FINA6000 Asssessment 2 Brief Individual Presentation. (With Tasks)
FINA6000 Asssessment 2 Brief Individual Presentation. (With Tasks)
FINA6000 Asssessment 2 Brief Individual Presentation. (With Tasks)
Individual/Group Individual
Weighting 15%
Task Summary
Students are expected to utilise publicly available financial market information and prepare an
efficient frontier of two assets which are shares of companies listed on the Australian Securities
Exchange. They must apply the concepts of risk, return and portfolio diversification.
Students are expected to prepare 10 - 12 ppt slides and record a 15 minutes presentation addressing
the assessment tasks.
• Testing the students’ understanding of the concepts of risk and return, and their ability to
evaluate how stocks (shares) have been affected by the emergence of the COVID-19
pandemic.
• Assessing students’ ability to determine stock mean returns, standard deviation, covariance
and correlation
• Construct portfolios consisting of two assets and determine their returns and standard
deviation.
• Assessing students’ ability to construct an efficient portfolio frontier.
Assessment Tasks:
Task 1
Your Facilitator will allocate to you, a pair of companies drawn from ASX100 companies which are
listed on the Australia Securities Exchange (ASX). The list is below the Marking Rubric. You should
download daily (closing) stock prices from yahoo finance (https://au.finance.yahoo.com/) for the
period 10 March 2020 to 10 March 2021. Calculate daily returns, standard deviation and coefficient
of correlation between the returns of these two stocks. (15 marks)
Task 2
Using various proportions (weights), prepare a table that reports the mean return, variance and
standard deviation of each portfolio. Identify the minimum variance portfolio from the table.
(15 marks)
Task 3
Using the information in Task 2, construct an efficient portfolio frontier. (7.5 marks)
Task 4
Critique the use of standard deviation as a measure of risk and suggest two alternative measures of
risk that could be used. You should not use beta in your answer. (7.5 marks)
Submission Instructions:
Submit this task via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in the FINA6000 Managing
Finance folder. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal.
Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is
my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy
and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au
Content, Audience and Purpose Demonstrates no Demonstrates limited Demonstrates consistent Demonstrates an advanced Consistently demonstrates a
(broad and specific content) awareness of context awareness of context awareness of context and integrated systematic and critical
Students should show an and/or purpose of and/or purpose of the and/or purpose of the understanding of context understanding of context
understanding of the essence of the assignment. assignment assignment. and/or purpose of the and purpose of the
the assignment, the central assignment. assignment.
idea(s) to be addressed and
pitch the presentation
accordingly
5%
Analysis and application with Limited synthesis and Demonstrated analysis Well-developed analysis Thoroughly developed and Highly sophisticated and
synthesis of new knowledge analysis. and synthesis of new and synthesis with creative analysis and creative analysis, synthesis
application of synthesis with application of
General criterion to adapt: Limited application/ knowledge with recommendations linked to pretested models and / or of new with existing
recommendations application. analysis/synthesis. independently developed knowledge.
Ability to analyse and interpret based upon analysis. models and justified
Strong application by way of
the information correctly in Shows the ability to recommendations linked to
pretested models and / or
identifying the minimum variance interpret relevant analysis/synthesis.
independently developed
portfolio. Critically discussing information and models. Recommendations
alternative risk measures to literature. are clearly justified based on
standard deviation (excluding the analysis/synthesis.
beta) Applying knowledge to new
situations/other cases.
15%
Excellent presentation which is Difficult to Information, arguments Information, arguments Information, arguments and Expertly presented; the
well structured, flowing, understand for and evidence are and evidence are well evidence are very well presentation is logical,
informative, relevant and audience, no presented in a way that presented, mostly clear presented; the presentation persuasive, and well
logical/clear is not always clear and flow of ideas and is logical, clear and well supported by evidence,
supported by properly prepared
structure, poor flow logical. arguments. supported by evidence. demonstrating a clear flow
visual aids of ideas and arguments.
of ideas, argument
lacks supporting Line of reasoning is often Line of reasoning is easy to Demonstrates cultural
30% Engages and sustains
evidence. difficult to follow. follow. sensitivity. audience’s interest in the
topic, demonstrates high
Audience cannot levels of cultural sensitivity
follow the line of
reasoning. Effective use of diverse
presentation aids, including
graphics and multi-media.
Correct citation of key resources Demonstrates Demonstrates use of Demonstrates use of high Demonstrates use of good Demonstrates use of
and evidence inconsistent use of credible and relevant quality, credible and quality, credible and highquality, credible and
good quality, credible resources to support and relevant resources to relevant resources to relevant resources to
5% and relevant develop ideas, but these support and develop support and develop support and develop
resources to support are not always explicit or ideas. arguments and statements. arguments and position
and develop ideas. well developed. Shows evidence of wide statements. Shows evidence
scope within the of wide scope within and
organisation for sourcing without the organisation for
evidence sourcing evidence