Digital Smile Design Concept
Digital Smile Design Concept
Digital Smile Design Concept
net/publication/309426680
Digital Smile Design concept delineates the final potential result of crown
lengthening and porcelain veneers to correct a gummy smile
CITATIONS READS
25 6,665
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by David Montalvo Arias on 26 October 2016.
338
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
TRUSHKOWSKY ET AL
339
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
CASE REPORT
340
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
TRUSHKOWSKY ET AL
341
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
CASE REPORT
342
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
TRUSHKOWSKY ET AL
343
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
CASE REPORT
Precisely replicating every detail of The first wax-up was created based
our DSD, and strictly adhering to the on the DSD measurements (Fig 10). The
information derived from the DSD, ena- restorations proposed in the wax-up
bled us to achieve the predicted esthet- were transferred to the patient’s mouth
ic outcome. A digital caliper was used (the mock-up) through the use of a sili-
to measure some reference points on cone putty matrix (Lab Putty, Coltène
the casts. With the aid of a calibrated Whaledent) and bis-acryl (Luxatemp
virtual digital ruler, the reference points Ultra, DMG). The incisal edge position
were transferred to the computer photo- and parallelism to the horizontal refer-
graphs of the patient. Incisal edge pos- ence line were verified. A few minor in-
ition, as always, dictated the design of traoral modifications were carried out,
the restorations, and the initial position and an impression of the mock-up was
of the edge was considered correct. made. The final wax-up was created
344
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
TRUSHKOWSKY ET AL
Fig 14 Impression of the mock-up after a few cor- Fig 15 Final preparation indexes.
rections.
on the newly poured models. Indexes new provisional restorations were fab-
fabricated from this new wax-up were ricated from the putty silicon index. As
used as the surgical and preparation the provisional restorations will remain in
guides (Figs 12 to 15). With the aid of the place until the end of the soft tissue heal-
guides, the esthetic crown lengthening ing process, they were highly polished
surgery and gingival margin correction and bonded for retention. Osseous re-
were accomplished.7 contouring to establish an acceptable
The thickness and adaptation of the biologic width was then accomplished.
mock-up makes it a precise surgical A full thickness flap was raised to allow
stent and increases the predictability of visualization during the osteoplasty and
the procedure. A gingivectomy was ac- to permit accurate positioning of the
complished and the mock-up removed. gingival margin with interrupted sutures
Once the soft tissue collar was removed, (Figs 16 to 27).
345
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
CASE REPORT
Fig 18 Gingivectomy, mock-up removal, and tis- Fig 19 Acid etching the old porcelain.
sue collar removal.
346
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
TRUSHKOWSKY ET AL
347
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
CASE REPORT
its esthetic qualities and due to the ab- transparent shade try-in gel (Variolink II,
sence of contraindicating occlusal is- Ivoclar Vivadent). The patient was given
sues. Although not as strong as pressed the opportunity to see the restorations
veneers, feldspathic veneers provide in her mouth and consented to their ce-
better color control. Moreover, less re- mentation. A water rinse was used to
duction is required. When the veneers remove all traces of the try-in gel from
were returned from the laboratory, they the restorations. The internal surfaces of
were inspected for conformity to the final the restorations were scrubbed for 15 s
wax-up. They were then tried in using a with a 35% phosphoric acid solution
(Ultra-Etch, Ultradent) and ultrasonically
cleaned in alcohol for 1 min. Silane prim-
er (Ultradent) was placed on the internal
surface of the veneers and allowed to air
dry. Bonding agent (Prime & Bond NT,
Dentsply) was applied, allowing 30 s for
the solvent to evaporate. The veneered
teeth were isolated with rubber dam,
etched with Ultra-Etch for 15 s, then
rinsed with water for 30 s. Prime & Bond
NT bonding agent was applied to the
internal surface of the veneers. The res-
torations were then loaded with the base
shade (Variolink II cement transparent)
Fig 29 Feldspathic veneers. and seated on the teeth. A small brush
348
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
TRUSHKOWSKY ET AL
Discussion
Excessive gingival display or gummy
smile represents an emotionally charged
esthetic concern for many patients and
a technique-sensitive challenge for clin-
icians. The clinician must understand
the various causes, determine the cor-
rect diagnosis, and formulate a clinically
predictable esthetic treatment plan. The
diagnosis of gummy smile is not rare; the
incidence of excessive gingival display
is 10% of the population between 20 and
30 years of age, and is more commonly Fig 31 Incisal characterization of the veneers.
349
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
CASE REPORT
a b c
and the whole incisor crown is displayed at rest; amount of gingival exposure at
(P < 0.05). In the case of the male smile, rest, during speech, smile, and laughter;
laypeople consider it most attractive smile line; and gingival margin line.
when the upper lip rests on the gingival As previously stated, the treatment re-
margin of the maxillary incisor clinical quired to address a gummy smile is de-
crown. Orthodontists and clinicians dif- pendent on the diagnosis of the cause
fer slightly – they consider it esthetically of the problem. Gummy smile cases
most pleasing when the upper lip is on diagnosed as being the result of VME
the gingival margin of the maxillary inci- can often be treated by orthognathic
sor crown, and when there is 2 mm of surgery. A LeFort I procedure involves
upper lip incisor coverage (P < 0.05).11 the down fracture of the maxilla with the
Oshagh et al found that in short-face pat- repositioning of the dentoalveolar com-
terns, lower smile lines are more accept- plex.13 However, a multidisciplinary ap-
able by both dentists and laypeople, and proach is required in some instances, in
in long-face patterns, higher smile lines addition to or instead of surgery. Ortho-
are more acceptable.12 All these find- dontic treatment, periodontal treatment
ings should be considered when setting or restorative dentistry is often indicat-
orthodontic treatment goals. ed.14,15 The development of temporary
A correct diagnosis can be made from anchorage devices (TADs) has resulted
an appropriate examination consisting in a variety of techniques used to treat a
of: facial symmetry and proportions in gummy smile with orthodontics.16 Botu-
both frontal and lateral views; upper lip linum toxin type A, with effects lasting
length at rest; display of maxillary teeth 3 to 6 months, has been reported.17,18
350
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
TRUSHKOWSKY ET AL
a b c
a b c
351
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
CASE REPORT
Reestablishing the depth of the vesti- In these cases, the body will spontane-
bule to treat a short upper lip has also ously attempt to reestablish the correct
been reported. Similarly, a surgical pro- biologic width. Recession will occur in
cedure to limit the movement of the el- thin biotypes due to crestal resorption,
evator muscles has also been recom- and protracted inflammation will occur
mended.19 in thick biotypes. Either scenario would
In this case, the origin of the gummy be detrimental to any restoration placed
smile was determined to be dentogin- in this environment. Osseous recontour-
gival. Once that assessment had been ing is required to rectify the violation of
made, DSD was used to visualize the fi- the biologic width. As in this case, this
nal esthetic result. The key to successful can be accomplished by placing pro-
treatment was then to select the appro- visionals at the preferred crown length
priate techniques to correct the anatom- and then waiting for soft tissue healing.
ic problems, maintain the biologic width, A flap is later raised while the papilla is
and achieve the visualized final esthetic maintained, and osseous recontouring is
result. Based on the work of Gargiulo et accomplished, with the provisional res-
al, the biological width is defined as the toration providing a surgical template.
dimension of the soft tissue that is at- The flap is then replaced in its previous
tached to the portion of the tooth coro- position. Type III crown lengthening is
nal to the crest of the alveolar bone.20 needed when repositioning of the gingi-
After evaluating 171 cadaver tooth sur- val margin would result in disclosure of
faces, Vacek et al reported the follow- the osseous crest. To encourage rees-
ing mean dimensions: a sulcus depth tablishment of a healthy biologic width,
of 0.69 mm; an epithelial attachment of a surgical template is required to assist
0.97 mm and a connective tissue attach- in appropriate bone reshaping under the
ment of 1.07 mm; observed mean meas- elevated flap. The gingival margin is re-
urements of 1.34 mm for sulcus depth; positioned coronally to conserve soft tis-
1.14 mm for epithelial attachment; and sue. Type IV esthetic crown lengthening
0.77 mm for connective tissue attach- is required when inadequate attached
ment.21 Esthetic crown lengthening is gingiva is present. An apically pos-
categorized as being either Type I, II, itioned flap is required with a definitive
III, or IV. In Type I cases, there is suf- margin, and provisional construction ac-
ficient attached gingiva coronal to the complished at a later date.
osseous crest, and the need for osse- For this patient, a Type III one-stage
ous recontouring is therefore obviated. surgical crown lengthening procedure
A simple gingivectomy that simultane- was selected as being the most benefi-
ously sculpts, contours and maintains cial. According to Sonick et al,23 a sin-
appropriate zeniths may be all that is gle-stage crown lengthening procedure
required.22 Type II crown lengthening often results in a 1 to 3 mm rebound of
is categorized by gingival proportions the free gingival margin 6 months to 1
that permit an apical positioning of the year post-surgery. This would especially
gingival margin, do not reveal the osse- apply to patients with a thick biotype.
ous crest, but violate the biologic width. The procedure allowed for the gingivec-
352
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
TRUSHKOWSKY ET AL
References
1. Jorgensen MG, Nowzari 6. Coslet JG, Vanarsdall R, 11. Dutra, MB, Ritter DE, Borgat-
H. Aesthetic crown length- Weisgold A. Diagnosis and to A, Derech CDA, Rocha R.
ening. Periodontol 2000 classification of delayed pas- Influence of gingival expo-
2001;27:45–58. sive eruption of the dentog- sure on the smile esthet-
2. Garber DA, Salama MA. The ingival junction in the adult. ics. Dental Press J Orthod
aesthetic smile: diagnosis Alpha Omegan 1977;70:24– 2011;16:111–118.
and treatment. Periodontol 28. 12. Oshagh M, Moghadam T,
2000 1996;11:18–28. 7. Gurrea J, Bruguera A. Wax- Dashlibrun YN. Perceptions
3. de Castro MV, Santos NC, up and mock-up. A guide of laypersons and dentists
Ricardo LH. Assessment of for anterior periodontal and regarding the effect of tooth
the “golden proportion” in restorative treatments. Int J and gingival display on smile
agreeable smiles. Quintes- Esthet Dent 2014;9:146–162. attractiveness in long- and
sence Int 2006;37:597–604. 8. Tjan AH, Miller GD, The short-face individuals. Eur J
4. Landsberg CJ, Sarne O. JG. Some esthetic factors Esthet Dent 2013;8:570–581.
Management of excessive in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 13. Kim SG, Park SS. Incidence
gingival display following 1984;51:24–28. of complications and prob-
adult orthodontic treatment: 9. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. lems related to orthognathic
a case report. Pract Proced The gingival smile line. Angle surgery. J Oral Maxillofac
Aesthet Dent 2006;18:89–94. Orthod 1992;62:91–100. Surg 2007;65:2438–2444.
5. Silberberg N, Goldstein M, 10. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja 14. Robbins JW. Differential
Smidt A. Excessive gin- M. Some vertical linea- diagnosis and treatment
gival display – etiology, ments of lip position. Am J of excess gingival display.
diagnosis, and treatment Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Pract Periodontics Aesthet
modalities. Quintessence Int 1992;101:519–524. Dent 1999;11;265–272.
2009;40:809–818.
353
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
CASE REPORT
15. Humayun N, Kolhatkar S, 18. Polo M. Botulinum toxin type 21. Vacek JS, Gher ME, Assad
Souiyas J, Bhola M. Mucosal A (Botox) for the neuromus- DA, Richardson AC, Giam-
coronally positioned flap for cular correction of excessive barresi LI. The dimensions
the management of exces- gingival display on smil- of the human dentogin-
sive gingival display in the ing (gummy smile). Am J gival junction. Int J Peri-
presence of hypermobility Orthod Dentofacial Orthop odontics Restorative Dent
of the upper lip and verti- 2008;133:195–203. 1994;14:154–165.
cal maxillary excess: a 19. Rosenblatt A, Simon Z. Lip 22. Lee EA. Aesthetic crown
case report. J Periodontol repositioning for reduction of lengthening: classification,
2010;81:1858–1863. excessive gingival display: biologic rationale, and treat-
16. Shu R, Huang L, Bai D. A clinical report. Int J Peri- ment planning considera-
Adult Class II Division 1 odontics Restorative Dent tions. Pract Proced Aesthet
patient with severe gummy 2006;26:433–437. Dent 2004;16:769–778.
smile treated with temporary 20. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, 23. Sonick M. Esthetic crown
anchorage devices. Am J Orban B. Mitotic activity lengthening for maxil-
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop of human oral epithelium lary anterior teeth. Com-
2011;140:97–105. exposed to 30 per cent pend Contin Educ Dent
17. Polo M. Botulinum toxin type hydrogen peroxide. Oral 1997;18:807–812.
A in the treatment of exces- Surg Oral Med Oral Path
sive gingival display. Am J 1961;14:474–492.
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
2005;127:214–218.
354
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./
Copyright of International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry is the property of Quintessence
Publishing Company Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or
posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users
may print, download, or email articles for individual use.