Ieeja Draft DPR (27.10.17) PDF

$%% & ' (
!"#
CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 8
1.1 Introduction to the Project ............................................................................................. 8

1.2 Problem Associated with Solid Waste Management ..................................................... 8
1.3 Status of Solid Waste Management ............................................................................. 10
1.4 Present Context ............................................................................................................ 12
1.5 Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 13
1.6 Scope of Work .............................................................................................................. 13
1.7 Project Area .................................................................................................................. 15
CHAPTER 2. PROFILE OF IEEJA URBAN LOCAL BODY ............................................................... 17
2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 17

2.2 Location ........................................................................................................................ 17
2.3 Climate .......................................................................................................................... 17
2.4 Physiography and Landform ......................................................................................... 17
2.5 Flora and Fauna ............................................................................................................ 17
2.6 Planning Area................................................................................................................ 17
2.7 Demographic profile ..................................................................................................... 18
2.8 Trade and Commerce ................................................................................................... 19
2.9 Physical Planning and Growth Aspects......................................................................... 19
CHAPTER 3. ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ............. 22
3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 22

3.2 Sources of Municipal Solid Waste ................................................................................ 22
3.3 Collection and Transportation system ......................................................................... 23
3.1.1 Primary Collection System .............................................................................................. 23
3.1.2 Secondary Collection Scenario ........................................................................................ 24
3.1.3 Transportation................................................................................................................. 24
3.1.4 Disposal of Solid Waste ................................................................................................... 24
3.4 Institutional Profile ....................................................................................................... 25
3.5 Deficiency Analysis ....................................................................................................... 25
CHAPTER 4. WASTE QUANTIFICATION & CHARACTERIZATION ............................................... 35
4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 35

DPR on MSWM for Ieeja ULB Draft DPR
4.2 Quantification of Waste ............................................................................................... 35

4.1.1 MSW Survey .................................................................................................................... 35
4.1.2 Residential ....................................................................................................................... 35
4.1.3 Commercial ..................................................................................................................... 36
4.1.4 Street Sweeping .............................................................................................................. 37
4.1.5 Drain Silt and other waste ............................................................................................... 37
4.3 Summary of Waste Generation .................................................................................... 37
4.4 Collection Efficiency of Ieeja......................................................................................... 38
4.5 Future Generation Trends ............................................................................................ 38
4.6 Waste Characterization and Physical Composition of Waste ...................................... 39
CHAPTER 5. PLANNING FOR INTEGRATED MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN

THE ULB ............................................................................................................................. 41
5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 41

5.2 Future Population or Population Projections ............................................................... 41
5.3 Per Capita Waste Generation & Projection .................................................................. 42
5.4 Municipal Solid Waste Management Plan (MSWMP): ................................................. 42
5.5 CLUSTER FOR JOGIMAMBA-GADWAL DISTRICT ........................................................... 44
5.6 Aspects under the Cluster Approach ............................................................................ 45
5.6.1 Waste Quantities............................................................................................................. 45
5.6.2 Transportation of Waste ................................................................................................. 46
5.6.3 Area Availability .............................................................................................................. 46
5.6.4 NIMBY.............................................................................................................................. 46
5.6.5 Ownership of Common Facility ....................................................................................... 46
5.6.6 Form of Waste being transported ................................................................................... 46
5.7 Concept planning .......................................................................................................... 47
5.8 Gadwal Cluster # 1 ........................................................................................................ 48
CHAPTER 6. PROPOSED SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN............... 49
6.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 49

6.2 Overview of the Recommended C&T Plan ................................................................... 49
6.3 Segregation and Storage of Waste at Source ............................................................... 50
6.3.1 Segregation of waste at Source ...................................................................................... 50
6.3.2 Storage of Waste at Source ............................................................................................. 50
6.4 Planning of Collection and Transportation System ...................................................... 51
Page 1
6.4.1 Primary Collection of Waste............................................................................................ 51

6.4.2 Street-sweeping .............................................................................................................. 54
6.4.3 Drain cleaning.................................................................................................................. 55
6.4.4 Secondary Storage .......................................................................................................... 55
6.4.5 Domestic Hazardous Waste collection Centre ................................................................ 55
6.4.6 Secondary Collection and Transportation....................................................................... 55
6.5 Infrastructure Required for Achieving 100% Collection and Transportation System .. 56
6.6 Workshop Facility for Vehicle Maintenance ................................................................ 57
CHAPTER 7. DESIGN AND PLANNING OF TREATMENT PLANT ................................................. 58
7.1 Integrated Waste Treatment Facility............................................................................ 58

7.1.1 Site Description ............................................................................................................... 58
7.1.2 Area Statement ............................................................................................................... 58
7.2 Land Reclamation from Old Dumpsites ........................................................................ 59
7.3 Planning and Design of Treatment Plant ...................................................................... 59
7.3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 59
7.3.2 Identification of Suitable MSW Treatment Technology .................................................. 59
7.3.3 Material Balance ............................................................................................................. 68
7.3.4 Dry waste Collection Centers (DRCC):-............................................................................ 69
7.3.5 Design of Pre-sorting & RDF Plant................................................................................... 69
7.3.6 Design of Compost Plant ................................................................................................. 73
7.3.7 Construction Specifications and Functions of All the Compost Plant facilities ............... 77
7.3.8 Design of Compost Plant ................................................................................................. 78
7.3.9 List of Processing Machineries & Equipments (Mechanical) .......................................... 79
7.3.10 Market Price of Compost ............................................................................................ 81
7.3.11 Performance standards for compost .......................................................................... 81
CHAPTER 8. PLANNING AND DESIGN OF SANITARY LANDFILL ................................................ 83
8.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 83

8.2 Proposed Landfill Site Description................................................................................ 83
8.3 MoEF Guidelines for Landfill Design ............................................................................. 83
8.4 Design of Landfill and Landfill Sizing............................................................................. 85
8.5 Supporting infrastructure ............................................................................................. 87
CHAPTER 9. PROJECT COSTING ................................................................................................ 88
9.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 88
Page 2
9.2 Total Capital Cost of the project ................................................................................... 88

9.3 Capital Cost of MSW Collection & Transportation ....................................................... 88
9.4 Operation & Maintenance cost of MSW Collection & Transportation ........................ 89
9.5 Capital Cost of Integrated Treatment Facility (Compost & RDF) .................................. 91
9.5.1 Cost of Civil infra for treatment plant & Site Development Works for Integrated facility
91
9.5.2 Cost of Equipment & waste handling for Waste treatment facility. ............................... 92
9.5.3 Operation and Maintenance of Waste treatment plant ................................................. 93
9.6 Capital Cost of Landfill Facility at Integrated Treatment facility .................................. 94
9.6.1 Cost of landfill facility ...................................................................................................... 94
9.6.2 Operation & Maintenance of Landfill Facility ................................................................. 95
9.7 Financial Framework .................................................................................................... 96
9.7.1 Objective of Swachh Bharat Mission............................................................................... 96
9.7.2 Swachh Bharat Mission Components.............................................................................. 96
9.8 Funding Pattern for the Project .................................................................................... 96
9.9 Source of Finance ......................................................................................................... 96
9.9.1 Financing Capital cost of the scheme .............................................................................. 97
9.10 Municipal Financial Strength ........................................................................................ 97
9.11 Revenue Stream ........................................................................................................... 98
9.12 Revenue generation from Households & Other commercial Establishments. ............ 98
9.13 Revenue generation from Sale of Compost & RDF ...................................................... 99
9.14 Revenue generation from Sale of Recyclables ............................................................. 99
9.15 Total Revenues ........................................................................................................... 100
9.16 Tipping Fee calculation ............................................................................................... 100
9.17 Project Structuring...................................................................................................... 102
9.17.1 Possible PPP Options ................................................................................................ 102
9.17.2 Project Financing Options ......................................................................................... 106
9.17.3 Procurement process for PPP Projects ..................................................................... 108
9.17.4 Appraisal and monitoring by Lead Financial Institution ........................................... 108
9.17.5 Disbursement of Grant ............................................................................................. 109
9.17.6 India Infrastructure Project Development Fund (IIPDF) ........................................... 109
CHAPTER 10. INFORMATION, EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION (IEC).......................... 111
10.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 111

10.2 Identification and Orientation of Resident’s Welfare Committees:........................... 112
Page 3
10.3 Identification and Mobilization of NGOs or Social Welfare Groups NGO Involvement113
10.4 Use of Schools and Colleges ....................................................................................... 114
10.5 Orientation of Key Personalities, Social Activists and Policy Makers Involvement of
Professional Communicators ..................................................................................... 115
10.6 Conduct Sanitation Campaigns................................................................................... 115
10.7 Media Campaigning and Environmental Awareness.................................................. 117
10.8 Capacity Building Methods ......................................................................................... 119
10.9 Capacity Building in Solid Waste Management .......................................................... 119
10.10 Strategic Framework for Capacity Building ................................................................ 119
10.11 Training Needs ............................................................................................................ 119
10.12 Proposed Course Contents for Training ..................................................................... 120
10.13 Management Information System ............................................................................. 121
10.14 Monitoring of SWM Services: ..................................................................................... 123
10.14.1 Daily Reports ............................................................................................................. 123
10.14.2 Monitoring and Evaluation of Daily Reports............................................................. 126
CHAPTER 11. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN ......................................................... 127
11.1 Objective..................................................................................................................... 127

11.2 Environmental Management Plan .............................................................................. 127
11.2.1 Construction Phase ................................................................................................... 127
11.2.2 Operation Phase ....................................................................................................... 127
11.3 Air Pollution Control ................................................................................................... 128
11.4 Odour Control ............................................................................................................. 129
11.5 Landfill Gas Management ........................................................................................... 130
11.6 Water Pollution Control & Management ................................................................... 131
11.7 Leachate Management Plan ....................................................................................... 132
11.8 Solar Evaporation Pond .............................................................................................. 133
11.9 Sludge Management................................................................................................... 133
11.10 Capping of Landfill ...................................................................................................... 133
11.11 Management of Flora & Fauna ................................................................................... 135
11.12 Control of Noise Pollution .......................................................................................... 135
11.13 Environmental Control during Composting Process .................................................. 135
11.14 Occupational Health Management ............................................................................ 136
11.14.1 Medical Check-up of Workers................................................................................... 136
11.14.2 First Aid of Facilities .................................................................................................. 136
Page 4
11.15 Fire Protection System ............................................................................................... 136

11.15.1 Hydrant Systems ....................................................................................................... 136
11.16 Green Belt Development ............................................................................................ 136
11.17 Environmental Management Cell ............................................................................... 137
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1: List of ULBs – Project Area ................................................................................................... 15

Table 2-1: Population Growth Trends in Ieeja ...................................................................................... 18
Table 2-2: Details of Sex Ratio in Ieeja .................................................................................................. 18
Table 2-3: Work Participation in Ieeja .................................................................................................. 18
Table 2-4: Growth of Housing in Ieeja Town ........................................................................................ 19
Table 2-5: Population Projections ......................................................................................................... 21
Table 3-1: Source of Waste generators ................................................................................................ 22
Table 3-2: Inventory of vehicles ............................................................................................................ 24
Table 3-3: Deficiency Analysis ............................................................................................................... 25
Table 3-4: Timelines for Implementation ............................................................................................. 33
Table 4-1: Quantification Survey Details of Household ........................................................................ 36
Table 4-2: Total Garbage Generation for Households .......................................................................... 36
Table 4-3: Total Garbage generation for Commercial Establishments ................................................. 37
Table 4-4: Waste generation from Road sweeping .............................................................................. 37
Table 4-5: Total Waste Generated ....................................................................................................... 38
Table 4-6: Waste Projections ................................................................................................................ 38
Table 4-7: Physical Composition of Waste............................................................................................ 39
Table 4-8: Chemical composition of Waste .......................................................................................... 40
Table 6-1: Elements of Storage ............................................................................................................. 51
Table 6-2: Requirements of Bins at Municipality .................................................................................. 51
Table 6-3: Door to door Collection from Households ........................................................................... 52
Table 6-4: Door to Door Collection from Commercial Establishments................................................. 53
Table 6-5: Infrastructure Required ....................................................................................................... 53
Table 6-6: Street Sweeping Requirements ........................................................................................... 54
Table 6-7: Drain Cleaning Requirements .............................................................................................. 55
Table 6-8: Domestic hazardous waste centers ..................................................................................... 55
Table 6-9: Secondary Collection and Transportation ........................................................................... 56
Page 5
Table 6-10: Existing vehicles with ULB .................................................................................................. 56

Table 6-11: Requirement of vehicles and Equipment........................................................................... 56
Table 6-12: Required Staff for SWM ..................................................................................................... 56
Table 7-1: Area Statement .................................................................................................................... 59
Table 7-2: Processing Technologies ...................................................................................................... 60
Table 7-3: Material Balance .................................................................................................................. 68
Table 7-4: Waste Receiving Platform .................................................................................................... 72
Table 7-5: List of Processing Machineries & Equipments (Mechanical) ............................................... 73
Table 7-6: Mobile Equipment for Presorting and RDF Plant Operations .............................................. 73
Table 7-7: Windrow Platform ............................................................................................................... 79
Table 7-8: Equipments Required For Compost Plant ............................................................................ 80
Table 8-1: Layer Configuration Is Proposed for the Bottom of the Landfill .......................................... 84
Table 9-1: Total Project Cost Break-Up ................................................................................................. 88
Table 9-2: Funding Pattern ................................................................................................................... 96
Table 11-1: Air Pollution Control Measures ........................................................................................ 128
Table 11-2: Waste water Generation Details in m3/day ..................................................................... 131
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1: Past and projected Trend of Per capita Waste Generation ................................................ 10
Figure 1-2: Status of Solid Waste Management in Various Indian Cities ............................................. 11
Figure 5-1: Gadwal Cluster .................................................................................................................... 48
Figure 7-1: Existing Dump Site Pictures ................................................................................................ 58
Figure 7-2: Material balance ................................................................................................................. 68
Figure 7-3: Typical Shredders................................................................................................................ 70
Figure 7-4: Typical RDF Bailers .............................................................................................................. 70
Figure 7-5: Flow of compost process .................................................................................................... 75
Figure 8-1: Base Liner System of Landfill .............................................................................................. 84
Figure 11-1: Gas Flaring System .......................................................................................................... 131
Figure 11-2: Leachate Management Plan ........................................................................................... 132
Figure 11-3: Sizes of the Tanks............................................................................................................ 133
Figure 11-4: Organization Chart .......................................................................................................... 137
Page 6
ABBREVIATION
CDMA Commissioner and Directorate of Municipal Administration

CPHEEO Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organization
C&D Construction and Demolition
C&T Collection and Transportation

DPR Detailed Project Report
EHS Environment, Health and Safety
GoI Government of India

HH Households
IEC Information, Education and Communication
KG Kilogram
MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forest
MoUD Ministry of Urban Development
MSW Municipal Solid Waste
MSWM Municipal Solid Waste Management
O&M Operation and Maintenance
P&D Processing and Disposal

RDF Refuse Derived Fuel
SBM Swach Bharat Mission

SLM Service Level Benchmark
TPD Tons per day
TUFIDC Telangana Urban Finance and Infrastructure Development Limited
ULB Urban Local Body

WtE Waste to Energy
Page 7
Executive Summary of DPR for MSWM in Ieeja
I. Introduction
Municipal Solid Waste Management is the application of principle of Integrated Solid Waste
management (ISWM) to municipal waste. ISWM is the application of suitable techniques,
technologies and management programs covering all types of solid wastes from all sources to
achieve the twin objectives of (a) waste reduction and (b) effective management of waste still
produced after waste reduction.
Municipal Solid Waste management is important as it impacts health, environment and

aesthetic society if it is not managed properly. In this context, the Government of Telangana
(GoTS) proposes to strengthen the Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) system
covering collection, segregation, recycling, transportation processing and disposal including
options for composting and waste to energy, disposal in all 72 Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) in
Telangana (except GHMC) so as to comply with the service level benchmarks of the Government
of India.
The GoTS intends to institutionalize a holistic Integrated, sustainable environment and eco-
friendly MSWM System in the urban local bodies (ULBs) of the state in turn with SBM launched
by GoI and Swachh Telangana announced by Government of Telangana. Thereby improving the
living standards of the state population and boosting the economy of the state.
C&MDA is the Mission Directorate for the Swachh Telangana – Swachh Bharat Mission which
proposes preparation of Detailed Project Reports for the 72 ULBs and also cluster-wise through
the TUFIDC. The 72 ULBs in the state are divided into 2 Regions (Hyderabad and Warangal) for
geographical convenience for conducting studies & preparation of DPRs. Separate DPRs are
prepared for each ULB including the existing practices of MSW management, inadequacies and
approaches for improvement of waste management within the policy, programmes & legal
framework.
II. Profile of Ieeja

Ieeja was previously a region of the Raichur district under Karnataka. The town was previously
under Mahabubnagar but after district re-organisation, it is included in Gadwal district.
Population 27921 people in 2011

Area 8.0 sq km
Total Length of City The total length of roads in Ieeja town is 20 km. The total length
Roads and drainage of drainage in Ieeja town is 16 km.
Transportation The town connects Kurnool in Andhra Pradesh with Raichur in

Karnataka.
Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page i

Climate & Rainfall The climate of the district is generally hot. As per climatic
conditions of the district, the year may be divided into four
seasons. The South-west monsoons extend from June to
September and the North-east monsoon follows up to the end of
December. The cold season is from December to February.
Temples Ieeja has a well, in which the water tastes of 7 types. There are no
prominent heritage and tourism spots within the town or vicinity.
Administrative Setup The total area of the town is divided into 20 election wards for
administrative purposes.
Literacy Rate 47.13 % during 2011.

Population Forecast Type 2016 2021 2031 2041
projections
Arithmetic Method 30306 32691 37461 42231
Geometric Method 30997 34411 42409 52266
Incremental
30638 33578 40121 47552
Increase Method
III. Assessment of Existing Solid Waste Management
There are different sources in Municipality which are contributing to the municipal solid waste.
These sources include
S. No Type of Waste Generators Number

1 Households 6650
2 Commercial Establishments 750
3 Hotels and Restaurants 11
4 Markets 1
5 Hospital/Clinic 6
6 Schools and institutions 53
The waste which is being generated in this ULB is transported for disposal with the help of 7
Rickshaws. The total waste transported to the dumping yard is 4.2 MT per day. A total waste
generated is transported with these vehicles on a daily basis.
The final functional element in the solid waste management system is disposal. The solid waste
generated from different sources is collected by the sanitary workers and thus transported to
the disposal site. Sanitary Landfill is a standard method practiced for dumping waste in a
scientific manner, in most of the Municipality’s its open dumping into the site without practicing
the prescribed procedure as per MSW rules 2016, Ieeja Municipality is not an exception in this
case.
The waste collected is dumped without any segregation or treatment on road side at B.C Colony.
Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page ii

Sanitation Section
The total number of sanctioned posts in Ieeja ULB is 135, against which 96 posts are filled. The
remaining 39 posts are vacant.
IV. Waste Quantification & Characterization

Quantification of municipal waste generation was carried out separately in the ULB’s of Zone 1
for different sources of generation such as residential, commercial, institutional, street
sweeping and drain cleaning, markets, slaughter houses, function halls, cinema halls, etc.
covering a larger size of population. The sampling points are further classified based on
economic status of population such as high, middle and low income group, uniformly.
M/s. FEEDBACK has conducted survey of for assessment of waste from different sources of
waste generators like households, commercial establishments, hotels, institutes parks, street
sweeping etc. The total waste generation at Ieeja 10.55 MT and the per capita generation is
calculated as 340.4 gm/capita/day.
Particulars of Waste Generation

S. No Type of waste Waste Generation per ton Percentage (%)
1 Domestic source waste generated (in tons) 6.20 59
2 Shops/Malls/Complexes 2.39 23
3 Markets 0.60 6
4 Hospital 0.45 4
5 Hotels 0.46 4
6 Street Sweeping 0.17 2
7 Drain Silt 0.28 3
Total Waste Generated Per Day (in tons) 10.55 100
Source: Estimates based on primary survey
Daily 2 trips are made by Rickshaws. The total waste transported to the dumping yard is 4.2 MT
per day, which is translated to 42% of the collection efficiency.
About 10 kg of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is collected from 10 locations from outside and
inside of the solid waste heap of mixed waste. The total quantity of waste so collected is
thoroughly mixed and then reduced by method of quartering till a sample of such a size is
obtained which can be handled personally. The sample so obtained is subjected to physical
analysis. The Physical Characteristics like moisture content, density, percentage of different
components, such as, paper, plastic, glass, metal, organic matter, sand, soil, bricks, stones etc.,
were calculated.
Physical Composition of Waste
Item Item wise Generation %
ORGANIC WASTE 51
RECYCLABLES 17
COMBUSTIBLE 17
INERT MATTER 15
TOTAL 100
Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page iii

The Chemical Characteristics like pH, percentage of Nitrogen, Potassium and phosphorus, total
carbon and C/N ratio were analyzed and represented in the report. Calorific value of the
municipal solid waste (in Kcal), Toxic characteristics were also analyzed by conducting laboratory
tests on the survey samples of Ieeja. The details of chemical composition are provided
Chemical Composition of Solid Waste

No. Parameters UOM Results
1 Moisture Content % 24.8
2 Volatile solids % 46.9
3 pH -- 8.46
4 EC dS/m 1362
5 Total Organic C % dm 19.5
6 Total N % dm 0.8
7 Total P % dm 0.8
8 Total K % dm 0.86
9 C:N Ratio -- 22:1
10 GCV K.cal/kg 1628
11 Bulk Density gm/cc 0.46
12 Ash Content % 46.1
13 Zinc as Zn2+ mg/kg 410
14 Copper as Cu2+ mg/kg 148
15 Cadmium as Cd2+ mg/kg 3.8
16 Lead as Pb2+ mg/kg 48.3
17 Nickel as Ni+ mg/kg 9.4
18 Chromium as Cr3+ mg/kg 34.2
V. Planning for Integrated MSW Management System in ULB
The MSWM plan is prepared depending on the existing plan for the ULB and the size of the area.
This plan is prepared for a tenure, based on the population projection for the ULB and should be
reviewed periodically.
The factors which are considered in preparation of the MSWM plan

1. Future population or population projection
2. Per capita waste generated based on field survey & waste projections, as per CPHEEO
manual
3. Characterization of the waste based on analysis
4. Applicable laws, rules and regulations for MSW
5. Institutional & financial structuring of the ULB’s
6. Community participation & development
Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page iv

7. Collection & transportation technologies

8. Land availability
9. Suitable technology for MSW processing based on ISWM hierarchy
Estimating future waste generation quantities and composition is critical for developing MSWM
plan. The population projections considered in the CPHEEO Manual have been made after
studying the population growth trend from 1981 onwards. This has been an important step in
order to bridge the gap between demand & supply demand and also to estimate the future
requirement of the ULB.
The Geometric Increase Method is adopted wherein a decadal average is considered as the
growth rate.
Waste Generation & Projection

Qty of waste Per annum Waste Per capita with 1.3% increase
Year every year in kg/c/day
(MT) Generation in Tons
2016 65.76 24002 0.554
2021 78.94 28812 0.591
2031 113.74 41514 0.672
2041 163.88 59816 0.765
MSW management plan for the ULB comprises of different components as below based on the
population and the waste generation. This is as per the CPHEEO manual of MoUD.
• Collection and Transportation

• Treatment plant for processing of waste and resource recovery facility
• Safe disposal by means of sanitary landfill.
Primary
Decentralized/
doorsteps Secondary Bulk
Waste centralized
segregated collection place, transportation,
Population Tones / processing,
collection equipment and landfill
day recovery &
equipment and vehicles Disposal
recycling
Vehicles
50,000 to 10-30 80% door-to-door 100% street 50% decentralized Inert street
TPD collection through sweeping waste processing of sweeping, silt
1,00,000 covered LCV to be collected in waste if suitable from the drains,
containerized space is available and residual
20% door-to-door handcarts and waste from
collection through deposited in 3- If no space, processing
containerized 4m3 containers domestic and plants to be
tricycles or trade waste to be landfilled
handcarts from Containers to be processed at
narrow lanes placed at 4 per centralized facility
km2 area or 1 per with resource
Direct 5,000
Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page v

Primary
Decentralized/
doorsteps Secondary Bulk
Waste centralized
segregated collection place, transportation,
Population Tones / processing,
collection equipment and landfill
day recovery &
equipment and vehicles Disposal
recycling
Vehicles
transportation of population. recovery.
waste to
processing facility Containers to be
if distance is lifted by
under 5km, or tractors/ twin
transportation bin dumper
through placers
compactors if
distance of
processing
facility is longer
Proposed Solid Waste Collection and Transportation Plan
The proposed SWM system is broadly based on 3R Environmental Protection Rules (Recycle,
Reuse, and Recover) and is in accordance with the MSW 2016 Rules. The primary aspects of the
proposed plan include
Gadwal Cluster # 1
A regional Landfill facility at Gadwal is proposed for processing rejects from Gadwal and Ieeja. The waste
is processed at the respective ULB’s and inerts / rejects only are disposed at the Secured Landfill Facility
Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page vi

being proposed at Sheety Atmakur. Hence this SLF can be termed as a Regional Landfill Facility (RLF) as it
caters to the waste disposal of the district.
Composting & Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) >>> I N E R T S >>> Secured Landfill Facility (SLF)
Collection and transportation is the most important component of the SWM operations. The efficiency
of operations is mainly depends on choices of vehicle & equipment. The suggestions are mainly for:
 Promotion of the practice of segregation and storage of waste at source in THREE bins-
for Wet waste, dry waste and for domestic Hazardous waste, so as to facilitate an
organized and hierarchical system of waste collection and disposal, without letting the
waste to reach the ground in the primary and secondary collection stages.
 Organization of door to door collection with community participation on cost recovery
basis and minimize the multiple handling of waste, improvement in the productivity of
labour and equipment
 Containerized secondary storage facilities phasing out open storage
 Daily transportation of waste to the Treatment Plant.
 Creation of awareness for source segregation and storage at source.
 Monitoring the system to increase the productivity
Segregation of waste is proposed into 3 bins as per the MSW rules 2016 into 3 fractions without
mixing them
Category 1 Food & Green Cooked/uncooked food, vegetable, fruit, meat, borne, fish
waste (wet waste) waste, leaves, grass
Category 2 Recyclable & Non- Paper, Plastics, glass, metal, ceramic, rubber, leather, rags,
bio-degradable used cloths, wood, stone, sand, ash, thermocol, straw &
(dry waste) packing materials, sanitary napkins and diapers (to be packed
and disposed)
Category 3 Domestic batteries, expired medicines, bulbs etc.
Hazardous waste
Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page vii

A 3-bin system of storage of waste is suggested by MoEFCC in its solid waste management
guidelines. However, such a system of segregation in the initial stages of waste management is
difficult for the community to practice. However, a single bin system could be upgraded to a 2-
bin system progressively. A total of 13310 bins are required for the municipality for storage of
waste.
The details of infrastructure required for achieving 100% collection and transportation of waste
in the municipality are as follows
Requirement of Vehicles & Equipment

S. No Vehicle/Equipment Existing Required Shortfall
1 Tricycles 4 7 3
2. Auto-tippers 0 7 7
3 Tractors 0 1 1
4 250 lit bins 0 7 7
5 Litter bins 0 23 23
6 600lit for domestic hazardous waste 2 2
7 Wheelbarrows 0 8 8
The above infrastructure/vehicles are proposed based on primary collection and secondary
collection. The manpower requirement for driving the vehicles and lifting the garbage is based
on shifts. The total work force required in the primary and secondary collections are formulated
in the below table.
Required Staff for SWM
Vehicles No. of Vehicles Staff per vehicle Shifts Total staff

Tricycles 7 1 1 7
Auto-tippers 7 3 1 21
Sweepers 15.00 1 1 15
Tractors 3 5 1 15
Total field Staff 58
With weekly off 64
Each worker will be provided with a broom and a dustpan for waste collection and adequate
Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE).
 Number of brooms required- 17

 Number of dustpans required - 17
 Number of pair of gloves - 64
 Number of pair of boots - 64
 Number of uniform – 128 (A uniform for a worker will include two sets of uniform for
summers and two sets for winters).
VI. Design & Planning of Treatment Plan
Ieeja Municipality is generating approximately 10 tons of municipal solid waste (MSW) per day,
Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page viii

which is mainly disposed in the open dumpsite at Without Treatment facility.
A Waste Treatment facility is being proposed along with Gadwal Municipality with rejects
transport to centralized landfill facility at Sheety Atmakur. Below is the area statement broadly
showing the area required against each component at the integrated treatment plant.
S. No Facility Area in Acres

1 Compost & RDF Plant 0.50
2 Other Supporting infrastructure, roads, Recyclables storage, Tanks etc. 0.25
3 Green belt 0.25
Total Area 1.00
The generated MSW in Ieeja town and the waste reaching to the processing facility may not be
same. It will depend on the efficiency of collecting the waste. However by implementing the
good MSW practices in Ieeja the efficiency of collecting MSW may also increases. As per the
records the total MSW generated in Ieeja city is around 10 TPD at present. The plant is designed
for the waste projected quantities in the year 2021 for 12.5 TPD with rejects transport to landfill
facility.
It is proposed composting for organic waste with dry waste RDF bailing along with recyclables
recovery process. The recyclable unit has been designed to process the recyclables into by
products. The inerts (rejects) would be disposed to the landfill whereas the organic material
(compostable in nature) would be sent to the compost plant and the light combustibles (RDF
fluff) would be utilized to produce energy.
Below is the material balance with process flow
Material Balance
Component Tonnage (TPD) Percentage (%)
Compost 2 17
RDF 3 25
Rejects to landfill 2.5 21
Moisture Loss 3.5 29
Recyclables – glass , plastic covers, metals etc. 0.25 2
Recyclables collected at DRCs in city 0.75 6

Total 12 100
Drain Silt 0.5 To landfill or fill low lying areas
Total 12.5
Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page ix

It is proposed to setup a Dry Waste Resource Collection Centers (DRCC) in the ULB to collect
recyclables from dry waste. It is proposed, all the dry waste collected shall be routed through
the DRCC.
VII. Planning and design of sanitary landfill
Processing rejects from treatment plant shall be transported to Sheety Atmakur regional landfill
facility. The table below shows the quantity of inerts going to landfill each year.
The quantity of inert material proposed for the landfill design for 25 years period is 0.85 lakh tones.
VIII. Project Costing
The cost estimates for integrated solid waste management system for Ieeja Municipality is
worked out based on the detailed study done by M/s. Feedback and its assessment of the MSW
management operations in Ieeja. The existing infrastructure available with the Municipality is
taken into account and costing for up-gradation of the system is worked out. The additional
investments thus required to increase the efficiency of the system and to meet the norms
prescribed by SWM Rules, 2016.
The Integrated Waste Management facility for the total Capital Cost is arrived for the project is
as below.
S. Item Description Amount in Rs Cost Sharing of

No. Lakhs ULB
1 MSW collection & Transportation 78.61 100%
2 MSW Treatment Plant (Compost & RDF) along with associated 269.95
civil structures & common Infrastructure 100%
3 Cost sharing of Landfill (Phase I) at Regional Landfill 68.48 28%
4 Price Adjustment @ 5% 20.85
5 Tender Premium @ 5% 20.85
6 Contingencies @ 2% 8.34
7 Information education & communication activities @ 0.5% 2.09
Total Project Cost 469.18
Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page x

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction to the Project
Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) refers to a systematic process that comprises waste
segregation and storage at source, primary collection, secondary storage, transportation, secondary
segregation, resource recovery, processing, treatment, and final disposal of solid waste. Municipal
Solid Waste management is important as it impacts health, environment and aesthetics of the
society, if not managed properly.
Municipal Solid Waste Management involves the application of principle of Integrated Solid Waste
management (ISWM) to municipal waste. ISWM is the application of suitable techniques,
technologies and management programs covering all types of solid wastes from all sources to
achieve the twin objectives of (a) waste reduction and (b) effective management of waste still
produced after waste reduction.
Rapid urbanization has led to over-stressing urban infrastructure services including Municipal Solid
Waste Management because of poor resources and inadequacies of the existing systems.
Augmentation of the Solid Waste Management facilities and their operation & maintenance in a
sustainable manner by urban local bodies would require proper systematic planning, capital
investment, introduction of latest technologies which are cost effective. This urbanization and
industrialization in Telangana have put pressure on Urban Local Bodies and Municipal Administration
to look at Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) efficiently.
1.2 Problem Associated with Solid Waste Management
As per the Constitution of India, Solid Waste Management is a state subject and it is the primary
responsibility of state governments to ensure that appropriate solid waste management practices
are introduced in all the cities and towns in the state. The role of Government of India is broadly to
formulate policy guidelines and provide technical assistance to the states/cities whenever needed. It
also assists the state governments and local bodies in human resource development and acts as an
intermediary in mobilizing external assistance for implementation of solid waste management
projects.
Though SWM is a State subject, it is basically a municipal function and as such urban local bodies are
directly responsible for performing this important activity. The 74th amendment of the constitution
also envisages the urban local bodies to shoulder this responsibility. The urban local bodies in the
country are, therefore, responsible and required to plan, design, operate, and maintain the solid
waste management system in their respective cities/towns.
Municipal Solid Waste Management and Handling Rules, 2016 also specifies solid waste
management as an obligatory function of urban local bodies but in actual practice the SWM is given
Page 8
the last priority and the duties are either not performed or poorly performed consequently the city
has to face numerable problems related to environment and sanitation.
The major deficiencies associated with the system are described in the following sections.
Rapidly Increasing Areas to be Served and Quantity of Waste

The Solid Waste quantities generated in urban centers are increasing due to rise in the population
and increase in the per capita waste generation rate. The increasing solid waste quantities and the
areas to be served strain the existing SWM system.
Inadequate Resources
While allocating resources SWM is on a lower priority resulting in allocation of inadequate funds and
also human resources due to the absence of trained staff.
Inappropriate Technology
The equipment and machinery presently used in the system are usually that which have been
developed for general purpose or that which have been adopted from other industry. This results in
underutilization of existing resources and lowering the efficiency.
Disproportionately High Cost of Manpower

Mostly out of the total expenditure, around 90% is accounted for manpower of which major portion
is utilized for collection. Due to lack of civic sense the road sides are waste laden & there is more
waste surrounding the bin then inside. This increases the work of the collection staff, thereby
directly affecting the collection costs.
Societal and Management Apathy

The operational efficiency of SWM depends on the active participation of both the municipal agency
and the citizens. Since the social status of SWM is low, there is a strong apathy towards it, which can
be seen from the uncollected waste in many areas and the deterioration of aesthetic and
environmental quality at the uncontrolled disposal sites.
Low Efficiency of the System

The SWM system is unplanned and is operated in an unscientific way. Neither the work norms are
specified nor the work of collection staff appropriately supervised. The vehicles are poorly
maintained and no schedule is observed for preventive maintenance. Due to shortage of financial
resources, the vehicles are often used beyond their life-period resulting in inefficient operation.
Further, there is no co-ordination of activities between different components of the system. The
cumulative effect of all these factors is an inefficient SWM system.
Urbanization
Urbanization is a global phenomenon, but its ramifications are more pronounced in developing
countries. High rate of population growth, declining opportunities in rural areas and shift from
stagnant and low paying agriculture sector to more paying urban occupations, largely contribute to
urbanization.
Page 9
Urbanization in conjunction with change in lifestyle contributes to higher waste generation, and
unscientific waste handling causes health hazards and urban environment degradation. Figure shows
past and projected Per capita waste generation in India. Solid Waste Management, in current
situation, is already a mammoth task in India and is going to be more complicated with the increase
in urbanization, changing lifestyles and increase in consumerism. Financial constraints, institutional
weaknesses, improper choice of technology and public apathy towards Municipal Solid Waste
(MSW) have made this situation worse.
The annual growth rate of urban population in India is 3.35% (Census of India, 2011). The proportion
of population living in urban areas has increased from 17.35% in 1951 to 31.2% in 2011 (Census,
2011). The total population of India, as per 2011 census, is 1210.1 million, of which 833.0 million is
rural population comprising about 68.8% and 337.1 million is urban population constituting to
31.16%. This rise in population has directly contributed to the increase in the per capita waste
generation of the country.
Source: Paper on “Urbanization and solid waste management in India: Present practices and future
challenges”, Dimpal Vij, International Conference on Emerging Economies – Prospects and Challenges
Figure 1-1: Past and projected Trend of Per capita Waste Generation
1.3 Status of Solid Waste Management
Considering average 450 gm/capita/day of solid waste and increase of 5% per year on account of
increase in the population and change in lifestyle of the people, it is it is assumed that urban India
will generate 2,76,342 TPD by 2021, 4,50,132 TPD by 2031 and 11,95,000 TPD by 2050. As per CPCB,
only 68% of the MSW generated in the country is collected of which, 28% is treated by the municipal
authorities. Only 19% of the total waste generated is currently treated. Following Figure 1 shows a
brief status of MSW management in India as on Feb 2015.
Page 10
Source: Action Plan on Management of Municipal Solid Waste by CPCB on 5th Feb 2015
Figure 1-2: Status of Solid Waste Management in Various Indian Cities
Status of Solid Waste Management in Telangana

Telangana was formed on 2nd June 2014 with the enactment of Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act
2014 with Hyderabad as its capital. The state comprises of 31 districts as per the district re-
organization undertaken in 2016. The Census 2011 reports urban population of Telangana state as
13.72 million representing about 38.89% of total population. Most of the net increase in the urban
population is contributed by five erstwhile districts of Hyderabad (100%), Rangareddy (70.32%),
Warangal (28.34%), Adilabad (27.68%) and Karimnagar (26.08%).
The urban population of the state spreads across 73 Urban Local Bodies consisting of 6 Corporations,
42 Municipalities and 25 Nagar panchayats and 1 Secunderabad Cantonment. The net increase of
urban population between 2001 and 2011 is about 38 lakhs people. Hyderabad is the 100%
urbanized district in the state being handled by Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC).
The total Municipal Solid Waste Generated in the 73ULBs of Telangana is 6628 tonnes per day
including the GHMC of which 4000 tonnes per day is collected and 3040 tonnes per day treated
while the remaining is disposed. Apart from GHMC, many of the ULBs do not have adequate
treatment and disposal facilities. Urban Local Bodies spend around Rs 1000 – 1500 per tonne per day
as payments from the municipal general funds. Out of this amount, 60 – 70% is spent on collection,
20 – 30% on transportation and less than 10% on processing and disposal activities.
Government of the erstwhile state has taken continuous concrete steps in improving the situation of
municipal solid waste management in the urban local bodies. The State government has spent the
twelfth finance commission grant of Rs. 374 crores exclusively for solid waste management which
Page 11
has to a large extent helped in improving the collection of waste, transportation machinery and in
acquiring land for processing and disposal facilities. The thirteenth finance commissions grant of Rs.
1919 crore has been allocated for solid waste management projects on public private partnership
basis in ULBs. The erstwhile state has been a forerunner in promotion of Waste to Energy in the
state. Nevertheless, the MA&UD department had grouped 122 ULBs excluding the GHMC into 19
clusters G.O. Rt. No. 1464 M.A, Dt: 24.10.2005 for developing WTE power projects on PPP mode. The
State has sanctioned and approved 10 clusters covering 66 ULBs. Government have approved 5 WTE
projects after the recommendations of the Technical Committee and State Level Official Committee
covering 32 ULBs in 5 clusters however, the WTE plants are yet to being there operations in full-
fledged manner.
Despite such initiatives there are major issues identified in the solid waste management sector.
Some are listed below: 1
 Lack of resources, systems and capacity for development and disposal of solid waste at ULB
level.
 Lack of support in financial, technical, and project development at state level to ULBs in
identifying right technologies, processes, structuring projects and implementation.
 Lack of awareness about the importance of effective solid waste management practices.
 Lack of capacities within the urban local bodies on processing technologies and scientific
landfills.
 Lack of substantial capital and O&M expense`s without matching revenues.
 Land acquisition is a major issue in SWM projects and a major cause of delay.
 Lack of technical expertise and institutional arrangements.
 Poor structuring of Waste to Energy projects on PPP mode
The Processing and Disposal Activities are still at nascent stage and to be improved a lot through
involvement of Community and private sector under PPP mode.
1.4 Present Context
The Govt. of India has launched the flagship program Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) to ensure
hygiene, waste management and sanitation across the nation as a tribute to Mahatma Gandhi on his
150th birth anniversary to be celebrated in the year 2019. SBM is being implemented by the Ministry
of Urban Development (MoUD) and by the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation (MoDWS) for
urban and rural areas respectively.
The main objective of SBM (Urban) is to bring about improvement in the cleanliness, hygiene and
the general quality of life in urban areas through modern and scientific waste management
methods. SBM (Urban) guidelines have suggested that the states shall prepare an Implementation
Framework with Action plans for solid waste management.
In this context, the Government of Telangana (GoTS) proposes to strengthen the Municipal Solid
Waste Management (MSWM) system covering collection, segregation, recycling, transportation
“MSW Management Strategy 2014, MA&UD, GoAP”

1
Page 12
processing and disposal including options for composting and waste to energy, disposal in all 72
Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) in Telangana (except GHMC) so as to comply with the service level
benchmarks of the Government of India.
The GoTS intends to institutionalize a holistic Integrated, sustainable environment and eco-friendly
MSWM System in the urban local bodies (ULBs) of the state in turn with SBM launched by GoI and
Swachh Telangana announced by Government of Telangana.
C&DMA is the Mission Director for the Swachh Telangana – Swachh Baharat Mission and proposes to
cause preparation of Detailed Project Reports for the 72 ULBs and also cluster-wise through the
TUFIDC. The 72 ULBs in the state are divided into 2 Regions (Hyderabad & Warangal) for
geographical convenience for conducting studies & preparation of DPRs. Separate DPRs are
prepared for each ULB including the existing practices of MSW management, inadequacies and
approaches for improvement of waste management within the policy, programmes & legal
framework.
1.5 Objectives
The main objective of the project is to propose a technical and economically viable solid waste
management plan along with the design of collection, transportation, treatment disposal
infrastructure with a financial overlay in line with MSWM rules 2016 and other applicable laws.
1.6 Scope of Work
To meet the proposed objective, a broad scope of work has been out lined in RFP as follows:
a. Realistic assessment of characterization of quantity, characterization and classification of
MSW, the current scenario in each ULBs.
b. Reconnaissance survey of the ULB to be conducted to assess the existing situation
c. Analyze the existing waste management situation with respect to segregation, collection,
transportation, processing and scientific disposal and Identification of key issues & bottlenecks
in the current system including the financial expenditure
d. Assess the institutional framework and resources available.
e. Detailed planning for resource requirements and implementation strategy.
f. Proposed DPR shall be in-line with MSWM rules, 2016 of GOI and the toolkit of the Govt. Of
India for SWM projects.
g. Scope of Work shall adhere to:
h. Keeping wet and dry waste stream separated at the household/ source level.
i. Doorstep collection, Segregation of wet waste.
j. Composting of biodegradable waste.
k. Recycling of dry waste by category.
l. Strategies for 100% source segregation and door to door collection of household and
commercial waste, street sweeping, silt removal, vegetable and fruit market waste, slaughter
house waste, etc., and suitable incentive structure to promote source segregation and
recycling.
Page 13
m. Identification of ideal site for setting up compost production and generation of green energy
through bio-mechanization in the proposed ULB/Cluster of ULBs as per feasibility.
n. Detailed transportation plan from the primary, secondary collection points to the proposed
processing or landfill plant with detailed process.
o. Analysis of the need for transfer station and its basic design features.
p. Tie-ups for inorganic waste and suggestions for suitable technologies for processing.
q. To prepare the preliminary design and preliminary working drawing, to suggest right type of
equipment/ machinery/building
r. Land requirement for the facility, including its optimization, break up for various purposes and
its availability
s. Details of each unit in the facility, with a brief describing of its operations describing the
process flow and design details (step-by-step procedure)
t. Opportunities for involvement of various groups of the society in MSWM activities.
u. Preparation of preliminary financial Model in order to explore the viability of a PPP model for
managing Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)
v. Options and strategies for processing of organic waste.
w. Techno-economic and environment analysis of various options for MSWM processes and
institutionalization.
x. Road map towards achieving zero landfill facility
y. Innovative incentive structure to the operating personnel for motivation and for ensuring
sustainability of MSWM
z. Exploring innovative processes and their enforcement for making the habitation litter free,
bins free and dump free so as to prevent health hazards.
aa. Creating and sustaining a supply chain for recycled waste (products & employments)
bb. Availability of land for proposed landfills.
cc. Implementation strategy including resource requirement.
dd. Information, Education and Communication (IEC) campaign models and enforcement plans.
ee. Streamlining and optimization of transportation system.
ff. Options for using the inert material like construction and demolition waste.
gg. Opportunities for reclamation and bio-mining of old dump site.
hh. Impact of the proposed MSWM system on community health and environment
ii. Proposed Measures for involvement of stakeholders in MSWM
jj. Measures for leadership development and change management
kk. The study should also consider existing projects being implemented on cluster basis in
consultation with the concerned Municipal Commissioners and C&DMA.
ll. Study the land availability for landfill in each ULB within the proposed cluster and the distance
to the centre of the clusters, and quantity rejects to be taken to the land fill.
mm. The DPR submitted should be practical and thoroughly implementable with zero landfilling and
with operation & maintenance strategies of MSWM.
nn. The DPR should propose a practical action plan for each ULB with cost implications and
financial requirements for each suggested methodology and consolidating for each cluster and
overall cost of implementation for the entire zone / state.
oo. The DPR should also suggest implementation strategies for the MSWM plans for
i. individual ULB’s which are not part of the clusters
ii. for the clusters of ULBs
Page 14
iii. For improvement in the clusters in which MSWM project is under implementation.
pp. The consultant should provide independent DPRs for each proposed cluster or ULB’s. Based on
the feasibility study, the numbers of clusters that can be formed in the region are to be
proposed. The DPR for the ULBs which the common processing unit is proposed for the cluster
should contain the complete details of the technology and cost estimation of the processing
unit.
qq. Based on the studies carried out a Detailed Project Report for efficient Municipal solid waste
management in the Municipality would be prepared. The Detailed Project Report (DPR) shall
suggest improvements to fulfill the requirements laid down in MSWM Rules 2016, notified by
the MOEF, Govt. of India.
1.7 Project Area
The ULBs in the state are divided into 2 Regions for

geographical convenience for conducting studies for
preparation of DPRs. C&DMA through TUFIDC has
invited proposals for preparation of Detailed Project
Reports (DPR) to enable the implementation of
Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) plan
(cluster-wise)/ULB wise, Hyderabad Region i.e., Zone -
I only which covers 41 ULBs of Telangana spread over
15 districts.
Table 1-1: List of ULBs – Project Area

S. No Districts Urban Local Bodies
1 Jogulamba (Gadwal) Gadwal, Ieeja
2 Kamareddy Kamareddy
3 Medak Medak
4 Mahabubnagar Mahabubnagar, Badepally, Narayanpet
5 Medchal (Malkajgiri) Medchal, Bod-Uppal, Peerzadiguda
6 Nagar Kurnool Nagar Kurnool, Kalvakurthi, Acchampet, Kollapur
7 Nalgonda Nalgonda, Miryalguda, Devarakonda
8 Nizamabad Nizamabad, Bodhan, Armoor
9 Ranga Reddy Shadnagar, Ibrahimpatnam, Pedda-Amberpet, Badangpet,
Jalpally, Meerpet, Jillelguda
10 Siddipet Siddipet, Dubbaka, Gajwel, Husnabad
11 Sangareddy Sangareddy, Zaheerabad, Andole-Jogipet, Sadasivpet
12 Suryapet Suryapet, Huzurnagar, Kodada
13 Vikarabad Vikarabad, Tandur
14 Wanaparthy Wanaparthy
15 Yadadri Bhongir
Page 15
The present DPR is on the Municipal Solid Waste Management for Ieeja Municipality in Jogumamba -
Gadwal district, Telangana. The plan is developed in consonance with the SWM Rules 2016, the state
policy & strategy on MSW Management and the Hon’ble NGT.
Page 16
CHAPTER 2. PROFILE OF IEEJA URBAN LOCAL BODY
2.1 Introduction
Ieeja was previously a region of the Raichur district under Karnataka which was ruled by Sri
Krishnadevaraya. Ieeja has a well, in which the water tastes of 7 types. Ieeja village was constructed
by Nalla Sobanadri, the king of Gadwal (Nalla Somanadri). The village was after the king’s mother
"BAKKAMAMBA."
2.2 Location
The town connects Kurnool in Andhra Pradesh with Raichur in Karnataka. The town was previously
under Mahabubnagar but after district re-organisation, it is included in Gadwal district.
2.3 Climate
The climate of the district is generally hot. As per climatic conditions of the district, the year may be
divided into four seasons. The hot season is from March to May. From March onwards it is a period
of continuous rise in the temperature and May is generally the hottest month of the year. The
South-west monsoons extend from June to September and the North-east monsoon follows up to
the end of December. The cold season is from December to February.
2.4 Physiography and Landform

Mahabubnagar district has typical physiographic characteristics of a plateau. It is higher in altitude in
the North and North-western parts showing a rugged topography with an elevation ranging between
300 and 600 meters. The district mainly belongs to the Archaean formation. A few areas in the
north-western and western part have Palaeozoic–upper pre-cambrian, lower pre-Cambrian,
Mesozoic-lower tertiary and undated formations. A smaller area in the South-east is noticed to show
the upper Precambrian formations. As regards the soils, Ustalfs group predominate all over the
district excepting for a smaller area along the South-western margin of the district, where Ustalfs
and Usterts groups are noticed.
2.5 Flora and Fauna

The district comprises two forest divisions viz., Mahabubnagar and Achampet. The forests in this
district are known to contain Thorny shrubs, Deciduous, Hardwickia binata type and bamboo type
etc. Wild life was fairly abundant in the inaccessible plateau regions of Amrabad and Farhabad, but,
much of the wild life has been reduced in recent decades. To protect the wild life; both Central and
State Governments have taken up projects under the scheme “Rajiv Gandhi wild life sanctuary” as a
Tiger reserve with an area of about 3,568 Sq Km spread across five districts namely Mahabubnagar,
Nalgonda, Guntur, Prakasam, and Kurnool. Mahabubnagar’s share of 1, 75,000 hectares is covered
under this sanctuary.
2.6 Planning Area

The extent of Ieeja ULB is about 8 Sq Km., which is divided into 20 election wards.
Page 17
2.7 Demographic profile

2.7.1 Population Growth Trends
The population of Ieeja was 18,382 persons during 1991, which has increased to 22, 708 persons
during 2001, which has further increased to 27,921 persons by 2011. The growth rate of population
during 1991-2001 was 23.53 percent and during 2001-2011 is about 22.96 percent. The population
of the town has increased by 1.5 times in 2 decades. It is observed that the population growth rate
during the last two decades is stable. The details of population growth are provided in Table 2.1.
Table 2-1: Population Growth Trends in Ieeja

Year Population Increase Growth Rate (%)
1991 18382
2001 22708 4326 23.53
2011 27921 5213 22.96
Average 4769.5 23.24
Source: Census of India - 1991, 2001 & 2011
2.7.2 Sex Ratio

The sex ratio of Ieeja NP was 975 during 1991. It has decreased to 966 during 2001, which has
increased to 981 during 2011. The details of sex ratio are provided in Table 2.2.
Table 2-2: Details of Sex Ratio in Ieeja

Year Total Population Male Population Female Population Sex Ratio
1991 18382 9306 9076 975
2001 22708 11547 11161 966
2011 27921 14091 13830 981
2.7.3 Literacy Rate

The literacy rate of Ieeja was 24.76 % during 1991, it has increased to 36.31 % during 2001, which
has further increased to 47.13 % during 2011. The literacy rate of the town is relatively low when
compared with other urban areas in the district.
2.7.4 Workforce Participation

During 2001, the overall work participation rate in N.P. is 48.7 percent. The share of main work
workers is 43.0 per cent, while the share of marginal workers is 5.7 percent. The overall work
participation rate during 2011 was 49.0 per cent. The share main workers is 47.3 per cent and
marginal workers is 1.7 per cent. It is observed that the overall work participation rate has increased
by a negligible percentage of 0.3 during 2001 - 2011.
Table 2-3: Work Participation in Ieeja

Year 2001 2011
Main Workers (%) 43.0 47.3
Marginal Workers (%) 5.7 1.7
Work Participation Rate (WPR) 48.7 49.0
Page 18
2.7.5 Average Household Size

The total number of households in Ieeja Nagar Panchayat was 4111 numbers during 2001, which has
increased to 5614 numbers by 2011. During 2001-2011, the total population of the town has
increased with a growth rate of 23.0 per cent, while the households increased with a growth rate of
36.6 per cent. It can be observed that the growth rate of households is much higher than the growth
rate of population. The average household size has decreased from 5.5 persons to 5.0 persons
during this period. The details are provided in Table 2.4.
Table 2-4: Growth of Housing in Ieeja Town

Particulars 2001 2011
Population 22708 27921
Number of Households 4111 5614
Growth Rate of Population - 23.0%
Growth Rate of Households - 36.6%
Average Household Size 5.5 5.0
2.8 Trade and Commerce
The total no of Commercial Establishments in the ULB are 788. Out of these the highest share of
establishment is commercial retails with 88.96 per cent
followed by Hospitals with 4.82 per cent, Non veg markets
with 3.55 per cent, and Hotels with 2.54 per cent. The
lowest share of commercial establishment is vegetable
market with 0.13 per cent. The details of the commercial
establishment in Ieeja NP are provided in Annexure 2. A
detailed analysis to understand the extent of solid waste
generated by these establishments is provided in Chapter 3.
2.9 Physical Planning and Growth Aspects
2.9.1 Spatial Growth Trends

A major part of Ieeja is spread along Gadwal-Ieeja main road. The tributary of Tungabhadra River
passes thought the central part of the development, cutting the overall development into two
halves. The initial development took place along the north-eastern direction of the tributary. In the
later stages, the development has spread over the western side of Gadwal-Ieeja Road and southern
part of the tributary.
2.9.2 Future development areas

Developed areas on the north-eastern part of the panchayat are surrounded by streams which act as
the natural barriers for future development. Areas located along Gadwal-Ieeja, Raichur-Kurnool road
and Ieeja-Madikonda Road may attract the future developments. Potential Development areas are
indicated in the Map.
Page 19
Map: Spatial development patterns and future growth areas
2.9.3 Land use Analysis

Presently the master plan for Ieeja Nagar
Panchayat is not available. An attempt is
made to understand the existing land use
patterns in the Nagar Panchayat based on
URDPFI Guidelines.
The total extent of town area is 800 Ha. As
per the estimates, about 279.2 Ha is
developed and remaining 520.8 Ha is
Vacant. Further the share of land under
residential use is about 47 percent, followed
by Recreation by 13 percent, transport &
communication with 11 per cent and
Industrial areas with 9 per cent. The land
under commercial use is the lowest with 3 per cent and followed by public & semi-public activities
which is about 7 per cent. The remaining extent of land could be a combination of agricultural use,
water bodies and special areas. Though the estimated extent of land under recreation is about 13
percent and traffic and transportation is 11 percent, these values will be lower than the estimations
Page 20
in small and medium sized towns. The estimated landuse classification details are provided in
Annexure 3.
2.9.4 Slum Population

The total number of slums in Ieeja is 20. Out of these 12 slums are notified and remaining are Non-
notified.
2.9.5 Road networks & Drainage

The total length of roads in Ieeja town is 20 km. The total length of drainage in Ieeja town is 16 km.
2.9.6 Heritage & tourism

There are no prominent heritage and tourism spots within the town or vicinity.
2.9.7 Population Projections

Population projections are made by using three methods namely arithmetic increase method,
incremental increase method and geometric increase method. The projected population figures
under each method are indicated in Table 2.5. To factor in any possible population growth
accelerators in future, an average of population sizes forecasted from these methods is used for the
study.
Table 2-5: Population Projections

Forecast Type 2016 2021 2031 2041
Arithmetic Increase Method 30306 32691 37461 42231
Geometrical Increase Method 30997 34411 42409 52266
Incremental Increase Method 30638 33578 40121 47552
Note: Computed based on data available with Census of India - 1991, 2001 & 2011
Page 21
CHAPTER 3. ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING SOLID WASTE

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
3.1 Introduction
The main objectives of the Solid Waste Management are to improve the collection efficiency and
reduce the quantity of solid waste disposed off on land by recovery of materials, by producing
manure & energy from solid waste.
In this section review and analysis of the data collected on the present solid waste management
practices of the project area are discussed. A detailed field survey has been conducted to assess the
quality and quantity of the solid waste generated and discussed in the next chapters. In addition,
detailed discussions with the concerned officials & resource persons have also been carried out.
The brief activities of SWM system is as follows

1. Primary collection system –
 Primary storage of waste at generator level
 Segregation
 Door to door collection of waste from generators
2. Secondary storage at community level
3. Street Sweeping and Drain Cleaning
4. Transportation of waste
5. Treatment and disposal of waste
Ieeja Municipality has been studied for its existing system and identified gaps and presented below.
3.2 Sources of Municipal Solid Waste
There are different sources in Municipality which are contributing to the municipal solid waste.
These sources include;
Table 3-1: Source of Waste generators
S. No Type of Waste Generators Number
1 Households 6650
2 Shops/Malls/Complexes 750
3 Hotels 11
4 Markets major 1
5 Hospital/Clinic 6
6 Schools 53
7 Road Length 20km
8 Drain Length 16km
Page 22
3.3 Collection and Transportation system
3.1.1 Primary Collection System
Primary waste collection is the important essential step of solid waste management activity. Primary
collection system is necessary to ensure that the waste stored at source is collected regularly and it
is not disposed of on the streets, drains, water bodies, etc.
The collection of solid waste from the door to door households, shops, and establishments is called
primary collection.
a) Door to Door Collection from households:

Individual houses
The collection is done by the sanitary labours. 7 tricycles
are used for collection. There is no segregation of waste at
source into dry and wet waste at household level. This
waste is directly taken to the dumping yard or nearest
open place without segregation.
Slums
The waste is cleared once in a week in the slum areas. The
slum dwellers are directly dumping their waste into vacate
lands. The waste is scooped from the drains and piled at the sides for draining the water. As such the
lanes are very narrow. This adds to the congestion and piling creates nuisance which is intolerable.
b) Street sweepings & collection
The sweepers are allotted certain stretches of the roads.
Internal street sweeping is done once in a week in the
Nagarpanchayat. Main roads are swept twice in a week. Both
internal streets and main roads are swept in the morning
from 6am to 7am. The collected waste is transported to the
nearest dust or open place by using tricycles.
c) Shops/Office/Institutions
The shopkeepers usually do not allow placing bin near their shop
for aesthetic reasons. But, they expect the waste to be cleared.
Hence the waste finds its way into streets and drains, which is
cleared through street sweepings.
d) Hotels & Restaurants
The waste generated from the hotels is collected by the tractor with 4 sanitary workers in the
morning hours of the.
e) Markets
Page 23
Waste generated in the markets is collected by the tricycles on daily basis and transported to dump
yard using tractors.
f) Hospitals/Nursing homes
In the case of Hospitals, non-biomedical waste is collected during commercial shops waste collection
in the morning hours.
3.1.2 Secondary Collection Scenario
There are no secondary collection points/bins in the town. Waste collected from households &
commercial areas is directly transported to the dumping site by tricycles.
3.1.3 Transportation
Transportation is the third step of solid waste management involves movement of vehicles to collect
the waste from primary collection points to the dumpsite. After collecting the waste from different
areas and from different sources they transport the waste to the dumping site. At present, waste is
being collected in tricycles from HH, markets, roads and commercial areas is transporting directly
and disposed on road side at BC Colony. Details of vehicles used for the transportation of waste are
listed in the Table 3.2.
Table 3-2: Inventory of vehicles

S. No Vehicle Type No of Vehicles Owner ship No of Trips
1 Tricycles 7 Own 2
Daily 2 trips are made by Rickshaws. The total waste transported to the dumping yard is 4.2 MT per
day
3.1.4 Disposal of Solid Waste
At present there is no designated dumpsite for the municipality. Waste being collected is dumped on
road side at BC colony.
Page 24
3.4 Institutional Profile

Sanitary staff
There are 9 tricycles available with municipality, out of which 2 are under repair. 7 tricycles
operators, 18 sweepers, who also involves in drain cleaning available.
3.5 Deficiency Analysis

To design and develop successful plan for Solid waste management system at any given town, it is
essential to study the existing system, identification of gaps and analyze the system for its
deficiencies.
The below table shows the deficiency analysis in the existing MSW management system.
Table 3-3: Deficiency Analysis

Component Indicator Existing system Remarks
Regulatory MSW Rules 2016 and Existing system in not
Compliance Service level Bench mark completely in line
with MSW rules 2016
and partial
compliance of Service
Level Bench Mark
Door to door Arrange for door to door Door to door Collection need to be
collection collection of segregated collection of waste is daily and increase
solid waste from all not covering all the efficiency of vehicles
households including generators.
slums and informal
settlements, commercial,
Institutional and other
non-residential premises.
Segregation at source Segregation of waste at Segregation is absent Need to arrange
source by storing of waste awareness workshops
in 3 different bins wet, dry
and domestic hazardous
waste.
Secondary Collection There are no Littering in vacant
secondary collection spaces need to be
points addressed.
Street Sweeping Organize Street sweeping Street sweeping Suitable Tools and
covering all the residential activity is 100% equipment need to be
and commercial areas on provided. Also some
all the days of the year community bins for
irrespective of Sundays storage of waste
and public holidays. instead of road side
heaps.
Page 25
Component Indicator Existing system Remarks

Transportation Waste transportation Existing system is not
is by tricycles established properly
due to poor
infrastructure.
Community Community
participation participation is not
established
Public Awareness Municipality is Awareness by
initiating and organizing meetings
planning for IEC with people.
activities.
Waste Treatment Establishment of waste No treatment plant Suitable treatment
Plant processing facility for at present. Waste is plant to be established
organic waste and dumping on road
recycling centers sides.
Waste Disposal No scientific landfill It is proposed to
at present establish scientific
landfill for inerts
Page 26
Service Level Analysis with SLB

SLB
S. Value
Indicator Rationale Formula and calculation Standard Gap
No. (%)
(%)
1 Household Door-step level ( Total number

level collection is an of households
coverage of essential and and
Formula
SWM critical starting establishments
services point in the entire with daily
through chain of scientific doorstep
door-to- solid waste collection/ Total
door management number of
collection services. Having households and
of waste waste free clean establishments
roads and drains, in the service Service
scientific area ) X 100 level is only
treatment of 31% which
waste so as to can be
maximise increased
31 100
treatment, by
recycling, and deploying
disposal, can all be Sufficient
achieved in a no.of
sustainable vehicles
calculation
manner only if
2100/6650*100
door-to-door
collection of waste
is sustained. The
indicator
measures the
coverage of door-
to-door solid
waste collection
services
2 Collection Collection ( Total quantum
Efficiency efficiency should of waste that is
measure waste collected by the
collected in ULB or Gap of 60%
Formula
normal course by authorized due to less

40 100%
the SWM systems. service collection
Typically the providers/Total efficiency.
uncollected waste waste that is
tends to gradually generated and
find its way into which needs
Page 27
SLB
S. Value
No. (%)
(%)
recycling, or is to be collected)
strewn along the X 100
roads, clogs the
drains or in case of
bio-degradable
waste, it putrefies
Calculation
and degrades.
Therefore, 4.2/10.55*100
collection
efficiency is a key
performance
indicator.
3 Extent of Segregation of 0 100 segregation

Segregation waste is a critical is absent
of waste requirement for (Quantum of
sustainable solid waste that is
waste segregated/Total
management quantum of
Formula
systems. waste that is

Segregations collected by the
enables recycling, ULB or
reuse, treatment authorized
and scientific service
disposal of the providers) X 100
different
components of
Page 28
SLB
S. Value
No. (%)
(%)
waste. Segregation
of waste should
ideally be at
source, and should
then also be
transported in a
segregated
manner up to the
point of treatment
and /or disposal. If
waste is received
at these points in a
segregated
Calculation
manner, it can be
0/4.1X100
safely assumed,
that it has been
segregated at
source and
transported so;
while the converse
may not be true.
Therefore,
segregation is
being measured at
this point of
receipt, rather
than at point of
collection.
4 Extent of The processing, ( Amount of 0 80 No

recovery of recycling and waste that is treatment
waste reuse should be processed or plant is
collected carried out recycled / Total available to
without creating quantum of recover
Formula
any health and waste that is resources

environmental collected by the from the
hazards, the total ULB or waste
quantum of waste authorized
recovered is in service
itself a key providers) X 100
Page 29
SLB
S. Value
No. (%)
(%)
performance
parameter.
Therefore,
measurement of
this indicator is
critical. The
benchmark value
for this indicator
will depend on the
Calculation
amount of inert
0/4.1*100
matter comprised
in the waste
collected by the
ULB. Waste
composition is
typically unique
for each city, while
being in a broad
range of values for
similar cities.
5 Extent of Inert waste should ( Total waste 0 100 No

scientific finally be disposed disposed in scientific
disposal of at landfill sites, "compliant" landfill at
waste in which are landfills every present
Formula
landfill sites designed, built, month / Total

operated and waste disposed
maintained as in all landfills
standards laid every month) X
down in prevailing 100
laws and manuals
of nodal agencies.
This includes
collection and
treatment of
Calculation
leacheate at the 0/0*100

landfill site. Extent
of compliance
should be seen
against total
quantum of Waste
that is disposed in
Page 30
SLB
S. Value
No. (%)
(%)
landfills. This is a
critical
performance
parameter from
an environmental
sustainability
perspective.
6 Extent of The costs related (Total annual 0 100

Cost to SWM may Be Formula operating
Recovery recovered through revenues / Total
for the ULB a combination of annual operating
in SWM taxes and user expenses) X 100
services charges. In case of
SWM, there is
potential to
supplement user
charges with
revenues that can
be gained from
Calculation
recycling, reuse
and conversion of 0/0*100
waste to either
compost or fuel or
directly to energy.
Therefore, it is
critical for
measuring overall
cost recovery.
7 Efficiency Many ULBs / (Total number of 0 80 Not

in redressal utilities have put complaints available
of in place systems to redressed within
customer capture the month /
Formula
complaints complaints, much Total number of

more work needs SWM related
to be done to put complaints
in place back-end received per
systems for month) X 100
Page 31
SLB
S. Value
No. (%)
(%)
satisfactorily
resolving those
complaints in a
timely manner. As
SWM is an
Not available
essential service,
Calculation
the benchmark
time for redressal
is 24 hours or the
next working day.
It is therefore
important to
monitor this
indicator.
8 it is not just (Current 0 90 No user

enough to have an revenues charges
appropriate tariff collected in the collection
Formula
structure that given year /

enables cost Total operating
recovery revenues billed
objectives, but during the given
also efficient year) X 100
collection of
Efficiency revenues that are
in Due to the utility.
collection It is also important
of SWM that the revenues
charges are collected in
the same financial
Calculation
year, without 0/0*100

allowing for dues
to get
accumulated as
arrears. It is
Therefore critical
to monitor this
indicator.
Page 32
Table 3-4: Timelines for Implementation

Time limit
Implementati
from the date
S. No. Activity Status on time for
of notification
ULB
of rules
1 Identification of suitable sites for setting 1 year Land is not Immediate
up solid waste processing facilities available
2 Identification of suitable sites for setting 1 year Land is not NA
up common regional sanitary landfill available
facilities for suitable clusters of local
authorities under 0.5 million population
and for setting up common regional
sanitary landfill facilities or standalone
sanitary landfill facilities by all local
authorities having a population of 0.5
million or more .
3 Procurement of suitable sites for setting 2 years Land is not I year
up solid waste processing facility and available
sanitary landfill facilities
4. Enforcing waste generators to practice 2 years No 1 year
segregation of bio degradable, recyclable, segregation
combustible, sanitary waste domestic
hazardous and inert solid wastes at source
5. Ensure door to door collection of 2 years Under 100% in 1 year
segregated waste and its transportation in Progress
covered vehicles to processing or disposal
facilities.
6. Ensure separate storage, collection and 2 years Not in 1 year
transportation of construction and practice
demolition wastes
7. Setting up solid waste processing facilities 2 years No treatment 2 years
by all local bodies having 100000 or more plant at
population present
8. Setting up solid waste processing facilities 3 years NA
by local bodies and census towns below
100000 population.
9. Setting up common or standalone 3 years NA
sanitary landfills by or for all local bodies
having 0.5 million or more population for
the disposal of only such residual wastes
from the processing facilities as well as
untreatable inert wastes as permitted
under the Rules
10. Setting up common or regional sanitary 3years No Scientific 2 years
Page 33
Time limit
Implementati
from the date
S. No. Activity Status on time for
of notification
ULB
of rules
landfills by all local bodies and census landfill
towns under 0.5 million population for the
disposal of permitted waste under the
rules
11. bio-remediation or capping of old and 5 years 4 Years
abandoned dump sites
Page 34
CHAPTER 4. WASTE QUANTIFICATION & CHARACTERIZATION
4.1 Introduction
Quantification of municipal waste generated was carried out for different sources of generation such
as residential, commercial, institutional, street sweeping and drain cleaning, markets, slaughter
houses, function halls, cinema halls, etc. Waste composition, characteristics and quantities of solid
waste is essential as:
 It provides the basic data on which the management system is planned, designed and
operated.
 The changes/trend in composition and quantity of waste over a period of time are known
which help in future planning.
 It provides the information for selection of equipment and appropriate technology.
 It indicates the amount and type of material suitable for processing, recovery and recycling.
 The forecast trends assist designers and manufacturers in the production of vehicles and
equipment suitable for the future needs.
 The waste generation rates have been worked out on the basis of field surveys, waste
sampling and discussion with the different waste generators and the officials of the
Municipality. The results of the study are set out in this section.
4.2 Quantification of Waste

Waste generation is strongly dependent on the local economy, lifestyle, and infrastructure. Different
collection of municipal solid waste samples location points (generation/collection) covering a larger
size of population are identified. Based on the type of area such as residential, commercial,
Industrial, market, slum etc. Sampling points are distributed uniformly all over the study area. The
sampling points are further classified based on economic status of population such as high, middle
and low income group.
4.1.1 MSW Survey

The quantity of waste generation is estimated and considered by using Secondary sources and
Primary survey results
4.1.2 Residential
Primary surveys were conducted in Ieeja town to understand the waste generation characteristics at
household level. The surveys covered different income groups namely HIG, MIG, LIG and EWS
households. Areas to be covered in the survey were broadly identified based on reconnaissance
survey. The areas to conduct sample collection were finalized in consultation with ULB staff. During
the survey, domestic waste samples were collected from 200 households from the selected areas.
Page 35
Table 4-1: Quantification Survey Details of Household

Select Group Weight (Kg) Volume (Lts) HHs Disposed Waste today
HIG 50 60 50
MIG 46 60 50
LIG 40.5 60 50
EWS 50 60 50
Based on the average generation of municipal solid waste, it can be estimated the waste generation
for the domestic households as shown in Table 4.2
Table 4-2: Total Garbage Generation for Households

Description Qty/No UoM
Waste Generated / Household 0.932 kgs/household
Household as per ULB 6650 Number
Waste Generated 6.2 MT /Day
Per Capita Waste Generation 200.0 gms/capita/day
Source: Field Survey by Feedback Infra team
4.1.3 Commercial
The waste from the commercial establishments like shops and offices, wholesale and retail stores,
markets, hotels, schools, temples and hospital etc., have been considered in this category. In order
to assess the waste generated by these establishments, field visits and field assessment surveys were
carried out in the major commercial areas. Discussions were also held, with the shop owners on the
amount of waste generated by each of them and disposal practices. Details of waste quantification
are provided in Table 4.3
A. Shops/Office/Institutions
The wastes generated from shops, offices & institutions are dry and mostly recyclable. These wastes
are stored in plastic bins, plastic covers or thrown onto the streets. As per trade licences, total
number of shops in the Nagarpanchayat is 697. About 2.39 MT of waste is generated per day.
B. Hotels & Restaurants

In total there are 20 hotels, messes and restaurants are located in the Nagarpanchayat. These
establishments generate about 0.46 MT of waste per day. The wastes generated from these places
are food waste and mixed in nature. The wastes are stored in containers or metal tins.
C. Markets
The markets are classified into vegetable and non-vegetable markets. In Ieeja Nagarpanchayat there
are 1 major vegetable and 28 Non-vegetable Shops. These establishments generate total of 0.60 MT
of waste per day.
D. Hospitals/Nursing Homes
The hospital waste comprises of biomedical waste and Non-bio medical waste. Bio medical waste is
stored and collected by an external agency which handles biomedical waste. Non-bio medical waste
Page 36
generated is collected by the sanitary staff. Presently, about 38 hospitals/clinics are presenting
different parts of the Nagarpanchayat. This generate a waste of 0.45 MT of waste per day.
Table 4-3: Total Garbage generation for Commercial Establishments

S. No Type of Waste Total waste generation in tonnes
1 Shops/Malls/Complexes 2.39
2 Markets 0.60
3 Hospital 0.45
4 Hotels 0.46
Total 3.9
4.1.4 Street Sweeping

The total road length in Ieeja Nagarpanchayat is about 20.00 Km. Out of this, 3.2 Km is classified as
main roads, 12.8 km is internal street roads and 4 Km as peripheral areas. The total quantity of
waste generated from the street sweeping is about 0.17 MT per day. The details of the Street
sweeping lengths and frequency are provided in Table 4.4
Table 4-4: Waste generation from Road sweeping

Frequency of % to Total Waste
Sweeping length Waste generated per day
sweeping Generated
Daily 5 0.11 64.71
Alternative day 2 0.03 17.65
Once in 3 days 3 0.03 17.65
Total 10 0.17 100
Source: Ieeja ULB
Note: * Based on the GIS data from CDMA
4.1.5 Drain Silt and other waste

Total length of drains is about 16 km, which is 16 km of drains are cleaned weekly once. The total
quantity of waste generated from the drain cleaning is about 0.28 MT per day. The details of the
drain cleaning are provided in Table 4-5.
Table 4-5: Details of drain cleaning
Drain cleaning Frequency of Silt Generated per % to Total Waste
Drain length (Km)
length (Km) Cleaning day (MT) Generated
16 16 Weakly Once 0.28 100
4.3 Summary of Waste Generation

The average daily waste generation estimated in Municipality is around 10.55 tons. At this rate the
gross per capita generation of solid waste work outs to 340.4gm/capita/day. Table 4.5 below gives
the breakdown of waste generation from various sources.
Page 37
Table 4-5: Total Waste Generated

S. No Type of waste Waste Generation per ton Percentage
1 Domestic source waste generated (in tons) 6.20 59
2 Shops/Malls/Complexes 2.39 23
3 Markets 0.60 6
4 Hospital 0.45 4
5 Hotels 0.46 4
6 Street Sweeping 0.17 2
7 Drain Silt 0.28 3
Total Waste Generated Per Day (in tons) 10.55 100
4.4 Collection Efficiency of Ieeja
Daily 3 trips are made by tricycles. The total waste transported to the dumping yard is 4.2 MT per
day, which is translated to 42% of the collection efficiency.
4.5 Future Generation Trends
Based on geometric progression projections and the per capita survey results the waste
quantification calculations were carried for the year 2045. The below table gives the quantification
details, increase of per capita and waste generation details.
Table 4-6: Waste Projections
S. No. Year Population by Waste Generation Rate Total Waste for One day
Geometric method (Kg/c/day). (in M.T.)
1 2016 30997 0.340 10.55
2 2017 31651 0.345 10.91
3 2018 32320 0.349 11.29
4 2019 33002 0.354 11.68
5 2020 33699 0.358 12.08
6 2021 34411 0.363 12.49
7 2022 35138 0.368 12.92
8 2023 35880 0.373 13.37
9 2024 36637 0.377 13.83
10 2025 37411 0.382 14.30
11 2026 38201 0.387 14.79
12 2027 39008 0.392 15.30
13 2028 39832 0.397 15.83
14 2029 40673 0.403 16.37
15 2030 41532 0.408 16.94
16 2031 42409 0.413 17.52
Page 38
S. No. Year Population by Waste Generation Rate Total Waste for One day
Geometric method (Kg/c/day). (in M.T.)
17 2032 43305 0.418 18.12
18 2033 44219 0.424 18.75
19 2034 45153 0.429 19.39
20 2035 46107 0.435 20.06
21 2036 47080 0.441 20.75
22 2037 48075 0.446 21.46
23 2038 49090 0.452 22.20
24 2039 50127 0.458 22.96
25 2040 51185 0.464 23.75
26 2041 52266 0.470 24.57
27 2042 53370 0.476 25.41
28 2043 54497 0.482 26.29
29 2044 55648 0.489 27.19
30 2045 56824 0.495 28.13
4.6 Waste Characterization and Physical Composition of Waste
About 10 kg of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is collected from 10 locations from outside and inside
of the solid waste heap of mixed waste. The total quantity of waste so collected is thoroughly mixed
and then reduced by method of quartering till a sample of such a size is obtained which can be
handled personally. The sample so obtained is subjected to physical analysis.
The Physical Characteristics like moisture content, density, percentage of different components,
such as, paper, plastic, glass, metal, organic matter, sand, soil, bricks, stones etc were calculated.
The Chemical Characteristics like pH, percentage of Nitrogen, Potassium and phosphorus, total
carbon and C/N ratio were analyzed and represented in the report. Calorific value of the municipal
solid waste (in Kcal), Toxic characteristics were also analyzed and given in the report.
The physical composition of municipal solid waste is normally presented as Organic, Recyclables,
combustible and Inert matter. Waste samples were collected and analyzed for these three
parameters and data is presented in the below table.
Table 4-7: Physical Composition of Waste

Item Item wise Generation %
ORGANIC WASTE 51
RECYCLABLES 17
COMBUSTIBLE 17
INERT MATTER 15
TOTAL 100
Source: On site physical characterization study by Feed back
Page 39
Chemical Characterization of waste

Chemical characteristics considered for municipal waste are mainly, moisture, nitrogen,
phosphorous, potassium, C/N ratio etc. MSW sample was collected from the dump yard and
analyzed for various chemical characteristics. The results are shown in the below table.
Table 4-8: Chemical composition of Waste

No. Parameters UOM Results
1 Moisture Content % 24.8
2 Volatile solids % 46.9
3 pH -- 8.46
4 EC dS/m 1362
5 Total Organic C % dm 19.5
6 Total N % dm 0.8
7 Total P % dm 0.8
8 Total K % dm 0.86
9 C:N Ratio -- 22:1
10 GCV K.cal/kg 1628
11 Bulk Density gm/cc 0.46
12 Ash Content % 46.1
2+
13 Zinc as Zn mg/kg 410
14 Copper as Cu2+ mg/kg 148
2+
15 Cadmium as Cd mg/kg 3.8
2+
16 Lead as Pb mg/kg 48.3
+
17 Nickel as Ni mg/kg 9.4
3+
18 Chromium as Cr mg/kg 34.2
Source: Pragathi Labs, Hyderabad
Page 40
CHAPTER 5. PLANNING FOR INTEGRATED MUNICIPAL SOLID

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN THE ULB
5.1 Introduction
The Municipal Solid Waste Management Plan cannot be developed in Isolation and is essentially a
municipal function. This is mandatory for all municipal authorities to manage the waste in an
environmentally acceptable manner. It has to consider the objectives of other planning processes in
force in the ULB. An integration of the objectives of the master plan and the city development plan
shall be considered after assessing the requirement of tools, equipment, vehicles and processing and
disposal facilities, meeting the long term goals of the ULB’s. Most importantly this plan has to be
sustainable both financially & technically. This plan has to be linked to the City Sanitation Plan and
National Urban Sanitation Plan, if required and should be in tune with the SWM Rules 2016.
The MSWM plan is prepared depending on the existing plan for the ULB and the size of the area. This
plan is prepared for a tenure, based on the population projection for the ULB and should be
reviewed periodically.
The factors which are considered in preparation of the MSWM plan

1. Future population or population projection
2. Per capita waste generated based on field survey & waste projections, as per CPHEEO
manual
3. Characterization of the waste based on analysis
4. Applicable laws, rules and regulations for MSW
5. Institutional & financial structuring of the ULB’s
6. Community participation & development
7. Collection & transportation technologies
8. Land availability
9. Suitable technology for MSW processing based on ISWM hierarchy
5.2 Future Population or Population Projections

Estimating future waste generation quantities and composition is critical for developing MSWM
plan. Planning horizons for MSW processing, treatment, or disposal projects typically extend to 20–
30 years, depending on the nature of the facility. Forecasting future MSW generation is dependent
on various factors, such as:
a. Future Population forecasts

b. Anticipated lifestyle changes and
c. Change in socio economic & political profile of the ULB
The population projections considered in the CPHEEO Manual have been made after studying the
population growth trend from 1981 onwards. This has been an important step in order to bridge the
gap between demand & supply demand and also to estimate the future requirement of the ULB.
Page 41
The following methods have been used to project the future population of the town based on the
past year population such as:
a) Arithmetic Increase Method

b) Geometric Increase Method
c) Incremental Increase Method
Method 2016 2021 2031 2041

Arithmetic Method 30306 32691 37461 42231
Geometric Method 30997 34411 42409 52266
Incremental Increase Method 30638 33578 40121 47552
For a town like Ieeja, the Geometric Increase Method is adopted wherein a decadal average is
considered as the growth rate.
5.3 Per Capita Waste Generation & Projection
The present waste generation based on the local economy, lifestyle and infrastructure was assessed
with field survey. It’s generally established that the waste generation is proposal to the average
income of the people living there. The waste generated in Ieeja is as below:
Waste quantity / Per capita with 1.3%

Year Population Waste Quantity / Year
day increase as per CPHEEO
2016 30997 10.55 3,851 0.340
2021 34411 12.49 4,560 0.363
2031 42409 17.52 6,395 0.413
2041 52266 24.57 8,968 0.470
5.4 Municipal Solid Waste Management Plan (MSWMP):
MSW management plan for the ULB comprises of different components as below based on the
population and the waste generation. This is as per the CPHEEO manual of MoUD.
• Collection and Transportation
• Treatment plant for processing of waste and resource recovery facility
• Safe disposal by means of sanitary landfill
Population Waste Primary doorsteps Secondary Decentralized/ Bulk

Tones segregated collection place, Centralized transportation,
/ day collection equipment and processing, landfill
equipment and vehicles recovery & disposal
Vehicles recycling
50,000 to 10-30 80% door-to-door 100% street 50%decentralized Inert street
1,00,000 TPD collection through sweeping waste processing of sweeping, silt
covered LCV to be collected waste if suitable from the
Page 42
in containerized space is available drains, and

20% door-to-door handcarts and residual waste
collection through deposited in 3- If no space, from
containerized 4m3 containers domestic and processing
tricycles or trade waste to be plants to be
handcarts from Containers to be processed at landfilled
narrow lanes placed at 4 per centralized
km2 area or 1 facility with
Direct per 5,000 resource
transportation of populations. recovery.
waste to
processing facility Containers to be
if distance is lifted by
under 5km, or tractors/ twin
transportation bin dumper
through placers
compactors if
distance of
processing facility
is longer
In view of the above table proposed Integrated MSW management plan for the ULB is as follows
Based on the waste characterization and quantification in this ULB, the following combination of
waste processing technologies are proposed
• Windrow Composting / Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) / Biomethanization for market waste
Page 43
For the C&T and Processing & Disposal design periods (timeframe) i.e short term & long term are
considered.
i. Short term plan (5 years) : These plans comprise of action plan and
implantation schedule and generally lead to a long term plan. These plans should be
reviewed every 2-3 years to ensure higher success of implementation plan. Generally
collection & transportation plan is a short term plan.
ii. Long term plan (20-25 years) : Is a cluster of 4-5 short term plans, with specific
planning cycles. The financial outlay for each cycle should be elaborated along with the
source of funds. Processing and disposal is a long term plan.
iii. Midterm review of these plans between 2nd and 3rd year
5.5 CLUSTER FOR JOGIMAMBA-GADWAL DISTRICT
A regional Landfill facility at Gadwal is proposed for processing rejects from Gadwal and Ieeja.
The concept of Regional / Cluster–based approach is to discourage setting up of individual waste

processing or disposal facilities as far as possible. If individual urban local body set up their facilities,
it will result in mushrooming of many / innumerable facilities within the zone which may be difficult
to monitor. However, a bigger city / district may set up its own facility to avoid long distance
transportation of garbage.
Here both the facilities i.e. processing and disposal or alternatively the processing alone can take
place in each ULB / municipality, the common facility could be only for safe disposal of waste i.e. an
engineered landfill.
Criteria for Cluster facility: The following criteria have been suggested in the ‘Action Plan for
Management of Municipal Solid Waste’ by Central Pollution Control Board in compliance to the
Hon’ble National Green Tribunal Order dated 05.02.2015 in the matter of OA No.199 of 2014. These
criteria are considered for adopting cluster based approach for setting common waste processing
and disposal facilities:
i) A detailed survey of State / UT with positioning of city / town / village and distance between
them.
ii) Based on local condition, fixing of criteria by the local body to transport the waste for
common disposal point without causing public nuisance and traffic hurdles. An indicative
distance of say upto 50 km for each local body may be feasible. However for smaller local
bodies may difficult to arrange transportation on daily basis. For such villages / towns,
alternative options can be worked-out.
iii) An adequate size of land will have to be acquired which should be free from public objection.
Common facility should not have settlement atleast 3-5 km from its periphery.
iv) Common facility perhaps should not be designed for handling waste say less than 3000-5000
tons per day and this will be depending upon number of towns/villages covered and
corresponding to waste generation. Common facility should consider giving some value back
in terms of end-product and also to be sustainable.
Page 44
v) Common facility should be ‘integrated’ with facilities for sorting, compost, RDF and energy
plant and followed by inert recycling / reuse. Only a fraction of inert waste should go for
land-filling.
vi) Bigger cities generating more than 1000 tons/day should adopt combination of waste
processing technologies which may include; composting, RDF, waste-to-energy (anaerobic or
thermal). Such facilities should meet existing environmental standards and even be designed
with latest state-of-the-art technologies to meet stricter norms. However, State Govt. should
provide proper incentives so that such plants can be sustained and techno-economically
viable.
vii) Smaller town, say generating < 1000 tonnes can go for composting, RDF. In further smaller
town, where waste generation is less than 100- 500 tonnes per day, they can compost and
produce RDF and send it to common facility for power generation. Even at District and sub
divisional level, centralized RDF / Compost facility can be set up.
Likewise for the present zone of study a cluster approach is being proposed by considering the
following aspects, this approach minimizes the scope of public objections, facilitates construction of
large landfill which can be managed professionally in a cost effective manner
 The waste would be processed and disposed of as per the character32ization and quantity of
waste in the respective ULB.
 Transportation Costs
 Availability of area for setting up Regional Landfill Facility
 Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY)
 Ownership of Common Facility
 Form in which waste is to be transported – Raw waste or processed rejects
The Processing technology for each cluster varies as per the quantification of waste and waste
characterization in each cluster. For selection of suitable processing technology several parameters
are considered namely Indian experience, quantity and quality of waste, capital investments, scale of
operation, recurring expenditure, environmental impact etc.
5.6 Aspects under the Cluster Approach
5.6.1 Waste Quantities

If the waste quantities generated from each of the municipality are equal i.e. all in the same range
than having a common facility in any one of the municipalities would not yield any major impact on
the costs for other municipalities as cumulatively the waste quantities would not be of such a big
quantity/volume which would result in reducing capital costs. And also associated with it is the cost
towards transportation of waste from other municipalities to this facility would also be high and may
not get circumvented with the reduction of capital costs in view of the lesser cumulative over all
capacity of the plant.
Normally common facilities are located in the municipality which generates highest waste quantity
for that particular cluster. However in the event that the waste quantities in two municipalities are
Page 45
very high than also location of common facility could be a problem as it would result in higher
transportations costs to the other municipality which need to transport waste.
5.6.2 Transportation of Waste

Cluster approach is best designed when the relative distance between municipalities is less than or
equal to 30 km. Any distances greater than 30 km would not result in any major cost benefits.
Capital costs may come lower but the operation costs would be higher and may not get
circumvented with the lower capital costs. Secondly transportation of waste over large distances
require good planning and command in operations as municipal waste is generated on daily basis
and any delays /breakdown in the system would bring in big crisis to the municipalities. Fleet
Management would become critical in such cases.
5.6.3 Area Availability

Common facilities would require more areas for establishing the integrated waste management
facilities. It would become the responsibility of the municipality where the common facility is
created to ensure that adequate areas are catered to this purpose and also for future expansions.
5.6.4 NIMBY
“Not In My Back Yard” commonly known as NIMBY syndrome is very much prevalent for waste
management facilities. It’s witnessed that people do not accept any waste management facility in
the vicinity for wastes generated by them. And now for a cluster approach where common facilities
are created waste from other municipalities would reach this facility getting public acceptability is a
matter of concern. Even if the project is established, operations-essentially transportation of waste
from municipalities may be effected frequently due to obstructions from the people during
operations phase. This aspect also needs to be considered while planning common facilities.
5.6.5 Ownership of Common Facility
Common facility serves various municipalities. Ownership of the common facility is also a matter of
concern even though the project is operated by a private entity. There are certain obligations and
support to be given to the private entity for establishing and operating of the facility. Each of the
municipality may behave as it’s not their baby and the responsibility would fall under the
municipality where the common facility is located who may be willing or may not be willing to do so.
5.6.6 Form of Waste being transported

As discussed above, common facility could be for
 Both processing and disposal units together i.e. integrated facility (Or)
 Only for disposal unit.
In the former case it requires waste to be transported in raw form i.e. garbage while in the latter
case waste will be inert i.e. rejects arising from processing operations. It’s a known fact that raw
waste occupies very high volume (normally has a density of 0.45 to 0.5 kg/m3) and would require
higher number of vehicles for transportation which would have a very big bearing on the
transportation costs.
While if the waste is processed at individual municipalities where the waste is generated and only
inerts sent to common facility than the quantity to be transported also gets reduced and thereby the
Page 46
transportation costs also get reduced drastically. Moreover in this case delayed transportation of
waste will not impact the operations of the municipality as it’s inert and has no odour hassles.
In view of the above the benefits associated with cluster approach are both technical and financial
can be summarized as below:
Technical:
 This gives greater access to technical resources and professional expertise of different ULB’s
 Use of large and sophisticated equipment (e.g. compactors)
 Stacking of waste up to greater heights that provides larger waste disposal capacity per acre
of land.
 Cost savings in disposal and treatment.
 Proper planning and development of the site will help reduce the public opposition and
NIMBY syndrome.
 Increased distances require the use of transfer stations to increase the efficiency of the
transportation systems.
 Most importantly share scarce natural resources, such as land between the ULB’s and
consequently help in provision of scientific collection, management, processing and disposal
of MSW in an efficient manner within respective zone.
 Furthermore, they facilitate the monitoring of environmental outcomes and performance
due to a reduced number of sites. The approach enables smaller ULBs to achieve compliance
with minimal financial burden.
Financial:
 Reduction in the fixed costs per unit of waste
 Cost saving due to sharing of O&M cost
 Cost Sharing of professional management
 Improved bargaining power to buy better equipment and systems at lower costs
5.7 Concept planning
In view of the above factors, a cluster approach is devised with the following proposed processing
facilities and disposal plan for Jogimamba-Gadwal District. A decentralized waste treatment facility is
proposed at all ULBs and a common landfill facility at Gadwal
Table: Details of the Cluster

S. No Name of the ULB Waste Generation TPD - 2021 Proposed plants
Gadwal Zone 8.5 Rejects Regional Landfill Facility

1 Gadwal 32.5 Compost + RDF
2 Ieeja 12.5 Compost + RDF
 As per the above plan each municipality should establish processing facilities in their
respective municipalities
 Transport rejects / inerts arising from the processing facility to the common treatment
facility. For this purpose required logistic support needs to be established.
Page 47
 Common facility for Waste disposal – in the form secured engineered landfill in the
municipality generating the highest quantity of waste for the cluster under consideration, in
this case at Nalgonda as stated above.
 MOU between the participating ULB’s with cost sharing arrangements (comprising of fixed
O&M cost, creation of ESCROW account, revision of tariff suitably from time to time, etc.)
 A framework should be established whereby a Project Coordination Committee for each
cluster is constituted which comprises representatives of each participating Authority and
the Company/ Utility; and important project decisions during the project development,
implementation and operational stages are taken through this committee.
The summary of the design for these options are presented in the subsequent chapters.
5.8 Gadwal Cluster # 1
In this cluster 2 ULB’s of Gadwal district are involved i.e. Gadwal & Ieeja. The waste is processed at
the respective ULB’s and inerts / rejects only are disposed at the Secured Landfill Facility being
proposed at Sheety Atmakur. Hence this SLF can be termed as a Regional Landfill Facility (RLF) as it
caters to the waste disposal of the district
Composting & Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) >>> I N E R T S >>> Secured Landfill Facility (SLF)
Figure 5-1: Gadwal Cluster
Page 48
CHAPTER 6. PROPOSED SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND

TRANSPORTATION PLAN
6.1 Introduction
This chapter provides Solid Waste collection system and transportation system for the ULB. The
proposed plan includes the planning, infrastructure requirements, quantities, and corresponding
cost estimates for the collection and transportation systems were made in the end of the DPR. The
proposed SWM system is broadly based on 3R Environmental Protection Rules (Recycle, Reuse, and
Recover) and is in accordance with the MSW 2016 Rules. The primary aspects of the proposed plan
include the following:
1. Compliance with Municipal Solid Waste Management & Handling Rules of 2016
2. Compulsory segregation at the source.
3. Provision of segregation infrastructure at all stages of collection and transportation.
4. Waste to be covered at all stages of handling.
5. Reduction of manual handling of waste by providing of proper PPEs to the workers.
6. 100% collection and transportation of the generated waste
7. Maximum recovery of resources by segregation of recyclables and biodegradable waste.
8. Adequate health and safety provisions for workers at all stages of waste handling
9. Regular environmental monitoring at waste processing and disposal facilities
10. Have robust compliant-handling system in place
6.2 Overview of the Recommended C&T Plan
Collection and transportation is the most important component of the SWM operations. The
efficiency of operations is mainly depends on choices of vehicle & equipment.
The suggestions are mainly for:

 Promotion of the practice of segregation and storage of waste at source in THREE bins-for
wet waste, other for dry waste and another for domestic Hazardous waste, so as to facilitate
an organised and hierarchical system of waste collection and disposal, without letting the
waste to reach the ground in the primary and secondary collection stages.
 Organization of door to door collection with community participation on cost recovery basis
and minimize the multiple handling of waste, improvement in the productivity of labour and
equipment
 Containerized secondary storage facilities phasing out open storage
 Daily transportation of waste to the Treatment Plant.
 Creation of awareness for source segregation and storage at source.
 Monitoring the system to increase the productivity
Page 49
6.3 Segregation and Storage of Waste at Source
Source segregation of recyclables (dry waste) and biodegradables (wet waste) will not only provide
an efficient mode for resource recovery, but will also reduce pressure and pollution at Landfill sites,
substantially and also domestic hazardous waste like batteries, expired medicines, bulbs etc. can be
stored separately, which will be lifted separately. It is understood that implementation of such
practices takes time and requires significant cooperation from the public. However, initiation should
be made and efforts should be diverted to progressively increase the segregation practices.
Community Participation indicates various actions that could be taken up to increase the public
participation for the management of Solid Waste.
6.3.1 Segregation of waste at Source

Segregation of the two different fractions of waste could be undertaken without mixing them, but
directly depositing into separate bin / bag as and when generated.
Category 1. Food & Green waste (wet waste)

Cooked/uncooked food, vegetable, fruit, meat, borne, fish waste, leaves, grass
Category 2. Recyclable & Non-bio-degradable (dry waste)
Paper, Plastics, glass, metal, ceramic, rubber, leather, rags, used cloths, wood, stone, sand, ash,
thermocol, straw & packing materials, sanitary napkins and diapers (to be packed and disposed )
Category 3: Domestic Hazardous waste
batteries, expired medicines, bulbs etc.
The efficiency of the proposed Waste

Management Plan described below is
driven by the separation of waste at Domestic
the primary collection level. For this Wet Dry hazardous
purpose, following approach needs to waste waste waste
be adopted by the residents as well as
Municipalities.
 The waste will be stored by the generators in two separate bins, one for bio-degradable and
one for recyclables and another for domestic hazardous waste.
 Waste collectors will collect waste on a day-to-day basis. .
 Domestic Hazardous waste will be collected separately.
6.3.2 Storage of Waste at Source

Separate storage facilities for food/biodegradables, recyclables/non-bio-degradable and domestic
hazardous waste should be encouraged and to ensure that no waste goes to ground and a system of
‘Single handling’ is developed. Residents will be made aware to segregate waste at the source and
store it in separate bins, prior to the collection and transportation by the operator. A 3-bin system of
storage of waste is suggested by MoEFC in its solid waste management guidelines. However, such a
system of segregation in the initial stages of waste management is difficult for the community to
practice. However, a single bin system could be upgraded to a 2-bin system progressively. In the
Page 50
single bin system all the wastes are to be kept in a single bin.
Table 6-1: Elements of Storage
S. No Source Capacity of bins
1. Households 15 lit bins of 3
2. Residential complex Each house with 15 lit bins of 3
Common bins of 120 lit of 3
3. Commercial Establishments 60-120 lit bins of 2 types of bins
4. Bulk Generators 120lit – 240 lit bins
5. Market places 600 – 1100lit
It is proposed one supply of bins by Municipality to all the residents for encouraging segregation at
source.
Table 6-2: Requirements of Bins at Municipality
S. No No. of households Capacity Qty for each house Total
1. 6650 15 lit 2 13310
Segregation of waste at source will be introduced along with door-to-door waste collection. Hotels,
offices, shops and restaurants need to keep adequate number of bins to facilitate easy handling and
transfer of waste to secondary storage points
6.4 Planning of Collection and Transportation System
The collection and Transportation system covers following components

 Door to door collection of waste from source
 Secondary Storage of waste
 Secondary Transportation
The proposed plan for collection and transportation by considering existing waste management
system is as follows:
6.4.1 Primary Collection of Waste
Door to door collection services includes collection of waste from households and commercial
establishments, markets and other waste generating sources. The range of vehicles used for primary
collection, generally are tricycles/pushcarts, auto-tippers, and sometimes small compactors
depending on the area.
It is necessary to provide a daily service to all households, shops and establishments for the
collection of putrescible organic/food/bio -degradable waste from the doorstep because of the
hot climatic conditions . This service must be regular and reliable – recyclable material can be
collected at longer regular intervals as may be convenient to the waste producer and the waste
collector, as this waste does not normally decay and need not be collected daily. At present
door to door collection of waste from households are by Tricycles. It is proposed to continue the
same system on daily basis by introducing Autos in the system for narrow lanes.
Page 51
The door to door collection of waste shall be done on a day to day basis between 5:30am to
1:30pm. The ULB shall ensure that infrastructure is made available for undertaking this activity in
compliance with MSW Rules 2016. Each waste collector may be given a suitable vehicle with a bell
affixed or a whistle may be provided in lieu of a bell. Each waste collector shall be given a fixed area
with a route map for collection of waste.
Table 6-3: Door to door Collection from Households

S. No Details Existing system Proposed system
1 Vehicles Door to door collection of Two compartment Auto-tipper to

waste from Households by carry segregated waste. Should
tricycles. Current cover 80% of households.
infrastructure is not
sufficient and not covering 20% of households cover by
all households daily. tricycles including slums. Tricycles
with 6 bins of 60lit, 4 for wet
waste and 2 for dry waste
2 Storage Storage at generation Storage with segregation – 3 bins
without segregation
3 Frequency Alternate days Daily
4 Timings 5:30AM – 1 PM 6 AM – 2 PM
5 Trips 1-2 trips 3 Trips
6 Households Auto - Covering 400-500 Auto : 800- 1000 H.H
households Tricycles : 200-300 H.H
Tricycle – 200 H.H
7. User fee Not in practice Rs.35-50 per household
collection
8. Crew 2 persons per Auto 3 people including driver for auto.
Auto-Tipper Tricycle
 Capacity – 1.75  60 lit bins of 4/6
 4 wheeled
 Two compartments – one for wet and
another for dry waste
 Hopper with hydraulic arrangement
Page 52
Door step Collection – Commercial Establishments:

At present, commercial establishments like hotels, schools, Hospital and markets etc. are covering by
Tricycles. Waste is being stored road side or at their bins lifting by tricycles and transporting to
dumpsite. It is proposed to encourage all commercial establishments to store their waste in bins at
their premises to lift and also shall have separate bins for wet and dry waste. It is proposed to use
tractors and Autos for collection of waste from commercial establishments.
Table 6-4: Door to Door Collection from Commercial Establishments

1 Vehicles Tricycles Autos /Tractors
2 Storage Road side and partial storage Storage at source level -120 lit –
at generation 240 lit based on their generation
3 Frequency Daily Daily
4 Timings 9 AM – 3PM 10 AM – 3PM
5 Trips 2-3 2-3 trips
6 Efficiency 60% 100%
7. User fee collection Not there User fee from big establishments
8. Crew 1 Driver and 4 crew 1 driver and 2 crew
Vegetable Markets:
1 Vehicles Tricycles Autos
2 Storage Road side and partial storage Storage at 1100 lit bins at market
at generation place
4 Timings 9 AM – 3PM 9AM – 3 PM
5 Trips 1 1
6 Efficiency 90% 100%
Table 6-5: Infrastructure Required
Page 53
1 Households 6650 Nos

2 Waste Quantity 10.55 TPD
Residential
4 No. of HH cover by Tricycles 200 HH
5 No. of TRICYCLES covered HH @25% 7 HH
6 Backup @15% 2 Nos
7 No. of HH covered by Autos 800 HH
8 No. autos required to cover @ 75% of HH 7
9 Backup @15% 1 Nos
6.4.2 Street-sweeping
In order to improve the system, all the roads and lanes having habitation or commercial activities
may be covered on a day to day basis. This may be done by employing one person per 500 m
including commercial & important areas, one person per 500 m in medium density areas and 750 m
in WBM roads i.e., low density areas.
The worker engaged in street sweeping shall be provided with long handle broom, metal trays, Gum
boots, gloves, shovels and uniforms. The sweepers should work in pairs, carrying out the following:
 Sweeping two ‘single beat’ lengths

 Collecting the sweeping in container cart.
 Depositing the sweeping in the nearby container
 Cleaning the container stations with in the beat length
 Kerb-side collection from shops/establishments along the road/street
Table 6-6: Street Sweeping Requirements
S. No Details Qty Units

1 Length of the Road 20 Km
2 Total waste generation from Road sweeping 0.17 Tons
3 Daily sweeping – main roads 4.3 Km
4. Road length covered by one sweeper 500 m
5. No. of sweepers required 9 Nos
6. Alternate days 5.7 km
7. Once in 3day 4.3 km
8. Weekly once 4.3 km
9. One sweeper can sweep per day 750 m
10. No. of sweepers required 6
11. Total sweepers required 15 Nos
12. Total no. of sweepers with weekly relieve 17 Nos
13. No. of brooms 17 Nos
14. No. of Shovels 17 Nos
Page 54
S. No Details Qty Units

15 Wheel barrows@ 1 for 2 sweepers with 10% backup 8 Nos
16 Transportation – tractor 1 No
6.4.3 Drain cleaning
Total length of drains is about 16 km. The total quantity of waste generated from the drain cleaning
is about 0.28 MT per day.
Table 6-7: Drain Cleaning Requirements

S. No Length Waste generation MT No. of vehicles required
1 16 km 0.28 1 TRACTOR
6.4.4 Secondary Storage
The main objective of the secondary collection system is to store the

waste. Temporarily prior to its transportation to Treatment Plant. It is
proposed to use storage bins for sweeping waste, drain silt and
temporary market places which is nearly 10% of the total waste. It is
proposed to use 250 lit capacity bins for storage of market waste and
Litter bins of 100lit capacity for commercial areas for 750m of total road
length.
S. No Type of Bin Capacity Qty

1 250 lit 0.12 7
2 100 0.01 23
It is suggested to use waste sanitizing agents and insect repellents to prevent the menace of
breading of flies and mosquitoes at the secondary storage points.
6.4.5 Domestic Hazardous Waste collection Centre
Domestic hazardous waste stored at household level would be collected separately and transport to
designated Domestic hazardous waste collection centers.
Table 6-8: Domestic hazardous waste centers

S. No Component Area Qty.
1 Domestic hazardous waste deposit centres 20 sq m 1
2. Storage – Bins 600 lit 2
6.4.6 Secondary Collection and Transportation

Waste from Households, commercial establishments and other bulk generators will be lifted by
tractors and compactors.
Page 55
Table 6-9: Secondary Collection and Transportation

1 Vehicles Tricycles Tractors and Autos
2 Storage Road side and partial storage Storage at source level and
at generation community storage for sweeping &
market waste
4 Timings 8AM to 3PM 8am to 1pm and 6 PM TO 10 PM
5 Trips 2 4
6.5 Infrastructure Required for Achieving 100% Collection and Transportation System
The existing vehicles and equipment available with Corporation is as follows:
Table 6-10: Existing vehicles with ULB
S. Name of Year of Condition of the

Total no Remarks
No the vehicle purchase equipment
1 Tricycles 2013 9 Only 7 are 50% of vehicles considered as
working life of tricycle is 3-4 years
Table 6-11: Requirement of vehicles and Equipment
S. No Vehicle/Equipment Existing Required Shortfall

1 Tricycles 4 7 3
2. Auto-tippers 0 7 7
3 Tractors 0 1 1
4 250 lit bins 0 7 7
5 Litter bins 0 23 23
6 600lit for domestic hazardous 2 2
waste
7 Wheelbarrows 0 8 8
The above infrastructure/vehicles are proposed based on primary collection and secondary
collection.
The manpower requirement for driving the vehicles and lifting the garbage is based on shifts. The
total work force required in the primary and secondary collections are formulated in the below
table.
Table 6-12: Required Staff for SWM
Vehicles No. of Vehicles Staff per vehicle Shifts Total staff
Tricycles 7 1 1 7
Auto-tippers 7 3 1 21
Page 56
Sweepers 15.00 1 1 15
Tractors 3 5 1 15
Total field Staff 58
With weekly off 64
Required tools & Equipment

Each worker will be provided with a broom and a dustpan for waste collection and adequate
Personnel Protective Equipments (PPE).
 Number of brooms required – 17
 Number of dustpans required - 17
 Number of pair of gloves - 64
 Number of pair of boots - 64
 Number of uniform – 128(A uniform for a worker will include two sets of uniform for
summers and two sets for winters).
The total infrastructure cost estimates required for the above is covered in the subsequent chapters
6.6 Workshop Facility for Vehicle Maintenance

The Municipality must have adequate workshop facilities for the maintenance of their fleet of
vehicles and containers, etc. The workshop, public or private, should have adequate technical staff,
spares and preventive maintenance schedules to ensure that at least 80% of the vehicles remain on
the road each day and the down time of repair/maintenance is minimized to the extent possible.
Spare assemblies should be kept available which could be given as replacements until necessary
repairs are carried out. The following items are proposed in the Workshop.
 Vehicle washing
 Tyre yard
 Repair center with necessary tools and equipment
 Parking
Page 57
CHAPTER 7. DESIGN AND PLANNING OF TREATMENT PLANT
7.1 Integrated Waste Treatment Facility
Ieeja Municipality is generating approximately 10 tons of municipal solid waste (MSW) per day,
which is mainly disposed in the open dumpsite without treatment.
7.1.1 Site Description
At present there is no designated dumpsite for municipality. The waste collected is dumped without
any segregation or treatment on road side at B.C Colony.
Figure 7-1: Existing Dump Site Pictures
The present dump site falls under the category of uncontrolled solid waste disposal facility. Due to
this scenario, anaerobic decomposition of organic content of the waste is leading to landfill gas
generation, comprising mainly of methane. As, this site is not scientifically managed, there is no
control over the escape of the landfill gas into the atmosphere.
7.1.2 Area Statement
As per the proposal, it is proposed to set up Integrated Waste Treatment facility at Ieja as inerts
transport to Gadwal landfill facility. Below is the area statement broadly showing the area required
against each component at the integrated waste treatment plant. Below given area is tentative and
minimum area required will change at the time of execution.
Page 58
Table 7-1: Area Statement

S. No Facility Area in Acres
1 Compost & RDF Plant 0.50
2 Other Supporting infrastructure, roads, Recyclables storage, Tanks etc. 0.25
3 Green belt 0.25
Total Area 1.00
7.2 Land Reclamation from Old Dumpsites

Since new land to be identified, land reclamation is not proposed at this dumpsite.
7.3 Planning and Design of Treatment Plant
7.3.1 Introduction
Designing any waste management facilities, the following points to be taken into consideration
 Waste quantities generated,
 Design period,
 Waste characteristics of the proposed city.
The Treatment process and suitable technology required for Ieeja ULB is explained in below
chapters.
7.3.2 Identification of Suitable MSW Treatment Technology

The most important objective of municipal waste management is a safe disposal of the waste,
generated daily. This would involve the following activities:
 Separation of recyclable fractions and recycling the same
 Beneficial utilization of organic fraction of the waste
 Disposal of inerts into a scientifically designed landfill
The disposal of waste involves processing to separate or utilize the waste fractions organic and
inorganic, of which the recyclables are sent for recycling whereas the organics which dominate the
proportion go to aerobic composting, vermi-composting or waste to energy conversion. These
different options require many inputs for decision making processes and would involve different
capital investments. A careful consideration of waste quantity generated is also an important part of
this decision making.
Page 59
Table 7-2: Processing Technologies

Influencing Environmental
Technology Limitations Benefits
Parameters Concerns
Composting  Segregation of  Receiving  Reduces organic  Final product
organics from unsegregated waste fraction of manure can
MSW waste MSW contaminate
soil if not
 Quantity of  No yield  Stabilizes organic tested for
organic matter consistency fraction toxic elements
before sale
 Moisture  Slow Process  Potential usable
Content product as  Emissions of
 Sound output particulate
 Market Demand marketing
matter when
arrangements  Potential of
 Location of required composting
moving /
facility handling the
operations with
 Sensitive other waste waste
process – streams  Odour
requires good
problems
segregation  Reduces organic
and waste to landfill
maintenance thereby reducing
the production
of leachate and
gases from
landfill
 Highly useful
product for crop
improvement
 Value addition to
waste resource
 Sustainable
approach
Bio-  Moisture  Higher capital  Completes  Gas handling

Methanization / content cost natural carbon
Anaerobic cycle  Fire & safety
Digestion  Volatile /  Not suitable measures
organic matter for waste with  Recovery of
less energy &  Proper
 C/N ratio biodegradable production of operation of
matter fully stabilized drying Bed
 Segregation of
organic manure
 Non availability  Leachate
Page 60
Parameters Concerns
organic waste of segregated  Control / collection &
waste in the reduction of treatment
 Quantity of municipality Green House Gas from sludge
organic matter emissions like drying beds
 Lack of
 Market Demand methane
financial
resources with  Complete
ULB’s and destruction of
Municipal pathogens
corporations. through
anaerobic
 Requires waste
digestion - No
segregation disease
efficiency transmission by
vectors
 No pre-
processing /
post-processing
rejects
 Reduced burden
on landfills
 Conversion
efficiency 60% to
70%
 Clean
combustion,
compact
burning, high
thermal
efficiency & good
degree of control
 Environment
friendly because
of firewood
savings reduction
in CO2 emissions
 Can be done on a
small scale
Page 61
Parameters Concerns
 Generation of
gaseous fuel
 Free from odour,

fly menace,
visible pollution
 Production of
biogas and high
grade soil
conditioner
 Very low power

requirement
unlike aerobic
composting,
where sieving
and turning of
waste pile for
supply of oxygen
is necessary
 Modular
construction of
plant and closed
treatment needs
less land area
Pelletization /  Segregation of  Competitive  RDF can be  Air pollution

Refuse Derived Organics from with large processed to half from emission
Fuel MSW mass burn the calorific of smaller
plants value of coal quantities of
 Quantity of organics,
Organic Matter  Requires  Lower level of particulates,
secure markets heavy metals in and metals
 Moisture for Fuel RDF
Content Processing  Water
involves high  RDF can be co- pollution due
 Market Demand fired with other
power to leachate
fuels in a variety
 Location of the consumption
and of industrial
facility
maintenance boilers
 More space  Process is self-

requirement sustaining with
Page 62
Parameters Concerns
for fuel value addition
Production
 Resource
 Can cause recovery for
damage boilers economic gain
and pipe work
 Low risk
technology
 Low cost option

for MSW
treatment and
processing
Incineration  Calorific Value  Excessive  Achieves  Emissions

moisture & maximum particulates,
 Moisture inert content in volume SOx, NOx,
Content waste affects reduction emissions,
net energy chronated
 Organic /  Incineration is a
recovery compounds
Volatile Matter standard ranging from
fixed carbon  Auxillary fuel hygienic HCl to organo
support may operation
 Total inerts compounds
be necessary compared to such as dioxins
to sustain open burning and heavy
combustion metals.
 Heat generated
 High capital can be utilized  Toxic metals
which can for production of may
safely be steam / hot concentrate in
burned (i.e., water / ash; fumes
vegetation electricity – from low
cardboard, revenue temperature
paper) may be generation incineration of
more useful if mixed
recovered for  Less land is
municipal
mulching & soil required and
refuse.
improvement minimal burden
on landfills  These fumes
 Residual ash & will contain a
metal waste  Most suitable for
number of
require higher calorific
toxic
disposal waste, etc
compounds,
 Overall  Relatively e.g. from
Page 63
Parameters Concerns
efficiency is noiseless and burning of
low for small odourless. chlorinated
power stations plastics,
 Thermal energy solvents etc.
 Indian MSW recovery for These could be
has low direct heating or a hazard to
calorific value; power people living
hence generation. and working in
supplementary close
fuel is required  Can be located
proximity and
for within city limits,
are generally
combustion, reducing cost of
undesirable in
hence higher waste
the
fuel cost. transportation
environment.
Care and strict
management
of the waste
to be burned
in order to
minimize
contamination
with
undesirable
waste types
will be
required.
Pyrolysis  Calorific value  Requires  Efficient  Air Emissions

extensive pre- electricity include acid
 Moisture treatment to generation gases, dioxins
Content be able to through and furans,
handle MSW combustion of nitrogen
 Fixed carbon
gas through oxides,
 High capital
 Total inerts engines. sulphur
cost and dioxide
 Organic / expensive  Potential to particulates,
Volatile matter O&M. recycle a large cadmium,
proportion of mercury, lead
 Segregation of  Requires residues and hydrogen
Organic waste extensive pre- depending on sulphide.
treatment to the process.
 Quantity of handle MSW  Some of the
organic matter  Smaller units residues may
 High viscosity
Page 64
Parameters Concerns
 Market Demand of pyrolysis oil more acceptable be hazardous
may be and part of an in nature.
problematic for integrated
its system.
transportation
and burning  Capable of being
integrated with
 Net energy other processes
recovery may such as the
suffer in case output from MBT
of waste with / Refuse Derived
excessive Fuel (RDF)
moisture production.
 Reductions in
metal
volatization and
particulates
compared with
MSE combustion
Technologies
 Apart from
generating
power from the
waste, the slurry
produced from
bio-methanation
technology acts
as a good
fertilizer.
 The quantity of
waste gets
reduced by
nearly 60 to 90%
depending upon
the waste
composition.
 The quantity of
residues is low,
typically 3% of
the processed
Page 65
Parameters Concerns
MSW. The
bottom ashes are
inert material
which could be
used as paving
material.
 The energy can

be utilized as
power, heat, or
combined heat
and power, or as
process steam.
 Process if cleaner
than
incineration.
 Atmospheric
pollution may be
dealt superior
way techno
economically.
Gasification  Calorific value  Economic  Converts larger  Air emissions

performance - fraction of
 Organic / costlier organics into fuel
Volatile matter gas
 Requires very
 Segregation of rapid heat  Clean way to
organic waste transfer handle fuel
feedstocks that
 Quantity of
have many
organic matter
impurities
 Market demand
 Moisture
content
 Fixed carbon
 Total inerts
Landfill  Existing and  Land area  Least cost  Can pollute

future waste requirements option. surface runoff
Page 66
Parameters Concerns
quantities  Significant  The gas during rainfall
transportation produced can be
 Waste utilized for  Soil and
cost to landfill
characterization ground water
power
 Methane generation or as aquifers may
 Waste get polluted by
utilization may domestic fuel for
segregation not be feasible leachate in
direct thermal
for remote absence of
 Waste collection applications.
sites proper
and
transportation  Reduced GHG collection &
 Cost of pre- emissions. treatment
 Site selection / treatment to system.
location upgrade the
gas may be  Spontaneous
 Leachate high ignition due to
emissions spontaneous
 Lack of methane
 Potential financial emissions.
methane gas resources with
corporations /  GHG may
 Lining for landfill urban local escape into
bodies the
 Quantities of
atmosphere in
new waste in  Lack of absence of
case of existing conducive inefficient gas
landfills policy with recovery
state govt in process.
terms of land
allotment,
garbage
supply, power
generation &
evacuation
facilities, etc.
In view of the above technologies, most suitable technology for treatment of waste is identified by
taking into account waste characteristics, quantity of waste generated and future population
growth. We have proposed composting for organic waste with dry waste RDF bailing along with
recyclables recovery process.
Detailed treatment process with material balance is explained below
Page 67
7.3.3 Material Balance
The generated MSW in Ieeja city and the waste reaching to the processing facility may not be same.
It will depend on the efficiency of collecting the waste. However by implementing the good MSW
practices in Ieeja the efficiency of collecting MSW may also increases. As per the records the total
MSW generated in Ieeja city is around 10 TPD at present. The plant is designed for the waste
projected quantities in the year 2021 for 12.5 TPD with rejects transport to landfill facility.
In this chapter, the design of integrated waste management facility is presented in detail. The
recyclable unit has been designed to process the recyclables into by products. The inerts (rejects)
would be disposed to the landfill whereas the organic material (compostable in nature) would be
sent to the compost plant and the light combustibles (RDF fluff) would be utilized to produce energy.
Below is the material balance with process flow and treatment technology adopted is explained
Figure 7-2: Material balance
Table 7-3: Material Balance

Component Tonnage (TPD) Percentage (%)
Compost 2 17
RDF 3 25
Rejects to landfill 2.5 21
Moisture Loss 3.5 29
Recyclables – glass , plastic covers, metals etc. 0.25 2
Page 68
Recyclables collected at DRCs in city 0.75 6

Total 12 100
Drain Silt 0.5 To landfill or fill low lying areas
Total 12.5
7.3.4 Dry waste Collection Centers (DRCC):-

It is proposed to setup DRCC’s at city area to collect recyclables from dry waste. It is proposed, all
the dry waste collected shall be routed through DRCCs. The recyclables like plastic covers, PET
bottles, paper etc.., shall be segregated, bailed and stored in different compartments. The remaining
dry waste shall be transported to treatment facility. The number of DRCCs required shall depend on
quantity of recyclables generated in the ULB,
Below is the proposed infrastructure at DRCC:

 A minimum of 150 sq m area required for each DRCC’s
 A bailing machine to bail recyclables at each DRCC’s
Note: The cost allocated for DRCC shall used to setup new facility or upgrade the existing DRCCs in
the ULBs.
7.3.5 Design of Pre-sorting & RDF Plant

The waste reaching the integrated waste management facility is mixed waste, hence, needs to be
segregated before its treatment to produce energy/compost. As our proposed collection and
treatment methodology wet waste and dry waste from households/commercials will be reaching
separately to the treatment plant.
a) Waste Receiving Platform: -
The waste receiving at the treatment plant will be unloaded into the RCC waste platform after
weighing and inspection of the waste. Below are the main functions on the waste receiving platform:
 The bulky material like huge boulders, tyres, coconut trunks and other heavy materials are
sorted out manually and sent to landfill.
 We shall propose manual sorting hand picking of recyclables like plastic covers , glass ,
metals etc., on the platform and stored separately for reselling in the market
 After this the left-out waste mostly combustibles like paper , textiles, coconut shells, pet
bottles, wooden logs/boxes, etc., is fed into shredders to reduce the size of the materials
and then further process to RDF bailing.
b) Shredders Used for Homogenization
Shredders are used to reduce the size of the waste down to 100mm. Size reduction helps in easy
packing of RDF and thereby reducing cost of transportation. Shredders of 1TPH capacity shall be
sufficient for this quantity of waste generation plants.
Page 69
Figure 7-3: Typical Shredders

c) RDF Bailing & Storage: -
The fractions from shredder generally called Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) Fluff. It will have a calorific
value in the range of 2000 - 2500 kcal/kg with 15-20% moisture and 15-20% ash which can be
incinerated in a boiler of the Power Plant. RDF produced shall be transported to the nearby Power
Plant for incineration or shall be providing a go down for storage of RDF material for at least 15 days.
The RDF generated will be stored and sold to nearby existing power plant operators or sell to nearby
Cement plants within the range of 100 km from plant.
d) Typical Figure 7-4: Typical RDF Bailers RDF

Properties: -
MSW collected from different sources has different calorific values. However, after drying and
separation of non-combustible fraction, the RDF produced shall have an average calorific value of
2000- 2500 kcal / kg with particle size of the size of about 100 mm acceptable for combustion in the
Boiler of a Power Plant. The physical properties of RDF fluff produced shall have the following
properties
Physical Properties of RDF Bale
Page 70
 Shape :- Irregular
 Size :- 100mm x 100mm
 Bulk Density :- 100kg/m3 -200 Kg/m3
Proximate analysis
 Moisture : 10 % - 20 %
 Ash content : 10 % - 20 %
 Volatile matter : 40 % - 60 %
 Fixed carbon : 10 % - 20 %
Ultimate analysis
 Moisture : 10 % - 20 %
 Mineral matter : 15 % - 25 %
 Carbon : 35 % - 40 %
 Hydrogen : 5 % - 8 %
 Nitrogen : 1 % - 1.5 %
 Sulphur : 0.2 % - 0.5 %
 Oxygen : 25 % - 30 %
Combustion Properties
 Gross Calorific Value of RDF (Avg.) : 3,000 kcal / kg
 Ash Fusion Temperature
o Initial Deformation temperature : 860 o C
o Softening temperature : 950 o C
o Hemispherical temperature : 1040 o C
o Fluid temperature : 1100 o C
 Chloride Content : 0.04 %
Elemental Ash Analysis (% of Oxides)

 Silica : 53.10 %
 Alumina : 11.18 %
 Iron Oxide : 4.87 %
 Titanium dioxide : 0.89 %
 Calcium Oxide : 13.15 %
 Magnesium oxide : 2.90 %
 Sodium oxide : 5.79 %
 Potassium oxide : 1.56 %
 Sulphur trioxide : 2.55 %
 Phosphorous pentoxide : 1.43 %
e) Construction Specifications and Functions of all the Pre-sorting & RDF Units
The Presorting unit consists of waste receiving platform, presorting shed and RDF unit consists of
RDF process shed and RDF storage go down.
Page 71
Parameter General Requirements

Waste receiving Open to Sky
platform Concrete platform with proper slope shall be provided to prevent
leaching into the ground and to provide hard surface to facilitate
machine movement.
Retention period is 3 days
1.2 to 1.5m high external brick wall shall be provided to avoid wastes
being blown away by the wind and prevent spillage outside.
The drain will be provided outside the wall. There will be an opening
provided in the bottom of the wall to drain the leachate into the drain.
The opening is of 30cm x 20cm size covered by wire mesh structure so
that only liquid can pass through.
Presorting shed/ RDF Roofing is required to protect from rain & Sun
Process shed Concrete platform with proper slope shall be provided to prevent
leaching into the ground.
The Facility will be equipped with hopper, feeding conveyor, shredders,
rejects conveyors and transfer conveyors to be transferred to RDF
baling unit.
RDF Godown Roofing is required to protect from rain & Sun
Concrete platform with proper slope shall be provided for workability.
Storage capacity is for 15 days to store RDF
f) Design of Pre-sorting/RDF Plant
The following are the design concepts adopted to arrive at the sizes of various components of pre-
sorting plant.
Table 7-4: Waste Receiving Platform
Description Quantity
MSW Incoming waste in to the plant in TPD – Dry waste 5 TPD
Duration 3 days
Total quantity of waste for 3 days 15 MT
Density of MSW in ton/cum 0.8
Volume of Waste in cum 19 cum
Stacking Height of waste on windrow plat form in meters 2.5 m
Area required to stack the each day waste on windrow plat form in sq m/day
0.8 sq m/cum
(with base (15m x10m) and top (5m x0m))
Area required for windrow platforms in sq m 15 Sq m
Add extra for working space movement 25%
Total Area required 19 Sq m
Dimensions of platform say 10 m x 2 m
Presorting/RDF shed:- Size of the shed proposed for presorting section is - 15m x 10m
The above dimensions are arrived based on equipment length, no of lines and quantity handled.
Page 72
Storage godown:- Size of the shed proposed for storing RDF & Recyclables - 10m x 10m.
Note:- The above given dimensions are minimum size required for each operation. The actual Size
of the above operations will change as per the site condition & area availability. Drawings
attached for reference.
Table 7-5: List of Processing Machineries & Equipments (Mechanical)
S. No Equipment Nos. Capacity Purpose
Pre Sorting & RDF Proposed single lines with 8 hrs
specification for each line working
1 Feed hopper 1 For homogeneous waste transfer
onto conveyors.
2 Z conveyors 1 1 TPH For conveying Raw waste to manual
sorting stations
3 Shredders 1 1 TPH Reducing the size of the waste for
easy screening.
4 Chain belt Conveyor 1 1TPH For conveying shredded material to
bailing unit
5 Baler 1 1 TPH To bale the combustible material for
easier transportation
Table 7-6: Mobile Equipment for Presorting and RDF Plant Operations
S. No Name of the Equipment Nos.
1 Front End Loader 1
2 Tippers to transport rejects to landfill 1
7.3.6 Design of Compost Plant

The Wet waste collected from households shall be input material for compost plant.
Composting is a process of microbial degradation where organic matter is broken down by a

succession of organisms in a warm, moist aerobic environment (controlled conditions).
Composting is a form of recycling. The composting process of organic waste helps in decreasing the
amount of solid waste that must be sent to a landfill thereby reducing disposal costs. Composting
also yields a valuable product that can be used by farmers, landscapers, horticulturists, government
agencies and property owners as a soil amendment or mulch. The compost product improves the
condition of soil, reduces erosion and helps suppress plant diseases.
Composting is an age old practice and the word compost is as old as agriculture itself. The solid
wastes of plant and animal origin are utilized for conservation of carbon and mineralization.
a) The Compost Production Process
Composting is a process involving bio-chemical conversion of organic matter into humus

(Lignoproteins) by mesophilic and thermophilic microorganisms. A composting process seeks to
Page 73
harness the natural forces of decomposition to secure the conversion of organic waste into organic
manure. Composting can be done in two ways:
a) Aerobic Composting.
b) Anaerobic Composting.
Aerobic composting is more advantageous than anaerobic composting because of

 Rapid decomposition, normally completed within 6 to 8 weeks resulting in reduction
of area required.
 Process is exothermic and the heat generated helps in destruction of harmful
pathogens, eggs of disease carrying vectors and nullification of weed seeds.
 Production of foul smelling gases like methane, hydrogen sulphide is minimized.
 Nutrients are fairly preserved.
In order to accelerate and control the aerobic composting a specially formulated biological inoculum
will be used to treat the organic waste, which is the key element in our technology. The inoculum
will be subject to continuous improvement in composition
b) The processes involved in composting are as follows:

 Organic waste is delivered in a windrow.
 Biological Inoculums is sprayed on the waste in required quantities
 Water is sprayed on the waste or by addition of biological inoculums
 Each windrow is turned on 6th and 11th, 16th & 21st days outside to the center to
provide aeration. This also destroys insect’s larvae.
 Turning is carried out by using front end loaders etc.
 On 28th day windrow is broken down
 Since material is source segregated and only wet waste receives to compost platform
it is suggested to avoid coarse segregation of waste for rejects.
 After this 28th day waste is been sent to monsoon shed for further curing for 2 weeks
 The material after curing is send to 4mm perforations fine screen. The +4mm fractions
are send to
 Screened compost is to be stored for 15 days to ensure stabilization
The schematics of composting process are as follows:
Page 74
Figure 7-5: Flow of compost process
The organic material present in MSW can be converted into a stable mass by aerobic decomposition.
Aerobic microorganisms oxidize organic compounds to carbon dioxide and oxides of nitrogen and
carbon from organic compounds used as a source of energy, while nitrogen is recycled. Due to
temperature reactions, temperature of mass rises.
The final product so produced will be black in colour, fine powdery in nature, has an earthy aroma
and is completely free from pathogenic organisms and weed seeds. This product is the one, which
has undergone sanitization and stabilization. This ensures pH and C/N ratio at the required levels.
Important factors responsible for a scientific decomposition over a specific period of time are as
follows:
Carbon Nitrogen Ratio

The decomposition of organic matter is effected by the presence of carbon and nitrogen.
Decomposition of organic matter is brought about by living organisms, which utilize the carbon as a
source of energy and the nitrogen for building cell structures. More carbon than nitrogen is needed
but if carbon is too high, decomposition decreases. In the soil, another factor enter into the series of
nitrogen cycles, occurring when carbon is in great excess, it is the presence of nitrogen in the soil in a
form available to bacteria. In case too great a ratio, it will result in living microbial cell’s making use
of the available soil nitrogen in the proper proportion. This condition is known as “Robbing’ the soil
of nitrogen and has the effect of delaying the availability of nitrogen as a fertilizer for growing plants.
A C/N ratio of 20 has been widely accepted as the upper limit at which there is no danger of robbing
the soil of nitrogen.
Page 75
The optimum C/N ratio for composting therefore cannot be optimum one for the soil, since, the
living organisms utilize about 30 parts of carbon for each part of nitrogen an initial C/N (Available
quantities) ratio of 30:01 would seem most favorable for rapid composting.
Moisture Content
Aerobic decomposition can proceed at any available moisture content from 30% to 100%, if aeration
can be provided.
In practical aerobic composting, high moisture content must be avoided because water displaces air
from interstices between the particles and thereby give rise to anaerobic conditions. On the hand
too low moisture content deprives the organisms of the water needed for their metabolism.
The maximum moisture content for satisfactory aerobic composting will vary with the material used.
Investigation indicates that the moisture content of the municipal refuse fall in the range of 40 to
60% which is most satisfactory range for aerobic composting. Additives of various types are used
with materials such as night soil, sewage sludge, garbage slop, which contain excessive amounts of
moisture. When the moisture content is too low (below 40%) it may be corrected by adding water to
it.
Temperature
Proper temperature is a very important factor, particularly in the aerobic composting process. High
temperature is essential for the destruction of pathogenic organisms and undesirable weed seed.
The optimum temperature range is between 50°C to 70° C, around 40° C usually being the most
satisfactory. The temperature increase in the mass leads to sanitization where harmful pathogens,
weed seeds are killed. This is also an important one in the composting process.
Aeration
Aeration is necessary for thermo-phillic aerobic composting in order to obtain the rapid
decomposition, fast decomposition that is characteristic of the process and also is useful in reducing
high initial moisture content in composting materials. Several different aeration techniques have
been utilized with varying degrees of success. Turning the material is the most common method of
aeration when composting is done in stacks. Hand turning of the compost in piles or pits is most
commonly used for small villages and farms. Mechanical turning is most economical in large
municipal installations. The most important consideration in turning compost apart from aeration is
to ensure that the material on the outside of the pile is turned into the centre, when it will be
subjected to high temperature. In hand turning with forks, this can be readily accomplished-e.g.,
piles or windrows on top of the ground are simply reconstructed with the materials from the outer
layers placed on the inside of the new piles.
In case of composting in pits, or trenches, the material can be moved from one pit to another for
aeration or if a little space is left at the end of the pit at the initial filling, the material can be turned
within the pit. The loss of volume of the material during the stabilization period will facilitate
turning within the pit. Mechanical equipment for turning windrows in large composting operation
has been developed extensively as a result of the increased interest in composting as a method of
Page 76
refuse disposal.
The important criterion for the high degree of aeration is for the avoidance of anaerobic conditions,
maintenance of high temperature and the control of flies.
pH Value
Decomposition will be faster at a neutral pH range because most microorganisms grow faster under
these conditions. Under aerobic conditions, there will be a drop in pH-value initially which later
begins to rise resulting in a slightly alkaline in the final stage.
Alkaline characteristics in the decomposing stage conditioned with high temperature leads to loss of
nitrogen through volatilization of ammonia. This occurs mostly when composting materials have a
low C/N ratio. Organic matter with pH-value of 5.5 to 8 is suitable for decomposition.
Use of Inoculum
Special inoculum containing several pure strains of developed, laboratory-cultured micro-organisms,
which are essential in the decomposition of organic matter, can be used for accelerated
decomposition and quality improvement.
Microorganism like:
 Bacillus sp.
 Trichoderma sp.
 Aspergillus sp.
 Phanerochaete sp.
Use of inoculum like consortium of degrading microorganisms / cow dung solution has been
recommended mainly to reduce period of decomposition to around 40 to 45 days and also to
prevent foul smell and leachate generation.
7.3.7 Construction Specifications and Functions of All the Compost Plant facilities
The Composting Plant apart from Tipping floor & presorting shall be consisting of the following
facilities and components:
1. Windrow Platform
2. Monsoon shed
3. Refinement Section
4. Godown
Page 77

Windrow Platform Open to Sky
Concrete platform with proper slope shall be provided to prevent
machine movement.

Monsoon Shed Roofing is required to protect from rain.
Height clearance of 5.5m is required for dumping, spreading, mechanical
aeration, and proper ventilation
Concrete platform with proper slope shall be provided to prevent

machine movement.

Refinement Section Roofing is required to protect from rain & Sun

Vibro screen (4mm) rejects material above 4mm and density separator
segregates metals (ferrous and non-ferrous), pebbles, sand and all
undigested but same sized contaminants by weight.
Godown Roofing is required to protect from rain & Sun
Storage capacity is for 7 days.
7.3.8 Design of Compost Plant

The following are the design concepts adopted to arrive at the sizes of various components of
compost plant.
Page 78
Table 7-7: Windrow Platform

MSW Incoming waste in to the plant in TPD 7 TPD
Duration 28 days
Quantity of waste after 28 days assuming 30% reduction 5 TPD
Total average quantity of waste for 28 days 167 MT
Stacking Height of waste on windrow plat form in meters 2.5 mtrs
Area required to stack the each day waste on windrow plat form in sq m/day
0.6 sq m/cum
(with base (30m x15m) and top (20m x5m))
Area required for windrow platforms in sq m 200 Sq m
Total Area required 280 Sq m
Dimensions of Windrow platform 35 m x 8 m
Monsoon Shed:-
MSW Incoming waste in to the plant in TPD 5 TPD
Duration 14 days
Quantity of waste after 8 days assuming 8% reduction 4.6 TPD
Total average quantity of waste for 8 days 67 MT
Stacking Height of waste on windrow plat form in meters 2.5 mtrs
Area required for windrow platforms in sqm 54 Sqm
Total Area required 75 Sqm
Dimensions of Monsoon shed 35 m x 2m
Refinement Section:- Size of the shed - 10m x 10m

Storage go down:- Size of the shed proposed for storing 2.5 TPD for 7 days is - 10m x 2m
Note:- The above given dimensions are minimum size required for each operation. The actual Size
of the above operations will change as per the site condition & area availability.
7.3.9 List of Processing Machineries & Equipments (Mechanical)

The organic waste received is routed to composting plant and decomposing the waste for a period of
28 days and screening after 15 days to separate minute particles of glass, plastic, metals has been
provided. The reject area and the course manure area are set apart. The rejects from the 4mm fine
screen shall be diverted to landfill site.
Equipments are used to turn waste at regular intervals and used to shift the waste for feeding to the
Page 79
machinery. Rejects are pushed and the finished material is also moved to bagging area. The front
end pay loaders are essential for above activities.
Table 7-8: Equipments Required For Compost Plant
S. No Equipment No Capacity Purpose
Windrow management
1 Front End Loader 1 For windrow formation & turning
Slurry Pump Spraying the leachate and inoculum slurry on
2 1
the windrows
SECONDARY SECTION Proposed 1 lines with 8 hrs working

(Refinement )
Drag Chain conveyor to distribute the digested material to next
1 1 1 TPH
screens
Bucket Elevator to lift the digested material vertically to feed
2 1 1 TPH
into next equipment
Trommel- 4mm/vibro to screen digested material through 4mm
3 1 1 TPH
sieve screen
Chain belt conveyor- Z To carry <4mm screened material
4 1
type
Chain Belt conveyor- L to carry screened oversized ( >4mm) material
5 1
type
Grinder to grind digested Organic material coming
6 1
out of the Reject conveyor
Chain belt conveyor- Z to transfer the ground Organic material
7 1
type
Gravity separator with to remove heavy impurities mainly sand and
8 1
Aspirator glass pieces
Chain Belt conveyor to carry the screened compost to the
9 1
godown
Chain belt conveyor to carry oversized impurities coming out
10 1
from Gravity separator
11 Hydraulic Power Pack 2 to generate Hydraulic Power
REJECTS SHIFTING
JCB (Loader with to load rejects into the tippers
1 1
Backhoe)
2 Hydraulic Tippers 1 to transport rejects to the landfill site
Page 80
7.3.10 Market Price of Compost

The price of compost is varying from Rs 1,500 to Rs.2500 per ton depending on the quality of
compost material in different parts of the country. The price of compost depends on the
quality/grade of compost, production process and place where compost sold. Total Revenue
generation is explained in below chapters.
Indicative Market Price of Compost at Various Places

Price
Place Manufacturer Plant(s) At
(Rs./Ton)
Nasik Municipal 1,750 (Loose)
Nasik (Maharashtra) Nasik
Corporation 2,050 (Packed)
Delhi Krishi Rasayan Puri & Delhi; 2500
Delhi Excell Industries Ahmedabad, Calicut etc.; 2500
Ahmedabad Exceil Industries Ahmedabad, Calicut, etc.;, 2500
Kerala Various Various 2500
Andhra Pradesh Various Various 1500 – 2500
7.3.11 Performance standards for compost
Processing of Municipal Solid Waste would be undertaken to ensure that the compost produced
after such Processing is reckoned as being Fit for Sale. The sampling procedure for compost testing is
as set out below. The compost proposed to be sold shall be placed in at least ten heaps of almost
equivalent size. One random sample from each of these heaps shall be taken. Such random samples
shall then be thoroughly mixed and a single random sample taken and tested. In case the
composition of this single random sample satisfies the criteria set out in the table given below shall
be certified as being “Fit for Sale”. Apart from the regular procedure we ensure the samples thus
collected are also analyzed in the authorized test houses periodically.
S. No Description Standards
I Moisture, percent by weight 15.0-25.0
Ii Colour Dark Brown to Black
Iii Odour Absence of foul odour
Page 81
S. No Description Standards
Iv Particle Size Max. 90% material should pass
through 4.0 mm IS Sieve
V Bilk Density (g/Cu.cm) 0.7 – 0.9
Vi Total Organic Carbon, percent by weight, Minimum 16.0
Vii Total Nitrogen (as N) percent by weight minimum 0.5
Viii Total Phosphates (as P2O5) percent by weight 0.5
minimum
Ix Total Potash (K2O) percent by weight minimum 1.0
X C.N. Ratio 20:1 or less
Xi PH 6.5 – 7.5
Xii Conductivity (as dsm-1) not more than 4.0
Xiii Pathogens Nil
Xiv Heavy metal content (as mg/Kg) percent by weight,
maximum
Arsenic (as As2O3) 10.00
Cadmium (as Cd) 5.00
Chromium (as Cr) 50.00
Copper (as Cu) 300.00
Mercury (as Hg) 0.15
Nickel (as Ni) 50.00
Lead (as Pb) 100.00
Zinc (as Zn) 1000.00
Page 82
CHAPTER 8. PLANNING AND DESIGN OF SANITARY LANDFILL
8.1 Introduction
Disposal of Solid Waste

Land filling shall be restricted to non-biodegradable, inert wastes and other wastes those are not
suitable either for recycling or for biological processing. Land filling shall also be carried out for
residues of waste processing facilities as well as pre-processing rejects from waste processing
facilities. Land filling of mixed waste shall be avoided unless the same is found unsuitable for waste
processing. Under unavoidable circumstances or till installation of alternate facilities, land filling can
be done following proper norms. Landfill sites shall meet the specifications as given in schedule III of
the CPHEEO manual.
The basic steps essential for the landfill designs are:

 Landfill sizing
 Site layout
 Landfill layout
 Leachate management
 Landfill gas management
8.2 Proposed Landfill Site Description
The landfill site shall be proposed at new site identified by respective authority to setup landfill
facility along with treatment plant.
8.3 MoEF Guidelines for Landfill Design
Main aspects covering the landfill Design & Construction are:

 To minimize the possibility of contaminating surface and ground water.
 To have control over gaseous emissions.
 To maximize resource productivity.
Leachate control by liner system within a landfill involves prevention of percolation of leachate from
waste in landfill to the subsoil by a suitable protective system (liner system). The liner system is a
combination of drainage layer and barrier layers. As per CPHEEO manual a competent liner system
should have low permeability, should be robust and durable and should be resistant to chemical
attack, puncture and rupture. A liner system comprises of combination of barrier materials such as
natural clay, amended soils and flexible geo membrane made of HDPE.
As suggested by MoEF a composite liner of two barriers made of different materials, placed in
immediate contact with each other provides a beneficial combined effect of both the barriers. The
liner system suggested by MOEF is a geo membrane layer over clay or amended soil barrier. A
drainage layer and leachate collection system is placed over the composite liner system. The
effectiveness of barrier layer basically depends on the hydraulic conductivity of the clay/amended
Page 83
soil liner and density of the geomembrane against puncture. The clay/amended soil liner is effective
only if it is compacted properly and geo membrane liner is effective only if it has the density or mass
per unit area (minimum thickness is specified) is sufficient enough against punctures.
Table 8-1: Layer Configuration Is Proposed for the Bottom of the Landfill
As per MSW Rules’2000
Layer No. Material Description Thickness
Layer 1 Barrier soil layer comprising of clay or amended soil with 100 cm
permeability coefficient less that 1 x 10-7 cm/sec
Layer 2 High density polyethylene (HDPE) geo membrane 1.5 mm
Layer 3 Drainage layer 30 cm
Total Thickness 130 cm
The cross-section of the bottom liner system is given below
Figure 8-1: Base Liner System of Landfill
Page 84
Property Value
1 Thickness 1.5mm
2 Density 0.94 gm/cc
3 Roll Width X Length 6.5 X 171mm
4 Tensile Strength
A Tensile Strength at Yield 23 N/mm
B Tensile Strength at Break 43 N/mm
C Elongation at Yield 13%
D Elongation at Break 700%
E Secant Modulus (1%)
5 Toughness
A Tear Resistance (initiation) 187 N
B Puncture Resistance 530 N
6 Durability
A Carbon Black  2%
B Oxidation induction time in Mins > 100
C Accelerated Heat Ageing Negligible Strength
Changes after 1
month at 1100C
7 Chemical Resistance
A Resistance to Chemical Waste Mixture 10% Strength Change
Over 120 days
B Resistance to Chemical Reagents 10% Strength Change
Over 7 days
8 Environmental Stress Crack Resistance 1500hrs
9 Dimensional Stability 2%
10 Seam Strength 80% or more (of
Tensile Strength)
8.4 Design of Landfill and Landfill Sizing
As discussed earlier, Gadwal treatment facility has been designed as centralized landfill facility. The
Inerts from Ieeja treatment plant are transferred to the landfill facility.
Page 85
The table below shows the quantity of inerts going to landfill each year.
Ieeja Leeja Total Total Inerts per

Year Percentage
Tonnage Tonnage Tonnage annum
2018 29.60 11.29 40.89 0.20 2985
2019 30.54 11.68 42.21 0.20 3082
2020 31.50 12.08 43.58 0.20 3181
2021 32.49 12.49 44.99 0.20 3284
2022 33.52 12.92 46.44 0.20 3390
2023 34.58 13.37 47.94 0.20 3500
2024 35.67 13.83 49.49 0.20 3613
2025 36.79 14.30 51.09 0.20 3730
2026 37.95 14.79 52.75 0.20 3850
2027 39.15 15.30 54.45 0.20 3975
2028 40.38 15.83 56.21 0.15 3078
2029 41.66 16.37 58.03 0.15 3177
2030 42.97 16.94 59.91 0.15 3280
2031 44.33 17.52 61.85 0.15 3386
2032 45.72 18.12 63.85 0.15 3496
2033 47.17 18.75 65.91 0.15 3609
2034 48.65 19.39 68.04 0.15 3725
2035 50.19 20.06 70.25 0.15 3846
2036 51.77 20.75 72.52 0.15 3970
2037 53.40 21.46 74.87 0.15 4099
2038 55.09 22.20 77.29 0.10 2821
2039 56.83 22.96 79.79 0.10 2912
2040 58.62 23.75 82.37 0.10 3007
2041 60.47 24.57 85.04 0.10 3104
2042 62.38 25.41 87.79 0.10 3204
85304
Page 86
The quantity of inert material proposed for the landfill design for 25 years period is 0.85 lakh tones.
8.5 Supporting infrastructure
A Typical layout has been developed showing all the below supporting infrastructure at proposed
new site. All the drawings of each infrastructure has been developed and annexed separately for
reference.
 Gate
 Guard Room
 Weighbridge and scale room
 Admin building, lab & rest rooms (G+1)
 Workers Dining
 Vehicle workshop
 Storage shed
 Wash rooms
 Presorting & RDF Unit
 Compost process unit
 Leachate Pond
 Roads & drains
 Boundary wall
 Greenbelt
Page 87
CHAPTER 9. PROJECT COSTING
9.1 Introduction
The cost estimates for integrated solid waste management system for Ieeja Municipality is worked
out based on the detailed study done by Feedback Infra and its assessment of the MSW
management operations in Ieeja. The existing infrastructure available with the Municipality has been
taken into account and costing for up-gradation of the system is worked out. The additional
investments thus required to increase the efficiency of the system and to meet the norms prescribed
by SWM Rules 2016
9.2 Total Capital Cost of the project
As discussed in earlier chapters, it has been proposed an Integrated Waste Treatment facility for
Ieeja ULB.
The Total Project Cost for Ieeja ULB has been presented below in detail.
Table 9-1: Total Project Cost Break-Up

S. Item Description Amount in Cost Sharing of
No. Rs Lakhs ULB
2 MSW Treatment Plant (Compost & RDF) along with 269.95
associated civil structures & common Infrastructure 100%
3 Cost sharing of Landfill (Phase I) at Regional Landfill 68.48 28%
7 Information education & communication activities @ 0.5% 2.09
Total Project Cost 469.18
Cost breakup for each individual components of Capital cost is shown below in detail
9.3 Capital Cost of MSW Collection & Transportation
Cost for Collection and transportation has been arrived taking into account existing infrastructure at
respective ULBs and thus shortfall with contingences has been proposed to improve the collection
efficiency. As per CPHEEO manual 15% contingencies shall be proposed.
Page 88
Total New
Requirement Unit
Existing Required Total price
Vehicles with Price
in Nos in Nos in Rs
Contingencies In Rs
in Nos
One Time supply of waste 13300 150 1995000
storage bins to house holds
Primary Collection
Tricycles 4 7 3 23000 69000
Auto tippers 0 7 8 510000 4080000
Waste storage Bins
Bins-1100 ltrs 7 7 28500 199500
Bins-600 ltrs 2 2 18500 37000
Litter Bins 23 23 4879 112217
Deposition Centre for 1 350000 350000
Domestic Hazardous Waste
(16 Sq m)
Secondary Transportation
Tractors 0 1 1 850000 850000
Compactors 0 0 0 2700000 0
Equipment for Street Sweeping
Wheel Barrows 8 8750 70000
Brooms 17 100 1700
Metal trays 17 200 3400
Uniforms 128 500 64000
Caps 64 50 3200
Boots 64 300 19200
Masks 64 50 3200
Gloves 64 50 3200
Total Cost of vehicles in Rs 7860617
In Rs Lakhs 78.61
9.4 Operation & Maintenance cost of MSW Collection & Transportation
The O&M cost incurring for waste transportation has been taken into account for each and every
individual component as shown below in detail
Page 89
1 Diesel
Mileage
Distance in Total Diesel Cost Per
Vehicle Nos Trips Travelled Km/Ltrs Liters/Day day @ Rs 62/ltr
Auto Tipper 7 2 30 10 42 2604
Tractors 1 3 30 5 18 1116
Compactors 0 0 0 0 0 0
3720
Total Diesel Cost Per Annum 1357800
2 Manpower- C&T
No of Total Cost
Nos Per Month Months Per Annum
Drivers - Auto tippers 7 12500 12 1050000
Helpers 14 9000 12 1512000
Drivers - Tractors 1 12500 12 150000
Helpers 5 9000 12 540000
Drivers – Compactors 0 12500 12 0
Helpers 0 9000 12 0
Tricycle operators 7 9000 12 756000
Sanitary Inspectors 1 25000 12 300000
Sanitary Supervisors 2 18000 12 432000
Mechanics 1 12000 12 144000
Electrician 1 12000 12 144000
Fitter 1 12000 12 144000
Total Manpower Cost- C&T 5172000
3 Manpower - Sweeping
No of Total Cost
Nos Per Month Months Per Annum
Sweepers 17 9000 12 1836000
Total Manpower Cost- Sweeping 1836000
Total Cost Per

4 Repair and Maintenance Nos Cost Per month
Annum
Tricycles 16 500 96000
Bins 32 150 57600
Vehicles @ 6% per
Annum on Capital Cost 295800
Total Repair & Maintenance Cost 449400
Page 90
Admin & other Misc

5 Expenses per Annum 200000
9015200
Total O&M Expenses for Collection & Transportation System in Rs
In Rs Lakhs 90.15
9.5 Capital Cost of Integrated Treatment Facility (Compost & RDF)
As described earlier, it is proposed to develop integrated treatment plant facility for Ieeja ULB. The
proposed treatment technology has been discussed in earlier chapters. The cost component for each
individual component is explained below in detail.
9.5.1 Cost of Civil infra for treatment plant & Site Development Works for Integrated facility
S. Description of Item Nos Qty Units Unit Rate Amount
No
1 Site clearance 1 4,047.00 sqm 2.90 11,736.30
2 Security cum Office 1 45.50 sqm 15,000.00 682,500.00
3 Scale Room & Weigh Bridge 1 15.43 sqm 22,847.63 352,575.52
4 Weigh bridge Platform 1 54.00 sqm 7,360.76 397,481.11
5 Under Ground Sump (25 kl) 1 27,900.00 Liters 9.00 251,007.90
6 Toilet Block 1 21.00 sqm 27,347.22 574,291.62
7 Compost Plant & RDF 1 525.00 sqm 7,746.40 4,066,860.00
a Tipping Floor
b Presorting & RDF Shed
c Windrow platform
d Monsoon shed
e Screening Shed
f Compost Storage shed
8 Recyclable Stores shed 1 100.00 sqm 14,559.10 1,455,910.00
9 Dry Resource collection Centers 1 150.00 sqm 8,500.00 1,275,000.00
10 Leachate Collection Pond 1 375.00 sqm 1,401.20 525,451.85
11 Boundary Wall 1 254.00 rmt 5,711.18 1,450,639.89
13 Road - 4.0 m Wide (BT) 1 336.00 sqm 1,219.55 409,768.80
14 Storm Water Drain 2 300.00 rmt 3,162.81 1,897,687.76
15 Transformer Yard 1 25.00 sqm 1,500.00 37,500.00
16 Green Belt 1 1,000.00 sqm 175.00 175,000.00
17 Bore Well (Process Water) 1 1.00 nos 150,000.00 150,000.00
18 Plumbing & Sanitary works 1 1.00 LS 75,000.00 75,000.00
19 Electrical Works (Internal) 1 1.00 LS 1,057,000.00 1,057,000.00
Page 91
Grand Total Amount in INR : 14,845,410.76

Grand Total Amount in Lakhs : 148.45
All the above civil costs have been estimated with TS SSR 2016-17
9.5.2 Cost of Equipment & waste handling for Waste treatment facility.
S. Unit Cost Total Amount

No Item Description No in Lakhs in Lakhs
I Presorting & RDF Process
1 Shredders 1 15 15
2 RDF Bailing machine 1 5 5
3 Other Misc 1 1 1
4 Bailing machine at DRCC 2 2 4
Total Presorting & RDF 25
II Compost screening Equipment -4mm fine screen 1 TPH LS 20
III Waste Handling Vehicles
1 Front End loaders with back hoe 1 28 28

2 Tipper 1 15 15
3 PPE & Fire safety 1 5 5
Total Waste Handling Vehicles 48
IV Other Equipments
1 Transformer & Switch yard 1 10 10
2 DG Set 1 5 5
3 Weigh Bridge Equipment 1 6.5 6.5
26.50
Grand Total of Process Equipment with Waste handling In Rs
vehicles Lakhs 121.50
Total Cost of Integrated Waste Treatment facility In Rs
Lakhs 269.95
Page 92
9.5.3 Operation and Maintenance of Waste treatment plant
No of
Working Units Amount in
1 Power Capacity Hrs per day Unit Cost Rs/Year
Shredder & RDF Bailing 10 6 60 8 175200

Composting Unit 10 6 60 8 175200
Other plant area , street
lighting, buildings etc 5 6 30 8 87600
Total Power Cost Per Annum 438000
2 Diesel
Diesel
Mileage Cost Per
Working in day @ Rs
Vehicle Nos Hrs Ltrs/hr Total Liters/Day 62/ltr
Front End loader 1 3 5 15 930
Tippers 1 20 1240
Per day 2170
3 Manpower
No of Total Cost Per
Nos Per Month Months Annum
Plant In-charge 1 50000 12 600000
Production Supervisors 0 20000 12 0
Site Accountant 0 25000 12 0
Store Keeper 0 15000 12 0
Office Assistants 1 10000 12 120000
Mechanic 0 20000 12 0
Electrician 0 20000 12 0
Operators 1 18000 12 216000
Drivers 2 12000 12 288000
Watch and Ward 1 8000 12 96000
Workmen 3 6000 12 216000
Total Manpower Cost 1536000
Cost Per Total Cost Per

4 Inoculum & additives TPD Rs per Ton day Annum
7.00 20 140 51100.00
Page 93
Repair and Maintenance

@ 3% on Equipment Per
5 Annum 364500.00
Admin Expenses per

6 Annum 300000.00
Total O&M Expenses for

Treatment Plant in Rs 3481650.00
In Rs Lakhs 34.82
9.6 Capital Cost of Landfill Facility at Integrated Treatment facility
9.6.1 Cost of landfill facility
The landfill shall be developed in phase wise manner. Below costs of landfill is given for first 5 years
of operation. The next phase of each 5 years shall be developed for 20 years to cater the inerts for
25 years. The area required for each phase is given in chapter 8.
S.
Description of Item No Qty Units Unit Rate Amount
No
I Sanitary Landfill
1.1 Landfill 1 5,250.00 sqm 1,784.96 9,371,024.73
1.2 Capping 1 3,918.79 sqm 1,303.02 5,106,265.18
1.3 Leachate collection sump 1 14.00 cum 12,960.26 181,443.67
14,658,733.59
Equipment for Landfill
1 Front End loaders with back 1 No’s 2,800,000.00 2,800,000.00
hoe
2 Tippers 1 No’s 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00
3 Landfill Compactor 1 No’s 5,500,000.00 5,500,000.00

Total Landfill Equipment 9,800,000.00
24,458,733.59
Total Cost of Landfill Facility In Rs Lakhs 244.59
ULB Share 28% In Rs Lakhs 68.48
Page 94
9.6.2 Operation & Maintenance of Landfill Facility
No of Amount
Working Units per in
1 Power Capacity Hrs day Unit Cost Rs/Year
Common area , street
lighting, buildings etc. 10 6 60 8 175200
Total Power Cost Per Annum 175200
2 Diesel
Diesel
Cost Per
Working Mileage in day @ Rs
Vehicle Nos Hrs Ltrs/hr Total Liters/Day 62/ltr
Landfill Compactor 1 5 12 60 3720
Front End loader 1 5 5 25 1550
Tippers 1 20 1240
6510
3 Manpower
No of Total Cost Per
Nos Per Month Months Anum
Landfill Incharge 1 25000 12 300000
Landfill Supervisors 1 15000 12 180000
Drivers 3 12000 12 432000
Workmen 5 6000 12 360000
Total Manpower Cost 1272000
Consumables like
daily cover , PPEs etc
4 cost per Annum 100000.00
Repair and
Maintenance @ 3%
on Equipment Per
5 Annum 294000.00
Ambient Air
monitoring & Ground
water monitoring
6 Cost Per Annum 200000.00
Total O&M Expenses
for Landfill in Rs 4317350.00
In Rs Lakhs 43.17
ULB Share 28% In Rs lakhs 12.09
Page 95
9.7 Financial Framework
9.7.1 Objective of Swachh Bharat Mission

Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) was launched on 2nd of October, 2014 with a vision to achieve a clean
India as a tribute to the father of the nation, Mahatma Gandhi, on his 150th birth anniversary, in
2019. SBM is being implemented by the Ministry of Urban Development (M/o UD) and by the
Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation (M/o DWS) for urban and rural areas with a given set of
guidelines for improved sanitary services and capacity building initiatives.
 Elimination of open defecation
 Eradication of Manual Scavenging
 Modern and Scientific Municipal Solid Waste Management
 To effect behavioral change regarding healthy sanitation practices
 Generate awareness about sanitation and its linkage with public health
 Capacity Augmentation for ULB’s
 To create an enabling environment for private sector participation in Cap-ex (Capital
Expenditure) and Op-ex (operation and maintenance)
9.7.2 Swachh Bharat Mission Components

The Mission has the five following components:
 Household toilets, including conversion of insanitary latrines into pour-flush latrines;
 Community toilets
 Public toilets
 Solid waste management
 IEC & Public Awareness
 Capacity building and Administrative & Office Expenses (A&OE)
9.8 Funding Pattern for the Project

As solid waste management is important component of the missions, funding provision for the
Municipal Solid Waste Management in Ieeja can be made under Swatch Bharat Mission. As per the
guidelines for Swatch Bharat Mission (Urban), as provided by MoUD-GOI; States will contribute a
minimum of 25% funds for SWM projects to match 75% Central Share. Following table elaborates
the funding pattern for the proposed solid waste management scheme for Ieeja Urban local body
9.9 Source of Finance
Table 9-2: Funding Pattern

S. No. Item Description Amount in Rs Lakhs ULB Share
2 MSW Treatment Plant (Compost & RDF) along with 269.95
associated civil structures & common
Infrastructure 100%
Page 96
3 Cost sharing of Landfill (Phase I) at Regional 68.48

Landfill 28%
6 Information education & communication activities 2.09
@ 0.5%
Total Fund Required Cost 469.18
Financing Plan
Government of India (GOI- 20%) 93.84
State Government (GOI- 25%) 117.29
ULB share with their sources (55%) 258.05
Total Fund Required Cost 469.18
9.9.1 Financing Capital cost of the scheme

The total long term funds required to finance the cost of the scheme aggregates to Rs 4.69 Crores.
The above requirement of funds is proposed to be met by 20% grants from the Swachh Bharat
Mission, 25% from State Government and the balance funds is proposed to be generated through
various other sources of fund which are, but not limited to:
 Private Sector Participation
 Additional Resources from State Government/ULB
 Beneficiary Share
 User Charges
 Land Leveraging
 Innovative revenue streams
 Swachh Bharat Kosh
 Corporate Social Responsibility
 Market Borrowing
 External Assistance
9.10 Municipal Financial Strength
The review of Ieeja Municipal finance indicates that the Municipality has two sets of revenue
 own sources and
 External sources.
The own source of revenue includes components such as Property tax, user charges, other taxes
except the property tax and non-tax own source revenue. Currently there is no user charges levied
on SWM. The Taxes other than property tax include advertisement tax, taxes on animals, carriages &
carts, water charges, market fees, encroachment fee, developmental charges, licenses fees. Non tax
Page 97
comprises of rents from markets, selling of scrap and used paper by the ULB, hire charges (e.g. road
roller) etc.
The components under external sources include Plan grant from State and Central Government,
Non-Plan Grant/compensation, receive the funds from Central and State Government for the
physical infrastructural developments in terms of roads, water supply, sanitation, drainage, buildings
and lightening.
As explained earlier, O&M expenses incurring for ULBs may not be sufficient to meet with municipal
revenues. An addition to above revenues additional revenues & Tipping fee explained below are
required to sustain proposed model to increase the efficiency of SWM in the ULB.
9.11 Revenue Stream
The revenue stream identified for the project includes (i) user fee from various categories of waste
generators viz. households, hotels, restaurants, shops, vegetable/fruit market, institutes, banquet
hall etc. (ii) sale of compost (iii) sale of recyclables.
Two revenue sources under MSW management are sale of compost and sale of recyclables, though
some revenue can be generated by way of collection from the generators of waste. However, all
revenue options put together does not generate income enough to meet operation and
maintenance expenses, therefore, tipping fee has to pay by the ULB to Private Operator.
User fee: The right to collect the user fee towards Solid Waste Management shall remain with the
private Operator. The Private Operator shall not demand or collect fee from the users as per the
proposed user charges to be notified by the Municipality
9.12 Revenue generation from Households & Other commercial Establishments.
The Municipality will collect user charges from households, shops, hotels, banquet halls, restaurants
and guest houses. The households will be charged Rs. 30 in the first year. The user charges hall
gradually increases every year. The expected user fee collection efficiency is assumed to be 70% in
the first year which shall increase to 75 to 80%% in the later stages of the project
User Charges Total User

S. No Type of Waste Generators Number Rate Per charges Per
Unit/Month Annum
1 Households 6650 30 2394000
2 Shops/Malls/Complexes 750 100 900000
3 Hotels 11 200 26400
4 Institutions 2 200 4800
Page 98
5 Veg. Markets small 1 1000 12000

6 Hospital/Clinic 6 200 14400
7 Convention Halls 1 500 6000
8 Worship 2 100 2400
9 Meat Shops small 15 50 9000
Total User Chares Collected Per Annum in Rs 3351600
Total User Chares Collected Per Annum in Rs in Lakhs 33.52
Assuming 70% Collection efficiency in First Year 23.46
9.13 Revenue generation from Sale of Compost & RDF
It is proposed that the Private Operator for the Compost plant shall be responsible independently for
Production and sale of the compost. As the sale of compost has been taken into consideration as
one of the revenue sources for the private operator, the operator shall be encouraged to develop
suitable market and strategy for the sale of compost. The private operators can develop a detailed
plan including market map, compost storage, agents, bulk buyers, transportation road network etc.
It is estimated that compost plant will produce 2 MT (2018) of compost per day which can be sold at
the rate of Rs.1.5 per kilograms. Revenue per annum from sale of compost is given in table below
Rate of Compost Total Revenue

S. No Description of Item TPD
per Ton per Annum
Compost generated in First year of
1 operation 2 1500 1095000
Total Revenue generated in Rs Lakhs 10.95
S. Rate of RDF Total Revenue

No Description of Item TPD per Ton per Annum
RDF generated in First year of
1 operation 3 500 547500
9.14 Revenue generation from Sale of Recyclables
S. Rate of Recyclables Total Revenue

No Description of Item TPD per Ton per Annum
Total sellable recyclables collected in First
1 year of operation 0.25 2500 228125
Total sellable recyclables collected in from
1 DRCC Centers 0.75 2500 684375
Page 99
9.15 Total Revenues
S. No Description of Item Total Revenue per Annum
Revenue from User charges collected from households and

1 Commercial establishments 2346120
2 Revenue from sale of Compost 1095000
3 Revenue from sale of RDF 547500
4 Revenue from sale of Recyclables 228125
5 Revenue from sale of Recyclables DRCC Centers 684375
Total Revenue generated in Rs 4901120
9.16 Tipping Fee calculation
I Tipping Fee for Collection & Transportation of waste Rs in Lakhs per Annum
O&M Cost for ULB Municipality
Operation and maintenance cost of Collection &
1
Transportation from first year of operation 90.15
2 Add for Contingencies @ 2% 1.80
Total O&M Cost –A 91.96
Revenues from the user charges from first year of operation to

3
ULB 23.46
Revenues from the sale of recyclables from first year of
4
operation to ULB from DRCC Centers 6.84
Total Revenues B 30.30
Total O&M Cost including revenue (A-B) 61.65

Total Waste Quantity per Annum in 2018 3650
Tipping Fee per MT for C&T 1689.04
The tipping fee for C&T including revenue from user fee and recyclables is Rs 1689/MT
II Tipping Fee for waste treatment plant operator Rs in Lakhs per Annum
O&M Cost for ULB Municipality
1 Operation and maintenance cost for Treatment plant 34.82
Operation and maintenance cost share for Regional landfill
2 facility 12.09
3 Add for Contingencies @ 2% 0.94
Total O&M Cost –A 47.84
Page 100
4 Revenues from the sale of Compost 10.95

5 Revenues from the sale of RDF 5.48
6 Revenues from the sale of Recyclables 2.28
Total Revenues B 18.71
Total O&M Cost including revenue (A-B) 29.14

Total Waste Quantity per Annum in 2018 3650
Tipping Fee per MT for Processing and disposal for

Treatment plant operator 798.27
The Tipping fee estimated at Rs 798/MT for plant operator including revenue from the sale of
compost RDF & Recyclables.
Proposed Structure and Assumptions: -

 Collection and Transportation shall be carried out by ULB and Processing and Disposal
Facility to be maintained by Private Operator
 Processing and Disposal Facility shall be maintained by single operator
 One-time capital cost for the development of integrated facility shall be borne by the
municipality
 The user fee collection efficiency is assumed to be 70% in the first year and to be increase
gradually up to 90%.
 The user fee collected from households and commercial establishments shall be considered
the revenue generation of ULB.
 It is assumed that the revenue from recyclable waste shall be given to sanitary workers. In
case, the revenue is retained by the municipality, effective expense is calculated
 The private operator shall be compensated on the basis of Tipping Fee by the ULB.
 The revenue generation from sale of compost and recyclables to be retained by Private
Operator.
 Increment rate of 5 % to be taken for tipping fee for subsequent years
 Increment rate of 5 % to be taken for revenue generation from commercial establishments
and compost plant for subsequent years
 Increment rate of 2% to be taken for revenue generation from recyclable waste for
subsequent years
 Increment rate of 5% on fuel charges, 10% on salary and wages, 2% on packing cost, 7% on
consumables and 2% on repair & maintenance for subsequent years.
Below are the options given for project structuring and financing. ULB can also raise funds from
financial institutions to part finance its share. The exact financing pattern and share of the respective
financing institutions would however be decided by the Competent Authority approving the financial
plan for financing.
Page 101
9.17 Project Structuring
9.17.1 Possible PPP Options
A. Design-Build (DB) or Build-Transfer (BT)
Under this model, the private partner designs and builds the facility in accordance with the
requirements specified by the government. Once completed, ownership and responsibility for
operation and maintenance are transferred back to the public agency.
Strengths Weaknesses
Access to private sector expertise. Loss of owner control
Possibilities for financial savings and Difficulty and increased cost of changing
Innovation in design. contract or including additional features
into design
Flexible procurement procedures potential for more A more complex award procedure
efficient Construction
Reduced construction time If life-cycle approach not taken, there is
the possibility of higher operating and
maintenance costs, which may offset the
benefits of lower capital costs to the public
sector
Transfer of risk from public to private sector
single point of accountability
Fewer construction claims
B. Design-Build-Operate (DBO) or Build-Transfer-Operate (BTO)
Here, ownership of the facility is transferred back to the public sector upon completion of
construction. However, the public body then leases it back to the private company for a specified
period, usually a long-term lease, giving the private organization the opportunity to recover its
investment and generate a reasonable rate of return.
Page 102
Access to private sector expertise. In the event of default of performance or
Potential cost savings. bankruptcy, it is potentially extremely
Ownership of the asset remains in the public sector. difficult to terminate the contract or
Contracting out of operations may potentially limit any remove the private company.
provincial or Central taxes.
Authority over levels of service and fees charged are
retained by the public agency.
It avoids legal, regulatory and tort liability issues (in
contrast to the BOT model below).
Government retains control over service standards,
operational performance and asset maintenance.
There is the possibility to terminate the relationship if
agreed upon levels of service or performance
standards are not met.
Potential savings in the areas of design, construction
and architecture, as well as operation.
C. Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) or Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT)
Under this model, a private partner is awarded a franchise by the government to finance, design,
build, operate, maintain and charge fees on the service for a specified time period. Once the
franchise relationship is concluded, ownership of the asset returns to the public sector.
Private sector financial resources are maximized. Transfer of operations and financial responsibility
back to the public sector may occur at a time when
operating costs are increasing.
It ensures that the facility constructed is the most Loss of public sector control over capital,
efficient and effective possible, based on life-cycle construction, and initial operations.
costs.
It enables the private sector body to assume If the initial contract is not well drawn up, the
responsibility for operations for a predetermined arrangement may be unable to address future
duration. difficulties.
The community can benefit from the development Unless the public sector subsidies the costs of
of the project without incurring sizeable debts, or service use, fee levels can be set by the private
having to make a large, upfront expenditure entity.
The private sector entity assumes responsibility for Compared to the BTO model, there is less public
all start-up problems control over the service
Possible cost savings arise from access to private In the event of default of performance or
sector experience, management, labour, bankruptcy, it is potentially extremely difficult to
Page 103
equipment and innovation terminate the contract or remove the private
company.
Risk to the public sector is reduced, as this is shared
with the private company
D. Design-Build-Finance-Operate/Maintain (DBFO, DBFM, or DBFO/M) or Build-Own-Operate

(BOO)
Under this structure, the private organization finances, designs, builds, operates and maintains the
project. It is paid by the government throughout the duration of the contract, according to the
services delivered and whether these meet specified standards of performance. There is no
requirement that the private company will transfer ownership of the facility back to the public body.
The public sector plays no role in either provision There is no guarantee that the private company
or operation of the facility. will operate the service in the ‘public good’.
It allows public sector regulation of the private Unless the service is specifically regulated, the
sector’s delivery of a ‘regulated’ or ‘monopolistic’ public sector cannot set or adjust its price.
service area.
The service can be operated by the public sector All federal, provincial and municipal tax
in the most efficient manner, both in the short regulations apply.
and long term.
The public sector does not have to put up capital Due to the lack of competition, it is necessary
to finance the project. to develop rules and regulations concerning
operations and pricing.
Private facilities generate public revenues in the
forms of income tax and property tax.
The long-term nature of the arrangement gives
the private developer an incentive to invest large
amounts of capital.
E. Wrap Around Addition (WAA)
Here the private partner is contracted to construct an addition to an already existing public asset or
facility. It may then operate that addition for a specified period of time or until there has been a
reasonable return on the investment.
The public sector does not have to find the It may be difficult to incorporate at a later date
capital to finance the upgraded service. any future upgrades of the facility not included in
the original contract.
The private partner assumes the financial risks. Altering existing contracts with the private
partner can be expensive.
Page 104
The public sector gains the construction Perceived loss of control.
expertise of the private entity.
There is the potential for fast-tracked Contract awarding procedures become more
construction, using techniques such as design- complex.
build.
Procurement processes can be more flexible.
Construction can be made more Efficient.
The time period needed for Implementation can
be reduced.
F. Lease-Develop-Operate (LDO) or Buy-Develop-Operate (BDO)
Under this model, a private sector organization purchases a facility from the public sector,
modernizes or improves it, and then assumes operational responsibility under a contract with the
local government. It is expected that the private partner will invest in modernization and then be
given a specified period of time in which to realize a return on the investment.
The local government benefits from a significant Loss of control of the service or Infrastructure,
cash infusion when the Private company buys either perceived or actual.
the facility.
Capital for financing the upgrade is provided by There is potential difficulty in valuing assets for
the private rather than Public sector. sale or lease.
Both parties gain opportunities for Increased Issues may arise if selling or leasing Public assets
revenue. that have received grant funding.
Users benefit from improved services and In cases of private company failure, the local
facilities. government may need to revert to providing the
service or facility.
The public sector has access to the construction It may be difficult to incorporate at a later date
expertise of the private Organization. any future upgrades of the facility not included in
the original Contract.
There is the potential for fast-tracked
construction, using techniques such as design-
build.
Procurement processes can be more Flexible.
The time period needed for Implementation can
be reduced.
Among these different approaches to structuring PPPs, there are variations in regard to the extent of
participation by the private sector in public service provision, the different amounts of risk
transferred to the private partner, varying natures of assets and facilities, and in the different
arrangements for ownership of these. The degree of private involvement required by a particular
project is determined by the public agency. Factors influencing this decision include the project’s
goals and objectives, the level of control the government requires, and the PPP consortium’s ability
to provide the service needed. Such decisions will also be constrained by the existence of regulation
Page 105
and legislation affecting the arrangement, and the need to attract private resources and generate
future revenue.
9.17.2 Project Financing Options
Scheme for financial support to Public Private Partnerships in Infrastructure (Viability Gap
Funding):
The Government of India recognizes that there is significant deficit in the availability of physical
infrastructure across different sectors and that this is hindering economic development; whereas the
development of infrastructure requires large investments that cannot be undertaken out of public
financing alone, and that in order to attract private capital as well as the techno-managerial
efficiencies associated with it, the Government is committed to promoting Public Private
Partnerships (PPPs) in infrastructure development; and the Government of India recognizes that
infrastructure projects may not always be financially viable because of long gestation periods and
limited financial returns, and that financial viability of such projects can be improved through
Government support. Now, therefore, the Government of India has decided to put into effect the
following scheme for providing financial support to bridge the viability gap of infrastructure projects
undertaken through Public Private Partnerships.
This scheme will be called the Scheme for Financial Support to Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) in
Infrastructure. It will be a Plan Scheme to be administered by the Ministry of Finance. Suitable
budgetary provisions will be made in the Annual Plans on a year-to- year basis.
In this scheme, unless the context otherwise requires:
Eligibility
In order to be eligible for funding under this Scheme, a PPP project shall meet the following criteria:
o The project shall be implemented i.e. developed, financed, constructed, maintained and
operated for the Project Term by a Private Sector Company to be selected by the Government or
a statutory entity through a process of open competitive bidding; provided that in case of
railway projects that are not amenable to operation by a Private Sector Company, the
Empowered Committee may relax this eligibility criterion.
o The PPP Project should be from one of the following sectors:
a. Roads and bridges, railways, seaports, airports, inland waterways;
b. Power;
c. Urban transport, water supply, sewerage,
d. solid waste management and other physical infrastructure in urban areas;
e. Infrastructure projects in Special Economic Zones; and
f. International convention centers and other tourism infrastructure projects;
o The Empowered Committee may, with approval of the Finance Minister, add or delete
sectors/sub-sectors from the aforesaid list.
o The project should provide a service against payment of a pre-determined tariff or user charge.
o The concerned Government/statutory entity should certify, with reasons:
Page 106
a. That the tariff/user charge cannot be increased to eliminate or reduce the viability gap
of the PPP;
b. That the Project Term cannot be increased for reducing the viability gap; and
c. That the capital costs are reasonable and based on the standards and specifications
normally applicable to such projects and that the capital costs cannot be further
restricted for reducing the viability gap.
Government Support
The total Viability Gap Funding under this scheme shall not exceed twenty percent of the Total
Project Cost; provided that the Government or statutory entity that owns the project may, if it so
decides, provide additional grants out of its budget, but not exceeding a further twenty percent of
the Total Project Cost.
Viability Gap Funding under this scheme will normally be in the form of a capital grant at the stage of
project construction. Proposals for any other form of assistance may be considered by the
Empowered Committee and sanctioned with the approval of Finance Minister on a case by-case
basis.
Viability Gap Funding up to Rs. 100 Crore (Rs. One hundred Crore) for each project may be
sanctioned by the Empowered Institution subject to the budgetary ceilings indicated by the Finance
Ministry. Proposals up to Rs. 200 Crore (Rs. Two hundred Crore) may be sanctioned by the
Empowered Committee, and amounts exceeding Rs. 200 Crore may be sanctioned by the
Empowered Committee with the approval of Finance Minister.
Unless otherwise directed by the Ministry of Finance, the Empowered Institutions may approve
project proposals with a cumulative capital outlay equivalent to ten times the budget provisions in
the respective Annual Plan.
In the first two years of operation of the Scheme, projects meeting the eligibility criteria will be
funded on a first-come, first served basis. In later years, if need arises, funding may be provided
based on an appropriate formula, to be determined by the Empowered Committee, that balances
needs across sectors in a manner that would broad base the sectoral coverage and avoid pre-
empting of funds by a few large projects.
Approval of project proposals
Project proposals may be posed by a Government or statutory entity which owns the underlying
assets. The proposals shall include the requisite information necessary for satisfying the eligibility
criteria.
Projects based on standardized/model documents duly approved by the respective Government

would be preferred. Stand-alone documents may be subjected to detailed scrutiny by the
Empowered Institution.
Page 107
The Empowered Institution will consider the project proposals for Viability Gap Funding and may
seek the required details for satisfying the eligibility criteria.
Within 30 days of receipt of a project proposal, duly completed as aforesaid, the Empowered
Institution shall inform the sponsoring Government/ statutory entity whether the project is eligible
for financial assistance under this Scheme. In case the project is based on standalone documents
(not being duly approved model/standard documents), the approval process may require an
additional 60 (sixty) days.
In the event that the Empowered Institution needs any clarifications or instructions relating to the
eligibility of a project, it may refer the case to the Empowered Committee for appropriate directions.
Notwithstanding the approvals granted under this scheme, projects promoted by the Central
Government or its statutory entities shall be approved and implemented in accordance with the
procedures specified from time to time.
In cases where viability gap funding is budgeted under any on-going Plan scheme of the Central
Government, the inter-se allocation between such on-going scheme and this scheme shall be
determined by the Empowered Committee.
9.17.3 Procurement process for PPP Projects
The Private Sector Company shall be selected through a transparent and open competitive bidding
process. The criterion for bidding shall be the amount of Viability Gap Funding required by a Private
Sector Company for implementing the project where all other parameters are comparable.
The Government or statutory entity proposing the project shall certify that the bidding process
conforms to the provisions of this Scheme and convey the same to the Empowered Institution prior
to disbursement of the Grant.
9.17.4 Appraisal and monitoring by Lead Financial Institution
Within four months from the date on which eligibility of the project is conveyed by the Empowered
Institution to the concerned Government/statutory entity, the PPP project shall be awarded in
accordance; provided that upon application made to it by the concerned Government/statutory
entity, the Empowered Institution may extend this period by not more than two months at a time.
The Lead Financial Institution shall, within three months from the date of bid award, present its
appraisal of the project for the consideration and approval of the Empowered Institution; provided
that upon application made to it by the concerned Government/statutory entity, the Empowered
Institution may extend this period by not more than one month at a time.
The Lead Financial Institution shall be responsible for regular monitoring and periodic evaluation of
project compliance with agreed milestones and performance levels, particularly for the purpose of
disbursement of Viability Gap Funding. It shall send quarterly progress reports to the Empowered
Page 108
Institution which will make a consolidated progress report once every quarter for review by the
Empowered Committee.
9.17.5 Disbursement of Grant

A Grant under this scheme shall be disbursed only after the Private Sector Company has subscribed
and expended the equity contribution required for the project and will be released in proportion to
debt disbursements remaining to be disbursed thereafter.
The Empowered Institution will release the Grant to the Lead Financial Institution as and when due,
and obtain reimbursement thereof from the Finance Ministry.
The Empowered Institution, the Lead Financial Institution and the Private Sector Company shall
enter into a Tripartite Agreement for the purposes of this scheme. The format of such Tripartite
Agreement shall be prescribed by the Empowered Committee from time to time.
9.17.6 India Infrastructure Project Development Fund (IIPDF)
To support the development of credible and bankable PPP projects, a revolving fund with an initial
corpus of Rs. 100 Crores has been set up in the Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance,
GoI during 2007-08, to be offered to the private sector. The India Infrastructure Project
Development Fund (IIPDF) provides financial support for quality project development activities. The
Sponsoring Authority will thus be able to source funding to cover a portion of the PPP transaction
costs, thereby reducing the impact of costs related to procurement on their budgets.
Eligibility:
o The proposals for assistance under the Scheme would be sponsored by Central Government
Ministries/Departments, State Governments, Municipal or Local Bodies or any other statutory
authority.
o To seek financial assistance from the IIPDF it would be necessary for the Sponsoring Authority to
create and empower a PPP cell to not only undertake PPP project development activities but
also address larger policy and regulatory issues to enlarge the number of PPP projects in
Sponsoring Authorities’ shelf.
o The PPP project should be from the sectors that are eligible for viability gap funding under the
Government of India’s scheme for Financial Support to PPPs in infrastructure or any other
sectors with the approval of the Finance Minister.
o The IIPDF is available to the Sponsoring Authorities for PPP projects for the purpose of meeting
the project development costs which may include the expenses incurred by the Sponsoring
Authority in respect of feasibility studies, environmental impact studies, financial structuring,
legal reviews and development of project documentation, including concession agreement,
commercial assessment studies (including traffic studies, demand assessment, capacity to pay
assessment), etc required for achieving Technical Close of such projects, on individual or turnkey
basis, but will not include expenses incurred by the Sponsoring Authority on its own staff.
o The IIPDF will be available to finance an appropriate portion of the cost of consultants and
Transaction Advisors on a PPP project where such consultants and Transaction Advisors are
appointed by the Sponsoring Authority either from amongst the Transaction Advisors
Page 109
empanelled by Department of Economic Affairs or through a transparent system of procurement

under a contract for services.
The IIPDF will fund up to 75 percent of the project development expenses to the Sponsoring
Authority as an interest free loan. 25 percent will be co-funded by the Sponsoring Authority. On the
successful completion of the bidding process, the project development expenditure would be
recovered from the successful bidder. However, in the case of failure of the bid, the loan would be
converted into grant. In case the Sponsoring Authority does not conclude the bidding process for
some reason, the entire amount contributed would be refunded to the IIPDF.
To seek project development funding from the IIPDF, the Sponsoring Authority will apply to the PPP
cell in DEA through the Memorandum for Consideration accompanied with the Preliminary Report of
the project (in six copies). The MFC would provide justification for understanding detailed feasibility
studies to be taken up for financing out of the corpus of the Fund in the prescribed Proforma. The
proposals that do not envisage VGF can also be submitted for funding. Proposals for funding under
these Guidelines would cover the entire gamut of PPP projects.
Page 110
CHAPTER 10. INFORMATION, EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION

(IEC)
10.1 Introduction
IEC & Public Awareness on waste management

is an extremely important component for any
successful Solid Waste Management
programme, in addition to ‘proper legislation,
technical support and funding. This has also
been a key strategy under the Swach Bharath
Mission of Govt of India. This targets the
“Behavioral Change communication” to ensure
that waste management is mainstreamed with
the general public at large. It also covers issues
of proper management of municipal waste. The
focus of the program is on the households,
commercial establishments, etc. Sensitization of
community towards efficient waste management and its related health and environmental
consequences is the key because a clean community is a direct reflection of a clean city / town.
Goals of IEC Program

1. To raise the awareness among the people about importance of cleanliness, solid waste
management
2. To Motivate people positive behavioral changes
3. To propose source segregation
4. To promote principle of 3 R’s
3 R’s:
One of the goals behind IEC is to make principle of 3 R’s as a part of
life at every stage of waste management. The 3 – R’s (Reduce, Re-
use and Recycle) have produced demonstrative cost effective
methods in handling of urban waste and also in conservation of
resources.
The solid waste management hierarchy has been globally

recognized as per the following illustrative diagram.
Enhancing Reuse & recycling and minimization of generation with source segregation are essential to
the success of any Solid waste management program. It hinges on voluntary participation from the
members of community (waste generators) and requires a robust awareness program on a continual
basis.
Page 111
MSW has got a direct relationship with pollution of air, water, soil and sanitation, hence it is
extremely essential to impart a need based education and awareness to various levels of society.
Strategy of IEC:
Following steps needs to be followed for development of effective Strategy for IEC:
 Need Assessment
 Goal Setting
 Framework of IEC
 Development of IEC activities
 Development of Dissemination Plan
 Evaluation of Dissemination plan
10.2 Identification and Orientation of Resident’s Welfare Committees:
Management of solid waste and its effectiveness is primarily dependent on the attitude, co-operation
and participation of the local community. People in all walks of their day-to-day activities generate
waste, which however, can be collected only once or maximum twice in a day. The other critical aspect
of waste management is the location of waste management facilities such as dumper bins or the
disposal site. There have been number of cases where in the community has objected to the location
of these facilities in their neighbourhood. Popularly known as ‘Not in My Back Yard (NIMBY)
Syndrome’, it is the general perception of the public that location of any of these solid waste facilities
will create the problem of health and hygiene. In light of the above facts, it becomes imperative that a
successful implementation of any solid waste management system will need effective cooperation and
co-ordination of the local community in various aspects of waste collection, transportation and
disposal.
The steps involved in implementing and ensuring community participation will comprise of the
following activities;
 Identification of Resident Welfare Associations (RWAs) whose members can contribute
expertise or resources and can share the responsibilities of planning and implementing the
program.
 Identification and mobilisation of Non-Governmental Organisations or other social welfare
groups in the city
 Identification of areas of SWM where community participation is elicited like schools,
institutions, offices, commercial areas, common community areas (parks), etc.
 Orient the citizens, key personalities, social activists, politicians and local corporators
towards environmental education and solid waste management
 Conduct sanitation campaigns in various parts of the city emphasising on areas where their
co-operation / participation is sought
 Carry out mass media campaigns on various aspects of solid waste management
It is also important to identify areas where the active involvement of community participation is
elicited and work out the modalities of the same. Some of the areas that have emerged from
Page 112
experience elsewhere in the country, in which the community can contribute to waste management,
are,
 Avoid indiscriminate throwing of waste by residents, shop keepers, etc on the streets
 Segregate and store the waste at source
 Hand over the waste to the sanitary workers
 Understanding the importance of dumper bins at various localities of the city and their
criticality in the efficient management of waste and therefore co-operating while the shifting
of dumper bins
 Understanding the importance of Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Recovering of various
recyclables in the waste and their utility.
Once the above is explained to the representatives of RWA’s the same will be conveyed to the
community directly or through various means of technology, so that a sense of community
‘ownership” is developed. People involved in planning and implementing a project will feel that the
program belongs to them. Community ownership helps to ensure greater participation on collection
day as well as community pride about the outcome of the program.
10.3 Identification and Mobilization of NGOs or Social Welfare Groups NGO

Involvement
The success of IEC is largely depending on the voluntary participation of the community at large. The
local government, the developer and Non-Government Organizations (NGO’s) etc have a large role
to play in this regard. In recent years it can be observed that NGOs have taken up initiatives to work
with local residents to improve sanitation. They have been playing an active role in organizing
surveys and studies in specified disciplines of social and technological sciences. In the field of
garbage management, such studies are useful in identifying areas of commercial potentials to attract
private entrepreneurs. They can play an important role in segregation of waste, its collection and
handling over to local authorities.
Many NGOs are committed to improve SWM practices to protect the environment and have been
very active in this field, hence are successful in creating awareness among the citizens about their
rights and responsibilities towards solid waste and the cleanliness of their city. These organizations
promote environmental education and awareness in schools and involve communities in the
management of solid waste. They may be persuaded to actively support the new strategies
recommended in this report and associate in public awareness campaigns. Any organization willing
to perform independently in conducting programs for sections of public on the new SWM strategies
should be encouraged to do so through direct support or through use of the corporation resources /
facilities.
Page 113
A few visuals to capture mass awareness programs in Hyderabad
The corporation can involve NGO’s as ‘pressure groups’ which can bridge the gap between
government and civic society in waste management. The NGO programmes can be tailor made to
suit the requirement of the city, so as it serves the purpose of
 Creating mass awareness, ensuring public participation in segregation of recyclable material

and storage of waste at source. The awareness programs should be suitably designed to take
the concept of SWM and source segregation into the community through audio-video means
and through folklore methods so that the message percolates deep down into the society.
 Provide employment through organizing door-to-door collection of waste.
 Ensure public participation in community based primary collection system.
 Encourage minimization of waste through in-house backyard composting, vermi-composting
and biogas generation.
 Most of the slum pockets can be covered by staging street plays to educate the slum
dwellers and general public.
10.4 Use of Schools and Colleges
Children are powerful communicators and most of the information received at schools is sure to
influence their parents and the
respective households. To get more
response to the efforts in MSW
management, the corporation may
motivate schools in the city to
display posters, messages in the
class rooms, school campus and if
possible take rallies early mornings
carrying placards, banners which
convey brief messages against
littering and illicit dumping of waste
in the city. The strategy should be
channelized into each lane and by
Page 114
lane so as the message is received strongly by the people. Large number of schools if involved
simultaneously would be an added advantage to publicize the big picture in a short duration and
more effectively. Important environmental events like environment day, earth day, water day, etc.,
can be utilized as platforms to gather children along with their parents to convey this message.
10.5 Orientation of Key Personalities, Social Activists and Policy Makers Involvement of
Professional Communicators
If messages are not conveyed in the right way, they may not yield the desired results. Professional
inputs are necessary in developing a strategy for effective communication of strategies. If key
community leaders / personalities participate in the planning process, they can help build
community acceptance and support for the project. In addition, local officials will know the mood
and interests of the community and can help avoid or overcome sensitive issues.
Most large advertising agencies have Social Marketing experts to convey civic messages effectively.
They can be contacted at the city level to create suitable messages with catchy titles for various
uses, preferably free or at cost as a public service, so as these messages get the “best buy” tag by
getting publicized through well-known personalities.
Involving Commercial Sponsors

Firms and organizations can be encouraged to adopt certain areas of waste management and
sponsor the cleanliness drive. An incentive mechanism can be introduced to reward the Good
Samaritans or the associations championing the program in the communities and contributing
towards civic cleanliness.
Waste Management & Corporate Social Responsibility: CSR has become an

integral part of operations in any organization because CSR is a
responsibility of an enterprise for their impact on the society. Hence,
options may be explored in getting sponsorships from the CSR funds of
organizations or check in fitting waste management into CSR, because
it reduces the impact on the environment and contributes to
employment and development of green economy. This will in-turn
enhance the brand image and reputation of the sponsoring
organization. Therefore, CSR can become a communicating and
dialogue arm of sustainable waste management in the city.
10.6 Conduct Sanitation Campaigns
People’s attitudes influence not only the characteristics of waste generation, but also the effective
demand for waste collection services. Attitudes may be positively influenced through awareness-
building campaigns and educational measures on the negative impacts of littering, improper
segregation at source, inadequate waste collection with regard to public health and environmental
conditions, and the value of effective disposal. While many current initiatives lead to visually cleaner
areas, it does not encourage sustainable practices that reduce littering and illegal dumping in the
long run. More emphasis is required on awareness creation relating to the implementation of the
Page 115
waste hierarchy. As such, waste minimisation and waste separation at source needs to be
encouraged to enhance reuse and recycling activities. Willingness to pay for waste services will also
improve with increased awareness as a result of increased insight into the benefits of waste services,
as well as the actual cost thereof.
Such campaigns should also inform people of their responsibilities as waste generators and of their
rights as citizens to waste management services. Corporation should undertake massive public
awareness campaigns on sanitation and establishing its link to public health, hygiene and the
environment through various means including - radio, social media, documentaries, plays,
workshops, etc. For this purpose a dedicated environmental awareness section is required which can
function with the Medical and Health Section in the corporation whose prime responsibility is to
continuously undertake awareness campaigns and drive home the point like
 Clean-up campaigns in schools;
 Printing of pamphlets on different topics;
 A waste message in the municipal newsletter / newspaper;
 Celebration of environmental days/events;
 Training and workshops for generators of waste;
 An hour slot per month on the local radio station to discuss different environmental issues
and answer queries;
 Display slogans on transport vehicles and containers to encourage the public to keep their
town/ city clean.
 Door to door education: This involves the deployment of some of the community members
(who were given training themselves before going out) to go to people’s houses talking to
them about environmental issues, including waste management, especially illegal dumping.
 Introduce innovative ways of attracting the involvement of stakeholders, wherever there is
incentive people will participate. However, the focus should be on preventing littering and
not incentives for cleaning after littering. The latter might drive a wrong behaviour.
 Promote Reuse and Recycling techniques by instructing operators producing domestic and
non-domestic products, food as well as non-food to seriously endeavour to use re-usable
packaging materials so that after the delivery of goods, the packaging materials could be
collected back and used over and reused again.
 Direct operators to promote incentive and product discount to consumers for the return of
packaging or bottling materials in good condition, to the waste producers or retailers to
promote re-use. The cost of packed articles and article without the packaging material could
be kept different with a choice to the consumers to take the article without the packaging
material at low cost.
 Should suggest manufacturers to introduce the Multi-use bottling practices. Hard-to-recycle
packaging like PET bottles metalised plastic films and multi-film packs must be phased out
unless producers take responsibility for their recall and recycling or re-use.
Promotion of viewing the waste as a resource, thereby encouraging economic competitiveness

through resource efficiency. Efforts should be made to encourage collection of such re-usable
material through waste collectors, waste producers, NGOs and private sector instead of allowing
reusable waste to land up at the disposal sites. Bottles, cans, tins, drums, cartons can be reused and
excess packaging materials can be recycled.
Page 116
10.7 Media Campaigning and Environmental Awareness
Information Hot-line
The key to success of any public-education, awareness and motivation program is to provide
maximum means of communication for the public to interact, promptly and conveniently with the
policy-makers and to seek clarification / share ideas or give suggestions which can be constructively
used in the waste management program. A telephone hot line or Post Box number for written
communications could be an ideal way to have inputs from people. This should be manned during
working hours (or even later) by polite, responsive and dynamic persons who are well informed and
have a liking for the subject at all times. These communication channels (one or more) can be set up
and monitored by using suitable in-house staff or linking it to the environmental awareness section.
This awareness wing should be financially independent by allocating appropriate budget for the
associated activities, as below
 Publicity through local cable network may be 20 times a day on alternate days in the first
year and twice a week in the following year.
 Advertisement in all local newspapers twice in the first quarter and to be repeated once in a
quarter subsequently.
 Distribution of pamphlets and display of banners over a period of one year.
 Organize one street play in every slum through NGOs for one year.
 Organize 4no’s of rallies by students per year for two years.
 Awareness training to municipal staff. 1/2 day for sweepers & 1 day for supervisors.
 Awareness campaigns through group meetings over a period of one year
Use of Cable TV and Cable channels

This is a very powerful medium and can be used to
advise citizens not to litter and instead keep two bins for
the storage of waste at source, one for biodegradable
waste and another for recyclable waste. Citizens may
also be advised to cooperate in handing over their waste
to the waste collector on a day to day basis as per the
collection arrangements and timings prescribed by the
municipality. This network can also publicize the contact
numbers of the officials for addressing their grievances
on Solid Waste Management.
Use of Hoardings/banners
Special Hoardings/banners may be put in the town covering messages seeking public participation.
Alternatively, all Municipal-licensed Hoardings should have a space reserved for civic messages. This
will add a "socially-aware" image to the advertisers and will not reduce the usefulness of the
hoarding to them at all. The messages can be those developed by advertising agents to promote any
of the recommendations of this new waste-management policy. The Hoardings should also publicize
the hot-line numbers etc.
Page 117
Advertisements in Newspapers
Advertisements may be given in local
newspapers from time to time to create public
awareness. Local newspapers can also be
requested to start a regular Suggestion Box on
the city page to improve Solid Waste
Management services in the town. They may
also be requested to give coverage to successful
initiatives that have overcome such problems in
a constructive way.
Issue of handbills
Council may get handbills printed with
photographs showing the new system of waste
management and advise the people to
cooperate in making their town clean and
healthy. Such handbills could be prepared from
the professionals for effective delivery of
message. Council can use newspaper delivery
services for distribution of handbills besides
distributing the same through health
department network.
Use of networking websites and instant message sharing technologies

Council may use the emergence of latest message sharing technologies like whatsapp, facebook,
twitter, etc., to disseminate information, take complaints and address the grievance of the general
public.
The subject of Solid Waste Management has remained neglected for the past several decades with
the result that the level of service is highly inadequate and inefficient. For improving the Solid Waste
Management (SWM) services it is essential to adopt modern methods of waste management
methods with right choice of technologies, which can work in the given area successfully.
Simultaneously, measures to be taken for institutional strengthening and internal capacity building
so that the efforts made can be sustained over a period of time and the system put in place can be
well managed. For sustainability of waste management practices in any given area, training and
capacity building of the employees and everyone responsible for Solid Waste Management in the
Urban Local Bodies is the most important aspect without which the effective waste management
would be unattainable.
In Solid Waste Management (SWM) the people, partnerships, coalitions, resources and skills are
essential to its successful implementation and hence all these are included under the large umbrella
of the term “capacity”.
Page 118
10.8 Capacity Building Methods
There are many approaches to providing capacity building services, like:

 Providing access to repositories of information and resources (for example, databases,
libraries and web sites)
 Trainings (public, customized or on-line)
 Consultation (for example, facilitating, expert advice and conducting research)
 Publications
 Web based forum for interaction among different players
10.9 Capacity Building in Solid Waste Management
The approach to capacity building in SWM should be not only about technology and economics but
also about:
 Understanding the administration systems for waste management and related activities
(multidisciplinary and cross-sectoral).
 Understanding the need for human resource development to achieve better results in SWM.
 Focus on building sound institutions and good governance for attaining improved SWM.
Delineating strategies for sustenance of achievements.
10.10 Strategic Framework for Capacity Building
The following diagram illustrates the capacity building framework in general. The framework is
premised on four core areas: (i) situation analysis (ii) creating the right vision and mission (iii)
drawing up the correct strategy and corresponding action, and (iv) measures for sustainability.
10.11 Training Needs
The plan should invariably indicate the target group

or agencies to be capacitated for effective
implementation. The major key factor for any
training is depend on identification of target groups,
for effective waste management implementation
there are various groups/levels of people in the
community who are major target groups.
The following are major target groups:

 Senior level officers-Decision makers
 Middle level officers-Managers and technical
staff
 Junior Level –Technical staff
 Unqualified ground-level staff
 Elected members
 Members of NGOs and private participants if any
Page 119
Appropriate training programmes have to be organized for staff on the concepts of SWM, health,
environmental, legal implications and functional aspects depending on the knowledge levels and
their organizational positions. Every person involved for the SWM in ULBs has to be well-versed with
the process, methods of SWM implementation.
10.12 Proposed Course Contents for Training

Training needs should be identified for various levels
including top and middle management, supervisors
and ground staff. The training should be customised to
the level of competence and awareness of the
manpower involved in the SWM system. Training
needs could be identified at each organizational level.
A training calendar could be devised with course
content depending on the need assessment.
General contents of the training courses at various levels are outlined below.
The suggested general course content for training the various levels of people in the SWM system is
as given below:
 Introduction to SWM
 Sources and types of solid waste, waste generation rates density, composition
 Ill-effects waste generation and improper disposal in terms health and environmental
aspects
 Importance of SWM
 Salient features of the Municipal Waste (Management & Handling ) Rules 2000
 Practices in other parts of the country through audio visual presentations, films
 Waste reduction and material recovery
 Importance of segregation & storage, primary collection systems
 Rag picker activity and the role of informal sectors
 Role of governing bodies
 Planning an efficient sweeping and collection system,
 Tools and Equipments for SWM
o Transfer depots, container collection,
o Transportation- vehicle selection, alternatives for collection vehicles, vehicle routing
o Processing options, composting, market for compost
o Sanitary land filling,
o Statutory and environmental requirements, site selection and procurement, site
development, operation, monitoring and closure of sites
o Role of community, NGOs and their participation
o Private Sector participation
o Technical and Financial aspects of SWM
o Institutional aspects of SWM and their strengthening
o Management Information System of SWM
Page 120
As per the training need assessment and the targeted audience. The training content has to be
updated regularly and frequently so that latest developments could be included in the material.
The training programmes for the workers could be conducted in an informal manner and in the local
language.
10.13 Management Information System

Good management is the key for effective
implementation and success of Solid Waste
Management. This requires collection of critical
information which is not just for keeping the records
up to-date but used effectively for taking corrective
measures as well as proper planning for future.
Existing information has to be collected to have an
overall idea of the prevalent situation and develop an
effective management system for the future.
Information that highlights any deficiency in the
existing system can be used in taking corrective
measures and such information has to be collected at
regular intervals to monitor the system.
Geographic Information System (GIS) and MIS has to be integrated into the SWM system. Similarly,
citizen interface could be maintained by frequently seeking their feedback and suggestions.
Information that needs to be recorded and studied includes relevant information of the department
for planning process as well as specific information related to employee performance, effectiveness
of the training programmes, availability, adequacy, operation and maintenance of the equipments
and vehicles involved in SWM, the performance of the processing plants, information related to
landfill sites etc.
A list of items on which the data should be collected and kept on record for planning purpose and
monitoring the activities done by various sections of SWM has to be prepared and be utilized by the
local bodies. A check list/format would be developed for data collection for the records and
information. (Sample format attached)
The following information needs to be collected and updated from time to time:
1. Profile of the Town

a Area of the town/city;
b Population of the town/city;
c Decadal growth of population;
d Number of wards, their area and population
e Ward-wise information in regard to
o Population density in different wards;
o No, of Households, shops and Commercial Establishments
Page 121
o Vegetable/fruit/meat/fish markets
o Number of Hotels & Restaurants
o Number of Hospitals and Nursing Homes
o Number of Industries
o Number of slum pockets /their population
o Road length and width
o Percentage of area covered with under-Ground sewage system
o Percentage of area having surface Drains
o Percentage of area having no drainage Facility
2. WASTE GENERATION
a Seasonal variations in daily waste generation
b Total quantity of waste produced annually during last 3 years
c Breakup of the quantity of wastes generated
o Household, shops and establishment waste;
o Vegetable and food market waste;
o Meat, fish and slaughter house waste;
o Construction & demolition waste
o Hospital waste
o Industrial waste
d Average quantity of waste produced each day.
e Average number of carcass removed each day
3. STAFF POSITION
a Number of sanitation workers deployed in the city for the collection of waste
b Number of sanitation workers deployed for the transportation of waste
c Ward-wise allocation of sanitation workers
d Sweeper-population ratio in each ward
e Sweeper-road length ratio in each ward
f Sweeper-supervisor ratio in each ward
4. OTHER MANPOWER INVOLVED
1. Contract workers
2. NGO / CBO - Voluntary workers
3. Private players and their detailed information
4. Welfare Measures for workers like Uniforms, Housing, Healthcare, Loan for education.
5. WASTE STORAGE DEPOTS
a Number of sites designated/notified for temporary waste collection (Dust bins/open sites etc.)
b Type and size of Dustbin/open site provided in each ward.
c Ward-wise Quantum of waste generated each day
6. TRANSPORTATION
a Number of vehicles available with the local body for the transportation of waste, their type,
size and age.
b Number of trips made by each vehicle in one shift.
c Number of vehicles used in:
o First shift
o Second shift &
Page 122
o Third shift
d Quantity of waste transported in each shift.
e Total quantity of waste transported each day.
f Percentage of waste transported each day.
7. COMPOSITION OF WASTE GENERATED
a Total quantity of Organic Waste
b Total quantity of Inorganic Waste
c Toxic Material Content
d Recyclable waste
8. WASTE PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL
a Number of waste processing and disposal sites in the city.
b Their distances from the Centre of the city.
c The area of these sites
d The quantity of waste treated/disposed of at each site
f The expected life of each land filled site
9. FINANCIAL ASPECTS
a Operating cost
o Cost of collection per ton/day
o Cost of transportation per ton/day
o Cost of disposal per ton/day
b Allocation of revenue and Capital budget for SWM Vis a Vis the City Corporation's budget
10.14 Monitoring of SWM Services:
For the day-to-day monitoring of SWM services, the following data may be collected, compiled and
analyzed.
10.14.1 Daily Reports

Daily reports of the following to be sent by supervisors to higher officials
(1) Collection of waste

 Number of sweepers required to report for duty
 Number of sweepers actually reporting for duty
 Number of sweepers absent
 Areas left unattended
 Arrangements made or proposed to be made for clearing the backlog
(2) Inspection by supervisors for street sweeping & primary collection

 Number of persons under his supervision
 Number of persons supervised during the day
 Number of cases where performance found satisfactory
 Number of cases where performance was not up to the mark
 Action taken or proposed to be taken
 Complaints received and attended
Page 123
(3) Inspection of cost recovery services such as Hotels, Hospitals, commercial streets and
offices
 Number of cost recovery sites
 Number of sites inspected
 Deficiencies noticed
 Complaints received and attended
 Action taken or proposed to be taken
(4) Inspection of Bulk Community Waste Storage Sites:

 Number of sites in the area under his charge
 Number of sites found well maintained
 Number of sites found ill maintained or needing repair or replacement
 Action taken
 Number of unauthorized waste disposal sites or sites identified during field visits.
 Action taken
(5) Inspection of secondary waste collection points

 Number of sites in the area
 Number of sites found well maintained
 Number of sites found ill maintained or needing repair or replacement
 Action taken
 Number of unauthorized waste disposal sites or sites identified during field visits
 Action taken
(6) Inspection of silt removal sites & building waste disposal sites
 Number of silt removal sites inspected
 Number of sites found satisfactory
 Number of sites where silt was found lying outside the man hole or surface drain
 Number of construction sites/construction waste disposal sites visited
 No of sites where construction waste where there was unauthorised dumping
 Action taken
 Daily Report to be sent by Zonal Engineers
(7) Transportation of waste

 Number and type of vehicles and equipment required to report for duty
 Number and type of vehicles and equipment which actually reported for duty
 Breakdowns reported during the day and action taken
 Number of trips made to the disposal site by each vehicle
 Number of bins cleared during the day
 Number and locations of bins left un-cleared and
 Arrangements made or proposed to be made for clearing the backlog
Page 124
(8) Quantities of waste transported

 Number of vehicles deployed during the day or night
 Number of trips made
 Quantity of waste transported
 Number of vehicles which did not make adequate trips
 Number of vehicles which carried less garbage
 Action taken or proposed to be taken against defaulters
There should be route maps and duty charts with each of the supervisory staff, who should check
whether work on site is going as per schedule and whether vehicles and manpower are giving their
optimum output. Mobile phones or other communication networks essential for effective
communication and monitoring of services should be provided to Zonal Engineers & supervisors.
(9) Inspection of Processing Sites:

 Whether the plant was functional during the week
 Whether it received the garbage as prescribed regularly
 Whether the site is properly maintained and waste stacked properly.
 Quantity of Bio organic fertilizer / desired material produced
 Quantity of production sold during the week
 Quantity of end product in stock
 Any irregularity noticed
 Action taken
(10) Inspection of Waste Disposal Site:

 Name of the site inspected
 Whether all the staff were present on duty during the week
 Whether the required machinery was available on site on all the days
 Whether the approach road and internal roads are properly made
 Whether the weigh bridge is functional and properly used
 Quantity of waste received at the site on the days during the week
 Whether the entire waste was spread, compacted and covered on the same day.
 Whether communication facilities such as telephone, wireless etc., remained
functional during the week.
 Whether shelter and drinking water facility is adequate
 Deficiencies noticed
 Remedial action taken or proposed to be taken
(11) Training Programme Monitoring

 Topic of the training
 Date of training programme
 Type of training programme
 Targeted organization level
 No. of attendees
Page 125
 Feedback from the attendees
(12) Complaint Redressal Mechanism

 Name of the complaint cell
 Ward/Location of the complaint cell
 Nature of complaint
 Details of the complaint
 Action taken
10.14.2 Monitoring and Evaluation of Daily Reports
Monitoring & Evaluation Monitoring and evaluation

(M&E) of activities provides with better means for
learning from past experience, improving service
delivery, planning and allocating resources, and
demonstrating results as part of accountability to key
stakeholders. It also help as a tool for focused
improvement and to identify key issues.
Tools such as Performance Indicators, Formal

surveys, Rapid Appraisal Methods, Participatory Methods, Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness
analysis, Impact Evaluation etc., could be used for monitoring and evaluation. The output as well as
outcome will be thoroughly monitored using the appropriate tool. This will help proper evaluation of
the capacity building activities and taking corrective action, as found required.
Page 126
CHAPTER 11. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN
11.1 Objective
The purpose of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is to minimize the potential
environmental impacts from the project and to mitigate the consequences. EMP reflects the
commitment of the project management to protect the environment as well as the neighboring
populations. The potential environmental impact envisaged from the project is studied on the
following environmental components.
 Air pollution from the vehicular movement, DG set and Power generation
 Fugitive emissions during the construction phase
 Water pollution due to the Leachate generation
 Noise Generation
11.2 Environmental Management Plan
Preparation of Environmental Management Plan is required for the formulation and monitoring of
environmental protection measures during and after construction of the proposed project. The plan
should indicate the details as to how various measures proposed to be taken for mitigation of
adverse impacts if any from the proposed project.
The following sections describe the Environmental Management Plan for the proposed Integrated
Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility during the construction as well as the operation phases.
11.2.1 Construction Phase

Construction activity involves site levelling and construction of admin building, windrows platform,
Municipal Solid Waste storing Sheds, Leachate Treatment Plant etc., are envisaged. However during
construction activities if any dust is generated, it will be controlled by using water spraying on roads
and other dust generating sources. No additional sanitation facilities are required as most of the
labours will be hired from local villages. The effect of noise on the nearby habitation during
construction activities will be negligible as the nearest habitat is more than 0.5 km from the project
site. However construction labour would be provided with noise protection devices like ear muffs,
and occupational safety ware. Moreover it is recommended that all noise generating equipments are
to be stopped during night time.
11.2.2 Operation Phase

The facility has always aimed at sustainable development and in this context only it has
implemented several measures to curtail pollution to maximum extent. This is achieved by deploying
technologies like full-fledged proper stack height for dispersion of DG set emissions, Leachate
treatment plant. Proposed Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility has a dedicated
Page 127
green belt area and is also proposing to have acoustic enclosures for lowering the noise levels
coming out from the DG set and other noise generating equipment.
11.3 Air Pollution Control
The sources of air emission identified from the proposed Integrated Municipal Solid Waste
Management facility during construction, operation stage, paper recycling process and Construction
and Demolition(C&D) Waste Processing. DG set, vehicular emissions and Methane Gas Flaring during
operation stage are expected. Due to the proposed power plant particulate matter, sulfur dioxide,
and oxides of nitrogen and fugitive dust are expected. Following mitigation measures are taken to
overcome the air pollution emissions.
Table 11-1: Air Pollution Control Measures

S. No. Air pollutant Source Control
1 SO2, NOx DG sets Adequate stack height, acoustic enclosure
2 Dust, SO2, NOx Vehicles Black carpeted roads shall be maintained
properly to reduce dust.
3 SPM Processing of Particulate Matter controlled by providing highly
C&D Waste efficient (99.9%) Electrostatic Precipitators (ESPs)
to limit outlet concentration to 115mg/Nm3.
The other control measures for reducing dust emission should include the following good house-
keeping practices:
 Covering open operations to prevent dust entrainment by the wind
 Construction of wind breaking walls
 To reduce the drop height of dusty material
 Regular cleaning and wetting of the ground within the premises
 Establishment of a green belt along the periphery of the crushing area and roads to arrest
the spread of particulate matter arising from vehicular movement inside the area
 Construction of metalled road paved within the premises;
 Fine dust accumulated in the crushing area should be periodically removed and placed in
dumps covered with tarpaulins to arrest the spread of dust;
 Conveyor chutes should be provided at the discharge points;
 Fine powder should be collected at the ground level and disposed of immediately; and
 As an occupational safety measure, all the workers should be provided with approved dust
masks to prevent dust from entering into the respiratory system.
The following methods of abatement will be employed for the air pollution control from the
proposed power plant.
a) Reduction of emission at source

To control the major pollutants envisaged from the proposed power plant the following methods of
abatement will be employed for the air pollution control.
Page 128
 Particulate matter will be controlled by providing highly efficient (99.9%) electrostatic

precipitators (ESPs) to limit outlet concentration to 100 mg/Nm3.
 Chimney with appropriate height need to be proposed for adequate dispersion of sulfur
dioxide;
 Emission of NOx will be controlled through low NOx burners;
 Adequate dust suppression system (water spray system) and dust extraction systems will be
installed in the waste handling and storage areas, and transfer points;
 Green belt will be provided around the plant boundary. Plantation along the internal roads
will be undertaken;
 All the internal roads will be concreted/asphalted to reduce the fugitive dust due to
vehicular movement; and
b) Stack Gas Monitoring

The emissions from the stack will be monitored continuously for exit concentration of sulfur dioxide,
oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter. PM levels if found exceeding the limit, necessary control
measures will be taken to bring them back within standards. Sampling ports would be provided in
the stacks according to CPCB guidelines.
c) Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

The concentration of SPM, RPM, SO2, NOx and CO in the ambient air within the project boundaries
and outside the project boundaries (adjoining villages) would be monitored.
d) Meteorological Observations
The dry bulb temperature, wet bulb temperature, wind speed, wind direction, cloud cover, rainfall
and solar radiation will be recorded daily.
11.4 Odour Control
The odour nuisance is spread over a radius of 0.75 km to 1.0 km at proposed facility surroundings.
Due to the proposed facility the waste may be treated in a planned manner so that the odour can be
minimized. The odour management is more critical issue in landfills. The principles which need to be
adopted are to minimize the number of sources of odour generation which exist in site. To
undertake direct management of odour generating sources that give rise to odour problems.
The mitigation of odour can be achieved by the followings:
a) Using Deodorants for control of odour at compost plant

The deodorants may work effectively on the below mentioned points.
 Reducing ammonia odors in the bedding lanes
 Controlling moisture content of the MSW on the windrow
Improving integrity/longevity, Reducing NH3 CO2 & Other Greenhouse gases,
 Absorbing nitrogen & improving manure compost, and improving air quality & reducing
groundwater contamination.
b) Daily cover and compaction at the tipping face
Page 129
Once waste has been deposited at the working area of a landfill (the ‘tipping face’) it is usually made
flat with a bulldozer and compacted by large machines with specialized studded steel wheels, called
compactors. The operating area of a landfill is covered progressively through the day with a layer of
earth, clay or a similar material. This cover helps minimize blown litter and odour from fresh waste.
Instead of using soil as daily cover by using heavy duty hessian, plastics and foams the odour
nuisance can be minimized.
c) Landfill engineering and liners

The containment landfill sites have to be ‘lined and designed to prevent the uncontrolled escape of
gas and leachate to the environment. The materials used are usually of compacted clay, plastics or
composites. Liners are engineered on the base, sides and, the top of a landfill site (called capping)
after waste has been deposited.
d) Leachate management and treatment

Leachate will contain potential pollutants since it has been in contact with waste. It gives an
offensive odour. Hence the required capacity of Leachate Treatment Plant should be proposed.
e) Restoration, aftercare and environmental monitoring

The Proposed landfill site must have an environmental monitoring regime. To detect the leachate
quantity which escapes into the ground and pollutes the ground water table and to detect the gas
escapes from the landfill. The function of this sampling is to ensure that the containment liner is not
leaking.
 By avoiding parking full waste vehicles on site overnight
 By providing vacuum venting on leachate sumps and drains
 Direct recycling leachate from sumps to sub cover rein filtration in bioreactor landfills or to
sewer
 Providing close monitoring and maintenance of gas harvesting systems and flares; Avoiding
excessively clayey final cap material or other material prone to desiccation or settlement
cracking, or provide for a moist biologically active attenuation capacity in the vegetation
layer.
 Washout of vehicles and their substructure to reduce on road vehicle odour
 Avoidance of odour masking agents which merely reinforce noticeable odour occurrence.
11.5 Landfill Gas Management
Land fill gas is generated as a product of waste biodegradation. In land fill, Organic waste is broken
down by enzymes produced by bacteria in a manner. Considerable heat is generated by these
reactions with methane, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen sulphide and other gases as by
products. Methane and carbon dioxide are the principle gases produced with almost 50-50% share.
When methane is present in the air in concentrations between 5 to 15 %, it is explosive. Landfills
generate gases with a pressure sufficient enough to damage the final cover and largely have the
impact on vegetative cover. Also because only limited amount of oxygen are present in a land fill,
when methane concentration reach this critical level, there is a little danger that the land fill will
Page 130
explode. The quantity of gas generated from the landfill is estimated with the help of Landfill Gas
Emissions (Land GEM) model. The proposed gas collect ion and flaring system is shown in Figure.
For venting system number of vents required can be estimated by following formula,
Number of Vents Required, N = V / R
V = Volume of Gas Generated
R = Rate of Gas Release per Vent
Since landfill site at proposed facility is supported by compost plant gas generation is anticipated to
be very less. The principal components of landfill gas are Methane (CH4) and Carbon dioxide (CO2)
and USEPA has identified another 47 type of toxicants and carcinogens liberate from the landfill. For
landfill site at proposed facility a gas venting system with flaring arrangement is proposed.
Figure 11-1: Gas Flaring System
11.6 Water Pollution Control & Management
The wastewater generated from the proposed facility comprises of composting windrow, closed
landfill and operating landfill cell. The leachate generated from the process area shall be collected
into leachate collection sumps and conveyed to the effluent treatment plant. The total wastewater
generated from the proposed Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management facility is as follows:
Table 11-2: Waste water Generation Details in m3/day

Wastewater in
Sl. No Utility Remarks
m3/day
1 Domestic Wastewater 1
2 Leachate from Windrow of Compost 2 Will be reused on windrows and
Plant excess sent to evaporation pond
Total 3
Page 131
11.7 Leachate Management Plan

The main sources of leachate generation is from MSW laid on windrow platform and due to the
infiltration of rain water in to the land fill area contributes leachate from the proposed integrated
facility. Leachate generation from the compost plant will be maximum during the first week of
decomposition. It may range 20% of the quantity of waste on the windrow.
The leachate generation from the windrow platform is high. However to maintain the moisture on
the windrow it is required to sprinkle 110 liter water per ton of waste approximately. Hence a high
quantity of water is required to maintain the moisture on the windrow. It is proposed to meet the
required quantity of water by recirculation the leachate generated from the windrow.
During the monsoon season the windrow platforms will be covered with 100GSM Low Density
Polyethylene (LDPE) sheets. The leachate generating during this season will be sent to storage tank/
leachate holding tank.
The leachate from the caped landfill can be treated by Solar Evaporation pond. The leachate from
the operated landfill is also proposed to treat in solar evaporation pond. The domestic wastewater
generated would be conveyed to the solar evaporation pond. The Figure 11.2 shows the
management of wastewater/leachate and Figure 11.3 shows the sizes of the tanks.
Figure 11-2: Leachate Management Plan
Page 132
Figure 11-3: Sizes of the Tanks
11.8 Solar Evaporation Pond
Solar Evaporation can be effective for concentrating or removing salts, heavy metals and a variety of
hazardous materials from solution. It may be used to recover useful by-products from a solution, or
to concentrate liquid wastes prior to additional treatment and final disposal.
In Solar Evaporation Process, the leachate is concentrated when a portion of water, is vaporized,
leaving behind saline liquor that contains virtually all of the dissolved solids, or solute, from the
original feed. In this process the evaporation can also be done by using commercial evaporation
equipment.
11.9 Sludge Management
The sludge which settles at the bottom of solar evaporation pond need to be managed. The amount
sludge generated from the solar evaporation pond is around 0.3-0.5 tons/year. The sludge can also
be sent for composting and mixed into a homogenous state to fasten up the composting process.
The dried sludge can also be directly disposed in the Landfill.
11.10 Capping of Landfill
A final landfill cover is usually composed of several layers, each with a specific function. The surface
cover system must enhance surface drainage, minimise infiltration, support vegetation and control
the release of landfill gases. The landfill cover to be adopted will depend on the gas management
Page 133
system.
As recommended by the MoEF and CPHEEO the final cover system must consist of a vegetative layer
supported by a drainage layer over barrier layer and gas vent layer.
Liner System Design

A composite barrier has 1.5mm High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) geo-membrane or equivalent
overlying 90cm of soil (clay/amended soil) having permeability coefficient not greater than 1X10 -
7
cm/sec will be proposed.
Therefore for the landfill site composite liner of following specifications has been recommended.
 A 90cm thick compacted clay or GCL of permeability not greater than 1X10-7 cm/sec
 A HDPE geo-membrane liner of thickness 1.5mm
 A drainage layer of 15cm thick granular material of permeability not greater than 10-2 cm/sec.
Main components of composite liner are clay/amended soil layer and geo-membrane liner and
performance of landfill largely depends on this liner system. Thus it is incumbent to design the liner
system very accurately
Clay or Amended Soil Liner

The clay or GCL is the base layer of landfill, which holds the entire system of landfill. Hence Safety of
this layer is at most important in designing liner system. Generally it is recommended that clay
material with permeability not greater than 1X10-7cm/sec laid with proper in-situ compaction.
Geo-Membrane Liner
Geo-membranes are relatively thin sheets of flexible thermoplastic or thermopolymeric materials.
Because of their inherent impermeability, geomembranes are proposed as barrier layer in landfill
site. Even though geomembranes are highly impermeable, their safety against manufacturing,
installation, handling and other defects is essential criteria in designing liner system.
Density of Geo-membrane Liner – Puncture Protection

Geo-membranes may contain manufacturing defects like tears, improperly bonded seams and
pinholes and may get defects during installation and handling also. So there is a possibility of leakage
of leachate through these defects. However the presence of low permeability soil liner beneath a
defect in the geo-membrane reduces the leakage by limiting the flow rate through the defect. Flow
through the defects in geo-membrane is controlled by the size of the defect, the available air space
between the two liners into which leachate can flow, the hydraulic conductivity of the clay/amended
soil liner and hydraulic head of the leachate.
To ensure the performance of the landfill site after closure leakage through the geo-membrane
should be controlled from the above defects. In this case assessment of density of geomembrane i.e.
mass per unit area (minimum thickness is fixed as 1.5mm) is essential. As suggested by USEPA the
thickness of geomembrane against puncture is determined as per the design criteria.
Page 134
11.11 Management of Flora & Fauna
A few shrubs and under trees are going to be damaged on account of the establishment of the
integrated MSW disposal facility. All of them occur in the buffer zone as well as in other parts.
Hence, there are no chances of losing any valuable biodiversity. In order to consolidate the landfill,
the proponents want to restore the old landfills with trees and shrubs. There is no plan to introduce
new exotic species except those that have become naturalized. Preference will be given to tall and
evergreen native and local trees.
Planting stocks are readily available from the social Forest Department as well as from the local
private nurseries. All plants are locally adapted and the present site can support their growth with
suitable horticultural practices. Sufficient space, resources and man power for development and
maintenance are provided in the plan.
11.12 Control of Noise Pollution
The noise generating unit in the proposed Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility is
DG set etc. The noise drops to 50 dB (A) at a distance of 500 m from the project site. As the nearest
habitat is more than 0.5 km from the project site the impact on the general public will be minimal.
However all necessary precautionary measures like ear plugs to workers, regular maintenance of
noise generating equipment will be carried out to reduce the noise levels. The noise levels at the
boundary of the plant are 55 dB (A).
Noise Pollution Management

The existing noise pollution management measures are;
 Acoustic Enclosure for all the high noise level equipments
 All the design/installation precautions as specified by the manufacturers with respect to
noise control are strictly adhered to
 High noise generating sources are insulated adequately by providing suitable enclosures;
 Other than the regular maintenance of the various equipment, ear plugs are provided to the
personnel close to the noise generating units;
 All the openings like covers, partitions are designed properly.
11.13 Environmental Control during Composting Process
 All uncovered windrow areas will be provided with an impermeable base. Such a base will be
made of concrete or of compacted clay, 50 centimeters thick, having permeability less than
10-7 centimeters/second. The base will be provided with 2 % slope and will be encircled by
lined drains for collection of leachate. A treatment unit will be provided to ensure that the
wastewater is discharged after it meets all the regulatory standards
 On such days when waste cannot be accepted at the compost plant due to rains/plant
maintenance, the waste will be diverted to a land fill
 The process rejects will be removed from the compost plant on daily basis. The recyclables
will be diverted to recycling vendors. The non-recyclables should be sent to land fill.
Page 135
 Temporary storage of rejects will be done in a covered area.

 Temporary storage is done an open area for 1 or 2 days
 The height of the stock piled waste will not exceed 3 m
 The storage area will have a provision for odour control, litter control, fire control and bird
control.
11.14 Occupational Health Management
There will be routine observation in health as certain sufferings are likely to appear as result of
exposure by the workers during operations of various facilities.
11.14.1 Medical Check-up of Workers
All the employees shall be required to undergo a medical checkup before joining the facility.
Medical checkup will be conducted on regular basis and the health conditions will be monitored.
11.14.2 First Aid of Facilities
All the first aid facilities required to attend immediately for meeting emergency situations shall be
made available at the facility.
11.15 Fire Protection System
The fire protection system will protect the entire site area from fire hazards happening accidentally.
11.15.1 Hydrant Systems
This system comprises of a ground level water storage tank to store the anticipated requirement of
water. Two electric motor driven pumps and two diesel high pressure pumps will be provided to
pump the water to a high pressure header from where the water is distributed to various high
pressure hydrants provided at selected locations.
Necessary fire hoses terminated with spouts will be kept ready at each hydrant location to facilitate
fire-fighting. The header also caters to a multi fire system to automatically sprinkle water through
sprinklers provided.
11.16 Green Belt Development
The proposed Integrated Municipal Solid Waste management facility will allocated area for green
belt. The green belt is well developed and helps to capture the emissions, attenuate the noise
generated and improve the aesthetics.
Attempts are always being made to ensure that all open spaces, where tree plantation may not
possible, will be covered with shrubs and grass to prevent erosion of topsoil. Adequate attention is
Page 136
being paid to maintenance and protection of green belt. Apart from green belt all around the site, on
the top of closed/capped landfills greenery would be developed.
11.17 Environmental Management Cell
An efficient environmental management cell exists at Integrated Municipal Solid waste Management
Facility. The Environmental Cell is headed by the Project Manager followed by other officers and
technicians. The department is the nodal agency to co-ordinate and provides necessary services on
environmental issues during operation of the project. This environmental group is responsible for
implementation of environmental management plan, interaction with the environmental regulatory
agencies, reviewing draft policy and planning. This department interacts with Andhra Pradesh State
Pollution Control Board (APPCB) and other environment regulatory agencies. The department also
interacts with local people to understand their problems and to formulate appropriate community
development plan.
Project In-Charge
Environment & Health

Fire & Safety
Leachate Treatment Security Persons

Plant Supervisor
Workers
Figure 11-4: Organization Chart
Page 137
Feedback Representative with Ieeja Municipality officials
N
W E
N
SW SE
NE
W
N
SE
SW
N
E
NW
SW SE
NE
NW
SE
SW
W
N
N
E
SW SE
NE
W
N
SE
SW
·
·
·
NE
W
N
SE
SW
NE
W
N
SE
SW
NE
W
N
SE
SW
NE
W
N
SE
SW
N
W E
N
SW SE
NE
W
N
SE
SW
NE
W
N
SE
SW
Project : Detailed Project Reports (DPR), Implementation of
Municipal Solid Waste Management Projects.
Client : Commissioner & Director of Municipal Administration
(CDMA)
Design Consultant : Feed Back Infra, 15th Floor, Tower 9B, DLF Cyber City,
Phase-III, Gurugram 122 002, Haryana.
Detailed Estimation for Vehicle Work Shop (21.23 x 10.23 m) - PEB
Sl. No Description of Item Units Qty Rate Amount Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Earthwork in excavation for structures as per cum 133.10 97.40 12,964.35
drawing and technical specifications Clause
305.1 including setting out, construction of
shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and
other deleterious material and disposal up to
a lead of 50 m, dressing of sides and bottom
and backfilling in trenches with excavated
suitable material as per Technical
Specification 305 MORD / 304 MORTH
Ordinary soil, Mechanical Means - Up to 3 m
depth
2 Providing Antitermite treatment as per IS 6315 sqm 371.34 296.80 110,213.42

(Part - 2) 2001 (Pre-constructional chemical
treatment measures) along the internal &
external vertical faces of the columns, plinth
beams, basement and top surface of the
basement filling below flooring bed as per the
specified procedure conforming to IS 6315
(Part-2) 2001 and other relevant approved
specification duly using Chlorpyriphos/
Lindane emulsifiable concentrate 20% with 1%
concentration @ 7.5 Liters/ sqm of the vertical
surface & @ 5.0 Liters/ sqm of the horizontal
surface of the substructure to a depth of 500
mm around columns & 300 mm deep around
plinth beams, basements & floor filling area
including excavation channel along the wall
& rodding etc. & cost & conveyance of all
materials to the site, cost of labour for
spraying, rodding etc. complete for finished
item of work as per the approval of the
Engineer-in-Charge
3 Plain Cement concrete (1:4:8) using 40 mm cum 41.81 4,295.30 179,581.57

metal with concrete mixture. All work up to
plinth level.
4 Construction of Coursed Rubble Masonry with cum 32.29 4,189.00 135,260.34
hard stone in foundation, plinth & super
structure up to +2.10m level including cost of
all materials, seigniorage charges, labour and
all operations for constructing masonry,
mixing cement mortar, curing etc., complete
for finished item of work.
CRS Masonry in CM (1:6)
Abstract_Vehicle Workshop Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5 Filling with sand in trenches, sides of cum 63.00 1,085.90 68,411.70
foundations and basement with initial lead in
layers not exceeding 15 cm thick,
consolidating each deposited layer by
watering and ramming including cost and
conveyance of water to work site and all
operational, incidental, labour charges, hire
charges of T & P etc., complete for finished
item of work.
6 Supply and placing of the Ready Mix (RMC) -
Standard Design Mix Concrete grade M25 as
per IS 4926-2003 with minimum cement
content as per IS code 456-2000 using 20 mm
graded metal, from standard suppliers
approved by the department including
pumping, laying concrete, vibrating, curing
etc. complete but excluding cots of steel and
its fabrication charges, cantering, shuttering
a) Foundations, Plinth, Pedestals (Below Plinth) cum 18.21 5,692.20 103,654.86
b) Columns, Lintels, RCC Walls / Water Tanks In cum 1.46 7,098.80 10,361.26
Buildings
c) RCC Slabs, Beams cum - 5,059.00 -
7 Supply and placing of the Ready Mix (SFRC) cum 35.70 8,965.50 320,068.35
Standard Design Mix Concrete grade as per IS
4926-2003 with minimum cement content as
per IS code 456-2000 using 20 mm graded
metal, from standard suppliers approved by
the department including pumping, laying
concrete, vibrating, curing etc. complete but
excluding cots of steel and its fabrication
charges, cantering, shuttering for finished item
of work.
8 Construction of granular sub-base by cum 21.00 1,566.50 32,896.50

providing well graded / Close Graded
material, mixing in a mechanical mix plant at
OMC, carriage of mixed material to work site
up to lead of 1000 m spreading in uniform
layers with motor grader on prepared surface
and compacting with smooth wheel roller 80-
100 kN to achieve the desired density,
complete as per Technical Specification
Clause 401
9 Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar kg 2,219.35 55.10 122,286.35

reinforcement in foundation complete as per
drawings and technical specifications for Bars
below 36 mm dia including over laps and
wastage, where they are not welded
10 Hire charges for Centering & Scaffolding - -

Unsupported Height up to 3.66 M Steel
scaffolding pipes, jack Props, walkers, Foot
plates, brackets, steel Cantering Plates, etc.,
a) Footings cum 16.26 1,070.30 17,407.23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
b) Pedestals cum 1.95 1,558.00 3,032.03
c) Plinth Beams cum 8.07 3,336.10 26,930.17
d) Columns cum 1.46 3,098.60 4,522.65
11 23 cm wide Brick masonry for below & above cum 16.84 5,077.20 85,479.74
plinth, super-structure on ground floor in cm
(1:6) using second class traditional size bricks
including cost of all materials, seigniorage
charges, labour and all operations for
constructing brick masonry, mixing cement
mortar, curing etc., complete for finished item
of work.
Brick Masonry in CM (1:6) with 2nd class Bricks
traditional size 23 x 11 x 7 cms
12 Plastering -
a) Providing cement plaster 15 mm thick for 10 sqm 93.96 2,173.50 20,422.21
internal a single coat in cement mortar 1:4
without neeru finish to concrete or brick
surfaces, in all positions including scaffolding
and curing complete.
b) Providing external cement plaster 20 mm thick 10 sqm 72.01 3,794.00 27,320.37
in 2 coats with cement mortar base coat in
CM (1:6), 16 mm thick and top coat in CM
(1:4), 4 mm thick with Debora sponge finishing
to concrete or brick surfaces, in all positions
including scaffolding and curing complete.
13 Filling with useful available excavated earth cum 71.11 272.60 19,385.80
(excluding rock) in trenches, sides of
item of work. (APSS NO. 309 & 310)
Earth filling (ordinary soil) Available soil
14 Removal of unsuitable / Unserviceable soil cum 61.99 78.70 4,878.59

including excavation, loading and disposal
up to 1000 m lead but excluding compaction
ground supporting embankment subgrade
replacement by suitable soil, which shall be
paid separately as per Clause 303.5.2 as per
Technical Specification Clause 302.3.11 MORD
/ 301 MORTH
15 Painting For Walls -

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
a) Painting to new walls with 2 coats of ready 10 sqm 93.96 1,181.90 11,105.13
mixed oil bound washable distemper of
approved brand and shade over a base coat
of appropriate primer of approved brand,
making 3 coats in all to give an even shade
after thoroughly brushing the surface to
remove all dirt and remains of loose
powdered materials, including cost and
conveyance of all materials to work site and
all operational, incidental, labour charges etc.
complete for finished item of work as per SS
911 for internal walls
b) Painting to new walls with 2 coats of water 10 sqm 72.01 1,152.70 8,300.52
proof cement paint of approved brand and
shade over a base coat of approved cement
primer grade I making 3 coats in all to give
an even shade after thoroughly brushing the
surface to remove all dirt and remains of loose
16 PEB : sqm 262.50 4,887.50 1,282,968.75

Fabrication, Supply and Installation of Steel
Structures for sheds including all materials,
labour, hire charges of machinery, two coats
of epoxy paint over one coat of approved
steel primer, etc., complete for finished item
of work .
17 Base Plat and Anchor Bolts Labour Charges nos 10.30 1,250.00 12,871.06

Total area in sqm : 217.18
Per sqm cost in INR : 12,065.05

(CDMA)
Abstract Estimation for Presorting/RDF/Compost Plant (50.00 x 25.00 m) - PEB
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
depth
2 Providing Antitermite treatment as per IS 6315 sqm 1,762.07 296.80 522,982.38

Engineer-in-Charge

plinth level.
plinth level.
Abstract_Compost Plant Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Clause 401

7 Earth filling (ordinary soil) Barrowed soil: cum 375.00 593.10 222,412.50
Filling with approved material obtained from
borrow pits (excluding rock) in trenches, sides
of foundations and basement with initial lead
in layers not exceeding 15 cm thick,
item of work.

Buildings
9 Supply and placing of the Ready Mix (SFRC) cum 212.50 8,965.50 1,905,168.75
of work.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

a) Footings cum 31.59 1,070.30 33,810.78

b) Pedestals cum 3.78 1,558.00 5,889.24
d) Columns cum 2.84 3,098.60 8,784.53
of work.
13 Plastering -
a) Providing cement plaster 15 mm thick for 10 240.00 2,173.50 52,164.00
internal a single coat in cement mortar 1:4 sqm
b) Providing external cement plaster 20 mm thick 10 143.00 3,794.00 54,254.20
in 2 coats with cement mortar base coat in sqm

/ 301 MORTH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
a) Painting to new walls with 2 coats of ready 10 240.00 1,181.90 28,365.60
mixed oil bound washable distemper of sqm
b) Painting to new walls with 2 coats of water 10 143.00 1,152.70 16,483.61

proof cement paint of approved brand and sqm
17 PEB : sqm 500.00 4,887.50 2,443,750.00

of work .

Total area in sqm : 1,250.00

(CDMA)
Abstract Estimate for Detailed Estimation for Electrical Panel Room
(6.23 x 5.23 m) and DG Platform (5.00 x 6.00 m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
depth

Engineer-in-Charge

plinth level.
plinth level.
Abstract_DG Room Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

item of work.
Buildings
c) RCC Slabs, Beams cum 9.60 5,059.00 48,581.03

a) Footings cum 6.32 1,070.30 6,762.16

b) Pedestals cum 0.76 1,558.00 1,177.85
d) Lintels cum 0.37 3,218.80 1,199.32
e) Chajjas - Sunshades sqm 7.74 551.40 4,267.84
f) Columns cum 2.53 3,098.60 7,830.78
g) Beams cum 2.03 4,548.30 9,230.77
h) Slabs - Up To 150 mm thk. sqm 66.93 516.40 34,563.89

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
of work.
11 11.5 cm wide Brick masonry for super-structure sqm 19.18 648.20 12,429.36
on ground floor in cm (1:3) using second class
traditional size bricks including cost of all
materials, seigniorage charges, labour and all
operations for constructing half brick masonry,
for finished item of work, but excluding
conveyance charges of materials.
12 Plastering -
c) Providing cement plaster 12 mm thick in a 10 sqm 74.67 1,389.50 10,375.73

single coat in cement mortar 1:4 without
neeru finish to concrete or brick surfaces, in all
positions including scaffolding and
curing complete.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
/ 301 MORTH
15 Flooring with vitrified tiles of 1st quality, set over 10 sqm 32.45 11,062.40 35,897.49
base coat of cement mortar (1:8), 12 mm
thick over CC bed already laid or RCC roof
slab, including neat cement slurry of honey
like consistency spread @ 3.3.kgs per sqm &
jointed neatly with white cement paste to full
depth mixed with pigment of matching
shade, including cost of all materials like
cement, sand water and tiles etc., complete,
including seigniorage charges, etc., complete
for finished item of work, but excluding the
cost of conveyance of all materials.
16 Providing impervious coat to exposed RCC 10 sqm 63.11 4,227.60 26,681.06

roof slab surface with CM(1:3), 20mm thick
with 1kg of water proof compound per bag of
cement laid over roof when it is green
charges, excluding conveyance charges of
materials and including all operational,
incidental and labour charges for mixing
mortar, laying, rendering smooth and thread
lining, curing, rounding off junctions of wall
and slab etc.,, complete for finished item of
work


1 2 3 4 5 6 7
c) White washing two coats with lime of 10 sqm 74.67 276.80 2,066.93
approved quality to give an even shade after
thoroughly brushing the surface to remove all
dirt and remains of loose powdered materials
including cost of all materials, labour charges
and incidental such as scaffolding, lift charges
etc., complete for finished item of work, but
excluding conveyance charges of materials
18 Supply and Fixing of Aluminium Doors sqm 5.76 6,597.00 37,998.72

19 Supply and Fixing of Aluminium Windows sqm 3.60 6,597.00 23,749.20
20 Supply and Fixing of Aluminium Ventilators sqm 1.35 6,597.00 8,905.95
21 Supply and Fixing of PVC 110mm dia Rain rmt 4.50 650.80 2,928.60
Water Pipe
Grand Total Amount in INR : 933,536.30


(CDMA)
Design Consultant : Feed Back Infra, 15th Floor, Tower 9B, DLF Cyber City, Phase-
III, Gurugram 122 002, Haryana.
Abstract Estimate for Leachate Collection Pond - 25.00 x 15.00 m
Sl. No Description of Item Units Qty Rate Amount Amount
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
depth
2 Construction of embankment with approved cum 208.00 485.60 101,004.80

material obtained from borrow pits with all
lifts, transporting to site, spreading, grading to
required slope and compacting to meet
requirement of Tables 300.1 and 300.2 with a
lead upto 1000 m as per Technical
Specification Clause 301.5 MORD / 305
MORTH
3 Clay - Supply and laying of cum 121.79 451.50 54,988.29
bentonite/compacted clay having
permeability less than 1 x 10-7 cm/ sec on
dumping ground in 20cm thick layer with
approved material, laying in layer breaking
clods and mixing of water and dressing to the
required lines curves, grade and section,
watering and compacting to 100% standard
proctor density with roller etc.
4 HDPE Liner - Providing of 1.5 mm thick HDPE sqm 419.58 304.80 127,888.13
sheet for bed and sides of Secured Land Fill
including cost of all materials, including
transportation, loading and unloading etc.,
complete with all leads and lifts. Using 1.5mm
thick HDPE sheet.
5 Furnishing and laying of the live sods of sqm 339.88 55.90 18,999.42
perennial turf forming grass on embankment
slope, verges or other locations shown on the
drawing or as directed by the Engineer
including preparation of ground, fetching of
sods and watering as per Technical
Specification Clause 309 MORD / 307 MORTH.
6 Surface Drain rmt 76.00 1,500.00 114,000.00

7 Leachate Collection sump nos 1.00 100,000.00 100,000.00

Abstract_LC Pond Page 1 of 1

(CDMA)
Abstract Estimation for Recyclables Storage Shed (10.00 x 10.00 m) - PEB
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
depth

Engineer-in-Charge

plinth level.
Abstract_Storage Shed Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
item of work.
Buildings
7 Supply and placing of the Ready Mix (SFRC) cum 17.00 8,965.50 152,413.50
of work.

Clause 401


a) Footings cum 12.17 1,070.30 13,023.41

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
b) Pedestals cum 1.46 1,558.00 2,268.45
d) Columns cum 1.09 3,098.60 3,383.67
of work.
12 Plastering -

/ 301 MORTH
14 Disposal of Earth cum 37.45 78.70 2,947.63


1 2 3 4 5 6 7
16 PEB : sqm 125.44 4,887.50 613,088.00

of work .


(CDMA)
Abstract Estimate for BT Road - 7.00 m Wide
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Base preparation: sqm 2,340.00 10.00 23,400.00
Preparation and consolidation of sub-grade
with power road roller of 8 to 12 tonne
capacity after excavating earth to an
average of 22.5 cm. depth, dressing to
camber and consolidating with road roller
including making good the undulations etc.
and re-rolling the sub-grade and disposal of
surplus earth within a lead up to 50 meters
including cost of construction as per standard
specs. and directions, labour & hire charges
of machinery, testing charges and all other
incidental charges contingent to work etc.
complete for the finished item of work.
2 Construction of embankment with approved cum 468.00 485.60 227,260.80

material obtained from borrow pits with all
lifts, transporting to site, spreading, grading to
required slope and compacting to meet
requirement of Tables 300.1 and 300.2 with a
lead upto 1000 m as per Technical
Specification Clause 301.5 MORD / 305
MORTH
3 Providing, laying, spreading and compacting cum 273.00 1,725.80 471,143.40
stone aggregates of specific sizes to water
bound macadam specification including
spreading in uniform thickness, hand packing,
rolling with three wheel 80 -100 kN static roller
in stages to proper grade and camber,
applying and brooming, stone
screening/binding materials to fill-up the
interstices of coarse aggregate, watering and
compacting to the required density Grading
1 as per Technical Specification Clause 404
MORTH & 405 MORD. For compacted
thickness of 100 mm.
Abstract_Road - 7.0 m Wide Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4 Dense bituminous macadam (50mm thick): sqm 1,820.00 325.00 591,500.00
Providing and laying dense graded
bituminous macadam with 100 - 120 TPH
batch type HMP producing an average
output of 75 tonne per hour using crushed
aggregates of specified grading, premixed
with bituminous binder @ 4.0 to 4.5 per cent
by weight of total mix and filler, transporting
the hot mix to work site, laying with a
hydrostatic paver finisher with sensor control
to the required grade, level and alignment,
rolling with smooth wheeled, vibratory and
tandem rollers to achieve the desired
compaction as per MoRT&H Specifications
Clause 507 complete in all respects.
5 Semi dense bituminous concrete (40mm sqm 1,820.00 475.00 864,500.00

thick):
Providing and laying semi-dense bituminous
concrete with 100 - 120 TPH batch type HMP
producing an average output of 75 tonne per
hour using crushed aggregates of specified
grading, premixed with bituminous binder @
4.0 to 4.5 per cent of mix and filler,
transporting the hot mix to work site, laying
with a hydrostatic paver finisher with sensor
control to the required grade, level and
alignment, rolling with smooth wheeled,
vibratory and tendem rollers to achieve the
desired compaction as per MoRT&H
Specifications Clause 508 complete in all
respects.

Total area in sqm : 1,820.00
Abstract_Road - 7.0 m Wide Page 2 of 2

(CDMA)
Abstract for Scale Room (3.46 x 4.46 m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
depth

Engineer-in-Charge

plinth level.
plinth level.
Abstract_Scale Room Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5 Supply and placing of the Ready Mix (RMC) - -
Buildings
6 Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar kg 701.22 55.10 38,636.96
7 Hire charges for Centering & Scaffolding - - -

a) Footings cum 2.02 1,070.30 2,157.72

b) Pedestals cum 0.38 1,558.00 584.94
d) Lintels cum 0.30 3,218.80 966.12
e) Chajjas - Sunshades sqm 6.32 551.40 3,486.23
f) Columns cum 0.81 3,098.60 2,511.19
g) Beams cum 0.74 4,548.30 3,368.47
h) Slabs - Up To 150 mm thk. sqm 28.85 516.40 14,899.38
of work.
9 11.5 cm wide Brick masonry for super-structure sqm 6.19 648.20 4,013.65
on ground floor in cm (1:3) using second class
traditional size bricks including cost of all
materials, seigniorage charges, labour and all
operations for constructing half brick masonry,
for finished item of work, but excluding
conveyance charges of materials.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
11 Providing cement plaster 15 mm thick for 10 sqm 31.74 2,173.50 6,898.69

12 Providing external cement plaster 20 mm thick 10 sqm 62.29 3,794.00 23,634.27
13 Providing cement plaster 12 mm thick in a 10 sqm 40.39 1,389.50 5,612.87

single coat in cement mortar 1:4 without
neeru finish to concrete or brick surfaces, in all
positions including scaffolding and
curing complete.
14 Providing impervious coat to exposed RCC 10 sqm 26.38 4,227.60 11,150.55

roof slab surface with CM(1:3), 20mm thick
with 1kg of water proof compound per bag of
cement laid over roof when it is green
charges, excluding conveyance charges of
materials and including all operational,
incidental and labour charges for mixing
mortar, laying, rendering smooth and thread
lining, curing, rounding off junctions of wall
and slab etc.,, complete for finished item of
work
15 Painting to new walls with 2 coats of ready 10 sqm 31.74 1,181.90 3,751.35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
16 Painting to new walls with 2 coats of water 10 sqm 62.29 1,152.70 7,180.61
17 White washing two coats with lime of 10 sqm 40.39 276.80 1,118.13
18 Flooring with vitrified tiles of 1st quality, set over 10 sqm 15.28 11,062.40 16,906.67
base coat of cement mortar (1:8), 12 mm
thick over CC bed already laid or RCC roof
slab, including neat cement slurry of honey
like consistency spread @ 3.3.kgs per sqm &
jointed neatly with white cement paste to full
depth mixed with pigment of matching
shade, including cost of all materials like
cement, sand water and tiles etc., complete,
including seigniorage charges, etc., complete
for finished item of work, but excluding the
cost of conveyance of all materials.
19 Supply and Fixing of Aluminium Doors sqm 2.10 6,597.00 13,853.70

20 Supply and Fixing of Aluminium Windows sqm 6.48 6,597.00 42,748.56
21 Supply and Fixing of PVC 110mm dia Rain rmt 3.45 650.80 2,245.26
Water Pipe

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
23 Removal of unsuitable / Unserviceable soil cum 4.90 78.70 385.73
/ 301 MORTH


(CDMA)
Abstract Estimate for Drain
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
depth
2 Base preparation: sqm 813.93 10.00 8,139.29

Preparation and consolidation of sub-grade
with power road roller of 8 to 12 tonne
capacity after excavating earth to an
average of 22.5 cm. depth, dressing to
camber and consolidating with road roller
including making good the undulations etc.
and re-rolling the sub-grade and disposal of
surplus earth within a lead up to 50 meters
including cost of construction as per standard
specs. and directions, labour & hire charges of
machinery, testing charges and all other
incidental charges contingent to work etc.
complete for the finished item of work.

plinth level.
4 Supply and placing of the Ready Mix (RMC)

Abstract_Drain Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6 Hire charges for Centering & Scaffolding -
a) Slabs - Up To 150 mm thk. sqm 104.00 516.40 53,705.60

/ 301 MORTH

Total Length in rmt : 520.00
Per rmt cost in INR : 3,162.81
Abstract_Drain Page 2 of 2
(CDMA)
Abstract Estimate for Under Ground Sump - 3.00 x 3.00 x 2.80 + 0.30 m FB
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
depth

Engineer-in-Charge

plinth level.
Abstract_Under Ground Sump Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Buildings

a) Footings cum 4.56 1,070.30 4,883.78

b) Plinth Beams cum 5.86 3,336.10 19,546.21
c) Slabs - Up To 150 mm thk. sqm 12.87 516.40 6,646.07

/ 301 MORTH
9 Water proof Plastering 10 sqm 73.92 1,780.50 13,161.46
10 PVC Water Stopper rmt 37.80 639.00 24,154.20

11 Supply and fixing of Manhole cover 450 dia nos 1.00 2,500.00 2,500.00
12 PVC Foot Rest nos 17.00 350.00 5,950.00

Total vol. in ltr : 27,900.00
Per ltr cost in INR : 9.00
Abstract_Under Ground Sump Page 2 of 2

(CDMA)
Abstract Estimate for Vehicle Wheel Wash (16.00 x 4.00 m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
depth

Engineer-in-Charge

plinth level.
Abstract_Vehicle Whell Wash Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Buildings

a) Footings cum 18.42 1,070.30 19,716.53

b) Pedestals cum 5.40 1,558.00 8,413.20

/ 301 MORTH

Abstract_Vehicle Whell Wash Page 2 of 2

(CDMA)
Abstract Estimate for Weigh Bridge Platform (18.00 x 3.00 m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
depth

Engineer-in-Charge

plinth level.
Abstract_Weigh Bridge Platform Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Buildings

a) Footings cum 8.10 1,070.30 8,669.43

b) Pedestals cum 5.40 1,558.00 8,413.20
of work.
8 Plastering -
a) Providing external cement plaster 20 mm thick 10 sqm 30.51 3,794.00 11,573.79
9 Supplying, fitting and placing of structural kg 34.26 78.90 2,703.11

steel angle / channel / beam / bars complete
as per drawings and technical specifications
including over laps and wastage, welding,.
Etc. complete.
10 Backfilling -
a) Filling with useful available excavated earth cum 34.36 272.60 9,367.23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
b) Earth filling (ordinary soil) Barrowed soil: cum 6.55 593.10 3,882.32
Filling with approved material obtained from
borrow pits (excluding rock) in trenches, sides
of foundations and basement with initial lead
in layers not exceeding 15 cm thick,
item of work.


(CDMA)
Abstract Estimate for Boundary Wall - 2948.00 m Length
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
depth

Engineer-in-Charge

plinth level.
Abstract_Boundary Wall Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5 23 cm wide Brick masonry for below & above cum 309.35 5,077.20 1,570,613.85
of work.
plinth level.
7 Providing external cement plaster 20 mm thick 10 sqm 2,762.86 3,794.00 1,048,227.28
8 White washing two coats with lime of 10 sqm 2,762.86 276.80 76,475.83
9 Supplying, fitting and placing of structural kg 2,275.89 78.90 179,567.79

steel angle / channel / beam / bars complete
as per drawings and technical specifications
including over laps and wastage, welding,.
Etc. complete.
10 2 Ply 4 Spikes 12 Gauge Barbed Wire 6 rows kg 510.08 80.50 41,061.04

/ 301 MORTH

Total Length in rmt : 680.10
Per rmt cost in INR : 5,711.18
Abstract_Boundary Wall Page 2 of 2

EQUIPMENT SOLUTION FOR ALL YOUR RECYCLING CHALLENGES
PROCESS PRODUCTS INDUSTRY

SHREDDING DUAL SHAFT SHREDDER MUNCIPAL SOLID WASTE
SINGLE SHAFT SHREDDER WOOD
SINGLE ROTOR CHOPPER PLASTIC
METAL
SCREENING TROMMEL SCREEN
FOOD WASTE
VIBRATING SCREEN DUAL SHAFT SHREDDER
E-WASTE
DISC SCREEN
CABLE RECYCLING
OCC SCREEN
RUBBERS
FINGER SCREEN
TEXTILE
GRINDING HAMMER MILL
CARDBOARDS
GRANULATOR
PAPERS
MICRO PULVERIZER
MINING
SEPARATING OVER BAND MAGNET C&D
SUSPENSION MAGNET AUTOMOBILE
SINGLE SHAFT SHREDDER
EDDY CURRENT SEPARATOR FURNITURE
DENSITY SEPARATOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE
AIR CLASSIFIER CHEMICALS & MORE
CONVEYING BELT CONVEYOR
SCREW CONVEYOR
PNEUMATIC CONVEYOR
BUCKET ELEVATOR
VIBRATING CONVEYOR
CHIPPING DISC CHIPPER
DISC SCREEN
DRUM CHIPPER
TROMMEL SCREEN
DISC CHIPPER GRINDER
PELLETING VERTICAL PELLET MILL
HORIZONTAL PELLET MILL
MIXING RIBBON MIXER

PADDLE MIXER
CONE MIXER
PAN MIXER
OTHERS INDUSTRIAL VACUUM SYSTEM
DUST COLLECTOR
STORAGE SYSTEM HAMMER MILL DISC CHIPPER
ECOSTER RECYCLING SYSTEMS

#3/142, Sathya Nagar, Ramapuram Road,
Manapakkam, Chennai - 600089
Tamil Nadu, INDIA.
Ph - 91 44 22492927, 91 95660 03925
Email - info@ecostermfg.com, URL - www.ecostermfg.com
obm SEPARATOR GRAIN VAC
3/142, Sathya Nagar,
Ramapuram Road, Manapakkam
Chennai, Tamilnadu 600089
9566003925
info@ecostermfg.com
www.ecostermfg.com
GSTIN: 33ALBPV3082F1Z7
ESTIMATE
ADDRESS ESTIMATE NO. ERS/EST/17-18/1076
DATE 14/09/2017
Commissioner & Directorate of EXPIRATION DATE 14/10/2017
Municipal Administration
(CDMA)
Hyderabad
Telangana.
State Code: 36
NO HSN/SAC ACTIVITY QTY RATE TAX AMOUNT
1 ERS-TS 600 Tormmel Screen 1 6,80,000.00 18.0% IGST 6,80,000.00

Power 3 HP/3 Phase, Drum Dia
- 600mm, Drum Length -
3000mm, RPM - 15 RPM, Screen
Holes - 4 mm, Type - Shaft
Less, Conveyors - 3 No
with 3000mm Length x 600mm
Width ( Infeed, Fine Output
& Oversize Output) , Control
Panel Included for all
systems, Application - RDF
Line,
MOC - MS , Capacity - 1
Ton/hour ( Processing )
2 ERS - TS 1200 Trommel Screen 1 7,80,000.00 18.0% IGST 7,80,000.00
Power 5 HP/3 Phase, Drum Dia
- 1000mm, Drum Length -
Less, Conveyors - 3 No with
3000mm Length x 600mm Width
( Infeed, Fine Output &
Oversize Output) , Control
Line,MOC - MS , Capacity - 2
to 3 Tons/hour (
Processing )
3 ERS- TS 1500 Trommel Screen 1 10,00,000.00 18.0% IGST 10,00,000.00

Power 7.5 HP/3 Phase, Drum
Dia - 1400mm, Drum Length -
Less, Conveyors - 3 No with
5000mm Length x 800mm Width
( Infeed, Fine Output &
Oversize Output) , Control
Line,MOC - MS , Capacity -4
to 5 Tons/hour (
Processing )
Total price are Inclusive of GST 18% SUBTOTAL 24,60,000.00

Transportation, Insurance Extra IGST @ 18% on 2460000.00 4,42,800.00
Installation & Commissioning Extra TOTAL
Payment: 50% advance on PO and balance against
Rs29,02,800.
Proforma invoice before dispatch. 00
The material can be inspected prior to dispatch at
our works at your cost.
Delivery within 6 to 8 weeks.
Limited 12 months warranty on any manufacturing
defects…
Valid for 30 days
Please note that no other terms & conditions would
be deemed to have been accepted by us unless
otherwise specially confirmed in writing.
The above mentioned capacity are dependent on the
raw material condition used as input and the
manpower used to operate the Machine.
Order Cancellation In case of cancellation of order
by the buyer, the advance payment shall be imposed.
Subject to Chennai Jurisdiction
Accepted By Accepted Date

3/142, Sathya Nagar,
Ramapuram Road, Manapakkam
Chennai, Tamilnadu 600089
9566003925
info@ecostermfg.com
www.ecostermfg.com
GSTIN: 33ALBPV3082F1Z7
ESTIMATE
ADDRESS ESTIMATE NO. ERS/EST/17-18/1077
DATE 14/09/2017
Commissioner & Directorate of EXPIRATION DATE 14/10/2017
Municipal Administration
(CDMA)
Hyderabad
Telangana
State Code: 36
1 ERS-DSS 300 Dual Shaft 1 2,80,000.00 18.0% IGST 2,80,000.00

Shredder
Power - 10HP/3 Phase, Size -
400mm x 300mm, Cutter Dia -
200mm, Cutter Thickness -
20mm, Shaft - HEX, Cutter &
Shaft - Alloy Steel,
Application - RDF, Capacity
- 500 Kgs/hour, MOC - MS,
Control Panel - Included,
Type - Dual Shaft
Shredder
- 1 Tons /hour, MOC - MS,
Control Panel - Included,
Type - Dual Shaft
Shredder
- 2 to 3 Tons /hour, MOC -
MS, Control Panel -
Included. Type - Dual Shaft

Shredder
- 5 Tons /hour, MOC - MS,
Control Panel -
Included.Type - Dual Shaft
Total price are inclusive of GST 18% SUBTOTAL 25,60,000.00

Transportation, Insurance Extra IGST @ 18% on 2560000.00 4,60,800.00
Installation & Commissioning Extra TOTAL
Payment: 50% advance on PO and balance against
Rs30,20,800.
Proforma invoice before dispatch. 00
The material can be inspected prior to dispatch at
our works at your cost.
Delivery within 6 to 8 weeks.
Limited 12 months warranty on any manufacturing
defects…
Valid for 30 days
Please note that no other terms & conditions would
be deemed to have been accepted by us unless
otherwise specially confirmed in writing.
The above mentioned capacity are dependent on the
raw material condition used as input and the
manpower used to operate the Machine.
Order Cancellation In case of cancellation of order
by the buyer, the advance payment shall be imposed.
Subject to Chennai Jurisdiction
Accepted By Accepted Date

A
GROUP COMPANY
OF
HYQUIP
HSL: MSW: CDMATEL:17-18/040
Dated: 11/09/2017
CDMA
Telangana.
Kind Attn.: Mr. G.Santosh
Dear Sir,
Sub: Offer for Design, Engineering, Manufacture, Supply, Erection & Commissioning of 80-100 &
40-55TPD Composting Plant and Machinery.
Ref: Your mail dated 08.09.2017
Hyquip was established in the year 1984 to offer solutions to core sectors; cement, steel, power,
sugar, paper.... for handling of dry bulk solids.
Hyquip diversified into MSW processing technologies in the year 2002 and through continuous
refinement of its products, evolved into one of the most reliable system supplier in the market for
processing of municipal solid waste.
We can also offer a customized Data Management System to remotely monitor the plant
operation plus Annual Maintenance Contracts (AMC).
Hyquip developed import substitutes like €Shredder, RDF dryer and Air Density Separator with a sole
objective of making MSW processing financially sustainable.
Please find the detailed techno-commercial offer as per the Annexure given below:
1.0 Basis of Design
2.0 Purchaser•s Obligations
3.0 80-100 TPD MSW Composting Plant Machinery
3.1 Scope of Supply
3.2 Technical Specifications
4.0 40-55 TPD MSW Composting Plant Machinery
4.1 Scope of Supply
4.2 Technical Specifications
5.0 Price Schedule
6.0 Commercial Terms and Conditions
We hope you will find our offer in line with your requirement and look forward to the opportunity to
partner in your project.
Best Regards,
M. Vamsi Mohan
Head – Technical Services
MSW Division
Offer No.: HSL: MSW: CDMATEL: 17-18/040
Client: CDMA, Telangana
1.0 DESIGN BASIS
1.1 Design Criteria:
i) The Compost Plant is designed based on 12 working hours per day.
ii) The mixed municipal solid waste should be devoid of street sweepings, silt from drainage and
construction debris which shall be detrimental to the safety of the plant and machinery.
iii) The windrow area is envisaged to be under covered shed as otherwise it will be difficult to
operate the plant during monsoon season.
1.2 Additional Design Features:
i) The power consumption of the system offered by us shall be about 12-15% lower compared to
the conventional drives offered by our competitors.
ii) An optional data management system can be integrated into the plant operation wherein the
following data can be retrieved.
Total incoming waste procured ____ tons/day
Quantity of non-Biodegradable waste ____ tons/day
Quantity of Biodegradable waste ____ tons/day
Quantity of Compost produced ____ /day

Quantity of RDF produced ____ /day
Quantity of inerts sent to the landfill area ____ tons/day

Moisture content in the RDF ____ %
Moisture content in the Compost ____ %
Page - 2 -of 59
2.0 PURCHASER€S OBLIGATIONS
2.1 All civil works shall be carried out by the purchaser.
2.2 Drinking water facility shall be provided to the erection crew.
2.3 Power shall be provided free of cost to carry out erection and commissioning.
2.4 Electrical connection from MCC to the local control stations (provided by us) shall be
carried out by the purchaser.
2.5 Lighting shall be provided during erection and commissioning.
2.6 Security shall be provided for safe guarding the equipment during the period of erection
and commissioning.
2.7 Fire detection, alarm and fire fighting facility including hand appliances.
2.8 All mobile equipments shall be in client•s scope.
2.9 Lubricants like Hydraulic Oil, Gear Oil and Grease shall be in client•s scope.
Page - 3 -of 59
3.0. 80-100 TPD MSW COMPOST PLANT MACHINERY
3.1 SCOPE OF SUPPLY
3.1.1 Presorting Section (System Capacity: 10-12.5 TPH)
1. €Z• Pit Feed Conveyor. (1.0M x 12M) : 01 No
2. Trommel (Ø 2.0M x 6.0M, 100 mm) : 01 No
3. €L• Conveyor – Overs (1.0M x 9.0M) : 01 No
4. €L• Conveyor – Unders (1.0M x 11.0M for -100mm) : 01 No
5. Sorting Conveyor (1.0M x 12.0M) : 01 No
6. Hydraulic Power Pack with air cooling system (25 HP) : 01 No
7. Electrical Control Panel : 01 No
8. Over Band Magnetic Separator : 01 No
3.1.2 Preparatory Section (System Capacity: 10 TPH)
1. €Z• Feed Conveyor (0.8M x 8.5M) :01 No
2 Trommel (Ø 2.0M x 6.0 M, 25mm) :01 No
3. Conveyor - Overs (0.8M x 9.0M) :01 No
4. €L• Conveyor – Unders (0.8M x 11M) :01 No
5. Hydraulic Power Pack with air cooling system (20HP) :01 No
3.1.3 Refinement Section (System Capacity: 5 TPH)
1. €Z• Feed Conveyor (1.0M x 8.5M) : 01 No
2. Rotary Screen (Ø 1.8M x 5.6M, 4 mm opening ) : 01 No
4. €L• Conveyor – Unders (1.0M x 15.5M) : 01 No
5. De-stoner (9.0 HP) : 01 No
Page - 4 -of 59
6. €L• De-stoner Rejects Conveyor (0.6M x 9.0M) : 01 No
7. Dust Extraction System (5 HP) : 01 No
3.1.4 Shredder & Baler ( Capacity: 6 TPH)
1. Shredder (100 HP) : 01 No
2. Baler (50 HP) : 01 No
Page - 5 -of 59
3.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
3.2.1 Presorting Section (System Capacity: 10-12.5 TPH)
1)
Name of the equipment €Z• Pit Feed Conveyor
Profile Horizontal - Inclined - Horizontal
Length of conveyor C/C 12 M
Inclination 28 Deg
Material to be handled Mixed MSW
Belt specification 1000 mm x 315/3, 3mm Top, 1.5mm Bottom Cover, M

24-Nylon/Nylon.
Skirt Rubber 200 x 6 mm Thk. Fitted all along the length of the
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Type of chain A2 Attachment bush roller
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Material EN19/C-45/ 20 Mn Cr 5
Conveyor Sprockets
Teeth Flame Hardened
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Bearings Self aligning ball bearings
MOC of Drive/Driven shaft EN8
Side Wall
Length On both sides at inclined portion
Height 600mm
Thickness 3.15 mm MS confirming to IS 1079
Supporting structure Fabricated from suitable MS Channels & Angles
Page - 6 -of 59
confirming to IS 2062
Take-up Screw take – up
Drive
Motor Hydraulic. Radial piston type
Gear box Worm Reducer (Elecon/Shanti)
Coupling Chain Coupling
Painting Specifications One coat of Epoxy Primer and two coats of Epoxy Paint
2)
Name of the equipment Trommel
Size Ø 2000 mm x 6000 mm
Mounting Inclined
Inclination 5 degree
Material to be handled MSW
Screen opening Ø 100 x 5mm Thk. M.S Sheet conforming to IS 2062
Guards & Chutes 16G,10G,14G M.S Sheet
Bearing Self aligning ball bearings
Drive Duel
Coupling Chain
Speed 8-10 RPM
Page - 7 -of 59
3)
Name of the equipment “ L” Conveyor-Overs
Profile Horizontal – Inclined
Length of conveyor C/C 9M

24-Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 600mm

Page - 8 -of 59
Drive
4)
Name of the equipment “ L” Conveyor-Unders

24-Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Page - 9 -of 59
Height 600mm

Drive
5)
Name of the equipment Sorting Conveyor
Profile Horizontal
Inclination NA

24-Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Page - 10 -of 59
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 300mm

Drive
6)
Name of the equipment Hydraulic Power Pack with air cooling system
Tank overall size 1250mm x 850mm x 650mm
Capacity 650 lts
Cooling system Heat Exchanger
Connected power 25 HP
Pump Gear pump
Flow control Throttle check valve
Pressure Relief Valve Pilot operated
Page - 11 -of 59
Direction Control valve Single acting
Filter Oil Filling Cap Felted with Filter (breather)
Pressure gauge Glyserine filled 0 to 200 Kg/Cm Sq
Hydraulic Piping Standard as per DIN 2391/C ST 35 NBK
Hydraulic Fitting Suitable for 250 Bar pressure
7)
Name of the equipment Electrical Control Panel
Material of construction of Panel 1.6mm thick CRCA sheet
Degree of protection IP54 /IP65
Earth bus 25 x 6 mm aluminium earth flat
Gasket Neoprene for dust and vermin proofing
Canopy Provided only for outdoor panels
Power Indications RYB indication lamps provided
Isolation of panel Provided with MCCB/SDF
Operation mode Local
Status Indications Provided with lamps for ON/OFF/TRIP
Operating Push Buttons Start/Stop PB•s provided
Mounting Arrangement 75mm base frame provided with holes
Gland Plate 3mm thick GI gland plate provided
Certifications CPRI and IP54/IP65
8)
Name of the equipment Magnetic Separator
Type Over Band Magnetic Separator
Magnet Size 1000 x 600x 300 mm
Page - 12 -of 59
Gauss 1500-1600 G
Drive 1 HP Geared Motor
Operating height 400 mm
Min. Tramp iron to be lifted M24 x 100mm
Page - 13 -of 59
1)
Name of the equipment “ Z” Feed Conveyor
Profile Horizontal – Inclined – Horizontal
Length of conveyor C/C 8.5 M
Bulk Density 0.6-0.7 T/M3
Belt specification 800 mm x 315/3, 3mm Top, 1.5mm Bottom Cover, M 24-
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 600mm
Page - 14 -of 59
Drive
2)
Mounting Inclined
Opening Ø 25 mm
Speed 8 - 10 RPM
Perforated Opening Ø 35 x 4mm Thk. M.S Sheet confirming to IS 2062
Drive Duel
Coupling Chain
3)
Name of the equipment Conveyor-Overs
Profile Horizontal-Inclined
Page - 15 -of 59
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 600mm

Drive
Page - 16 -of 59
4)
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 300mm

Page - 17 -of 59
Drive
5)
Capacity 650 lts
Cooling system Heat Exchanger (water cooled)
Pump Gear pump
6)
Material of construction 1.6mm thick CRCA sheet
Page - 18 -of 59
Operation modes Local
Page - 19 -of 59
3.2.3 Refinement Section (System Capacity: 5 TPH)
1)
Name of the equipment €Z• Feed Conveyor

Profile of conveyor Horizontal – Inclined – Horizontal
1000 mm x 315/3, 3mm Top, 1.5mm Bottom Cover, M
Belt specification
24-Nylon/Nylon.
200 x 6 mm Thk. Fitted all along the length of the
Skirt Rubber
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 600mm
Fabricated from suitable MS Channels & Angles
Supporting structure
Drive
Page - 20 -of 59
2)

Size of Trommel Ø 1800 mm x 5600 mm
Mounting Inclined

Opening Ø 4 mm
Speed 8 - 10 RPM
Wire Mesh Spring steel woven mesh Ø 2mm wire diameter

Drive Duel

Coupling Chain
3)
Name of the equipment €L•Conveyor Overs
Profile of conveyor Horizontal-Inclined


800 mm x 315/3, 3mm Top, 1.5mm Bottom Cover, M 24-
Belt specification
Nylon/Nylon.
Skirt Rubber
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Page - 21 -of 59
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall

Height 600mm

Drive

4)
Name of the equipment €L• Conveyor Unders

Profile of conveyor Horizontal – Inclined
1000 mm x 315/3, 3mm Top, 1.5mm Bottom Cover, M
Belt specification
24-Nylon/Nylon.
Skirt Rubber
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Page - 22 -of 59
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch

Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 300mm
Drive

5)
Name of the equipment Destoner
Screen Size 1052 X 882
Material to be Handled Semi finished MSW Compost

Material to be separated Stones, Sand, Glass
Bulk Density 0.9 T/M3
Capacity 5 TPH
Paricle Size 0 to 4 mm
Drive
7.5 HP For Dynamically Balanced inbuilt fan impellor

1.0 HP with VFD To vary the reciprocating movement of the deck
0. 5 HP Vibratory motor for feed hopper
Provided with rack & pinion arrangement for uniform

Feed hopper
feeding on the deck.
Page - 23 -of 59
Provided with easy replacement type frame with carbon

Deck
steel special crimped wire mesh.
6)
Name of the equipment €L• Destoner Rejects Conveyor
Profile of conveyor Horizontal-Inclined
600 mm x 315/3, 3mm Top, 1.5mm Bottom Cover, M 24-
Belt specification
Nylon/Nylon.
Skirt Rubber
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets

Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45

Side Wall
Height 300mm


Drive
Page - 24 -of 59

7)
Name of the equipment Dust Extraction System
Type Manual Shaking

Compressed air required 3000 CMH
Bag Load 140 m3/h/sqm
Cloth Area 22 sqmt
Material of Bag Poly Poplin
No. of Bags 32 (Bag Matrix: 4x4 + 4x4)
Bag Dia 155mm

Bag Length 1400mm
Bag Matrix 8X4
Centrifugal Blower 3000 CMH 275mm wc pressure
Bag Filter Outer Size 2000 X 1000 X 3600

No. of Dust Collector Bins 2
Drive 5HP
8)
Hydraulic Power Pack with Air Cooling System
Name of the equipment
Capacity 650 lts

Pump Tandem Gear pump

Page - 25 -of 59

9)
Name of the equipment Electrical Control panel
Material of construction 1.6mm thick CRCA sheet


Operation modes Local

Page - 26 -of 59
3.2.4 Shredder & Baler (Capacity: 6 TPH)
1)
Name of the equipment Shredder
Type Shear
Material to be handled MSW Garbage inorganic portion
Capacity 6 TPH
Bulk Density 0.25 – 0.35 T/m3
Material Input size +200mm
Material Output size -70 mm
Material Characteristics Abrasive, Corrosive
Moisture 20-30%
Material Temperature Ambient
Duty Continuous
Feed from Conveyor
Discharge to Conveyor
Specifications
Size of Rotor Ø 600 x 1000 L
Shell MS as per IS 2062
Movable Job Plate MS and Hardox 400
Cutting Tips Alloy Steel
Shaft EN 19
Mesh to filter the material C 45
Supporting Structure MS as per IS 2062
End Plates MS as per IS 2062
Bearings Spherical Roller Bearings
Bearing Housing MS
Page - 27 -of 59
Drive 100 HP coupled with Belt drive to Gear Box Input Shaft
Coupling Gear Coupling for Rotor to Gear Box Output Shaft
Electrical Panel IP 54/IP65 Protected
Hydraulics for pusher
Tank Capacity 150 Ltrs.
Electric Motor 7.5 HP
Pumps Dowty
Pressure Relief Valve Yuken
Direction Control valve Yuken
Hydraulic Fitting Hylok (250 Bar)
Hydraulic Cylinders Ø80 x 440 Stroke (P.R. Ø 50mm)
2)
Name of the equipment Baler
Capacity 4 Tons
Material RDF
Brick Size 425 x 425 x 425mm
Bale Weight 35- 38 Kgs.
Production Capacity 4000 Kg / hr
Bricks / hr 120 Bales / hr
Compression ratio 3:1
Supporting Structure & MS as per IS 2062

Hopper
Motor for Hydraulic Power 50 HP, 1440 rpm, Foot cum Flange Mounting, 3PH,
Pack Continuous Rated, 415V AC +/- 10%, 50 HZ +/- 5%, S1 Duty
Page - 28 -of 59
Class F Insulation, Fan Cooled, IP 55 degree of protection.
Hydraulic Cylinder Pipe ST 52 Honed finish
Piston Rod EN 8 hard chrome plated & grounded
Seal Kit Polyurethene- Bushak shampon/Parker
Pump Dowty
Direction Control Valve Yuken
Check Valve Polyhydron
Accessories Demcon
Controls Electrical Panel
Page - 29 -of 59
4.0. 40-55 TPD MSW COMPOST PLANT MACHINERY
4.1 SCOPE OF SUPPLY
4.1.1 Presorting Section (System Capacity: 7.5 TPH)
1. €Z• Pit Feed Conveyor. (0.8M x 12M) : 01 No
2. Trommel (Ø 2.0M x 6.0M, 100 mm) : 01 No
4. €L• Conveyor – Unders (0.8M x 11.0M for -100mm) : 01 No
5. Sorting Conveyor (0.8M x 12.0M) : 01 No
8. Over Band Magnetic Separator : 01 No
1. €Z• Feed Conveyor (0.65M x 12M) : 01 No
2. Trommel (Ø 1.8Mx 6.0M, 25 opening) : 01 No
3. Conveyor – Overs (0.6M x 9.0 M) : 01 No
4.1.3 Refinement Section (System Capacity: 3-4 TPH)
1. €L• Feed Conveyor (0.6M x 7.0M) : 01 No
2. Rotary Screen (Ø 1.4M x 5 M, 4mm opening) : 01 No
4. Conveyor – Overs (0.6M x 6.0 M) : 01 No
5. Destoner (6.25 Hp) : 01 No
6. Destoner Rejects Conveyor (0.5 x 5M) : 01 No

Page - 30 -of 59
7. Dust Extraction System (3 HP) : 01 No
8. Hydraulic Power Pack with air cooling system (15 Hp) : 01 No
1. Shredder(50 HP) : 01 No
2. Baler(50HP) : 01 No
Page - 31 -of 59
4.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
4.2.1 Presorting Section (System Capacity: 6 TPH)
1)
Name of the equipment €Z• Pit Feed Conveyor
Profile Horizontal - Inclined
Inclination 28 Deg
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 600mm
Page - 32 -of 59

Drive
2)
Mounting Inclined
Screen opening Ø 100 x 5mm Thk. M.S Sheet conforming to IS 2062
Drive Duel
Coupling Chain
Speed 8-10 RPM
3)
Name of the equipment “ L” Conveyor-Overs
Page - 33 -of 59
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 600mm

Drive
Page - 34 -of 59
4)
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 600mm

Page - 35 -of 59
Drive
5)
Name of the equipment Sorting Conveyor
Profile Horizontal
Inclination NA
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Page - 36 -of 59
Height 600mm

Drive Helical Geared Motor
Motor 2 HP
Gear box Helical
Coupling NA
6)
Capacity 650 lts
Pump Gear pump
Page - 37 -of 59
7)
8)
Name of the equipment Magnetic Separator
Type Over Band Magnetic Separator
Magnet Size 1000 x 600x 300 mm
Gauss 1500-1600 G
Drive 1 HP Geared Motor
Operating height 400 mm
Min. Tramp iron to be lifted M24 x 100mm
Page - 38 -of 59
1)
Name of the equipment “ Z” Feed Conveyor
Profile Horizontal – Inclined – Horizontal
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 600mm
Page - 39 -of 59
Drive
2)
Size Ø 1.8 x 6.0M, 25 mm opening
Mounting Inclined
Screen opening Ø 25 x 4mm Thk M.S Sheet conforming to IS 2062
Drive Duel
Coupling Chain
Speed 8-10 RPM
3)
Name of the equipment Conveyor - Overs
Profile Inclined
Page - 40 -of 59
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 600mm

Drive
Page - 41 -of 59
4)
Name of the equipment “ L” Conveyor - Unders
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 300mm

Drive
Page - 42 -of 59
5)
Capacity 600 lts
6)
Page - 43 -of 59
Page - 44 -of 59
4.2.3 Refinement Section (System Capacity: 3-4 TPH)
1)
Name of the equipment “ L” Feed Conveyor
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 600mm

Page - 45 -of 59
Drive
2)
Name of the equipment Rotary Screen
Size Ø 1.4M x 5 M, 4mm opening
Mounting Inclined
Screen opening 4mm, Spring steel Woven Mesh, Ø2mm wire diameter
Drive Duel
Coupling Chain
Speed 8-10 RPM
3)
Name of the equipment “ L” Conveyor - Unders
Page - 46 -of 59
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 300mm

Drive
Page - 47 -of 59
4)
Name of the equipment Conveyor - Overs
Profile Inclined
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 600mm

Drive
Page - 48 -of 59
5)
Name of the equipment Destoner
Screen Size 900 X 840
Material to be Handled Semi finished MSW Compost
Material to be separated Stones, Sand, Glass
Bulk Density 0.8-09 T/M3
Capacity 2.5-3 TPH
Paricle Size 0 to 4 mm
Drive
5 HP For Dynamically Balanced inbuilt fan impellor
1.0 HP with VFD To vary the reciprocating movement of the deck
0.25 HP Vibratory motor for feed hopper
Feed hopper Provided with rack & pinion arrangement for uniform
feeding on the deck.
Deck Provided with easy replacement type frame with carbon

steel special crimped wire mesh.
6)
Name of the equipment Destoner Rejects Conveyor
Profile Inclined
Material to be handled Stones, Sand, Glass etc.
Page - 49 -of 59
Nylon/Nylon.
conveyor
Conveyor Chain
Pitch 76.2 mm (3”)
Conveyor Sprockets
Pitch 76.2 mm pitch
Material C-45
Side Wall
Height 300mm

Drive
Page - 50 -of 59
7)
Name of the equipment Dust Extraction System
Type Manual Shaking
Compressed air required 3000 CMH
Bag Load 140 m3/h/sqm
Cloth Area 11 sqmt
Material of Bag Poly Poplin
No. of Bags 16 (Bag Matrix: 4x4)
Bag Dia 155mm
Bag Length 1400mm
Bag Matrix 4X4
Centrifugal Blower 1500 CMH 275mm wc pressure
Bag Filter Outer Size 1000 X 1000 X 3600
No. of Dust Collector Bins 1
Drive 3HP
8)
Capacity 500 lts
Page - 51 -of 59
9)
Page - 52 -of 59
1)
Name of the equipment Shredder
Type Shear
Material to be handled MSW Garbage inorganic portion
Capacity 3 TPH
Bulk Density 0.25 – 0.35 T/m3
Material Input size +200mm
Material Output size -70 mm
Material Characteristics Abrasive, Corrosive
Moisture 20-30%
Material Temperature Ambient
Duty Continuous
Feed from Conveyor
Discharge to Conveyor
Specifications
Size of Rotor Ø 400 x 800 L
Shell MS as per IS 2062
Movable Job Plate MS and Hardox 400
Cutting Tips Alloy Steel
Shaft EN 19
Mesh to filter the material C 45
Supporting Structure MS as per IS 2062
End Plates MS as per IS 2062
Bearings Spherical Roller Bearings
Bearing Housing MS
Drive 50 HP coupled with Belt drive to Gear Box Input Shaft
Page - 53 -of 59
Coupling Gear Coupling for Rotor to Gear Box Output Shaft
Electrical Panel IP 54/IP65 Protected
2)
Name of the equipment Baler
Capacity 2 Tons
Material RDF
Brick Size 300 x 300 x 300mm
Bale Weight 20- 24 Kgs.
Production Capacity 2500 Kg / hr
Bricks / hr 120 Bales / hr
Compression ratio 3:1
Supporting Structure & MS as per IS 2062

Hopper
Motor for Hydraulic Power 50 HP, 1440 rpm, Foot cum Flange Mounting, 3PH,
Pack Continuous Rated, 415V AC +/- 10%, 50 HZ +/- 5%, S1 Duty
Class F Insulation, Fan Cooled, IP 55 degree of protection.
Hydraulic Cylinder Pipe ST 52 Honed finish
Piston Rod EN 8 hard chrome plated & grounded
Seal Kit Polyurethene- Bushak shampon/Parker
Pump Dowty
Direction Control Valve Yuken
Check Valve Polyhydron
Accessories Demcon
Controls Electrical Panel
Page - 54 -of 59
5.0 PRICE SCHEDULE
Amount
S.No. Description
(Rs in Lacs)
80-100 TPD Composting Plant Machinery
1 Presorting Section (System Capacity: 10-12.5 TPH) 67.00
2 Preparatory Section (System Capacity: 10 TPH) 47.25
3 Refinement Section (System Capacity: 5.0 TPH) 51.50
5 Shredder & Baler 85.00
4 Erection and Commissioning 7.00
TOTAL 257.75
In words: Rupees Two hundred and fifty seven lakhs seventy five thousand only
40-55 TPD Composting Plant Machinery
1 Presorting Section (System Capacity: 7.5 TPH) 57.00
2 Preparatory Section (System Capacity: 6.0 TPH) 41.25
3 Refinement Section (System Capacity: 3-4 TPH) 44.50
5 Shredder & Baler 65.00
4 Erection and Commissioning 6.50
TOTAL 214.25
In words: Rupees Two hundred and fourteen lakhs twenty five thousand only
Note : 1. The price mention above to be read in conjunction with the commercial terms and conditions
annexed to this offer.
2. Final dimensions of the equipments may vary at the time of detailed engineering.
3. Assured capacity of the machinery is with 95% PLF.
Page - 55 -of 59
6.0 COMMERCIAL TERMS & CONDITIONS
 Price terms Ex Works, Hyderabad
For Supplies @
To your account
12%
 GST
For Erection As applicable
Transportation As applicable
 Packing & Forwarding Charges 2% of the Basic cost of the equipment
 Freight To your account
 Transit Insurance To your account
 Storage Insurance at site To your account
 Payment terms for supply (i) 30% of the total contract price to be released as
interest free advance along with the Letter of
Intent/order or contract on submission of a
corporate guarantee.
In case of Advance Bank Guarantee, the value

shall automatically get reduced on diminishing
value basis against supplies effected as per the
invoices submitted.
(ii) 10% of contract price shall be payable as interest

free second advance against submission of
General arrangement drawings.
(iii) 50% shall be payable on prorate basis at right

through irrevocable letter of credit from any
nationalized bank letter of credit shall be opened
within 7 days from the date of our request.
(iv) 5% of contract price shall be released on

completion of mechanical erection and conducting
of No load trials.
(v) 5% of contract price shall be released on

completion of commissioning and submission of
10% performance bank guarantee.
Page - 56 -of 59
 Payment terms for Erection (i) 10% of contract price shall be released as interest
free advance payment along with Work Order /
Purchase Order.
(ii) 10% shall be released on mobilization of erection

personnel and tools & tackles.
(iii) 70% shall be released on stage-wise milestones

completion.
(iv) 5% shall be released on completion of mechanical

erection.
(v) 5% shall be released on completion of erection and

commissioning.
 Delivery period 12 – 14 weeks from the date of receipt of technically

and commercially clear purchase order.
However, any deviations shall be computed

proportionate to the delay of the following:
a) The effective date of startup of delivery shall be
from the date of receipt of first advance.
b) Approval of general arrangement and plant layout

drawing within 15 days from the date of
submission.
c) Receipt of payments as per the agreed payment

terms and within 7 days from date of invoice/s.
d) All efforts will be made to effect the delivery as

agreed, but it shall be subject to force majeure
clause.
Layout drawings shall be submitted within 7 days from

the date of receipt of technically and commercially
 Drawings Submission clear purchase order and receipt of advance.The
General Arrangement drawing shall be released within
7 days from the date of layout approval.
Any deviations in compliance of above payment terms,
shall disable the buyer to invoke any LD clause and
 Delay in payments
HSL shall in no way be responsible for any type of the
project delay.
Page - 57 -of 59
 Warranty HSL warrants its products free from defects in

material, workmanship and design for a period of 18
months from the date of supply or 12 months from the
date of commissioning, whichever expires earlier. In
no instance is there any warranty applicable other
than for MSW processing application and HSL doesn•t
accept responsibility for any of its products that have
been subjected to improper application, negligence,
tampering, or abuse, or which have been repaired or
altered outside of the HSL’s factory by un-authorized
representative. HSL’s liability under this warranty
shall extend only to replacement or repairing at clients
site.
 Inspection
The equipments manufactured by us are fully
inspected stage-wise, by our independent full-fledged
inspection department. However, if you desire
inspection to be carried out by your authorized
representative / third party inspector, it shall be done
within 7 days of notice. If inspection is not carried out
within 7 days of intimation, we shall consider that
inspection has been waived and shall dispatch the
goods to the consignee.
 Force majeure Force majeure will come into effect on the events
explained below but not limited to.
a) Natural phenomena, including but not limited to

weather conditions, floods, draught, earth-quakes
and epidemics.
b) Acts of any government authority, domestic or

foreign, licensing, control of production or
distributions, power-cuts / shortages.
c) Accident and destruction, including but not limited to

fires, explosion and breakdowns of essential
machinery of equipment and power shortage
d) Transportation delay due to force majeure, non-

availability of railway booking or accidents,
damages to equipments in transit or during
erection.
e) Strikes, slow downs, lockouts and sabotages.
Page - 58 -of 59
This offer is valid for a period of 30 days only from

 Validity
date of offer.
No legal proceedings shall be taken to enforce any

claim and no suit arising out of any claim should be
 Jurisdiction
instituted except in courts of competent jurisdiction
located within the municipal limits of Hyderabad.
Title of goods shall be passed on only after receipt of

 Title of Goods
full and final payment.
 Confidentiality i) Offer
Offer submitted herewith is solely for the use of

addressed client and shall not be disclosed to any
other third party without written permission from
HSL.
ii) Documents
Design documents, methods and techniques and

analysis forming part of the supply are solely in
connection with the products supplied. These
documents, methods and techniques shall not be
revealed to any third party without written
authorization from HSL.
Page - 59 -of 59
Dated: 05/09/17 QUOTATION
Ref: CDMA
TO
M/s .FEEDBACK INFRA PVT LTD
15th Floor, Tower 9B, DLF Cyber City, Phase-III
Gurugram 122 002, Haryana, INDIA
TOTAL
S NO VEHILCE DISCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE GST INCLUDED AMOUNT
ACE HT FL CAB/CHASSIS PTO PRO
1 BS4 1 4,08,588.00 INCLUDED 4,08,588.00
2 ACE HOPPER TIPPER 1.8CUM BS3/BS4 1 5,18,417.00 INCLUDED 5,10,000.00
ACE HOPPER TIPPER WITH TARPALINI
3 COVER BS3/BS4 1 5,37,316.00 INCLUDED 5,37,316.00
Above Prices are inclusive of VAT15.2600% .00% Delivery temporary Registration and Insurance Road
transportation charges extra
1. Equipment, specifications and price inclusive of excise duty, and sales tax quoted above are subject to change without notice
and the price prevailing at the time of delivery of the vehicle will apply irrespective of when the application is placed/accepted
or payment received. Octroi, Entry Tax, local levies to be paid by the customer.
2. Payment to be Made in favor Of Tata Motors Ltd Via RTGS Only ,
3. At the time of order booking copy of INCOME TAX PAN CARD/FORM-60/FORM-61 duly filled in along with address proof is
required.
For TATA MOTORS LTD

VINOD MADHAV
AO HYDERABAD
An ISO 9001: 2008 Comp
pany Off: 27750686, 2775
7755743
Res: 27752371, Cell: 9440048680
Balaji
laji EEngineering Works
rks
(SSI Unit No.. 01/
01/22/55010/PMT/17-8-1989) & NSIC/HYD/GP/RS/17 (B-16
162)/2012/8401
MANUFACTURE URES OF: - Wheels Barrows, Platform Trolleys, Try Cycle
Cycl Rickshaw,
Industrial Trolle
rolleys and Sing Boards & Play Ground Equipment.
Plot No.13, Sy. No.237, Chinna Thokatta, Bowenpally, Secunderaba
rabad-500 011
TIN: 36220285270 Website: www.
ww.balajiengineeringworks.com Email: sribalaji743@ 43@yahoo.com
To, Dt: 04.09.2017

04
M/s. Feedback Infra,
Gurgaon, Haryana 122002
Sub: - Quo
uotation for “Tricycle Rickshaws”– Reg
Respected Sir,
We herewith reference to your ve

verbal enquiry. We are submitting our lowest rate
ate of quotation
with expecting early order.
Try Cycle Rickshaws (K.W or K

KD Company) with Garbage Box Rs.18
18,500/- each
Specification:-
The box made with M.S sheet 18 G, G L: 42" × W: 33" × height: 20"fitted in the M.S ang
ngle frame made
with M.S angle 25×25×3 mm with th centre partation (30:70 ratio) and 25 x 3 mm m.s flat
fl welding for
side supports back door provisionn , 2 No’s TVS model wheels of size 2.50-16 fitted ted to shaft with
bearings at back, and front one regu
egular rickshaw wheel of size 28x1½ to suitable axlele rod for fitting
the rear wheels.The body strcture of 35x 35x5mm m.s angle and clamps of 30x5mm m.s .s flat provision
and base with Fiber sheet fixing in the garbage box. The box with one coat of red-ooxide, two coat
enamel paint only. The tricycle garbage
ga collector shall be marked by legibly stencnciling with the
Swachh Bharat Logo, "Swacch Bhharat Mission (Gramin)"in Telugu and villege namee for two sides
with white colour paint only.
Tri-Cycle Rickshaw (Neelam orr K

KW Company) with Garbage Box R.23,
3,000/- each
Specification:-
The box made with L-48"x W-36"x 6"x H-24" fabricated with 18G Iron angles of 25 x 25 2 x 3 mm for
bottom and vertical corners and M.S. .S. flat of size 25 x 3 mm for top edges and adequate ate no. of 25 x 3
mm flats provided additionally for or stiffness in between the angle iron/flat the bin. Th The bin shall be
provided with grooves at two locatiotions ( at centre and at the ratio of 30:70) for providing
ing partition The
Chassis shall be made of MS angul ular section of 35 x 35 x 5 mm and Flat sections of 35x5mm. The
Tri-Cycle assembly shall consist of Mild steel tubular frame –Five bar with 8.6mm x 1.63mm, 1 Cycle
Rickshaw wheel of size 28 x 1 1/22 for f front and 2.50-16 TVS - XL wheels for rearsidee , suitable axle
rod for fitting the rear wheels. Hand
ndle bar and fork assembly, Hand Breaking system.. All A the metallic
parts other than those painted shall
ll bbe with one coat red-oxide and two coat enamel pain aint. The tricycle
garbage collector shall be markedd by legibly stenciling with the Swachh Bharat L Logo, "Swacch
Bharat Mission(Gramin)"in Telugu and villege name for two sides with white colour paint pa only.
Thanking You,
Yours Faithfully,
For Balaji Engineering Works
Proprietor
&)** +*& & , &)** %-&' &'&
. /
0 1$ 23- 3
"4 ( 0 5+ -0 ) )
( , $$$

Ieeja Draft DPR (27.10.17) PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ieeja Draft DPR (27.10.17) PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ieeja Draft DPR (27.10.17) PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

$%% & ' (

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 8

1.1 Introduction to the Project ............................................................................................. 8

CHAPTER 2. PROFILE OF IEEJA URBAN LOCAL BODY ............................................................... 17

2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 17

CHAPTER 3. ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ............. 22

3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 22

CHAPTER 4. WASTE QUANTIFICATION & CHARACTERIZATION ............................................... 35

4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 35

4.2 Quantification of Waste ............................................................................................... 35

CHAPTER 5. PLANNING FOR INTEGRATED MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN

5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 41

CHAPTER 6. PROPOSED SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN............... 49

6.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 49

6.4.1 Primary Collection of Waste............................................................................................ 51

CHAPTER 7. DESIGN AND PLANNING OF TREATMENT PLANT ................................................. 58

7.1 Integrated Waste Treatment Facility............................................................................ 58

CHAPTER 8. PLANNING AND DESIGN OF SANITARY LANDFILL ................................................ 83

8.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 83

CHAPTER 9. PROJECT COSTING ................................................................................................ 88

9.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 88

9.2 Total Capital Cost of the project ................................................................................... 88

CHAPTER 10. INFORMATION, EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION (IEC).......................... 111

10.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 111

CHAPTER 11. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN ......................................................... 127

11.1 Objective..................................................................................................................... 127

11.15 Fire Protection System ............................................................................................... 136

Table 1-1: List of ULBs – Project Area ................................................................................................... 15

Table 6-10: Existing vehicles with ULB .................................................................................................. 56

CDMA Commissioner and Directorate of Municipal Administration

C&D Construction and Demolition

C&T Collection and Transportation

GoI Government of India

MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forest

MoUD Ministry of Urban Development

MSW Municipal Solid Waste

MSWM Municipal Solid Waste Management

O&M Operation and Maintenance

P&D Processing and Disposal

SBM Swach Bharat Mission

TPD Tons per day

TUFIDC Telangana Urban Finance and Infrastructure Development Limited

ULB Urban Local Body

Municipal Solid Waste management is important as it impacts health, environment and

II. Profile of Ieeja

Population 27921 people in 2011

Transportation The town connects Kurnool in Andhra Pradesh with Raichur in

Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page i

Literacy Rate 47.13 % during 2011.

III. Assessment of Existing Solid Waste Management

S. No Type of Waste Generators Number

Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page ii

IV. Waste Quantification & Characterization

Particulars of Waste Generation

Submitted by M/s. FeedBack Infra Pvt Ltd Page iii

Chemical Composition of Solid Waste

V. Planning for Integrated MSW Management System in ULB

The factors which are considered in preparation of the MSWM plan