Makati Stock Exchange Vs Campos
Makati Stock Exchange Vs Campos
Makati Stock Exchange Vs Campos
CONTRACT.
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:
DOCTRINE:
An obligation is a juridical relation whereby a person (called the creditor)
may demand from another (called the debtor) the observance of a
determinative conduct (the giving, doing or not doing), and in case of breach,
may demand satisfaction from the assets of the latter.Therefore, an obligation
imposed on a person, and the corresponding right granted to another, must
be rooted in at least one of these five sources. The mere assertion of a right
and claim of an obligation in an initiatory pleading, whether a Complaint or
Petition, without identifying the basis or source thereof, is merely a
conclusion of fact and law. A pleading should state the ultimate facts essential
to the rights of action or defense asserted, as distinguished from mere
conclusions of fact or conclusions of law.10 Thus, a Complaint or Petition filed
by a person claiming a right to the Office of the President of this Republic, but
without stating the source of his purported right, cannot be said to have
sufficiently stated a cause of action. Also, a person claiming to be the owner of
a parcel of land cannot merely state that he has a right to the ownership
thereof, but must likewise assert in the Complaint either a mode of acquisition
of ownership or at least a certificate of title in his name.
FACTS:
Respondent Miguel V. Campos filed a petition with the Securities,
Investigation and Clearing Department (SICD) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) against the petitioners Makati Stock Exchange, Inc.
(MKSE) The petition sought: (1) to nullify the Resolution dated 3 June 1993 of
the MKSE Board of Directors, which allegedly deprived him of his right to
participate equally in the allocation of Initial Public Offerings (IPO) of
corporations registered with MKSE; (2) the delivery of the IPO shares he was
allegedly deprived of, for which he would pay IPO prices;.
SICD granted the issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order to enjoin
petitioners from implementing or enforcing the resolution of the MKSE. they
also issued a writ of preliminary injunction for the implementation or
enforcement of the MKSE Board Resolution in question.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the petitioner has the obligation
HELD:
Article 1157 of the Civil Code, provides that Obligations arise from: law,
Contracts, Quasi Contracts, Acts or omissions punished by law and quasi
delicts. Therefore an obligation imposed on a person and the corresponding
right granted to another, must be rooted in at least one of these five sources.
The Respondent merely quoted in his Petition the MKSE Board Resolution,
passed sometime in 1989, granting him the position of Chairman Emeritus of
MKSE for life. However, there is nothing in the said Petition from which the
Court can deduce that respondent, by virtue of his position as Chairman
Emeritus of MKSE, was granted by law, contract, or any other legal source,
the right to subscribe to the IPOs of corporations listed in the stock market at
their offering prices.