Reflective Gibb's Model
Reflective Gibb's Model
Reflective Gibb's Model
Individual/Group Individual
Length Up to a page
Weighting 20%
Assessment Task
Write a critical argument on the topic selected in Assessment 1 Part A Annotated Bibliography.
Provide supporting evidence for the argument from the resources used in Assessment 1 Part A.
Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.
Context
This assessment has been prescribed to appraise your’ ability to think critically and form an
argument supported by evidence. It allows you to demonstrate your ability to understand the
material you are using and to apply it in ways that go beyond what has been read.
The resources used in Assessment 1 Part A Annotated Bibliography are expected to be utilised in
this assessment to support the argument.
2. Use the annotated bibliography resources from Assessment 1 Part A for sourcing
evidence and ideas for your argument. Review the resources critically and select at
least 5 to be used as references for this assessment.
5. Please use at least 5 in-text citations. Indicate logical connections and use connecting words
6. You are strongly advised to read the rubric, which is an evaluation guide with criteria for
grading your assignment—this will give you a clear picture of what a successful forming an
argument looks like.
Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more
information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
Submission Instructions:
Submit the Forming an Argument document via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in
MGT502: Business Communication.
The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can
be viewed in My Grades.
Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Evaluation of Limited understanding Resembles a recall Supports personal Discriminates between Systematically and
information selected to of key concepts or summary of key opinion and information assertion of personal critically discriminates
support the argument required to support the ideas. substantiated by evidence opinion and between assertion of
argument. from the research/course information personal opinion and
Personal opinion without materials. substantiated by information substantiated
Percentage for this Confuses logic and reflection, expert robust evidence from by robust evidence from
criterion = 50% emotion. Information judgment or rigor, Demonstrates a capacity to the research/course the research/course
taken from reliable unsubstantiated by apply and justify the use of materials and materials and extended
sources but without a evidence from the relevant concepts. extended reading. reading.
coherent analysis or research/course
synthesis. materials. Well demonstrated Information is taken from
capacity apply and justify sources with a high level of
relevant concepts. interpretation/evaluation
to develop a
Analysis and evaluation comprehensive critical
reflect growing analysis or synthesis.
judgement, intellectual
independence, rigor and Exhibits intellectual
adaptability independence, rigor, good
judgement and adaptability.
Correct citation of key Demonstrates inconsistent Demonstrates use of Demonstrates use of credible Demonstrates use of good Demonstrates use of high-
resources and evidence use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and quality, credible and quality, credible and
credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. relevant resources to relevant resources to
resources to support and develop ideas, but these support and develop support and develop
Percentage for this develop ideas are not always explicit or arguments and arguments and position
criterion = 35% well developed. statements. statements.