1 s2.0 S0020740308000805 Main
1 s2.0 S0020740308000805 Main
1 s2.0 S0020740308000805 Main
a r t i c l e in f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: An analytical method of combined plastic mechanism and elastic approaches has been developed to
Received 24 October 2007 predict the moment capacity of a thin-walled channel steel section beam. The plastic mechanism
Received in revised form approach is performed by analyzing an idealized model of bending-plastic-hinge-collapse mechanism
7 April 2008
of the beam bent about its minor neutral axis. This approach adopts a concept of the equilibrium
Accepted 15 May 2008
between external energy and the one dissipating in the hinge mechanism. Another analytical approach
has been done by analyzing the investigated beam according to an elastic-bending theory. In the elastic
Keywords: analysis, the application of an effective width concept has also been considered to account for the effect
Channel section of local buckling on the bending element of the beam. These both analytical approaches are then used in
Plastic-hinge mechanism
the method of cut-off strength to estimate a theoretical moment capacity of the beam bent about its
Moment capacity
minor neutral axis. An attempt has also been carried out to correlate the estimated moment capacity
Local buckling
Bending and effective width obtained to another one about a major neutral axis. In order to assess the accuracy of the analytical
method developed, its predicted results are verified using the data obtained from experiments and a
design code specially used for cold-formed steel structural members. The data of moment capacity
about the minor neutral axis is compared to the one measured in a number of flexural-bending tests to
failure on the similar channel steel section beams. Meanwhile, the data of moment capacity about the
major neutral axis is compared to the one calculated using the design code. A statistical analysis of
verified data populations indicates that the mean value of deviated data from experimental one is 1.025
with the standard deviation of 0.087 and from the design code is 1.004 with the standard deviation of
0.111. These statistical measures clearly mean that the analytical model presented herein, on average,
tends to estimate conservatively the moment capacity of the investigated beam about its both
unsymmetrical and symmetrical–neutral axes by less than 5% and this is certainly still within
acceptable limits of 720%.
& 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0020-7403/$ - see front matter & 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.05.004
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Flange elements
Web element
6 8 79 7
10
10
8 5
2 6 2
1 3 4 9 3
5 1 4
1 – 10 : plastic hinges
Fig. 1. Bending-plastic failure mechanisms of the investigated beam [1]: (a) side view and (b) top view.
Having determined the length of each plastic hinge, the analytical 2.2. Elastic analysis
determination is subsequently employed to determine the rota-
tion angle of each plastic hinge during deformation. The formula In the elastic analysis, the investigated beam is treated as an
of each angle is as follows: elastic-bending beam theory and analyzed according to a non-
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi linear material stress–strain relationship. The expression of this
2 sin a f cos a 2f tan a
y1 ¼ ; y2 ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi , relationship is as follows [5,7]:
sin ð2a þ fÞ tan a f1 þ cos ð2a þ fÞg
0qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi1
2 2 s 3s s n1 log 17
x2 x1 ¼ þ ; n¼1þ 7 (15)
y3 ¼ tan1 @ A (5) E 7E s0:7 log ss0:85
0:7
x1
The symbols of s, e and E represent the stress, strain and elastic
The factors of x1 and x2 in the equation of y3 is computed from:
modulus of the basic material. Meanwhile, s0.7 and s0.85 are,
x1 ¼ ðB1 FÞ2 þ ðC 1 FÞ2 ðB1 C 1 Þ2 ; x2 ¼ 2ðB1 FÞðC 1 FÞ (6) respectively, the stresses corresponding to 70% and 85% of the
elastic modulus E. In the above equation of e, the first right hand
W f tan ða bÞ W f tan b side term represents the linear-elastic behavior of the basic
B1 F ¼ ; C1F ¼ ,
tan a cos b tan a cos b material and the second one represents the non-linear-elastic one.
Wf An elastic moment carrying capacity of the beam shown in
AB1 ¼ (7) Fig. 6 is obtainable from deriving Eq. (15) and expressed in terms
tan a cos b cos ða bÞ
of the mid-span elastic deflection (Z). Fig. 6 clearly indicates that
Wf the applied-bending moment M causes the bending element of
AC 1 ¼ ,
tan a cos2 b the beam to be more affected by compressive stresses than tensile
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ones. It is therefore the derivation of Eq. (15) to be performed
B1 C 1 ¼ ðAB1 Þ2 þ ðAC 1 Þ2 2ðAB1 ÞðAC 1 Þ cos a (8)
according to the stress and strain in the compression region and
Substitution of Eqs. (3)–(8) into Eq. (2) and further expanding it, their values are:
the plastic moment carrying capacity of the beam (Mp) can be 8yc ZE Myc
directly expressed in terms of the mechanism angle (f): sc ¼ ; c ¼ (16)
L2 EI
M p ¼ C 1 ðC 2 þ C 3 þ C 4 Þ (9) Eq. (16) is then substituted into Eq. (15) and analyzing it to
where formulate the following elastic moment carrying capacity:
sy t 2 W f 8EIZ 24EIZ 8Eyc Z n1
C1 ¼ , M¼ 2
þ (17)
2 tan a sin a cos bðfÞ L 7L2 L2 s0:7
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 tan a cos b sin a f Eq. (17) consists of two different elastic behaviors, i.e. linear and
C2 ¼ ; fX0:001 (10)
sin ð2a þ fÞ tan a non-linear elastic behaviors. The elastic moment carrying capacity
(Me) is determined according to these linear and non-linear elastic
C 3 ¼ sin aðy3 Þ, behaviors. In order to account for the effect of local buckling in
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2f tan a bending elements of the beam, section properties used in the
C 4 ¼ sin a cos bðtan a tan bÞ cos a elastic analysis are determined using the effective cross-section.
f1 þ cos ð2a þ fÞg
Thus, the linear-elastic moment carrying capacity (Me) is
fX0:001 (11)
calculated using:
With reference to Fig. 4, the mid-span deflection of the beam (Z)
8EIxeff Z
can be expressed in terms of the mechanism angle (f) using the Me ¼ (18)
small deflection theory. Thus, the plastic mid-span deflection is L2
In the meantime, the non-linear elastic moment carrying capacity
ðL 2aÞf
Z¼ (12) (Mne) is
2
The angles of a and b can be experimentally recognized and, on 24EIxeff Z 8Eyceff ðZne Z0:7 Þ n1
Mne ¼ M0:7 þ (19)
average, they are close to 751 and 601, respectively. In the meantime, 7L2 L2 s0:7
the value of (a) approximately approaches to (Wf/tan a) and a
where Me and Mne represent the elastic moment carrying capacity
reduction factor Rf should be introduced to reduce the plastic
(Mel) and, Ixeff is the second moment of area about the minor
moment carrying capacity (Mpl). Its formulation can therefore be
neutral axis of the effective cross-section; yceff is the position of
rewritten as shown in Eq. (13). The reason of introducing Rf is to
compressed outer fiber from the minor neutral axis of the
produce an analytical moment capacity, which is close to actual one
effective cross-section; M0.7. Is the elastic moment carrying
measured in experiments. In this research program, Rf is determined
based on the square root of the ratio between section modulus of
the full cross-section in the tensile region and the compressive one.
A further analysis of this square root of the section modulus ratio Compressive stress distribution
M M
will provide an expression used to determine Rf in Eq. (14): yc σc
M pl ¼ Rf C 1 ðC 2 þ C 3 þ C 4 Þ (13)
yt
rffiffiffiffiffi 2
η
yt ðW f rÞðW f þ rÞ þ 4r
Rf ¼ ; yt ¼ ; yc ¼ W f yt (14)
yc 2ðW f rÞ þ pr þ W w
Eqs. (13) and (14) are subsequently used in the iteration process to σt
L Tensile stress distribution
establish an unloading theoretical bending–deflection relation-
ship curve. Fig. 6. Elastic-bending beam theory.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Center
Center
y Wf1
y Weff
yc L
Wf x x yceff
yt r L x yteff r x
r = rc + 05t 1
y Ww y Ww x-x : minor neutral axis
y-y : major neutral axis
Fig. 7. Full and effective section dimensions: (a) full section and (b) effective section.
capacity corresponding to s0.7; Zne is the mid-span deflection at curve of an inclining-elastic moment–deflection relationship will
the non-linear elastic region; and Z0.7 is the mid-span deflection be established. In order to implement the method of cut-off
corresponding to M0.7. strength shown in Fig. 2, Eqs. (13), (14), (18) and (19) are iterated
The effective section properties (Ixeff and yceff) are determined to estimate the moment capacity of the investigated beam bent
from the effective section of the beam in Fig. 7(b). An effective about its minor neutral axis (x–x). The iteration is carried out by
width concept used to account for the effect of local buckling is initially setting the value of f ¼ 0.001 and incrementally increas-
only applied to the compressive region of the bending elements. ing it until the value of plastic moment carrying capacity (Mpl)
Meanwhile, the other tensile ones are assumed still fully effective and the elastic one (Mel) converge at a point. The value of moment
in carrying loads. carrying capacity at this converging point is assumed the
In Fig. 7(b), W 1f and W 1w are equal to (Wfr) and (Ww2r), theoretical moment capacity about the minor neutral axis.
whereas Weff is the effective width of flange elements and it is An attempt has also been employed to correlate the theoretical
determined according to following procedure [8]. If the slender- moment capacity about the minor neutral axis to another
ness factor of flange elements (lf) is moment capacity of the beam about the major one. This corre-
lation is determined according to a criterion of conventional–
lf p0:673 ) W eff ¼ W 1f ; lf 40:673 ) W eff ¼ rW 1f (20) structural design. In this criterion, the applied load should be
lf and r are calculated using: designed in such a way that it is not permitted to cause plastic
sffiffiffiffiffiffi deformation within the structure. In order to be able to correlate
f 1 ð0:22=lf Þ these two moment capacities, the following reasons are taken into
lf ¼ ; r¼ (21)
F cr lf account in the analysis:
Substituting Eqs. (23) and (24) into Eqs. (18) and (19) and further sy Ixeff sy Iyeff
ðM yield Þx ¼ ; ðM yield Þy ¼ (26)
analyzing them through an iteration process, another theoretical yceff ycy þ 0:5t
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2 3
y2ceff þ ðyteff rÞ2 þ rf2r þ pðyteff rÞgþ where ff and fw are stresses acting on the part of the flange and
ðMp Þx ¼ sy t 4 5 web elements, which initially undergoes yielding. It can be seen in
ðW w 2rÞyteff
the bending stress distribution of Fig. 8(b) that the maximum
r ¼ r c þ 0:5t compressive stress (sc)max is greater than the tensile one (st)max.
2 r fpycy rðp2Þg
3 Therefore, initial yielding will certainly be taken place on the
ðW eff Þy ycy þ 2 þ
6 n o 7 compressive parts of the flange and web elements. For the
6 7
6W 2 7 purpose of analysis, the value of ff and fw is equated to the yield
6 efw1 ycy ð0:5W efw1 þ rÞ þ 0:5W efw2 7
6
ðMp Þy ¼ sy t 6 7 (27) strength of the basic material (sy) and the critical buckling stress
7
6 2 r fpyty rðp2Þg 7 of flange (Fcr)f as well as web (Fcr)w is
6 þ0:5ðyty rÞ þ 2 7
4 5
þyty ðW f rÞ !2
p2 E t
ðF cr Þf ¼ 0:43 ,
Effective dimensions such as (Weff)y, Wefw1 and Wefw2 are clearly 12ð1 m2 Þ W 1f
presented and discussed in the next section. !2
p2 E t
ðF cr Þw ¼ kw (30)
12ð1 m2 Þ W 1w
3. Application of the design code
where E and m are the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio
In this research program, the application of the design code is respectively, whereas kw is a buckling coefficient of the stiffened
mainly aimed at determining the moment capacity of the web element. The calculation of this coefficient is as follows:
investigated beam when it is bent about its major neutral yt1
axis (Mcy). The design code used is the one that is specially kw ¼ 4 þ 2ð1 þ cÞ3 þ 2ð1 þ cÞ; c¼ (31)
yc1
recommended for design analyses of cold-formed steel structural
members [8]. In case of the flexural-bending beam investigated
2ðW 1w þ 2rÞðW eff Þy þ ð2r þ pW 1w þ prÞr þ ðW 1w þ 2rÞW 1w þ 2r 2
here and according to the design code that the moment capacity yt1 ¼ ,
(Mcy) should be determined from the smallest value of: 2ððW eff Þy þ pr þ W 1w þ W 1f Þ
yc1 ¼ W w yt1 (32)
Nominal flexural strength (Mnb);
Lateral–torsional buckling strength (Mnt). r ¼ r c þ 0:5t; W 1f ¼ bf ðr c þ tÞ; W 1w ¼ bw 2ðr c þ tÞ (33)
The nominal flexural strength (Mnb) is determined by taking The effective width of the top flange element (Weff)y is
into account the effective cross-section shown in Fig. 8 and calculated from Eq. (34) and the value of rf is as indicated in
formulated as follows: Eq. (35). In case of the bending web element, its effective width is
determined by the procedure as specified in Eqs. (36)–(38):
M nb ¼ Se F y (28)
Se is an elastic section modulus of the effective cross-section and lf p0:673 ) ðW eff Þy ¼ W 1f
Fy is the design yield strength that is equivalent to the yield lf 40:673 ) ðW eff Þy ¼ rf W 1f (34)
strength of the basic material.
In Fig. 8, (Weff)y, Wefw1 and Wefw2 are the effective width of the
compressed-unstiffened flange and the bending-stiffened web. 1 0:22
lf
rf ¼ (35)
These effective dimensions are determined according to the lf
slenderness factor of the flange (lf) and web (lw) elements, where
the factor can be obtained from: lw p0:673 ) W efw ¼ W 1w ; lw 40:673 ) W efw ¼ rw W 1w
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ff fw 1 0:22
lw
lf ¼ ; lw ¼ (29) rw ¼ (36)
ðF cr Þf ðF cr Þw lw
bf (Weff)y
Wf
(σc)max (σc)max
rc x
Wefw1 rc x
0.5Ww
t ycy
y Center y
bw Ww bw Ww1 Wefw2 Ww
Center
y y
0.5Ww t
yty
rc x rc x
(σt)max (σt)max
y0 Wf1
Fig. 8. Full and effective cross-sections: (a) full cross-section and bending stress distribution and (b) effective cross-section and bending stress distribution.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
W efw F e X2:8sy ) F c ¼ sy ,
W efw1 ¼ ,
3þc 10 10sy
8 2:78sy 4F e 40:56sy ) F c ¼ sy 1 ,
bw < c40:236 ) W efw2 ¼ W efw 9 36F e
2
p4 ) (37) F e p0:56sy ) F c ¼ F e (43)
bf : cp0:236 ) W efw2 ¼ W efw W efw1
cb p2 EðW w tÞIxc
Fe ¼ (44)
bw W efw Sf ðK x lx Þ2
44 ) W efw2 ¼ (38)
bf ð1 þ cÞ W efw1 In Eq. (44), the value of cb may be equated to unity for the reason of a
conservative approach and the other factors are as follows:
The subsequent analysis is to determine section properties of the E is the elastic modulus; Ixc is the second moment of compression
effective cross-section shown in Fig. 8(b). It can be seen in Figure region of full cross-section shown in Fig. 8(a) about the minor neutral
that the neutral axis y–y of the effective cross-section is no longer axis x–x and it can be calculated using Eq. (45); Sf is the compressive-
a symmetrical one and its position is as follows: elastic section modulus of full cross-section and it is formulated in
Eq. (47); Kx is the effective length factor and if ends of the beam can
2yt1 ððW eff Þy þ pr þ W 1w þ W 1f Þ f2W 1w þ 2r yc1 þ ðW efw1 þ W efw2 Þ 2W efw1 g
yty ¼ freely rotate to the direction of its minor, major and longitudinal axes,
2fðW eff Þy þ pr þ W 1w þ W 1f yc1 þ ðW efw1 þ W efw2 Þg
the value of Kx ¼ 1.10 [9]; and lx is the overall length of the beam
yc1 ðW efw1 þ W efw2 Þ
, without bracing and it is bent about its minor neutral axis x–x.
2fðW eff Þy þ pr þ W 1w þ W 1f yc1 þ ðW efw1 þ W efw2 Þg
2 n o 3
(39) 1 1 2 1 2 2 2
6 2pW f ðW f Þ þ 3ðW f þ 2r 2y0 Þ þ 6r r ðp 8Þ 7
ycy ¼ W w yty
6 7
Ixc ¼ t 6 n o2 7
yt1 and yc1 in the above equation are the same as the ones 4 5
þ2 py0 rðp 2Þ þ pW 1w ðt 2 þ 12y20 Þ
computed using Eq. (32). Meanwhile, the elastic section modulus
(Se) in Eq. (28) is calculated about the outer fiber of the (45)
compressive region so that its value is
where y0 is the distance of the minor neutral axis x–x to the centerline
Iyeff of the web element (see Fig. 8) and it can be computed using:
Se ¼ (40)
ycy þ 0:5t W 1f ðW 1f þ 2rÞ þ r 2 ðp 2Þ
y0 ¼ (46)
2W 1f þ pr þ W 1w
Iyeff is the second moment of the effective cross-section about the
neutral axis y–y and it can be obtained from: Iyy
Sf ¼
0:5ðW w þ tÞ
2 n o 3
ðW eff Þy tðt 2 þ 12y2cy Þ 1 2 1 2 2 2
Iyeff ¼ 6 2pW f t þ 3ðW w þ 2rÞ þ 3r 2r ðp 8Þ 7
12 t 66
7
7
Iyy ¼ n o (47)
trbr 2 ðp2 8Þ þ 2fpycy rðp 2Þg2 c 6
12p 4 1
2
1 3
7
5
þ þ pðW þ 2rÞ 2rðp 2Þ
w þ pðW Þ w
4p
tW efw1 fW 2efw1 þ 3ð2ycy W efw1 2rÞ2 g tW 3efw2
þ þ Hence, the moment capacity of the investigated beam bent about
12 3
3
its major neutral axis y–y (Mcy) analytically obtained from the
tðyty rÞ tr½r ðp 8Þ þ 2fpyty rðp 2Þg2
2 2
design code is as follows:
þ þ
3 4p (
1 2 Mnb 4M nt ) M cy ¼ M nt
tW f ðt þ 12y2ty Þ if (48)
þ (41) Mnb oM nt ) M cy ¼ M nb
12
Substitution of Eqs. (40) and (41) into Eq. (28) will provide the
value of nominal flexural strength (Mnb) of the investigated beam
Table 1
subjected to flexural-bending moments about its major neutral
Mechanical properties of the basic material
axis y–y.
The lateral–torsional buckling strength (Mnt) is determined Specimen group sy (MPa) s0.7 (MPa) s0.85 (MPa) sUTS (MPa) E ( 103 MPa)
using Eq. (42) where Sc is equivalent to Se formulated in Eq. (40).
t ¼ 1.60 mm 153.00 115.33 93.67 291.00 191.67
Fc can be calculated according to the procedure as indicated in
t ¼ 2.30 mm 175.00 162.66 145.33 314.00 194.81
Eq. (43). In this equation, Fe is an elastic-critical lateral–torsional t ¼ 3.20 mm 266.00 252.18 240.20 371.00 198.89
buckling stress and obtainable from Eq. (44):
sy, yield strength; s0.85, stress corresponding to 85% E; E, modulus of elasticity; s0.7,
M nt ¼ Sc F c ; Sc ¼ Se (42) stress corresponding to 70% E; sUTS, ultimate tensile strength.
r = 20.00
A t
20.00 40.00
22.36 A 22.36
40.00 120.00 40.00 Cross section A-A
244.72
bw Nominal dimensions:
bw = 100 and 150 mm
Ww bf = 40 and 50 mm
t = 1.60, 2.30 and
3.20 mm
rc rc = 2.25 mm
bf Wf t L = 600 mm
90°° 90°
L Ww = b w – t
Wf = bf – 0.5t
x Fe / 2 Fe / 2 t rc x bf
A bw y
L = 600
Table 2
Comparison of analytical model and experiment
No. Specimen designation bf/t bw/t t (mm) rc/t Moment capacity, Mcx (kNm) Mult/Mcx
1 U3.2-9 (100 40 3.2) 12.53 31.32 3.19 0.71 1.167 1.229 1.05
2 U3.2-7 (150 50 3.2) 15.47 46.72 3.20 0.70 1.523 1.380 0.91
3 U2.3-7 (150 50 2.3) 21.61 65.22 2.30 0.98 0.608 0.661 1.09
4 U2.3-9 (100 40 2.3) 17.39 43.48 2.30 0.98 0.475 0.489 1.03
5 U3.2-5 (150 50 3.2) 15.63 46.88 3.20 0.70 1.543 1.609 1.04
6 U3.2-4 (100 40 3.2) 12.34 31.25 3.20 0.70 1.155 1.178 1.02
7 U2.3-6 (150 50 2.3) 21.74 65.22 2.30 0.98 0.614 0.658 1.07
8 U2.3-7 (100 40 2.3) 17.39 43.48 2.30 0.98 0.475 0.464 0.98
9 U3.2-8 (100 50 3.2) 15.67 31.29 3.19 0.71 1.710 1.627 0.95
10 U2.3-7 (100 50 2.3) 21.74 43.48 2.30 0.98 0.675 0.632 0.94
11 U2.3-4 (100 50 2.3) 21.74 43.48 2.30 0.98 0.675 0.707 1.05
12 U1.6-9 (100 40 1.6) 25.00 62.50 1.60 1.41 0.224 0.259 1.16
13 U1.6-8 (100 50 1.6) 31.25 62.50 1.60 1.41 0.303 0.313 1.03
14 U1.6-6 (150 50 1.6) 31.92 95.77 1.57 1.43 0.278 0.330 1.19
15 U3.2-5 (100 50 3.2) 15.65 31.32 3.19 0.71 1.707 1.487 0.87
Table 3
Comparison of analytical model and design code
No. Specimen designation bf/t bw/t t (mm) rc/t Moment capacity, Mcy (kNm) (Mcy)AISI/Mcy
1 U3.2-9 (100 40 3.2) 12.53 31.32 3.19 0.71 4.813 4.996 1.04
2 U3.2-7 (150 50 3.2) 15.47 46.72 3.20 0.70 9.360 10.206 1.09
3 U2.3-7 (150 50 2.3) 21.61 65.22 2.30 0.98 4.344 4.775 1.10
4 U2.3-9 (100 40 2.3) 17.39 43.48 2.30 0.98 2.100 2.412 1.15
5 U3.2-5 (150 50 3.2) 15.63 46.88 3.20 0.70 9.490 10.283 1.08
6 U3.2-4 (100 40 3.2) 12.34 31.25 3.20 0.70 4.839 4.977 1.03
7 U2.3-6 (150 50 2.3) 21.74 65.22 2.30 0.98 4.374 4.780 1.09
8 U2.3-7 (100 40 2.3) 17.39 43.48 2.30 0.98 2.100 2.412 1.15
9 U3.2-8 (100 50 3.2) 15.67 31.29 3.19 0.71 6.192 5.452 0.88
10 U2.3-7 (100 50 2.3) 21.74 43.48 2.30 0.98 2.820 2.549 0.90
11 U2.3-4 (100 50 2.3) 21.74 43.48 2.30 0.98 2.820 2.549 0.90
12 U1.6-9 (100 40 1.6) 25.00 62.50 1.60 1.41 1.332 1.363 1.02
13 U1.6-8 (100 50 1.6) 31.25 62.50 1.60 1.41 1.767 1.410 0.80
14 U1.6-6 (150 50 1.6) 31.92 95.77 1.57 1.43 2.831 2.636 0.95
15 U3.2-5 (100 50 3.2) 15.65 31.32 3.19 0.71 6.190 5.459 0.88
experimental one (Mult). This is clearly indicated by the inter- found out from the predicted values of both moment capacities
secting point between the plastic mechanism and elastic curves, that the increase of their values directly correlates to the
which is relatively close to the actual-maximum moment carrying increasing dimension of the bending beam element. It is believed
capacity of the experimental curve. that this phenomenon is caused by the following arguments:
The analytical model also shows that the value of its predicted
moment capacity about both minor and major neutral axes
The bending element is the one of the beam that directly
(Mcx and Mcy) of the investigated channel beam is significantly
carries bending stresses affected by the applied bending
affected by variations of the bending beam element. It can be
moment.
The increase of its dimension will lead to the increase of the
1.6 second moment of area as well as the elastic section modulus
(Mcy)AISI : moment capacity calculated using the
design code about the both neutral axes of the beam.
1.4 (Mcy) : moment capacity estimated by the Because the bending stresses are equal to the applied bending
analytical model moment divided by the elastic section modulus so that the
+ 20% increase of this modulus value will reduce the bending
1.2 stresses.
The moment capacity is the maximum moment that can be
(Mcy)AISI
0.4
0 25 50 75 100 125 On the basis of these above arguments, variations in dimension
bw of the bending element are analytically too significant in
t influencing the moment capacity of the investigated beam. In
order to illustrate the influence of this parameter, Figs. 16 and 17
Fig. 14. Degree of accuracy between the analytical model and design code. display the correlation of moment capacity and bending element
4 2
Specimen : U3.2-9 (100x40x3,2) Specimen : U2.3-7 (150x50x2.3)
(Mcx) : predicted moment capacity (Mcx) : predicted moment capacity
Bending moment, M (kNm)
Bending moment, M (kNm)
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Mid-span deflection, η (mm) Mid-span deflection, η (mm)
0.8
Specimen : U1.6-9 (100x40x1.6)
(Mcx) : predicted moment capacity
Bending moment, M (kNm)
Fig. 15. Method of cut-off strength in the prediction of moment capacity. Specimen of nominal thickness: (a) t ¼ 3.20 mm, (b) t ¼ 2.30 mm and (c) t ¼ 1.60 mm.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2.25 1.5
Specimen group : U3.2 Specimen group : U2.3
Mcx : moment capacity about minor Mcx : moment capacity about minor
2 1.25
neutral axis neutral axis
bf : full width of flange element bf : full width of flange element
1
Mcx (kNm)
Mcx (kNm)
1.75 t : wall thickness t : wall thickness
0.75
1.5
0.5
1.25 Experiment 0.25 Experiment
Prediction Prediction
1 0
12 13 14 15 16 15 17.5 20 22.5 25
bf bf
t t
0.75
Specimen group : U1.6
Mcx : moment capacity about minor
neutral axis
0.5 bf : full width of flange element
Mcx (kNm)
t : wall thickness
0.25
Experiment
Prediction
0
20 25 30 35
bf
t
Fig. 16. Comparison of analytical model and experiments. Specimen of nominal thickness: (a) t ¼ 3.20 mm, (b) t ¼ 2.30 mm and (c) t ¼ 1.60 mm.
21 10
Specimen group : U3.2 Specimen group : U2.3
18 Mcy : moment capacity about major Mcy : moment capacity about major
neutral axis 8
neutral axis
15 bw : overall height of web element bw : overall height of web element
Mcy (kNm)
Mcy (kNm)
9 4
6
2
3 Design Code Design Code
Prediction Prediction
0 0
30 35 40 45 50 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
bw bw
t t
7
Specimen group : U1.6
6 Mcy : moment capacity about major
neutral axis
5
bw : overall height of web element
Mcy (kNm)
4 t : wall thickness
3
2
1 Design Code
Prediction
0
50 60 70 80 90 100
bw
t
Fig. 17. Comparison of analytical model and design code. Specimen of nominal thickness: (a) t ¼ 3.20 mm, (b) t ¼ 2.30 mm and (c) t ¼ 1.60 mm.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
variations of the channel beam. In case of the channel beam bent capacities and this is also confirmed by the results of experiment
about the minor neutral axis, its moment capacity (Mcx) is plotted and design code.
in terms of bending flange ratio (bf/t). Meanwhile, the moment
capacity of the channel beam bent about its major neutral axis
(Mcy) is plotted in terms of bending web ratio (bw/t). Both Figs. 16 Acknowledgments
and 17 also display the verification of the analytical correlation of
moment capacity and bending element ratio using the actual one The research program presented in this paper is fully under-
measured from the experiments and the data of design code for taken by the Technology Center for Structural Strength—Agency
cold-formed steel structural members. It is clearly shown in the for the Assessment and Application of Technology (B2TKS-BPPT),
Figures that the analytical predictions well agree with the results which is located at the National Research Center for the Science
of the experiments and design code. and Technology (PUSPIPTEK) in Serpong, Tangerang, Indonesia.
The financial support to accomplish this research program is fully
granted by the Indonesian Government through a project frame-
6. Conclusions work in the Agency for the Assessment and Application of
Technology (BPPT).
An alternative-analytical model, which is based on the combined
plastic mechanism and elastic approaches, has been developed to
determine the moment capacity of a thin-walled channel steel
References
section beam. The plastic mechanism approach is carried out by
adopting an energy equilibrium concept to analyze a plastic failure
[1] Setiyono H. The development of an analytical model for the strength of light
mechanism of the beam subjected to flexural bending about its gauge steel structures. Final research reports. Agency for the Assessment and
minor neutral axis. In the elastic approach, the effect of local Application of Technology (BPPT), 2001–2003 [translated from Indonesian
buckling on the bending element of the beam is taken into account Language].
[2] Bakker MCM. Yield line analysis of post-collapse behaviour of thin-walled
through an effective width concept in determining its section steel members. Heron 1990;35(3):3–50.
properties. The moment capacity of the beam is then directly [3] Setiyono H. Web crippling of cold-formed plain channel steel section beams.
estimated from the method of cut-off strength of the two different PhD thesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, August 1994,
pp. 199–234.
moment–deflection relationship curves established by the plastic [4] Setiyono H. Application of plastic mechanism approach to analyze the
mechanism and elastic approaches. strength of a light gauge steel section. In: Proceedings of the 10th
The analytical model is also further developed to find the International Pacific Conference on Automotive Engineering (IPC-10), Mel-
bourne, Australia, May 23–28, 1999, pp. 53–58.
correlation between the moment capacities of the beam that is [5] Setiyono H. Plastic mechanism and elastic-analytical approaches applied to
bent about its minor and major neutral axes. In assessing the estimate the strength of an axially-compressed-thin-walled channel steel
accuracy of the analytical model developed, its predicted results section beam. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 2007;49(3):257–66.
[6] Horne MR. Plastic theory of structures. Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd; 1971.
are verified by the ones of flexural bending tests on a number of [7] Lau SCW, Hancock GJ. Inelastic buckling analyses of beams, columns and
identical channel beam specimens as well as the data of the plates using the spline finite strip method. Thin-walled Structures 1989;7:
design code specially used for cold-formed steel structural 213–38.
[8] AISI Standard. North American specification for the design of cold-formed
members. It can be found out from a statistical analysis that the
steel structural members, 2001 edition.
data of the analytical model, on average, tends to estimate [9] British Standard. Structural use of steelwork in building—part 5. Code of
conservatively the one of experiment and design code by 2.5% and practice for design of cold-formed thin gauge sections, BS 5950-5, 1998.
0.4% with the standard deviations of 0.087 and 0.111. Moreover, [10] Japanese Standards Association. JIS handbook—ferrous materials & metal-
lurgy I, 1995. p. 34.
the analytical predictions exhibit that the bending element [11] Japanese Standards Association. JIS handbook—ferrous materials & metal-
variations of the investigated beam significantly affect its moment lurgy II, 1995. p. 253–72.