
1200W
400 W 27MHz
Ion(mass
1600W
2000W
800 W 27MHz
ion flux
1200 W 27MHz
2000 W 27MHz
0 100 200 300
Ion energy (eV)
► Ions are accelerated through the boundary layer sheath at near normal
incidence (Directional)
Separate ion
energy & flux
3-Frequency
STI, Gate, DPT, TiN Mask Open, Contact, Metal Hard Mask All-in-
Non-volatiles, TSV One, Via, Trench
3-Frequency
► ICP tools generate high density plasmas and lower ion bombardment of
surfaces
► Simple model for etch rate depends on ion flux, ion energy, and neutral
flux/surface coverage
▪ Neglecting role of pure sputtering by inert or reactive ions
▪ Neglecting role of thermally activated neutral etching
where:
1 ei = ion energy JN = neutral flux
EtchRate eth = threshold energy A ~ ion efficiency
A B
e
Ji = ion flux B ~ sticking efficiency
1/ 2
i e th
1/ 2
Ji JN
Source: Gottscho et al., JVSTB (1992), Steinbruchel (1989)
► Special/Limiting cases
▪ When ion flux is negligible (Ji = 0) Etch Rate vanishes
▪ When neutral flux is negligible (JN = 0) Etch Rate vanishes
▪ At constant ion energy flux, the etch rate will initially increase in proportion to the
neutral flux (neutral-limited regime), but then saturate at higher neutral fluxes (ion-
limited regime)
► Condensable species
▪ Tend to form films on surfaces
▪ Very dependent on the surface temperature
► Reactive species
▪ Tend to react chemically with the surface
▪ Often saturate at one monolayer coverage
► Isotropic
Film
Substrate
► Anisotropic
Ion
Involatile
Mask
Film
Substrate
► Enhanced vertical etch rate due to synergy between ions and chemical
etching
► Anisotropic
Substrate
► Inhibitor(e.g., polymer film) deposited on the sidewalls where ions are not
effective at removing
► Anisotropic
Ion
Neutral Passivation film
Volatile
Mask
Film
Film removed
Substrate
►Ion flux
►Ion energy
►Neutral/ion flux ratio
►Deposition or passivation chemistry
►Temperature of surface being etched
►Pressure (sheath collisions may deflect ions at higher
pressures)
►F atoms etch silicon dioxide slowly at room temperature; low reaction rate
compared to ion bombardment assisted etch
▪ All observed etching of SiO2 is ion energy driven
▪ Energetic flux breaks bonds and forms reactive sites for F to form volatile products (SiF4)
Lam Research Corp. 56
Common etchant gases for silicon dioxide
► Oxygen
▪ Added to increase F and decrease polymer precursors
► An SiO2 surface with a CFx radical flux under ion bombardment forms a layer
of SiCxFyOz
▪ Ion beam mixing of CFx radicals plays an important role in the formation
► Thekey etch mechanism is likely the breaking and reforming of bonds of the
SiCxFyOz layer due to energetic ions colliding with and penetrating the surface
▪ This produces easily desorbed etch products, weakly bound to the surface
— SiF4, SiF2, SiOF2, CO, CO2, COF2, O2
▪ A layer of C is prevented from building up due to reaction with O within the film
SiF4 CO2
SiCxFyOz SiCxFyOz
SiO2 SiO2 SiO2
SiF4 CO2
CFx + CFx +
► Ifthe etch is more polymerizing (i.e., low F/C ratio), then oxygen
addition will increase the oxide etch rate without as large an increase
in the resist etch rate (thus, increasing selectivity)
▪ Due to additional oxygen liberated by SiO2 as it is etched
► Ifthe plasma is made too fluorine deficient, polymer deposition will dominate
over etching of SiO2 Etch Stop!
▪ The F/C ratio where this occurs is dependent on energetic ion flux
▪ At higher energies, etching will take place
▪ At lower energies, deposition will take place
Etching
Polymerization
F/C Ratio
► For SiO2/Si3N4 selective etching, the key factor is that nitrogen is less efficient
than oxygen in removing carbon
▪ Therefore, conditions can be found where SiO2 etches and Si3N4 does not