Module6. The Good Life 1
Module6. The Good Life 1
Module6. The Good Life 1
INTRODUCTION
This module covers the concepts and nature of good life. It presents various
learning activities that lead students to a comprehensive understanding about good
life. Students’ activities are provided in every topic to enhance student’s knowledge,
skills and desirable attitudes. It is the goal of this module to provide students a full
grasp of the meaning and conceptions of good life.
After completing the module, you should be able to answer the following:
How did Science and Technology affect the path of toward the attainment of
what it really means to live a good life?
What were the shared concerns among people in the community in attaining
happiness and good life?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
LEARNING CONTENT
The definition of the word “good” depends on various factors and how the
context of life differs to every individual. In this massive world of numerous
inventions as time goes by, science and technology has made life more convenient.
Technological advancements have led to more work opportunities, finances, health,
social and political issues, education and most importantly on daily living. Moreover,
it also opens more legit explanations on society’s’ myths and beliefs making people
to increase their understanding to communities salient matters. However, the
increasing need of attaining good life and happiness has also pressing issues that
may touch our foundations on moral and ethical values.
In Ancient Greece, long before the word “science” has been coined, the need
to understand the world and reality was bound with the need to understand the self
and the good life. For, Plato, the task of understanding the things in the world runs
parallel with the job of truly getting into what will make the soul flourish. In an attempt
to understand reality and the external world, man must seek to understand himself,
too. It is Aristotle who gave a definitive distinction between the theoretical and
practical sciences. Among the theoretical disciplines, Aristotle included logic, biology,
physics, and metaphysics, among others. Among the practical ones, Aristotle
counted ethics and politics. Whereas “truth” is the aim of the theoretical sciences, the
“good” is the end goal of the practical ones. Every attempt to know is connected in
some way to find the “good” or as said “good” is the attainment of human flourishing.
Rightly so, one must find the truth about what the good is before one can even try to
locate that which is good.
In the previous lesson, we have seen how a misplaced or an erroneous idea
of human flourishing can turn tables for all of us, make the sciences work against us
rather than for us, and draw a chasm between the search for truth and for the good.
In this lesson, we endeavour to go back a little and answer these questions: What
does it really mean to live a good life? What qualifies as a good existence? Granting
this understanding, we are assumed to be in a better position to reconcile our
deepest existential needs as human beings and science as tool to maneuver around
the world.
When we win a competition or we eat our favorite dish in a restaurant. What
Aristotle actually means is Human Flourishing, A kind of contentment in knowing that
one is getting the best out of life. A kind of feeling that one has maxed out his
potentials in the world, that he has attained the crux of his humanity.
In the 18th century, John Stuart Mill declared the Greatest Happiness Principle
by saying that an action is right as far as it maximizes the attainment of happiness
for the greatest number of people. At a time when people were skeptical about
claims on metaphysical, people could not make sense of the Human Flourishing that
Aristotle talked about in the days of old. Mill said that individual happiness of each
individual should be prioritized and collectively dictates that the kind of action that
https://www.brainpickings.org/20
Find time to read the article
about Richard Feynman’s, The 12/08/27/richard-feynman-on-
Pleasure to Find Things Out. the-role-of-scientific-culture-in-
modern-society/
READ
Good life Collage: Cut out pictures in magazines or newspapers that demonstrate
how technology has made the man’s desire for a happy life more realizable. You
may also opt to print out pictures from website and other sources. Explain how these
technological advancements have made the campaign for the attainment of good life
easier or otherwise.
Submit your output via
Materialism
The first materialists were the atomists in Ancient Greece. Democritus and
Leucippus led a school whose primary belief is that the World is made up of and is
controlled by the tiny indivisible units in the world called “Atomos” or seeds. For
Democritus and his disciples, the world including human beings, is made up of
matter. Atomos simply comes together randomly to form the things in the World. In
terms of Human Flourishing, matter is what makes us attain happiness. We see this
at work with most people who are clinging on to material wealth as the primary
source of the meaning of their existence.
Hedonism
The Hedonists, for their part, see the end goal of life in acquiring pleasure.
Pleasure has always been the priority of Hedonists. For them, life is about obtaining
and indulging in pleasure because life is limited. The mantra of this school of thought
is the famous, “Eat, Drink and be Merry for Tomorrow We Die.” Led by Epicurus, this
school of thought also does not buy any notion of afterlife just like the materialists.
Stoicism
Another school of thought led by Epicurus, the Stoics espoused the idea that to
generate happiness, one must learn to distance oneself and be apathetic. The
original term, “apatheia”, precisely means to be indifferent. for the Stoics, happiness
Theism
Most people find the meaning of their lives using God as a fulcrum of their
existence. The Philippines, as a predominantly Catholic country, is witness to how
people base their life goals on beliefs that hinged on some form of supernatural
reality called Heaven. The ultimate basis of happiness for this is the Communion with
God. The world where we are in is only just temporary reality where we have to
manoeuvre around while waiting for the ultimate return to the hands of God.
Humanism
Whether or not we agree with these technological advancements, these are all
undertaken in the hopes of attaining the Good Life. The balance, however, between
the Good Life, ethics, and Technology has to be attained.
Compare and Contrast: Identify two modes of doing the same thing where one
involves a more technologically advanced method. Example would be snail mail vs.
e-mail. List down as many examples. Brainstorm with a partner if a less
technologically sophisticated mechanism can actually turn out to be better in terms of
reaching for the good life. Is the more technologically advanced always better?
Submit your output via
ASSESSMENT TASK
Man is constantly in pursuit of the good life. Every person has his
perspective when it comes to what comprises the good life. Throughout
history, man has worked hard in pointing out what amounts to a good,
happy life. Some people like the classical theorists thought that happiness
ha to do with the insides of the human persons. The soul, the seat of our
humanity, has been the focus of attention of this end goal. The soul has to
attain a balance in order to have a good life, a life of flourishing. It was until
the 17th century that happiness became centerpiece in the lives of people,
have been becoming a full blown ethical foundation in John Stuart Mill’s
utilitarianism. At present, we see multitudes of schools of thought that all
promise their own key to finding happiness. Science and technology has
been, for the most part, at the forefront of man’s attempts at finding this
happiness. The only question at the end of the day is whether science is
taking the right path toward attaining what is really means to live a good life.
REFERENCES: